Уведомление о переводе: Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Toolkit/Discussion Coordinator RoleEdit

Здравствуйте, Ruslik0!

Вы получили это письмо, так как зарегистрировались на сайте «Meta» в качестве переводчика на следующий язык: русский. Страница Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Toolkit/Discussion Coordinator Role доступна для перевода. Вы можете перевести её здесь:

Приоритет этой страницы — средний.

Blocked IPEdit

my IP is a dynamic ip, i have no idea why it is locked, please unlock:

Editing from your IP address range (46.125.249.0/24) has been blocked (disabled) on all Wikimedia wikis until 09:27, 2 January 2020 by Ruslik0 (meta.wikimedia.org) for the following reason: Long-term abuse

This block began on 09:27, 2 January 2019

You can contact Ruslik0 to discuss the block and you may make unblock requests or file appeals at meta:Steward requests/Global. Your current IP address is 46.125.249.116. Please include all above details in any queries you make. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by 46.125.249.116 (talk)

Special:CentralAuth/IlDonPedroEdit

Hello, are you sure this is the LTA you stated? Does not seem to match their behaviour at all. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
14:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

It is likely at least. Ruslik (talk) 21:02, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Special:CentralAuth/Deniseglz1 makes me doubtful as well. Do you base these solely on CU evidence? Also cc @Schniggendiller. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
17:23, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Imho both are false positives. That’s not his style of "work". Regards --Schniggendiller (talk) 10:02, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Another. I suggest you unlock these accounts and consider account behaviour and not just CU data. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
19:47, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Special:CentralAuth/Nippon Tomodachi and Special:CentralAuth/Information Germany, again, very clearly do not match the LTA's patterns. Frankly I am entirely unimpressed by your lack of communication on this matter, especially given that it in the most direct way possible affects editors – newcomers who will almost certainly not get into the trouble of appealing any locks or even understand what exactly happened to their account, and who will not come back again. Stewards are trusted to hold themselves accountable for their actions, and you have been failing to do so for no less than a few months now. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
21:23, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Ruslik, can you comment on these please? Best, Vermont 🐿️ (talk) 23:34, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Уведомление о переводе: Wikimedia Foundation elections/2022/Announcement/Board voter emailEdit

Здравствуйте, Ruslik0!

Вы получили это письмо, так как зарегистрировались на сайте «Meta» в качестве переводчика на следующий язык: русский. Страница Wikimedia Foundation elections/2022/Announcement/Board voter email доступна для перевода. Вы можете перевести её здесь:

Приоритет этой страницы — высокий.


Hi all!

The community vote of this year's Board Elections are close. As always voter mails will be sent out. To invite as many community members as possible in their native tongue your help is very much appreciated. While there are already plenty of translations we would appreciate you to check for languages still missing and to contribute translations for these.

The mails are short, just a bit about two times 200 words, a few minutes of work.

Your support is very important as it helps communities to learn about the election and to cast their vote.

Best, Denis Barthel (WMF)

(Movement Strategy and Governance)

Мы были бы очень признательны за вашу помощь. Такие переводчики, как вы, помогают сделать сайт «Meta» подлинно многоязычным сообществом.

Вы можете поменять настройки оповещений.

Спасибо!

Координаторы переводов сайта «Meta»‎, 12:50, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Можете помочь?Edit

Меня заблокировали в русском викисловаре за злоупотребление несколькими учетными записями. Но злоупотребления не было. Когда я создал новую учетку, я указал в ней свои старые и перестал ими пользоваться. Других нарушений у меня нет. Я обращался к заблокировавшему меня администратору здесь User talk:Bookvaedina#Making signs, здесь User talk:Bookvaedina#Я в ужасе и здесь User talk:Bookvaedina#Консенсус, так как не могу писать в русском викисловаре. Результата нет. Он создал консенсус https://ru.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%8C:%D0%9E%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%8B#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%83%D1%81_%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2 но в нем создается впечатление, что я другой участник. В консенсусе никто не реагирует. Помогите пожалуйста. Making signs (talk) 04:50, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Уведомление о переводе: Global rightsEdit

Здравствуйте, Ruslik0!

