Today is Friday, December 1, 2023, and the current time is 07:22 (UTC). There are currently 139,028 pages

Recent troll edit

Hello Hasley, a colleague of mine on the English Wikinews received an intimidating email from an account containing many Bs in its name, making threats against a sysop on another community, which you locked shortly afterwards. Is their email access automatically revoked? Thanks, Heavy Water (talk) 19:02, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Heavy Water. Their email access is, indeed, revoked, because locks prevent them even from logging into their account. Best Sgd. —Hasley 19:49, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ah, good, thanks. Heavy Water (talk) 19:52, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Hasley 15:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please whitelist User:Styyx on CVN edit

I don't know why but this user was blacklisted on CVN, I have checked the block log of all projects they are active, but nothing showed up. I believe this is a bug or something, please whitelist them, thanks.--Lemonaka (talk) 22:58, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done. Sgd. —Hasley 23:01, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mykolas7 edit

I'm not logged my account in, so I'm reporting this account here. Reason: LTA/Impersonation. Thanks! – 2405:4802:1AB:E140:91F9:4320:8977:E239 14:35, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ApprenticeFan Cross-wiki vandalism. (I don't know why, is this account compromised?).2405:4802:1AB:E140:91F9:4320:8977:E239 15:04, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
All done now. Sgd. —Hasley 16:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open meeting edit

Hello, all. The mw:Editing team is starting a new project, mw:Edit check. They are particularly seeking the views of RecentChanges patrollers and other reviewers. One of the open questions is: When should the visual editor encourage people to add a citation?

The meeting will be this coming Friday, 3 March 2023. More information is available at mw:Editing team/Community Conversations#3 March 2023. I hope that you will be able to attend, but if you aren't, please consider leaving your advice to the team on the talk page. They would particularly value hearing about the citation standards at different Wikipedias, and also what you think the biggest problem is with the first edits made by new editors. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:59, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Necesito ayuda edit

Hola, te hablo en español porque no soy un hablante fluido del inglés. Ya habia visitado wikipedia en varias ocasionas, sin embargo nunca habia hecho una contribucion. Hoy quería editar una pagina por primera vez y me sale que mi ip esta baneada por "Long term abuse", hasta el 21 abril. Me gustaría que me pudieras indicar la razón del bloqueo, si ha sido un error o lo que sea. Si te ayuda mi Ip es

Hola. El bloqueo no está dirigido a ti. La razón de este es que un vándalo ha usado el rango de direcciones en el que estás, lo que nos ha obligado a bloquearlo todo. Si continuas teniendo problemas, puedes acudir al canal de IRC #wikimedia-ayudaconnect, donde te podremos atender con mayor celeridad. Sgd. —Hasley 01:58, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Request global IP blocks for 2001:448A:60A0:0:0:0:0:0/44 edit

Guys, please make global block 2001:448A:60A0:0:0:0:0:0/44 from editing the sitewide of across Wikimedia projects because it was used by many LTA suspected user, especially LTA Lampung for doing any cross-wiki abuse since 2016.... Thanks..... 2001:448A:1021:28B1:C59F:A812:6C71:A565 00:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

viajes edit

I have amended one of the global filters to manage this as a TLD, it fits into the problematic domains that should not be appearing in small/medium wikis.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:54, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Loke Gustafsson edit

Hi, I just noticed that you set a global lock of Loke Gustafsson. A few weeks ago I investigated sv:Special:Contributions/Loke Gustafsson, see e.g. sv:Diskussion:Bojkotten av internationella matematikerkongressen 2022. A young maths-interested person with that name exists in the real world[1][2], so at the time I could imagine at least three different possibilities:

  1. Loke Gustafsson the person is behind both the Loke Gustafsson account and the other Remitbuber accounts
  2. Loke Gustafsson the person was impersonated by the person behind the Remitbuber accounts
  3. Loke Gustafsson the person created the Loke Gustafsson account but not the others, just unwittingly translated Remitbuber material, by his own admission at least partially automatically (and it shows...)

