Welcome to my talk page! All messages are welcome, provided that they are civil and made in good faith. If you would rather converse privately, please email me at firstname.lastname@example.org. Thank you.
Congratulations, Dear Administrator!Edit
Congratulations, Vermont! You now have the rights of an administrator on Meta-Wiki. Please take a moment to read the Meta:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat, and Meta:Requests for deletion, but also Talk:Spam blacklist and Talk:Interwiki map), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings, or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-admin. You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading although it doesn't always completely apply here at Meta. Please also check or add your entry to Meta:Administrators#List of administrators and the Template:List of administrators. You're also allowed to subscribe the metawiki admins private mailing list. Again, congratulations and welcome to the team. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:54, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
/* beautytohealth.com */Edit
I visited beautytohealth.com after almost falling for a scam product advertised on facebook. I was happy to see the website alert its readers about scams on the free trials. I am a daily reader of this website and came to know that the website is blacklisted on Wikipedia. Just because it was spammed with non-existing links.
My question is - How can wikipedia blacklist a website based on something like this?
Does this mean that anyone can spam wikipedia with links and wikipedia will simply blacklist that website?
I think you guys need to re-think about this.
- I see no possibility for that website to be used for a legitimate encyclopedic/beneficial purpose. Vermont (talk) 17:33, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
That's what you think as an individual. I am sure the website owner had nothing to offer under the table like other website owners do.
- Are you implying we only blacklist sites because they don't pay us money? Vermont (talk) 17:37, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- You've been told repeatedly to sign your edits. Also I'm pretty sure no one cares what the owner of a scammy spam site thinks. Praxidicae (talk) 17:38, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Yea right. Just do a simple search on Google and see how many of your editors take money to add links on Wikipedia. That is not a surprise I guess. BTW, I don't own any website. 17:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- You profoundly misunderstand the purpose of any Wikimedia projects. Have a nice day. Praxidicae (talk) 17:44, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
You profoundly have no answer or explanation to what I say. 17:44, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
All I can say is ... LOL. I will leave it here. I am not happy how this has been handled. I guess using the "unethical" techniques is only the way to live in this world. Sad... but true. 2406:3400:30F:B9D0:74E2:58C:AAA4:944D 17:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Truth Hurts :( 2406:3400:30F:B9D0:74E2:58C:AAA4:944D 17:55, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Muchas gracias por tu explicación.
Pero te agradeceria mucho que me hiciran Checkuser en todas las wikis, con todos los titeres que dicen que tengo por favor
Con la finalidad de desmentir una vez por todas todas las acusaciones falsas en mi contra. Te lo agredecería mucho.
No es para nada exagerado decir que Cuatro Remos ha estado de tras de todos mis bloqueos y de todas las guerras de ediciones
He pisado el palito y le ha resultado fantastico para él.
Lleva años en lo mismo como se puede apreciar facilmente.
Esperando que me hagan Checkuser, te Saluda afectuosamente --Historiadormundo (talk) 21:13, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
- Yo no soy un checkuser; no puedo ayudar con eso. Yo solicito a tú: por favor, detenes calumniar a Cuatro Remos. Si tu desees a culpar Cuatro Remos para tus problemas, proporcionar evidencia. (No en Meta-Wiki pero a el projecto donde estás bloqueado. Meta-Wiki no es para apelando bloqueados en otros projectos.) De otra manera, puede ser interpretado como un ataque personale. Gracias, Vermont (talk) 23:29, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Hola Vermont Muchas gracias por tu explicación y por tú actuar equilibrado ; lo unico que yo pretento es paz y tranquilidad; coloborar positivamente, y si me equivoco me lo digan en forma razonable y civilizada (no con reversiones reversiones y reversiones), muchas gracias y espero que algún día me desbloqueen en Commons.--Historiadormundo (talk) 14:32, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Requesting AWB accessEdit
Hey Vermont. I was wondering if you would be willing to grant me AWB access here on metawiki? I originally asked at Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat/Archives/2019-08#Requesting AWB access, but that was archived without a response from Base. I intend to use AWB to remove old translation tags from pages that were never actually marked for translation, while making it clear in my edit summary that, if translation is still desired, users should be free to revert my edits. This is so that translation admins don't go through and mark for translation pages that are no longer needed / should not have been translated in the first place. I am familiar with using AWB, and have access on enwiki. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 09:30, 26 August 2019 (UTC)