Вы получили это письмо, так как зарегистрировались на сайте «Meta» в качестве переводчика на следующий язык: русский. Страница Global rights доступна для перевода. Вы можете перевести её здесь:



Global rights is a useful page that has information about global user rights. Kindly help to translate them into your language.

Мы были бы очень признательны за вашу помощь. Такие переводчики, как вы, помогают сделать сайт «Meta» подлинно многоязычным сообществом.

Вы можете поменять настройки оповещений.

Спасибо!

Координаторы переводов сайта «Meta»‎, 14:50, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

HelpEdit

Greetings @Ruslik0

How are you?

Posted this request more than 14 days ago but no final decision is being made yet for the user.Is it okay if I remove that post? Note: I am not the user who need rights but posted on behalf of the user/community.Thank you. ~~~ Tumbuka Arch (talk) 11:39, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Question on how things work hereEdit

Good day, Ruslik, I am a user from the German wikipedia and I'm currently doing research on a user account which may have erraneously received a global ban.

On Aug 22, 2018 a request was placed on the Steward request page on Aug 22, 2018 by German admin Schniggendiller [1] to impose a global ban, among others, on the account "Franziska Bracharz" due to this account allegedly being a sock puppet of an account which was banned globally earlier. You worked on the request the next day. However, an user who claimed to be Franziska Brachart requested yesterday to bei unbanned. I found that the original account had never done a single edit, and the account name is also not typical für the sock puppets of the account which was banned earlier on [2] . So maybe an error was made here, and that's what I'm doing research on.

My request is not for you to remove the ban since I'm not authorised to do so. My question is: Is it true that if a request is made to award a global ban to an account which is alleged to be a sock puppet of an account with an earlier global ban no proof is required to be forwarded to the stewards that the account in question really is a sock puppet of that account and that you are not required to research whether this is actually true?

Thanks in advance! Maxl (talk) 13:17, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