As you might imagine, I'm not too enthusiastic about automatic translations of these rather weak articles, regardless of who created them, so I'm not at this point asking for an unlocking. I'm still a bit curious about the reasoning behind the global lock. What do you think about the likelihoods of my three scenarios, and do you think there are other scenarios that I've overlooked? Could Special:CentralAuth/Impraforad be a new Remitbuber account? // Essin (talk) 20:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, Essin. The person behind Remitbuber has disclosed in the past his real-life identity. For this and other reasons (which I will not elaborate for privacy's sake), I can safely say that the account Loke Gustafsson is definitely not the real Gustafsson, but one of the dozens of socks used by Remitbuber.
As for Impraforad, it is indeed another sock of Remitbuber. Accordingly, I have locked that acount. Thank you for your message, Sgd. —Hasley 13:59, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you, this is useful information. I will follow up on this on svWP. // Essin (talk) 16:15, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unblock Request edit

Hi, I would like to request an unblock from all Wikipedias. I apologize for any rules I may have broken. I will try to be more constructive this time. I appreciate it -- 03:45, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Need your input on a policy impacting gadgets and UserJS edit

Dear interface administrator,

This is Samuel from the Security team and I hope my message finds you well.

There is an ongoing discussion on a proposed policy governing the use of external resources in gadgets and UserJS. The proposed Third-party resources policy aims at making the UserJS and Gadgets landscape a bit safer by encouraging best practices around external resources. After an initial non-public conversation with a small number of interface admins and staff, we've launched a much larger, public consultation to get a wider pool of feedback for improving the policy proposal. Based on the ideas received so far, the proposed policy now includes some of the risks related to user scripts and gadgets loading third-party resources, best practices for gadgets and UserJS developers, and exemptions requirements such as code transparency and inspectability.

As an interface administrator, your feedback and suggestions are warmly welcome until July 17, 2023 on the policy talk page.

Have a great day!

Samuel (WMF), on behalf of the Foundation's Security team 12:08, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sockpuppet on hiwiki edit

Dear Hasley, after a long time, today I request to please globally lock Testerppp9 is a sockpuppet account of Btw Santhosh and before 4 days MP199 was maked a checker user request on Steward requests/Checkuser and I think Btw Santhosh's more account present in hiwiki. Please see Testerppp9's contributions on hiwiki, he creates a article releated to Btw santhosh, I hope you help me releated to this topic. Kind regards-- Âvîrâm7(talk) 07:54, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done. Sgd. —Hasley 13:21, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Dear Hasley, thanks for globally lock this account.Kind regards-- Âvîrâm7(talk) 14:22, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Global lock request edit

Dear Hasley, Hello and Please Global lock for Rajendra Bhagat and Dhirendra Rathod both user is a currently blocked on hiwiki due to Paid editing and he has violated the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use as well as the Hindi Wikipedia 's policy , and he has been blocked on commons for other reasons. please lock this account globally, for more information please see This.

Note -Dhirendra Rathod is blocked as sockpuppet of Rajendra Bhagat. I thinks both account is operates by 1 person if checkuser is useful on this situation, please help us.Kind regards-- Âvîrâm7(talk) 05:56, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Dear Hasley, Thank for globally locked these account as sockpuppet account. Kind regards-- Âvîrâm7(talk) 04:22, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

please lock and block the ip edit 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 18:55, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Handled. Thank you for the notice. Sgd. —Hasley 18:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
+ IP 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 14:52, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Blocked. Sgd. —Hasley 15:02, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

CVN Whitelist update request edit

Dear Hasley, Please we request to you please update my status of my on CVN whitelist -: patroller on meta. Kind regards Kind regards~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 13:48, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

T'he escrit a :en edit

Ara he vist que potser t'hauria d'haver escrit aquí. El missatge és a en:User talk:Hasley#Blocatge general a Mallorca. Gràcies, Paucabot (talk) 09:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No puedo ejercer el derecho de defensa en WP en aragonés edit

Hola, Hasley. He visto que eres steward y te contacto a ti y a MarcoAurelio por si uno de los dos o ambos podéis arreglar este problema. Tiene relación con WP en aragonés, un idioma que un hablante nativo de español peninsular puede entender (yo soy filólogo y hablo 7 idiomas, por lo que puedo ayudaros a traducir lo que no entendáis; los administradores de esa WP pueden ayudaros también, aunque desconozco su disposición).

