Stewards/Confirm/2019/-revi

-revi edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: ko, en-3
Personal info: Hey, I'm revi. I have been doing lots of things this year, including familiar stuff of SRP (and SRGP/SRB), Global Rename business, as well as locking LTAs and spambots and pushing myself into unfamiliar areas with SRCU. I have been taking care of SRCU request for zhwiki (after their local CU permission was removed by WMF Office action), though I have to accept I probably have burned out handling their request by end of year and had to take break from SRCU to recover myself. I also respond to Oversight requests and other enquiries sent to OTRS.
This is my first confirmation as a steward, and I look forward to continuing the same work in 2019 as I did in 2018, if the community wishes so.

Full disclosure

I still work for / provide service to the WMF (see my SE2018 statement), but my contract is scheduled to end sometime this year. (Note that it can be extended.)
— regards, Revi 11:45, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

italiano:

Lingue:
Informazioni personali: translation needed

español:

Idiomas: ko, en-3
Información personal: Hola, soy revi, he estado haciendo muchas cosas este año, incluyendo cosas familiares de SRP (and SRGP/SRB), trabajo en renombramiento global, así como bloqueo de cuentas de abuso a largo plazo y spambots, y empujándome a áreas desconocidas con SRCU. He estado atendiendo la solicitud de SRCU para zhwiki (después de que su permiso local de CU fue eliminado por Acción de La Oficina de WMF), aunque tengo que aceptar que probablemente haya agotado el manejo de su solicitud para finales de año y haya tenido que tomar un descanso de SRCU para recuperarme. También respondo a solicitudes de supresión y otras consultas enviadas a OTRS.
Esta es mi primera confirmación como steward, y espero continuar con el mismo trabajo en 2019 que en 2018, si la comunidad así lo desea.

Revelación completa

Todavía trabajo para/proporciono servicio a WMF (vea mi declaración en SE2018), pero mi contrato está programado para terminar en algún momento de este año. (Tenga en cuenta que se puede ampliar.)
— regards, Revi 11:45, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

русский:

Языки:
Личная информация: translation needed

Deutsch:

Sprachen:
Informationen zur Person: translation needed

Nederlands:

Taalvaardigheid:
Persoonlijke informatie: translation needed

বাংলা:

ভাষা:
ব্যক্তিগত তথ্যাদি: translation needed

Comments about -revi edit

Keep --Stïnger （会話） 14:01, 8 February 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Keep duh Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:01, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
KeepVery active, good in crosswiki vandalism, COIbot, SR. However, I note two occassion where they fails to do an immediate CU as well as some perceived slowness in handling CU. Those aside, clear net positive. Language skills are a plus.--Cohaf (talk) more details of my vote here 14:02, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly active and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 14:06, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted and active, especially contributed a lot in dealing with SRCUs from zhwiki. Work appreciated.--無聊龍 (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per User:Vermont/SE/2019. Vermont (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I have no problem with your steward actions, but have concerns based on your perceived conduct at times. Leaderboard (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What does that even mean? I have no problem with descriptions without diffs in confirms since so much activity takes place on IRC, but they actually need to be descriptive unless the person isn’t a native English speaker, so it’s difficult to go into detail. You appear to be a native speaker, so there’s no excuse. If I had to bet, Leaderboard, this is yet another revenge vote because -revi was the one who told you that you couldn’t keep your failed RfCU open indefinitely until it hit 25 supports. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:19, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What's RfCU? Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 08:50, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TonyBallioni: What nonsense. Since when did my failed RfCU (Requests for CheckUser on en.wikibooks) have anything to do with this? I don't even recall him saying this in the first place. This is not a revenge vote, and please don't jump into unsubstantiated conclusions, thanks. Leaderboard (talk) 09:48, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You haven’t explained what your vote means. I’m going to assume my guess here is right. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:44, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TonyBallioni: Your guess has gone horribly wrong. Well, my concerns stem from Cohaf's note about handling zh.wiki CU requests. I noticed that he entirely stopped continuing a CU request simply because one user made somewhat inappropriate comments about him. While I do not condone the other user's attitude - they did deserve a block - it was poor of him to leave the request in an unfinished state for many days to the determent of the zh.wiki community. I also don't see him handling any further requests. Even on IRC, I noticed that his attitude is slightly condensing at times. Leaderboard (talk) 16:06, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so “Neutral because revi doesn’t like putting up with borderline racist comments.” That makes your revenge vote seem even pettier. Thanks for clarifying this to everyone. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:10, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

