User:-revi/All SE 2021 Votes

What is this?????

This is my Operations Center to check for weird things in SE Vote zone. I see this page to see all Vote status and comments holistically.

REFRESH!


Warning

The 2021 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

AmandaNPEdit

  • Languages: en-N, fr-4, es-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    I am AmandaNP (formerly DeltaQuad). I have been an Ombudsperson for the past 2 years - which I am stepping down from - and have been a CheckUser since 2012 and an oversighter since 2014 on the English Wikipedia. I became a bureaucrat in spring 2019. I also served on the Arbitration Committee for 4 years. I also develop for UTRS and w:WP:ACC which are becoming global projects. Most of my work over the past year has been related to blocking lock evading sockpuppets and then having to notify a steward to lock them. I also have engaged in crosswiki help for checkusers to help determine results. Beyond that, I have handled the English Wikipedia IPBE queue, which receives a lot of requests passed on by stewards. Lastly, I have been actively engaged in helping stewards form proxy blocks and remove the ones that are incorrectly blocked. So most of my work as a steward (if elected) would be CheckUser, Oversight, IP Block exemptions (and other permission requests), global locks and blocks. While I understand some may be concerned by my lack of crosswiki activity, I've been dealing with many smaller communities for the past 2 years on the Ombuds Commission. I hope that my work can help translate into the steward role. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 20:15, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2021/Questions#AmandaNP