  1. Hace dos años manifesté en WP en aragonés mi oposición a que se usaran en esa wiki una categoría de imágenes no libres que su autor concedía para usarse solo en WP en aragonés, aduciendo yo que se trataba de una licencia nacionalista y por tanto contraria a los principios humanistas (estos es, universalistas) de Wikipedia. Cuatro administradores se opusieron a mi pretensión, incurriendo en algún caso en faltas de etiqueta. Lo dejé pasar.
  2. Hace unos días volví a leer esos mensajes y vi que la intervención del administrador Cembo123 (22:40 23 chul 2021) era inaceptablemente ofensiva: «déjame o déjanos (lo que prefieras) aparte de tus rollos mentales y paranoias de confabulaciones y conspiranoias». Haciendo uso de mis derecho como usuario, solicité en el tablón de los bibliotecarios que a) se borrasen las expresiones ofensivas y b) se amonestase al usuario administrador que las profirió. Como se puede comprobar leyéndolas, todas mis intervenciones han sido respetuosas en el fondo y en las formas.
  3. Sorprendentemente, la reacción a mi solicitud ha consistido en que el administrador Lázaro d’Aragon me ha bloqueado para siempre en WP:AN aduciendo «comportamiento disruptivo» (bloqueo #2280), explicando su decisión en mi página de discusión. Además, el administrador Cembo123, cuyas ofensas de hace dos años yo había denunciado, las ha reiterado aquí: «tus actuaciones y comentarios en la wikipedia podrían deberse más a un delirio que a una paranoia» (traducción al español mía).
  4. En el mensaje que se genera cuando quiero contestar al bloqueo se me indica que mi derecho a la defensa consiste únicamente en que puedo enviar un correo electrónico al administrador que me ha bloqueado o a otro administrador. Sin embargo, no puedo hacerlo porque el bloqueo incluye la imposibilidad física de enviar ningún correo electrónico a ningún usuario.

Por ahora solo pido ayuda para poder ejercer mi derecho de defensa en las condiciones adecuadas, y eso incluye que se cumplan una de estas dos condiciones:

  1. Que se active mis permisos de edición para expresar mis alegaciones al bloqueo de manera pública, en mi página de usuario y/o en la página del tablón en la que se publica la acusación contra mí. El bloqueo y los motivos por los que se aplica están a la vista de todos e incluyen acusaciones (aunque infundadas en este caso) denigratorias contra mi persona. Por lógica, la defensa debe ser pública, y no dirigida por un email privado a un solo administrador: la publicidad es una de las normas que garantizan la justicia. Estoy seguro, además, de que la defensa del derecho al honor que se aplica en la legislación norteamericana por la que se rigen los proyectos de Wikimedia contemplan esta garantía.
  2. En el peor de los casos, solicito que se activen mis permisos para enviar un correo privado a uno de los administradores. A pesar de que considero que este procedimiento es lesivo para mi derecho a la defensa, estoy dispuesto a cumplir los procedimientos establecidos en WP:AN con vistas a ejercer, más adelante, otras acciones sin que pueda reprochárseme no haber agotado previamente las posibilidades de defensa que ofrecen los cauces establecidos.

Aunque obviamente considero que el bloqueo es injusto, quiero dejar claro que en este mensaje solo pido ayuda para ejercer el derecho de defensa. Es de esperar que, una vez lo ejerza, un administrador de WP:AN arreglará todo lo que se ha hecho mal.

Muchas gracias. Quedo a la espera de tu respuesta. Si tu rol de steward no incluye realizar estas tareas, te agradeceré que me orientes sobre qué procedimiento seguir. Pompilos (talk) 16:25, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]