Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2021

Active discussions
Main page Stewards (2021 confirmation) talk page
This page allows for general discussion and questions regarding the 2021 steward confirmations.

Final decisions (by stewards)Edit

Confirmation discussions will remain open from 27 February 2021, 06:00 (UTC) till 06 March 2021, 14:00 (UTC). This may be extended to two weeks for one or more confirmations at the discretion of the Election Committee if the committee believes further input is required before concluding. The Election Committee will close these discussions and implement the outcome (which also means making a decision in non-obvious cases).

This page is for steward discussion only. Please do not comment in this box unless you are a steward.

The summaries below provide a very strict overview of the most relevant confirmation comments.

Stewards: Please leave your comments right below the boxes after reviewing the actual confirmation comments and your understanding of relevant policies. You may summarize the confirmation discussions in individual comments, but no overall summary is given.

Status Candidate Notes
   Confirmed
-revi clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Base clear consensus to confirm
   Resigned
BRPever did not run for confirmation
   Confirmed
Bsadowski1 clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Defender clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
DerHexer clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Einsbor clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Green Giant clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
HakanIST clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Hoo man clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Jon Kolbert clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Jyothis clear consensus to confirm
   Resigned
Krd resigned during the confirmations
   Confirmed
Linedwell clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
MarcoAurelio clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Mardetanha clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Martin Urbanec clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Masti clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Matanya clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Melos clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
MusikAnimal clear consensus to confirm
   Resigned
NahidSultan did not run for confirmation
   Confirmed
QuiteUnusual clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
RadiX clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Ruslik0 clear consensus to confirm
   Removed
Rxy consensus to remove
   Confirmed
Sakretsu clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Schniggendiller clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Shanmugamp7 clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Sotiale clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Stryn clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Tegel clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Tks4Fish clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Trijnstel clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Vituzzu clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
Wim b clear consensus to confirm
   Confirmed
علاء clear consensus to confirm
Results
The confirmation discussions are now closed. Please check the results just above.
For the Election Committee, RadiX 14:24, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

-reviEdit

  Keep: 146 (active / very active / competent / trusted / helpful / friendly / knowledgeable / one of the best stewards / helps in various areas / strong judgement / no concerns / no reason given)
  Remove: 1 (communication issues and willingness to help the community)
  Neutral: 1 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

BaseEdit

  Keep: 86 (active / active in rights management / no concerns / helpful / useful / friendly / competent / no reason given)
  Remove: 1 (no reason given)
  Neutral: 2 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Bsadowski1Edit

  Keep: 71 (trusted / very active / one of the most active stewards / LTA - spambot and LTA fighter / helpful / responsive / responsive on locks / helpful / always on IRC)
  Remove: 3 (communication issues / uncivility / only reachable on IRC / no reason given)
  Neutral: 5 (communication concerns / no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

DefenderEdit

  Keep: 63 (active / active at counter-vandalism tasks / very helpful / no issues at all / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 3 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

DerHexerEdit

  Keep: 139 (responsive oversighter / active everywhere / good long-term work besides low activity this year / active enough / trustworthy / no concerns / good job / experienced / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 1 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

EinsborEdit

  Keep: 62 (active enough / AAR related tasks / very helpful / useful / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 3 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Green GiantEdit

  Keep: 58 (active steward / no issues / commited / dedicated / other)
  Remove: 1 (no reason given)
  Neutral: 4 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

HakanISTEdit

  Keep: 62 (active enough / active / ok but activity should improve / useful / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 2 (silent person / no reason given)
  Neutral: 3 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Hoo manEdit

  Keep: 45 (trusted user / long-term steward / benefit of doubt / unprecedented times / no reason given)
  Weak keep: 5 (acceptable activity / activity should improve in the future / activity should not be considered a serious concern in 2020, athough he should be more more active this year on)
  Remove: 11 (entirely absent in a given period of the year / activity is not enough to retain stewardship / inactivity / demonstrated low activity for the last few years / half a year inactive / no reason given)
  Neutral: 8 (activity level / no reason given)