With Avoided socks I always user checkuser tool to verify that that the account in question is at least consistent with being a sock of Avoided. So, I think an error is unlikely. In addition it is strange that a user who made no edits whatsoever requested an unblock 4 years later. It is much simpler to create a new account. Ruslik (talk) 20:31, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
And that works with a user account which was created 5 years after the block of Avoided and who has not made a single edit on any of the projects? --Maxl (talk) 20:58, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
@Maxl did you read my statement at de:WP:Sperrprüfung/Archiv/2022/September#Benutzer:Franziska Bracharz (erl.)? Franziska Bracharz created a couple of new user accounts [3][4] which are clearly Avoided sockpuppets. Looking at these account creations, there is no doubt – even without CU evidence – about Franziska Bracharz being Avoided.
Answering your question about CU: The account has not made a single edit, but every log entry can be used by checkusers to compare CU data with publicly known IPs of Avoided and of course with previous CU data (e.g. by looking at CU logs or CU wiki) Johannnes89 (talk) 07:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
@User:Johannes89: Yes, of course I read the whole of your fist link. That's what got me doing a lot of research on the accout of Franziska Bracharz because most of the links in the discussions were not consistent with the comments in the text. Your link for example simply shows whe Admin Jivee Blue banned Franziska Bracharz. The "Tschechenböller" accounts he banned at the same time were, however, not registered at the same time. Franziska Bracharz was registered on August 3, 10 days earlier while the other accounts Jivee blue banned at the same time wwere banned immediately after having been registered. Also, I found that the account "Franziska Bracharz" is an untypical name for the accounts Avoided used to register. Also, the account had not made any edits at all which would mean that there is no way of comparing the "diction" of the account with Avoided's, as one of the commentators said - there is none. [5] Also, one of the commentators said that the global ban was done due to "Avoided" on meta.wikimedia. Thereofore I ventured here and found the above mentioned request of Schniggendiller which told me that the path lead back to the German wikipedia. I also found the discussion regarding the global ban of Avoided. I wanted some more information on procedures and therefore I asked User:Rusliko who had executed the ban (I didn't ask you, by the way; how did you find this discussion?) and who already told me that he did a CU (though none appears to have done on the German Wikipedia; I checked the CU logs (three large parts) for Avoided and didn't find "Franziska Bracharz" in them, nor did I find a CUA for her in special) As you may have read above, Ruslik told me he made a CU before banning "Franziska Brecharz" globally. So you see, my question to Ruslik was simply part of a big research on this case. The CU question was to be me final one since I was unsure whether a CU could still be consistent 5 years after the ban of the original account due to dynamic IPs. After that I would have considered the matter closed. Your interference was unnecessary. (and sorry, @User:Rusliko, for "spamming" your discussion page. I thought I should explain to Johannes89 in depth why I asked you in the first place since he could not know what research I had done before contacting you.) --Maxl (talk) 11:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The checkuser was performed on loginwiki. Ruslik (talk) 20:43, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
@Maxl what I was trying to say is, that there is evidence, which you can't see, because the log entrys [6] were deleted. If you had doubts about my reasoning, I would have been happy to share further details:
  • 2018-08-14T21:16:56 Benutzerkonto Tschechienböller 13 wurde von Franziska Bracharz erstellt ‎
  • 2018-08-14T21:16:47 Benutzerkonto Tschechienböller 12 wurde von Franziska Bracharz erstellt ‎
  • 2018-08-14T21:16:40 Benutzerkonto Tschechienböller 11 wurde von Franziska Bracharz erstellt ‎
  • 2018-08-14T21:16:33 Benutzerkonto Tschechienböller 10 wurde von Franziska Bracharz erstellt ‎
  • 2018-08-14T21:16:25 Benutzerkonto Tschechienböller 9 wurde von Franziska Bracharz erstellt
  • 2018-08-03T12:56:03 Benutzerkonto Franziska Bracharz (Diskussion | Beiträge) wurde erstellt
By the way: This is by no means the first time, that he used seemingly innocent account names (e.g. User:Nadja Peters, User:Angelo Ferich or User:Peter Lugov), all of them CU-confirmed.
How did I find this discussion: As you can see from my contribution list, I'm quite active on Meta. Since I'm fighting (crosswiki) vandalism, I put all user talk pages of stewards & admins on my watchlist. --Johannnes89 (talk) 21:11, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Thank you both for your informations, now I'm satisfied. Of course I can't see deleted log entries. I didn't know such entries were deleted at all. I learnt a lot these days, first through my own research and then through your kind help. Thank you!--Maxl (talk) 22:01, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

PecyhEdit

Hi, you globally locked Pecyh (talk · contribs). Pcdx (talk · contribs) is a en:WP:DUCK. See here. Kacamata (talk) 18:54, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Ok. Ruslik (talk) 20:51, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Уведомление о переводе: Universal Code of Conduct/Revised enforcement guidelines/Announcement/Consultation CloseEdit

Здравствуйте, Ruslik0!

Вы получили это письмо, так как зарегистрировались на сайте «Meta» в качестве переводчика на следующий язык: русский. Страница Universal Code of Conduct/Revised enforcement guidelines/Announcement/Consultation Close доступна для перевода. Вы можете перевести её здесь:

Приоритет этой страницы — средний.


Мы были бы очень признательны за вашу помощь. Такие переводчики, как вы, помогают сделать сайт «Meta» подлинно многоязычным сообществом.

Вы можете поменять настройки оповещений.

Спасибо!

Координаторы переводов сайта «Meta»‎, 02:16, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Перенос прав бота на новый аккаунтEdit

Здравствуйте! Не могли бы Вы перенести права бота с на? Можно снять права старого бота в Чеченской Википедии! Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 19:59, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

  Done Ruslik (talk) 20:45, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposal global blocking 120.188.0.0/17Edit

Please block the IP range 120.188.0.0/17 because it was used for adding fake information across Wikimedia projects as depicted like this..... Thanks..... 2001:448A:1020:4E9C:3DC1:1603:F9AE:773E 01:17, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Requests for comment/Blatant arbitrariness and abuse on the part of the Arbitration Committee of the Russian Wikipedia, harassment in Wikimedia projectsEdit

I think this RFC, started by Motin, should be closed too. MBH (talk) 10:25, 3 December 2022 (UTC)