Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat

(Redirected from Meta:RfH)
Latest comment: 4 minutes ago by MathXplore in topic Report concerning User:69.18.14.67
Shortcut:
WM:RFH
Meta-Wiki has a small active community. When a normal user requires the assistance of an administrator or bureaucrat for some particular task, it is not always easy to find one. This page helps users find one when they need one; asking specific admins directly via their talk pages is one way to elicit a fast response. It is only for assistance required at Meta-Wiki, help for other wikis needs to be requested at those wikis.

See also: Stewards' noticeboard, Access to nonpublic personal data policy noticeboard, Category:Meta-Wiki policies, Category:Global policies

Meta-Wiki maintenance announcements [edit]
General maintenance announcements:
(as of 29 December 2024)

Discussions:
(as of 29 December 2024)
(Last updated: 2023-11-09)
Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Please find answered requests in the archives (this month).

SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day and sections whose most recent comment is older than 10 days.

Proposal to apply some of my suggestions to some abuse filters

edit

There are two cases of some identical abuse filters, some of which I would like to propose my suggestions for them:

  • The spambot filters are identical, but filter 104 should also disallow spambot accounts to allow anti-vandalism patrollers to report them more easily, and 164 should either be disabled or even deleted (what's the added benefit of using a private filter to only disallow registered spambots?):
  • Special:AbuseFilter/104
  • Special:AbuseFilter/164

Also, for 104 we should opt-out Meta itself using wiki_name != "metawiki" because private filter 121 blocks the spambots locally. Thank you. Codename Noreste (talk) 00:18, 23 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

I had a quick look at these filters. It seems like these filters were more or less independently developed and later converged more towards one another (with the most significant difference that filter 104 also matches IPs). The notes of filter 164 already mention a potential merge with filter 104 when temporary accounts are launched. I'll ping @XXBlackburnXx and SHB2000: since they were the last ones to work on the concerning filters. Concerning the user page filters, I see more pronounced differences (for example in the criteria used to identify edits & how it deals with redirects...). Filter 362 is more refined in that respect. I'll give an additional ping to colleage @Billinghurst: since he is more familiar with the latter filters. Daniuu (talk) 20:03, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
I kept 104 and 164 separated back in May, for 2 key reasons: 1) 104 has always targeted IP edits, and I was concerned about potentially breaking someone’s script (if there existed one) by making a sudden change. 2) Separating them makes it easier to distinguish between registered accounts and IP edits, which could simplify the stewards’ work, though I don’t know if that’s the case these days, since pretty much everything gets reported to SRG anyway.
That said, I’m not opposed to merging them. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 20:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, agreed – though I'll probably defer to you three since you know way more about the specific nuances than I do. --SHB2000 (tc) 22:01, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
I, as a non-admin, can also help as well. Codename Noreste (talk) 02:57, 28 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Request for patrolled right for Jet Pilot

edit

Hello! I would like to request the patroller right. Of my 144 edits here, many involve reverting vandalism and making requests for speedy deletion. I also regularly submit requests through GSR. As an active SWMT member, I use SWViewer on a daily basis to revert cross-wiki vandalism. Additionally, I have experience with the rollback right on both eswiki and enwiki, which has helped me handle vandalism effectively in larger communities. I have read and understood the responsibilities outlined in Meta:Patrollers, and I am committed to using this flag responsibly at all times. I am also already autopatrolled here on Meta. Please feel free to ask me any questions. Regards, Jet Pilot (talk) 19:12, 28 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done since reverts look fine, and I see no other apparent issues. EPIC (talk) 21:30, 28 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. EPIC (talk) 21:30, 28 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism on translation page

edit

Please revert this, since I can't directly edit translation pages, and removing it manually via the translation interface doesn't work. JJPMaster (she/they) 04:51, 29 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done by JJMC. --SHB2000 (tc) 05:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. SHB2000 (tc) 05:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Report concerning User:GYATTSLAPPER613

edit

GYATTSLAPPER613 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA)Reasons: Vandalism XReport --Leonidlednev (talk) 07:13, 29 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done by XXB. --SHB2000 (tc) 07:27, 29 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. SHB2000 (tc) 07:27, 29 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Report concerning User:88.93.70.44

edit

88.93.70.44 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA)Reasons: Vandalism XReport --نوفاك اتشمان (talk) 16:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 16:55, 29 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 16:56, 29 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Report concerning User:69.18.14.67

edit

69.18.14.67 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • GUC • CA)Reasons: Vandalism XReport --MathXplore (talk) 23:30, 29 December 2024 (UTC)Reply