Stewards/Confirm/2021

Translate this page at Template:Steward confirmations.

The 2021 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

The 2021–22 Confirmation will begin on 05 February, and will finish on 26 February.

The 2021–22 Steward Confirmations are an opportunity for the Wikimedia community to comment on the performance of existing stewards. To make the process as smooth as possible, the confirmations are organized as follows.

To comment, please log in with an account that has edits (on any wiki) before 05 February. During the 2021 Elections, please mention if you are comfortable or unhappy with the use of steward tools of any of the people listed below and why.

After the election, stewards (including the newly-elected ones) are invited to review the confirmation comments and to give their impression of the outcome (consensus to confirm/remove etc.) on Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2021 for every steward who stood for confirmation. Of course, they are not required to do this for every candidate and will be especially careful to do it regarding someone about whom they expressed strong opinions in the confirmation. Non-steward comments are welcome outside of the "Final Decision" section, subject to the usual expectations of civility. Confirmation discussions will last one week after the appointment of the newly elected stewards. This may be extended to two weeks for one or more confirmations at the discretion of the Election Committee if the committee believes further input is required before concluding. The Election Committee will close these discussions and implement the outcome (which also means making a decision in non-obvious cases).

All stewards elected before February 2021 will undergo this process.

-revi edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: ko, en-3
Personal info: I was quite sick early 2020, to the point that I had to get a COVID testing just to be admitted to the hospital (tested negative though) - later when I was recovering, the "Wikipedia Foundation" saga happened and my activity in Wikimedia dropped to near-zero. (I was also busy with IRL event that suddenly emerged with COVID.)
After few months, I started to edit again, but at a lower frequency. I am not sure if I am still needed at the WMF projects, given WMF's "We don't care about community" attitude. I actually thought of resigning, but decided to stand for renewal this year because I think community still benefits from having one more steward from Asian timezone.
Only excuse I have for this year's low activity is COVID (yeah, easy excuse, but that's the largest hit around the world.). At least I expect my IRL pressure to (sorta) drop, so I will be more active this year. I've still processed some OS request and global locks involving suppression of usernames, in addition to what is publicly visible.
These days, I am not sure if I want to be a part of this movement, but I still believe in the community, not the WMF.

Full disclosure

My contract with WMF is over, as indicated by SE2020 statement. (See also: SE2018 / Confirmation 2019 / Confirmation 2020)
— regards, Revi 10:23, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about -revi edit

Keep. I'm going to get preachy for a second and draw attention to a brief conversation -revi and I had with WMF representatives here. Over the next few years, if the WMF continues along the path it is going, we all will have a decision to make. Quite frankly, the WMF has the capability to run the entire movement into the ground if they continue to ignore what the community (read: the people who write the content) has to say. At some point, there will be a number of high-profile departures of key community talent that will accelerate the process. But yet, especially today there is a need for accurate and free information, and Wikipedia still remains a top 15 site. And real people still face harassment on Wikimedia projects and need assistance from administrators, functionaries, and stewards. These are all things that we have to have to think very carefully about going forward. --Rs chen 7754 14:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Enough activity to justify, and willing to take up some of the hardest decisions like locking a compromised account recently, removal of sysop rights from Vodomar etc. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Active and competent. Blablubbs (talk) 14:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Active, trusted, competent. Giraffer (talk) 14:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, No concerns.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep laziness is often a good thing in the ranks. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 14:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I really enjoyed working with you. Respectfully, --Yuri Krestinichev (talk) 14:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep non-robotic and not afraid to speak up on issues that you believe should be addressed. I appreciate that. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 14:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 14:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Amanda (aka DQ) 15:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mehman 97 15:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active, trusted and no concerns from me. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | enwiki} 15:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Oh, I might have been like Dobby if he hadn't signed up for confirmation this year :p --Sotiale (talk) 15:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Saroj Uprety (talk) 15:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns. Miniapolis 16:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the best stewards, so yes if he wants continue. --MrJaroslavik (talk) 16:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep GeneralNotability (talk) 16:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Barkeep49 (talk) 18:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep KevinL (aka L235 · t) 18:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mz7 (talk) 18:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep YuzaTea (talk) 18:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — xaosflux ^Talk 18:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active user on permission requests and SRG, also helpful. --Uncitoyen^talk 19:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep useful. no concerns. --Stïnger （会話） 20:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep Good, active steward. --Count Count (talk) 21:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not the best steward around, but still a capable user that can handle stewardry. Leaderboard (talk) 21:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ToBeFree (talk) 22:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - competent, active and helpful. – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Active, helpful and competent. No concerns. Meiræ 01:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep excellent steward. Java Hurricane 02:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Helpful on EnWP — pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 03:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 04:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 05:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 06:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 08:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. —— Eric Liu_{（留言．百科用戶頁）} 09:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Superpes15 (talk) 11:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lemure Saltante (talk) 13:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Michel Bakni (talk) 17:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Cooperative Person --Ibrahim.ID ✪ 17:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 17:59, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active, helpful, and competent steward. ~~It's refreshing to see that Revi took concerns about his role as WMF staff on board in the last confirmation.~~ I'm glad to enthusiastically support this time. OhKayeSierra (talk) 19:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, for the record: the contract was not renewed for other reason but I'm not going to get into specifics here on wiki. — regards, Revi 00:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep revi has been a competent and trusted steward. Thank you for your service and I look forward to continuing to working with you. Waggie (talk) 20:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 22:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ivi104 (talk) 00:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Kocgs (talk) 08:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Active, experienced, knowledgeable, friendly. AGK ■ 09:10, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove,when I English level is poor,ban I edit SRCU right after and don't communication with me,this is abuse of power,and discrimination my language skills,also,this steward don't need to help our community,and don't want to cooperate to stop sockpuppets destruction behavior.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I will just link the relevant communications: #. Also, it was performed under stewards-l's unanimous consensus at that time, that this user's SRCU submissions were problematic. — regards, Revi 10:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ElectCom member comment: Extended discussion around this topic has been moved to Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2021/-revi#Discussion for MCC214's comment. —Thanks for the fish! ^{talk•contribs} 17:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, helpful and qualified — NickK (talk) 13:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Don't bother with kids. --Techyan（Talk） 21:19, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --IWI (talk) 21:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep cool wäre ein Klick :) --Itti (talk) 22:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.--جار الله (talk) 02:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Yair rand (talk) 03:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AVSmalnad77 ^talk 05:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep useful. no concerns. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - No concerns.--Sun8908 (talk) 09:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep：--AlexLeeCN (talk) 14:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 21:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Iluvatar (talk) 00:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 12:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns and is a very helpful user. Hope to see you more active this year! R4356th (talk) 15:20, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Definitely a great user.Ahmetlii (talk) 16:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good steward, they're on the Discord server which is nice to see. Elliot321 (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep:--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 11:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, only logical end to your behavior is you are socking. — regards, Revi 03:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ElectCom member comment: Extended discussion around this topic has been moved to Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2021/-revi#Discussion for 蟲蟲飛's comment. —Thanks for the fish! ^{talk•contribs} 17:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep huh — Ddxfx 04:01, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- 94rain ^Talk 04:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Air7538 (talk) 07:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have no concerns about you --ARychlik (talk) 08:27, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:11, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Antigng (talk) 09:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --SDKmac (talk) 13:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Manchiu (talk) 13:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep duh. Praxidicae (talk) 15:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep tksk (talk) 17:37, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nehaoua (talk) 22:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : enough of all the chaos, and, at least with years of communication, I don't see revi cannot do the job at a satisfactory level (or higher)--1233 （T / C） 06:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Apploigize for the incompetence of the zhwiki community-AINH (talk) 17:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 20:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --LexICon (talk) 01:05, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We are waiting for your answer. Thanks.--Zangala (talk) 09:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Mark7747 (talk) 13:32, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Maestro Ivanković 19:17, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mykola7 (talk) 21:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 23:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lentokonefani (talk) 14:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Aspiriniks (talk) 06:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course, keep.—Impartial just (with out 2FA) (talk) 07:17, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 14:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure!--Faisal ^talk 05:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—〚 Arronwan 〛 09:33, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 11:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep chansey ^message? 13:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Geraki ^T_L 19:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 13:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 13:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Keep. He works very well. -- LaMagiaaa (talk) 16:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 19:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 15:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Jules ^Talk 10:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 11:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I don't understand what is "cabal".--海の向こうは敵だ！ 14:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@BureibuNeko Cabal based on enwiktionary means these. Hope this clarifies what Cabal means. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 16:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Camouflaged Mirage： No, you got it wrong. I mean to ask him why he said WMC is "cacbl", but thank you for your kind reply!--海の向こうは敵だ！ 03:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporarily change the ticket. For some reasons, I decided to vote

Keep.--海の向こうは敵だ！ 03:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Darkhan 16:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep---Koala0090 (talk) 17:52, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Still support. Would it be much better to just use the factual description on handling matters, regarding to your comment: “Yeah, I know WMC cabal is trying to save her”[1]? --Gluo88 (talk) 19:25, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good steward, and upon meeting him, a wonderful human being.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 21:14, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep one of the best we have. —Jasper Deng (talk) 20:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Baycrest (talk) 17:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, however I think he may do more and be even more decisive. Σαν μο σα^{The Trve Lawe of free Monarchies} 02:54, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pedram^Talk 08:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep LGTM. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 15:29, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Absolutely ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 20:47, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --DannyS712 (talk) 22:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 04:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 10:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cabayi (talk) 14:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ——SerialNumber54129 17:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep DraconicDark (talk) 05:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 13:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 18:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 18:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 10:53, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stobaios (talk) 13:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Base edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: uk-N, ru-4, be-3 (only understanding), en-2.5, fr-0.5, es-0.5, nl-0.5, ja-0.5, slavic-0.5, romance-0.25, ukl-0.25
Personal info: Hello, this is my second confirmation as a steward.
Last year the main issues that were brought up about my stewardship were low activity that also had a large gap in it. This time I have managed to be active quite evenly throughout the year. The total quantitative statistics of my stewardship aren't great, but if you discount global blocks and locks which were not the areas I have focused on, you will find me somewhere in the middle of the list actions wise.
What I did focus on was primarily permission management on SRP and SRGP, communication with WMF in the monthly calls (I've attended roughly a half of them) as well as with the fellow stewards via our communication channels. The most uncommon actions I have taken this tenure were a couple of bigdelete usages in some major Wikipedias, requested at SRM. I've also been doing some user renames, being one of the two Ukrainian and one of the few Russian speakers with the access, as well as an amount of GS domain actions. Actions aside I was trying to be active in Wikimedia Stewards User Group, in particular making sure we do not stand asides regarding branding open letter. I've also done some outreach explaining the role of the stewards to other users, especially Ukrainian community and to lesser extent Russian community and just individual Wikimedians or groups of them on various formal and informal platforms (chats, regular virtual meetings, a Wikiconference)
The challenges I've faced mostly are related to being conscious with the boundary I have to keep regarding my home community while also being helpful to deal with LTAs originating from it. I do act when I need to, and try to inform the community members on where the boundary shall lie, but if this ends up being uncomfortable I plan discussing it at a relevant administrator forum.
If I am confirmed for another tenure I will continue doing at least the same, I do also hope to login to OTRS more, potentially dedicate some more time to do some counter-vandalism work I mostly prioritise low for myself. I hope to also work on some technical tools. It is heart-warming for me to see that many stewards are using my GIPBE logging gadget created last tenure for instance. I am also looking forward towards WMF figuring out the procedure to verify people's 2FA statuses proactively, I plan to get involved in this if there is room to help. If not confirmed I still plan to eventually work on the technical things, will stick around the usergroup and will probably eventually request permissions necessary to do some of the actions I've been doing as a steward, such as global renames.
Thank you for the feedback and I am looking forward finally hitting 10 years as a Wikimedian this year either as a steward or not :) And for those reading the same day I wrote this, Happy Wikipedia Day! --Base (talk) 10:14, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Base edit

Keep Active in rights managements, IPBE, 2FA, thanks so much for your work elsewhere too :D. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep he’s a chill dude. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Blablubbs (talk) 14:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Thanks a lot for supporting Wikimedia Community User Group Belarus in our translation efforts, especially be-tarask: Wikipedia.--W (talk) 14:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Help from you comes instantly. Respectfully, --Yuri Krestinichev (talk) 14:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 14:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 14:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Raviaka Ruslan (talk) 14:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mehman 97 15:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sotiale (talk) 15:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Saroj Uprety (talk) 15:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns. Miniapolis 16:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK, --MrJaroslavik (talk) 16:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — xaosflux ^Talk 18:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns. --Count Count (talk) 21:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep - competent and active. – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Decently active, helpful and competent. No concerns. Meiræ 01:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep another great steward. Java Hurricane 02:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.Zhuofan Wu^{Cien años de soledad} 03:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 05:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 06:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active steward, especially on permission requests. --Uncitoyen^talk 06:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AVSmalnad77 ^chat 07:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 08:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 08:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 22:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gereon K. (talk) 08:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, helpful. Giraffer (talk) 14:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nebydlogop (talk) 17:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Юрко Градовський (talk) 18:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep useful. no concerns. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 21:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Iluvatar (talk) 00:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elliot321 (talk) 19:54, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Visible Light (talk) 21:16, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sun8908 (talk) 11:01, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Manchiu (talk) 13:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nehaoua (talk) 22:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 20:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krzysztof Pałucha (talk) 21:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Please fix your en-X claim though; you're much better than en-2.5 as you claim. In fact, I would not be able to distinguish you from an en-N user. Leaderboard (talk) 21:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --LexICon (talk) 01:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Zangala (talk) 10:31, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Maestro Ivanković 19:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mykola7 (talk) 21:37, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 13:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 13:51, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 19:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Saramag (talk) 13:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 👍 Carn (talk) 14:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 15:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AGK ■ 22:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Jules ^Talk 10:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 16:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 10:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 20:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral ——SerialNumber54129 17:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Yair rand (talk) 04:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep DraconicDark (talk) 05:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 13:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 18:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 18:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 10:53, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:33, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BRPever edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages:
Personal info: Hello everyone. A lot of unexpected things happened last year, and my activities decreased significantly in the later months. I am still trying to recover, but the progress is slow. I think I will only be able to be back by the end of this year, so I am not standing for confirmation this year. I will occasionally be active in other areas so that I could still keep that wikimedian feeling alive within me. Thank you :)

Comments about BRPever edit

Keep Sadly, but I respect your decision. No issue for you retaining GR/GS. Take care IRL and I am really sad to see this. :( Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Really sad. Thanks for your work :) -- CptViraj (talk) 14:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your past efforts bro. Take care. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your help!--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions! —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 14:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your good work. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 14:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I will miss you. Hope to come back. --Sotiale (talk) 15:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for your service, and take care! Miniapolis 16:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
TYFYS! ミラP@Miraclepine 16:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work!--MrJaroslavik (talk) 16:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for everything BRPever, and I hope to see you as steward again. --IWI (talk) 16:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sad to see you go. Hope you'll come back! —Thanks for the fish! ^{talk•contribs} 19:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work as a steward. --Stïnger （会話） 00:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Thanks for your work, and all the best for the future! You did a good job over the last year, from what I saw. – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service. --Rs chen 7754 01:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Take care and thank you for your work, hope you'll come back. Meiræ 02:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all your work! Hope to see you back soon. Java Hurricane 02:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 06:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Although your activity has decreased in recent months, you were very active last year. Thanks for your service. --Uncitoyen^talk 06:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service. --mirinano (talk) 08:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service. --Geonuch (talk) 02:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, take care and hope to see you back when you are ready — NickK (talk) 13:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work! --Whiteguru (talk) 07:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thx & expect to see you later this year; greeting & salutations, Klaas `Z4␟` V: 21:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all of your good work, BRPever. Please take care. Hiàn (talk) 21:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hope your year goes ok, and thanks for your work. Elliot321 (talk) 19:55, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work. Hope to see you back in this role in the future. -- 94rain ^Talk 03:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for what you've done :) --Minorax (talk) 09:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
REQUEST: Would you kindly say a few words about the following terms for those of us who know little about what Stewards do:
- global blocks
- global unblocks
- global locks
- global unlocks
- hidings
Thanks in advance, Ottawahitech (talk) 16:26, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ottawahitech Not BRPever but well Global blocks, Global locks (which covers unblocks / unlocks too), and hidings are used for username which meets Oversight policy. Are you just unaware of these or are you wanting more in depth explanation? Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 16:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, hope to see you back soon --Alaa :)..! 17:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service and assistance, hope to see you back sometime. Sgd. —Hasley 19:06, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
a symbolic Keep. Thanks for your work. --Wim b 20:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, thank you and hope to see you at SE eventually. --Base (talk) 23:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service. /Julle (talk) 20:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Symbolic Keep already for when you BRPever will be active again. Klaas `Z4␟` V: 13:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! --Achim (talk) 19:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:01, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service. AGK ■ 22:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work.--Gluo88 (talk) 04:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service. Baycrest (talk) 17:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Taivo (talk) 09:55, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service.—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service, Take care and I wish you all the very best. –Davey2010^Talk 20:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service. Ahmad^talk 13:39, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 18:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your time here! --Charitwo (talk) 19:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work --DannyS712 (talk) 19:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Nadzik (talk) 08:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all you have done. RadiX ∞ 12:34, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bsadowski1 edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages:
Personal info: I have been part of the steward team now for 10 years and hope to continue working with my colleagues. I have been primarily focused on handling vandalism and spambots across the projects. One of my goals for this year is to do other tasks that I have not spent more time on (such as rights changes).

Comments about Bsadowski1 edit

Keep Hope you can move into rights management as you said, but well blocking/locking is enough work for you, don't burn out. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove It is concerning enough that this steward seems to be incapable of doing anything other than locking accounts. They also violate Communication is required as well. If you try to talk to them on-wiki, you won't get a response. The only way to contactt them is on Freenode. That alone is bad enough. Most of the time any messages are sarcastic/unhelpful and not what I would expect from a Wikimedia Steward. Locking the occasional spambot every now and then does not really excuse that, someone else can do that. Naleksuh (talk) 14:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep having someone familiar with video games around is a positive. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @TonyBallioni: How is that a positive? Not trying to start something because you said to keep someone I said to remove, just genuinely curious. Naleksuh (talk) 14:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Naleksuh, my keep votes in steward confirms are just my saying nice things about people I’ve interacted with. If I’ve interacted with them more, I make a bit of a joke in them, hence the video game bit. On a serious point, Bsadowski1 is prolific at fighting LTAs and one of the best we have at that. It’d be a loss for us if he were removed. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 14:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I have experienced communication issues with this user where they are hard to get hold of anywhere, including IRC. This is problematic when often, getting hold of a steward is very important and time-sensitive. I also found myself repeatedly harangued and belittled in an uncivil manner any time I made a rookie mistake when I first started out cross-wiki last year (and still continues), which is not what I want to see from a steward. Sorry, --IWI (talk) 14:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 14:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Been working here since I was a small kid starting out on Wikipedia ;-) no issues. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question Hi, the discussion at Requests for comment/Site-wide administrator abuse and WP:PILLARS violations on the Croatian Wikipedia has been pending a close for the entirety of the last term, and has not had any Steward significantly discuss with the participants its status, despite a couple of requests and the more recent passing of the meta closure of rfc policy. Could you explain why a) you and b) the Stewards as a whole, failed to close (and, as applicable, execute, it)? As a connected point to the most likely answers (too complicated, insufficiently clear remedies, not in remit, etc) could you clarify both why it/they apply but also why you/the Stewards didn't make that known to every participant and ask for specific actions taken to make it possible for the Stewards to act on it, despite the insane timescale? Nosebagbear (talk) 15:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Baseless removes are utterly unconvincing. Brian is a perfectly fine steward. Praxidicae (talk) 15:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- "I don't agree with the base" is not the same thing as "baseless". Naleksuh (talk) 18:56, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sotiale (talk) 15:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns. Miniapolis 16:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep KevinL (aka L235 · t) 18:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mz7 (talk) 18:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ToBeFree (talk) 22:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meiræ 02:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep really good steward, always approachable, and great experience with LTAs. No concerns. Java Hurricane 02:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 04:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 05:59, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 06:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the most active stewards of last year, especially active for global locks and blocks. --Uncitoyen^talk 06:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 08:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 08:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, He's good. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--باسم (talk) 17:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Michel Bakni (talk) 17:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Incredible at fighting spambots and very responsive when locks are needed to protect the projects. We would be in much worse shape without them. Thank you for your service! Waggie (talk) 20:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 23:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, very helpful at fighting spambots and proxies — NickK (talk) 13:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AVSmalnad77 ^talk 05:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --DannyS712 (talk) 18:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 21:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- 94rain ^Talk 04:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nehaoua (talk) 23:01, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 20:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --LexICon (talk) 01:06, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Zangala (talk) 10:32, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Maestro Ivanković 19:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 23:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Faisal ^talk 05:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 11:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 19:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 16:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AGK ■ 22:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 16:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Multiple editors with "communication is required" concerns is reason for some caution and examination. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 20:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. --Dostojewskij (talk) 22:31, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mos def ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 20:51, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 04:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cabayi (talk) 14:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Freenode. ——SerialNumber54129 17:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Yair rand (talk) 04:58, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Belwine (talk) 13:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 13:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 18:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 19:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 10:55, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:35, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Defender edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: pt-N, en-2, es-1
Personal info: It has been an honor and privilege to assist the community as a steward since 2017 and if I still deserve the confidence of the community, I would be delighted to serve for another term. I couldn't be as active as I wished to be in the past year due to personal circumstances and the pandemic, but I'm confident I will be more active this year. I'm looking forward to your feedback. Thank you for considering. Defender (talk) 06:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Defender edit

Keep Thanks for defending wikimedia. Surely helpful everywhere. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, No concerns. --Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 14:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep absolutely —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 16:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no vandals score on his watch. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ented (talk) 18:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — xaosflux ^Talk 18:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No concerns. Meiræ 02:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 02:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 06:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 08:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active steward. --Uncitoyen^talk 13:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 23:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, please keep defending Wikimedia — NickK (talk) 13:10, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep jni (talk) 07:57, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 21:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Manchiu (talk) 04:45, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --94rain ^Talk 06:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nehaoua (talk) 23:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 01:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 20:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --LexICon (talk) 01:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Zangala (talk) 10:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Maestro Ivanković 19:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 23:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 14:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Dux Praxis (talk) 16:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 13:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 19:14, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --AGK ■ 22:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 16:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Dostojewskij (talk) 22:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A very competent and active steward. --Sîmbotin (talk) 13:02, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 02:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 08:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Joalpe (talk) 10:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 20:51, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral ——SerialNumber54129 17:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 13:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 18:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 19:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:35, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DerHexer edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: de, en-3, es-1
Personal info: I was elected a steward in 2007. 2020 has been a tough year for many of us. I had to find some onwiki activity to cover the many offwiki activities which used to keep me motivated. I found it in categorization and structured data on Wikimedia Commons and Wikidata. Hence, also my activities as a steward dropped a bit. However, I found some more motivation for steward activities some months ago. My main focus of steward activities changed a couple of times, and so I still help fight some long-time vandals and be available for various tasks. I try to help out in the background with my long-time experience and reach out to our partners. For example, I am one of the co-organizers of the Wikimedia Stewards User Group which I helped set up, and wrote the report for our 2020 activities. Since I got my IRC client fixed, I returned to a more active level there, too. With having these things on my table, I still think that I can enrich this group. I still enjoy playing a part in the stewards group although I am not anymore one of their most active members and I would like to provide my service once again. Thanks in advance for your feedback.