  YesEdit

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Admittedly I have my reservations (as hinted at in the questions) but on balance I think they have enough experience (both collaborative and in different roles) to where I think they will be a positive for the steward team. Rschen7754 13:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  2. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Very capable steward candidate, and this is backed up with the answers to the questions, including the ones set for all candidates and the ones I set specifically for her. The relative lack of crosswiki experience can be easily made up in this case, and hence she gets my vote. Leaderboard (talk) 14:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  3. Tks4Fish (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Definitely yes. Amanda is going to be a great asset to the team. Even if she doesn't have that much crosswiki contributions, she is always helping us with crosswiki abusers and LTAs. She's a very experienced checkuser which is a great help for us, plus a great developer, having developed UTRS and being part of ACC. She has my full trust and support. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 14:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  4. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   TonyBallioni (talk) 14:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  5. Blablubbs (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Blablubbs (talk) 14:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  6. Miraclepine (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Long overdue, so sure, why not? And also, the IAR incident was more of a one-off thing. ミラP@Miraclepine 14:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  7. -akko (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   (`・ω・´) (talk) 14:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  8. Zblace (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Zblace (talk) 14:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  9. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   Although I tend to agree with Herbythyme when it comes to cross-wiki experience, I think she will still be a net positive if we take in consideration her overall experience with LTA and mostly known abusers. She is also very useful is sensitive checkuser issues. RadiX 14:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  10. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021   I trust Amanda will be a net positive to the steward team, and I'll be happy for having her on the team. She's a functionary and requests steward attention regularly, and I don't see a reason to oppose. Good luck, Amanda. Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  11. Savh (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   Seemingly competent, experienced with some steward-related duties. Savhñ 14:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  12. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021   Absolutely no concerns, Amanda is highly experienced in the technical aspects of stewardry (holding CU, crat, arb, ombuds on their homewiki) and that is more than enough for me. Amanda is also a great communicator and I think we would be lucky to have her! Praxidicae (talk) 14:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  13. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   I would prefer to see more xwiki experience, but the candidate is a competent user who will be able to figure out the role and not mess anything up. Experience with the OC is a plus. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  14. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Stryn (talk) 14:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  15. LuchoCR (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   LuchoCR (talk) 15:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  16. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021   CptViraj (talk) 15:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  17. Sotiale (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Sotiale (talk) 15:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  18. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Candidate is competent and the answers to the questions are satisfying. Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  19. Dylsss (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Dylsss (talk) 15:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  20. User456541 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   –User456541 15:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  21. ElHef (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 15:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  22. Barkeep49 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Barkeep49 (talk) 15:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  23. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Competent and will probably be a fine steward. Trijnsteltalk 16:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  24. Galahad (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Very capable. Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 16:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  25. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Qualified candidate; no concerns. Miniapolis 16:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  26. Giraffer (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Giraffer (talk) 16:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  27. Vermont (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Low direct cross-wiki activity, but an immense amount of experience with global issues, especially from their time on the OC. I have no doubt Amanda would be a great steward. Vermont (talk) 16:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  28. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Can be trusted with the tools, would be a positive addition. Also per experience with CU and OC. LGTM DannyS712 (talk) 16:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  29. Superpes15 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Superpes15 (talk) 16:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  30. GeneralNotability (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Absolutely, capable and trustworthy. I agree that Amanda isn't the most active xwiki, but I believe her experience as an Ombud will be a great contribution to the steward team. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  31. Kizule (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Kizule (talk) 16:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  32. SQL (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   SQLQuery me! 16:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  33. Majavah (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Majavah (talk!) 16:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  34. Aranya (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Aranya (talk) 17:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  35. Vit Koz (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Vit; talk 17:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  36. M-Mustapha (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Em-mustapha User | talk 17:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  37. Kb03 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   I've had nothing but positive interactions, would serve the Wikimedia community well as a steward. Kb03 (talk) 17:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  38. 1989 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   For sure. 1989 (talk) 17:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  39. Susann Schweden (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Susann Schweden (talk) 18:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  40. Racconish (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021  . — Racconish💬 18:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  41. CAPTAIN RAJU (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  42. L235 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   KevinL (aka L235 · t) 18:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  43. Mz7 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Mz7 (talk) 18:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  44. BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   BrunoBoehmler (talk) 18:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  45. Perryprog (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Perryprog (talk) 19:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  46. Kusurija (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Kusurija (talk) 20:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  47. P,TO 19104 (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Lots of expirence at enwiki. P,TO 19104 (talk) 21:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  48. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   ToBeFree (talk) 21:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  49. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Legoktm (talk) 21:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  50. History DMZ (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Amanda's diverse portfolio makes for a candidate especially suitable for stewardship. History DMZ (HQ) (wire) 22:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  51. Stwalkerster (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   stwalkerster (talk) 22:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  52. DrTrumpet (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Enough Experience to collect more experience DrTrumpet (talk) 23:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  53. Leijurv (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Leijurv (talk) 23:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  54. The Earwig (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   I trust her. I think the reaction to the recent IAR action, while based in a reasonable fear of IAR being used inappropriately, is overblown given what happened. — The Earwig ⟨talk⟩ 23:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  55. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Ombuds experience is an asset. dwf² 01:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  56. JavaHurricane (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021  Sysop and bureaucrat, former arb at enwiki, has been on Ombuds also. Crosswiki contribs could have been better, but those are not really concerning to me. The IAR fear is rather overblown I think. JavaHurricane 01:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  57. Mirisa56 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Mirisa56 (talk) 03:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  58. Elliot321 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   No concerns for me, they've been helpful at enwiki. Elliot321 (talk) 04:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  59. Krinkle (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Krinkle (talk) 04:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  60. 游魂 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Yo Yan 06:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  61. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   per Tks4Fish and RadiX. Limited cross-wiki experience is a downside, but in all other aspects it's almost a perfect candidate. Meiræ 06:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  62. AfroThundr3007730 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   — AfroThundr (u · t · c) 07:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  63. Mtarch11 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Mtarch11 (talk) 08:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  64. Jack Frost (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Jack Frost (talk) 08:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  65. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2021   cyrfaw (talk) 08:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  66. Lt2818 (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2021   Lt2818 (talk) 08:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  67. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  68. Asartea (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2021   Asartea Talk (Enwiki Talk (preferred)) 13:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  69. Aca (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Aca (talk) 13:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  70. Joseywales1961 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Joseywales1961 (talk) 13:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  71. Girth Summit (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Long-time trusted contributor GirthSummit (blether) 14:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  72. นคเรศ (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Nakaret (talk) 15:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  73. Doug Weller (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   I've known Amanda for quite a while and served on the English ArbCom with her. I'm sure she'll do an excellent job. Doug Weller (talk) 16:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  74. Michel Bakni (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Michel Bakni (talk) 17:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  75. باسم (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   باسم (talk) 17:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  76. Hasley (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Sgd. —Hasley 17:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  77. Imetsia (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Imetsia (talk) 18:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  78. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   I also consider the IAR matter to be overblown. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 18:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  79. SoWhy (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   SoWhy 19:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  80. Betseg (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Betseg (talk) 19:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  81. Woody (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Woody (talk) 19:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  82. Waggie (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Clearly qualified to use the tools and has the long-term trust of the community. Waggie (talk) 20:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  83. Comte0 (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Comte0 (talk) 20:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  84. Patrik L. (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Patrik L. (talk) 22:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  85. Sakretsu (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Sakretsu (炸裂) 22:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  86. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Dostojewskij (talk) 23:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  87. Spicy (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Spicy (talk) 23:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  88. Krzysiek 123456789 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Krzysiek 123456789 (talk) 00:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  89. Wiwik P (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Wiwik P (talk) 01:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  90. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   FASTILY 01:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  91. Blue Sonic (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Blue Sonic (talk) 02:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  92. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Esteban16 (talk) 02:19, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  93. Maynich (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Maynich (talk) 05:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  94. Enjoyer of World (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Enjoyer of World (talk) 05:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  95. Mirer (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Mirer (talk) 05:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  96. MJL (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   AmandaNP is pretty trustworthy. –MJLTalk 05:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  97. Cryberghost (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   He/she had a global experience as an ombudsman. Also active on home-wiki. --👻Cryberghost 06:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  98. TSK201911 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   TSK201911 (talk) 07:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  99. Kocgs (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Kocgs (talk) 08:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  100. MarioJump83 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   MarioJump83! 08:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  101. ItsPugle (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2021   ItsPugle (talk) 10:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  102. Gripweed (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021  --Gripweed (talk) 10:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  103. Firestar464 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Amanda knows the ropes. Why not elect her? Firestar464 (talk) 11:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  104. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   After much consideration, I have decided to support. I think they will be an asset to the community. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  105. NickK (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   AmandaNP is very qualified, has relevant experience, and while the cross-wiki experience could be better, I think she would be a good addition to the steward team. I see mentions of an enwiki IAR conflict but I don't see it as a huge issue — NickK (talk) 12:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  106. Diannaa (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Diannaa (talk) 14:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  107. Tucoxn (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2021   - tucoxn\talk 15:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  108. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Daniuu (talk) 16:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  109. Meneerke bloem (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 16:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  110. John M Wolfson (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   John M Wolfson (talk) 17:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  111. SK2242 (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2021   experienced and knowledgeable. SK2242 (talk) 17:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  112. NANöR (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   NANöR (talk) 20:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  113. Packa (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Packa (talk) 20:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  114. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Jusjih (talk) 23:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  115. Impartial just (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Impartial just (talk) 01:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  116. جار الله (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   جار الله (talk) 02:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  117. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2021   Carlotm (talk) 03:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  118. Roller26 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Roller26 (talk) 06:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  119. Jni (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   jni (talk) 07:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  120. Stigfinnare (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Stigfinnare (talk) 09:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  121. Whiteguru (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Competent and will likely to be a fine steward Whiteguru (talk) 09:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  122. Nosebagbear (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Minor negatives seem outweighed by significant positives Nosebagbear (talk) 10:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  123. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   – Ammarpad (talk) 10:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  124. Kudpung (Eligible, checked by Perryprog)2021   Kudpung (talk) 12:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  125. PoetVeches (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   PoetVeches (talk) 13:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
    Dreamy Jazz (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Dreamy Jazz talk to me | enwiki 13:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  126. Veracious (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Veracious (talk) 14:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  127. Feroze Ahmad 2 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Feroze Ahmad 2 (talk) 15:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  128. 94rain (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   94rain Talk 16:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  129. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Hiàn (talk) 19:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  130. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021    Klaas `Z4␟` V:  21:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  131. Iluvatar (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Iluvatar (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  132. Awesome Aasim (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Trusted Admin. Aasim 01:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  133. Coffeeandcrumbs (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  134. Sashatrk (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Sashatrk (talk) 04:54, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  135. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Cbyd (talk) 09:55, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  136. L293D (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   L293D ( • ) 13:09, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
       Kamilalibhat (Not eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)  . Kamilalibhat (talk) 15:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  137. موسى (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   MUSA (talk) موسى (talk) 15:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  138. Chz (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Chz (talk) 16:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  139. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Centaur271188 (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  140. InsaneHacker (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   My guiding principle for granting user rights is whether the user needs the tools, and whether they can be trusted with them. I believe both points are fulfilled here. I don't consider the bureaucrat incident a sufficient indication to the contrary. InsaneHacker (talk) 17:30, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  141. Eatcha (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Eatcha (talk) 17:45, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  142. Wim b (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Wim b 19:33, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  143. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   ArdiPras95 (talk) 21:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  144. MusikAnimal (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   I have worked with AmandaNP closely in the past and can attest to her fine judgement. She has extensive experience in administrative roles dating back nearly a decade or more. I am thrilled to see her candidacy here and I think she would bring a lot to the team. MusikAnimal talk 22:09, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  145. KPX8 (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   KPX8 (talk) 23:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  146. Johannes Maximilian (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Johannes Maximilian (talk) 00:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  147. Alexdoherty4 (Eligible, checked by 94rain)2021   Alexdoherty4 (talk) 03:11, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  148. Yahya (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   —Yahya (talkcontribs.) 07:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  149. Nightfury (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Nightfury (talk) 12:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  150. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 14:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  151. 20041027 tatsu (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   20041027 tatsu (talk) 15:01, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  152. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Vituzzu (talk) 17:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  153. Juan90264 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Juan90264 (talk) 17:31, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  154. علاء (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Will be a great addition to the steward team --Alaa :)..! 17:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  155. Britishfinance (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Britishfinance (talk) 17:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  156. Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Filipović Zoran (talk) 19:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  157. Zezen (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   A competent candidate: the recent resysop incident seems minor. Zezen (talk) 21:24, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  158. CanadianToast (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   CanadianToast (talk) 21:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  159. Nehaoua (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Nehaoua (talk) 22:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  160. DENAMAX (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   DENAMAX (talk) 22:43, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  161. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  162. Cairo2k18 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Cairo2k18(talk)(contribs) 06:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  163. Hosseinronaghi (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Hossein (talk) 07:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  164. Ponor (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Ponor (talk) 07:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  165. Gobonobo (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   gobonobo + c 08:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  166. Opsylac (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Opsylac (talk) 09:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  167. Érico (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Cross-wiki experience is far from perfect, but the length experience as editor and diversity are decisive to me. Érico (talk) 11:26, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  168. FeydHuxtable (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   FeydHuxtable (talk) 16:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  169. Alfie (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Absolutely. -- Thanks, Alfie. enwiki 18:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  170. Bff (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Bff (talk) 19:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  171. Mykola7 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Mykola7 (talk) 20:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  172. EVinente (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   EVinente (talk) 21:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  173. AntiCompositeNumber (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:26, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  174. Dorian Gray Wild (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Good luck! Dgw (talk) 23:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  175. JJMC89 (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Absolutely — JJMC89(T·C) 06:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  176. Ddxfx (Eligible, checked by -akko)2021   — Ddxfx 09:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  177. Moheen (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   No concerns for me. ~Moheen (keep talking) 10:06, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  178. Chicdat (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   No issues - why not? Chicdat (talk) 12:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  179. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Jon Harald Søby (talk) 12:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  180. Tomasz Bladyniec (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   <optional comments>. Tomasz Bladyniec (talk) 12:47, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  181. Anarchyte (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  182. Fanchb29 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Fanchb29 (talk) 17:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  183. Maestro Ivanković (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Maestro Ivanković 17:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  184. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   ~Cybularny Speak? 20:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  185. Luizpuodzius (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   no concerns! Dr. LooLets talk about it 20:17, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  186. Luensu1959 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   I am in favor! Luensu1959 (talk) 21:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  187. DraconicDark (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   DraconicDark (talk) 22:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  188. Bilorv (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   An extraordinarily talented and accomplished candidate. The excessive focus on a recent action distracts from the long-time excellent behaviour of the user; even if we were to accept the premise that the action is mistaken then we need evidence that it is part of a long-term pattern or some larger behavioural issue, as you can't edit for over a decade without some bad actions. — Bilorv (talk) 22:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  189. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   MZaplotnik(talk) 00:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  190. Elizium23 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Elizium23 (talk) 01:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  191. Sj (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Quadruple yes. –SJ talk  03:13, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  192. JN Dela Cruz (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   JN Dela Cruz (talk) 09:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  193. Sergey Tsvigun (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Sergey Tsvigun (talk) Having a vast experience on serving at Wikipedia in different roles, she is able to perform steward duties effectively. 11:45, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  194. Юрко Градовський (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Юрко Градовський (talk) 13:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  195. Hadrianus (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Hadrianus (talk) 14:19, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  196. Bencemac (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Bencemac (talk) 14:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  197. Jmbranum (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Jmbranum (talk) 18:26, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  198. Paradise Chronicle (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Support, experienced.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  199. Zabia (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Zabia (talk) 08:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  200. DarwIn (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   - Darwin Ahoy! 15:13, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  201. Mfb (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   mfb (talk) 20:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  202. فيصل (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Faisal talk 05:23, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  203. Nawaraj Ghimire (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Competent and capable Nawaraj Ghimire (talk) 05:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  204. Malikaveedu (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Malikaveedu (talk) 05:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  205. Saroj Uprety (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Saroj Uprety (talk) 05:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  206. chansey (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   I think AmandaNP is enough experienced for being a steward according to his/her contributions. Yes. chansey message? 13:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  207. Teles (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   A falta de atividade cross-wiki é de fato algo que fala contra a escolha, mas a candidata possui conhecimento e prática sólidos em áreas diretamente ligadas ao trabalho dos Stewards e acho que isso deve pesar mais. —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 14:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  208. Geraki (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021   Geraki TL 19:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  209. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Shizhao (talk) 01:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  210. JamesLucas (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   JamesLucas (talk) 02:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  211. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Personally, in view of his comments and his counters (Wikiscan and Xtools), Amanda has the skills with stewards. Good luck. DePlusJean (talk) 11:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  212. Eraevsky (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Eraevsky (обс.) 13:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  213. LuK3 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  214. CaptainEek (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Extremely capable. I do not worry about having too many roles, I would worry more about someone with less roles and less experience. Has she made some mistakes? Yes, and we all have. None of them are disqualifying and her positives far outweigh any issues. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 23:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
       Storkk (Not eligible, checked by Jianhui67)   Storkk (talk) 10:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  215. Tolly4bolly (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   T4B (talk) 11:46, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  216. DutchDevil (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2021   (talk) 17:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  217. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Gereon K. (talk) 23:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  218. GrandCelinien (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   GrandCelinien (talk) 08:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  219. Jules* (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   — Jules Talk 10:13, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  220. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021   Rzuwig 11:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  221. Ed6767 (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Ed6767 (talk) 15:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  222. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Darkhan 17:34, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  223. Cwmhiraeth (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  224. SMcCandlish (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021    — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  20:14, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  225. David Fuchs (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Impressed with Amanda's efforts all times I have crossed paths with them. David Fuchs (talk) 20:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  226. Ssstela (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Ssstela (talk) 21:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  227. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   *Youngjin (talk) 04:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  228. CommanderWaterford (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  229. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Octahedron80 (talk) 09:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  230. Rashid Jorvee (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Rashid Jorvee (talk) 12:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  231. Tiputini (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2021   Tiputini (talk) 17:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
       MdsShakil (Not eligible, checked by Fitindia)  
  232. The Anome (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   A well respected and very capable Wikipedian, recommended without reservations The Anome (talk) 14:56, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  233. AVSmalnad77 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   --AVSmalnad77 talk 15:10, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  234. Steindy (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   --Steindy (talk) 20:15, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  235. Jessamyn (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Jessamyn (talk) 20:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  236. Arccosecant (Eligible, checked by -akko)2021   — csc-1 23:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  237. NK1406 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   NK1406 (talk) 01:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
    Bestoernesto (Verification pending)   Ciao • Bestoernesto 03:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC) --Ciao • Bestoernesto 04:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  238. Suvray (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Suvray (talk) 09:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  239. Santasa99 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Amanda would be only lady in this role at this time! s a n t a | t a l k | p i t 13:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  240. JLavigne508 (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   <always need to go back and clean things constantly>. JLavigne508 (talk) 13:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  241. Seewolf (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Harald Krichel (talk) 15:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  242. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   In regards to the Ivan situation - Everyone makes mistakes no one's perfect. Excellent admin on EN and would without a doubt make a great Steward here, –Davey2010Talk 17:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  243. Andrew nyr (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Andrew nyrtalkcontribs 20:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  244. User3749 (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   User3749 (talk) 04:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  245. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Ameisenigel (talk) 09:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  246. Amorymeltzer (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   The enwiki resysop thing is absolutely nothing issue. I do understand concerns about the lack of traditional x-wiki experience, but Amanda clearly has experience working with and understanding crosswiki communities. It's not what we usually see for stewards, but that doesn't mean it's not valuable. She has extensive experience at nearly every level, and is always thoughtful and considered. No concerns at all. ~ Amory (utc) 19:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  247. Coffins (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   Coffins (talk) 21:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  248. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   Dash77 (talk) 01:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  249. WikiAviator (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   WikiAviator (talk) 02:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  250. Guerillero (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Guerillero Parlez Moi 04:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
       VKG1985 (Not eligible, checked by ZabeMath)   VKG1985 (talk) 12:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  251. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   OlEnglish (Talk) 13:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  252. Mbrickn (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Mbrickn (talk) 13:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  253. Cabayi (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Cabayi (talk) 13:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  254. LilyKitty (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   LilyKitty (talk) 16:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  255. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Go for it. ——SerialNumber54129 17:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  256. Mrschimpf (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Mrschimpf (talk) 04:37, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  257. သူထွန်း (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   သူထွန်း (talk) 15:12, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  258. QuiteUnusual (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Nobody is perfect, AmandaNP though is good enough and will be a valuable addition to the team. QuiteUnusual (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  259. ZI Jony (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 16:11, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  260. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  261. Bradv (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   – bradv🍁 20:00, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  262. கி.மூர்த்தி (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   கி.மூர்த்தி (talk) 05:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  263. Robert McClenon (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Robert McClenon (talk) 05:19, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  264. Ahmad252 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Ahmadtalk 13:33, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  265. Bachounda (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Bachounda (talk) 14:15, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  266. Masti (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   masti <talk> 18:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  267. Charitwo (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Exemplary candidate. Performs well as a user, admin, and functionary. Will do well as a steward. Charitwo (talk) 22:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  268. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Novak Watchmen (talk) 23:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  269. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   --Marshallsumter (talk) 02:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
  270. Nadzik (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Nadzik (talk) 08:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
  271. DavidDelaune (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Contributor can be trusted. DavidDelaune (talk) 09:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
  272. Base (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   --Base (talk) 12:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

