AF181Edit

I was thinking that I could add you to the filter to stop some of the xwiki BS. Not exactly certain how much hassle across wikis, so thought that I should float it first.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:04, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

@Billinghurst Haven't noticed any xwiki yet. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:37, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

CommonsEdit

Hello there! Could you review my unblock request since I've never said what Ymblanter accused me of? I would really appreciate. Александр Мотин (talk) 14:00, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Requests for comment/Global ban for Александр МотинEdit

Hi. I'm a Wikipedia user since 2010, has 1,7 million edits (including my bots' edits) and bot flag in 10 Wikipedias. Can I re-open this request? MBH (talk) 02:01, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

@MBH Please create a new one, and make sure to notify local communities. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:16, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
But why I need to create a new one, if I agree with current statement? If an original poster not honored enough to create a global ban proposals, I can support his statement. MBH (talk) 11:33, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
@MBH Normally I'd agree along the lines of w:WP:NOTBUREAU, but global bans are one of the places where we have to make sure that T's are crossed and I's are dotted. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:39, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Requests for comment/Global ban of BFDIFan707 and HeraldristEdit

Hello, there are two failed requests to implementing a global ban for BFDIFan707 and Heraldrist, and their socks. This two accounts will be a sockpuppet, and will be globally banned by the community, and the Wikimedia Foundation. This request is called Requests for comment/Global ban for BFDIFan707 and Heraldrist. Can you re-open this request? 180.214.233.29 02:31, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

No. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:32, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Yes. 180.214.233.29 02:35, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
But why you need to create a new one, if you agree with current statement? If an original poster not honored enough to create a global ban proposals, you can support his statement. 116.206.28.22 14:20, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Please can you request it? AntiCompositeNumber? It has may involved on cross-wiki abuse. 180.214.233.67 01:51, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
I'm not going to open it, because then I wouldn't be able to close it. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:03, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Can you open it, it will be closed by Daniuu, not by AntiCompositeNumber. This cowboy's running from myself (talk) 14:49, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Daniuu is not a steward, and can not close global ban RfCs as successful. Please stop asking me about this, the answer is and will remain no. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:34, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Can you open it, it will be closed by AmandaNP, not by Daniuu, the answer is and will remain yes, and AmandaNP is a steward. This cowboy's running from myself (talk) 07:13, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Please, can you open it, AntiCompositeNumber? It will be closed by AmandaNP. Heraldrybranding (talk) 08:54, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

A few moreEdit

Hi.

Thanks again for quick reaction. Here a few more of they accounts. This user periodically evasion the block and inserts numerous inappropriate original research, and has now reached the level of cross-wiki vandalism. Thank you. Mykola 20:46, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Kakamata-realEdit

Thanks for your prompt action on Kakamata-real (talk · contribs). I really appreciate that. Thank you. Kacamata (talk) 04:17, 22 November 2022 (UTC)