Comments about DerHexer edit

Keep Not directly related to stewards, but DerHexer is one of the most responsive oversighter we had on meta, he is also active elsewhere, hard for ~~11 years of~~ such dedication from 2007. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Modified to reflect the years served. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep XenonX3 (talk) 15:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mehman 97 15:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sotiale (talk) 15:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 16:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Susann Schweden (talk) 17:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep C[omikron]lin (talk) 18:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — xaosflux ^Talk 18:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Werner von Basil (talk) 19:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holmium (talk) 19:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep According to logs and loginwiki statistics, the least active steward in 2020 (there are around 100-200 actions). But he tried to be an active user on Meta and other wikis. I can ignore his low performance this year, because he is a long-term steward. I hope he can catch up with his old performance as a steward next year. --Uncitoyen^talk 20:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Being a good steward is more than just about numbers. Legoktm (talk) 06:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - I have already made my comment by logs and statistics. It is clear that DerHexer is 2020's the least active steward. Already I support him in my comment. Inactive stewards, normally close to the number of transactions DerHexer made as a steward, they weren't supported in the past years. see Stewards/Confirm/2020/There'sNoTime There'sNoTime had made 100 actions and 113 loginwiki CUs in 2019 as a steward. DerHexer has 68 actions and 19 loginwiki CUs from March 2020 to today as a steward. --Uncitoyen^talk 08:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - It's crazy because it feels like much (!) more activity. But maybe my feelings are irritated by the bunch of emails which I've send to stewards-l since last election, the plenty of video calls I have joint to interact with the group, the co-maintenance of the IRC bots and such. I'm not a huge fan of spambot fighting anymore in a proactive way because it consumes so much time when the actual harm is not very clear. Instead, I try to step in when I see actual abuse happening but due to an increased load at work and challenges with my IRC client, I couldn't monitor as in previous years; quite often, other stewards who do not seem to be covered by such workload, tend to be a little faster then. I do know that the blank log numbers are an indicator for activity but not only. It's not untrue that I prefer to work more in the background where I am still quite responsive but my activities are less visible. However, I would try to give some additional emphasis on log actions for next year (ironically, I just had the chance to do that some days ago). Best, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      - As I said, the statistics are clear. Also everyone was surprised last year because of this coronavirus. This affected most stewards either negatively or positively (free time for on-wiki, off-wiki or real life). Since you are a good steward for years, I can ignore your low public activity as a steward this year. As you said, you can be an active steward in the background. I hope you will be more active steward next year. :) --Uncitoyen^talk 12:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good steward, activity still sufficient. --Count Count (talk) 21:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --JoeHard (talk) 21:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bubo 容 21:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zollernalb (talk) 21:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree with Count Count. --Funkruf (talk) 21:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mombacher (talk) 22:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --ɱ 22:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- one of very less people on thes earth I trust blind. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep - good source of institutional knowledge, and helpful with coordinating the user group. – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep we’ve disagreed before on lists, but that’s not a cause to either dislike someone or oppose them. Glad to keep his knowledge. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meiræ 02:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 02:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 06:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I trust him completely. --Pimpinellus (talk) – WikiMUC – 07:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 08:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 08:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 09:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Johannnes89 (talk) 10:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hogü-456 (talk) 12:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --ZabeMath (talk) 13:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Cirdan (talk) 14:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I don't see any problems. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:59, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep well done, please continue. --Agathenon (talk) 15:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ffm (talk) 17:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ibrahim.ID ✪ 17:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. —viciarg⁴¹⁴ 20:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good job :-) -- Ra'ike (talk) 22:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BugWarp (talk) 22:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 23:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 00:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gereon K. (talk) 08:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gripweed (talk) 10:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, your experience is very useful — NickK (talk) 13:10, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --PerfektesChaos (talk) 14:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trust in him --Elmie (talk) 17:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep cool wäre ein Klick :) --Itti (talk) 22:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alraunenstern۞ 22:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AVSmalnad77 ^talk 09:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kpisimon (talk) 11:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Aspiriniks (talk) 12:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Helfmann (talk) 15:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 21:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghormon (talk) 11:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rmcharb (talk) 19:53, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --MarcelBuehner (talk) 22:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --O.Koslowski (talk) 08:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --SDKmac (talk) 13:46, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Godihrdt (talk) 14:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nehaoua (talk) 23:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Graphikus (talk) 23:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Fjmustak (talk) 22:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Björn Hagemann (talk) 09:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- ARASH PT talk 13:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geolina163 (talk) 18:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 20:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Zangala (talk) 10:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Lutheraner (talk) 12:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--F.ponizil (talk) 19:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Maestro Ivanković 19:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I do hope their logged activity gradually increases, but they are available and active in non action rich ways so no concerns at the moment. --Base (talk) 23:05, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 07:13, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 14:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Morten Haan (talk) 20:12, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep /Julle (talk) 20:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 11:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep chansey ^message? 13:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bicycle Tourer (talk) 19:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 13:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — JGHowes ^talk - 16:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 19:15, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 16:08, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Tim (SVG) 19:32, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AGK ■ 22:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Esteban (talk) 14:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 16:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gerhardvalentin (talk) 08:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Dostojewskij (talk) 22:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kein Einstein (talk) 19:36, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Snookerado (talk) 20:34, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 02:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 08:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Regiomontanus (talk) 03:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱ _{C L @ S}˲» 13:36, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hardenacke (talk) 14:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --YaganZ (talk) 19:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 20:52, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—--Coffins (talk) 21:10, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ― ANKAN (talk) 05:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nolispanmo (talk) 09:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cabayi (talk) 14:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pentachlorphenol (talk) 11:26, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --1971markus (talk) 18:31, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Yair rand (talk) 04:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 13:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 18:58, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 19:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stefan64 (talk) 08:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 10:55, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stobaios (talk) 13:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bärbel Miemietz (talk) 13:54, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Einsbor edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: pl-N, en-3, fr-2
Personal info: This is my second confrimation after reelection in 2019. This year was in many ways unusual. I have been active in the first part, later I was inactive. There are some pros of working from home, alas, there are some cons as well. I have been thinking about stepping down. But I realized that I still can be useful in some ways. I still can help in AAR, in some elections as scrutineer or in some everyday work. If you think that this kind of activity will be valuable enough - I am ready to do the job. On the other hand, if you think that this is not an asset - I really do understand. I can offer my willingness to serve for another term. einsbor _talk 20:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Einsbor edit

Keep Still active, and AAR is thankless job. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He/she tried to be active. Also very helpful in AAR works. --Uncitoyen^talk 14:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Szoltys (talk) 15:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 16:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 17:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ented (talk) 18:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep PawełMM (talk) 19:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Count Count (talk) 21:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ToBeFree (talk) 22:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meiræ 02:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 02:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 06:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 08:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ffm (talk) 17:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 23:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, can still be useful indeed — NickK (talk) 13:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Gdarin | talk 14:33, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:51, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nehaoua (talk) 23:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Em-mustapha ^{User | talk} 23:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 20:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hektor Absurdus (talk) 23:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Zangala (talk) 10:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Fanchb29 (talk) 17:11, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 23:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jamnik z Tarnowa (talk) 10:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Jacek555 (talk) 17:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 19:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 16:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AramilFeraxa (talk) 20:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --AGK ■ 22:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 16:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. --Dostojewskij (talk) 22:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 19:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 02:35, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~Cybularny ^Speak? 23:11, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 18:58, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 19:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, keep goin! Nadzik (talk) 08:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Green Giant edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages:
Personal info: Hello all. Sorry, I am late with this statement. Apologies to those who have written kind words in response to my possible resignation. This has been a very difficult year for me. Sadly I have lost members of my immediate family to the accursed coronavirus. I had the virus for several weeks in the autumn (fall) and my health has not recovered to the same level as this time last year. On a less important level, my time has been additionally curtailed with working to counteract the effects of our beloved Brexit. I was thinking of resigning late last year but I have changed my mind. If I resign over this, it will feel as though COVID19 and Brexit have won. I believe I can still contribute and with your permission I’d like to try one more year as a steward.

Comments about Green Giant edit

Keep ~~Will miss you, thanks for all the work placed into this movement, happy retirement. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)~~ Keep, with much gladness to see you volunteering one more year, all interactions are positive with you. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 19:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to commen with Keep -jkb- 14:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~I loved working with them, unfortunate to see. Good luck with everything! —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)~~ I really am sorry for your losses Green Giant. You're a strong person and I admire your drive to help better our community. That being said, my fullest Keep. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 19:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for your service. Miniapolis 16:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~TYFYS. ミラP@Miraclepine 17:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)~~[reply]

Switch to Keep in light of recent developments. ミラP@Miraclepine 19:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your past work, and all the best with your future. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Courtesy ping to @Ajraddatz, Miniapolis, and Atcovi:. Might want to refine your comments in light of the recent developments. Thanks. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yes, you were inactive (and I noticed that you intended to resign on en.wn). However, your reasoning is also acceptable, and I don't mind giving a chance. Leaderboard (talk) 19:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active steward. I'm sorry for your lost family members. Can continue for next year. I wish you were clear about your candidacy, but it isn't problem for me. --Uncitoyen^talk 19:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep For sure. 1989 (talk) 19:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep! Majavah (talk!) 19:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 20:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep then in that case :) --IWI (talk) 20:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Count Count (talk) 21:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep having representation for vegetarians in the steward group is important. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sure. Meiræ 02:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sorry to hear about your family members. Java Hurricane 02:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 03:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sorry to hear about your losses. Legoktm (talk) 06:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 06:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 08:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 08:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Luke 081515 16:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Mirer (talk) 23:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Mirer: Any particular reason? --IWI (talk) 21:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, please stay stronger than COVID and Brexit — NickK (talk) 13:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I don't see any problems. -- CptViraj (talk) 13:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nehaoua (talk) 23:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 20:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --LexICon (talk) 01:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mykola7 (talk) 21:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 23:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 13:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Having lost a relative in December to the covid19 plague, I appeal to you to remain active here, to the extent possible. JGHowes ^talk - 16:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 19:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 16:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AGK ■ 22:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 16:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 08:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. --Dostojewskij (talk) 22:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kein Einstein (talk) 19:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 02:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Thanks for staying with us and I am happy to learn that you have recovered well.—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 20:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 13:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 18:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sorry for your losses. I respect your commitment and dedication to keep contributing here. --Charitwo (talk) 19:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --DannyS712 (talk) 19:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 10:56, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:39, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HakanIST edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: tr, en-4, az-3, es-2, de-1
Personal info: Hello everyone. I'm a steward since 2017 and this is 4th time I run for confirmations. I'd like to serve another year as a steward. My activity has been moderate and I've remained reachable. I plan to increase that for the following year focusing on preventing spam/vandalism on Wikimedia projects.--HakanIST (talk) 06:07, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about HakanIST edit

Keep Can be more active, but this is good enough. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He tried to be active as a steward in this year. --Uncitoyen^talk 14:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mehman 97 15:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --ToprakM ^✉ 16:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 16:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Sakhalinio (talk) 17:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. With hope that activity will increase. Meiræ 02:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 02:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 06:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 08:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 08:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 09:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--evrifaessa ❯❯❯ talk 18:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 23:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, useful activity — NickK (talk) 13:13, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep LuCkY^talk 14:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --justinianus 17:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I don't see any problems. -- CptViraj (talk) 13:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- 94rain ^Talk 04:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lymantria (talk) 13:29, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nehaoua (talk) 23:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 20:56, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Zangala (talk) 10:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 23:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Victor Trevor (talk) 13:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep /Julle (talk) 20:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Satirdan kahraman (talk) 22:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. chansey ^message? 13:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 19:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 16:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:07, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --AGK ■ 22:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 08:41, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 16:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. --Dostojewskij (talk) 22:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 02:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. Very silent royal person. --Derslek (talk) 15:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Joalpe (talk) 10:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 20:54, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove—-Coffins (talk) 21:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 18:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 19:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hoo man edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: de-n, en-3
Personal info: I have been a Wikimedian since 2008 and a steward since 2014. On top of that, I am or have been active in various other areas around Wikimedia, most notably by working on Wikidata and by doing various tech things (user scripts, MediaWiki extensions, ...).
Besides my volunteer activities, I'm employed by Wikimedia Germany as software developer for Wikidata.
After reduced activity in the second half of 2020, I will increase my activity again. I plan to continue helping out with both on wiki work and by tackling steward related technical issues. Cheers, Hoo man (talk) 22:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Hoo man edit

Remove - entirely absent from May to January, that's most of the year and is not active enough to retain stewardship. Rs chen 7754 14:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I find the comments below bizarre. Hoo man's activity has been on the low side for several years, and they had Wikidata and Meta administrator rights removed earlier this year for inactivity. I don't really care whether he was on IRC or not (I don't go on IRC much anymore so I don't know) - the main purpose of being a steward is using the tools. --Rs chen 7754 01:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Personally, I think being a steward is more than just using the tools. I'm also happy to give anyone a pass on being inactive because just about everyone had a disastrous IRL this year, and that's okay. Legoktm (talk) 06:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - I have to push back on this trope, because it promotes the notion that being a steward is a status symbol, which is against how Wikimedia works. I'm not opposed to breaks during the year (I even took one myself), but when you spend 2/3 of your term almost inactive and the remaining 1/3 with a few spambot multilocks a month, that's a problem. --Rs chen 7754 06:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      - I meant there are plenty of other things stewards do besides just performing logged actions (how I interpreted "using the tools"). Legoktm (talk) 11:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Still acceptable as I seen them here and there, but this is a weak keep. If confirmed I hope you will be more active this year on. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Camouflaged Mirage. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - acceptable - -jkb- 14:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question Hi, the discussion at Requests for comment/Site-wide administrator abuse and WP:PILLARS violations on the Croatian Wikipedia has been pending a close for the entirety of the last term, and has not had any Steward significantly discuss with the participants its status, despite a couple of requests and the more recent passing of the meta-rfc policy. Could you explain why a) you and b) the Stewards as a whole, failed to close (and, as applicable, execute, it)? As a connected point to the most likely answers (too complicated, insufficiently clear remedies, not in remit, etc) could you clarify both why it/they apply but also why you/the Stewards didn't make that known to every participant and ask for specific actions taken to make it possible for the Stewards to act on it, despite the insane timescale? Nosebagbear (talk) 14:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Rschen --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep long-term trusted user.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, assuming good faith about promised increase in activity. Miniapolis 16:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for inactivity. * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Luke 081515 22:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Remove -- dwf² ✉ 01:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep weakly hoping activity returns this year. Java Hurricane 02:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak

Keep. Serious inactivity concerns though. I hope promise to be active will be delivered on. Meiræ 02:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep willing to give the benefit of the doubt since they have returned, noting the commitment above to become more active. --IWI (talk) 03:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 06:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 08:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Hoo man's activity has been at this same level for the last few years (was a little more active between 2018-2019). That's why I was neutral in Hoo man's confirmation last year. But I think this activity has turned into a habit. As Rschen said, I don't remember seeing him much last year. So I can't support for this year unfortunately. --Uncitoyen^talk 13:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Cirdan (talk) 14:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ra'ike (talk) 22:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Mirer (talk) 23:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:10, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gereon K. (talk) 08:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I would be happy to see him continue for one more year — NickK (talk) 13:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JackPotte (talk) 17:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep cool wäre ein Klick :) --Itti (talk) 22:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Helfmann (talk) 15:57, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per Meiræ. -- CptViraj (talk) 13:18, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --MarcelBuehner (talk) 22:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Rschen7754 + only about 20 edits last year. — Ddxfx 04:03, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Graphikus (talk) 22:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geolina163 (talk) 18:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Wim b 20:56, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep it is hard to blame anyone for 2020, so I won't, but since this is a recurring issue I hope they do manage to commit more. --Base (talk) 23:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep /Julle (talk) 20:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 13:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --AGK ■ 22:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 16:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for inactivity, and otherwise per Rschen7754. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 20:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. --Dostojewskij (talk) 22:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kein Einstein (talk) 19:37, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Snookerado (talk) 20:35, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Regiomontanus (talk) 03:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wetterwolke (talk) 12:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱

Keep --Hardenacke (talk) 14:29, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

_{C L @ S}˲» 13:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove per Rschen7754 - I appreciate 2020 was a tough year for everyone but taking half a year away is unacceptable. User could also re-vnaish again. –Davey2010^Talk 20:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—---Coffins (talk) 21:07, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Activity levels v. poor. ——SerialNumber54129 17:36, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --1971markus (talk) 18:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The candidate expressed intention to increase activity again, so I'm not particularly concerned about the activity level issue. --Yair rand (talk) 05:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 18:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep After reviewing some of the comments here not in favor, I think I'm going to err on the side of assuming good faith and take them at their word that they'll bring activity in 2021. Last year was difficult for a lot of people and to write off COVID as an inexcusable reason for reduced activity is not assuming good faith, if it weren't for that I'd probably agree with removal, but these are unprecedented times. --Charitwo (talk) 19:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --DannyS712 (talk) 19:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nadzik (talk) 08:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Taivo (talk) 09:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 10:57, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Kolbert edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en, fr, es-2, de-1
Personal info:
Like most other stewards, my activity and availability has been affected by the pandemic. I would still like to help out where I can, as there is plenty of maintenance work and improvements we can make to improve processes and tools used to protect projects from LTAs.
Separate from the pandemic, I have been a bit discouraged by the lack of response from the Foundation to address a language/translation issue which would greatly improve accessibility for those who don't speak English so they can understand why they cannot edit a page or why they are blocked, and the necessary steps to get an exemption etc. if necessary.
Despite there being 11 Wikimedia Foundation staff on the Language and Translation team, no substantive action has been taken on this task since October 2020, nor the closely related task filed in January 2020. Should this still be a problem next year I can say with near certainty that I would not stand for re-confirmation on the basis that the Foundation does not adequately listen to or support the communities which produce and maintain the integrity all of the content that make the WMF relevant. Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:18, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Jon Kolbert edit

Keep Proxies work is enough for me, still fairly active elsewhere. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep excellent work in detecting and gblocking proxies. Blablubbs (talk) 14:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 14:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 15:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 16:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I support stewards who have pet moose. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Barkeep49 (talk) 18:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep KevinL (aka L235 · t) 18:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ToBeFree (talk) 22:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep of course! – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for your work! -- Lekha ki 01:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 02:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Highly active in gblocking. Meiræ 02:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 06:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 08:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 08:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Johannnes89 (talk) 10:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Most active steward of 2020. Jon Kolbert is especially helpful in global blocks for proxies. --Uncitoyen^talk 13:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--باسم (talk) 17:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Michel Bakni (talk) 17:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 23:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, useful activity on global blocks — NickK (talk) 13:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Whiteguru (talk) 07:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Iluvatar (talk) 00:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nehaoua (talk) 23:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 20:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --LexICon (talk) 01:17, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Zangala (talk) 10:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 23:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Faisal ^talk 05:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AVSmalnad77 ^talk 04:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 13:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 19:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 08:32, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:08, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --AGK ■ 22:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Jules ^Talk 10:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 16:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. --Dostojewskij (talk) 22:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 03:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 02:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pedram^Talk 08:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 20:58, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—-Coffins (talk) 21:11, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cabayi (talk) 14:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Yair rand (talk) 05:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 13:52, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 19:25, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 10:57, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:42, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jyothis edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages:
Personal info: Fellow Wikimedians, 2020 was certainly an interesting year for the whole world and that has certainly affected many of our activism here in the wiki world. We have made progress as human race in the fight against pandemic and hoping to be back to normal a bit in 2021. It has been my privilege to support the community and project in this role since 2010 and if the community still trusts me with the tools, I am happy to continue for another term.