  NoEdit

  1. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Inadequate cross wiki experience for a cross wiki role Herby talk thyme 14:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  2. Naleksuh (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Well, someone had to mention it. AmandaNP recently resysopped a user in violation of policy, ignoring local policies. That is concerning enough on its own-- if a user cannot even follow policies on their home wiki for strict crat work, how can they be trusted to when venturing onto other wikis as a steward? But I could have ignored this, had it been handled properly. Humans make mistakes. But your response to it in questions seems like you don't even think it is a problem. And that is bad. Naleksuh (talk) 14:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  3. ImprovedWikiImprovment (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   There is no denying that Amanda has the knowledge and expertise to act well as a steward, but their cross-wiki activity is not enough for me. I don't believe their work as an ombudsperson or OTRS helper is enough for me to support someone being elected to a global role. A steward should be at least somewhat experienced in editing a variety of wikis, even ones where they don't speak the language. If they became more active, I would happily support them next year. --IWI (talk) 14:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  4. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Seems capable, but low cross-wiki experience gives me pause. MF-W 14:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  5. AGK (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Sorry – you obviously mean well, but you have been too error-prone. As well as judgement and care, reliable availability is obviously a problem too. I do appreciate and thank you for the work you're doing in existing roles. AGK ■ 14:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  6. Nguyentrongphu (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Using IAR as an excuse for going against policy (in non-emergency situation) is a recipe for disaster. I can't trust this user to be a good steward (who has to follow policy strictly) with this incident. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 14:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  7. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Knowledgeable person, but the IAR incident is too recent for me to ignore. Dolotta (talk) 14:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  8. Pppery (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   * Pppery * it has begun 17:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  9. Samuele2002 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Insufficient cross-wiki experience Samuele2002 (Talk!) 21:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  10. Gamaliel (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Per Naleksuh and AGK. Gamaliel (talk) 02:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  11. Nurtenge (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Insufficient work experience Nurtenge (talk) 07:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  12. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Relatively low cross-wiki experience and the recent resysop incidence. KPFC💬 11:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  13. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   not enough cross-wiki experience Johannnes89 (talk) 14:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  14. OhKayeSierra (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   OhKayeSierra (talk) 19:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  15. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2021   O.Koslowski (talk) 10:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  16. Sun8908 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Sun8908 (talk) 09:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  17. Lepricavark (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   per resysop incident. Lepricavark (talk) 22:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  18. Beaneater00 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   "Ombudsperson" Beaneater00 (talk) 12:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
    @Beaneater00: Could you please elaborate on the issue with the term "Ombudsperson"? Praxidicae (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
    @Praxidicae: Frankly I find that the term is ridiculous. The applicant is female; she could have said 'ombudswoman'. I don't think that this should disqualify her but the election is already in her favor and so I wanted to use my vote to make a point. Beaneater00 (talk) 16:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
    ElectCom member comment: Extended discussion around this topic has been moved to Talk:Stewards/Elections 2021/Votes/AmandaNP#Discussion for Beaneater00's comment. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 01:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  19. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   insufficient cross-wiki experience —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 16:34, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  20. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   SPQRobin (talk) 12:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  21. RandomCanadian (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Don't like bringing personal issues into this, but mistakenly blocking someone while (mis-?)using CU tools makes it hard for me to support this user with even more advanced permissions. Experience is clearly there, but errors such as my case and other incidents reported above are not what you would expect. RandomCanadian (talk) 02:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  22. Carsrac (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   There is more then the EN wikipedia and all answers are, but on EN we do it this way. So it is a very strong NO vote. Carsrac (talk) 08:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  23. Moneytrees (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   I'm truly sorry, but per AGK, Lepricavark, and RandomCanadian. I don't like the implications of this unblock and this interaction. Moneytrees (talk) 22:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
    Regarding the interaction, so? It was terse, perhaps, but "I don't want to weigh in" is a fine stance to take, especially given ArbCom unblocked. ~ Amory (utc) 19:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
    It didn't come off to me as "I don't want to weigh in". That's all I say. Moneytrees (talk) 19:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  24. Smallbones (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Too many mistakes. Aloof, unfriendly attitude, Has simply ignored established policy while on ArbCom, simp[y because she didn't like it. Smallbones (talk) 01:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  25. Sdrqaz (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   I am unfortunately concerned by the resysop incident. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  26. ProcrastinatingReader (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Partially resysop incident concerns and too many roles imo. But mainly I don’t really see any need here. The evidence of crosswikiness via work on the Ombuds commission is unconvincing. The OC is backlogged and closes like 4 cases per year iirc, and seems to be so inactive that they forget to fill out the activity reports half the time and AGK had to do it retrospectively for past terms. On the talk page an Ombud said that just one person does all the work gathering evidence on a particular case. So not really convinced that being on OC evidences anything, much less a transition to the steward role. Not in oppose solely because I have no concerns with Amanda’s overall competence and I think she has good communication skills which is important, but I still don’t see much prior evidence of capacity to be an effective steward, and I imagine that this request would be a snowing no if it were someone with less positions on enwiki. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 20:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
    Reluctantly moving to no. On reflection and mostly per AGK and Moneytrees, and because I think the support mostly rests on credentialism rather than the normal requirements/experience leading up to the steward role, and hence may lead to mistakes as a steward. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 02:31, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  27. AFBorchert (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   I would like to see more cross-wiki experience. AFBorchert (talk) 10:11, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  28. Draceane (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   per AGK and Camouflaged Mirage — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  29. Willbb234 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Recent resysoping incident is concerning. Also per AGK. Willbb234 (talk) 09:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  30. Mahedi181 (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Insufficient work experience! Mahedi Hasan (talk) 11:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  31. Taivo (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   You have no crosswiki activity. If we take these wikis, which need other languages than English, then you have made 13 edits in French and ... the rest wikis have less than 5 edits. You are not ready to work in multilanguage environment. Taivo (talk) 16:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  32. Zindor (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Re-sysop incident concerns me Zindor (talk) 03:12, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  33. Ottawahitech (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Seems like a hat-collector to me? but I guess I'll be able to change my mind? Ottawahitech (talk) 14:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  34. Levivich (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Per the other 'no' votes. Trust and experience aren't the issue for me here, it's too many roles, too many mistakes in those roles (not just the recent IAR resysop, and probably likely due to having too many roles and thus having attention diluted), not enough cross-wiki experience. Levivich (talk) 18:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  35. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Ankry (talk) 08:58, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  36. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021  --Roland Kutzki (talk) 14:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  37. BrxBrx (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Relatively low cross-wiki activity is concerning to me. Certainly trust and experience is very good with this user, but stewardship doesn't seem to be a necessary tool for this user. BrxBrx (talk) 07:15, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  38. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Ciao • Bestoernesto 04:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  39. Superyetkin (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Recent resysoping incident makes me think AmandaNP would not be the ideal candidate for stewardship. --Superyetkin (talk) 12:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  40. Nsk92 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Primarily per Levivich. For a Steward, having more substantive cross-wiki experience is essential. However, the recent Ivanvector episode leaves the distinct impression that the candidate is overextended already. Nsk92 (talk) 14:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
    Serial Number 54129 (Verification pending)   Over-extended supply lines are the ruin of many a great campaign: per AGK and Levivich, with particular reference to the recent IAR desysop, which is precisely the opposite to the behavoir we want in stewards. ——SerialNumber54129 16:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
    @Serial Number 54129: I absolutely respect your vote, just wanted to make it clear that it was a resysop and not desysop. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:58, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  41. SD0001 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   The resysop of Ivanvector isn't as concerning as the closure of Greenman's RFA a year back which surprisingly no one has commented about. Amanda opined strongly against extending the RFA on the talk page, then closed the RFA herself quickly thereafter, surprising at least two fellow bureaucrats who felt this action was improper. See discussion at en:User_talk:AmandaNP/Archives/2019#Just_curious. SD0001 (talk) 19:19, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

  NeutralEdit

  1. Uncitoyen (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   He/she had a global experience as an ombudsman. Also active on home-wiki. However, there isn't enough cross-wiki contribution. Although his/her answers are a little sufficient to me, they aren't enough to give support. --Uncitoyentalk 15:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
    Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  2. Minorax (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Minorax (talk) 15:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  3. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Overall competent candidate, functionary on enwp. Experienced as an OC member. However, I wish they have a little more crosswiki experience and the IAR is way too soon. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  4. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Parking for now, need to read in to this more. — xaosflux Talk 23:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  5. Super Wang (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Interesting candidate and cheerful promise, but I choose to be conservative for now. Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 03:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  6. Darkfrog24 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Darkfrog24 (talk) 03:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  7. 痛心疾首 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   痛心疾首 (talk) 04:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  8. Mirinano (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   mirinano (talk) 08:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  9. Geonuch (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Geonuch (talk) 01:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  10. Florian COLLIN (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Florian COLLIN (talk) 22:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  11. Ahmetlii (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   I wish to remain as an abstainer for now. Ahmetlii (talk) 15:33, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
       Toad62 (Not eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)   My only complaint is AmandaNP doesn't have much cross-wiki experience. However, they do seem to have potential to become a steward. Toad62 (talk) 16:25, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  12. Csisc (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Csisc (talk) 17:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  13. Gampe (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Gampe (talk) 10:37, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  14. Dreamy Jazz (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Moved to neutral per the comment made by Moneytrees Dreamy Jazz talk to me | enwiki 22:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  15. Mercy (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Mercy (talk) 11:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  16. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   I really admire Amanda's great dedication to CheckUser duties on the English Wikipedia, but would like to see more cross-wiki activity (being on ombuds is a great plus, but there's more to cross-wiki anti-abuse activities than I think they've had experience with) Jasper Deng (talk) 06:58, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  17. Robert Važan (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   — Robert Važan (talk) 05:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 

The 2021 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

CharitwoEdit

  • Languages: en-N
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello everyone, I am Charitwo and I've been a contributor for a little over 14 years. I started out in the very beginning with random edits and anti-vandalism work on Wikipedia, where lately I've found myself getting involved with improving bird related articles as needed as I have been a bird owner for a couple years now and it's nice to be involved with content again!

    I've also spent time contributing to various parts of the project including as a local administrator at MediaWiki.org for the last 7 years and spent a year as freenode staff (directly assisting projects including ours) and then a year as a WMF group contact on IRC under the nickname c where I am still very active helping with channel moderation and access mod duties across several channels including #wikimedia-stewardsconnect and #wikimedia-gsconnect and as a global op maintaining the project wide ban list along with making the current group contacts workload a little easier!

    With the advent of a global pandemic I began working from home in March and found myself with more free time to focus on another aspect of volunteering on-wiki due to the added availability and flexibility of working from home. So I'd like to put my experience back into the community as a steward.

    While my cross-wiki activity on WMF has been sporadic, I do already have extensive experience dealing with cross-wiki spam, vandalism, and long term abuse as a Volunteer Spam Task Force (VSTF) (which is now called SOAP[!?]) member for Wikia/Fandom accumulating over 100K+ global edits on 300K+ wikis over two years with performing an innumerous number of blocks, checkusers, deletions, and oversights. Their policies regarding usage and privacy are not unlike the policies here.

    If elected, my focus will be on teaming up with the existing Stewards in keeping the queues much more manageable. The various queues under Steward requests get backlogged and we can make a bigger impact this year by having a strong, dedicated team. Like others I am available on IRC at the aforementioned channels for any issues that may require immediate attention.

