Open main menu

Tech ambassadors, "take two"Edit

Hello tech ambassador! This month has seen a good influx of new faces in this crew \o/ , so it is time to reactivate our conversations. Now that we have a pretty good coverage of so many different projects, here are some topics for your consideration.

  1. Are there further thoughts on the role itself? I hope the questions available on Meta can help spark them. Please weigh in at Talk:Tech/Ambassadors/List#Tech ambassadors, take 2.
  2. How about we try and organise future collective work in a Phabricator workboard? Talk:Tech/Ambassadors/List#A Phab workboard for us? has all the details to explore this proposal.
  3. Finally, you are also welcome to comment at, should you happen to have suggestions for the Community Liaisons team, currently wondering how to measure "Wiki projects requesting beta features and other early deployments".

We hope to be able to host a live discussion in early 2018; until then, we're looking forward to hearing from you on Meta! All the best, --Elitre (WMF) (talk), on behalf of the Community Liaisons

Need Help !For creating babel in Meetei MayekEdit

Can  you please help in making babel

Information are here

  • mni 0 ꯃꯁꯤ ꯁꯤꯖꯤꯟꯅꯔꯤꯕ ꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏ ꯑꯁꯤ ꯃꯤꯇꯩꯂꯣꯟ ꯀꯔꯤꯁꯨ ꯈꯪꯕ ꯉꯝꯗꯦ ꯫
  • mni 1 ꯃꯁꯤ ꯁꯤꯖꯤꯟꯅꯔꯤꯕ ꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏ ꯑꯁꯤꯅ ꯃꯤꯇꯩꯂꯣꯟ ꯁꯤ ꯑꯔꯥꯏꯕ ꯋꯥꯍꯪ ꯅꯠꯇꯔꯒ ꯑꯆꯝꯕ ꯑꯌꯤꯕ ꯄꯣꯠꯁꯛꯇꯤ ꯈꯪꯕ ꯉꯝꯃꯤ ꯫
  • mni 2 ꯃꯁꯤ ꯁꯤꯖꯤꯟꯅꯔꯤꯕ ꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏ ꯑꯁꯤꯅ ꯃꯤꯇꯩꯂꯣꯟ ꯁꯤ ꯑꯆꯝꯕ ꯈꯟꯅ ꯅꯩꯅꯕꯒꯤ ꯃꯇꯥꯡꯗ ꯁꯦꯝꯒꯠꯄ ꯉꯝꯃꯤ ꯫
  • mni 3 ꯃꯁꯤ ꯁꯤꯖꯤꯟꯅꯔꯤꯕ ꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏ ꯑꯁꯤꯅ ꯃꯤꯇꯩꯂꯣꯟ ꯑꯁꯤ ꯌꯥꯝ ꯁꯣꯏꯍꯟꯗꯅ ꯏꯕꯗꯤ ꯉꯝꯃꯤ ꯫
  • mni 4 ꯃꯁꯤ ꯁꯤꯖꯤꯟꯅꯔꯤꯕ ꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏ ꯑꯁꯤꯅ ꯃꯤꯇꯩꯂꯣꯟ ꯁꯤ ꯏꯃꯥꯂꯣꯟꯒꯤ ꯃꯑꯣꯡꯒꯨꯝ ꯋꯥ-ꯉꯥꯡꯕ ꯉꯝꯕ (ꯑꯗꯨꯝ ꯑꯣꯏꯅꯃ. ꯑꯩꯒꯤ ꯏꯃꯥꯂꯣꯟꯗꯤ ꯅꯠꯇꯕ) ꯫
  • ‍mni 5 ꯃꯁꯤ ꯁꯤꯖꯤꯟꯅꯔꯤꯕ ꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏ ꯑꯁꯤꯅ ꯃꯤꯇꯩꯂꯣꯟ ꯁꯤ ꯁꯤꯟꯐꯝ ꯑꯃꯥ ꯑꯣꯏꯅ ꯍꯩꯔꯕ ꯑꯃꯗꯤ ꯈꯨꯃꯥꯡ ꯆꯥꯎꯁꯤꯟꯅ ꯌꯥꯝ ꯍꯩꯅ ꯑꯇꯣꯞꯄ ꯂꯣꯟꯗ ꯍꯟꯗꯣꯛꯄ ꯉꯝꯕ ꯫
  • mni N ꯃꯁꯤ ꯁꯤꯖꯤꯟꯅꯔꯤꯕ ꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏ ꯑꯁꯤꯅ ꯃꯤꯇꯩꯂꯣꯟ ꯁꯤ ꯏꯃꯥꯂꯣꯟ ꯑꯣꯏꯖꯕ ꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡ ꯄꯟꯊꯩ-ꯄꯥꯎꯔꯧ ꯂꯣꯏꯅ ꯈꯪꯕ ꯍꯩꯕ ꯫

