Stewards/Confirm/2021/Krd

Krd has resigned, and as such, his confirmation process was stopped by the Election Committee.. For the ElectCom, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Krd

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: de, en-3
Personal info: Dear community,
I would like to request renewal of my steward permissions.
After one year my activity was nearly as intended one year ago, i.e. a little bit of everything with some focus on OTRS tickets, where I created around 6000 answers in the Stewards queue, with is around 75% of the total amount. As this was quite a lot of work, my onwiki steward actions may appear a bit lower than they should.
Regarding my other roles, I think I'm still active above average in each of them, so I would like to ask for being confirmed.
Thank you, yours --Krd 08:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

বাংলা:

ভাষা:
ব্যক্তিগত তথ্যাদি: translation needed

Deutsch:

Sprachen:
Informationen zur Person: translation needed

español:

Idiomas:
Información personal: translation needed

magyar:

Nyelvek: de, en-3
Személyes információk: Kedves wikiközösség!
A helytartói jogosultságaim megújítását kérném.
Az éves aktivitásom nagyjából úgy alakult, ahogy azt egy éve terveztem: egy kicsi mindenből, némi fókusszal az OTRS-ügyeken. A helytartói listán kb. 6000 jegyet válaszoltam meg, ami a teljes mennyiség nagyjából 75%-a. Ez elég sok munka volt, ami magyarázat arra, hogy a wikiken az intézői műveleteim száma miért tűnhet kevesebbnek, mint ami elvárható.
A többi szerepkört nézve, úgy gondolom mindben átlag feletti az aktivitásom, ezért is szeretnék hosszabbítást kérni.
Köszönöm --Krd 2021. január 15., 08:49 (UTC)

italiano:

Lingue:
Informazioni personali: translation needed

Nederlands:

Taalvaardigheid:
Persoonlijke informatie: translation needed

русский:

Языки:
Личная информация: translation needed

Comments about Krd

Remove. Krd unfortunately is not suited to be part of the team. He has problems dealing with opposition to his actions, while also reverting fellow colleagues without talking to them. Has a track record of poor responses/handling of them on stewards OTRS, granting GIPBE for LTAs in multiple instances, and replying to the emails with templates that are not accurate for the incoming email. —Thanks for the fish! ^{talk•contribs} 14:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Tks4Fish and Praxidicae: Not that I don't believe you but this might be more convincing to other voters if it provided examples of public actions where possible. --Rs chen 7754 15:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - The sheer number of ipbe grants to ltas, for starters. Here is a recent one (of many) when an inappropriate GIPBE was granted following a CU block and was discussed extensively here. Praxidicae (talk) 15:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 14:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC), trustable long time wikipedian[reply]
Question Hi, the discussion at Requests for comment/Site-wide administrator abuse and WP:PILLARS violations on the Croatian Wikipedia has been pending a close for the entirety of the last term, and has not had any Steward significantly discuss with the participants its status, despite a couple of requests and the more recent passing of the meta-rfc policy. Could you explain why a) you and b) the Stewards as a whole, failed to close (and, as applicable, execute, it)? As a connected point to the most likely answers (too complicated, insufficiently clear remedies, not in remit, etc) could you clarify both why it/they apply but also why you/the Stewards didn't make that known to every participant and ask for specific actions taken to make it possible for the Stewards to act on it, despite the insane timescale? Nosebagbear (talk) 14:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Nosebagbear, thank you for the question. I think there are a lot of factors that come together. To keep it as short as possible: A case of such size likely should not be evaluated by a single steward, and stewards as a group failed to agree on any reasonable solution. In the end my personal opinion is that the discussion should be closed without a result, and perhaps started from the beginning, not least because the situation changed a bit since the discussion started. --Krd 15:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Krd: thank you for your quick answer - was there a reason the group didn't let the participants know that no closure was going to be forthcoming, along with some suggestions that might perhaps have helped a resolution be found as opposed to now having to recommence the whole thing and chuck a huge amount of editor hours? Nosebagbear (talk) 15:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not aware of any specific reason. --Krd 15:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral concerned about the lack of responding, as raised here. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove and stongly so. Krd lacks the competence necessary to be a steward. Praxidicae (talk) 15:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --IWI (talk) 15:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. Per Tks4Fish. --Galahad (sasageyo!)^(esvoy) 16:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Per Tks4Fish and Praxidicae. SQL ^{Query me!} 16:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Too many significant concerns to support. Miniapolis 16:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I wrote this when opposing your 2020 Steward candidature: "I felt you as someone who would struggle a bit in this role.". Sadly, it appears to be true. That being said, I am surprised that any steward is at risk to this extent, and hence hope you resolve the mistakes as Tks4Fish and Praxidicae pointed out. It's borderline oppose. Leaderboard (talk) 17:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Tks4Fish + this is not what I expect from a steward. 1989 (talk) 17:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From the Election Committee: Krd has resigned. Steward requests/Permissions#Krd@global. — regards, Revi 17:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Krd for your service, even if it ended this way. I think that the resignation shows integrity in light of the allegations made here, and I hope that you continue your involvement with the movement in other ways. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- +1.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- +2 Mardetanha (talk) 17:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- +3, I regret this step, regards -jkb- 17:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- agreed, thanks for your work. Stryn (talk) 18:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your service --DannyS712 (talk) 18:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your effort. --Uncitoyen^talk 18:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- --Rs chen 7754 20:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- , thanks for your service. Java Hurricane 02:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it shows "integrity", personally it felt like a bizarre rage-quit, unfortunately. Leaderboard (talk) 20:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your service. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 07:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. Unfortunately, he was not suited for the position, I thought. --痛心疾首 (talk) 03:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 06:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your work! --Johannnes89 (talk) 11:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for you work :) -- CptViraj (talk) 11:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep why not? --Agathenon (talk) 15:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Sorry, but i can't support you. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 21:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]