Stewards/Confirm/2021/Martin Urbanec

Martin Urbanec edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: cs, en-3
Personal info: Dear community,
This is my first confirmation as a Wikimedia Steward. As I still enjoy doing the stewardry work, I would like to continue in a next term. I don't have a dedicated area of stewardry work to focus on, and I always try to help wherever I can.
Outside of my steward role, I'm a Czech Wikipedia administrator, bureaucrat and checkuser. In the last year, my list of homewikis got expanded, as I'm now also a Wikidata administrator. I'm also active at Wikimedia Phabricator.
Disclaimer: I'm a Wikimedia Foundation contractor, working as a Czech Wikipedia community ambassador for the Growth team. For more details, see my staff userpage.

বাংলা:

ভাষা:
ব্যক্তিগত তথ্যাদি: translation needed

Deutsch:

Sprachen:
Informationen zur Person: translation needed

español:

Idiomas:
Información personal: translation needed

magyar:

Nyelvek: cs, en-3
Személyes információk: Tisztelt Közösség!
Ez az első tisztújítás, amin intézőként részt veszek. Mivel még mindig élvezem ezt a munkát, szívesen folytatnám a következő ciklusban is. Nincs kitüntetett szerepkör, amivel intézőként foglalkoznék, mindig ott próbálok segíteni, ahol tudok.
Az intézői szerepemen kívül adminisztrátora, bürökratája és IP-ellenőre vagyok a cseh Wikipédiának. A múlt évben admin lettem a Wikidatán is. Aktív vagyok a Phabricatoron is.
Fontos: A Wikimédia Alapítvány alkalmazásában állok, mint a cseh wikipédiásták nagykövete a Növekedési munkacsoport felé. További részletek a dolgozói lapomon.

italiano:

Lingue:
Informazioni personali: translation needed

Nederlands:

Taalvaardigheid:
Persoonlijke informatie: translation needed

русский:

Языки:
Личная информация: translation needed

Comments about Martin Urbanec edit

Keep, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Your first reconfirmation? Really? I thought you had already been a steward for several years, which is definitely a good sign. Naleksuh (talk) 14:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, active and helpful. Giraffer (talk) 14:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Praxidicae (talk) 14:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure, one of the most active, helpful stewards around. Highly competent, glad to have you on always. So kind to me when dispensing advices, what a wonderful steward. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, active, competent, helpful. Blablubbs (talk) 14:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 14:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The casting of aspersions regarding the CU checks below is disgusting. Legitimate accusations should be referred to the OC. --Rs chen 7754 01:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The one of most active steward in 2020. Has a good job in cross-wiki issues. --Uncitoyen^talk 14:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for your work in 2020!Zblace (talk) 14:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, really helpful. Stryn (talk) 14:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very helpful on IRC with locking LTAs and other blocks/locks I have requested. --IWI (talk) 14:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Yining Chen (Talk) 14:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Majavah (talk!) 14:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 14:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thank you for everything. Respectfully, --Yuri Krestinichev (talk) 14:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Arash ツ 14:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question Hi, the discussion at Requests for comment/Site-wide administrator abuse and WP:PILLARS violations on the Croatian Wikipedia has been pending a close for the entirety of the last term, and has not had any Steward significantly discuss with the participants its status, despite a couple of requests and the more recent passing of the meta closure of rfc policy. Could you explain why a) you and b) the Stewards as a whole, failed to close (and, as applicable, execute, it)? As a connected point to the most likely answers (too complicated, insufficiently clear remedies, not in remit, etc) could you clarify both why it/they apply but also why you/the Stewards didn't make that known to every participant and ask for specific actions taken to make it possible for the Stewards to act on it, despite the insane timescale? Nosebagbear (talk) 15:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Amanda (aka DQ) 15:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active, trusted and no concerns from me. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | enwiki} 15:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mehman 97 15:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep easy to talk to, kind and overall extremely helpful. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 15:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Robins7 (talk) 15:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Saroj Uprety (talk) 15:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --ToprakM ^✉ 16:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trusted user --Jan Myšák (talk) 16:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ミラP@Miraclepine 16:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Absolutely, no concerns. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SQL ^{Query me!} 16:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 1989 (talk) 17:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 17:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 17:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ented (talk) 18:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Barkeep49 (talk) 18:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Helpful; no concerns. ネイ (talk) 18:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep KevinL (aka L235 · t) 18:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — xaosflux ^Talk 19:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Definitely. --Count Count (talk) 21:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Luke 081515 22:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Hell, no! It is simply impossible to treat 30.000 CU (!!!!) within the scope of our rules during this time. Even if you convert that to days, there are more than 80 (!!!) daily. How should that work responsibly? Many other critical things also got through to me. In the position completely untenable. 30,000 CU are misuse of this tool. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 23:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Marcus Cyron I would like to explain why the number is so high. Right now, global locks do not have any autoblock-like mechanism, like it exists for local blocks (this was suggested several times in community wishlist, but still is not implemented). To prevent spambots and vandalbots from simply creating another account, locked accounts are usually CU'ed at loginwiki, to globally block the IP. In the last year, I locked thousands of spambots, and blocked thousands of heavily abused IPs, thanks to LWCU. Without CU'ing the spambots, it would not be possible, and they would probably just bot-create another account and continue their vandalism. Martin Urbanec (talk) 00:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 00:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]
Keep Thanks for all your great work --Superpes15 (talk) 00:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - highly active and helpful. – Ajraddatz (talk) 00:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Java Hurricane 03:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. One of the most active stewards in 2020. Helpful in all areas and competent. No concerns. Meiræ 03:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 04:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Awesome. Legoktm (talk) 06:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose On Czech Wikipedia he randomly checks IPs of users who did nothing to have their IPs checked.--Auvajs (talk) 06:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- How do you know if you are not a checkuserer there? --MF-W 01:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - @MF-Warburg: See this, only 1 of 4 arbiters agreed his CU check was OK.--Auvajs (talk) 14:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Mtarch11 (talk) 07:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the most active and helpful stewards. --Sîmbotin (talk) 08:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jack Frost (talk) 08:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mirinano (talk) 09:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 09:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Johannnes89 (talk) 11:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ammarpad (talk) 14:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - because of problematic behavior on Czech wiki to me. -- Karelj (talk) 16:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--باسم (talk) 17:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Michel Bakni (talk) 17:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sgd. —Hasley 18:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--evrifaessa ❯❯❯ talk 18:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted, competent, and responsive. Thank you for your service!! Waggie (talk) 20:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mirer (talk) 00:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very helpful and prompt! --Ivi104 (talk) 00:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geonuch (talk) 02:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral.--MCC214 #ex umbra in solem 10:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, strong activity, keep going — NickK (talk) 13:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sun8908 (talk) 05:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Iluvatar (talk) 00:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Mautpreller (talk) 09:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC). I am not satisfied with the steward's answer to the huge number of CU conducted within one year. A mighty tool jeopardizing data protection should definitely not be used in this "mass production" form.[reply]
He's a long-standing sysadmin. He probably sees IP addresses scattered across production logs anyway. Except on Wikipedia the idea of IP address sensitivity is not that great in most organisations. People working in systems will see them all the time, and nobody really cares. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 21:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep definitelyAhmetlii (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Definitely keep. He is competent and helpful on the Czech wiki, where I edit and patrol most of the time. KPX8 (talk) 23:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Summer ... hier! (talk) 10:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC) see Marcus Cyron[reply]
Keep -- 94rain ^Talk 04:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Grüße vom Sänger ♫^(Reden) 08:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minorax (talk) 09:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Ghormon (talk) 10:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC) see Marcus Cyron[reply]
Keep --Lymantria (talk) 13:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Godihrdt (talk) 14:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC) Not with this CU record, it is neither necessary not possible to reach a point with 99 % of all spambots/vandalism accounts banned and the CU tool is to crack a nut with a sledgehammer…[reply]
Keep Of course! --Alaa :)..! 17:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nehaoua (talk) 23:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
All the way! Keep. -Em-mustapha ^{User | talk} 23:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 00:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --20041027 tatsu (talk) 02:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I find it kind of hard to believe that Martin Urbanec has only been a steward for a year (are we sure? Did someone double check?) considering the enormous amount of amazing work I've seen from them. Asartea ^Talk ^{(Enwiki Talk (preferred))} 13:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wim b 20:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Platonides (talk) 00:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --LexICon (talk) 01:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep-Manchiu (talk) 06:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Mark7747 (talk) 13:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Excellent work handling long-term abuse cases. — Newslinger talk 16:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Maestro Ivanković 19:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mykola7 (talk) 21:42, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, my only concern is for the user not to overburden themselves. --Base (talk) 23:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Q8j (talk/CA) 00:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Csigabi (talk) 12:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – My vote is not against Martin personally, he want help (and he do it), but I mean that he have too much function and in consequence of this he have too much power (and responsibility) in hands--F.ponizil (talk) 17:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Aspiriniks (talk) 06:13, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He made extraordinary effort in 2020. --Victor Trevor (talk) 13:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I like your explanation to 30 thousand CU question. Taivo (talk) 17:50, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep /Julle (talk) 20:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Faisal ^talk 05:18, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concern! chansey ^message? 13:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AVSmalnad77 ^talk 05:14, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Achim (talk) 19:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Don-kun (talk) 19:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AGK ■ 22:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Jules ^Talk 10:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jagro (talk) 14:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Darkhan 17:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Aŭdrea (talk) 17:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I mean that he have too much functions and in consequence of this he have too much power (and responsibility) in hands. Does not keep his promises (to have less functions). Also see Auvajs's comment. --Kusurija (talk) 20:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. 30,000 CU actions is invasive; the tool is clearly being misused as a hammer that makes every issue look like a nail to be struck with it. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 20:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Spicy (talk) 10:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. --Dostojewskij (talk) 22:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--May♡♡→♡℃※Talk 02:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. Sběratel funkci narušující svým špatným úsudkem soukromí editorů. --Lenka64 (talk) 10:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pedram^Talk 08:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 13:54, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In my opinion, the CU-related concerns aren't that important, and his explanation for them seems good. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 15:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~ Amory (u • t • c) 19:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –Davey2010^Talk 21:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 04:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ― ANKAN (talk) 05:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Cabayi (talk) 14:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: sounds like he's performing well on the Czech Wikipedia. ——SerialNumber54129 17:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The proposal to relax bot policy gave me a pause. Martin Urbanec is Czech. He should know very well that global bot JAnDbot is abused and stewards do nothing about it despite clear breach of current global bot rules. Relaxing bot rules without working safeguards further encourages abuse, the opposite of what stewards should do. — Robert Važan (talk) 05:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ahmad^talk 13:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 19:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DannyS712 (talk) 19:27, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The CU accusations seem blown out of proportion. The usage is heavily tracked not only by fellow stewards but any misuse would be subject to OC investigation. Martin is exceptionally active in his duties and therefore his overall activity across the board will be higher than others, I see it every day on-wiki and IRC. Which brings the other concern. It's clear that his work in other areas has not affected his ability to effectively perform as a steward. I can see some opposition if his other duties made his activity substantially lower or insufficient compared with his peers but it seems he is excelling. I am happy to vote to keep for this user. --Charitwo (talk) 20:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep DraconicDark (talk) 01:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nadzik (talk) 08:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sakretsu (炸裂) 11:00, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RadiX ∞ 12:46, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]