Afrikaans | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Boarisch | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца) | български | বাংলা | བོད་ཡིག | bosanski | català | کوردی | corsu | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Zazaki | ދިވެހިބަސް | Ελληνικά | emiliàn e rumagnòl | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | Nordfriisk | Frysk | galego | Alemannisch | ગુજરાતી | עברית | हिन्दी | Fiji Hindi | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Ido | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | ភាសាខ្មែរ | 한국어 | kar | kurdî | Limburgs | lietuvių | Minangkabau | македонски | മലയാളം | молдовеняскэ | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | مازِرونی | Napulitano | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | Kapampangan | Norfuk / Pitkern | polski | português | português do Brasil | پښتو | Runa Simi | română | русский | संस्कृतम् | sicilianu | سنڌي | Taclḥit | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | Soomaaliga | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ślůnski | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkmençe | Tagalog | Türkçe | татарча/tatarça | ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ  | українська | اردو | oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 吴语 | 粵語 | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/-

Welcome to Meta!Edit

Hello, جار الله. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum if you need help with something (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!

-- Meta-Wiki Welcome (talk) 23:18, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Quarry help neededEdit

I am from ta.wikimedia. I need a help from you to maintain In quarry, How can i get redirect pages of ta.wikipedia without any link? A example page--Info-farmer (talk) 03:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

@Info-farmer: this page [1] may help you.--جار الله (talk) 04:19, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
I am new to programming. If time permits, pls give the code.--Info-farmer (talk) 05:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
use tawiki_p;
FROM page
LEFT JOIN pagelinks
ON pl_from = page_id
WHERE pl_namespace IS NULL
LIMIT 1000;

this code for all page not redirect only, sorry i don't know alot about Quarry.--جار الله (talk) 19:12, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks indeed friend! I will learn to get.bye!--Info-farmer (talk) 05:05, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Presenting Community Engagement Insights survey report: Tuesday, October 10, 1600 UTCEdit

Hi جار الله,
I am reaching out to you because you signed up to receive updates about the Global Wikimedia survey.[1]

We will be hosting a public event online to present the data, a few examples on how teams will be using it for annual planning, and what are next steps for this project. The event will take place on Tuesday, October 10, at 9:00 am PST (1600 UTC), and the presentation will be in English. You can watch the livestream here, and ask question via IRC on #wikimedia-office.

If you are unable attend, you can also find the report on meta, and watch the recording of the event at a later time.

We hope to have you join us online! -- María Cruz 23:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

  1. Update your subscription to these messages by clicking here.

Locally documenting botEdit

Hi if JarBot is going to be operating locally here at Meta, please document the tasks that it will be doing on its user page. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:46, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Billinghurst: I will do but currently the system does not allow me to modify another user's page :)

I will move the list later to the Bot page,

Task Rate BRFA
Archiving daily experimental

.--جار الله (talk) 11:11, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

  Done You should be right to edit in the user ns.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:32, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Also, to run a bot here on meta, please fill out the bot request at Meta:Requests_for_adminship#Requests_for_bot_flags. — xaosflux Talk 15:21, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

@Xaosflux:   Done.--جار الله (talk) 22:19, 2 November 2018 (UTC)


Your bot is archiving threads less than 24 hours old, as seen here. This seems rather quick. Would you be able to code the bot to wait until the threads are untouched for at least 48/72 hours after being marked done or resolved? Thanks. Nihlus 13:11, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

@Nihlus: Hi, perhaps because of the time difference, yes I'll archiving after 72 hours, Thanks.--جار الله (talk) 13:30, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Actually stewards are fine with aggressive archiving. This has been agreed on stewards-l while ago. — regards, Revi 17:49, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
@-revi: Sorry, threads should not be archived 30 minutes after the last comment. Nihlus 06:35, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
@Nihlus: I will make it a day and a half, it will be at least more than 12 hour and maximum less than 48 hour, Thanks.--جار الله (talk) 19:59, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

You've got mailEdit

--Alaa :)..! 17:45, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

New email --Alaa :)..! 17:27, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Steward_requests/Global_permissions#Global_IP_block_exemption_request- there's a request since 3 Jan. Best --Alaa :)..! 12:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi @علاء: I fix it, thank you for noticing. Best --جار الله (talk) 13:03, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

? Olicallahan1246 (talk) 04:36, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

@Olicallahan1246 Please use the sandbox for editing tests. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
11:47, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Request to increase archiving rate for SRGEdit