Comments about Jyothis edit

~~Remove~~ - so sorry about this but I think a complete break from May to August and then another from August to January, plus minimal activity in between, is not active enough to retain stewardship. --Rs chen 7754 14:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral I am concerned that a steward has more support who has even less activity. --Rs chen 7754 03:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per Rschen7754, sadly I don't see sufficient activity. I did see some so I am not entirely asking for removal, but not enough for weak keep. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Taivo: You made a good point about him not being admin anywhere, any idea when he loses his adminship? Thanks much.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Apparently 10 years back Leaderboard (talk) 18:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - @Leaderboard: Thanks. I will think this is something Electcom needs to think of, if they run for SE now they cannot qualify (although former sysops can) but technically no one will support such a candidate to pass the SE. On the otherhand, this issue is quite old and was not an issue for previous confirmations. So on the overall, I am still neutral on this. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Unfortunately I agree with Rschen. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep had nothing but positive experiences. Lack of activity on its own is not in itself a concern for me. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Rschen --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral inactivity is a concern but they're a useful steward. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per above. Not active enough. --IWI (talk) 15:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 2020 was a horrendous year for everyone in the world. I'm not going to hold activity levels of a consistently productive Steward against them. Praxidicae (talk) 15:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, assuming good faith about promised increase in activity. Miniapolis 16:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for inactivity. * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. 2020 was 2020; a good faith intent to increase their activity is enough in my opinion. Perryprog (talk) 19:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Not enough activity. --Count Count (talk) 21:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Luke 081515 22:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove ToBeFree (talk) 22:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Stïnger （会話） 00:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Remove -- dwf² ✉ 01:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove unfortunately, needs more activity. Java Hurricane 02:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC) Reconsidering: Keep. 2020 was a bad year for all of us, AGF that Jyothis will increase activity in 2021. Java Hurricane 03:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. Was decently active in 2019 so I am willing to give a chance. Meiræ 03:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Totally fine giving a pass on inactivity in 2020. Legoktm (talk) 06:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 06:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't think this user was inactive before, and am hence willing to give a chance. I also echo Praxidicae's comment in that 2020 could be given greater leeway than usual. Leaderboard (talk) 08:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Last year was a sudden and hard year for everyone. From all his contributions so far, I hope that he will continue this year. --mirinano (talk) 08:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 2020 has been a difficult year for everyone, I agree with Praxidicae--Lemure Saltante (talk) 13:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jyothis tried to be active in 2020 until August. Then became little active again in January 2021. There are 322 global actions between 1 March 2020 and 17 January 2021. You can check xtools for this. It was this date that I created the total list for my own assessment. There are 161 loginwiki CUs in 2020. For Jyothis, we can't say that it was inactive within last 6 months per steward policy. There is a 4-5 month period between August and January. Since Jyothis was more active in the past years, some long intervals this year can be skipped for me. --Uncitoyen^talk 13:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Mirer (talk) 23:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - hiatus is allowed for horrible years, as long as there are consistent activities normally. --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 04:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Perryprog. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 2020年は特に現実世界での活動が必要だということを考慮。--Kocgs (talk) 08:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove,I don't feel any presence in here.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the user was still somewhat active in 2020, and well, limited activity due to the pandemics sounds like a reasonable excuse — NickK (talk) 13:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the user was still somewhat active in 2020 pandemic aside, should stay. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per many above. 2020 is tough for many of us. Hope their activity can gradually get back to normal this year. -- 94rain ^Talk 07:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Minorax (talk) 09:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I am happy with the explanation. --Base (talk) 23:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 23:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I am neutral, according to comments. chansey ^message? 13:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AVSmalnad77 ^talk 04:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove You are not an administrator anywhere. This is not explained. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --AGK ■ 22:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 16:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for inactivity. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 20:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. --Dostojewskij (talk) 22:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:47, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Appreciate 2020 was a tough year for us all however there's an unacceptable amount of inactivity here that cannot be ignored. –Davey2010^Talk 21:05, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove as not an admin and almost not a steward. ——SerialNumber54129 17:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Kiran Gopi (talk) 03:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --DannyS712 (talk) 19:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per my comment here, I'm going to assume good faith and keep. --Charitwo (talk) 19:27, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nadzik (talk) 08:07, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 10:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:43, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Krd has resigned, and as such, his confirmation process was stopped by the Election Committee.. For the ElectCom, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Krd edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: de, en-3
Personal info: Dear community,
I would like to request renewal of my steward permissions.
After one year my activity was nearly as intended one year ago, i.e. a little bit of everything with some focus on OTRS tickets, where I created around 6000 answers in the Stewards queue, with is around 75% of the total amount. As this was quite a lot of work, my onwiki steward actions may appear a bit lower than they should.
Regarding my other roles, I think I'm still active above average in each of them, so I would like to ask for being confirmed.
Thank you, yours --Krd 08:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Krd edit

Remove. Krd unfortunately is not suited to be part of the team. He has problems dealing with opposition to his actions, while also reverting fellow colleagues without talking to them. Has a track record of poor responses/handling of them on stewards OTRS, granting GIPBE for LTAs in multiple instances, and replying to the emails with templates that are not accurate for the incoming email. —Thanks for the fish! ^{talk•contribs} 14:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Tks4Fish and Praxidicae: Not that I don't believe you but this might be more convincing to other voters if it provided examples of public actions where possible. --Rs chen 7754 15:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - The sheer number of ipbe grants to ltas, for starters. Here is a recent one (of many) when an inappropriate GIPBE was granted following a CU block and was discussed extensively here. Praxidicae (talk) 15:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 14:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC), trustable long time wikipedian[reply]
Question Hi, the discussion at Requests for comment/Site-wide administrator abuse and WP:PILLARS violations on the Croatian Wikipedia has been pending a close for the entirety of the last term, and has not had any Steward significantly discuss with the participants its status, despite a couple of requests and the more recent passing of the meta-rfc policy. Could you explain why a) you and b) the Stewards as a whole, failed to close (and, as applicable, execute, it)? As a connected point to the most likely answers (too complicated, insufficiently clear remedies, not in remit, etc) could you clarify both why it/they apply but also why you/the Stewards didn't make that known to every participant and ask for specific actions taken to make it possible for the Stewards to act on it, despite the insane timescale? Nosebagbear (talk) 14:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Nosebagbear, thank you for the question. I think there are a lot of factors that come together. To keep it as short as possible: A case of such size likely should not be evaluated by a single steward, and stewards as a group failed to agree on any reasonable solution. In the end my personal opinion is that the discussion should be closed without a result, and perhaps started from the beginning, not least because the situation changed a bit since the discussion started. --Krd 15:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Krd: thank you for your quick answer - was there a reason the group didn't let the participants know that no closure was going to be forthcoming, along with some suggestions that might perhaps have helped a resolution be found as opposed to now having to recommence the whole thing and chuck a huge amount of editor hours? Nosebagbear (talk) 15:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not aware of any specific reason. --Krd 15:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral concerned about the lack of responding, as raised here. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove and stongly so. Krd lacks the competence necessary to be a steward. Praxidicae (talk) 15:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --IWI (talk) 15:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. Per Tks4Fish. --Galahad (sasageyo!)^(esvoy) 16:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Per Tks4Fish and Praxidicae. SQL ^{Query me!} 16:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Too many significant concerns to support. Miniapolis 16:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I wrote this when opposing your 2020 Steward candidature: "I felt you as someone who would struggle a bit in this role.". Sadly, it appears to be true. That being said, I am surprised that any steward is at risk to this extent, and hence hope you resolve the mistakes as Tks4Fish and Praxidicae pointed out. It's borderline oppose. Leaderboard (talk) 17:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Tks4Fish + this is not what I expect from a steward. 1989 (talk) 17:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From the Election Committee: Krd has resigned. Steward requests/Permissions#Krd@global. — regards, Revi 17:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Krd for your service, even if it ended this way. I think that the resignation shows integrity in light of the allegations made here, and I hope that you continue your involvement with the movement in other ways. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- +1.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- +2 Mardetanha (talk) 17:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- +3, I regret this step, regards -jkb- 17:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- agreed, thanks for your work. Stryn (talk) 18:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your service --DannyS712 (talk) 18:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your effort. --Uncitoyen^talk 18:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- --Rs chen 7754 20:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- , thanks for your service. Java Hurricane 02:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it shows "integrity", personally it felt like a bizarre rage-quit, unfortunately. Leaderboard (talk) 20:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your service. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 07:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. Unfortunately, he was not suited for the position, I thought. --痛心疾首 (talk) 03:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 06:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your work! --Johannnes89 (talk) 11:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for you work :) -- CptViraj (talk) 11:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep why not? --Agathenon (talk) 15:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Sorry, but i can't support you. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 21:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Linedwell edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: fr, en-3, it-2
Personal info: Dear community,
This year again, I would like to request renewal of my steward permissions for a sixth term. During last year I was mainly active on SRG and SRP requests. This year, due to some schedule changes outside of the Wikis, I haven't be active in small wiki monitoring at all.
If I am confirmed as a steward, I plan to continue my activity on requests pages as well as giving a hand on 2020 admin activity review process as the previous years. Thank you, Linedwell ^[talk] 10:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Linedwell edit

Keep But a weak one, this year Linedwell isn't that active, but I still see some glimpse of activities here and there, will hope they will be more active if confirmed. They are pleasant to work with in the past.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 16:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ToBeFree (talk) 22:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meiræ 03:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 06:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active steward for me. Maybe Linedwell did more rename than some global renamers and other most stewards. Especially helped at this point for renamer requests from French Wikipedia. --Uncitoyen^talk 14:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 23:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good at small wiki monitoring — NickK (talk) 13:19, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Omondi (talk) 13:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JackPotte (talk) 17:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I don't see any problems. -- CptViraj (talk) 13:23, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nehaoua (talk) 23:04, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 20:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Zangala (talk) 10:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 23:12, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Hadrianus (talk) 14:08, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Thibaut (talk) 16:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 09:49, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --AGK ■ 22:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --GrandCelinien (talk) 08:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Jules ^Talk 10:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 16:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Dostojewskij (talk) 22:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 02:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:47, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 21:13, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 19:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:07, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 10:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:43, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MarcoAurelio edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: es, en-2, fr-1 (can read and understand texts in an, ast, ca, gl, pt and few other romanic languages).
Personal info: Hello. On 2020 I've been active on various areas, focusing mainly on cross-wiki countervandalism, maintenance/housekeeping and anti-spam activities as well as responding to on-wiki requests of various types. I've also helped with the yearly admin activity review checks and the bot policy implementation, among other miscellaneous stewards' tasks (e.g. renaming users, clearing some backlogs, discussions, etc.). I think I can still be of service, and I'd like to volunteer for another term if the community think that's okay. Thank you. Best regards.

Comments about MarcoAurelio edit

Keep, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, competent and helpful. Blablubbs (talk) 14:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course, as per normal, helpful and active all around. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Helpful and dedicated steward. Sa vh ^ñ 14:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep mola mucho. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 14:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep An active steward in every area. Also very helpful in AAR works. --Uncitoyen^talk 14:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very good steward••Pierpao (talk) 14:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mehman 97 15:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the most helpful stewards around. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sotiale (talk) 15:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Saroj Uprety (talk) 15:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --ToprakM ^✉ 16:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yup! --Galahad (sasageyo!)^(esvoy) 16:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 16:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — xaosflux ^Talk 19:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Count Count (talk) 21:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ToBeFree (talk) 22:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Eres sin duda de gran ayuda. --Stïnger （会話） 00:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep - of course! Thanks for your continued work. – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Active, helpful and competent. No concerns. Meiræ 03:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Awesome. Legoktm (talk) 06:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 06:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Mtarch11 (talk) 07:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A very competent and active steward. --Sîmbotin (talk) 08:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 08:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because we love cats! --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 11:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--باسم (talk) 17:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Michel Bakni (talk) 17:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ibrahim.ID ✪ 17:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Esteban (talk) 14:41, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BACKGROUND: on 2 December 2020 you globally locked a user as an LTA (long term abuser). The Global account information indicates that this user registered an account on 3 November 2020 and has contributed a total of 50 edits and was blocked only on Meta.

This user came to my attention when they asked a newbie-type question on 5 November 2020 at the Village pump of the en-wikiquote. The same user posted a follow-up question on my user-talk on 12 November 2020.

It was only by a coincidence that I discovered this user was globally blocked as an LTA within less than a month of registration. Since I thought this was a potential new contributor I was curious to see what this user did to deserve the reception they got from our community.

According to the Global account information which is linked from the newbie's contributions page, you, MarcoAurelio, were the only admin involved in the blocking of this user on META, where the user made only one contribution to Wikimedia Forum on December 2 shortly before being blocked by you.

QUESTIONS:

What is the definition of LTA ?
Do stewards consult the documentation in regards to LTAs before blocking users for this offence? If so where is the documentation?
Where can the community view and participate in discussions about blocking particular users for Long Term Abuse?
What is the appeal procedure?
Can any concerned user start an appeal procedureon behalf of a globally locked user?

Thanks in advance, Ottawahitech (talk) 18:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to answer.

Regarding the account FCoonerBCA, they're far from being a newbie, because they're another sockpuppet account of Huik01, which has been abusing multiple accounts since 2009, that is, 11 years. The sockpuppetry was confirmed based on non-public tecnical evidence after a request, so I cannot share more details on that specific.

There's no formal definition of what an long-term abuse[r] is. We have to use our judgement to decide when a global lock is or is not appropriate, usually based on precedent and common practice. Of course, global blocks are there to stop vandalism/abuse so if there's no abuse, no global lock will be issued. The same is true if the abuse does not ammount to a level where individual communities can manage the case themselves. There's an information page with common reasons that have been used to request global locks but it's not a closed list. People can request global locks and unlocks at Steward requests/Global, and a steward will consider the request. Global locks can also be the result of a global ban, but those are always after community discussion and consensus (except those done by the Wikimedia Foundation pursuant the WMF Global Ban Policy and the Terms of Use; the community plays no role in those although some of those may be eligible for review). Locked users can inquire and appeal their global locks by email to our OTRS queue. Any user can ask the stewards to reconsider a global lock in the Steward requests/Global page. While Meta does not have any formal prohibition against proxying, it's best if the locked user themself addresses their concerns directly to us as usually we'll have questions that are best answered by the concerned user.

Regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MarcoAurelio: Thanks for reponding. I have checked some of the links you provided, and am wondering if it is possible a mistake was made somwhere along the way?

Here is what I found so far:

USER:Huik01 was globally locked 11 years ago. This means he cannot even log in to any WMF-wiki. Before being globally locked Huik01 was indef-blocked on enwiki in 2009 as a 'Vandalism-only account and his talk-page access was removed immediately. The admin who single-handedly carried both blocking actions (User:Tnxman307) is "Retired" according to their enwiki userpage.

On enWikinews Huik01 was indef-blocked because of: Abusing multiple accounts: Sock of banned troll" by User:Blood Red Sandman who according to their enWN userpage is no longer an admin.

On enSimple Huik01 was indef-blocked because of: blocked on other projects as well as other reasons by User:Juliancolton who is no longer an admin on ensimple but is still an admin at both enwiki and commons.

Can you shed more light on this situation? Thanks in advance, Ottawahitech (talk) 17:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but I cannot really know what motivates somebody to either keep contributing or not for any period of time, or keep infringing upon community rules and sanctions for so long either. Huik01's enwiki talk page was not removed immediatelly as you claim: only after abusing their talk page posting homophobic edit summaries and racist slurs the admin revoked their talk page access. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding, MarcoAurelio. Yes those edits which you have linked to are pretty bad. As far as talk page was not removed immediatelly according to my calculation only eight minutes elapsed between the time Huik01 was blocked and the time his usertalkpage access was removed. According to the enwiki block log: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/block?page=User:Huik01 Huik01 was blocked on 18:37, 28 December 2009 and their user-talk-page access was removed on 18:45, 28 December 2009. Ottawahitech (talk) 01:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep--. HombreDHojalata.^{T A L K} 21:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Platonides (talk) 23:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 23:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, experienced and helpful — NickK (talk) 13:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Mantener por supuesto :) --IWI (talk) 21:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep cool wäre ein Klick :) --Itti (talk) 22:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.--جار الله (talk) 02:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Iluvatar (talk) 00:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 13:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- 94rain ^Talk 04:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --SDKmac (talk) 13:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nehaoua (talk) 23:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Em-mustapha ^{User | talk} 23:43, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 02:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 20:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Zangala (talk) 10:37, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taichi - (あ！) 16:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Maestro Ivanković 19:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mykola7 (talk) 21:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 23:12, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 08:49, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 15:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep /Julle (talk) 20:13, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Satirdan kahraman (talk) 22:31, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep chansey ^message? 17:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JMCC1 (talk) 02:10, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 09:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 14:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 19:51, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AGK ■ 22:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nioger (talk) 06:03, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Jules ^Talk 10:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 16:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. --Dostojewskij (talk) 22:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 02:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --YaganZ (talk) 19:36, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 21:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 04:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cabayi (talk) 14:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --LuchoCR (talk) 19:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Yair rand (talk) 05:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 13:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:01, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 19:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:46, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:08, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 10:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mardetanha edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages:
Personal info: Dear WMF Community, it has been a great pleasure for me to serve the community for the past 10 years as a steward, like the past couple of years I was mainly active in the field of fighting and long-term abusers and spambots, I was regularly available on IRC for emergency occasions and monitoring Small wikis and helping urgent requests. Given my stable status in life, I would like to serve the community for another year. Mardetanha (talk) 15:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Mardetanha edit

Keep Per good activities and prompt help in IRC requests, thanks for serving. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep My concerns last year were addressed and Mardetanha has been a great help! Praxidicae (talk) 14:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 14:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Praxidicae. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question Hi, the discussion at Requests for comment/Site-wide administrator abuse and WP:PILLARS violations on the Croatian Wikipedia has been pending a close for the entirety of the last term, and has not had any Steward significantly discuss with the participants its status, despite a couple of requests and the more recent passing of the meta-rfc policy. Could you explain why a) you and b) the Stewards as a whole, failed to close (and, as applicable, execute, it)? As a connected point to the most likely answers (too complicated, insufficiently clear remedies, not in remit, etc) could you clarify both why it/they apply but also why you/the Stewards didn't make that known to every participant and ask for specific actions taken to make it possible for the Stewards to act on it, despite the insane timescale? Nosebagbear (talk) 15:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From what I know Wikimedia foundation is working on the case, probably Trust and Safety team can provide a better update of the case. Mardetanha (talk) 15:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mehman 97 15:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems to have improved from previous confirmations. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 17:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Sakhalinio (talk) 17:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He tried to be active in 2020. No concerns. --Uncitoyen^talk 19:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep - Thanks for staying on despite the dramahs last year. – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meiræ 03:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 06:59, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 08:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 00:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gereon K. (talk) 08:19, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, hope last year's drama is behind — NickK (talk) 13:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- 94rain ^Talk 07:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nehaoua (talk) 23:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Fjmustak (talk) 22:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Em-mustapha ^{User | talk} 23:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ++Lar: t/c 00:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- ARASH PT talk 13:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 20:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Zangala (talk) 10:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Mark7747 (talk) 13:32, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --In fact ( contact ) 16:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. Unless one can indicate any change in the location of this steward, I cannot support having those sensitive permissions in the hands of someone residing in Iran (much like I would not support having a steward from Russia), and, seeing the future outcome of this vote, can only wish that they will be staying safe from their own government in their next tenure. (My vote is to remove because leaving this to chance of never discovering this potential asset seems irresponsible to our movement.) stjn^[ru] 22:16, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 23:12, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 15:13, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep /Julle (talk) 20:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Satirdan kahraman (talk) 22:38, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 11:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep chansey ^message? 13:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 14:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 19:51, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AGK ■ 22:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. I do not trust a Steward who not only closed an RFC contrary to consensus, they admitted receiving a financial package dependent upon closing in that manner. The RFC was Meta Do something about azwiki, the closing diff, and the close briefly alludes to the financial package where they say they will be traveling to Azerbaycan this month (with WMF support). Anyone with a direct financial conflict of interest has absolutely no business selecting themselves as closer - if they disagreed with consensus or they wanted to propose a different solution then they should have posted as a participant. Anyone who would preform a financial-conflict-of-interest close has no business being a Steward. Alsee (talk) 13:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is comment is both insulting to me and to Wikimedia Foundation, The Foundation's travel grant process is completely separate from T&S or any other part of the Foundation. The assumption that it is one giant, a homogeneous organization is wrong. Mardetanha (talk) 14:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I never said the Travel Grant was part of T&S. I never said the Foundation was homogeneous. I said I don't trust you to be a Steward, because you should have known not to close the RFC when you had a direct financial conflict of interest. You would not have received the grant $$$ had the RFC been closed in accordance with consensus.

