User language
en-N This user has a native understanding of English.
fr-1 Cet utilisateur dispose de connaissances de base en français.
Users by language

To do tasksEdit

Align the codes on the admin/crat/cu/... and sisters user templates to have a base, and a build

user meta tool to identify User:CommonsDelinker pages and removeEdit

Time to get rid of the legacy garbage user pages, and allow meta user page to shine through.

Cf. kywiktionaryEdit

Has this report lead to any further conclusions? It seems this IP user resumed activity after expiry of your 1 month block. --Vogone (talk) 16:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

@Vogone: Thanks for the contact, I had forgotten to get back there following the block expiry. There was no contact, which is unfortunate. I have been and tidied up, and blocked for an extended period. I also note, and think that it may be related, though will watch more closely.

I also see a little activity at tgwikt from one of the IPs which is probably related.  — billinghurst sDrewth 20:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

I see you blocked 2804:14C:6585:429A:E9B4:A405:E5FF:F8C0 on that wiki, but have not deleted (all of?) their recent contributions — specifically the ones from March 10th, which I'm pretty sure are the exact entries that caused the wiki to pass 30K again on that date (I announced it with no "reservations" because I forgot I had just questioned similar activity in that same wiki just the month before [as linked to by Vogone above]). Any particular reason you left those pages alone? - dcljr (talk) 02:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Same goes for the following users on the same wiki:
These 5 IPs have been blocked as part of your March 24th block of "2804:14c:6590:8cec::/64" but their contributions from early January of this year have been left on the wiki. Have I just "jumped the gun" on this, and you're still in the process of deleting stuff over there? Or are you not sure they're actually the same person? - dcljr (talk) 02:33, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Mass delete failed due to db error, and I didn't have the time to do singly. The older are not in RC, so cannot be mass deleted.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
OK. So, should I request this at SRM? (You would have deleted those pages if you could have, right?) - dcljr (talk) 06:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
They are deletions that are going to need to be bot'ified or handled individually, which takes a little time and patience. These are shared tasks, so either at SRM, or a link to list at SRM are always an option.  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:38, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Range watchesEdit

Request for filter helpEdit

Hello, Billinghurst, and Happy New Year!

We could use help with Filter 22 at Wikivoyage. Please have a look here, and also share any thoughts you have in the comments.

Thanks so much!

Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:35, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: If you are in freenode's IRC, then we can talk. What issue are you having? Can you point me to some posts that are getting through and they have not been deleted? Specific pages? Specific namespaces? Or is this fellow just doing shotgun tactics?  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:42, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: I have refactored to make additions easier and manipulable if you want to flick them b/w ns. It picked up for earlier edits, though I don't know what I am looking, or variations they make, eg. case change, spaces,
@MusikAnimal: For en.wikivoyage can you please set up your filter activity checking functionality, similar that you did for enWS. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:24, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Here's an example of a post that got through. This fellow has some predictable patterns but also will just attack most anyplace without any particular reason. I haven't been on IRC. We can discuss specifics more in the response thread for the filter. Thanks very much for your help! Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:24, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: Yes, I saw that, please go to voy:enSpecial:AbuseFilter/examine/5226614 import filter 22 and test on the IP address as editor, and you will see success. I also had success on three other IP edits on that same filter. With these sorts of vandals, at enWS, and here at meta, we got the ability to block an account introduced, and I have craft filters to put a two hour block on the vandals, which has been really useful. One does need to drive out the false positives first prior to introducing that strategy.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Let's keep in touch. One of my fellow en.voy admins who's more technically knowledgeable than I is concerned about the possibility of false positives. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:43, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
One should always be concerned about false positives. That said, I have been doing this for some years now, and I try to keep it simple. There are numbers of other measures though without seeing the extent of the vandalism, one cannot tell.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:44, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #449Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #450Edit

Wikidata weekly summary #451Edit

Please unblock itEdit

please open the block on my wikipedia page, bro, please check it there I only want to see the contribution of users, that's just it, please check

--Duta [ 2000 ] 12:32, 19 January 2021 (UTC)