Good day. My colleagues and I have been discussing (mentioning @-revi for reference) if it'd be possible for your bot to increase the archiving rate for Steward requests/Global to archive each 6 hours requests marked as {{status|done}} or {{status|not done}}. Given that it is a high traffic page, it tends to be crowded with handled requests sometimes, and would make it easier to watch if handled requests could be archived soon. Is it possible for you to do that? Thank you for your help. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:50, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello @MarcoAurelio: done, the bot will archiving each 6 hours requests marked as {{status|done}} or {{status|not done}} in Steward requests/Global page. Best regards, --جار الله (talk) 21:15, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello again. Thanks for the fix. However I note that your bot is not editting since today's midnight in UTC time. Is it experiencing any issues? Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:26, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello again. @MarcoAurelio: I test it on my device and it work fine, I will see if there is issues on the server. Best regards, --جار الله (talk) 03:18, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

SRP not being archivedEdit

Hello, can you see why it is not archiving old stuff on SRP? Thanks! — regards, Revi 12:11, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Also have a look at first request of SRM. Thank you! — regards, Revi 12:11, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Hello @-revi: for SRP please add === Miscellaneous requests === to archive page, and SRM done. Thanks! regards, --جار الله (talk) 16:05, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
    Is there are a larger framework to repair as this will continue month by month for any other major section. If necessary, we can just build the year ahead.  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
@Billinghurst: Creating all the months would be awesome. Thanks! regards, --جار الله (talk) 20:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
  Done I hope that in the next year we can find a way to progress without manual creations.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:25, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Steward requests/Bot status not being archived?! --Alaa :)..! 07:59, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
@علاء:   Done.--جار الله (talk) 04:33, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Bot stopped archivingEdit

Hey, looks like after 15 February bot is inactive, could you please look at the issue. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 02:08, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

@1997kB: Hello, it's because of moving tools from trusty to stretch, now it active. Best regards, --جار الله (talk) 09:48, 18 February 2019 (UTC)


SRGP now has a new section for 2FA testers, do you need to do something to properly archive it? (If then please do so)

Thanks! — regards, Revi 07:35, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Seems like bot is not archiving the stuff from 2FA sections, any possible cause for that? — regards, Revi 02:40, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi @-revi: done, regards.--جار الله (talk) 16:12, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Steward requests/GlobalEdit

This bot have removed a L2 heading as well as various open request under it. Please fix it.--GZWDer (talk) 06:32, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

مرحبًا جار الله، عذرًا ولكن هل تمت مراجعة هذه الملاحظة؟ شُكرًا لجهودك معنّا --Alaa :)..! 17:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

@GZWDer and علاء:Hello, sorry for the late reply. In the past few days when I wanted to edit my talk page I was getting this message "Your account or IP address has been blocked.". About wrong edit, I watched the bot edits on the page since this message and I didn't see any wrong edit. Please let me know if the bot removed the a L2 head or open request in the future. thanks.--جار الله (talk) 14:37, 12 October 2019 (UTC)


مرحبًا جار الله، هل يمكنك تعديل كود الأرشفة في صفحة Steward requests/Miscellaneous ليشمل القسم الجديد #OAuth permissions؟ تحياتي --Alaa :)..! 16:25, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

مرحبًا @علاء: تم، تحياتي لك.--جار الله (talk) 04:31, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

SRG redundant/locally handled requestsEdit

Hello. It seems that SRG requests marked as "redundant"/"local"(locally handled) do not get archived. Can you please take a look? Thanks! --94rain Talk 04:54, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello @94rain: would you please give me an example to work on it. Thanks.--جار الله (talk) 07:06, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi, "redundant" requests had been there for more two days without being archived. I thought turning them into {{status|not done|redundant}} can work, but still they did not get archived, until they were turned into a simple "not done" and were finally archived in this diff. "local" can be archived, but only after nearly two days. Is it designed on purpose to archive them after such a long period? --94rain Talk 07:38, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
@94rain: Yes, they asked me to wait 48 hours before archive most requests.--جار الله (talk) 07:54, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Oh. I see... I thought they were archived in the same time as "not done". Sorry for bothering and thank you for resolving my confusion. --94rain Talk 08:08, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

SRGP archivingEdit

Hey there!

Apparently the bot is not archiving SRGP requests when the status is "alreadydone", while it does so on SRG, see Special:Diff/20023253 and Special:Diff/20023252, where I changed the statuses to "done" and Special:Diff/20019770, where the bot archived requests newer than those, but not those.