If it was simply a mistake and you failed to notice the conflict of interest, you should have immediately withdrawn the close when that conflict was brought to your attention. Instead you refused, arguing that grant $$$ "was/is not something of value".[2] Alsee (talk) 16:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is more assuring for me that you don't understand what you are talking about, I am disgusted by your comment Mardetanha (talk) 06:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral. --Dostojewskij (talk) 22:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 02:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. Very impulsive and very well manipulated person to be intermediary in any questions. --Derslek (talk) 15:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pedram^Talk 08:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~~(Opposing based on nationality is absurd and should be ignored in its entiriety)~~ –Davey2010^Talk 21:15, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Davey2010: As you have commented on my vote, I would just like to comment that not wanting to have global CU permissions vested in someone who can be imprisoned for no apparent reason if the state wishes so is not absurd. Especially, as was mentioned on previous re-election, in someone with public profile that is even easier to find. stjn^[ru] 18:51, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Wow my sincere apologies stjn, I had an inkling things were bad but didn't realise they were that bad. Comment struck, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 19:30, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ― ANKAN (talk) 05:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cabayi (talk) 14:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove the RfC/grant = dodgy business. ——SerialNumber54129 17:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --DannyS712 (talk) 19:27, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 19:30, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nadzik (talk) 08:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:46, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Urbanec edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: cs, en-3
Personal info: Dear community,
This is my first confirmation as a Wikimedia Steward. As I still enjoy doing the stewardry work, I would like to continue in a next term. I don't have a dedicated area of stewardry work to focus on, and I always try to help wherever I can.
Outside of my steward role, I'm a Czech Wikipedia administrator, bureaucrat and checkuser. In the last year, my list of homewikis got expanded, as I'm now also a Wikidata administrator. I'm also active at Wikimedia Phabricator.
Disclaimer: I'm a Wikimedia Foundation contractor, working as a Czech Wikipedia community ambassador for the Growth team. For more details, see my staff userpage.

Comments about Martin Urbanec edit

Keep, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Your first reconfirmation? Really? I thought you had already been a steward for several years, which is definitely a good sign. Naleksuh (talk) 14:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, active and helpful. Giraffer (talk) 14:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Praxidicae (talk) 14:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure, one of the most active, helpful stewards around. Highly competent, glad to have you on always. So kind to me when dispensing advices, what a wonderful steward. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, active, competent, helpful. Blablubbs (talk) 14:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The casting of aspersions regarding the CU checks below is disgusting. Legitimate accusations should be referred to the OC. --Rs chen 7754 01:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The one of most active steward in 2020. Has a good job in cross-wiki issues. --Uncitoyen^talk 14:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for your work in 2020!Zblace (talk) 14:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, really helpful. Stryn (talk) 14:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very helpful on IRC with locking LTAs and other blocks/locks I have requested. --IWI (talk) 14:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Yining Chen (Talk) 14:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Majavah (talk!) 14:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 14:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thank you for everything. Respectfully, --Yuri Krestinichev (talk) 14:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Arash ツ 14:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question Hi, the discussion at Requests for comment/Site-wide administrator abuse and WP:PILLARS violations on the Croatian Wikipedia has been pending a close for the entirety of the last term, and has not had any Steward significantly discuss with the participants its status, despite a couple of requests and the more recent passing of the meta closure of rfc policy. Could you explain why a) you and b) the Stewards as a whole, failed to close (and, as applicable, execute, it)? As a connected point to the most likely answers (too complicated, insufficiently clear remedies, not in remit, etc) could you clarify both why it/they apply but also why you/the Stewards didn't make that known to every participant and ask for specific actions taken to make it possible for the Stewards to act on it, despite the insane timescale? Nosebagbear (talk) 15:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Amanda (aka DQ) 15:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active, trusted and no concerns from me. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | enwiki} 15:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mehman 97 15:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep easy to talk to, kind and overall extremely helpful. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Robins7 (talk) 15:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Saroj Uprety (talk) 15:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --ToprakM ^✉ 16:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trusted user --Jan Myšák (talk) 16:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Absolutely, no concerns. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 1989 (talk) 17:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 17:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 17:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ented (talk) 18:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Barkeep49 (talk) 18:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Helpful; no concerns. ネイ (talk) 18:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep KevinL (aka L235 · t) 18:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — xaosflux ^Talk 19:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Definitely. --Count Count (talk) 21:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Luke 081515 22:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Hell, no! It is simply impossible to treat 30.000 CU (!!!!) within the scope of our rules during this time. Even if you convert that to days, there are more than 80 (!!!) daily. How should that work responsibly? Many other critical things also got through to me. In the position completely untenable. 30,000 CU are misuse of this tool. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Marcus Cyron I would like to explain why the number is so high. Right now, global locks do not have any autoblock-like mechanism, like it exists for local blocks (this was suggested several times in community wishlist, but still is not implemented). To prevent spambots and vandalbots from simply creating another account, locked accounts are usually CU'ed at loginwiki, to globally block the IP. In the last year, I locked thousands of spambots, and blocked thousands of heavily abused IPs, thanks to LWCU. Without CU'ing the spambots, it would not be possible, and they would probably just bot-create another account and continue their vandalism. Martin Urbanec (talk) 00:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep Thanks for all your great work --Superpes15 (talk) 00:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - highly active and helpful. – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. One of the most active stewards in 2020. Helpful in all areas and competent. No concerns. Meiræ 03:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 04:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Awesome. Legoktm (talk) 06:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose On Czech Wikipedia he randomly checks IPs of users who did nothing to have their IPs checked.--Auvajs (talk) 06:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- How do you know if you are not a checkuserer there? --MF-W 01:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - @MF-Warburg: See this, only 1 of 4 arbiters agreed his CU check was OK.--Auvajs (talk) 14:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Mtarch11 (talk) 07:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the most active and helpful stewards. --Sîmbotin (talk) 08:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 08:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 09:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Johannnes89 (talk) 11:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - because of problematic behavior on Czech wiki to me. -- Karelj (talk) 16:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--باسم (talk) 17:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Michel Bakni (talk) 17:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--evrifaessa ❯❯❯ talk 18:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted, competent, and responsive. Thank you for your service!! Waggie (talk) 20:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 00:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very helpful and prompt! --Ivi104 (talk) 00:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, strong activity, keep going — NickK (talk) 13:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sun8908 (talk) 05:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Iluvatar (talk) 00:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Mautpreller (talk) 09:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC). I am not satisfied with the steward's answer to the huge number of CU conducted within one year. A mighty tool jeopardizing data protection should definitely not be used in this "mass production" form.[reply]
He's a long-standing sysadmin. He probably sees IP addresses scattered across production logs anyway. Except on Wikipedia the idea of IP address sensitivity is not that great in most organisations. People working in systems will see them all the time, and nobody really cares. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 21:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep definitelyAhmetlii (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Definitely keep. He is competent and helpful on the Czech wiki, where I edit and patrol most of the time. KPX8 (talk) 23:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Summer ... hier! (talk) 10:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC) see Marcus Cyron[reply]
Keep -- 94rain ^Talk 04:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Grüße vom Sänger ♫^(Reden) 08:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Ghormon (talk) 10:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC) see Marcus Cyron[reply]
Keep --Lymantria (talk) 13:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Godihrdt (talk) 14:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC) Not with this CU record, it is neither necessary not possible to reach a point with 99 % of all spambots/vandalism accounts banned and the CU tool is to crack a nut with a sledgehammer…[reply]
Keep Of course! --Alaa :)..! 17:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nehaoua (talk) 23:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
All the way! Keep. -Em-mustapha ^{User | talk} 23:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 02:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I find it kind of hard to believe that Martin Urbanec has only been a steward for a year (are we sure? Did someone double check?) considering the enormous amount of amazing work I've seen from them. Asartea ^Talk ^{(Enwiki Talk (preferred))} 13:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 20:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Platonides (talk) 00:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --LexICon (talk) 01:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep-Manchiu (talk) 06:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Mark7747 (talk) 13:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Excellent work handling long-term abuse cases. — Newslinger talk 16:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Maestro Ivanković 19:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mykola7 (talk) 21:42, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, my only concern is for the user not to overburden themselves. --Base (talk) 23:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Q8j (talk/CA) 00:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Csigabi (talk) 12:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – My vote is not against Martin personally, he want help (and he do it), but I mean that he have too much function and in consequence of this he have too much power (and responsibility) in hands--F.ponizil (talk) 17:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Aspiriniks (talk) 06:13, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He made extraordinary effort in 2020. --Victor Trevor (talk) 13:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I like your explanation to 30 thousand CU question. Taivo (talk) 17:50, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep /Julle (talk) 20:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Faisal ^talk 05:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concern! chansey ^message? 13:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AVSmalnad77 ^talk 05:14, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 19:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Don-kun (talk) 19:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AGK ■ 22:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Jules ^Talk 10:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jagro (talk) 14:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Aŭdrea (talk) 17:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I mean that he have too much functions and in consequence of this he have too much power (and responsibility) in hands. Does not keep his promises (to have less functions). Also see Auvajs's comment. --Kusurija (talk) 20:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. 30,000 CU actions is invasive; the tool is clearly being misused as a hammer that makes every issue look like a nail to be struck with it. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 20:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Spicy (talk) 10:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. --Dostojewskij (talk) 22:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 02:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. Sběratel funkci narušující svým špatným úsudkem soukromí editorů. --Lenka64 (talk) 10:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pedram^Talk 08:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:54, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In my opinion, the CU-related concerns aren't that important, and his explanation for them seems good. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 15:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 21:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 04:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ― ANKAN (talk) 05:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cabayi (talk) 14:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: sounds like he's performing well on the Czech Wikipedia. ——SerialNumber54129 17:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The proposal to relax bot policy gave me a pause. Martin Urbanec is Czech. He should know very well that global bot JAnDbot is abused and stewards do nothing about it despite clear breach of current global bot rules. Relaxing bot rules without working safeguards further encourages abuse, the opposite of what stewards should do. — Robert Važan (talk) 05:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 13:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:27, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The CU accusations seem blown out of proportion. The usage is heavily tracked not only by fellow stewards but any misuse would be subject to OC investigation. Martin is exceptionally active in his duties and therefore his overall activity across the board will be higher than others, I see it every day on-wiki and IRC. Which brings the other concern. It's clear that his work in other areas has not affected his ability to effectively perform as a steward. I can see some opposition if his other duties made his activity substantially lower or insufficient compared with his peers but it seems he is excelling. I am happy to vote to keep for this user. --Charitwo (talk) 20:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep DraconicDark (talk) 01:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 11:00, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:46, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Masti edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: pl-N, en-4, de-3, ru-2, several European -1
Personal info: I am keeping my work in cross wiki vandalism mainly concentrating on Long Term Abusers and crosswiki spambots. Also trying to help with checkuser function on small wikis. I am easily available on stewards IRC so can react quickly on the incoming requests. I think I will be able to keep with at least same level of activity in the coming year. masti <talk> 22:17, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Masti edit

Keep, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course, all the spambot locking, and very responsive in IRC, thank you Masti :P Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Zblace (talk) 14:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 14:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mehman 97 15:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sure. --IWI (talk) 15:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Szoltys (talk) 15:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 17:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 17:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ented (talk) 18:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep PawełMM (talk) 19:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Highly active in locking. No concerns. Meiræ 03:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 08:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ffm (talk) 17:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ra'ike (talk) 22:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 00:30, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the most active stewards last year. Especially more active in global locking. --Uncitoyen^talk 06:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gereon K. (talk) 08:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good and useful activity — NickK (talk) 13:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nebydlogop (talk) 17:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep cool wäre ein Klick :) --Itti (talk)
Keep--Ghormon (talk) 11:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Gdarin | talk 14:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep AramilFeraxa (talk) 21:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 20:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hektor Absurdus (talk) 23:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --LexICon (talk) 01:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jamnik z Tarnowa (talk) 08:37, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Zangala (talk) 10:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 15:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Jacek555 (talk) 17:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 14:17, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 19:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --AGK ■ 22:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Jules ^Talk 10:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jagro (talk) 14:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:03, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. --Dostojewskij (talk) 22:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 02:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:55, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 21:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --LuchoCR (talk) 19:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 14:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~Cybularny ^Speak? 23:12, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 13:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 20:30, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
KeepManchiu (talk) 03:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, keep going! Nadzik (talk) 08:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 11:00, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Matanya edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages:
Personal info: Hello, similar to past years, I have done mainly anti-vandalism/spam and patrolling. I also help in other stewards work such as on phabricator and technical spaces like stewardsbots. In addition I am in touch with various stakeholders in the movement to help in steward-related work and advice. I'm on IRC regularly and try to be helpful. I'm planning to remain active this year. Questions and comments are welcome. Best Matanya (talk) 12:45, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Matanya edit

Keep Weak one but I see enough activities here/ there for a keep, hope you can be more active if confirmed. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 14:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Camouflaged Mirage. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 17:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but please, increase your activity this year. It's on the low side now. Meiræ 03:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 08:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 03:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya tried to be active every month as much as possible, but this activity isn't very good as other stewards' activities. Keep going a little more active. :) --Uncitoyen^talk 07:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Daryag (talk) 09:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good at anti-vandalism — NickK (talk) 13:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Experienced steward, especially valueble to the Hebrew-speaking wikimedia projects.--Naḥum (talk) 06:09, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 21:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It was 2020 so not a big deal, but generally per Camouflaged Mirage. --Base (talk) 15:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 15:11, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 11:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 11:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 15:48, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AGK ■ 22:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. --Dostojewskij (talk) 22:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 02:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:55, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 21:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ספסף (talk) 13:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cabayi (talk) 14:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --LuchoCR (talk) 19:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 20:32, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:11, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Melos edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages:
Personal info: Due to my work and the global situation, I was unable to serve the community as I wanted. To preserve my privacy I can't give further informations. Anyway I'm happy to serve the comunity as a steward for another year if the community will trust me as for other past years.

Comments about Melos edit

Neutral Initially I was about to vote remove due to general inactivity, but the statement give me pause, they might have some extenuating situations. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Aplasia (talk) 14:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Parma1983 (talk) 14:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Superpes15 (talk) 14:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep••Pierpao (talk) 14:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GC85 (talk) 14:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Civvì (talk) 16:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 17:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Samuele2002 (Talk!) 22:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per statement. Melos was generally inactive the whole year but I hope they will be able to restore activity. Meiræ 03:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - 2020 was an appalling year for many; it would be totally understandable to spend the bulk of it hiding under the covers until it went away... --Jack Frost (talk) 09:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Mirer (talk) 03:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why? — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 20:59, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Because of low activity. Melos was more active in the past, but this is a little lower for last 1-2 years. I hope you will be a little more active. --Uncitoyen^talk 07:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, hope 2021 will be a better year and will allow you to come back — NickK (talk) 13:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per Meiræ. -- CptViraj (talk) 13:26, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Equoreo (talk) 15:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 21:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 2020… --Base (talk) 15:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 11:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Burgundo (talk) 15:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --AGK ■ 22:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for inactivity. Steward is not an award, it's a working role. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 20:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for inactivity. * Pppery * _{it has begun} 14:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Dostojewskij (talk) 22:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:56, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - they were inactive in 2019 so don't believe 2021 would be much different. If they were open about why they were gone I would be a bit more understanding and depending on their answer I may of !voted Keep. –Davey2010^Talk 21:22, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for inactivity. ——SerialNumber54129 17:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 14:01, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for inactivity.--Hdiddan (talk) 18:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per this comment --Charitwo (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nadzik (talk) 08:11, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 11:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MusikAnimal edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en-N, es-3
Personal info: Hello, this is my first steward confirmation. When I applied for stewardship last year, I had big plans. Unfortunately, as was the case for many of us, the year didn't play out like I hoped. The pandemic and political climate severely inhibited my productivity, both on and off the wiki. Instead of working on the spambot problem, writing technical tools for stewards, and becoming a regular at SR, my activity has chiefly been in reaction to automation I use, rather than me seeking work to do. That said, I still like to think I've done some good work, and I am feeling much more confident about 2021.
I'd like to point for anyone reviewing Special:Log/MusikAnimal that given the nature of my steward work in 2020, many or perhaps most of my actions are not publicly visible. For those with the requisite rights, there's more to be seen in the suppression log.
As for things that could have gone better, I made a terrifying mistake on English Wikipedia where I accidentally imported revisions to a few very high-risk templates, but amazingly nothing actually broke. In response I have banned myself from using the Special:Import interface on English Wikipedia. The only other mishap to my knowledge was a simple newbie mistake that also didn't seem to do much harm, so overall I'm content with how I've adjusted to the toolset, though I think I still have plenty to learn.
Disclaimer: I am an engineer on WMF's Community Tech team. As noted in my statement last year, I have not experienced nor foresee any negative crossover with these roles given my focus as a steward is routine, uncontroversial counter-vandalism and maintenance.
I hope despite my less than ideal productivity (at least by my standards), I am still doing a good job and have had a positive impact. I look forward to accomplishing much more in the years to come. Thank you for the feedback. — MusikAnimal ^talk 03:54, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about MusikAnimal edit

Keep Kind user, competent steward. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Amanda (aka DQ) 15:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | enwiki} 15:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I don't see any problems. -- CptViraj (talk) 15:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep excellent engineer:)--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --ToprakM ^✉ 16:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 17:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rocking on. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Barkeep49 (talk) 18:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep KevinL (aka L235 · t) 18:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mz7 (talk) 18:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — xaosflux ^Talk 19:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ToBeFree (talk) 22:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Does good stuff. — pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 03:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No concerns. Meiræ 03:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 04:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 09:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 09:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Johannnes89 (talk) 11:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--باسم (talk) 17:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Michel Bakni (talk) 17:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ibrahim.ID ✪ 17:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very competent, kind, and trusted. Thank you! Waggie (talk) 20:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ivi104 (talk) 01:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Mirer (talk) 03:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why? — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 20:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MusikAnimal tried to be active every month as much as possible last year. No problem. --Uncitoyen^talk 07:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good work — NickK (talk) 13:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep cool wäre ein Klick :) --Itti (talk) 22:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 12:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A very helpful user although they seemed to be inactive for a few months.Ahmetlii (talk) 16:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --SDKmac (talk) 13:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nehaoua (talk) 23:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Em-mustapha ^{User | talk} 23:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 21:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --LexICon (talk) 01:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Maestro Ivanković 19:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 15:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 17:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep /Julle (talk) 20:13, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AVSmalnad77 ^talk 05:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 14:20, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 19:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AGK ■ 22:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:06, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 02:50, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:47, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 15:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Always ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 110% - Competent and trusted editor, Everyone makes mistakes and those mistakes are minor. Easiest support in the world. –Davey2010^Talk 21:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cabayi (talk) 14:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 13:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 20:33, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:54, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:12, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 11:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NahidSultan edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: BN-N, EN-3
Personal info: Hello Folks,
I’ve recently joined the Foundation as a full-time employee and my professional role sometimes requires working in the field of similar interest as Stewards generally do. To avoid any potential conflict of interest, I’ve decided to step down after the confirmation. As such, I’m not seeking confirmation this year. I’ll continue serving the community in my other volunteer and professional capacities. It's been an honor serving as a steward for the past few years. I’ve enjoyed every bit of it! Thank you.~ Nahid ^Talk 05:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about NahidSultan edit

Thanks for your work as a steward :) -- CptViraj (talk) 14:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very saddened to hear this, Nahid was one of the best we had, and language skills is a plus. They will be very missed. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for your past contributions and all the best in your future endeavours. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mehman 97 15:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep really sad to see this :( —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
KeepThanks for your work!--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your service over the years. Best of luck for the future journey! — ANKAN (talk) 16:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
TYFYS! ミラP@Miraclepine 16:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for your service. Miniapolis 17:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for all your work, and good luck on your future ones! —Thanks for the fish! ^{talk•contribs} 19:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service. --Stïnger （会話） 00:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Thanks for your service. --Rs chen 7754 01:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot for your service, Nahid, and best of luck in your new venture! Java Hurricane 03:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work. Meiræ 03:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In principle; best of luck in your endeavours. --Jack Frost (talk) 09:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thank you for your service! --mirinano (talk) 09:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your all works. --Uncitoyen^talk 14:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I wish you all the Best and Thanks for your service --Ibrahim.ID ✪ 18:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gereon K. (talk) 08:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service. --Geonuch (talk) 10:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work as a steward and I appreciate your decision — NickK (talk) 13:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. আশা করি ভবিষ্যতে আবার কোনদিন আপনাকে স্টুয়ার্ডরূপে দেখতে পাব। --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 15:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.--جار الله (talk) 02:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -wish for your new journey and thanks for the highly appreciable works for our community.--এম আবু সাঈদ (talk) 15:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 12:54, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is really sad to see you leaving. I hope that you return one day. :) R4356th (talk) 14:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service :) --Minorax (talk) 09:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, hope to see you back soon --Alaa :)..! 17:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! -Em-mustapha ^{User | talk} 23:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Taivo (talk) 09:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thank you, and if the situation changes see you at SE :P --Base (talk) 15:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good luck for your new role, and thanks for your service.--- Darwin ^Ahoy! 15:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hardworking part of the steward team as I observe. chansey ^message? 13:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Symbolic Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! --Achim (talk) 19:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --AGK ■ 22:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep। ইফতেখার নাইম (talk) 08:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pedram^Talk 08:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service.—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:59, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service. Take care and all the best. –Davey2010^Talk 21:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions, we hope to see you back soon :) Pedram^Talk 05:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service. Ahmad^talk 14:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work --DannyS712 (talk) 19:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your time here and good luck in your new role. --Charitwo (talk) 20:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:47, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:55, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Nadzik (talk) 08:12, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all you have done and good luck in your new job. RadiX ∞ 12:54, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

QuiteUnusual edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en, it-1, fr-2, es-1
Personal info: I've been a Wikimedian since October 2006 and have completed seven terms as a steward. I'm saying the same thing as last year: I believe I continue to have a record of attracting no controversy, both as a Steward and in my work on my main content projects (the English Wikipedia and Wikibooks). I've maintained a steady activity level throughout the year with the exception of a dip in late March / April caused by being responsible for business continuity planning in my day job - something that the pandemic made rather time consuming. I am active most days checking on the night's spamming attempts which is my main area of activity. I'm happy to continue and believe I have maintained an adequate level of activity and competence. I have no reason to believe anything will change during 2021 except I might get more time when we finally get some normality back into life.