  • Confirm. Despite his activity being on the low side, Hoo man is a tech skilled steward and there is no evidence of wrongdoing here. RadiX 06:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm Activity a little low, but no concerns raised about trust, etc. QuiteUnusual (talk) 16:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm. Matanya (talk) 20:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm --Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:01, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm Concerns about low activity have been raised, but Hoo man promised to address them this term in his statement and overall the community seems happy to support continued access. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm per Radix and Marco. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 23:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm.--HakanIST (talk) 11:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm. --Wim b 11:12, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm. Trijnsteltalk 11:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm, einsbor talk 13:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm, Ruslik (talk) 13:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm -- Green Giant (talk) 18:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm Per Marco, RadiX. Rafael (stanglavine) msg 19:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm Many of us had reduced activity in 2020, and I think that's okay. Hooman has shown they are active again both in their statement and in their actions. No concerns from me. MusikAnimal talk 01:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm Operator873talkconnect 03:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm --Alaa :)..! 15:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm Stryn (talk) 15:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm -- Tegel (Talk) 09:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Jon KolbertEdit

  Keep: 72 (helpful in blocking proxies / proxies work / highly active in global blocking / most active steward of 2020 / active everywhere / useful / no concerns / active in IRC/SRG and elsewhere / other / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 3 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

JyothisEdit

  Keep: 35 (positive experiences / based on promised increase in activity / it's fine to give a pass on activity in 2020 / somewhat active in 2020 / no reason given / long intervals of absence should not be counted since he was more active in the past years)
  Weak keep: 1
  Remove: 14 (inactivity / not enough activity / not an admin elesewhere / unacceptable amount of inactivity despite of the pandemic / no reason given)
  Neutral: 12 (no active enough / not enough for a weak keep / activity is a concern in spite of being a useful steward / not active enough to retain stewardship / complete breaks in 2020 / no presence at all / no reason given)

  • Confirm. Activity is sometimes on the low side but still acceptable. RadiX 06:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm Activity is getting close to the unacceptable point, but 2020 was difficult for a lot of people. QuiteUnusual (talk) 16:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm. Matanya (talk) 20:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm as per discussion, the community is leaning towards confirmation--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:01, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Neutral Not opposing confirmation but the community concerns raised about Jyothis' inactivity are significant and cannot be disregarded. 2020 was an horrible year though. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm per QuiteUnusual. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 23:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm.--HakanIST (talk) 11:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Neutral. --Wim b 11:12, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm, leaning to neutral due to concerns about Jyothis' inactivity. Trijnsteltalk 11:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm, hope this year would be easier and Jyothis'll be more active. einsbor talk 13:21, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Neutral, low activity, not an admin anywhere. Ruslik (talk) 13:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm but hopefully more active this year. -- Green Giant (talk) 18:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm hope a next term with more activity. Rafael (stanglavine) msg 19:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm More than sufficient activity as of late. As others have said, 2020 was a challenging year for almost everyone. No concerns on my end. MusikAnimal talk 01:28, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm with hopes 2021 is a better year. Operator873talkconnect 03:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm --Alaa :)..! 15:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • ConfirmDerHexer (Talk) 12:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm Stryn (talk) 15:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Neutral per activity concerns, please raise your activity should you wish to re-confirm next year. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm -- Tegel (Talk) 09:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

LinedwellEdit

  Keep: 54 (good at monitoring small wikis / active enough / active in renaming / friendly / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 2 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

MarcoAurelioEdit

  Keep: 101 (very competent / helpful / active all around / active in almost every task / helpful in AAR tasks / very good steward / awesome / experienced / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 2 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

MardetanhaEdit

  Keep: 68 (active and helpful in IRC / improved from previous confirmations / active in 2020 / no concerns / trusted user / experienced user / good communication skills / neutral person / there is no evidence for government interference throughout Mardetanha's past-current terms / controversies are based on speculation / there is no wrongdoing / user has never abused his rights / multilingual / user always follows Wikimedia policies / user has not violated any of the community guidelines / cases where state authorities exert pressure on Wikipedia volunteers are quickly noticeable / Mardetanha has assured his account is being operated in a safe environment / there is no connection between Persian Wikipedia and the Iranian government / no reason given)
  Remove: 4 (impulsive steward / concerns related to the closure of a RfC / concerns about him living in Iran)
  Neutral: 4 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Martin UrbanecEdit

  Keep: 127 (very active / one of the most active stewards / helpful / extremely helpful / friendly / competent / reachable on IRC / great amount of work / trusted / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 14 (behavior on czwiki / replies at SRCU / huge number of checks done in 2020 / too much power and responsability in his hands / no reason given)
  Neutral: 3