Thanks for your help! Best, —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 16:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

The summary from this bot is "Bot: archiving 3 request to Steward requests/Global/2020-09". Shouldn't it be like "Bot: archiving 3 requests to Steward requests/Global/2020-09"? --Prahlad balaji (talk) 21:35, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello @Prahlad balaji: I will work on it, Thank you for the notice.--جار الله (talk) 10:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
No problem, thanks! --Prahlad balaji (talk) 19:21, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
"request(s)" will probably do for now. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
20:25, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Bot isn't archiving December requestsEdit

Hi. JarBot isn't archiving December requests on SR pages. -- CptViraj (talk) 07:51, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

JarBot bug?Edit

At 02:03, 18 May 2021, the bot archived two requests from SRG. However, the second of the requests was duplicated in the archive. I don't think this is intended behaviour. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
10:28, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

I have removed the duplicated section for now, though the same might have happened on different occasions. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
20:32, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
@1234qwer1234qwer4: I will see if there is any problem in the script and will fix it. Thanks.--جار الله (talk) 21:09, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

SRP ArchivingEdit

Hello. Is it possible to archive the done entries a lot sooner than the other ones? It's a pain to scroll back though the list just to find ones that are not done yet. Would every 3 or 6 hours be possible? Also it would help with SRG looking like a huge backlog also. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:15, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello @AmandaNP: Yes it is possible, on Monday the bot will start archiving the done entries every 3 hours. regards.--جار الله (talk) 17:09, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Does this apply only to SRP or to SRG as well? As someone who responds to steward comments and closures there relatively often (and also sleeps for more than three hours), I'd rather not have the archiving period that short. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
17:13, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
@AmandaNP and 1234qwer1234qwer4: how about archiving the done entries every 6 hours?--جار الله (talk) 13:38, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
6 hours doesn't make a difference to me. I was only worried about the done ones, the other ones can wait, but if we have to do it together, then 6 hrs is absolutely fine. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 20:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
@AmandaNP Are you talking about "done ones" as an opposite to other closed (not done, redundant, locally handled etc.) requests? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
20:29, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
That's correct. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 21:00, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
I find that the requests closed with results other than "done" should ideally stay a bit longer, but if there is no technical way to do that, I would not object to archiving everything after six hours. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
11:56, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Did you increase the archiving period again by chance? It seems that SRG has not been being archived very frequently lately. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
19:39, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
@1234qwer1234qwer4: No, I think there are some problems I'll check it out and fix it. Best.--جار الله (talk) 15:17, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

SRG archivingEdit

Jarbot seems to have died on Steward Request/Global - there are so many templates on the page that the last few templates can't render. Would you be able to kickstart it? Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:51, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello @Jon Kolbert: I have troubles to editing from my PC to fix the script because of the "error" ("You have been blocked from editing.") can you give the bot local ‏ipblock-exempt right because it seems that the global ipblock-exempt doesn't work here. Thanks.--جار الله (talk) 08:46, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
  Done Thanks :) Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:48, 15 October 2021 (UTC)


Hi. What is Steward requests/Global/2021-w41? If it is intended, please fix the header. -- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 17:57, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Jeff G.: please take a look at this talk page Stewards' noticeboard. Best.--جار الله (talk) 22:25, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

redundant reportsEdit

Hello, as @-revi pointed out here, it appears that the bot doesn't archive reports marked as redundant. Could you maybe make the bot archive "redundant" in the same way as "notdone"? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
08:51, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello @1234qwer1234qwer4: I will add "redundant" mark as well. Best.--جار الله (talk) 11:10, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
11:11, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Steward requests/Global#Global lock for MaurineEberly has not been archived for quite a while; is that related to the status being set to "+"? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
10:27, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
Another issue appears to be with requests handled with {{status|1=...; looks like the bot fails to identify them as handled too. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
11:41, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

4 identical sectionsEdit

Hi, it seems that your bot archived this section four times in a row before finally removing it from SRGP an hour later. Please fix that. Thanks in advance. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh Name me 17:27, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Maybe (?) related to #JarBot bug? above? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
17:28, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi @NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh and 1234qwer1234qwer4: I'll check it out. Thanks.--جار الله (talk) 03:30, 4 December 2021 (UTC)


@جار الله: your bot archived request for extension of admin mni@Wikipedia but it is not updated at Mangang (talk) 08:15, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Steward requests/GlobalEdit

Hi, there is a problem with archives, with archives with week there is no week 0 of 2022, and if set header to be 0, there would be an error. So, could you fix this and merge 2022-w00 to 2021-w52 (by ISO week system)? Thingofme (talk) 08:15, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

I also agree that these discussions should not be on the Steward requests/Global/2022-w00 page and instead should be moved to 2021-w52. The page looks a bit of a mess already given by, having a look at the signature dates, some of them are dated back as far as November 2021 and the discussions are not in chronological order. Iggy the Swan (talk) 11:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
This is discussions archived in week 52 of 2021, means that by ISO week date, it's from 27 December 2021 to 2 January 2022. As weeks are different than years, weeks are also handled by the ISO system and the new year doesn't begin in Monday, so the 2021 page is archived for 2 first days of 2022. We have to manage archiving by weeks because it's too long to archive by months. Note: When the bots complete archiving, I will merge two archives and delete the w00. If the problem arises in 2023 I will report it. Thingofme (talk) 14:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your notice @Iggy the Swan@Thingofme I will work on that in next few days. Best. جار الله (talk) 20:17, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi @Thingofme please merge the two archives and delete the w00. Thanks. جار الله (talk) 19:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
@جار الله I can't do this as I can't edit archive, please do this for me. Thingofme (talk) 01:54, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
@Thingofme Done. Best. جار الله (talk) 02:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)