    I hope my longevity with the project, the number of areas of contributed to during that time and my experience with cross-wiki cleanup in general should be sufficient for election in addition to my meeting the all the requirements for candidacy. I look forward to providing the same dedication I've put in other areas of our community into stewardship.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2021/Questions#Charitwo


  YesEdit

  1. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021   I think they should be given a chance. CptViraj (talk) 15:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  2. Vit Koz (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Трэба даць чалавеку шанец. Vit; talk 17:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  3. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   My experiences with Charitwo on IRC and in the MediaWiki project have generally been positive. I'm disappointed that others don't see MediaWiki.org as a co-equal Wikimedia project. Legoktm (talk) 21:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  4. Nurtenge (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   I think he will be a good steward Nurtenge (talk) 07:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  5. Wiwik P (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Wiwik P (talk) 01:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  6. Elliot321 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   I'm unsure of the procedure to change my vote, but I would like to. After a discussion with this candidate they managed to alleviate my concerns, both about them being globally locked on Wikia, and about their homewiki being mediawiki.org. While this probably won't affect the fate of this candidacy, I would like my vote to be updated if possible. Elliot321 (talk) 02:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  7. Whiteguru (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Competent and will probably be a fine steward Whiteguru (talk) 09:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  8. Eatcha (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Eatcha (talk) 17:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  9. Alexdoherty4 (Eligible, checked by 94rain)2021   Alexdoherty4 (talk) 03:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  10. Cairo2k18 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Cairo2k18(talk)(contribs) 06:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  11. Mahedi181 (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Mahedi Hasan (talk) 11:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  12. Юрко Градовський (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Юрко Градовський (talk) 13:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  13. Jmbranum (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Jmbranum (talk) 18:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
       SVG (Not eligible, checked by Xaosflux)   Tim (SVG) 19:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  14. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Gereon K. (talk) 23:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  15. Wil540 art (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   🍀 Wil540 art (talk) 01:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  16. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Ciao • Bestoernesto 03:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  17. Vikrantkorde (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Vikrantkorde (talk) 13:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  18. WikiAviator (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   WikiAviator (talk) 02:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  19. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   OlEnglish (Talk) 13:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  20. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Novak Watchmen (talk) 23:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

  NoEdit

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Coming in with 2,000 edits over 14 years makes a mockery of a steward's need to be engaged with the Wikimedia community in order to judge consensus. Also (as you can probably guess) am not a fan of the borderline arrogance displayed on the questions page. Rschen7754 14:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  2. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Herby talk thyme 14:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  3. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Does not inspire confidence. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  4. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Unappealing candidate. Even if I were to ignore the bizarrely low number of edits and the weird case of never having an RfA, your answers were similarly bad. Your answer to the "uniqueness" question was generic, and your answer to the "bizarre situations" problem is not what a good steward should do in my opinion. Leaderboard (talk) 14:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  5. Blablubbs (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Blablubbs (talk) 14:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  6. Tks4Fish (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 14:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  7. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021   I cannot vote for someone who has little to none of Wikimedia experience. Also, status of this Fandom user is very interesting. Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  8. Savh (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   Not convinced the user has sufficient experience to contribute to the steward duties. Savhñ 14:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  9. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   No previous activity that suggests they would be a fitting steward. MF-W 14:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  10. Miraclepine (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   ミラP@Miraclepine 14:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  11. -akko (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Can not trust. (`・ω・´) (talk) 14:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  12. AGK (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   AGK ■ 14:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  13. ImprovedWikiImprovment (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Very limited cross-wiki experience, and no demonstrated need for the permission. --IWI (talk) 14:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  14. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Very low contributions across all projects and lack of advanced permissions on any content projects. — xaosflux Talk 14:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  15. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021   I cannot in good conscience support a candidate who was unable to answer specific, simple questions about edits and who has no cross wiki work whatsoever and almost no edits in the last decade to even their home wiki. The reliance on their fandom work - which they did not even provide a link to - is irrelevant to Wikimedia, however presenting themselves as a checkuser and advance right holder on a project where they are globally locked is beyond concerning to the point that this users candidacy almost seems like trolling. Praxidicae (talk) 14:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  16. NGC 54 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Very little cross-wiki contribution in a very long period of time (Special:CentralAuth/Charitwo). --NGC 54 (talk / contribs) 14:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  17. Saroj Uprety (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Saroj Uprety (talk) 14:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  18. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Stryn (talk) 14:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  19. Uncitoyen (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   No cross-wiki activity. He/she isn't active even on his/her main wiki. I'm not satisfied with some of his/her answers (especilally Fandom). --Uncitoyentalk 14:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  20. Dreamy Jazz (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Not a sysop on any content wikis and per above pretty much. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | enwiki 15:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  21. -revi (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Fails User:-revi/SEV#3 (possibly 1). — regards, Revi 15:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  22. Spicy (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Spicy (talk) 15:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  23. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   TonyBallioni (talk) 15:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  24. Dylsss (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Dylsss (talk) 15:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  25. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Af koan Foi 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 15:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  26. ZabeMath (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   ZabeMath (talk) 15:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  27. Minorax (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Minorax (talk) 15:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  28. User456541 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Having 100k edits on Wikia is not a reason to be a steward here –User456541 15:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  29. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   This user doesn't seem to understand the core value's of Wikimedia. When someone tries to convince you that their bizarre arguments are really true, the first reaction shouldn't be "troll, let's ignore". We should assume good faith. Also, answers to the other questions aren't convincing. Natuur12 (talk) 15:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  30. ElHef (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 16:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  31. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Miniapolis 16:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  32. Vermont (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Negligible relevant experience, no community trust, no cross-project work (or...any work), and sub-par answers to questions. Vermont (talk) 16:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  33. GeneralNotability (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Per several others above (particularly Prax and Vermont) - negligible Wikimedia participation for a role of this magnitude, Fandom/Wikia is irrelevant to me, I do not believe they have demonstrated that they have the community participation or trust necessary for Stewarship. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  34. MrJaroslavik (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Sysop only on mediawiki. MrJaroslavik (talk) 16:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  35. SQL (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   SQLQuery me! 16:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  36. Majavah (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   per Praxidicae. Majavah (talk!) 16:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  37. Pppery (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   * Pppery * it has begun 16:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  38. Aranya (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Aranya (talk) 17:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  39. Kb03 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Per Praxidicae Kb03 (talk) 17:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  40. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   I cannot accept a candidate whose only adminship that qualifies is one without any vote, and was just handled out by trust by a crat. I will like to see SE as not the 1st vote anyone had undertaken. There is also insufficient crosswiki activity, and wikia/fandom have no place here in determing experience - they are disparate projects. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  41. Mz7 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Not enough experience on Wikimedia projects, unfortunately. Mz7 (talk) 18:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  42. BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   BrunoBoehmler (talk) 18:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  43. Perryprog (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   I really wish this wasn't the case, but I doubt the skills and knowledge Wikia requires overlap enough with what Stewardship requires. Perryprog (talk) 19:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  44. Kusurija (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Not enough experience. Kusurija (talk) 20:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  45. Nguyentrongphu (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Seems like trolling. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 20:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  46. Samuele2002 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   No experience. Samuele2002 (Talk!) 20:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  47. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   ToBeFree (talk) 21:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  48. DrTrumpet (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Thanks for your work. Collect more Admin Experience DrTrumpet (talk) 23:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  49. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   dwf² 01:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  50. JavaHurricane (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   No crosswiki experience over 14 years. JavaHurricane 01:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
    Elliot321 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   mediawiki.org isn't really a content-wiki, this user doesn't meet the spirit of the rules listed at Stewards/Elections 2021/Guidelines#Candidates Elliot321 (talk) 04:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC) Changed to support after discussion with the candidate, see above. Elliot321 (talk) 02:57, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  51. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   I'm sorry, but this is a hard no. 1) You were never elected to hold any trusted position on any Wikimedia project (MediaWiki is not a content wiki and you received your sysop role there without any vote by a direct request while also having made barely any edits there). 2) Your overall edit count is low and you don't have any cross-wiki experience. Meiræ 06:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  52. Mirinano (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   mirinano (talk) 08:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  53. Jack Frost (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Jack Frost (talk) 08:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  54. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2021   cyrfaw (talk) 08:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  55. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Not enough experience. –Ejs-80 10:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  56. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Johannnes89 (talk) 14:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  57. Michel Bakni (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Michel Bakni (talk) 17:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  58. Imetsia (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Imetsia (talk) 18:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  59. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Needs to be more active on projects here rather than on Wikia. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 18:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  60. DraconicDark (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   DraconicDark (talk) 19:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  61. OhKayeSierra (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Per everyone else OhKayeSierra (talk) 19:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  62. Patrik L. (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Patrik L. (talk) 22:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  63. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   concerns with experience FASTILY 01:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  64. Enjoyer of World (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Not even funny. Enjoyer of World (talk) 05:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  65. Maynich (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Maynich (talk) 05:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  66. Mirer (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Mirer (talk) 05:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  67. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by -akko)2021   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 05:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  68. Kocgs (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Kocgs (talk) 08:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  69. MarioJump83 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Not enough experience, low number of edits is quite far below the threshold for a steward. MarioJump83! 08:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  70. Man77 (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2021   As always my "No" to monolingual stewards. → «« Man77 »» [de] 10:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  71. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2021   O.Koslowski (talk) 10:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  72. Gripweed (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Gripweed (talk) 10:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  73. NickK (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   I think the cross-wiki experience is very weak. I would expect a steward have a bigger editing experience to have a better understanding of how our editing communities work, especially the smaller ones — NickK (talk) 12:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  74. Giraffer (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Giraffer (talk) 14:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  75. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Daniuu (talk) 16:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  76. John M Wolfson (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Sorry, but the Simply because it's the position I applied to take responsibility for, like any job I've ever worked (even volunteer work) answer to "Why would you be active here?" sinks this for me. John M Wolfson (talk) 17:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  77. SK2242 (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2021   Not enough activity, barely any presence at AfD. SK2242 (talk) 17:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  78. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Too inexperienced with English only. Jusjih (talk) 23:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  79. Impartial just (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   I think you might need to contribute more on wikimedia sites. Especially on small wiki site. In your contribution history you mainly edit in English Wikipedia. But, your contributions there cannot that me vote for yes, it's too less. Wish you can contribute more on small wikis like English Wikinews. ℑ𝔪𝔭𝔞𝔯𝔱𝔦𝔞𝔩 𝔧𝔲𝔰𝔱🎙️ 01:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  80. Sun8908 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Not enough xwiki experience. Sun8908 (talk) 06:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  81. Nosebagbear (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Far too little experience Nosebagbear (talk) 10:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  82. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   – Ammarpad (talk) 11:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  83. Kudpung (Eligible, checked by Perryprog)2021   Kudpung (talk) 12:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  84. 20041027 tatsu (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   20041027 tatsu (talk) 15:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  85. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Hiàn (talk) 19:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  86. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Cbyd (talk) 09:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  87. Ahmetlii (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Although I'm appreciating the user's regular contributions for over 10 years; there's not enough editing experience even in non-Wikipedia wikis, which is vital for a steward.Ahmetlii (talk) 15:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
       Toad62 (Not eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)   Toad62 (talk) 16:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  88. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Centaur271188 (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  89. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   ArdiPras95 (talk) 21:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  90. Zppix (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2021   Zppix (talk) 09:04, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  91. Juan90264 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Juan90264 (talk) 17:32, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  92. علاء (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   --Alaa :)..! 17:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  93. CanadianToast (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   CanadianToast (talk) 21:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  94. Gobonobo (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   gobonobo + c 07:52, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  95. Carsrac (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   This a cross wiki function and large part of the job is multilanguage and someone that only speaks one language is not the right person of this job. Carsrac (talk) 08:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  96. AVSmalnad77 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Not enough experience in Wikimedia projects. AVSmalnad77 talk 06:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  97. AFBorchert (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Extremely limited experience, no language skills other than English. AFBorchert (talk) 10:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  98. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   ~Cybularny Speak? 20:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  99. Mfb (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Essentially zero activity outside of English-speaking communities mfb (talk) 20:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  100. Teles (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Pouca atividade cross-wiki. Resposta às perguntas não surpreenderam. Tenho certeza de que tem potencial para demonstrar mais afinidade com as tarefas dos Stewards desde que interaja mais nos processos relacionados. —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 14:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  101. Geraki (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021   Geraki TL 19:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  102. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Sorry, but personally with an average of 22 contributions per year (Wikiscan and Xtools), the applicant has not acquired the necessary bases to apply for the position. DePlusJean (talk) 12:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
       Storkk (Not eligible, checked by Jianhui67)   Storkk (talk) 10:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  103. Tolly4bolly (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   not enough experience T4B (talk) 11:48, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  104. Taivo (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   You have no crosswiki activity. If we look projects in other languages than English, then you have made less than 5 edits in everyone of them. You are not ready to work in multilingual community. Taivo (talk) 08:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  105. Jules* (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Too little on-wiki (I mean Wikimedia wikis) experience, imho. — Jules Talk 10:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  106. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021   Rzuwig 11:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  107. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021  --Roland Kutzki (talk) 14:59, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  108. SMcCandlish (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Insufficient actual community involvement. Having a barely-used account for 14 years is basically meaningless.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  20:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  109. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   *Youngjin (talk) 04:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  110. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Octahedron80 (talk) 09:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  111. Mercy (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Mercy (talk) 11:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  112. Arccosecant (Eligible, checked by -akko)2021   Nowhere near the requisite level of experience. — csc-1 22:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  113. NK1406 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   NK1406 (talk) 01:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  114. JLavigne508 (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   <Could use a bit more time on wikimedia as per this role in my opinion.>. JLavigne508 (talk) 13:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  115. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Lack of experience and piss-poor editing activity. If it was 1 April I would've assumed this was an April fools joke!. –Davey2010Talk 17:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  116. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Ameisenigel (talk) 09:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  117. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 14:23, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  118. Amorymeltzer (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   ~ Amory (utc) 19:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  119. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   Dash77 (talk) 01:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  120. Cabayi (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Insufficient experience Cabayi (talk) 14:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  121. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Negative, per Rschen7754. There's no real harm in arroganc when it's deserved; unfortunately, in this candidature, it is not. ——SerialNumber54129 16:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  122. Mrschimpf (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Mrschimpf (talk) 04:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  123. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  124. Bradv (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   – bradv🍁 20:01, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  125. ZI Jony (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 06:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  126. Masti (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   masti <talk> 18:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  127. Kallichore (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   --Kallichore (talk) 21:54, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  128. Nadzik (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Nadzik (talk) 08:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
  129. Base (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   I am absolutely pro MWW work and such as the main focus, I am also happy that they have relevant experience elsewhere, but the scale of contributions to Wikimedia wikis is just too small to give the most advanced technical flag off it at this point. Base (talk) 12:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