if you wish to read my response, it is. Collapsed for neatness.--Cohaf (talk) 16:50, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit conflict.)Leaderboard I beg your pardon, while I'm not especially pleased with how revi process zhwp SRCU speed, it is slow, it's not until the extent I will abstain my support. At times it is frustrating to wait for 6 - 7 days and this I must say. However, most of the other occassions other stewards will step up to help. I also note that revi doesn't have CU experience before Stewardship, hence, there is some learning curve and we should give the allowance. For the 2 incidents, one is over #wikipedia-zh (that was immediately needed as socks are out every time - he acknowledge he'll do it but didn't). However, the impact was minimal, as the CU is just for a range block to stop the socks from appearing. The socks are easily DUCKable. And in the end the master did use IPs to edit too - and we rangeblocked that and hence, it's a meh. In addition, do note that request came at 2AM local time for revi and it's reasonable for him to wish to rest and not do such CUs. Another occasion is the zhwikiversity case where he ask me to do a discussion which I don't see a need, that can be done immediately IMO. For that particular CU you referenced, I made remarks there and I have nothing more to add. Data was on CUwiki and while it may not be the best approach he could have taken, I will not fault so greatly (as it is once - off, if repeated that's another story). Revi has handled more than 50 CU requests before that and I feel that amount is fair enough. Other than those, he's still a fine CU working at SRCU and other immediate requests (such as potential compromised accounts) he did it. I hope this explains. --Cohaf (talk) 16:23, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral due to recent inactivity and your conduct. --云间守望 14:49, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Confirm and special thanks to this user. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Ammarpad (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I see them everywhere, and I haven't seen issues where I see them. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:56, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity. --Vogone (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep great steward overall. —Thanks for the fish! ^{talk•contribs} 15:09, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Absolutely.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:11, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep even if he is lazy :p TonyBallioni (talk) 15:13, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Doug Weller (talk) 15:31, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good work. – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:22, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Saederup92 (talk) 16:24, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Just positive experiences. --MarcoSwart (talk) 16:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, with thanks for your service. Miniapolis 17:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep truested, no concerns. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 18:01, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 19:12, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Thibaut120094 (talk) 20:03, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mkdw (talk) 21:08, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mz7 (talk) 21:18, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Consistently good --AGK ■ 21:43, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:54, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Would be a netloss if not kept. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 21:58, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Keep, active and helpful. — xaosflux ^Talk 22:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Hiàn (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.--جار الله (talk) 22:34, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 23:21, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:19, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Scrutineer for Persian Wikipedia elections. Thanks for your service. 4nn1l2 (talk) 02:59, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Muhraz (talk) 04:45, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per User:Leaderboard. ——SerialNumber54129 07:42, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.--BRP^ever 08:13, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Remove They should have a break and sleep more. Ankry (talk) 08:26, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the nicest stewards, I've ever come across. No-brainer. Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 08:50, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 08:54, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – KPFC 💬 11:03, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This kind of democracy makes infiltration by such persons inevitable. But let’s hope to see less privileges for petty censors. Remove. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:09, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm extremely familiar with -revi and they're helpful, friendly, co-operative. Their transparency and accountability is excellent as a Steward, always willing to explain actions to the limit of what they can divulge. Incnis Mrsi is sadly mistaken about file language, the Commons language policy explicitly states that "Files can be named in any language. The name of the file should be descriptive." so complaining about a user's English language ability when they requested filemover rights is, as -revi noted and then warned, unacceptable behaviour. A look through c:User talk:Incnis Mrsi will show it's not entirely unusual to find Incnis Mrsi being mistaken about Commons policies and guidelines, or to be workout outside of community consensus. Nick (talk) 14:22, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
-revi’s message is “Nobody gave you the right to judge other’s English skills under no circumstances” which shows that the disagreement is not about filemover rights, nor appears to be limited to Wikimedia Commons. As for :c:User_talk… can Nick please remind which position does Incnis Mrsi seek currently, or is about to apply for? The link Stewards/Elections_2019/Statements/Incnis_Mrsi is red, nor can we find c:Commons:Administrators/Requests/Incnis_Mrsi. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:17, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hhkohh (talk) 16:44, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Excellent work done in the last year! —AlvaroMolina (✉ - ✔) 17:50, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Esteban16 (talk) 19:34, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if you need a break, take one. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 19:37, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Itti (talk) 21:55, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Of-course! Kind regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 07:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Linedwell ^[talk] 08:34, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 08:58, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Super Wang hates PC _{You hate, too?} 09:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -J. Ansari Talk 09:46, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:05, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I hope that you can be better.--Rowingbohe (_Talk|zhwiki) 11:27, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 12:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alraunenstern۞ 15:13, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Dostojewskij (talk) 22:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for your help on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 23:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 07:42, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Very active, very helpful, and all our interactions have been excellent; a good keeper of the tools. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:36, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ibrahim.ID ✪ 15:39, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very helpful over IRC. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 08:14, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 08:46, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Nihlus 11:01, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good work during the year — NickK (talk) 15:30, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Joalpe (talk) 00:11, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 13:07, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —MarcoAurelio (talk) 13:39, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 13:46, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — billinghurst sDrewth 00:40, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 01:20, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ixocactus (talk) 03:39, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Galahad (sasageyo!)^(esvoy) 05:17, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Why not? A Korean is better than "no Asian". --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:26, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Good interactions and technical knowledge.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 15:40, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eurodyne (talk) 04:59, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
KeepDGG (talk) 07:17, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Uğurlar! ►Cekli 829 10:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SITH (talk) 12:26, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sandeep Raut (talk) 15:37, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Huji (talk) 01:24, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 05:26, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He like popcorn and sleep at 4am : good stewards ; Like it.Tomybrz Bip Bip 16:25, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ----Bonnielou2013 (talk) 23:10, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Udo T. (talk) 09:46, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. 100% human. I like his response at SRCU--1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 02:38, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, also helped a lot when dealing with zhwiki LTAs. Impressed by his quick response on IRC. --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 02:59, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DARIO SEVERI (talk) 10:32, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Klaas `Z4␟` V: 17:24, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Helpful and nice person with great sense of humour. Thanks for your work! Bencemac (talk) 17:42, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks! --Ruthven (msg) 18:00, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--*Youngjin (talk) 03:15, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 09:23, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:30, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Chico Venancio (talk) 14:39, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 15:45, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep TheDragonFire (talk) 08:51, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active steward and Thanks For All You Contributions --AFlorence (talk) 00:10, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Barkeep49 (talk) 01:57, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - QuiteUnusual (talk) 13:54, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Enfcer (talk) 23:32, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -★- PlyrStar93 _{→Message me. ←} 18:12, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:32, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 23:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 00:22, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 11:18, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 11:53, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 12:38, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]