  • For Meetei Mayek font

Incubator:Wp/mni/ꯃꯔꯨꯑꯣꯏꯕ ꯂꯥꯃꯥꯏ

  • See also

Meetei language

We used " ꯫ " as full stop in writing an article in Meetei Mayek

Thank you for your helpEdit

Thank you for your help. I appreciate everything you've been doing to help the cause here—fixing incorrectly created requests here, updating the "Tests" templates at Incubator, and so forth. It's a big help. A couple of items going forward:

  • Requests for new languages/Wikisource Literary Chinese: I just posted a for-now conclusion. You can comment eventually, but why don't you wait a few days and see what everyone else (especially Bobo) has to say first. To me, you're kind of on the border between "worker bees" and "regular contributors"; I'd like to see what the pure "regular contributors" have to say first. (That's intended as a compliment for you, not an insult.)
  • Requests for new languages (in general): I think I've addressed all of the following:
    • New requests (except for a couple of Wikisource, Wikivoyage and Wiktionary requests)
    • Everything that you reset (as long as I've otherwise covered those projects for those dates—at least one was a 2016 request for a project where I haven't gotten to 2016 yet).
    • Wikipedia requests from 2013.
The only things that I've left behind (that weren't already left behind, like the Balochi requests) are the following:
  • WP Hindustani: I'm pretty confident I will go ahead and reject that in a few days. But I thought it was worth making an effort on this one.
  • WP Ancient Greek: LangCom is still resisting a broader move into Wikipedias in ancient/historical languages. I want to make them decide on this one, though. It's been sitting too long, and feels stupid in comparison to the already existing projects in Latin, Literary Chinese, and Sanskrit. I'm trying to push a couple of other things through LangCom right now, but will do that one soon.
  • WP Taivoan and WQ Minangkabau: I've put questions on those request pages, and am waiting for answers.
  • Wikinews Literary Chinese: That was waiting until I finished the WS decision. I'm probably going to ask a question at Incubator as to what people are thinking, but will shortly reject.
  • incubator:Wp/hep: Invalid code. But let me go ahead and handle this, as I am already doing, OK? Don't put it at RfD or anything; I've already got it in process.

Thanks again. StevenJ81 (talk) 18:01, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

@StevenJ81: But then, how do you think about Requests for new languages/Wikiversity Polish 2? IIRC, this was created as "eligible" by GerardM which is official langcom member, isn't this a COI problem? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 21:28, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
If I thought there were a real COI then I'd consider addressing it. But
  • as a LangCom member, he's allowed to create requests with the status "eligible"
  • he wasn't really involved in the project
  • there's no question that a project like that is eligible, unless the request goes stale—and they weren't really rejecting requests as stale back then, and
  • this happened 11 years ago.
So I am not going to worry about that. StevenJ81 (talk) 21:37, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
And, are Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Tshiluba and Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Luba-Lulua (on hold) duplicated? Because both point to same incubator:Wp/lua. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:40, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Entirely possible. I haven't gotten to 2016 requests, so I haven't looked at the earlier one. Just mark them as you have been doing, and I'll get to them over time. The one's hold expires next month, so I'll probably dispose of both requests at that time. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:00, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

One other thing...Edit

If you find one of these incorrectly started as "eligible", but you see an edit by a LangCom member in the history that doesn't correct the problem, assume that the LangCom member has silently agreed. If you want, you can change the date on the main page to the date of the LangCom member's edit, but you don't necessarily have to bother, either. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:20, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Liuxinyu970226".