Hello جار الله. It looks like JarBot is not archiving SRP anymore. Could you please take a look and see if there's any error? Thanks in advance. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:16, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello @MarcoAurelio thanks for noticing the bot back to work properly. Best regards, جار الله (talk) 19:15, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you! Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:16, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Apply to join the Leadership Development Working Group!Edit

(Read this message in other languages on Meta-wiki: ‎العربية • Русский •日本語 • 한국어)


This is a friendly reminder the Community Development team at the Wikimedia Foundation is supporting the creation of a global, community-driven Leadership Development Working Group. The purpose of the working group is to advise leadership development work. Feedback was collected in February 2022 and a summary of the feedback is on Meta-wiki. The application period to join the Working Group is now open and is closing soon on April 10, 2022. Please review the information about the working group, share with community members who might be interested, and apply if you are interested.

Thank you,

The Community Development team Cassie Casares (talk) 00:48, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Wikimania Session Alert!Edit

Come listen to the members of the leadership development working group share updates about their work, goals and vision at Wikimania 2022: The Festival Edition! Learn how you can get involved with their efforts to create a shared leadership definition for the Wiki movement!

Panel Session:

Leadership Development Working Group: What are we doing and why?

Saturday 13th August

8.45am - 9.30am UTC

Bring your questions! Cassie Casares (talk) 22:55, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

طلب مراجعة: نحو تعريفٍ مشتركٍ للقيادةEdit

طويل جدًا؛ لم أقرأه: أصبحت مسودة تعريف القيادة التي خطتها مجموعة عمل تطوير القيادات جاهزةً لمراجعة المجتمع وإبداء الرأي حولها.

فضلًا، شاركونا مراجعاتكم وآرائكم على صفحة نقاش المجموعة على الميتا أو على نموذج جوجل لجمع المراجعات أو على منتدى استراتيجية الحركة ويمكنكم أيضًا مراسلتنا مباشرةً على بريدنا الإلكتروني ننتظر تعليقاتكم حتى 6 أكتوبر 2022.


نتمنى أن تكونوا على اطلاعٍ حول دأب مجموعة عمل تطوير القيادات على مدار الشهور القليلة الماضية لتشكيل وبناء القيادة في حركتنا. تتكون مجموعتنا هذه من متطوعين ويكيميدين ممثلين لشتى المجتمعات واللغات والأدوار والخبرات. ويسعدنا أن نعلن للمجتمع أن مسودة تعريف القيادة جاهزةٌ الآن لمراجعات المجتمع وملاحظاته. جاءت هذه المسودة بعد شهورٍ من النقاشات والتعلُّم ومشاركة الآراء والتجارب المختلفة لمجتمعاتنا. يحمل هذا التعريف بين طياته الخصائص المميزة لحركة ويكيميديا بما فيها من تنوع وتميز.

تتضمن مسودة التعريف تعريفًا عامًا للقيادة ومؤهلات القيادة الجيدة من أفعال وصفات ونتائج، ونرجو الاطلاع على التعريف وإعلامنا بآرائكم حوله حتى تاريخ 6 أكتوبر 2022.

يمكنكم التعبير عن آرائكم وأفكاركم واقتراحاتكم وتعليقاتكم عبر صفحة نقاش الميتا أو نموذج المراجعة أو منتدى استراتيجية الحركة. يمكنك أيضًا مراسلتنا عبر البريد الإلكتروني مباشرة على

يمكنكم التحقق مما إذا كان التعريف العام والفئات الفرعية تتماشى مع فكرتكم عن القيادة في الحركة. يمكنكم أيضًا محاولة العثور على الفجوات في التعريف، ربما بعض صفات القيادة أو أي شيء آخر مفقود في مسودة التعريف أو يمكنك التحقق مما إذا كان التعريف يراعي جميع الاعتبارات الثقافية واللغوية والمجتمعية وغيرها من مختلف اعتبارات الحركة وشاركوا هذه الأفكار معنا.

لنحتفي سويًا بالقيادة المتنوعة والمميزة في الحركة.

تحياتي. Nada kareem22 (talk) 20:21, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Coolest Tool Award - 2022Edit

Hello Jarallah, I've sent you an email regarding our review of Jarbot. Kindly take a look and respond. SSapaty (WMF) (talk) 18:07, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

@SSapaty (WMF) Hello Komla, I have replied to your email. Best. جار الله (talk) 19:24, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you SSapaty (WMF) (talk) 23:03, 11 November 2022 (UTC)