User language
en-N This user has a native understanding of English.
fr-1 Cet utilisateur dispose de connaissances de base en français.
Users by language

To do tasksEdit

Align the codes on the admin/crat/cu/... and sisters user templates to have a base, and a build

user meta tool to identify User:CommonsDelinker pages and removeEdit

Time to get rid of the legacy garbage user pages, and allow meta user page to shine through.

Cf. kywiktionaryEdit

Has this report lead to any further conclusions? It seems this IP user resumed activity after expiry of your 1 month block. --Vogone (talk) 16:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

@Vogone: Thanks for the contact, I had forgotten to get back there following the block expiry. There was no contact, which is unfortunate. I have been and tidied up, and blocked for an extended period. I also note, and think that it may be related, though will watch more closely.

I also see a little activity at tgwikt from one of the IPs which is probably related.  — billinghurst sDrewth 20:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

I see you blocked 2804:14C:6585:429A:E9B4:A405:E5FF:F8C0 on that wiki, but have not deleted (all of?) their recent contributions — specifically the ones from March 10th, which I'm pretty sure are the exact entries that caused the wiki to pass 30K again on that date (I announced it with no "reservations" because I forgot I had just questioned similar activity in that same wiki just the month before [as linked to by Vogone above]). Any particular reason you left those pages alone? - dcljr (talk) 02:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Same goes for the following users on the same wiki:
These 5 IPs have been blocked as part of your March 24th block of "2804:14c:6590:8cec::/64" but their contributions from early January of this year have been left on the wiki. Have I just "jumped the gun" on this, and you're still in the process of deleting stuff over there? Or are you not sure they're actually the same person? - dcljr (talk) 02:33, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Mass delete failed due to db error, and I didn't have the time to do singly. The older are not in RC, so cannot be mass deleted.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
OK. So, should I request this at SRM? (You would have deleted those pages if you could have, right?) - dcljr (talk) 06:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
They are deletions that are going to need to be bot'ified or handled individually, which takes a little time and patience. These are shared tasks, so either at SRM, or a link to list at SRM are always an option.  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:38, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Range watchesEdit

You have marked unresolved affair as resolvedEdit

Hi Billinghurst! Please, can you clarify to me according to which facts you have considered that the topic in Wikimedia_Forum#5th_Official_request_for_correction_of_false_and_libelous_information_about_Michal_Matúšov_in_the_Annual_report_2018_of_WMSVK is resolved? The pages in Meta and in the website of WUG WMSVK are still containing false, defamatory information about myself. I myself see no signs of resolution. Do you? --KuboF Hromoslav (talk) 16:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

@KuboF Hromoslav: You raised the issue to get the attention of WMF and they have responded, that is the only realistic resolution that can take place in that forum in any means. What else can take place in the discussion forum Wikimedia Forum? If you have any issues for Metawiki, then please take them through the processes in place at metawiki, these exist and you can be guided through those by that community.  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:36, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, billinghurst! While I came in order for a specific action to be performed (not to express my frustration) and that action wasn't performed, your arguments make sense. Thank you! --KuboF Hromoslav (talk) 16:27, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #461Edit

Infostrada on it.wikiEdit

Hello, I noticed your removal of part of the above article as "supposed spam". This note just to inform you that the part of information removed was not spam but just reporting a commercial rebranding due to the fact that "Infostrada" is full part of Wind-3 telecom group and starting from a precise date, the name "Infostrada" simply disappear. Removing that information (that is the plain reporting of a key episode in the company's/brand's life) would result in a kind of misleading information, inducing the reader to think that that name and logo are still alive (they aren't anymore since several years now). I understand that you could have considered it as "spam" due to the sourcing editor, but this was one of the (rare) case where it was not. --L736El'adminalcolico 16:31, 31 mar 2021 (CEST)

Wikidata weekly summary #462Edit


Hello Billinghurst, thanks for deleting the garbage and protecting the talk page! Much appreciated. Best regards, Bédévore (talk) 00:08, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Bédévore 👍👍👍 No problems, after my initial goof. I have also added it to AF/181 similarly to your dominant account.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Additionally, it is one of the filters that when triggers I have the bot ping me when I am sitting in IRC.  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:13, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #463Edit