User talk:ZI Jony

Welcome to Meta!

Hello, ZI Jony. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum if you need help with something (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!

 — billinghurst sDrewth 00:25, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

অনুবাদ

শুভেচ্ছা নিবেন, বাংলায় অনুবাদের জন্য ধন্যবাদ জানাই তবে আপনার অনুবাদ এখনো বেশ যান্ত্রিক। আমার পক্ষে আপনার সব বাংলা অনুবাদ পর্যালোচনা করা সম্ভব নয়, তাই অনুবাদে আরো যত্নশীল হবেন। আমার অনুরোধ রইল, কোন কিছু অনুবাদ করার পর সেটি আপনি নিজে আবার পড়ে দেখবেন, আপনি নিজে পড়ে সন্তুষ্ট হলে বুঝবেন অনুবাদ ঠিক হয়েছে। আর আপনি নিজেই পড়ে না বুঝলে, বুঝবেন অনুবাদ ঠিক নেই। --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:00, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

The Affiliate-selected Board seats process welcomes your support

Hello. You are receiving this message because you are active in the field of translations <3 The movement needs you! The Nominations phase has started for the ongoing selection process of two Board members, and the timeline is quite tight.

A Translation Central is available to help translators figure out what's been covered and what's left to do. Over the course of the next few weeks, your attention on candidates' profiles is particularly welcome.

While there are four languages that are especially relevant for multiple affiliates (namely Arabic, French, Russian and Spanish), we are asking your help for Chinese, Ukrainian, Bengali, Czech, Hungarian, Romanian, Italian, Korean, Portuguese, Polish, Farsi, German, Cantonese, Finnish, Hindi, Thai, Dutch, and Greek, as these also matter to affiliates! If you can't help: please see if you know anyone in your circle who could, and spread the word :) Thank you! Elitre (WMF) and Facilitators of ASBS 2019, 21:35, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Yilan

I am trying to do some foundational work on the Hokkien/Min Nan Wiktionary in the area of geography that is directly related to the Hokkien language ([1]). I added these same English language terms on the Mandarin Chinese Wiktionary the other day ([2]). My work on the Mandarin Chinese Wiktionary was accepted and modified by the community there. I'm glad you are watching the small wikis, but don't you think it's going a little far to say that the edits I made are not adding useful information? Thanks for any help. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 08:51, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Let me know what you are thinking on this issue. I would like to continue the work as soon as possible, but I don't want to do it with a 'delete' hanging over my head. Thanks for any help on this. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 09:33, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

@Geographyinitiative: Please read guidance and policies, when your making new uncompleted article please add Pang-bô͘:under construction top of the page. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 14:18, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

ZI Jony, your actions relating to this page creation confuse me. I'm removimg the deletion template as they are useful edits. I don't believe your tag or your response here was helpful. Vermont (talk) 20:08, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Edits to Steward requests/Username changes

I highly suggest you don't try clerking Steward requests/Username changes again. You do not have the authority to mark requests and this edit clearly shows you have no idea what you are doing. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 23:20, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks k6ka, I've noted that after my second edit and that was reverted itself. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 03:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Hey Zony, these notification are also posted by renamer handling the request, so that user don't get confused in case they want to objects to usurption. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 06:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

1997kB noted. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 06:51, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Dutch Wikibook: Basiskennis chemie

Hi, I saw you reverting a few of my edits in de Dutch wikibook on Basiskennis chemie. I wonder why you did so, as de edits were in interwiki links. I changed the English link to a Dutch one, in my opinion perfectly well in a Dutch book. So I am curious why you made the edit? [[3]]. T.vanschaik (talk) 11:26, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

@T.vanschaik: please use edit summry, I think It was constructive edit. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 08:49, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

This is what I get out of the edit history.

huidig vorige 24 okt 2019 19:58‎ ZI Jony overleg bijdragen‎ k 8.408 bytes -301‎ Undid edits by T.vanschaik (talk) to last version by 78.22.30.240 ongedaan maken|bedanken Labels: Ongedaan maken SWViewer [1.3]

It does not tell me anything about the reason why for the edit. Sorry, I reverted the links again to the Dutch Wikipedia. T.vanschaik (talk) 19:49, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Its ok. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 19:56, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Erm...I'm not certain as to whether I interpreted your reply correctly, but am I correct in postulating that your comment insinuates your revert of their revision to be primarily influenced by the fact it did not include an edit summary, and therefore your revert was constructive? I find issue with your lack of recognition that you are the one at fault here; the revert stepped far outside normal practices. The subject was an active contributor on a project for which you do not understand the language and, to me, the edit easily gives the impression of being constructive (and is so), which you reverted in under a minute after it was made. I do hope for this situation to be rectified and to ensure such issues do not reoccur in the future. Regards, Vermont (talk) 23:40, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Vermont Thank you for your comment here and well noted. Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 16:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)