Comments about QuiteUnusual edit

Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good interactions in enwikibooks, surely needed for spambots. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The work he does in my homewiki (en.wb) is good enough. Leaderboard (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question Hi, the discussion at Requests for comment/Site-wide administrator abuse and WP:PILLARS violations on the Croatian Wikipedia has been pending a close for the entirety of the last term, and has not had any Steward significantly discuss with the participants its status, despite a couple of requests and the more recent passing of the meta closure of rfc policy. Could you explain why a) you and b) the Stewards as a whole, failed to close (and, as applicable, execute, it)? As a connected point to the most likely answers (too complicated, insufficiently clear remedies, not in remit, etc) could you clarify both why it/they apply but also why you/the Stewards didn't make that known to every participant and ask for specific actions taken to make it possible for the Stewards to act on it, despite the insane timescale? Nosebagbear (talk) 15:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep pleasure working with him at en.wikibooks —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sotiale (talk) 15:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 17:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep nothing unusual at all about keeping him around. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Barkeep49 (talk) 18:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep KevinL (aka L235 · t) 18:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No concerns. Meiræ 03:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 09:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 09:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 03:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active steward. QuiteUnusual does a good job for fighting spambots. --Uncitoyen^talk 07:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 10:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity and useful work — NickK (talk) 13:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JackPotte (talk) 17:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I don't see any problems. -- CptViraj (talk) 13:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 19:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nehaoua (talk) 23:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 21:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 15:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:58, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 19:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AGK ■ 22:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:09, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 02:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:51, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 14:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 21:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 14:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 20:39, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:47, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:12, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RadiX edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, it-2, gl-1, sk-1, (sq, ms, hi)-0.5
Personal info: Hello, everyone. This is my sixth confirmation as a steward. Quite a long time has passed since I joined this team. As some may already know, I deal mostly with LTAs, cross-wiki abuse/vandalism/spam, but also process other requests like user rights management (both local and global), global renames, privacy related issues etc. I also do a lot of behind the scenes stuff, such as mailing list and IRC administration, and the management of the private checkuser wiki, which includes handling all these specific accesses as users get promoted or removed from their roles, but also other maintenance tasks permanently involved there. Due to the pandemic, I got completely busy in the middle of the year. I work with information technology at a state university; so, when things all went “on-line” in March, I found myself in a turmoil, and had to work around the clock to compensate it. Thankfully by the end of September they managed to hire more people, and things started going back to normal, as well as my activity on Meta. Despite of this, I kept handling some behind the scenes stuff and other private requests even on the lowest activity periods. 2020 was the harshest year for me ever, but I tried my best to stay committed on helping the Wikimedia community. Still, I am interested in continuing serving as a steward for one more year, now on my regular activity level, if confirmed of course. I think I am still useful to the corpus of stewards, and I hope I could get the opportunity to share my views and experience with the incoming stewards. Thank you!

Comments about RadiX edit

Keep, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues, must be kept :P Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep exquisite taste in coffee and regularly provides me with weather updates, which are vital to my understanding of the world. His sense of humor is a riot too, which I see as a plus. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question Hi, the discussion at Requests for comment/Site-wide administrator abuse and WP:PILLARS violations on the Croatian Wikipedia has been pending a close for the entirety of the last term, and has not had any Steward significantly discuss with the participants its status, despite a couple of requests and the more recent passing of the meta closure of rfc policy. Could you explain why a) you and b) the Stewards as a whole, failed to close (and, as applicable, execute, it)? As a connected point to the most likely answers (too complicated, insufficiently clear remedies, not in remit, etc) could you clarify both why it/they apply but also why you/the Stewards didn't make that known to every participant and ask for specific actions taken to make it possible for the Stewards to act on it, despite the insane timescale? Nosebagbear (talk) 15:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nosebagbear. Thanks for participating. As other stewards have already mentioned, given the rowdy situation involving hrwiki, it's unlikely that a steward alone would take any decision on it. There were some discussions over what was going on. However, in the present scenario, I also favor the view that the WMF T&S team is the most suitable instance do handle over it, since as stewards we should not act as a global arbcom. And as far as I know, they are working on the case. RadiX ∞ 20:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Radix: how would you say it is like a Global Arbcom - you'd only be assessing and executing a community consensus, as opposed to actually deciding an outcome? Nosebagbear (talk) 21:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't meant to compare the closure of a RfC to the commitments of an arbcom; it was just a unrelated example (and to hrwiki situation as a whole). Regards, RadiX ∞ 04:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think you are doing your part enough. Thank you all the time. --Sotiale (talk) 15:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for sure! —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 18:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Barkeep49 (talk) 18:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — xaosflux ^Talk 19:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (EditConfl.) --Kusurija (talk) 19:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep --Superpes15 (talk) 00:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No concerns. Meiræ 04:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 09:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 03:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns. --Uncitoyen^talk 08:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 10:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, keep up the good work — NickK (talk) 13:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)~[reply]
Keep Vanthorn (talk) 04:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 19:51, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nehaoua (talk) 23:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 01:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 21:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --LexICon (talk) 01:11, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 15:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --ZabeMath (talk) 11:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 14:55, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Dux Praxis (talk) 16:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 14:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 19:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lechatjaune (talk) 23:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AGK ■ 22:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nioger (talk) 06:09, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Jules ^Talk 11:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:10, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 02:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pedram^Talk 08:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Joalpe (talk) 10:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 14:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep An amazing steward. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 15:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 21:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cabayi (talk) 14:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 14:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 21:01, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ruslik0 edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: ru-N, en-5
Personal info: After ten years of being a steward I still feel that I am capable of continuing serving in same role. Speaking about the last year, I think that I was fairly active in almost all areas, which stewards are responsible for. In particular, I was active in the user local and global right management as well as in the processing global lock/unlock requests and in applying some global IP blocks. In addition to these areas, I handled checkuser requests from time to time and answered to local assistance requests on the SRM boards. Thank you.

Comments about Ruslik0 edit

Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 14:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active, trusted and no concerns from me. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | enwiki} 15:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mehman 97 15:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sotiale (talk) 15:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I don't see any problems. -- CptViraj (talk) 15:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Saroj Uprety (talk) 15:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 18:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ToBeFree (talk) 22:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep--Soul Train (talk) 00:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meiræ 05:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 09:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 09:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. —— Eric Liu_{（留言．百科用戶頁）} 09:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Mtarch11 (talk) 13:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ibrahim.ID ✪ 19:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 03:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Cool. --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 03:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active steward, especially in global locking. --Uncitoyen^talk 08:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 10:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nebydlogop (talk) 17:19, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Visible Light (talk) 20:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.--جار الله (talk) 02:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Iluvatar (talk) 00:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 13:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
KeepAhmetlii (talk) 16:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker ^(CA) 18:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why? — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 20:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 18:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- 94rain ^Talk 04:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Manchiu (talk) 13:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nehaoua (talk) 23:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 01:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 21:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --LexICon (talk) 01:11, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Zangala (talk) 10:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mykola7 (talk) 21:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 15:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Satirdan kahraman (talk) 22:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AVSmalnad77 ^talk 05:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 14:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 15:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 20:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Em-mustapha ^{User | talk} 20:49, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --AGK ■ 22:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:13, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 02:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:47, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 14:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 21:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cabayi (talk) 14:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for the same reason as the last year: tolerating breach of global rules and blaming the victim. — Robert Važan (talk) 05:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:30, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 21:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 11:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 13:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rxy edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: ja, en-1
Personal info: Hello, Wikimedians, This is my third confirmation as a Wikimedia steward. Thanks for confirmation in last year. The last year is hard to me and that is might be every peoples. yeah, COVID-19 situation. That situation caused me a frustrated to some real life and internet communication. For this, I took my stupid judgement with home wiki local community. I had dispute with some home wiki users for my home wiki sysop position and Wikimedia global Steward position. That dispute summary is below:
1. I had write a "resignation request" to the home wiki sysop as a one of a local community member as per Stewards policy, ToU and some related policies, guidelines in personally.
2. I opened RfC for mine.
3. Some part of a community member said "that is abuse of Steward position. That is (Steward) power harassment". e.g. w:ja:Special:Diff/77088277 (this comment is already withdwawn); Also some one said "resignation request should be passed community consensus before personally message".
4. I can not agree these comments without pointing which policy or guidelines based. Then I report that comments to T&S team due to I think these comments are violate of ToU's declined item "harassment" as not comply with Stewards policy#Corollary as they are still ordinary editors and any other position(s) they hold, are entitled to freely voice their opinions, state their view and be heard by the community, just as any other user may..
5. I disclosed to I had report to T&S team to a commented user.
6. A some one said above item is "Intimidation for local community".
7. Then I got 6 months blocking at the Japanese Wikipedia as per local community RfB.
8. Unfortunately, some user said "Should be withdrawn your T&S reports if you want to stay this community" (summarised).
9. I got some other clearly harassment at onwiki and/or off wikis. e.g. Requests for comment/Steward rights abuse and threats by User:Rxy on the Japanese Wikipedia
10. I got answer from WMF T&S team, And this case "Should be handled by local community and meta community." ; I agree with this.
Yeah, Disclose of a reporting to T&S may gives someone to scary, and I'm lack of that consideration. I'm regretting my actions. I hope still work together with Good-faith Wikimedians for Wikimedia Movement. if I confirmed from the Wikimedia community, I want to continue steward and/or MediaWiki development. Thanks,--rxy (talk) 14:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Rxy edit

Remove Abuse of steward position. Should be remove. He was blocked on the home wiki project, JAWP for six months. Not only does he put the blame on JAWP's community, but he does not reflect on what he has done, per his statement.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove We need a better explanation for the long-term block on jawiki, your homewiki, that takes ownership of the problem. What was the accusation (especially for non-ja speakers)? Why did you do what you did? What will you do better in the future? From reading your statement (and I admittedly didn't look at the links, which I am sure 90% of people won't either) it looks like at best you were not careful with how you were perceived as a steward, and at worst you really did intimidate people at your homewiki with your status. Also no explanation as to what the dispute was about. Rs chen 7754 14:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- As explained in the statement, I just did "resignation request of a sysop at the Japanese Wikipedia" as a Japanese Community member in personally. After that, the community member said "That is abuse of steward potision". Why Steward(s) can not describe own opinion in personally when local community tries override Stewards_policy#Corollary? Absolutely, I declare to I'm have no abusing "steward position" (steward abilities). Which rights have a local community overrides Global policy (except global policy allowed that)? I never know. Could you please submit an evidences? Please note to the Japanese Wikipedia Community does violate of CheckUser Global policy in the past case: w:ja:Wikipedia:チェックユーザー依頼/MaximusM4氏のRfA関連#Remarks from the ombudsman commission.--rxy (talk) 14:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - I don't understand. Why did you ask for a resignation? Because you don't like their opinion? Because they violated policy? There is a time and place for asking for a resignation, but if the response from the community isn't "thank you" but "how dare you" that is not a good sign. --Rs chen 7754 01:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - One of reason is when that bureaucrat ぱたごん does override current community consensus, customary and/or operation in w:ja:Wikipedia:権限申請/巻き戻し者/ソアラ/20200410. The case is candidate withdrawn own request, then w:ja:User:Q8j does closed as per candidate withdrawn, but w:ja:user:ぱたごん reverted closing procedure. then Q8j explained why they did that as per which consensus or current customary, but ぱたごん doe not apologize or an explain they what based on which policies, guidelines, current customary and/or operation, also have no revert own illegal action. That is not complied with community consensus and/or current customary or operation. I felt that movement is not suitable as a bureaucrat and/or a sysop.--rxy (talk) 10:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is not "Demanding resignation of user:ぱたごん". after that rxy tried to intimidate and silence comments for rxy from the Japanese community.(I'm not good at English.I'll explain in Japanese.)

問題はぱたごんへの辞任要求ではありません。問題は,その後,rxyさんへのコメントをT＆Sチームという日本語コミュニティにはよくわからないものを持ち出して黙らせようとしたことです。 --ぱたごん (talk) 12:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Twitter
#jawp ウィキペディア日本語版のコミュニティにはもはや WMF の基本理念や利用規約に従う気はないらしいので、利用規約違反の疑いがあるものには逐一 T&S チームに通報していきます。 — @rxyさん 15:58, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Since the Japanese Wikipedia community no longer seems to be willing to follow the basic principles and terms of service of the WMF, we will report every single suspected violation of the terms of service to the T&S team in order.

グローバルや他ウィキとは異なる（と感じられている）jawikiコミュニティーの性格・性質に辟易しており、もはやコミュニティー全体との敵対も辞さないという態度である可能性が少しあります。
— 青子守歌さん 13:17, 26 May (UTC)
It is somewhat possible that he is fed up with the nature and character of the jawiki community, which is (perceived to be) different from the global and other wikis, and is ready to antagonize the whole community.

Deliberately using greater understanding of the processes to further your own agenda is actively discouraged.
— Wikimedia power structure#Bureaucracy

Making personal battles out of Wikipedia discussions goes directly against our policies and goals.
— en:Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a battleground

--市井の人 (talk) 12:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Stewardship is not for towering over other editors with the power you preceive yourself as having. Stewards should be answerable to the community. Naleksuh (talk) 14:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, with regret. If rxy was a new candidate, and put themselves in SE, I probably would've opposed. No permissions on his home wiki, recent community-block, ... Also, the only reason why they would be able to put them into SE is that they have sysop at testwiki. I can't ignore this. Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per above. --IWI (talk) 14:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ I really respect Rxy as a person, but the recent issues gave me pause. I think these issues need to be addressed before I can support again. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per a number of the above --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Looking at multiple points of view with my limited abilities, that he was blocked from homewiki clearly needs to be considered in this confirmation, but I am not sure that this is an abuse of steward status or not. As far as I understand, I think the central point of the problem was what he recommended to an admin to resign and what he said he reported to T&S. My personal opinion is that he was at least free of abuse in global activities, and given that he resigned himself on homewiki when something went wrong, I can trust him until what happened on the homewiki is clearly revealed. I can change my opinion if it becomes obvious, but it's not yet clear to me. --Sotiale (talk) 15:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove ja:Wikipedia:管理者への立候補/rxy/20200416 As it stands, it's more than a flag of local disapproval. It is very unreasonable to think that the all-powerful full authority will be unconditionally extended to us. --市井の人 (talk) 15:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - I have to disagree with Sotiale's (provisional) reasoning. Even if their community actions didn't indicate a flaw with their global actions, it would indicate a lack of sufficiently strong local support and general status. I don't feel testwiki sysop status should qualify for SE, and so on that ground alone I'm reticent to support. Now a great explanation might show that ja-wiki was acting very oddly or exerting local pressure to demand unacceptable global actions, but unless that is demonstrated I oppose. Nosebagbear (talk) 15:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove User:rxy,s home wiki is Japanese wikipedia. Stewards should not like to use his/her Permissions on the home wikis. rxy tried to use his connections with Metawiki to turn the conflict in homewiki to his advantage. rxy used his/her connection to Meta-Wiki to threaten the homewiki. As a result, rxy has been blocked on his home wiki.--ぱたごん (talk) 15:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In condition that rxy should not act as a stward on jawp; in other words I still believe rxy could contribute much as a stward outside jawp. There was very unfortunate discommunication betweeen rxy and some of jawp people especially about the meaning of "report to T&S": some poeple were scared by the word "report to T&S" (which sounds very frightening indeed!), while rxy looked really suppressed or harassed by others. I, myself, thought rxy was too naive and out of oneself then (if you cannot keep yourself tough and shrewd, you should have wiki-break!). In RFB of rxy about 40% voted "long-term block", more than 30% "short-term or middle-term block" (probably for cooling down), and more than 20% "oppose", which resulted "six months".--miya (talk) 15:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I agree with the above. --ToprakM ^✉ 16:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove He / she performed an act of flickering steward authority and threatening conflicting users at JAWP. The person may deny it, but it is an act that cannot be helped even if it is interpreted as such.

This caused him / she to lose confidence as a local administrator at JAWP and was blocked by RfB in the community for 6 months, ~~but there was no comment such as an apology to the parties after the block period ended.~~ .. For this reason, I disagree with continuing to grant steward privileges to him / her.

As a Japanese speaker, I would like to avoid the absence of a Japanese speaker steward, but that is another matter.--Daraku K. (talk) 16:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)(I withdrew part of my remarks.--Daraku K. (talk) 09:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Could you please submit an evidences? if you have no evidences, that is personal attacking. I did not "flickering steward authority" in any cases. I guess such as "when you does not resignation, I'll remove your flags" is clearly intimidation. That example or similar case SHALL be removed stewardship. However, I didn't these or similar things.--rxy (talk) 16:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You made such a statement to a specific opponent in an administrator confidence vote (ja:special:diff/77233887). You later apologized for this at your own RfC, but no matter how tired you may be, such a statement can be interpreted as "flickering steward authority."

Sure, my wording above may have been wrong, but unfortunately it has given the impression that it can't be helped in the JAWP community. --Daraku K. (talk) 17:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

rxyさんはまた、ご自身のRfAにてこうもおっしゃいました。

「私は意識してそれをやっているつもりはないのですが、無意識に自分の利益のために他人をコマとして使う節があります。そして、利益が一致しなくなれば平気で切り捨てます。」

「無意識に自分の利益のために」ご自分がされたら、あるいは誰でもされたら嫌なことをしてしまう。要するに誰にも止められない宣言をされてしまっては十分脅かされました。--市井の人 (talk) 23:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove with regret. Even if there was no threat (doesn't mean I believe so), Rxy engaged in virtually no on-wiki communication (rollbacks, undos, changes to own js page, and global (b)locks (numerous or not) don't count) from 23 May 2020 until this page was created yesterday (more than seven months!), as shown here (takes minutes to load). The steward tool should be entrusted only to those willing to communicate. ミラP@Miraclepine 16:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove This is just disgusting... Good riddance. 1989 (talk) 17:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- That's entirely unnecessary. Reminder that there's a human behind the username. Legoktm (talk) 06:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Let me state that it is very saddening for me to seen this, as well as the initial concerns 6 months ago. Rxy is one of the most hardworking stewards we had in term of counter vandalism and our only native Japanese steward, and had extensive experience in dealing with some of the most dangerous LTAs we had, such as ISECHIKA (if you know this LTA well you will know why they are dangerous). We simply do not have another steward with this set of proficiency, yes I know Sakretsu and Sotiale can fill in the gaps but they are busy in their own rights. All in all, I didn't see him misusing his stewards tool, and am confident that he still can be a responsible steward at the global level. However, the local concerns are way too much for me to take, and someone being removed as a local sysop and was blocked on homewiki doesn't augurs well with the trust we would like to see in a steward. Clearly the issues can be resolved in a better manner and as per my criterion, stewards ought to be the link between communities and WMF and etc. Now the trust had been broken in jawp and them, I don't think they can meet this requirement. With exterme regret and thanks for all the work you had done, Remove. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Lack of local support is a serious concern. Miniapolis 18:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove The dispute summary from rxy is a proof that they are not suitable for confirmation as steward at this stage. I try to provide my version of the summary at User:ネイ/Timeline of the 2020 case if anyone would like to know more details before commenting. ネイ (talk) 18:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for explaining the incident in detail. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 06:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you. On the surface, it concerns me that a steward is allegedly working that closely with T&S to report users for what appears to be disputes and not something like child protection, legal threats, etc. From what you say, it portrays a view that rxy thinks that jawiki is the next hrwiki. @Rxy: How would you reply to this timeline? If this timeline is indeed correct, I believe that the intimidating comments from April 25 are an abuse of the steward position and must be treated accordingly. --Rs chen 7754 07:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Almost correct, but lack of important context. I added and modified in User:Rxy/User:ネイ/Timeline of the 2020 case (diff). A voter concerns for abusing a sysop permissions , then that stewardship relation is I said that in sarcasm. I'm not expect to said that as intimidation. Also reporting to T&S team for incidents is not restricted to stewards. everyone can do that.--rxy (talk) 10:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for provide details of English timeline. My modification version is User:Rxy/User:ネイ/Timeline of the 2020 case.--rxy (talk) 10:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, and updated my version accordingly to provide more details. ネイ (talk) 12:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Lack of local support among others. --Kusurija (talk) 18:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove — xaosflux ^Talk 19:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral ｒｘｙさんを信頼していますが、コミュ二ティのコメントによると。。。中立です。I trust rxy but according to the community's comments, I'm neutral. --Stïnger （会話） 20:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Remove --Count Count (talk) 21:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove ToBeFree (talk) 22:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I'm saddened to see the above and I can't support this user in any trusted position. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 00:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -- dwf² ✉ 01:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - He was one of those who was once notified to T & S in April 2020 due to disagreement and was threatened with editorial activities even though he did not troll. If this case was done by myself, there was still a part where the conflict between the people was done.

