Steward requests/Global

This page hosts requests for global (un)blocks, (un)locks and hidings.

For global IP or account block requests, read the guideline and make a request below under Requests for global (un)block. Indicate why a global block is necessary and for how long.
For account lock requests, read the guideline and post under Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding.
For local requests here on Meta, see Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat.

If you are here because you have been affected by a global block, please see Global blocks/FAQ for more information about global block and routes to appeal.

Note: (un)blocks apply to IP addresses or accounts; and (un)locks apply to global accounts.

Cross-wiki requests
CheckUser information Global blocks/locks Permissions (global) Permissions (bot) Permissions (other) Username changes/ usurpation requests Miscellaneous requests URL blacklisting Title/username blacklisting Email blacklisting
Meta-Wiki requests
CheckUser information Deletion Permissions Requests for help

Requests for global (un)block

Latest comment: 1 hour ago20 comments11 people in discussion

Please be sure to follow the instructions below:

Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.

Please also review Global blocking.

Global blocks don't affect Meta-Wiki, so if your IP address or account is blocked, you can still appeal here. IP addresses or accounts that cause disruption on Meta should be reported at Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat instead of here so that they can be blocked locally.

Please describe the kind of cross wiki abusive activity you see from the IP or account. Saying an IP or account is a long term abuser is not helpful, but saying "IP vandalizes at ban.wikipedia, no.wikipedia and vi.wikipedia" is. This is especially important for range blocks. If you do not provide enough details, your request might be declined.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

You know the IP address(es) or accounts you wish to have globally blocked or unblocked.
For blocks, the global blocking criteria are met.
For unblocks, your request addresses the original reason for blocking the IP or account, if any.

To make a request for the address(es) or account(s) to be blocked or unblocked

Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why the address(es) or account(s) should be blocked/unblocked.

=== Global block/unblock for [[Special:Contributions/Some IP address or account|Some IP address or account]] ===
{{Status}} <!-- Do not remove this template -->
* {{Luxotool|IP address/username}}
Description, evidence, diffs, etc. --~~~~

When requesting that your IP be unblocked, note that stewards need to know your IP address to even consider a request.: To find your IP, please visit https://www.whatismyip.com/; You are not required to disclose your IP in public - you may make requests privately to any steward on IRC or by email at: stewards wikimedia org

Global block for 103.103.88.255

Status: In progress

103.103.88.255 xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye

Spam / spambot. Eihel (talk) 06:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

See this rq : an account created for the same spam as this IP. Cordially. —Eihel (talk) 06:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 84.125.73.9

Status: In progress

84.125.73.9 xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye

Cross-wiki abuse, same as 77.211.5.24 xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye, 47.60.43.134 xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye, 84.124.250.106 xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye and more. --CaféBuzz (talk) 09:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 213.142.96.27

Status: Done

213.142.96.27 xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye

Long-term abuse. Cross-wiki abuse. Used by en:WP:HEVAL. Became active the day the latest sock was blocked. Edits the same topic area, adds the same POV. Within the same IP range (see LTA report). Aintabli (talk) 17:29, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Robot clerk note: Done by EPIC. MajavahBot (talk) 18:25, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 190.6.23.227

Status: In progress

190.6.23.227 xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye

Long-term abuse. The raging LATs back, Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 20:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 138.64.199.54

Status: Done

138.64.199.54 xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye

Open proxy. CFA (talk) 20:47, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Robot clerk note: Done by AmandaNP. MajavahBot (talk) 21:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 163.171.174.26

Status: Done

163.171.174.26 xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye

proxy. Estrellato (talk) 20:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Robot clerk note: Done by AmandaNP. MajavahBot (talk) 21:25, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 2A01:CB20:40D1:4600:91A8:39F3:F9E:346E

Status: Done

2A01:CB20:40D1:4600:91A8:39F3:F9E:346E xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye

Cross-wiki abuse XReport --TenWhile6 21:52, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Robot clerk note: Done by EPIC. MajavahBot (talk) 22:25, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 2601:CD:C800:FD60:DC31:7857:9FA2:2F1C

Status: Done

2601:CD:C800:FD60:DC31:7857:9FA2:2F1C xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye

Cross-wiki abuse XReport --TenWhile6 22:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Robot clerk note: Done by EPIC. MajavahBot (talk) 22:25, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 14.101.163.7

Status: Done

14.101.163.7 xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye

Jaden Norton-Young LTA. XReport --نوفاك اتشمان (talk) 00:07, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Robot clerk note: Done by EPIC. MajavahBot (talk) 00:25, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 192.139.27.23

Status: Done

192.139.27.23 xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye

Cross-wiki abuse. SCP-2000 00:41, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Robot clerk note: Done by EPIC. MajavahBot (talk) 01:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 153.107.12.182

Status: Done

153.107.12.182 xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye

Long-term abuse. Lock/ban evasion. RichardHornsby XReport --SHB2000 (t • c) 00:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Robot clerk note: Done by EPIC. MajavahBot (talk) 01:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding

Latest comment: 35 minutes ago22 comments10 people in discussion

Be sure to follow the instructions below:

Your request might be rejected if it doesn't include the necessary information.
Warning! This page is publicly viewable. If the account name is grossly insulting or contains personal information please contact a steward privately in #wikimedia-stewards^connect or email your request to the stewards VRT queue at stewards-oversight wikimedia org (direct wiki interface) but do not post it here. Thanks.
Warning! This is not the place to ask for locks based on your opinion that someone is disruptive. Global locks are used exclusively against vandalism and spam, not because of content disputes, not because you think that someone deserves to be globally blocked. In such cases, you should ask for local blocks at appropriate places.
If you are globally locked, you should appeal your lock to stewards-appeals wikimedia org.

Please describe abusive activity of an account before reporting them here. Since stewards are often not active at projects the reported accounts are, things that seem obvious to you may not be equally obvious to the reviewing steward.

Instructions for making a request

Before requesting that a global account be (un)locked, please be sure that:

You have evidence of cross-wiki disruption from the account(s).
You can show that it is not feasible to use local-only blocks or other measures like page protection to combat the disruption.
You have considered making the request in #wikimedia-stewards^connect, especially for account names which will be hidden, or for urgent requests.

To make a request for an account to be locked or unlocked: Copy one of the codes below to the bottom of this section and explain why the account(s) should be locked/unlocked.

=== Global lock/unlock for Foo ===
{{status}} <!-- do not remove this template -->
* {{LockHide|username}}
* {{LockHide|username|hidename=1}} <!-- if you do not want the name to be visible on this page -->
*...
Reasons, etc. --~~~~

For many accounts:

=== Global lock for spambots/vandals ===
{{status}} <!-- do not remove this template -->
{{MultiLock|username|username2|username3}}
{{MultiLock|username|username2|username3|hidename=1}} <!-- if you do not want the names to be visible on this page -->
*...
Reasons, etc, --~~~~

Global lockfor Jackson Kambale Kisangani

Status: In progress

Jackson Kambale Kisangani (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date ^(alt) • CA • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser)

Cross-wiki spammer/self-promoter. --Graham87 (talk) 01:24, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Graham87: would you normally block this on enwiki? With this sort of non-spambot cross-wiki abuse without any local blocks I would typically leave it for local admins to handle, though if you are not doing so in expectation of a global block that could help to justify global action. – Ajraddatz (talk) 05:00, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Ajraddatz: I would've blocked them locally if they'd been warned for their first edit there in 2019. Their frwiki edits (along with their interactions on their talk page there) don't seem particularly promising either, which is why I brought this here. I agree this case isn't the highest priority in the world though. Graham87 (talk) 07:46, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply