Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago by RadiX in topic Final decisions (by stewards)
This page allows for general discussion and questions regarding the 2021 steward confirmations.

Final decisions (by stewards) edit

Confirmation discussions will remain open from 27 February 2021, 06:00 (UTC) till 06 March 2021, 14:00 (UTC). This may be extended to two weeks for one or more confirmations at the discretion of the Election Committee if the committee believes further input is required before concluding. The Election Committee will close these discussions and implement the outcome (which also means making a decision in non-obvious cases).

This page is for steward discussion only. Please do not comment in this box unless you are a steward.

The summaries below provide a very strict overview of the most relevant confirmation comments.

Stewards: Please leave your comments right below the boxes after reviewing the actual confirmation comments and your understanding of relevant policies. You may summarize the confirmation discussions in individual comments, but no overall summary is given.

Status Candidate Notes
   Confirmed
-revi clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Base clear consensus to confirm
   Resigned
BRPever did not run for confirmation
   Confirmed
Bsadowski1 clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Defender clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
DerHexer clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Einsbor clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Green Giant clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
HakanIST clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Hoo man clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Jon Kolbert clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Jyothis clear consensus to confirm
   Resigned
Krd resigned during the confirmations
   Confirmed
Linedwell clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
MarcoAurelio clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Mardetanha clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Martin Urbanec clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Masti clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Matanya clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Melos clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
MusikAnimal clear consensus to confirm
   Resigned
NahidSultan did not run for confirmation
   Confirmed
QuiteUnusual clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
RadiX clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Ruslik0 clear consensus to confirm
   Removed
Rxy consensus to remove
   Confirmed
Sakretsu clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Schniggendiller clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Shanmugamp7 clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Sotiale clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Stryn clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Tegel clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Tks4Fish clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Trijnstel clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Vituzzu clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Wim b clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
علاء clear consensus to confirm
Results
The confirmation discussions are now closed. Please check the results just above.
For the Election Committee, RadiX 14:24, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

-revi edit

  Keep: 146 (active / very active / competent / trusted / helpful / friendly / knowledgeable / one of the best stewards / helps in various areas / strong judgement / no concerns / no reason given)
  Remove: 1 (communication issues and willingness to help the community)
  Neutral: 1 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Base edit

  Keep: 86 (active / active in rights management / no concerns / helpful / useful / friendly / competent / no reason given)
  Remove: 1 (no reason given)
  Neutral: 2 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Bsadowski1 edit

  Keep: 71 (trusted / very active / one of the most active stewards / LTA - spambot and LTA fighter / helpful / responsive / responsive on locks / helpful / always on IRC)
  Remove: 3 (communication issues / uncivility / only reachable on IRC / no reason given)
  Neutral: 5 (communication concerns / no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Defender edit

  Keep: 63 (active / active at counter-vandalism tasks / very helpful / no issues at all / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 3 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

DerHexer edit

  Keep: 139 (responsive oversighter / active everywhere / good long-term work besides low activity this year / active enough / trustworthy / no concerns / good job / experienced / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 1 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Einsbor edit

  Keep: 62 (active enough / AAR related tasks / very helpful / useful / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 3 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Green Giant edit

  Keep: 58 (active steward / no issues / commited / dedicated / other)
  Remove: 1 (no reason given)
  Neutral: 4 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

HakanIST edit

  Keep: 62 (active enough / active / ok but activity should improve / useful / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 2 (silent person / no reason given)
  Neutral: 3 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hoo man edit

  Keep: 45 (trusted user / long-term steward / benefit of doubt / unprecedented times / no reason given)
  Weak keep: 5 (acceptable activity / activity should improve in the future / activity should not be considered a serious concern in 2020, athough he should be more more active this year on)
  Remove: 11 (entirely absent in a given period of the year / activity is not enough to retain stewardship / inactivity / demonstrated low activity for the last few years / half a year inactive / no reason given)
  Neutral: 8 (activity level / no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Jon Kolbert edit

  Keep: 72 (helpful in blocking proxies / proxies work / highly active in global blocking / most active steward of 2020 / active everywhere / useful / no concerns / active in IRC/SRG and elsewhere / other / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 3 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Jyothis edit

  Keep: 35 (positive experiences / based on promised increase in activity / it's fine to give a pass on activity in 2020 / somewhat active in 2020 / no reason given / long intervals of absence should not be counted since he was more active in the past years)
  Weak keep: 1
  Remove: 14 (inactivity / not enough activity / not an admin elesewhere / unacceptable amount of inactivity despite of the pandemic / no reason given)
  Neutral: 12 (no active enough / not enough for a weak keep / activity is a concern in spite of being a useful steward / not active enough to retain stewardship / complete breaks in 2020 / no presence at all / no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Linedwell edit

  Keep: 54 (good at monitoring small wikis / active enough / active in renaming / friendly / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 2 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