  NeutralEdit

  1. Zblace (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Zblace (talk) 14:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  2. Kizule (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Kizule (talk) 16:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  3. 痛心疾首 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   痛心疾首 (talk) 04:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  4. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  5. Joseywales1961 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Joseywales1961 (talk) 13:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  6. นคเรศ (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Nakaret (talk) 15:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  7. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Dostojewskij (talk) 23:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  8. Geonuch (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Geonuch (talk) 01:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  9. MJL (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   I just don't want to pile on. I haven't looked at the questions, but I did find their wiki-resume to be rather adequate (just not for a potential steward- though it is more than I think people are giving credit for). If Charitwo put their mind to it, I could probably support this next year with sufficient cross-wiki experience. –MJLTalk 06:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  10. TSK201911 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   TSK201911 (talk) 07:08, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  11. Firestar464 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Firestar464 (talk) 11:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  12. Florian COLLIN (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Florian COLLIN (talk) 22:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  13. WhitePhosphorus (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   I feel like Charitwo is capable enough and all they need is more interactions with Wikimedia community and more cross-wiki experience on Wikimedia wikis. WhitePhosphorus (talk) 05:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  14. 94rain (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Per WhitePhosphorus. Hope they can bring their so-called expertise in fandom to Wikimedia 94rain Talk 13:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  15. PoetVeches (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   PoetVeches (talk) 13:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  16. Veracious (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Veracious (talk) 14:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  17. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021    Klaas `Z4␟` V:  21:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  18. Chz (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Chz (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  19. KPX8 (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   KPX8 (talk) 00:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  20. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 14:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  21. Csisc (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Csisc (talk) 17:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  22. Mykola7 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Small cross-wiki experience Mykola7 (talk) 20:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  23. Zabia (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Zabia (talk) 09:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  24. Gampe (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Gampe (talk) 10:38, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  25. chansey (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Honestly, I am not sure. Cross-wiki experience is important for stewards. chansey message? 13:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  26. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   The X-tool editcounter and the Wikiscan stats give me an idea this is a beginner. I'm not gonna vote NO, this is not to slaughter the candidate, but I do 2000 edits in 6 weeks (the last years). I'm sure Charitwo has other qualities to become a steward, but not this year. The cross-wiki experience is limited and I don't have a clue what Charitwo can do as steward, she/he has to learn everything from others (things that non-stewards sometimes already know). So thanks for your candidacy, maybe in a few years? Richardkiwi (talk) 13:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  27. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Darkhan 17:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  28. User3749 (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   User3749 (talk) 05:05, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  29. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   DannyS712 (talk) 22:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  30. Robert McClenon (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Robert McClenon (talk) 05:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  31. Robert Važan (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   — Robert Važan (talk) 05:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 

The 2021 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

DannyS712Edit

  • Languages: en, he-2, es-2, zh-2
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hi. I'm DannyS712. I spend a lot of my time dealing with spambots and LTAs, both as a global sysop and as a local sysop on a number of wikis. If you want to know which wikis I have advanced rights on, see my user page here on meta, or my global account info (Special:CentralAuth/DannyS712). Xtools says I have over 2400 edits to Steward requests/Global, where I frequently report accounts and IPs for stewards to lock/globally block.

    I know that stewards often have to deal with sensitive information; I have experience dealing with sensitive information as an OTRS agent, an Oversighter on Wikidata (though I've only been an OS there since December 2020), and as a member of the account creation team on enwiki.

    When I'm online, I can usually be reached on IRC, and #wikimedia-stewards is one of the channels I idle in. I have noticed times when there is an ongoing cross-wiki vandal and no stewards are available, and while this is perfectly understandable (stewards are volunteers) I think it would be beneficial to expand the steward ranks.

    I am a volunteer MediaWiki developer with +2 rights, and if I become a steward I can look for places where stewards' workflow can be improved either via user scripts or improvements to the relevant MediaWiki core/extension code.

    I'm happy to answer questions.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2021/Questions#DannyS712


  YesEdit

  1. Yining Chen (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   --Yining Chen (Talk) 14:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  2. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   A very capable user, and in particular they have demostrated very good technical skills which I think would help the community a lot (from their "uniqueness" answer), and I can attest to the anti-vandalism work they do at my homewikis. Also handled Revi's challenging question about CU very well, and I'm satisfied with his response to that question. Their answer to the "bizarre situations" problem was fine as well. My main concern is honestly activity, you seem to be doing a lot and I'm not sure how you're going to maintain it as a steward. Leaderboard (talk) 14:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  3. ImprovedWikiImprovment (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   --IWI (talk) 14:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  4. Super Wang (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   From what Danny promised I can support them, everyone should learn to walk before they run; still I'd appreciate if Danny's learning won't take too long. Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 14:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  5. LuchoCR (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   LuchoCR (talk) 15:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  6. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 15:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  7. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021   CptViraj (talk) 15:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  8. User456541 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Global sysop and have major contributions to SRG –User456541 15:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  9. Kizule (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   I think that Danny will be a good steward too. Kizule (talk) 16:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  10. Pppery (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   * Pppery * it has begun 16:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  11. Vit Koz (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Good luck Vit; talk 17:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  12. Fitindia (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   - FitIndia Talk Admin on Commons 18:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  13. Jayprakash12345 (Eligible, checked by -akko)2021   Jayprakash >>> Talk 02:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  14. LClightcat (Eligible, checked by -akko)2021   メッキの光の勇者-猫🇨🇳Drink tea in tea room🐱 03:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  15. Darkfrog24 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   I worked with Danny on the English Wikinews and Simple English Wikipedia, and he seems to have his head on straight. Darkfrog24 (talk) 03:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  16. 游魂 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Yo Yan 06:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  17. AfroThundr3007730 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   — AfroThundr (u · t · c) 07:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  18. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  19. Mtarch11 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Mtarch11 (talk) 08:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  20. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Although I do share some concerns raised in the "No"/"Neutral" sections, I am still inclined to support this candidacy. Meiræ 08:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  21. Lt2818 (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2021   Lt2818 (talk) 09:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  22. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  23. Hasley (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Sgd. —Hasley 17:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  24. Imetsia (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Imetsia (talk) 18:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  25. M-Mustapha (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Em-mustapha User | talk 20:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  26. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Dostojewskij (talk) 23:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  27. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Richardkiwi (talk) 00:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  28. Wiwik P (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Wiwik P (talk) 01:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  29. Eric0892 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Eric0892 (talk) 05:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  30. MJL (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Yay DannyS712!!! –MJLTalk 05:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  31. Firestar464 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Firestar464 (talk) 11:09, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  32. Tgr (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Tgr (talk) 16:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  33. عبد المسيح (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2021   عبد المسيح (talk) 17:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  34. SK2242 (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2021   Capable. SK2242 (talk) 17:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  35. Globalphilosophy (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   --Globalphilosophy (-̮̮̃•̃) (ღTalk ♥) 21:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  36. Florian COLLIN (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Florian COLLIN (talk) 22:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  37. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Jusjih (talk) 23:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  38. Impartial just (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Hope you can help us (Chinese Wikisites). ℑ𝔪𝔭𝔞𝔯𝔱𝔦𝔞𝔩 𝔧𝔲𝔰𝔱🎙️ 01:33, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  39. Sportzpikachu (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Sportzpikachu (talk) 08:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  40. Mirinano (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   mirinano (talk) 11:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  41. Veracious (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Veracious (talk) 14:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  42. 20041027 tatsu (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   20041027 tatsu (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  43. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Hiàn (talk) 20:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  44. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021    Klaas `Z4␟` V:  21:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  45. Coffeeandcrumbs (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 03:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  46. L293D (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   L293D ( • ) 13:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  47. Tanbirzx (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Tanbirzx (talk) 15:29, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  48. Ahmetlii (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Ahmetlii (talk) 15:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  49. Chz (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Chz (talk) 16:41, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  50. Eatcha (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Eatcha (talk) 17:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  51. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   ArdiPras95 (talk) 21:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  52. MusikAnimal (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   I agree DannyS712 has moved up the ladder almost uncomfortably fast compared to your average Wikimedian. I used to be concerned with how they would manage their ever growing list of responsibilities. But, as far as I can tell, with each new position of trust, the results were at least a net positive and more often outstanding. Somehow they still have enough energy to stay true to their commitments and produce quality work, be it in the form of counter-vandalism, technical contributions, or otherwise. Enough time has passed that I can say DannyS712 has earned my trust, and my fandom. I for one think they would be a highly productive steward, and judging by their requests for steward intervention that I've responded to, I believe they would know how to use the tools judiciously. MusikAnimal talk 21:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  53. KPX8 (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   KPX8 (talk) 23:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  54. Alexdoherty4 (Eligible, checked by 94rain)2021   Alexdoherty4 (talk) 03:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  55. Nightfury (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Nightfury (talk) 12:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  56. Juan90264 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Juan90264 (talk) 17:32, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  57. Zezen (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Seems very competent and experienced, including hunting for ru casino spambots, plus his zh skills. Zezen (talk) 21:34, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  58. RandomCanadian (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   RandomCanadian (talk) 04:52, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  59. SD0001 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   per MusikAnimal above. Net positive. SD0001 (talk) 11:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  60. Csisc (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Csisc (talk) 17:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  61. ProcrastinatingReader (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Per MusikAnimal. Adding: Imo the CheckUser situation has been drastically overblown. If folks have an axe to grind with the WMF, do it with the WMF. Most of that situation is on pure principle, I’m not sure there were really any pragmatic concerns, especially given log access, and if there were then people failed to make those clear. The question about RfA on enwiki was somewhat bait. The answer was unsatisfactory, sure, but I’m not sure how much better he could’ve answered the question. Don’t really see any competence issues, as far as it relates to the role of steward. I do agree with Tony’s point on the algorithmic approach to communication; I hope that improves, but even if not I guess it doesn’t really factor too much into locking spambots etc, and most regular steward tasks. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 20:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  62. Ckoerner (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Ckoerner (talk) 21:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  63. Mark7747 (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Mark7747 (talk) 15:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  64. Bilorv (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   I see no indication that the candidate would be untrustworthy with the tools or use them in a net negative manner. — Bilorv (talk) 23:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  65. Юрко Градовський (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Юрко Градовський (talk) 13:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  66. Soundwaweserb (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  67. Julle (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Julle (talk) 20:04, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  68. Xbspiro (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   - from what I have seen on en.wn, he is capable and willing. (Leaving the project the way you did puzzles me though. Most submissions there don't make it, and you know it.) - Xbspiro (talk) 16:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  69. Raimundo Pastor (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021   Raimundo Pastor (talk) 20:29, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  70. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Shizhao (talk) 01:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  71. Jack Frost (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Per MusikAnimal and ProcrastinatingReader. Jack Frost (talk) 02:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  72. Levivich (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   I don't think homewiki adminship should be a prerequisite to cross-wiki advanced permissions (as long as there is other experience, which there is with Danny). There are lots of reasons why someone might not want to run for RFA or be an admin on enwiki; Danny avoiding getting into the reasons why not is an example of politeness that shouldn't be held against him. Similarly, getting CU on testwiki as part of WMF dev work doesn't strike me as any kind of problem. Danny has shown he can have advanced perms and not abuse them and that's what matters. He is competent to assist the many wikis we have that don't have a large admin corps if he has steward rights. Trust + competence meets my criteria. Levivich (talk) 08:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  73. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Gereon K. (talk) 23:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  74. Érico (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Moral support, but please 1) resign from some of your current rights (it's really too much and very difficult to believe that someone can be an effective steward in this scenario) and 2) run again in the future. Érico (talk) 00:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  75. Mahedi181 (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Mahedi Hasan (talk) 11:25, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  76. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021   Rzuwig 11:34, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  77. Ed6767 (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Ed6767 (talk) 15:41, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  78. Ssstela (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Ssstela (talk) 21:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  79. Asartea (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2021   Asartea Talk (Enwiki Talk (preferred)) 07:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  80. Taivo (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Excellent crosswiki activity, but bad answers to questions. You answered like a robot, not like a human. But then I started to think: why not to have one robot-steward? We have a lot of bots with admin rights, let's have now a bot steward as well. Taivo (talk) 08:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  81. J ansari (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   -J. Ansari Talk 18:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  82. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Ciao • Bestoernesto 03:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  83. Clump (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Clump (talk) 13:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  84. JLavigne508 (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   JLavigne508 (talk) 13:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  85. 94rain (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   94rain Talk 03:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  86. User3749 (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   User3749 (talk) 05:11, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  87. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Ameisenigel (talk) 09:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  88. Hardenacke (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Hardenacke (talk) 14:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  89. Coffins (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   Coffins (talk) 21:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  90. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   Dash77 (talk) 01:47, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  91. WikiAviator (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   WikiAviator (talk) 02:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  92. Tiven2240 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Tiven2240 (talk) 17:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  93. Adithyak1997 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Adithyak1997 (talk) 07:48, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  94. ידידיה צ' צבאן (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   ידידיה צ' צבאן (talk) 10:28, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  95. Robert McClenon (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Robert McClenon (talk) 05:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  96. Masti (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   masti <talk> 18:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  97. Charitwo (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   The CU situation is weird and awkward, but I don't think it's disqualifying. I do wonder why this wasn't on a non-production instance if it was for development purposes, but that's not my call. Overall, I see them as a great contributor in various aspects of the project and I have no doubt they would serve in the role well. Charitwo (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  98. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   --Marshallsumter (talk) 02:24, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
  99. Suffusion of Yellow (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Basically per MusikAnimal; my first reaction here was "way too soon". But that's been my reaction to some of the other rights Danny has acquired over the years and I've always been proven very wrong. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 05:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
  100. Nadzik (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Nadzik (talk) 08:01, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
  101. DavidDelaune (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Global sysop and great script writer. DavidDelaune (talk) 09:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
  102. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Moved from neutral, mainly I still have concerns about the issues raised in my neutral !vote, just parking here for moral support. I hope DannyS712 will not feel too discouraged and continue to serve us well, you are much appreciated. Just take it slower and take in heart what the opposers gave, and work on these concerns. I guess after a while, you will be a much stronger candidate. Thank you for standing still. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:45, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
  103. Base (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   I am not happy with the testwiki incident, but I do trust that Danny will make a good steward. Hopefully next time they will pass. Base (talk) 12:07, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

