Find an impartial steward to review
Hello.
Can you please find an impartial steward to look at this high-handed stuff? I am not interested in reverting Trijnstel, only in public finding that there were no grounds for the action (except for hostility from certain group of people to my person).
I extensively interacted—in good or evil mode—with Trijnstel, علاء, Vituzzu, Ruslik0, -revi, Jon_Kolbert, DerHexer, Green_Giant, and Masti, hence neither of those is eligible. I also had some intersection with Tegel, Stryn, Matiia, Rxy, MarcoAurelio, and Bsadowski1, hence these should have lower priority. For an unrelated reason I may not ask on #wikimedia-stewards. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:24, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, Incnis Mrsi, I'm not sure who would be the best to talk to individually. I would typically advise you to email stewards
wikimedia.org and if you don't get a response follow-up directly with a steward to see the status. User:QuiteUnusual doesn't appear to be on your list and is usually quite straightforward, so he may be able to give you further advice. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:15, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'm always happy to look at requests like this. Incnis Mrsi, let me know on my talk page if you want me to investigate further and comment. QuiteUnusual (talk) 15:38, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
cu request
Hi, for some reason i'm writing here, not on enwiki, hope it's ok. I believe "en:User:Khondoker Jobair"/"en:User:Great Hero32" is evading his block on enwiki. "en:User:Kryptonian Sapiens" is their new account. Editing pattern of "User:Kryptonian Sapiens" is very similar to "User:Great Hero32". "User:Kryptonian Sapiens" is creating same article "User:Great Hero32" created on bnwiki, since User:Great Hero32 is blocked on enwiki, he created this new account to edit on enwiki. Could you please check & make sure no evading of block going on here. Thanks. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 22:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, আফতাবুজ্জামান. I don't mind you contacting me on meta. That SPI is stale so I can't positively confirm, but the account shares three ranges with the previous socks and has a similar focus. I have blocked on en.wiki on behaviour plus the overlap on the historical ranges. No obvious sleepers. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:33, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Check your email
I am unable to edit my enwiki talk page nor send email thru enwiki, so I've sent you and Bradv some email thru here regarding my w:WP:ROPE unblock request at enwiki. Hope this clears things up. ミラP 20:50, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- I did. I said I’m no longer concerned about it. I don’t personally think you should be unblocked, because I think ROPE is factually incorrect on how en.wiki’s unblock process works, but I said I don’t mind Deepfriendokra using their judgement. Namely: I’m not convinced by your UTRS appeal so won’t be unblocking myself, but if someone else is, no concerns from me. Also, please don’t contact me about en.wiki matters on my meta talk page. I use it for cross wiki stuff. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Account renaming
Hi Tony. Can you please help me in renaming my other account User:AlbanGeller to User:Neveselbert (mobile) per en:WP:SOCK#NOTIFY? Thanks. Neveselbert (talk) 06:13, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Tony. In light of this material change, do you think this might be enough reason to reinstate TPA on Wikipedia? Neveselbert (talk) 07:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
- That is best handled through UTRS. I’ve given my permission as a CU for any admin to review the block, but otherwise don’t have an opinion. TonyBallioni (talk) 07:48, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
- I see, although can you please clarify whether it was right for an involved admin to decline my appeal in (please correct me if I've misunderstood) contravention of en:WP:APPEAL#What happens next (any uninvolved (independent) administrator will make a decision.)? Neveselbert (talk) 08:01, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
- I don’t think NRP was involved. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:09, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
- He was involved by declining my first appeal in 2019. (He later revoked my TPA on Christmas Day.) Neveselbert (talk) 16:12, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
- I don’t think NRP was involved. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:09, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
- I see, although can you please clarify whether it was right for an involved admin to decline my appeal in (please correct me if I've misunderstood) contravention of en:WP:APPEAL#What happens next (any uninvolved (independent) administrator will make a decision.)? Neveselbert (talk) 08:01, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
- That is best handled through UTRS. I’ve given my permission as a CU for any admin to review the block, but otherwise don’t have an opinion. TonyBallioni (talk) 07:48, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
┌─────────────────────────────────┘
Don’t really think that makes him involved. Anyway, like I said. UTRS is the way to go now. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:14, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
- Would it be OK if you allowed me to undergo the en:Template:2nd chance process in the meantime? Neveselbert (talk) 10:05, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- (On the UTRS front, my appeal has yet to be reviewed by a CheckUser and it's been almost a week.) Neveselbert (talk) 15:48, 21 June 2020 (UTC)