However, less than a few months after that, in May 2020, Marine-Blue was notified to T & S of a similar event.

I apologized to me for the time being, but when I saw the exchange with Marine-Blue, I thought that it was just a form. It made me wonder if the report to T & S was so light.

It's been a long time, but from the above, I can only think that I'm trying to use Steward's authority for my own maintenance, not for the right thing. I do not endorse Rxy as an administrator, let alone a steward.--ミラー・ハイト (talk) 03:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)typo.--ミラー・ハイト (talk) 05:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove sadly. Java Hurricane 03:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC) Reconsidering, Keep weakly. The block on jawiki is extremely serious, but the work done against LTAs like ISECHIKA and other stewardry also needs consideration. No abuse of steward rights has been shown to have occurred, and that brings my concerns down a bit regarding Rxy's use of the rights. Rxy has been a very good steward, the block aside, and I'm willing to give Rxy another chance. Java Hurricane 03:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. Home wiki block is a major red flag. — pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 03:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Sotiale. Although the outcome is obvious at this point. Meiræ 05:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The block in homewiki is certainly not a good point. However, I don't think this is a reason for removal. I wish rxy a long and successful career as a steward. KantoDetectiveBot (talk) 05:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Abusing multiple accounts or sockpuppetry: User:129femtoseconds(known as User:Syun respect for music) Long-term abuse user's commment.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 08:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - uh? what do you have of rights to strike a comment? You are not a member of ElectCom of StewElc 2021. Are you didn't learn anything in the past case of w:ja:利用者‐会話:Infinite0694#信任投票における判定のような行為などについて (PermaLink)? I guess strike should be done by ElcCom.--rxy (talk) 10:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - Yikes, this isn't the comment I expected to see from the subject of this confirmation. --Rs chen 7754 02:20, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I'm not really sure what to make of the controversy, I initially thought maybe they should have stood for full election again to see if they still had the community's trust, but they're not eligible to do so. So remove, but thank you for all of your past work. Legoktm (talk) 06:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral In global, I think there is no isse with rxy's activities as a 2020 steward. In particular, specify jobs that other stewards cannot do, such as automatic locking of Long-term abuse. Stewards do not exercise their authority on their home wiki. In other words, his activity as a steward should be evaluated outside of the home wiki. However, given the "trust" from the community, I can't say "keep". --mirinano (talk) 10:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- As you all know, LTA:ISECHIKA is a WMF banned user. steward’s lock is appropriate for this. Which steward other than Rxy can lock ISECHIKA quickly? I don't know a steward who can lock LTA which uses complicated Japanese.--mirinano (talk) 13:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - See User talk:Mirinano#おたずねがあります. --市井の人 (talk) 03:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sotialeさんのご意見が最も状況を的確に捉えていらっしゃるものと考えます。これまでのrxyさんの対荒らし対処の実績も考慮すると、引き続きスチュワードを務めていただくのが好ましいと考えます。Infinite0694さんのおっしゃるようなスチュワードの地位を濫用した事実はないものと思料します。--Ohgi (talk) 10:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC) 以下のご指摘に基づき、最初の1文を最後に移動。--Ohgi (talk) 05:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Ohgiさん（別名: 篠田陽司さん）は、rxyさんが始められたwikiサイトの二人きりの最上位スタッフ･共同運営者、いわゆるお仲間ですよね。--市井の人 (talk) 10:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  Translation - Ohgi's vote: I do not think what Infinite0694 said about Rxy misusing his steward position is correct. I consider Sotiale's interpretation of the situation to be the most accurate. After considering Rxy's track record of anti-vandalism efforts, I think it is desirable for Rxy to continue serving as a steward.
  
  市井の人's comment: Ohgi and Rxy are operators of the duo highest ranking wiki site which Rxy started. In other words, they are partners. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 12:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- 問題なのはT&Sへの通報ではなく、それをわざわざ人前で告知することです。この点についてrxyさんは「本件においてコミュニティの皆様、およびミラー・ハイトさんさんに、多大なるご迷惑と恐怖心、不信感、精神的圧力、時間的損失、不快感を与えてしまったこと、深くお詫び申し上げます。」との理解を示されています。また、rxyさんはミラー・ハイトさんに対し「現時点で私はスチュワード権限をもっており、」などを誇示した事実がありました。それでも「（rxyさんが）スチュワードの地位を濫用した事実はない」と考える利用者がおられるのですね。その是非はここでの結果として現れるのではないでしょうか。--市井の人 (talk) 00:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- なお、OhgiさんはスチュワードのSotialeさんを引き合いに出していますが、Sotialeさんのご見解は「（rxyさんが）スチュワードの地位を濫用した事実はない」ではなく「見つけられなかった」以上でも以下でもないはずです。上記で示した差分をご確認いただき、再評価を望みます。--市井の人 (talk) 00:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - 当方も今一度確認しましたが、Sotiale氏の原文を要約すれば「当人（立候補者）がホームウィキ（=日本語版Wikipedia,以下JAWP）でブロックされた事は明確に考慮が必要ながら、これがスチュワードステータスの濫用かは確認出来ません（=見つけられません）でした。少なくともグローバル活動における濫用は確認出来なかった。JAWPにおける行為が明確になるまで立候補者を信頼出来るが、JAWPでの行為が明確であれば票の変更の可能性がある。」と言う内容。要は「グローバルでは問題は起こってないが、JAWPにおいて問題が起こっている。しかしその問題行為（T&Sチームの件）は明確には確認出来なかった」と言う事で、末尾に「but it's not yet clear to me.(=しかし当方では（JAWPでの行為が）ハッキリしていない）.」とあります。しかし、Ohgi氏の発言は、市井の人さんの仰る通りSotiale氏の発言を引用し、意図的ではないにしろミスリードによりSotiale氏が「地位を濫用した事実はない（事を確認した）」事を追認した」と言う体になってしまいます。Sotiale氏は「No fact of abuse status（=地位濫用の事実なし）」と言った濫用の事実が無かった事を断定する類の事は一言も仰っていません。よってOhgi氏の発言は非常に不適切と存じますし、善意に取って参考での引用の意図ならば「ブロックされた事実はあるが明確に濫用は見つけられなかった旨ではあるが～」なり付け加えるべきです。--Tece Onir (talk) 10:16, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - 「いわゆるお仲間ですよね。」は、特にここの投票権とかかわるものではないので、個人攻撃（人身攻撃論法）だと思いました。その他の点については、私の申し上げていないことを論じておられますが、ご意見はわかりました。--Ohgi (talk) 12:34, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      - 「特にここの投票権とかかわるものではない」＝「個人攻撃（人身攻撃論法）」というのがよくわかりません。「お仲間」を「ステークホルダー (stakeholder)」と言い換えても無根拠ではなく事実ではありませんか。--市井の人 (talk) 12:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        本来の投票に係る事ではないので苦言としてこれだけに留めておきます。Ohgi氏においては「私の申し上げていないことを論じておられますが」と仰っておりますが、ニュアンス的に意図しなくとも、特段引用相手が英語である事を用いて、意味合いが違う事をあたかも事実のように引用している時点で実際そう取られてもおかしくない行為（少なくとも私にはそう感じられますし、善意に取っても当方指摘のように説明不足でしょう）であると感じられます。それを「ご意見は解かった」で淡白に済ませるのは、違う意図で引用されたSotiale氏に対しても、また投票するに当たって参考になさる方に対しても極めて礼を失する行為かと存じます（撤回修正するなりした方が宜しいかと思いますが）。以上場を汚すようですが失礼しました。--Tece Onir (talk) 18:41, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        Ohgiさんには前段に「Infinite0694さんの反対理由は事実誤認」というご自分の主観があります。これは記事を書く上で出典が示されていないのを独自研究とするのと似ています。そうなりますと善意に取ればInfinite0694さんおよび同様の反対理由がある利用者に「どのあたりがそうなの？」と聞くことが出来るでしょう（詳細にまで話を蒸返すのを避けていたのならお互い様です）。しかし中段でそこを省いてSotialeさんの賛成理由に担保させてしまいました。意図としては「自分の考えに最も近い」のがあったのはわかりますが（であれば言葉足らず）、傍から見たら齟齬がある以上こういうのは文脈として付会と言います。一方で後段に来るOhgiさんの賛成理由ではrxyさんのこれまでの実績というSotialeさんの賛成理由とは直接の関係はない点を述べているに過ぎません。--市井の人 (talk) 20:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        
        誤解を招きやすいことはわかりましたので、文の順番を入れ替えます。当然ながら、私の意見の内容とSotialeの意見の内容は異なるものですし、Sotialeがスチュワードかどうかもこの場ではあまり関係ありません。私の意見そのものや意見を述べることが可能かどうかとは無関係な私の個人的状況を指摘することによって、私の意見の妥当性に疑念を呈する論理的な誤りを人格攻撃論法といいます。ステークホルダーとのご指摘については、ウィキメディアの利用者全てがある意味ステークホルダーなのですが、私はrxyのウィキメディアのウェブサイトにおける振る舞いやスチュワード権限の有無について特別な利害関係はないです。--Ohgi (talk) 05:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        なぜステークホルダーなのかと言いますと、おっしゃるとおり広義のニュアンスがあると思ったからです。これには理由がありましてOhgiさんは以前ローカルでja:Wikipedia:削除依頼/エンペディア180813にコメントを残された際に、ja:WP:AUTOの立場をお認めになりました。このガイドラインはen:WP:AUTOBIOではほぼ本人を対象としているのに対し、jaでは拡大してまさにステークホルダーを対象としています（こういったことを統括するスチュワードはさぞかし苦労するのだろうと思いますが）。で、私は事実に着目しただけでそれ以上は何も言っていません。私がOhgiさんのコメントの妥当性について結論を出そうとしているのは、それとは視点が異なります（ましてや差分等を示して説明しています）から詭弁でないことだけは確かです。また、人身攻撃≒対人論証とするにもたとえば「OhgiさんはWikipedia日本語版の管理者です」ということをここで自己紹介されても参考になるのと同じように、第三者がそれを行ったまでで、そこをどのように参考にするかは読んだ人にもよりますから、絶対的な言ってもいないことを言ったような受け止め方は理解できませんね。--市井の人 (talk) 07:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No clue about the jawiki dispute yet, but I would like to Thank you very much! for handling LTAs and other CVN stuff these years. --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 10:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Auto-GL and auto-blocking aren't actions that only Rxy can do. --Semi-Brace (talk) 11:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- see also: Blocks by Rxy. Most of blocks are for ISECHIKA. It's easier than others (note: in my opinion) as its naming has consistency which noted its LTA page. --Semi-Brace (talk) 07:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Johannnes89 (talk) 11:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove – Ammarpad (talk) 14:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove * Pppery * _{it has begun} 15:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Rxy is one of most active stewards. Rxy is especially helpful in combat with LTAs on his languages. I agree to Sotiale, I also agree with the positive parts of Camouflaged Mirage's comments. I didn't understand very well the situation in local community. I tried to translate the case that caused the block with Google Translate, but I think it translated a little bad. My opinion like this for now. --Uncitoyen^talk 15:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Mirer (talk) 03:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Geonuch (talk) 10:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, being blocked for 6 months on a home wiki is a red flag. Yes, he is very helpful on LTAs but this is a serious problem — NickK (talk) 13:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, per comments above. --Daniuu (talk) 17:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, same as above. Poor attitude for a stewards. --LaMagiaaa (talk) 05:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, As mentioned above, he abused Stewards rights, including threatening other users by "reporting to the T & S team." As a result, it was removed from JAWP Sysop and blocked for 6 months. So I don't think he can be trusted as a stewards.--Tece Onir (talk) 02:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove　一般利用者を萎縮させ恐怖を与える存在 / Steward who atrophy and scare users--フリー百科事典利用者 (talk) 06:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove because of T&S-related threats to users. MBH (talk) 12:09, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I’m a sysop on JAWP. I do appreciate Rxy’s contributions in counter vandalism. In recent 24 hours, JAWP met 87 suspected ja:LTA:ISECHIKA’s new accounts. 14 of them have their home project other than JAWP. 3 of them created abusive global user pages on meta. LTA:ISECHIKA is beyond control of local projects. We need meta’s help; and Rxy serves it. Japanese projects owe Rxy much. Steward is neither the title of noble nor the rank of users. It is a nice cat while it catches mice.--Kurihaya (talk) 15:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Therefore I propose that Rxy may publish the code that is used to fight against ISECHIKA (the sensitive part may be published to checkuserwiki so that other stewards and jawiki CUs may know). On the other hand most locked ISECHIKA socks have no edits.--GZWDer (talk) 16:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Doesn't make sense, why did you think the code should be open? Patterns are much meaningful. Also, the jawp community gave Rxy red flag in his RfB; the tasks for those LTAs will be done other stewards like current jawp admins do. We do not have to depend him action.--Semi-Brace (talk) 17:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Toad62 (talk) 16:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Minorax (talk) 09:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Because made a statement that could be read as an abuse of authority, "reporting to the T & S team.", in response to a small complaint, and because he was blocked from posting for 6 months on his home wiki.--Koyomiya(コヨミヤ) (talk) 09:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral This is just very sad to see, overall. Need to read into this more, it isn't clear how all this started. Leaderboard (talk) 21:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Despite everything I still have a lot of faith in him as a steward --Wim b 21:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 22:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I always considered the block on his homewiki to be worrying and tried to understand it (at the time but also now in this confirmation process). In my view, and being succinct, informing the submission of a complaint to the Trust and Safety team about an issue, regardless of the user's rights, cannot be considered an "abuse of authority" - I also don't find it "intimidating" (although that would depend on how it was done and I'm not a Japanese speaker). In the real life this is called "regular exercise of law". I also don't see it as an abuse to ask someone to resign - it would have been abusive if he himself removed the tools of someone from the jawiki who had not resigned. Besides that, as Uncitoyen said, Rxy is one of the most active stewards and I think that his removal will be a loss to the global community. And, also, the opposition of several members of the jawiki - many without any argument, sadly - cannot be considered a valid reason in itself since "strong local support" is not an approval / confirmation requirement and this process is guided by consensus. Érico (talk) 02:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Before I explain my supporting rationale, I would like to state that I have struck my neutral vote above. I have followed this discussion for a few days, and I understand where the jawiki users are coming from. What we need to consider here is a huge issue as it concerns Japanese Wikipedia and the entire Wikimedia community. It seems that many jawiki users perceived Rxy's comments here as intimidation (恫喝) of the community and abuse (濫用) of his steward status. He has since apologised for that comment. However, what remains as a fact is that many jawiki users were offended by that comment. That was why Rxy's adminship on jawiki was removed and he was blocked for 6 months. I agree with the users above that the block is indeed serious, and it cannot be overlooked. But I feel that there must be a misunderstanding between Rxy and the jawiki community. Having no trust from the local community is a big issue and hence we are discussing if we should keep Rxy as a steward. If we were to keep him as a steward, the misunderstanding between Rxy and the jawiki community may become deeper. One feasible solution which Miya mentioned, is that Rxy should not act as a steward in jawiki. But I'm not sure if that is possible, as stewardship is global. I'm sure many users agree with me that Rxy has contributed extensively as a steward outside jawiki. Without Rxy's contributions, the ISECHIKA sock situation might become out of control. I agree with Camouflaged Mirage on this part. Removal of Rxy's stewardship would be a huge loss on the Wikimedia community as only Rxy has the most experience in this area. I acknowledge Rxy's hard work and I would like to commend him for that. In any event Rxy's stewardship is removed, we need another Japanese user to fill up this important gap. I still trust Rxy as a steward, that is why I'm voting keep here. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 04:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- It's "Belling the Cat" - stewards of Asian languages, not just ja, have been sought after in Chinese, for example. I understand. Stewards/Elections_2020/Questions#Bletilla
- I also feel like I'm hearing about politics and ideology, like "Deterrence theory" roughly in addition to roles and alternatives. --市井の人 (talk) 05:42, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 09:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep From what I have seen, the tension between rxy and the jawiki community seems to have arisen from misunderstanding of what "[reporting] to T&S" implies. While distrust from their local community is not favourable for rxy, their efforts against LTAs should be appreciated. H78c67c (talk) 18:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --伊佐坂安物 (talk) 00:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 結果はおそらく見えていますが・・・
2020年の件はスチュワードとしての問題ではなく、一利用者としての問題と私は考えます。もちろん一利用者として問題を起こした人間を信頼できないというのはもっともな考え方とは思いますが、私はローカルで問題が起こればローカルでブロックすることができる以上、ISECHIKAの自動ロックなどRxyさんがスチュワード権限を持つメリットはデメリットを上回ると判断しました。--Q8j (talk/CA) 01:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Translation: The outcome can probably be seen now... but I don't think the problem of 2020's incident lies with Rxy's stewardship status. It lies with Rxy as an individual user. There are certainly people who consider users who cause problems untrustworthy. However, based on my judgement, there are more merits than demerits if Rxy maintains his stewardship status to make automatic locks on ISECHIKA's socks, as he can be blocked locally when problems arise. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 09:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- 既に上で『rxyさんはミラー・ハイトさんに対し「現時点で私はスチュワード権限をもっており、」などを誇示した事実がありました。』と提示しておりますが、これを「一利用者としての問題」とするには無理があります。一般的にも公衆の面前における自分の地位・肩書き、所属等を明示した上での発言は、プライベートやオフレコでは済まされないでしょう。--市井の人 (talk) 07:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - 例えば上でKurihayaさんが「I’m a sysop on JAWP.」とおっしゃってますが、日本語版管理者としてコメントしたわけではなく一利用者としてのものでしょうし、例えば「私は〜〜で管理者、CUで〜」といってグローバル権限に立候補する人も、別に管理者として立候補するわけではないでしょう。「一利用者としての問題」とはそういう意味で使ったつもりですが、誤解を招いたなら申し訳ないです。--Q8j (talk/CA) 07:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - ここでの投票・コメントや全般的な立候補は権限を有するかとは関係なくできることです。ですから「〜であるから」などに続かない限り自己紹介に過ぎません。ところがrxyさんの場合、話の切り出しで「現時点で私はスチュワード権限をもっており、」としただけでなく、それに続けてスチュワード権限を有することによってできること（ご本人はそのつもりはないとしてはいますが）をひけらかしているではありませんか。よってQ8jさんの例えによる「一利用者としての問題」は誤った一般化です。--市井の人 (talk) 08:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - 付け加えますと、「スチュワード権限を有することによってできること」とは具体的には投稿ブロックとしていますが、この発言は2020年4月25日 (UTC) のものです。rxyさんは2020年4月16日 (UTC) の時点でローカル管理者の権限を失っていますから、「スチュワード権限を有することによってできること」に違いありません。--市井の人 (talk) 08:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - ポイントとしてQ8jさんがおっしゃった「ローカルで問題が起こればローカルでブロックすることができる以上、」というのも、そうはできなくなった元管理者がローカルコミュニティに対し「（まだ）スチュワード権限を有することによってできること」として投稿ブロックをちらつかせたわけです。これには恐怖で震えて当然です。--市井の人 (talk) 09:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Worth talking with (talk) 02:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC) LTA / locked account. RadiX ∞ 03:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment @Election Committee(@Mardetanha, Martin Urbanec, RadiX, -revi, and Tks4Fish: same sock's vote again.) --Infinite0694 (Talk) 02:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  Striked. Thanks. RadiX ∞ 03:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep My comment is as follows:

As you all knows, I found the past comments at: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:コメント依頼/rxy_20200416

◇ただ、ウィキペディアンとして別のウィキペディアンに「意見」を伝えるのは自由です。会話ページで2人で話し合って合意できなければコメント依頼へ進むのが筋。今回は即座に「辞めます」と返事されたけど、自身に非が無いという確信があり権限を持ち続ける意欲があれば「辞任する気はない」と返事すれば済む話でした。◇「コメント依頼で意見を聞いてから解任に進む」という過酷なプロセスに進む前に個人的に辞任勧告する、というのは、むしろ親切なステップともいえます。解任投票にかけられ心折れてウィキペディアを去った人たちを忘れません。--miya（会話） 2020年4月25日 (土) 07:01 (UTC)

(above translation) However, as a Wikipedian, you are free to pass on "opinion" to other Wikipedians. If the two can't reach an agreement after discussing it on the conversation page, it is reasonable to ask for comments. This time, I received an immediate reply of "I quit.", but if you are confident that you are not guilty and have the will to retain authority, it would be enough to reply "have no intention of resigning". It is rather a kind step to personally recommend resignation before proceeding with the harsh process of "hear someone's opinion in a request for comment before dismissing him". I will not forget those who were forced to leave Wikipedia in the dismissal vote.

Special:Diff/77277809 追加文 3つ目「これは、個人的に、」以降のとおり考えております故、管理者としてやめても、一利用者としては居続けてほしかったからです。管理者は補充できます。しかし「嫌気がさして去ってしまう・去ってしまった利用者」は最小限度に留める必要があると私は考えています。--rxy（会話） 2020年4月29日 (水) 01:44 (UTC)

(above translation) I wanted him to stay as a user even if he quit as a manager. We can replenish administrators, but I think we need to keep "Annoying users who leave" to a minimum.

You can find more detailed discussions afterwards at: Wikipedia:投稿ブロック依頼/rxy https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:投稿ブロック依頼/rxy

Use machine translation for English at https://miraitranslate.com/trial if necessary.

