Super Wang
Blocked edit
|
You have been blocked from editing Meta for one day due to trolling at Steward requests/Checkuser. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, and privacy violations are considered vandalism, and will not be tolerated. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. If you believe the block was placed in error, you may place an unblock request on your talk page using {{unblock|reasons for unblock here}}. Unblock tools: block log • gblock log • blocklist • stalktoy • guc • unblock • remove gblock • contribs: +/-
|
Unblock request edit
|
Unblock request declined
This blocked user has had their unblock request reviewed by one or more administrators, who has/have reviewed and declined this request. Request reason: I want someone to explain something. Trolling? Can you check again my comments at SRCU for me to prove me innocent? I didn't look down upon anyone and wasn't inurbane towards Revi just because he doesn't understand Chinese, (and he might asked for too much as a result of being a "senior", from telling zh.wiki users to add local discussion summaries to whatever), but he thought I had been sarcastic. Or is it trolling to just point out Revi's spelling mistake? Block ID: #138276. Decline reason: Procedural decline since block was expired. — regards, Revi 15:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC) বাংলা | English | español | français | magyar | italiano | 한국어 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | українська | 中文 | edit |
- I am willing to unblock provided that you refrain from adding unhelpful remarks in the future. This is trolling, as is this and this other. Calling users "pathetic" is unnaceptable. In normal circumnstances I'd have warned you, but you were already. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 13:31, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- You are generous. I was thinking of "don't be a dick" as an appropriate response, and saying wait out your day. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:40, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Billinghurst: I thought "Don't be a ****" was not a policy that everyone must comply with, as you can see {{essay}} on top of that page. Calling others "jerk" or "dick" is not urbane either, so what's the difference between you and me?
- @MarcoAurelio: If you'd unblock I'll not be adding any comment on SRCU in the future, no matter useful or not, for I was hurt badly from some offense by Revi and more in the past. Is that cool? I would never be commenting on SRCU and never archive this block/unblock template, which reminds me of certain people's nature. And I will never forgive them.
- If you're clear with what I stated, please consider lifting the ban.
- --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 14:02, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Super Wang, I think nobody here is asking you to stop contributing to SRCU or any other pages, and that only the tone of some of your edits are being pointed out as problematic like I've said above. As for this thread, if you want to archive it, be my guest. It's your talk page after all and there's a page history that interested people can look at if they're interested. No comments on your last point about never forgive some people. I am no one to tell people how they should feel and/or belive. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:49, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- @MarcoAurelio: Well, some users might take my several edits as pronlematic, and I'm trying not to be problematic to satisfy them. Now what about unblocking? I think I need to post in SRP for zh.voy is expecting a new sysop this morning (UTC+8) and I'm responsible for asking stewards to enable the flag for the candidate. --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 23:37, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- And yeah, I may, of course, leave it to Cohaf or someone else. But it's completely up to you whether I'm unblocked. --Super Wang on zhwiki (Share your opinions) 23:40, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Your block expires in a little over 12 hours. It won't make much of a difference at SRP. Vermont (talk) 00:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- Super Wang, I think nobody here is asking you to stop contributing to SRCU or any other pages, and that only the tone of some of your edits are being pointed out as problematic like I've said above. As for this thread, if you want to archive it, be my guest. It's your talk page after all and there's a page history that interested people can look at if they're interested. No comments on your last point about never forgive some people. I am no one to tell people how they should feel and/or belive. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:49, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- You are generous. I was thinking of "don't be a dick" as an appropriate response, and saying wait out your day. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:40, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
The 2021 Community Wishlist Survey is now open! This survey is the process where communities decide what the Community Tech team should work on over the next year. We encourage everyone to submit proposals until the deadline on 30 November, or comment on other proposals to help make them better. The communities will vote on the proposals between 8 December and 21 December.
The Community Tech team is focused on tools for experienced Wikimedia editors. You can write proposals in any language, and we will translate them for you. Thank you, and we look forward to seeing your proposals!
18:26, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
We invite all registered users to vote on the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey. You can vote from now until 21 December for as many different wishes as you want.
In the Survey, wishes for new and improved tools for experienced editors are collected. After the voting, we will do our best to grant your wishes. We will start with the most popular ones.
We, the Community Tech, are one of the Wikimedia Foundation teams. We create and improve editing and wiki moderation tools. What we work on is decided based on results of the Community Wishlist Survey. Once a year, you can submit wishes. After two weeks, you can vote on the ones that you're most interested in. Next, we choose wishes from the survey to work on. Some of the wishes may be granted by volunteer developers or other teams.
We are waiting for your votes. Thank you!
16:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
My steward statement edit
I saw that you translated 我在SRG做出了2万4千多次编辑 - I didn't feel confident translating the whole thing, and I don't want to change your translation since you signed it, but shouldn't this be 我在SRG做出了2千4百多次编辑 to correspond to the "over 2400" in English? Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 10:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: Thanks for letting me know. Yes, I was too tired and messed up numbers -- I always messed them! I must apologize. Now I have corrected it. Wish you elected! --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 10:37, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: And I didn't mean to unveil your private information, just want to make sure vandals would be blocked as soon as they vandalize. Please don't take it too seriously. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 10:40, 23 January 2021 (UTC)