MarcoAurelio edit

  Keep: 101 (very competent / helpful / active all around / active in almost every task / helpful in AAR tasks / very good steward / awesome / experienced / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 2 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Mardetanha edit

  Keep: 68 (active and helpful in IRC / improved from previous confirmations / active in 2020 / no concerns / trusted user / experienced user / good communication skills / neutral person / there is no evidence for government interference throughout Mardetanha's past-current terms / controversies are based on speculation / there is no wrongdoing / user has never abused his rights / multilingual / user always follows Wikimedia policies / user has not violated any of the community guidelines / cases where state authorities exert pressure on Wikipedia volunteers are quickly noticeable / Mardetanha has assured his account is being operated in a safe environment / there is no connection between Persian Wikipedia and the Iranian government / no reason given)
  Remove: 4 (impulsive steward / concerns related to the closure of a RfC / concerns about him living in Iran)
  Neutral: 4 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Martin Urbanec edit

  Keep: 127 (very active / one of the most active stewards / helpful / extremely helpful / friendly / competent / reachable on IRC / great amount of work / trusted / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 14 (behavior on czwiki / replies at SRCU / huge number of checks done in 2020 / too much power and responsability in his hands / no reason given)
  Neutral: 3

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Masti edit

  Keep: 73 (available on IRC / spambot fighter / highly active in account locking / one of the most active stewards / useful / good work / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 3 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Matanya edit

  Keep: 52 (good at anti-vandalism / active enough although activity should be improved / activity on the low side / experienced / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 2 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Melos edit

  Keep: 47 (helpful / no issues / should come back in 2021 / no reason given)
  Weak keep: 1 (inactive the whole year but able to restore activity)
  Remove: 7 (inactivity / no reason given)
  Neutral: 5 (activity on the low side / other / no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

MusikAnimal edit

  Keep: 84 (competent / very competent / friendly / trusted / very helpful / excellent coder / good work / no concerns / no reason given)
  Remove: 1 (no reason given)
  Neutral: 1 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

QuiteUnusual edit

  Keep: 55 (no concerns / good at fighting spambots / good activity / useful work / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 1 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

RadiX edit

  Keep: 69 (no issues / active enough / amazing steward / good work / no concerns / exquisite taste in coffee and vast knowlegde of riots (things of utmost importance for stewardship according to TonyBallioni) / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 1 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ruslik0 edit

  Keep: 75 (active enough / active / active in locking accounts / no concerns / trusted / no reason given)
  Remove: 2 (issue towards tolerating breach of global policies)
  Neutral: 2 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

rxy edit

  Keep: 23 (perceived or alleged abuse of power that occurred on homewiki has nothing to do with steward status / self-requested removal on homewiki / good work as a steward / lack of communction between jawiki community and rxy / the only japanase speaker steward / a good track of anti-vandalism work / one of most active stewards / helpful in fighting LTAs and spam / ISECHIKA / responsible person / Rxy has not abused his steward rights by asking someone to resign / mostly a misunderstanding between Rxy and the jawiki community / mostly a local conflict / steward rights were not involved-abused / he should not be considered guilty by contacting T&S as he felt like there was a valid reason to do so / highly active steward / all efforts against LTAs should be appreciated )
  Remove: 53 (abuse of power / long-term community-block on homewiki / lack of transparency on issues at home wiki / does not hold permissions on own homewiki / lack of minimum local support / testwiki sysop status does not qualify for SE / issues on jawiki shoud be better explained / usage of Steward status to turn a local conflict into his own favor / loss of confidence on homewiki / more than seven months of inactivity / not eligible for SE2021 / a community-block is a serious concern, although he is helpful in fighting LTA / nice counter vandalism work / T&S has been used as a threat or weapon / disgusting behavior / nobody can explain what really happened on jawiki / threats to other users / other stewards are able to do what he currenty does / too much controversy / no reason given)
  Neutral: 13 (considerably active as a steward on tasks done by a few others / competent steward despite the controversy / he should be evaluated as a steward outside of home wiki / no reason given)

Outcome:   Not confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sakretsu edit

  Keep: 71 (trusted user / sound steward / honest / forthcoming / one of the most active stewards / active / helpful / no concerns / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 2 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Schniggendiller edit

  Keep: 94 (active / good work / helpful / competent / excellent steward / active in global locking and blocking / good at fighting LTA / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 2 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Shanmugamp7 edit

  Keep: 46 (experienced and active / active enough / tamil speaking steward / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 3 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sotiale edit

  Keep: 123 (very active at SRCU and SRG / contributions at SRCU / active at SRCU, SRG, SRP and elsewhere / great work overall / good work / impressive stats / excellent steward / great steward / high level performance / one of the most active stewards / outstanding work on zhwiki / combat of sockpupptry and cross-wiki abuse / trustworthy / patient / friendly / available on IRC / no evidence of actual wrongdoing / no concerns / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 2 (excessive use of CU tool / no reason given)
  Neutral: 2 (excessive use of CU tool / no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Stryn edit

  Keep: 73 (active / experienced / positive view / no concerns / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 3 (no reason given)