  NoEdit

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Stewards are supposed to insist that community consensus and global policy are to be followed by the WMF - not to take advantage when the WMF decides to go against the community, as seen at phab:T268090#6630726 when the candidate got CU rights on testwiki against the global CU policy. Sad to say, I do not think this incident reflects well on his ability to stand up to the WMF in situations like this. Rschen7754 14:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  2. -revi (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Fails my voting criteria 1, 4.2. Improper, unauthorized access to CheckUserLog data has not been sufficiently addressed. — regards, Revi 14:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  3. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   I have serious concerns with his ability to interact with community members in a way that is human and not rigid and formulaic. His responses to the questions (particularly Nick’s and revi’s) dodged what they were actually asking and provided answers that amounted to little more than “I have answered your question and I am right.” That is not the correct temperament to be a steward. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  4. Tks4Fish (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Per Rschen, -revi, Tony. He has problems dealing with people which is not fitting for a steward. His responses to the emergency actions and to the homewiki questions were awfully bad, and his reply to the CU granting on testwiki did not respond to the issues there presented. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 14:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  5. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Herby talk thyme 14:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  6. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Not convinced, seems like a hatcollector. The answers to the questions are often "disappointing and uninformative", as one questioner put it. Also the CheckUser incident gives me pause. MF-W 14:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
    Miraclepine (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Per the CU log incident. ミラP@Miraclepine 14:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  7. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021   Danny's answers to questions are unsatisfying to me. They seem to recite policies rather than show how the candidate feels about the topic. As Nick put it, his answer to the enwiki RfA question was "disappointing and uninformative". In addition to that, his answer to my emergency situations cases doesn't satisfy me. It doesn't unravel how the candidate understands emergencies at all. I'm also concerned by the candidate's fast promotion track. Most of the permissions the candidate now has were granted in 2020. I don't think that gives him required experience. Maybe next time, Danny. Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  8. AGK (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   AGK ■ 14:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  9. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   For stewards, I like to see a much longer tenure engaging with communities. — xaosflux Talk 14:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  10. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021   Per many others, but particularly revi and Tony's points. Praxidicae (talk) 14:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  11. Spicy (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Concerned by answers to questions, particularly the one about emergency situations. Spicy (talk) 15:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  12. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   While I believe he means well, I think this candidacy is premature. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  13. Savh (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   Valid concerns have been raised. Savhñ 15:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  14. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   The concern mentioned by Rschen7754 cannot be overlooked. Natuur12 (talk) 16:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  15. Barkeep49 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   I approached Danny in July 2020 suggesting a possible enwiki RfA in a year. They responded to me that they had thought about it but were reluctant at that time given their recent enwikquote adminship. Could this be true and also it's true that they hadn't given it "much thought" which they told Nick? Maybe but it's confusing at best. Given how many permissions they do have it would be very surprising to me if they hadn't given thought about RfA on one of their homewikis. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
    @Barkeep49 I am confused by your opposition to DannyS712 as a Steward. Do you believe DannyS712 will not be a good Steward because DannyS712 chose not to apply for an Adminship at en-wiki? This is particularly confusing since others have rejeted DannyS712 as a hat-collector. How can he be a hat-collector if he turned down an an opportunity to be an admin at enwiki? Sincerely, Ottawahitech (talk) 00:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
    I had believed Danny would make a good enwiki admin which is why I talked to him. I believe his answers when asked about enwiki RfA by Nick were misleading. I do not want that from a Steward and so I am opposing. Barkeep49 (talk) 05:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  16. SQL (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   SQLQuery me! 16:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  17. MrJaroslavik (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Many, many, many hats... MrJaroslavik (talk) 16:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  18. Mz7 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Mz7 (talk) 18:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  19. BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   BrunoBoehmler (talk) 18:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  20. Count Count (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Count Count (talk) 21:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  21. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   ToBeFree (talk) 22:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  22. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   dwf² 01:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  23. JavaHurricane (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Serious concerns raised by others. Perhaps one or two more years' experience as GS and after a successful RfA at enwiki? I'll be more confident then. JavaHurricane 02:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  24. Ddxfx (Eligible, checked by -akko)2021   — Ddxfx 02:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  25. -akko (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   (`・ω・´) (talk) 03:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  26. 痛心疾首 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Per Rschen7754. Stewards should serve the community, and should not help WMF against the community. 痛心疾首 (talk) 04:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  27. Elliot321 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   I have nothing in problem with this candidate in general, but their answer to not running for RfA on enwiki was deeply unsatisfying to me. If they ran there, and were given the mop, I'd be likely to support them here, but their reasoning for not doing so was unconvincing. Elliot321 (talk) 04:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  28. Horst Emscher (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   for me its seemingly overacting Horst Emscher (talk) 07:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  29. Nurtenge (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Nurtenge (talk) 07:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  30. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2021   cyrfaw (talk) 08:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  31. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Johannnes89 (talk) 14:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  32. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   I am also concerned by the issue raised by Rschen7754. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 18:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  33. Nguyentrongphu (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   We need to be united against WMF's dictatorship. Per Rschen7754. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 19:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  34. OhKayeSierra (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   OhKayeSierra (talk) 19:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  35. Waggie (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   revi, Tony, and Xaosflux have summarized my concerns precisely. I think it's too soon. I think Danny should consider the concerns about their responses and also consider establishing more tenure in their current endeavors. Having worked with Danny to assist users on IRC, I think they're competent and a good person, I just don't think it's time yet. Waggie (talk) 20:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  36. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Danny's a good person but I'm not a big fan of the amount of hats he has. The WMF checkuser incident isn't a pleasure to see and the robotic answers to the questions posed against him do not give me confidence in his ability. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 20:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  37. Patrik L. (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Patrik L. (talk) 22:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  38. Janbery (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   janbery (talk) 22:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  39. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   premature imo, but would support a future run FASTILY 01:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  40. Enjoyer of World (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Enjoyer of World (talk) 05:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  41. Maynich (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Maynich (talk) 05:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  42. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2021   O.Koslowski (talk) 10:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  43. Gripweed (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Gripweed (talk) 10:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  44. NickK (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Mainly per Rschen7754 — NickK (talk) 12:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  45. John M Wolfson (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Per all. John M Wolfson (talk) 17:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  46. Jan Myšák (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Already a lot of responsibility gained by one user within a single year Jan Myšák (talk) 18:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  47. Robins7 (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Robins7 (talk) 21:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  48. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Regretfully, I have to land here, mostly due to the situation with CheckUser. At minimum, CheckUser privileges for development purposes should be only provided to WMF staff accounts, not personal or community accounts. Their answers are less satisfying than I expected. I'm willing to consider supporting next year. Jasper Deng (talk) 03:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  49. Sun8908 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Sun8908 (talk) 09:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  50. Whiteguru (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Appears to be too busy with other tasks and duties. Whiteguru (talk) 10:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  51. Kudpung (Eligible, checked by Perryprog)2021   Kudpung (talk) 12:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  52. Perryprog (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Revi and Tony put it quite well; while I believe they have the skills to be a Steward, I worry that the rest of what's required for Stewardship is lacking. Perryprog (talk) 13:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  53. Wim b (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Wim b 09:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  54. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   SPQRobin (talk) 12:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  55. CanadianToast (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   CanadianToast (talk) 21:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  56. Gobonobo (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   gobonobo + c 08:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  57. JJMC89 (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   — JJMC89(T·C) 07:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  58. Hadrianus (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Hadrianus (talk) 14:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  59. Jmbranum (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Jmbranum (talk) 18:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  60. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   MZaplotnik(talk) 15:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  61. CaptainEek (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Ughh I hate that I'm here, but the CU log incident is a serious issue in my eyes. Additionally, while Danny may have sysop in several places, they don't on enWP. Why have they never run? Why go for steward if you aren't even an admin on your home project? Danny's answer to this question is not reassuring, and it exemplifies what Tony points out: Danny is robotic, which is not an excellent quality for a steward. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 23:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  62. SMcCandlish (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Same concerns as Rschen7754 and TonyBallioni.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  20:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  63. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Octahedron80 (talk) 09:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  64. Mercy (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Mercy (talk) 11:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  65. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:00, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  66. NK1406 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   After reading through the questions and answers, I find myself inclined to stay on the safer side and vote no. NK1406 (talk) 01:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  67. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   per Revi, Tony and Capt Eek - Really hate to plonk myself here however the CU issue is too much of a big deal to ignore and I'm not entirely happy with the answers provided to it either. Genuinely disappointed to plonk myself here. –Davey2010Talk 17:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
    Hi @Davey2010: I just want to tell you that there are many participants in these elections who have no idea who Revi, Tony and Capt Eek are. I have become familiar only with the first one on your list of three, who happens to be a Steward running for re-confirmation, but I have no idea who Tony and Capt Eek are, nor can I find their comments on which you base your vote in the list above. Could you please clarify what the "CU issue" is? Thanks i advance, Ottawahitech (talk) 17:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
    Hi Ottawahitech, There is only one Tony here and only one Capt Eek here - Please use CTRL+F to find said people. CU = CheckUser. CU issue = Revi's question at Stewards/Elections_2021/Questions#DannyS712. Cheers, –Davey2010Talk 17:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
    Thanks for the speedy response @Davey I'll check the link you shared, but please don't assume that I have a "CTRL+F" on my keyboard. Thanks again. Ottawahitech (talk) 17:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
    Ottawahitech, you have an F on your keyboard at the very least, and there's very likely a control key somewhere. Regardless, as you've noticed it's unlikely that users will link every person, program, entity, organization, page, etc. that they refer to. It is not helpful for you to ask these users for direct links and explanations every time you see something you are not familiar with, especially when it is very often easy to find answers yourself (here, simply by scrolling up). Regards, Vermont (talk) 18:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  68. Amorymeltzer (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Generally per above — the CU thing was, at best, weird and uncomfortable, and I do have concerns about too much on a plate/burn out, etc. Not generally concerned about enWiki sysopship, which I think Danny has show judgment in not going for. ~ Amory (utc) 19:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  69. Guerillero (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Per the CU weirdness Guerillero Parlez Moi 04:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  70. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Il voit la cerise , per The Balioni & revi.. ——SerialNumber54129 17:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  71. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:09, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  72. Bradv (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Sorry, Danny, but you're stretched too thin as it is. Don't try to do everything at once – you won't do any of them well, and then you'll burn out. – bradv🍁 20:04, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  73. Nick (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   It is impossible to escape the impression that Danny is trying to acquire the maximum amount of permissions with the minimum of scrutiny. The CU incident is what comes from that lack of scrutiny, a couple of years from now, but, all being well, the CU stuff won't be a deal breaker. A year or two of continued (and perhaps, greater) scrutiny, and perhaps as importantly, ongoing editing at a sensible rate (you're not Superman, don't try to be) will put them in a good place to support. Nick (talk) 21:16, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  74. ZI Jony (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 06:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  75. عماد الدين المقدسي (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   all the above reasons are enough to vote with no. PhD_IMAD (talk) 11:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