  • Confirm. Concerns raised towards checkusering a given number of accounts are out of substance. All checks should be done in accordance to policy. A number itself does not mean anything. RadiX 06:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm The CU point misrepresents why Stewards use login.wiki CU, so not concerned about this. Vast majority of those commenting were supporting. QuiteUnusual (talk) 16:34, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm. Matanya (talk) 20:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm --Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:01, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  • ConfirmMarcoAurelio (talk) 12:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm. Also echoing QuiteUnusual's comments. A high number of LWCU simply means a lot of spambots being locked. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 23:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm.--HakanIST (talk) 11:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm. --Wim b 11:12, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm. Trijnsteltalk 11:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm, einsbor talk 13:22, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm, Ruslik (talk) 13:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm, the CU point needs to be put in a wider context. -- Green Giant (talk) 18:22, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm large support, LWCU is not a concern, no bad use of steward tools. Rafael (stanglavine) msg 19:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm MusikAnimal talk 01:30, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm Operator873talkconnect 03:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm --Alaa :)..! 15:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm Stryn (talk) 15:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm -- Tegel (Talk) 09:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

MastiEdit

  Keep: 73 (available on IRC / spambot fighter / highly active in account locking / one of the most active stewards / useful / good work / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 3 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

MatanyaEdit

  Keep: 52 (good at anti-vandalism / active enough although activity should be improved / activity on the low side / experienced / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 2 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

MelosEdit

  Keep: 47 (helpful / no issues / should come back in 2021 / no reason given)
  Weak keep: 1 (inactive the whole year but able to restore activity)
  Remove: 7 (inactivity / no reason given)
  Neutral: 5 (activity on the low side / other / no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

MusikAnimalEdit

  Keep: 84 (competent / very competent / friendly / trusted / very helpful / excellent coder / good work / no concerns / no reason given)
  Remove: 1 (no reason given)
  Neutral: 1 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

QuiteUnusualEdit

  Keep: 55 (no concerns / good at fighting spambots / good activity / useful work / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 1 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

RadiXEdit

  Keep: 69 (no issues / active enough / amazing steward / good work / no concerns / exquisite taste in coffee and vast knowlegde of riots (things of utmost importance for stewardship according to TonyBallioni) / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 1 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Ruslik0Edit

  Keep: 75 (active enough / active / active in locking accounts / no concerns / trusted / no reason given)
  Remove: 2 (issue towards tolerating breach of global policies)
  Neutral: 2 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

rxyEdit

  Keep: 23 (perceived or alleged abuse of power that occurred on homewiki has nothing to do with steward status / self-requested removal on homewiki / good work as a steward / lack of communction between jawiki community and rxy / the only japanase speaker steward / a good track of anti-vandalism work / one of most active stewards / helpful in fighting LTAs and spam / ISECHIKA / responsible person / Rxy has not abused his steward rights by asking someone to resign / mostly a misunderstanding between Rxy and the jawiki community / mostly a local conflict / steward rights were not involved-abused / he should not be considered guilty by contacting T&S as he felt like there was a valid reason to do so / highly active steward / all efforts against LTAs should be appreciated )
  Remove: 53 (abuse of power / long-term community-block on homewiki / lack of transparency on issues at home wiki / does not hold permissions on own homewiki / lack of minimum local support / testwiki sysop status does not qualify for SE / issues on jawiki shoud be better explained / usage of Steward status to turn a local conflict into his own favor / loss of confidence on homewiki / more than seven months of inactivity / not eligible for SE2021 / a community-block is a serious concern, although he is helpful in fighting LTA / nice counter vandalism work / T&S has been used as a threat or weapon / disgusting behavior / nobody can explain what really happened on jawiki / threats to other users / other stewards are able to do what he currenty does / too much controversy / no reason given)
  Neutral: 13 (considerably active as a steward on tasks done by a few others / competent steward despite the controversy / he should be evaluated as a steward outside of home wiki / no reason given)

  • After carefully reading the concerns raised here, I am not inclined to 'confirm' due to the loss of confidence caused by the incidents. Although I personally trust Rxy and admire his work as a Steward as well, I feel the exhausting controversy has ruined this confirmation. Rxy is a competent steward and also a tech-skilled one. One may say it could be dealt with differently, but others wouldn't give him a pass on mistakes like these, regardless of what could have been done afterwards. Time heals all wounds. RadiX 06:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Remove, with regret. While confirmations are a very different process from elections, rxy lost all of his advanced accesses at all content projects, and was blocked for a considerable period of time. I cannot reasonably vote Confirm for a candidate who would likely not pass regular elections, were they running for the first time (and not merely seeking confirmation). Thank you for all your work, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:50, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Remove The community has spoken. With such overwhelming support for removal we have no choice. QuiteUnusual (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  • regretful Remove. Thank you for what you have done! Matanya (talk) 20:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Remove it didn't end the way we all had hoped, but that's how it goes sometimes. Thank you for your work--Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:01, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Regretful remove. Cf. RadiX. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Regretful remove per Radix. Rxy is clearly competent and skilled, but has unfortunately lost the community's trust, and thus can't be confirmed. Thanks for all your work! —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 23:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Remove per Tks4Fish. --Wim b 11:12, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Remove, with regret. While I personally would have kept you, we have no choice. Trijnsteltalk 11:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Remove, the community decided. einsbor talk 13:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Remove, although what excatly happened on jawiki is still unclear to me. Ruslik (talk) 13:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Remove with regret -- Green Giant (talk) 18:27, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Remove unfortunately. Thank you for all your good work. Rafael (stanglavine) msg 19:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Clear consensus to remove. I share the regret others have. Thank you for your service. MusikAnimal talk 01:38, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Remove per RadiX. Operator873talkconnect 03:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Remove per Tks4Fish --Alaa :)..! 15:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Regretful remove. —DerHexer (Talk) 13:00, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Remove, unfortunately, per the community. Stryn (talk) 15:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Remove Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Remove -- Tegel (Talk) 09:28, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Outcome:   Not confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