From the above mentioned, I will support the comment of rxy. What's more, ""In the real life this is called "regular exercise of law". I also don't see it as an abuse to ask someone to resign"" as Érico pointed out at 02:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC). --Green (talk) 14:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- Please look at it Special:Diff/21079879

The problem is not "Demanding resignation of user:ぱたごん". after that rxy tried to intimidate and silence comments for rxy from the Japanese community.(I'm not good at English.I'll explain in Japanese.)
問題はぱたごんへの辞任要求ではありません。問題は,その後,rxyさんへのコメントをT＆Sチームという日本語コミュニティにはよくわからないものを持ち出して黙らせようとしたことです。
— User:ぱたごん

- --市井の人 (talk) 14:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I agree with the arguments that say that if Rxy were to run for an election now they would probably not be elected because they are not an admin on content wiki anymore and because the block is a big red flag. That is why my vote is "weak". This is a confirmation vote though, and we already know what kind of steward Rxy is. I know some rudimentary Japanese (~N4 JLTP wise), but I am certain that it will be very challenging for me to do the kind of work Rxy does, most notably dealing with ISECHIKA socks. I am pretty sure it would be for others too. Rxy is also helpful with some technical stuff. What I also rember is that when Rxy makes a mistake they take it very seriously. When it comes to the situation at hand, what it looks to me like is that it is mostly a local conflict, where steward rights were not involved and the only thing that was potentially involved was some degree of authority Rxy holds as a steward. In the latter case yes, that would be something I would expect a steward to be more clear about, but that is not a mistake I would want a steward to lose rights over (unless it happens regularly). I am also happy with the fact that Rxy communicated the situation to other stewards on Stewardwiki and on mailing list right away while indicating that it can be biased since it is them who wrote it. I see it as another indication that they are responsible person, and for this reason I can trust them to use their steward permissions globally while avoiding direct interaction with Japanese Wikipedia outside the indirect one of them locking the LTAs originating from jawiki. I shold also add that people should not be afraid to contact Trust and Safety team when they feel like there is a reason to do so. I have my trust in the team's judgement and if there is no valid reason for the team to perform any action they won't. --Base (talk) 15:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not a safe assumption. There is no open community scrutiny of those proceedings, and we've already seen cases where T&S has taken questionable actions. But this is besides the point. T&S isn't up for voting here; someone who uses T&S as a threat/weapon is, and that behavior is not appropriate no matter what T&S does or doesn't do. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 21:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --20041027 tatsu (talk) 06:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --ZabeMath (talk) 11:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Araisyohei (talk) 12:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 23:04, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment He said "reported you to the T&S team" to some people on purpose. It can be taken as a action that preventing people from participating discussions. he said:
- April 26: “You are one of the targets for report. The result could be global blocking in worst case, but it’ll a warning if worst in this case.” (https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=77233887&diffmode=source) to ja:User:ミラー・ハイト
- April 26: “I will not withdraw the report. I’m still feeling that I’ve been harassed.” and “<sysop is meaningless because>I have upward compatible permission<steward>.”

(https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:%E3%82%B3%E3%83%A1%E3%83%B3%E3%83%88%E4%BE%9D%E9%A0%BC/rxy_20200416&diff=77246175&oldid=77245964&diffmode=source)

- (May 24: submitted RFB for Rxy)
- May 24: "It seems the jawp community won't follow WMF policies or base principle, so I'll report things that have suspect violations to T&S," in his twitter
- According to Rxy, he had reported them because he felt harassed and some person have suspect violation of principle. But it effected badly because that made person scare. --Semi-Brace (talk) 06:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Karasunoko (talk) 17:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Klaas `Z4␟` V: 15:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Per ja incident. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 04:08, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Don-kun (talk) 19:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove due to the jawiki incident. AGK ■ 22:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm surprised that many people agree to remove rxy's Steward right. Rxy has contributed to deal with vandalism such as LTA:ISECHIKA. --ExpressGifu (talk) 05:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Excellent work! I have come to make a report. I agree to remove rxy's right　because rxy is using his　underling, えのきだたもつ to block innocent people. I was also blocked by えのきだたもつ for trying to break the block, but it was mistake. In the end, it became obvious that I am innocent. My innocence has been proven, but this is not acceptable behavior like this. Please visit this web site jp:利用者‐会話:えのきだたもつ#ブロック追認依頼を出すことをおすすめします for your reference. Many people have pointed out inappropriate behavior by えのきだたもつ on this web page. Best regards,--Maskprohibitionff (talk) 11:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)--Maskprohibitionff (talk) 11:14, 18 February 2021 (UTC)--Maskprohibitionff (talk) 09:11, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. Clearly nothing close to community consensus that this editor should retain the Steward role. The chilling-effect problems of reporting people to T&S and using that as a weapon against them in disputes is reason by itself for sufficient doubt. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 21:09, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker ^(CA) 09:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. Local incident is a red flag and I see some mistakes, but I also know Rxy is highly active as a Steward on an area occupied by a few. Something tells me that it could be dealt with differently, but I am not sure if proposing anything at this moment is reasonable.—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 14:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The homewiki concerns make me lean remove, but overall Rxy is a somewhat competent steward. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 15:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Martin puts the low bar well. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:29, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--Coffins (talk) 21:29, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Disgusting behaviour. Good riddance. –Davey2010^Talk 21:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove: Bizarre behavior to get massively blocked on one's home wiki for trust issues and then have the chutzpah to come here for reconfirmation as one of the most trusted positions available. ——SerialNumber54129 18:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC). ——SerialNumber54129 18:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove weakly. S/he has been a good steward, without any large problem until today, and I can expect s/he will be in next year. However, since nobody can ensure it, s/he could face the case to explain what his/her actions and/or statements are "correct" on the confused (or wrong) case. The jawiki's case showed how s/he would do in such a situation.
（In Japanese/日本語で）彼（女）はこれまで良きスチュワードであり（特に大きな問題がなかったという意味で）、次の年もそうであり続けるとは思います。しかし、それを保証することは誰もできないので、複雑な（あるいは間違った）対応をした時に、その行動や主張の正しさを説明する機会もあるかもしれません。そんな時に彼（女）はどのように対応するのかは、今回のjawikiでの出来事を見れば分かるでしょう。 --aokomoriuta (talk) 13:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:27, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --DannyS712 (talk) 19:30, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Charitwo (talk) 21:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nadzik (talk) 08:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sakretsu edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: it, en-3, ja-2
Personal info: I'm honored to be writing here for the first time. If memory serves me right, I have never had the opportunity to thank the community adequately for the trust placed in me last year. It may not be apparent, but so far I have done my best to act in the capacity of steward despite the hard times that we are living in. Whether it be on Meta, IRC, or by email, I always look for requests or tasks that I can help with. And I plan on doing the same next year, should this confirmation be successful. Thank you for the feedback--Sakretsu (炸裂) 18:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Sakretsu edit

Keep Great first year! Thanks for your work! --Superpes15 (talk) 14:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep You are such a reliable person! Thanks for your work:D--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I will say I regretted my statements during your confirmation last year, and my neutral votes, my questions. One of the best stewards we had, decisive in action and every action seems very valid and well thought of. Thank you. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Aplasia (talk) 14:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Parma1983 (talk) 14:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep••Pierpao (talk) 14:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GC85 (talk) 14:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question Hi, the discussion at Requests for comment/Site-wide administrator abuse and WP:PILLARS violations on the Croatian Wikipedia has been pending a close for the entirety of the last term, and has not had any Steward significantly discuss with the participants its status, despite a couple of requests and the more recent passing of the meta closure of rfc policy. Could you explain why a) you and b) the Stewards as a whole, failed to close (and, as applicable, execute, it)? As a connected point to the most likely answers (too complicated, insufficiently clear remedies, not in remit, etc) could you clarify both why it/they apply but also why you/the Stewards didn't make that known to every participant and ask for specific actions taken to make it possible for the Stewards to act on it, despite the insane timescale? Nosebagbear (talk) 15:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think the boldness of Sakretsu will help the team. --Sotiale (talk) 15:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the people who got him to run last year knew what they were talking about :p TonyBallioni (talk) 15:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 18:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mz7 (talk) 18:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 22:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep helpful! —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 00:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No concerns. Meiræ 05:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Civvì (talk) 08:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Definitely. --Jack Frost (talk) 09:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 09:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --НУРшЯGIO^{(beware of the moose)} 11:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very honest and forthcoming. --Ivi104 (talk) 00:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 03:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the most active stewards last year. Good job like other elected new stewards last year. --Uncitoyen^talk 08:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 10:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, active and helpful — NickK (talk) 13:30, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- 94rain ^Talk 04:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Equoreo (talk) 16:09, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nehaoua (talk) 23:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 01:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --.snoopy. ✉ 13:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 21:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Mark7747 (talk) 13:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Maestro Ivanković 19:45, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Burgundo (talk) 15:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 22:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 15:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 20:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --AGK ■ 23:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 02:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Riottoso (talk) 08:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:58, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 14:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 21:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 14:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:30, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 21:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Marshallsumter (talk) 02:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 13:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Schniggendiller edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: de-N, en-3
Personal info: This is my second confirmation. Last year I stated that "I'm able to keep my overall activity level or even increase it." Well, actually my activity level dropped (imho) dramatically; to some extent due to my professional life, and because of Covid, which had (and has) a great impact on my life.
I hope that I'm able to achieve improvements during the coming term. I still very much enjoy being a part of the wikiverse and the steward team and kindly ask for your trust in me for another term.

Comments about Schniggendiller edit

Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues. Helpful at times. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, competent, -jkb- 14:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep XenonX3 (talk) 15:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 16:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 18:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Werner von Basil (talk) 19:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Blablubbs (talk) 19:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Count Count (talk) 21:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bubo 容 21:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --ɱ 22:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Luke 081515 22:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --ZabeMath (talk) 22:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Funkruf (talk) 22:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 00:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No concerns. Meiræ 05:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 09:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Johannnes89 (talk) 11:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep well done! Please go on. --Agathenon (talk) 15:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —viciarg⁴¹⁴ 20:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good job :-) -- Ra'ike (talk) 22:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep excellent steward; speaking from experience, once you get the LTAs with exceptionally descriptive usernames, it's clear that you're good people :) TonyBallioni (talk) 22:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 03:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gereon K. (talk) 08:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active steward, especially in global locking and blocking. --Uncitoyen^talk 08:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 10:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gripweed (talk) 10:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity — NickK (talk) 13:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, thanks --PerfektesChaos (talk) 14:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep cool wäre ein Klick :) --Itti (talk) 22:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alraunenstern۞ 22:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.--جار الله (talk) 02:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Helfmann (talk) 15:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 17:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Aspiriniks (talk) 21:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geolina163 (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I don't see any problems. -- CptViraj (talk) 13:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rmcharb (talk) 19:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --MarcelBuehner (talk) 22:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- 94rain ^Talk 06:51, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --SDKmac (talk) 13:46, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Graphikus (talk) 22:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nehaoua (talk) 23:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 02:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Björn Hagemann (talk) 09:26, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 21:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --LexICon (talk) 01:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Lutheraner (talk) 12:16, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Maestro Ivanković 19:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mombacher (talk) 16:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep /Julle (talk) 20:13, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 22:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 14:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 15:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --AGK ■ 23:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kein Einstein (talk) 19:40, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Snookerado (talk) 20:35, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 02:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wetterwolke (talk) 12:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Regiomontanus (talk) 03:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 14:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Coffins (talk) 21:05, 22 February 2021 (UTC)—[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 21:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pentachlorphenol (talk) 11:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --1971markus (talk) 18:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 14:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:30, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 21:39, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:51, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stefan64 (talk) 08:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 13:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stobaios (talk) 13:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bärbel Miemietz (talk) 13:55, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shanmugamp7 edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages:
Personal info: Hi All, I have been a steward since 2014, this is my Seventh confirmation. My activity levels were decreased in the past year due to personal reasons, covid, etc. Though I am not sure how 2021 will be, I am hopeful that I can be more active in the wiki world. so I would like to continue another year if I have the community support. Any feedback is most welcome. Thanks and Regards --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 12:32, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Shanmugamp7 edit

Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 18:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep great to see a Tamil speaking steward :-) —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 00:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meiræ 05:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 09:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep old hands are good hands to keep around :) TonyBallioni (talk) 22:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 03:44, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Booradleyp1 (talk) 03:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep You tried to be active every month as possible so it's okay. --Uncitoyen^talk 08:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 10:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good mix of experience and activity — NickK (talk) 13:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 02:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 21:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 22:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 15:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --AGK ■ 23:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 02:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 14:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 21:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 15:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 21:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:51, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 13:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sotiale edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: ko-N, en-2, ja-1, zh-1, bi-1, tpi-0.5, eo-1
Personal info: Hello, everyone! This is ~~your handy~~ Sotiale.
This is my first confirmation. I've tried to help in every area I can, without specifying a special field of activity. Among them, I think I have faithfully fulfilled my promise to help SRCU, which I promised you at SE2020, and to deal with spambots and LTAs.
Here is a brief report of what I have promised you (2020 logs only):
- I have processed approximately 80% of SRCU requests(247/307) since I was appointed.
- I have locked 19,274(!) accounts of LTAs, xwiki abusers and spambots.
- I have blocked about 5,000+ spambots exploit proxies.
- Except in December when I was in the hospital, I always connected to IRC channel to help users and handle urgent OS requests.
In addition, through the steward tool, I did the following:
- I have renamed 1,470 accounts.
- I help with Wikimedia incubator work and have been dedicated to changing Wikisets.
- I have also worked on SRP, SRGP, and GS.
- I have handled almost all OTRS stew-queue Chinese tickets.
All tasks were handled by hand, and there was no automated work. I'm well aware that the community has allowed me to do my role with the highest support rate in SE2020, and I have felt responsible for it. Nevertheless, sometimes my work may not have been enough to satisfy you due to my limitations. Considering everything about my activities, now you can re-determine whether you need me or not. As always, I will follow the consensus of the community. Thank you! --Sotiale (talk) 12:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Sotiale edit

Keep, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, The contribution of Sotiale in SRCU is obvious to all, and I think he is very suitable to be a stewards.--メッキの光の勇者-猫🇨🇳Drink tea in tea room🐱 14:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Thank you for your contribution of SRCU and SRG. --SCP-2000 14:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, for their contributions at SRCU alone, not to mention their other work. Blablubbs (talk) 14:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure! Thanks for all your work! :) --Superpes15 (talk) 14:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Wow! "locked 19,274(!) accounts of LTAs" thanks! Keep up the good work!--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Data talk. What else do I need to say? --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 14:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks so much for doing all the thankless work, can't appreciate you enough. Thanks for your assistance in SR and elsewhere, indeed very excellent steward. 감사합니다. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for your work : ) --Yining Chen (Talk) 14:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep needs to buy an instant pot, though. Even stewards need to eat. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep obviously. --IWI (talk) 14:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Amanda (aka DQ) 15:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Sotiale's (perhaps excessively modest) en-2 prevented me from just asking them the same question I've asked others, but I'd be inclined to just directly support them anyway for clearly high level performance. Nosebagbear (talk) 15:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Saroj Uprety (talk) 15:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 18:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per contributions in SRCU. ネイ (talk) 18:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep GeneralNotability (talk) 18:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mz7 (talk) 18:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep YuzaTea (talk) 18:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 22:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose 15.000 Checkuser in just one year can't be done in compliance with the applicable rules. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I really suppose you should read the CheckUser requests from zhwiki and yuewiki. Practically almost daily requests or even more three or four requests per day and dozens of accounts checked each request for some times, according to Sotiale's usual way for always checking for sleepers, 15000 CUs doesn't really seem much. LuciferianThomas．Talk 09:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
4 * 365 = 1,460, not 15,000. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 21:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@LuciferianThomas Hello, what they are talking about isn't CU for zh/zh-yue or any local projects, they are saying they are doing too many CUs in loginwiki which is usually used for Steward requests/Global requests, which of course some zh LTAs are reported there too like 囧、KAGE etc. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you compare checks from past 4-5 years, you will get an idea how such checks are increasing and if Sotiale took the load of this increasing trend, we should be thankful to them. Some stats: 2017:21,964, 2018:41,740, 2019:53,483, 2020:81,829. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"CU is being increasingly misused" does not equate to "This is a good Steward for doing 15,000 CUs in one year". — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 21:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 00:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Sotiale did a lot for zhwiki`s HAM-SRCU and anti-vandalism. Obviously, Sotiale is a great Steward! --Zhuofan Wu^{Cien años de soledad} 03:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I would like to take this chance to thank Sotiale for their help combating xwiki abuse and sockpuppetry. H78c67c (talk) 04:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep,Thank you for your work on zhwiki! --Temp3600 (talk) 04:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, thanks for your outstanding work on zhwiki. Stang 04:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, ditto. --AnYiLin^Talk 05:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. One of the most active stewards in 2020 (especially in SRCU area). Helpful and competent. No concerns. Meiræ 05:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of most active stewards in last year. Sotiale is relevant in every area, although especially active in SRCU, SRG, SRP. Also helpful. --Uncitoyen^talk 07:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. 편리한 도구가 되어주셔서 감사합니다:) --*Youngjin (talk) 07:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course. I have been helped many times by your good job. --mirinano (talk) 07:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Mtarch11 (talk) 08:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 09:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Sotiale definitely did a great job as a steward, being very helpful with the fairly CheckUser requests (especially from zhwiki). --LuciferianThomas．Talk 09:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. —— Eric Liu_{（留言．百科用戶頁）} 09:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. – Srđan (talk) 09:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~~for consuming more coffee~~ please take good care of your health as well. --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 11:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--باسم (talk) 17:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Michel Bakni (talk) 17:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :)--evrifaessa ❯❯❯ talk 18:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly a major positive for our projects. Thank you very much for all your hard work! Waggie (talk) 20:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trustworthy, helpful, patient, friendly, observant, and leaves no stone unturned in search for socks! --Ivi104 (talk) 00:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 03:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: An old friend of zhwiki. --Easterlies (talk) 06:09, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep:Let go,don't afraid OC's,you always can not make the subject of Ombuds investigation,also,I believe you do anything.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 08:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 10:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, very strong activity on SRCU — NickK (talk) 13:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --MilkyDefer (talk) 13:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Giraffer (talk) 14:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 16:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Techyan（Talk） 21:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 00:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Absolutely, KEEP. A thanks form Chinese Wikis.--ℑ𝔪𝔭𝔞𝔯𝔱𝔦𝔞𝔩 𝔧𝔲𝔰𝔱 🎙️ 01:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theodore Xu (talk) 03:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Thanks for the great work. --Sun8908 (talk) 05:57, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Yair rand (talk) 06:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --水可煮粥，亦可赛艇 ^{听取蛙声一片人生经验} 14:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Thank your contribution to zhwp's CU. --Kasaki Mizore^Talk 14:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steven Sun (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Tece Onir (talk) 03:20, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Itcfangye (talk) 05:16, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. —〚 Arronwan 〛 06:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for all your work with chinese!--舞月書生_{𐙼Active at zh.wikipedia, strive to be a good Wikipedian.𐦉} 12:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thank you!--RuiyuShen 12:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :I trust you.--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 03:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thank you for your work -- 94rain ^Talk 04:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --12З4567 (talk) 05:03, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Air7538 (talk) 07:32, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lymantria (talk) 13:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course! hope Sotiale will leave some SRCU request to me --Alaa :)..! 18:03, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 01:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --EdwardAlexanderCrowley (talk) 08:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good IRC activity. While you topped the 2020 elections, your StewardMark percentile is about 85, which is 1 SD above average. So not the best ever, but that's irrelevant for the confirmation and I have no issues there. Leaderboard (talk) 20:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 21:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --LexICon (talk) 01:12, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Mark7747 (talk) 13:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Maestro Ivanković 19:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Q8j (talk/CA) 01:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep /Julle (talk) 20:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 22:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AVSmalnad77 ^talk 07:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 14:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 20:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Don-kun (talk) 19:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gluo88 (talk) 19:06, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral: 15,000 CUs in one year by one editor is something we need to see clearer justification for. CU is an invasive tool, not a hammer with which to treat every issue as a nail to hit. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 21:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think there are people who have questions about CU stats, so I would like to explain. Loginwiki stats isn't the usual checkuser you think. Loginwiki only retains the information at the time of account creation, and only accounts created within 3 months(to be precise, 90 days). Therefore, loginwiki is primarily intended for spambots and LTAs. The place where login information remains is your wiki and not loginwiki. If there are about 5,000 proxies used by spambots, 2 logs are left in order to browse the proxy IP and browse other spambots accounts created with that IP. Therefore, 10,000 logs are recorded. The rest is either locking LTAs, or short blocking of cross-wiki abuse IPs. My activity can be monitored by ombuds at any time, and I'm always doing a checkuser with a rationale for function usage with this in mind. If it is a problem that I worked hard in my role, I will gradually reduce my Wikimedia activities. Perhaps this will be good for me too. --Sotiale (talk) 23:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(This is not an answer for you, it is an answer for anyone who has a question about loginwiki stats for me. Thanks for your opinion!) --Sotiale (talk) 23:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sotiale,I don't think you should gradually reduce your Wikimedia activities,I quite satisfied your work,and I always think you are doing the right things,especially you help our community!--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 09:17, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, and thanks for your contribution! --Lightyears_Talk 12:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 15k CU actions is not at all abnormal. On Wikidata alone, Sotiale already does a large proportion of our high case load. I really like how some above are casting aspersions without evidence of actual wrongdoing.—Jasper Deng (talk) 20:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Baycrest (talk) 17:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:58, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pedram^Talk 08:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DRIZZLE _(Talk） 09:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 14:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 21:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 04:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cabayi (talk) 14:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --LuchoCR (talk) 19:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 14:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 21:47, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:52, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep DraconicDark (talk) 01:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Marshallsumter (talk) 02:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep-Manchiu (talk) 03:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 11:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 13:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stryn edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: fi, en-3
Personal info: Hi.
I have served as a steward since March 2015 and I would be interested to continue for another year. Last year I was extremely busy in real life because of personal reasons so I didn't have so much time for steward tasks (I also informed my colleagues by mail beforehand). I hope this year it will change, and I will be again more active. I feel I can still be useful in this position. My activity is focusing in blocking cross wiki vandals and spambots and changing user rights and rename users. I'm available on IRC when I can and I follow actively my email. I count as my home wikis the Finnish Wikipedia, Meta-Wiki and Wikidata, in which all I'm an administrator.
Thanks, Stryn (talk) 12:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Stryn edit

Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course, my pleasure to vote keep. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Säilytettävä Majavah (talk!) 14:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 14:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I hope you are together this year. --Sotiale (talk) 15:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep experiences with them have been positive. --IWI (talk) 15:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Szoltys (talk) 15:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 18:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ToBeFree (talk) 22:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 00:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No concerns. Meiræ 05:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 09:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--باسم (talk) 17:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ibrahim.ID ✪ 19:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 03:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active steward. --Uncitoyen^talk 08:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 10:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good work, hope you will be able to be more active in 2021 — NickK (talk) 13:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 16:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep cool wäre ein Klick :) --Itti (talk) 22:44, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep jni (talk) 07:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Iluvatar (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 13:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- 94rain ^Talk 04:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lymantria (talk) 13:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 18:04, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nehaoua (talk) 23:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 02:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 21:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Maestro Ivanković 19:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lentokonefani (talk) 14:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 08:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep /Julle (talk) 20:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 22:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AVSmalnad77 ^talk 07:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 14:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 15:51, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 20:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --AGK ■ 23:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Jules ^Talk 11:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -kyykaarme (talk) 18:40, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 03:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 14:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 21:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --4shadoww (talk) 04:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cabayi (talk) 14:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Yair rand (talk) 05:11, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 14:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:52, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 21:54, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 11:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 13:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tegel edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: sv, en-3
Personal info: I have now been a Steward for nine years now so this is my ninth confirmation. My activity this year has been similar to previous years with a lot of spam-bots and cross-wiki vandalism. I can often be found on IRC for dealing with emergencies. With your support I would like to continue for another year. -- Tegel _(Talk) 16:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Tegel edit

Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per my usual stand if Tegel cannot be kept, who can. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 14:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question Hi, the discussion at Requests for comment/Site-wide administrator abuse and WP:PILLARS violations on the Croatian Wikipedia has been pending a close for the entirety of the last term, and has not had any Steward significantly discuss with the participants its status, despite a couple of requests and the more recent passing of the meta closure of rfc policy. Could you explain why a) you and b) the Stewards as a whole, failed to close (and, as applicable, execute, it)? As a connected point to the most likely answers (too complicated, insufficiently clear remedies, not in remit, etc) could you clarify both why it/they apply but also why you/the Stewards didn't make that known to every participant and ask for specific actions taken to make it possible for the Stewards to act on it, despite the insane timescale? Nosebagbear (talk) 15:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sotiale (talk) 15:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mehman 97 15:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 18:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Barkeep49 (talk) 18:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep Not a big fan of "feeding the troll", but otherwise no serious concerns. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 00:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --IWI (talk) 03:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No concerns. Meiræ 05:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 09:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Johannnes89 (talk) 11:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thank you for your service!! Waggie (talk) 20:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 04:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very active steward. --Uncitoyen^talk 08:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 10:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, you managed to survive as an active steward until the closing of the Tegel Airport! — NickK (talk) 13:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep cool wäre ein Klick :) --Itti (talk) 22:44, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep jni (talk) 07:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 17:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Iluvatar (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 12:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- 94rain ^Talk 04:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 18:04, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nehaoua (talk) 23:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep-Manchiu (talk) 04:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 21:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --LexICon (talk) 01:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Zangala (talk) 10:45, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Maestro Ivanković 19:49, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 06:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep /Julle (talk) 20:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geolina163 (talk) 20:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 22:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AVSmalnad77 ^talk 07:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 14:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 15:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 20:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 15:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AGK ■ 22:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Jules ^Talk 11:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 03:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep EstrellaSuecia (talk) 11:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 14:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 21:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pentachlorphenol (talk) 11:29, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 14:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 21:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Marshallsumter (talk) 02:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 11:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 13:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tks4Fish edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: pt-N, en-5, es-2, it-2
Personal info: Hello everyone! This is my first steward confirmation.
This year I was very active, though not as much as I'd hoped for due to online classes, which are harder to me than in-person ones. While active, I mostly handled global locks and blocks for LTAs, spambots, crosswiki abusers, and the likes, and also rights granting, while always being available on IRC for requests.
I think I did a good work this year, and hope to be reconfirmed for this year. Thank you! —Thanks for the fish! ^{talk•contribs} 16:26, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Tks4Fish edit

Keep. Competent and active steward. Blablubbs (talk) 14:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Giraffer (talk) 14:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Your first reconfirmation? Really? I thought you had already been a steward for several years, which is definitely a good sign. Naleksuh (talk) 14:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for your timely intervention in many of the LTA cases, indeed thankful for all your activities a steward. :P Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I’m not panicking. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Amanda (aka DQ) 15:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Your username should not be realized. Yes, not yet. --Sotiale (talk) 15:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question Hi, the discussion at Requests for comment/Site-wide administrator abuse and WP:PILLARS violations on the Croatian Wikipedia has been pending a close for the entirety of the last term, and has not had any Steward significantly discuss with the participants its status, despite a couple of requests and the more recent passing of the meta closure of rfc policy. Could you explain why a) you and b) the Stewards as a whole, failed to close (and, as applicable, execute, it)? As a connected point to the most likely answers (too complicated, insufficiently clear remedies, not in remit, etc) could you clarify both why it/they apply but also why you/the Stewards didn't make that known to every participant and ask for specific actions taken to make it possible for the Stewards to act on it, despite the insane timescale? Nosebagbear (talk) 15:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Nosebagbear! As most people know, the hrwiki situation is a huge mess. As Krd already said, no individual steward wants to evaluate it alone, due to the scale of problems there. There was some internal discussion over the whole situation, but, as Mardetanha has also said, there was some WMF developments on this, who would be the most appropriate ones to handle this in my opinion, but I have no more information on how that is going. —Thanks for the fish! ^{talk•contribs} 19:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active, trusted and no concerns from me. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | enwiki} 15:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course. --IWI (talk) 15:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Praxidicae (talk) 15:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Spicy (talk) 15:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Saroj Uprety (talk) 15:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzyck (talk) 16:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Galahad (sasageyo!)^(esvoy) 16:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure! --Superpes15 (talk) 16:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 1989 (talk) 17:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 18:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Incredibly accessible on IRC and thoughtful. Barkeep49 (talk) 18:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with great delight. KevinL (aka L235 · t) 18:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Definitely. GeneralNotability (talk) 18:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mz7 (talk) 18:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — xaosflux ^Talk 19:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 00:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 04:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Active, helpful and competent. No concerns. Meiræ 05:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very competent --Mtarch11 (talk) 08:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Happily! --Jack Frost (talk) 09:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 09:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Johannnes89 (talk) 11:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--باسم (talk) 17:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 18:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 18:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--evrifaessa ❯❯❯ talk 18:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ibrahim.ID ✪ 19:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very responsive, very responsible with the tools. I never panic when Tks4Fish is around! Thank you for your service!! Waggie (talk) 20:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Helpful and quick! --Ivi104 (talk) 00:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 04:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the most active stewards last year. Tks4Fish did a good job in every area. --Uncitoyen^talk 09:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 10:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove,feel Lovehksingers should global lock.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, very good first year — NickK (talk) 13:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.--جار الله (talk) 02:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Iluvatar (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 12:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very competent -- Vanthorn (talk) 04:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- 94rain ^Talk 04:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sun8908 (talk) 11:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yes of course! --Alaa :)..! 18:04, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nehaoua (talk) 23:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Em-mustapha ^{User | talk} 23:26, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 01:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 21:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Excelente em tudo que se propõe. Érico (talk) 02:49, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Mark7747 (talk) 13:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Maestro Ivanković 19:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mykola7 (talk) 21:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Competent and active steward.--Luensu1959 (talk) 22:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 08:52, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --ZabeMath (talk) 11:47, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 14:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep /Julle (talk) 20:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trustful and hard work user. Certamente continuará o bom trabalho. Dux Praxis (talk) 16:53, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 22:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AVSmalnad77 ^talk 07:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 14:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 15:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 20:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep É um editor competente e, certamente, será muito bom para a Wikipédia mantê-lo nessa função. Fabiojrsouza (talk) 22:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lechatjaune (talk) 23:49, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AGK ■ 22:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 03:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Joalpe (talk) 10:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 14:29, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly competent and overall good steward. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 15:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—---Coffins (talk) 21:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly competent steward. Had pleasent interactions with them before. –Davey2010^Talk 21:47, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 04:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cabayi (talk) 14:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --LuchoCR (talk) 19:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 14:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 21:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Marshallsumter (talk) 02:07, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 11:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 13:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trijnstel edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
Personal info: Hello everyone,
2020 has been a rough year for many of us. For me personally it couldn't have been more different than the year before.
I started my tenth term with much enthusiasm, but as time went by reality struck me. Due to personal reasons I couldn't keep up with everything. I successfully handled the mailing list and private wiki requests, and also tried to do some steward actions, but I simply didn't have enough time to do everything I wanted. While I expect that the coming year is more calm for me, I must be honest with you. I'm not sure whether I can go back to my old activity. Still: I wish to prolong my stewardship - next October I'll be a steward for 10 years already, and I hope I can be both more active and be able to share my experience and knowledge with the newbies. I'm looking forward to your opinions and hope I could get the opportunity to show I'm still useful to the current stewards group. Thank you.
Trijnstel_talk 14:52, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Trijnstel edit

Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure, mailing list management is a thankless task and I thank you for that. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 14:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep kind and wonderful person who is helpful behind the scenes to the global functionary teams. We are very lucky she still wants to serve. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Amanda (aka DQ) 15:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think Trijnstel is playing an irreplaceable role in the team. I hope they will be together this year. --Sotiale (talk) 15:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mehman 97 15:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Galahad (sasageyo!)^(esvoy) 16:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yes, please,--MrJaroslavik (talk) 16:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 17:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Blablubbs (talk) 17:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Barkeep49 (talk) 18:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 18:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep KevinL (aka L235 · t) 18:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mz7 (talk) 18:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active steward and a steward who is very helpful with mailing lists problems, mailing lists management and IRC. --Uncitoyen^talk 18:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — xaosflux ^Talk 19:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Superpes15 (talk) 00:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep helpful steward and good experiences with her. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 00:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Richardkiwi (talk) 01:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No concerns. Meiræ 05:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 09:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 09:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Johannnes89 (talk) 11:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--باسم (talk) 17:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I understand that life intercedes sometimes. Trijnstel is a major net positive for our projects and I think we'd be very lucky to have them continue on as steward in whatever capacity they are able. Waggie (talk) 20:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I hope your 2021 turns out better than 2020 for you. But don't feel guilty if you can't be active a lot of time. Every minute given by a volunteer is a gift by itself. Platonides (talk) 23:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 04:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 10:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, very helpful on onboarding new checkusers — NickK (talk) 13:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Woordenbrij2 (talk) 15:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Daniuu (talk) 17:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep cool wäre ein Klick :) --Itti (talk) 22:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alraunenstern۞ 22:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 21:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 10:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- 94rain ^Talk 04:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lymantria (talk) 13:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 18:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nehaoua (talk) 23:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 21:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. One of the best in the current team! Érico (talk) 02:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Zangala (talk) 09:37, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Maestro Ivanković 19:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mykola7 (talk) 21:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 09:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 14:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep /Julle (talk) 20:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Faisal ^talk 05:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. chansey ^message? 13:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Despite lower activity easy to reach, so no issues. --Base (talk) 22:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 14:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 15:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 20:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 15:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AGK ■ 22:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Jules ^Talk 11:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep TheDragonhunter (talk) 22:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 03:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 14:29, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 21:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. As in previous elections, I have no confidence in someone who made decisions on the Dutch Wikipedia on biased opinions of others. The Geo (talk) 11:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cabayi (talk) 14:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Vinvlugt (talk) 22:32, 24 February 2021 (UTC) - ja duhuh[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 14:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:54, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 21:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 09:30, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 11:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 13:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. Choosing to type in all-caps (to indicate 'shouting') shows the possibility that communication may not be the ideal needed for the role. ~Lofty abyss 13:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vituzzu edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: IT, EN, SCN
Personal info: This year was clearly characterized by the impact of the pandemics which forced me to move most of my activities on PC, leaving me with very few available energy to spend here. Rather than acting without the possibility of a proper follow-up of my actions I preferred to even don't log-in, just keeping an eye to the OTRS. I'm still interested in the Wikimedia world, thus I'm back again, with a fairly level of activity.

Comments about Vituzzu edit

Keep Fully active again, always available, No issues! --Superpes15 (talk) 14:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Aplasia (talk) 14:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thank you for serving, one of the finest, very glad to see you run for another year in confirmations. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Parma1983 (talk) 14:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 14:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep••Pierpao (talk) 14:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GC85 (talk) 14:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have heard of Vituzzu's opinions, and still believe Vituzzu can play a part in the team. --Sotiale (talk) 15:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if there’s neo-fascist LTAs obsessed with you, you’re doing something right. Thank you for your excellent service, Vito, so much of which is behind the scenes. It is noticed and appreciated. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Blablubbs (talk) 15:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Saroj Uprety (talk) 15:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I don't see any problems. -- CptViraj (talk) 17:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 18:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Biased. --Kusurija (talk) 18:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — xaosflux ^Talk 19:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 00:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No concerns. Meiræ 05:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Biased.--Auvajs (talk) 06:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Civvì (talk) 08:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sîmbotin (talk) 08:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 09:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --НУРшЯGIO^{(beware of the moose)} 11:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Lemure Saltante (talk) 14:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Luke 081515 16:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 18:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Mirer (talk) 04:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 10:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Vituzzu said less active this year, but since Vituzzu has been one of the most active stewards for years, Vituzzu's lightly low activity this year is no problem. Also helpful in the background for IRC and mailing list etc. --Uncitoyen^talk 10:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no concerns — NickK (talk) 13:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep cool wäre ein Klick :) --Itti (talk) 22:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 21:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Equoreo (talk) 16:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 18:06, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nehaoua (talk) 23:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 02:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --.snoopy. ✉ 13:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 21:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --LexICon (talk) 01:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Maestro Ivanković 19:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mykola7 (talk) 21:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. chansey ^message? 13:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Burgundo (talk) 15:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 22:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 14:39, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 15:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 20:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AGK ■ 22:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kein Einstein (talk) 19:42, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Riottoso (talk) 08:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 14:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 21:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cabayi (talk) 14:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Hdiddan (talk) 11:15, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 14:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 21:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 11:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 13:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wim b edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: it, en-2
Personal info: Hello Everyone, the second year is gone. In this year I have contributed like the past year: primarily fighting spambots and cross-wiki vandals. It was a difficult year due to more work commitments than in previous years, but despite this I have tried to give and I intend to give a lot more to the project: I helped clear the page of SRG, CU, user renaming, blocking spambot and OP. I hope to have the opportunity to help WMF projects by serving as a steward for yet another year.

Comments about Wim b edit

Keep Very helpful and always kind! Active with spambots and CUs (but also in all other steward activities)! --Superpes15 (talk) 14:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Aplasia (talk) 14:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Spambots, SRG, SRP, I seen them almost everywhere, a fine steward and thanks for serving. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Parma1983 (talk) 14:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep••Pierpao (talk) 14:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GC85 (talk) 14:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sotiale (talk) 15:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 15:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Saroj Uprety (talk) 15:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 16:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 18:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — xaosflux ^Talk 19:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --IWI (talk) 20:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 22:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 00:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep he has given me advice on pasta and other foods before, which is an exceptionally valuable service. Thank you. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Highly active steward. No concerns. Meiræ 05:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Civvì (talk) 08:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 09:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --НУРшЯGIO^{(beware of the moose)} 12:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lemure Saltante (talk) 14:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Helpful, and not lazy. --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 03:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 04:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 10:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very active steward, especially for global locks and blocks. --Uncitoyen^talk 10:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 11:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity — NickK (talk) 13:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 13:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 21:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Iluvatar (talk) 00:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- 94rain ^Talk 04:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Equoreo (talk) 16:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 18:06, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nehaoua (talk) 23:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 01:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --.snoopy. ✉ 13:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Maestro Ivanković 19:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mykola7 (talk) 21:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Burgundo (talk) 15:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 22:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 15:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 20:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:25, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 03:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 14:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 21:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cabayi (talk) 14:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep thank you for all you do on itwiktionary.--Hdiddan (talk) 21:38, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 14:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:17, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 21:58, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Marshallsumter (talk) 02:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 11:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 13:08, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

علاء edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2021 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: ar, en-4, he-1 and es-1
Personal info: Hello. This is my third confirmation. During last year I was active dealing with requests mostly on SRG, SRCU, SRUC and various other tasks from time to time. In addition, I used my steward access for fighting cross-wiki abuse/vandals/spammers and LTAs. Also, I frequently spend time on various IRC channels.
Over the past year, I'm being more active on SRG (especially global un/block), admin activity review, Global AbuseFilter, help on SRUC complicated requests and other tasks. Also, I cooperated with a lot of local CUs and sysops to solve cross-wiki issues (of course, with the help of global sysops).
Generally(CentralAuth), I'm bureaucrat, sysop and checkuser on Arabic Wikipedia, and sysop on multiple projects (especially Wikidata and Commons). Over the years, I have made more than 453K edits on Wikimedia wikis.
I would be happy to continue for another term. If you have any questions or comments or suggestions, I would be glad to hear them. Thank you--Alaa :)..! 09:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about علاء edit

Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Blablubbs (talk) 14:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thank you for your efforts! --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 14:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep great steward and a kind person as well. Very lucky to have him. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course, per Tony, very kind, approachable steward and very responsive in xwiki issues. Surely worthy of a keep. Thanks so much for your work Alaa. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Best representative for Arabs . Ahmed Naji ^Talk 14:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep An active steward. Also very helpful in AAR works. --Uncitoyen^talk 14:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure! Arash ツ 14:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alaa is always helpful, friendly, and still a great colleague on the team. --Sotiale (talk) 15:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Amanda (aka DQ) 15:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 15:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --ToprakM ^✉ 16:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 16:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 💕 Praxidicae (talk) 16:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Barkeep49 (talk) 18:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 18:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep KevinL (aka L235 · t) 18:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — xaosflux ^Talk 19:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --IWI (talk) 20:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for your efforts. --NANöR (talk) 21:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 22:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep for sure :-) —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 00:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 04:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. No concerns. Meiræ 05:59, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 06:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 09:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 09:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – أمين (talk) 16:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Michel Bakni (talk) 17:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--باسم (talk) 17:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - دنيا (talk) 18:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 18:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active, cooperative and helpful steward --Ibrahim.ID ✪ 19:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yes. --Mervat (talk) 19:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active, responsive, responsible. What else can I say? Thank you for your service! Waggie (talk) 20:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Superpes15 (talk) 23:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Spicy (talk) 00:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 04:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 10:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 11:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure! --Mtarch11 (talk) 12:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good contribution to the steward team — NickK (talk) 13:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure! --Elmie (talk) 17:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | enwiki} 20:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Techyan（Talk） 21:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep cool wäre ein Klick :) --Itti (talk) 22:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.--جار الله (talk) 01:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.--Kasaki Mizore^Talk 14:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Iluvatar (talk) 00:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Very active and cooperative person. Best wishes. --Dr-Taher (talk) 10:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 11:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 12:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ahmetlii (talk) 15:41, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- 94rain ^Talk 04:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zhuofan Wu^{Cien años de soledad} 10:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Manchiu (talk) 13:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nehaoua (talk) 22:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Fjmustak (talk) 22:34, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Em-mustapha ^{User | talk} 23:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- ARASH PT talk 13:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 21:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active user and a hard worker . --ساندرا (talk) 23:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 05:18, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep /Julle (talk) 20:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep without any doubt.--Faisal ^talk 05:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for your service to all communities. Sure keep. chansey ^message? 13:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 22:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AVSmalnad77 ^talk 07:39, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He is always an active, cooperative, and helpful person and an approachable steward.--Azniv Stepanian (talk) 13:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 14:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 15:59, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 20:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --1233 （T / C） 14:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AGK ■ 22:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Jules ^Talk 11:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 03:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --‍‍‍Pedram^Talk 08:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 14:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep +1 ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 20:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 21:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Active and friendly steward --Sky xe (talk) 22:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cabayi (talk) 14:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 14:11, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 21:58, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Marshallsumter (talk) 02:11, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Firestar464 (talk) 10:30, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 11:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 13:12, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]