  NeutralEdit

  1. Minorax (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Minorax (talk) 15:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  2. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Miniapolis 16:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  3. 1989 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Take this as a moral support. Despite the opposition, there's no denial you are a hardworker and dedicated to it. Take the opposition to heart, improve yourself, keep up the good work and one day, you will become a Steward. 1989 (talk) 17:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
    Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Very hard decision on this one, Danny is a very hardworking candidate who despite having flags in many wikis, still manages to be relatively active in all. He isn't a hat collector. The enwp RFA issue / CU issues isn't what that makes me hesitant in supporting, it's the emergency situations question. Thanks so much for volunteering. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  4. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   I've had the pleasure of working with Danny a lot on MediaWiki stuff lately. He works hard and most importantly learns and is never afraid to ask questions. However, I'm very worried that he's going to burnout with all of the responsibilities he's taking on and I really don't want to see that happen. Legoktm (talk) 21:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  5. ElHef (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   What 1989 said. I have no doubt that once you put this hat on you'll wear it well, as you have many others. Keep up the excellent work and one day I will be in the Yes column for you. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 22:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  6. DrTrumpet (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   I think you are busy enough DrTrumpet (talk) 23:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  7. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by -akko)2021   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 03:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  8. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   per Legoktm. Mahir256 (talk) 04:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  9. WhitePhosphorus (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Danny is unanimously capable and diligent in technical stuff, though the community may expect more for a steward - just as what 1989 said, keep it up and you'll be there. WhitePhosphorus (talk) 05:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  10. Uncitoyen (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Danny is an active user. However, the negative opinions give a chance me think a little bit. The length discussions and few responses had a little negative impact on me. Other hand, Danny is successful in most of his roles for now and helpful, and I hope Danny will do better on steward nominations in the future. --Uncitoyentalk 08:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  11. Joseywales1961 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Joseywales1961 (talk) 13:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  12. Geonuch (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Geonuch (talk) 01:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  13. Blue Sonic (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Blue Sonic (talk) 02:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  14. IN (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Pls help to translate to english, thx. 尽管这位用户是这次监管员选举中唯一一个会中文的用户,但是当我看了一下下面的投票,发现反对的人比支持的人还多,所以我投下了中立票。 IN (talk) 02:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
    Translation: This user is the only SE candidate who knows Chinese. However, after looking at the votes below briefly, I realised that there are more oppose votes than support votes. Hence, I voted neutral. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  15. Mirer (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   When I read you name, I thought this would be an easy yes. But to be honest, the answers to the questions left me confused. Mirer (talk) 05:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  16. MarioJump83 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Danny is capable enough for being a steward, however there is a lot of questions. I'm going to be neutral. MarioJump83! 08:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  17. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Daniuu (talk) 17:09, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  18. Dylsss (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Dylsss (talk) 22:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  19. Jni (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Has required competence, but opponents have valid points also. jni (talk) 08:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  20. PoetVeches (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   PoetVeches (talk) 13:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  21. YFdyh000 (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   I am happy to see the existence of a steward who understands Chinese, but as mentioned and worried in the comments above, I don't know what improvement he will bring if be elected. I am also worried that he will not have enough time to deal with many things. In addition, I have not read all the questions and comments due to language barriers, it seems that his answers and some actions are not very satisfactory. YFdyh000 (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  22. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Cbyd (talk) 09:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
       Toad62 (Not eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)   Toad62 (talk) 16:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  23. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Centaur271188 (talk) 17:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  24. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 14:31, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  25. علاء (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   I admire DannyS712 activity, and he has a good experience, but I think he needs more time to interact with the communities --Alaa :)..! 17:43, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  26. Cairo2k18 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Cairo2k18(talk)(contribs) 06:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  27. Mykola7 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Mykola7 (talk) 21:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  28. Draceane (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   per 1989 — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  29. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   ~Cybularny Speak? 20:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  30. P,TO 19104 (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   P,TO 19104 (talk) 14:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  31. AVSmalnad77 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Undoubtedly a hard worker with a strong cross wiki activity record. But I think he needs to wait for more time to become a Steward. AVSmalnad77 talk 06:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  32. Zabia (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Zabia (talk) 09:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  33. Gampe (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Gampe (talk) 10:40, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  34. Saroj Uprety (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Saroj Uprety (talk) 05:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  35. Teles (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Tem muito a contribuir com sua presença e proatividade e um forte conhecimento na área técnica, mas gostaria de ver algo mais. As respostas a algumas perguntas pareceram evasivas demais. —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 14:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  36. Geraki (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021   Geraki TL 19:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  37. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Like many people here, I have a sincere respect for DannyS712's contributions (Wikiscan and Xtools) but I have doubts about the relationship with the community DePlusJean (talk) 12:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  38. Miraclepine (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Switching to neutral per the observations by the yes camp. Sure this user has the experience and admin rights on seven wikis (albeit got them a little faster than usual) and is IMHO sufficiently competent. That said, I share the no camp's skepticism about trusting the steward tools to someone whose answers to a question about WMF power over community power are concerning, so I can't say yes. (Though, this is without prejudice to a yes in 2022.) ミラP@Miraclepine 00:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  39. Jules* (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   User doing a lot for the community, but I share some concerns expressed in the "No" §. — Jules Talk 10:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  40. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Darkhan 17:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  41. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   OlEnglish (Talk) 13:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  42. Mrschimpf (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Mrschimpf (talk) 04:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  43. Robert Važan (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   — Robert Važan (talk) 05:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  44. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   I think he would be a competent steward, but there are some concerns raised so I can't unfortunately support this year. Stryn (talk) 07:54, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 

The 2021 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Klein MuçiEdit

  • Languages: sq-N, en-N, it-3
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello, I'm Klein Muçi! I'm an administrator and interface administrator on SqWiki and SqQuote. I've been a member of the wiki community for around 8 years now and gradually I've levitated towards the technical side of the project. Given that the Albanian wiki community is a small one and the tech-savvy community is even smaller, I tend to look after everything tech-related including extensions, tools, modules, bots (I have an approved ToolForge account), system messages, edit filters and interface changes in regard to projects standardization and new-user friendly optimization. I do enjoy taking part in global discussions and I've been part of some of those on here (Meta) regarding auto-translations for system messages, talk page infrastructure, Abstract Wikipedia/Wikilambda and most importantly the support of module/template globalization. I spend much time with citations infrastructure myself (most of my interactions with the EnWiki community are in regard to that concept and the responsible module, CS1) so M/T globalization is a project I'm much fond of because of that. In the Albanian community, I've been part of many physical wiki workshops and edit-a-thones where I offered technical support on different wiki subjects, starting from basic wikiediting to concepts related to Wikidata. Now I'm eager to interact in a bigger scale regarding standardization projects and to generally learn more about other wiki communities. I can interact in English (and of course in Albanian) in a native level. I also know Italian in a decent manner. This is my first time submitting myself as a Steward candidate so the overall text template might appear strange to the eyes of more veteran users here as I'm not yet familiar with the procedures or technical templates for that. (I would greatly appreciate some help.) If elected, I'd use the opportunity to learn more about the global wiki community and hopefully help small wikis (preferably Wikipedia's sister projects) to catch up with bigger ones on technical aspects and crystallize their active wiki communities better. Hopefully even my community (Albanian) indirectly by encouraging them to be more active on global discussions (even though we're a small wiki) given that they would have users who would be in the positions of Stewards. Trying to help in making the global language-barrier thinner on a technical aspect is also a sort of resolution (hence the support for module/template globalization). Of course I'd also volunteer on helping on general Stewards' duties when possible. - Klein Muçi (talk) 02:29, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2021/Questions#Klein Muçi


