Stewards/Confirm/2021/-revi

< Stewards‎ | Confirm‎ | 2021

-revi edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: ko, en-3
Personal info: I was quite sick early 2020, to the point that I had to get a COVID testing just to be admitted to the hospital (tested negative though) - later when I was recovering, the "Wikipedia Foundation" saga happened and my activity in Wikimedia dropped to near-zero. (I was also busy with IRL event that suddenly emerged with COVID.)
After few months, I started to edit again, but at a lower frequency. I am not sure if I am still needed at the WMF projects, given WMF's "We don't care about community" attitude. I actually thought of resigning, but decided to stand for renewal this year because I think community still benefits from having one more steward from Asian timezone.
Only excuse I have for this year's low activity is COVID (yeah, easy excuse, but that's the largest hit around the world.). At least I expect my IRL pressure to (sorta) drop, so I will be more active this year. I've still processed some OS request and global locks involving suppression of usernames, in addition to what is publicly visible.
These days, I am not sure if I want to be a part of this movement, but I still believe in the community, not the WMF.

Full disclosure

My contract with WMF is over, as indicated by SE2020 statement. (See also: SE2018 / Confirmation 2019 / Confirmation 2020)
— regards, Revi 10:23, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

italiano:

Lingue:
Informazioni personali: translation needed

español:

Idiomas:
Información personal: translation needed

русский:

Языки:
Личная информация: translation needed

Deutsch:

Sprachen:
Informationen zur Person: translation needed

Nederlands:

Taalvaardigheid:
Persoonlijke informatie: translation needed

বাংলা:

ভাষা:
ব্যক্তিগত তথ্যাদি: translation needed

Comments about -revi edit

Keep. I'm going to get preachy for a second and draw attention to a brief conversation -revi and I had with WMF representatives here. Over the next few years, if the WMF continues along the path it is going, we all will have a decision to make. Quite frankly, the WMF has the capability to run the entire movement into the ground if they continue to ignore what the community (read: the people who write the content) has to say. At some point, there will be a number of high-profile departures of key community talent that will accelerate the process. But yet, especially today there is a need for accurate and free information, and Wikipedia still remains a top 15 site. And real people still face harassment on Wikimedia projects and need assistance from administrators, functionaries, and stewards. These are all things that we have to have to think very carefully about going forward. --Rs chen 7754 14:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Enough activity to justify, and willing to take up some of the hardest decisions like locking a compromised account recently, removal of sysop rights from Vodomar etc. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Active and competent. Blablubbs (talk) 14:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Active, trusted, competent. Giraffer (talk) 14:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, No concerns.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep laziness is often a good thing in the ranks. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 14:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I really enjoyed working with you. Respectfully, --Yuri Krestinichev (talk) 14:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep non-robotic and not afraid to speak up on issues that you believe should be addressed. I appreciate that. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 14:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 14:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Amanda (aka DQ) 15:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mehman 97 15:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active, trusted and no concerns from me. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | enwiki} 15:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Oh, I might have been like Dobby if he hadn't signed up for confirmation this year :p --Sotiale (talk) 15:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Saroj Uprety (talk) 15:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns. Miniapolis 16:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the best stewards, so yes if he wants continue. --MrJaroslavik (talk) 16:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep GeneralNotability (talk) 16:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Barkeep49 (talk) 18:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep KevinL (aka L235 · t) 18:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mz7 (talk) 18:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep YuzaTea (talk) 18:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — xaosflux ^Talk 18:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active user on permission requests and SRG, also helpful. --Uncitoyen^talk 19:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep useful. no concerns. --Stïnger （会話） 20:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep Good, active steward. --Count Count (talk) 21:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not the best steward around, but still a capable user that can handle stewardry. Leaderboard (talk) 21:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ToBeFree (talk) 22:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - competent, active and helpful. – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- dwf² ✉ 01:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Active, helpful and competent. No concerns. Meiræ 01:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep excellent steward. Java Hurricane 02:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Helpful on EnWP — pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 03:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 04:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 05:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 06:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 08:21, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. —— Eric Liu_{（留言．百科用戶頁）} 09:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Superpes15 (talk) 11:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lemure Saltante (talk) 13:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Michel Bakni (talk) 17:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Cooperative Person --Ibrahim.ID ✪ 17:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 17:59, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active, helpful, and competent steward. ~~It's refreshing to see that Revi took concerns about his role as WMF staff on board in the last confirmation.~~ I'm glad to enthusiastically support this time. OhKayeSierra (talk) 19:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, for the record: the contract was not renewed for other reason but I'm not going to get into specifics here on wiki. — regards, Revi 00:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep revi has been a competent and trusted steward. Thank you for your service and I look forward to continuing to working with you. Waggie (talk) 20:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 22:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ivi104 (talk) 00:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Kocgs (talk) 08:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Active, experienced, knowledgeable, friendly. AGK ■ 09:10, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove,when I English level is poor,ban I edit SRCU right after and don't communication with me,this is abuse of power,and discrimination my language skills,also,this steward don't need to help our community,and don't want to cooperate to stop sockpuppets destruction behavior.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I will just link the relevant communications: #. Also, it was performed under stewards-l's unanimous consensus at that time, that this user's SRCU submissions were problematic. — regards, Revi 10:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ElectCom member comment: Extended discussion around this topic has been moved to Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2021/-revi#Discussion for MCC214's comment. —Thanks for the fish! ^{talk•contribs} 17:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, helpful and qualified — NickK (talk) 13:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Don't bother with kids. --Techyan（Talk） 21:19, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --IWI (talk) 21:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep cool wäre ein Klick :) --Itti (talk) 22:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.--جار الله (talk) 02:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Yair rand (talk) 03:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AVSmalnad77 ^talk 05:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep useful. no concerns. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - No concerns.--Sun8908 (talk) 09:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep：--AlexLeeCN (talk) 14:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 21:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Iluvatar (talk) 00:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 12:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns and is a very helpful user. Hope to see you more active this year! R4356th (talk) 15:20, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Definitely a great user.Ahmetlii (talk) 16:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good steward, they're on the Discord server which is nice to see. Elliot321 (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep:--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 11:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, only logical end to your behavior is you are socking. — regards, Revi 03:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ElectCom member comment: Extended discussion around this topic has been moved to Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2021/-revi#Discussion for 蟲蟲飛's comment. —Thanks for the fish! ^{talk•contribs} 17:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep huh — Ddxfx 04:01, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- 94rain ^Talk 04:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Air7538 (talk) 07:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have no concerns about you --ARychlik (talk) 08:27, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:11, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Antigng (talk) 09:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --SDKmac (talk) 13:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Manchiu (talk) 13:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep duh. Praxidicae (talk) 15:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep tksk (talk) 17:37, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 17:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nehaoua (talk) 22:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : enough of all the chaos, and, at least with years of communication, I don't see revi cannot do the job at a satisfactory level (or higher)--1233 （T / C） 06:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Apploigize for the incompetence of the zhwiki community-AINH (talk) 17:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 20:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --LexICon (talk) 01:05, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We are waiting for your answer. Thanks.--Zangala (talk) 09:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Mark7747 (talk) 13:32, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Maestro Ivanković 19:17, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mykola7 (talk) 21:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Base (talk) 23:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lentokonefani (talk) 14:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Aspiriniks (talk) 06:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course, keep.—Impartial just (with out 2FA) (talk) 07:17, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 14:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure!--Faisal ^talk 05:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—〚 Arronwan 〛 09:33, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 11:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep chansey ^message? 13:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Geraki ^T_L 19:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Perrak (talk) 13:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 13:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Keep. He works very well. -- LaMagiaaa (talk) 16:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 19:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 15:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Don-kun (talk) 19:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Jules ^Talk 10:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 11:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I don't understand what is "cabal".--海の向こうは敵だ！ 14:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@BureibuNeko Cabal based on enwiktionary means these. Hope this clarifies what Cabal means. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 16:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Camouflaged Mirage： No, you got it wrong. I mean to ask him why he said WMC is "cacbl", but thank you for your kind reply!--海の向こうは敵だ！ 03:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporarily change the ticket. For some reasons, I decided to vote

Keep.--海の向こうは敵だ！ 03:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Darkhan 16:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep---Koala0090 (talk) 17:52, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Still support. Would it be much better to just use the factual description on handling matters, regarding to your comment: “Yeah, I know WMC cabal is trying to save her”[1]? --Gluo88 (talk) 19:25, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good steward, and upon meeting him, a wonderful human being.--Bonnielou2013 (talk) 21:14, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Dostojewskij (talk) 21:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep one of the best we have. —Jasper Deng (talk) 20:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Baycrest (talk) 17:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, however I think he may do more and be even more decisive. Σαν μο σα^{The Trve Lawe of free Monarchies} 02:54, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pedram^Talk 08:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep LGTM. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 15:29, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Absolutely ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 20:47, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --DannyS712 (talk) 22:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 04:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 10:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cabayi (talk) 14:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ——SerialNumber54129 17:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep DraconicDark (talk) 05:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 13:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 18:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 18:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 10:53, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stobaios (talk) 13:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Confirm/2021/-revi&oldid=24929630"