SakretsuEdit

  Keep: 71 (trusted user / sound steward / honest / forthcoming / one of the most active stewards / active / helpful / no concerns / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 2 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

SchniggendillerEdit

  Keep: 94 (active / good work / helpful / competent / excellent steward / active in global locking and blocking / good at fighting LTA / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 2 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Shanmugamp7Edit

  Keep: 46 (experienced and active / active enough / tamil speaking steward / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 3 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

SotialeEdit

  Keep: 123 (very active at SRCU and SRG / contributions at SRCU / active at SRCU, SRG, SRP and elsewhere / great work overall / good work / impressive stats / excellent steward / great steward / high level performance / one of the most active stewards / outstanding work on zhwiki / combat of sockpupptry and cross-wiki abuse / trustworthy / patient / friendly / available on IRC / no evidence of actual wrongdoing / no concerns / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 2 (excessive use of CU tool / no reason given)
  Neutral: 2 (excessive use of CU tool / no reason given)

  • Confirm. The use of CU tool is within the policy. A number itself does not mean anything. RadiX 06:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm Per RadiX; number of checks made does not mean much, the justification for each of the checks do. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:45, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm No concerns or objections raised. QuiteUnusual (talk) 16:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm. Matanya (talk) 20:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm --Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:01, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
  • ConfirmMarcoAurelio (talk) 12:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm. See also my comment on #Martin Urbanec. A high number of checks doesn't mean a thing. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 23:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm.--HakanIST (talk) 11:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm. --Wim b 11:12, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm. Trijnsteltalk 11:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm, einsbor talk 13:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm -- Green Giant (talk) 18:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm Clear consensus. Again, LWCU is not a concern. Rafael (stanglavine) msg 19:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm MusikAnimal talk 01:40, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm per Tks4Fish Operator873talkconnect 03:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm --Alaa :)..! 15:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm Stryn (talk) 15:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Confirm -- Tegel (Talk) 09:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

StrynEdit

  Keep: 73 (active / experienced / positive view / no concerns / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 3 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

TegelEdit

  Keep: 78 (very active / no concerns / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 2 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Tks4FishEdit

  Keep: 111 (active / one of the most active stewards / trusted / always reachable on IRC / thoughtful / very competent / competent / excellent / very responsible with the tools / good job all around / helpful / trustworthy / quick / pleasent to interact with / no concerns / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 1 (re. a global lock)
  Neutral: 0

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

TrijnstelEdit

  Keep: 94 (active / helpful with mailing list management and IRC / kind / wonderful person / plays a irreplaceable role in the team / helpful / good experiences / net positive / communication / one of the best / reachable / no concerns / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 2 (biased decision on homewiki / communication issue)
  Neutral: 1 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

VituzzuEdit

  Keep: 78 (fully active / always available / one of the finest stewards / behind the scenes service / helpful in the background for IRC and mailing list / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 3 (biased / no reason given)
  Neutral: 1 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Wim bEdit

  Keep: 77 (highly active / very active / friendly / active with spambots and CUs / active in SRG, SRP and almost everywhere / very active in global (b)locking / helpful / contributions to itwiktionary / no issues / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 1 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

علاءEdit

  Keep: 111 (active / great steward / kind person / friendly / approachable / responsive in cross-wiki issues / helpful in AAR tasks / helpful / responsible / net positive / hard-working steward / no issues / no concerns / no reason given)
  Remove: 0
  Neutral: 1 (no reason given)

Outcome:   Confirmed. RadiX 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Return to "Stewards/Confirm/2021" page.