  YesEdit

  1. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   You are one of the four candidates in this election that I've never seen before (and never had GR/GS), and your statement is tricky to understand, which I won't take against you. What led me to support you is that you are clearly clueful in your answers despite this lack of crosswiki experience. This is demostrated especially in your two answers to the questions I set for you. Your handling of the second question (the "bizarre situations" questions), while a bit unorthodox in your answer (as the only user to take a literally-minded approach towards the problem), was insightful and demostrated a good understanding on how to handle a complex situation. Hence you're getting my vote, despite the imperfections. Leaderboard (talk) 14:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  2. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   On the one hand the user lacks some cross wiki experience. On the other hand, this user is definitely capable and has good technical skills. And we need more candidates that have small-wiki roots and speak more language's than just English. The positives outweigh the lack of experience. Natuur12 (talk) 16:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  3. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   For a more diverse stewardship. dwf² 01:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  4. Elliot321 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   I'd have no concerns about the user becoming a steward, given their experience and answers. Elliot321 (talk) 04:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  5. Wiwik P (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Wiwik P (talk) 01:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  6. Esc0fans (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2021   Esc0fans (talk) 10:19, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  7. NickK (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Albanian community has a good reputation in the CEE from the technical point of view, and Klein Muçi seems to be among the most experienced people from the community. I think the experience is relevant, and the qualification is sufficient — NickK (talk) 12:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  8. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Agree with Natuur12. Daniuu (talk) 17:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  9. Arianit (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   I have seen Klein's passion and dedication at helping the Albanian language Wikipedia and other projects. I'm convinced Klein can be an asset to the broader community. He has my full support. Arianit (talk) 21:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  10. Whiteguru (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   On the one hand the user lacks some cross wiki experience. On the other hand, this user is definitely capable and has good technical skills - worth giving them the experience Whiteguru (talk) 10:09, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  11. Liridon (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Agree with above supporters Liridon (talk) 08:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
       Puntori (Not eligible, checked by ZabeMath)   Agree with all supporters! The rest of the experience is coming with the time and engagement. Puntori (talk) 10:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  12. Ahmetlii (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   although the user's crosswiki knowledge is not so much as pointed before, I think that they deserve a chance for it. I also think that they're familiar with what should they handle the difficult and different problems. Ahmetlii (talk) 15:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  13. Chz (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   why not Chz (talk) 16:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  14. Abbas dhothar (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Abbas dhothar (talk) 18:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
       Cosnahang (Not eligible, checked by ZabeMath)   Cosnahang (talk) 19:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  15. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   ArdiPras95 (talk) 21:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  16. Alexdoherty4 (Eligible, checked by 94rain)2021   Alexdoherty4 (talk) 03:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  17. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 14:35, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  18. Zezen (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Mostly due to the reason stated in the discussion below (in the No votes). Zezen (talk) 21:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  19. Fernando de Gorocica (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Fernando de Gorocica (talk) 22:29, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  20. Carsrac (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Carsrac (talk) 08:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  21. Ponor (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Because of Klein's enthusiasm. Not every steward needs to come from a steward bubble; some fresh (and small-wiki) blood would be good to have. Ponor (talk) 14:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  22. Csisc (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Csisc (talk) 17:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  23. (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   -- (talk) 16:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  24. M.Tarnowski (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   M.Tarnowski (talk) 18:17, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  25. Luensu1959 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   I strongly support people from small Wikis Luensu1959 (talk) 22:12, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  26. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   MZaplotnik(talk) 00:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  27. Юрко Градовський (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Юрко Градовський (talk) 13:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  28. Jmbranum (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   I support this candidacy largely because of the candidate's experience on a smaller wiki, which I think will be helpful.Jmbranum (talk) 18:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  29. Teles (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Pelo dito por LeaderBoard. Não conhecia seu trabalho, mas gostei das respostas e acho que poderia começar devagar e ser ajudado pelos demais no início. Caso não seja eleito, espero vê-lo no próximo ano por aqui. —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 14:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  30. Majavah (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Per Ponor and my experience with working with Klein before. Majavah (talk!) 06:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  31. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Gereon K. (talk) 23:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  32. Mattia Luigi Nappi (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   sNappyML 22:13, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  33. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Octahedron80 (talk) 09:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  34. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Ciao • Bestoernesto 03:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  35. Ai24 (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021  --Ai24 (talk) 06:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC) (think I am eligible, but please cross-check, thank you)
    You are eligible indeed. Leaderboard (talk) 08:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  36. YaganZ (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   YaganZ (talk) 19:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  37. Coffins (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   Coffins (talk) 21:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  38. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   per Jusjih. ——SerialNumber54129 17:04, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  39. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Novak Watchmen (talk) 23:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  40. Base (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Kind of moral support vote at this point. I do hope that you get involved in conventional xwiki areas and with this together will pass next time or so. Base (talk) 12:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

  NoEdit

  1. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021   My rule of thumb is that all stewards should have some functionary and GR experience. You fail both those criterias. In addition to that, your response saying "You can't be trusted if you have no proof of your work and you can't have good proof of your work if you don't have the privileges to do the said work. Stewards are one of the only groups that allow for elections in the way they do and are more open to discussions overall." is really concerning to me. There are a lot of ways to get involved in xwiki patrol, or other areas of steward interest. A steward candidate should know them. Sincerely, Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  2. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Makes a good impression and seems to have useful technical knowledge, but low cross-wiki experience gives me pause. MF-W 14:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  3. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Not enough cross-wiki experience, maybe next year? Stryn (talk) 14:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  4. AGK (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Per Martin Urbanec AGK ■ 14:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  5. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   As above, good technical experience, trusted user, and good answers to questions. But some cross-wiki experience is needed for this role, or at least an understanding of how the movement operates outside your home project. All (or at least most) of a stewards' work is away from their home projects. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  6. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   A bit light on x-wiki interaction, would suggest engaging via a process such as SWMT and may support next year. — xaosflux Talk 14:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  7. ImprovedWikiImprovment (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Not convinced. --IWI (talk) 14:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  8. -revi (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Fails User:-revi/SEV#3. — regards, Revi 15:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  9. Uncitoyen (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   No enough cross-wiki activity. Maybe he/she may be a better candidate in the future. Also I would like to thank you for being the 2. most active admin of your home wiki in this year, from your election in May 2020. --Uncitoyentalk 15:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
      CommentI'm not sure if comments are allowed during the voting (if not, of course, please remove) but I felt that I needed to make a clarification about myself. I've mentioned it quite some times now during the questions phase that rollbacking (assuming that's what it is meant with GR) is out of my main interest in my overall wiki experience and would be the same in my Steward interest, if I was elected. That's why I haven't tried to be part of SWMT or anything of the same sort and probably never will. That is not something I'm trying to hide. It's a fact I've said plainly in the past and I'm repeating it now. Maybe Global Sysops privileges would have helped me more in my interests, as mentioned in my presentation and answers, but the implications of lack of overall wiki/Meta knowledge because I haven't dealt with vandalism in the past looks a bit bizarre to me. If I'm allowed to put it more in a vulgar way, what's the point of faking some interest/work on anti-vandalism just to appear more "charismatic" during voting if I never take interest/work on that after being elected (especially after saying clearly that it wouldn't be my main priority on my interests)? An argument of the sort "anti-vandalism duty experience is mandatory and you lack that so you're not trustworthy enough" would be better than the many arguments implicating I have yet to learn about anti-vandalism, because my wikiwork has rarely dealt with it even on my homewikis (appart from dealing with the edit filters). - Klein Muçi (talk) 15:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  10. ElHef (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   No demonstrated need for the tools. Stewardship isn't a tool to learn about the global WMF community. A steward should already know about the global community and assisting small wikis prior to putting the hat on. There are plenty of ways to assist small wikis that don't involve SWMT or stewardship - you can read and participate in village pumps on any project you'd like without having a steward flag. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 16:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
    What you write is true theoretically. Practically, there are 2 reasons which sort of halt the progress in situations like these:
    Without a certain flag you risk getting ignored most of the time in your offerings, especially in small Wikis which don't have pretty dynamic (to say the least) village pumps. I don't know what your personal experience is on these cases but in general, certain user talk pages are way more dynamic than the village pumps;
    Like many of us, I'm already an admin (and i-admin) on 2 Wiki projects. As Uncitoyen mentioned above, I'm one of the most active admins/users there. If I was elected, I'd make new arrangements on my daily schedule that allow me to dedicate myself to both privileges given and if I couldn't, I'd ask for help from some of the other admins at my homewikis to delegate some of the sysop duties to them. I can't make these changes pre-emptively and take "global missions" "on my own" because I don't know what new arrangements to make exactly (especially the duty delegation part which is really weird to act on if it was randomly). Now, if you'd have suggested to have a GS flag instead of a steward one, then yes, I'd agree with you. (This is literally the first thing I discuss on the first question I was asked.) But proposing to start making changes globally without any global flag looks really hard to pull of in practice. This is the sort of vicious cycle I mentioned in my answers which you fall to in these cases. But I do understand the lack of trust so I can't argue much more than this with it. - Klein Muçi (talk) 12:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
    I am a strong proponent of the idea that a person should be given the jobs that they're already doing (to the extent possible with the tools they possess). Stewardship is not a badge that grants you access to the global community. It's a set of tools to be used by someone who is already active in that community. I have no doubt that you're doing great work in the Albanian community, but you need to be more active xwiki before I would vote to entrust you with any global toolkit, whether that be GR, GS, or steward. This has nothing to do with the size of the project you call home - I would have the same response to anyone had they not made more steps to participate in the wider global community. I'm sorry, but I stand by my vote. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 20:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
    Yes, of course, don't worry about the vote per se. I was invested especially in your argument because I'm interested in that subject generally. I've talked about it a bit even on my questions, what Martin Urbanec referenced in the first vote. I haven't elaborated in detail about that because I believe it would require a discussion on its own but in general, personally, I hold the opposite viewpoint regarding what you just said. I fully understand that we must gain the trust of new users somehow before giving them privileges but I don't like the vicious cycles that usually start in these cases (again, what was referenced by Martin Urbanec). I feel better saying something like "you must get involved more with the community to gain their trust" than asking them to already de facto do the job before de jure getting privileges for it. Sure, sometimes that's easy enough to do and when that happens it's a great thing for all parties involved but on many other cases, the whole thing manifests itself as a barrier with a cryptic ad infinitum regressing saying similar to the joke "you need experience for a job but you need a job for experience". I can actually go on more about this because it's a subject I enjoy discussing, as I said, but it would shift us away from the voting process so... - Klein Muçi (talk) 22:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  11. MrJaroslavik (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Who are you? MrJaroslavik (talk) 16:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
    Not the candidate, but I find this a disappointing, and even rude, response. Leaderboard (talk) 09:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
    Yes, thank you, Leaderboard! It's really uncivil to give oneliners like these after we take the time to answer questions in a thorough manner. Even just a vote without a reason would be better than what you wrote. - Klein Muçi (talk) 11:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
    This is a rather rude response, and disappointing considering it was written by a member of the Ombuds Commission. MrJaroslavik, Klein is an admin on two projects with 7 years of contributing history. You can see that, and it was patently unnecessary to word your comment in this manner. If you intend to say that their presence on the global scene is inadequate for what you’d expect of a steward candidate, you should probably have said that plainly rather than writing a message liable to be taken as an insult. Best, Vermont (talk) 13:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
    Hello @Vermont and Klein Muçi: and others.
    Hmm, I already wrote it, I cannot change it, but I didn't want to be rude. I just wanted to point out that I had never heard of this candidate. But I apologize, and next time I will think over if my message cannot be understood otherwise. Thank you, sinrecely--MrJaroslavik (talk) 13:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
    FYI, your curt comment made me vote yes here. Zezen (talk) 21:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
    @Zezen Hey, while I agree the original comment isn't very ideal, and is uncivil as called out; however, they apologized. Do you have to really make a w:en:WP:POINT vote? Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
    That is a valid comment @Camouflaged Mirage (talk and I thank you for that. However, as I commented in the vote itself (cf. hereinabove), it was but a partial reason, as I had checked the candidate's background itself, time permitting. Indeed, my very comment here looks unCIVIL itself now, the day after. So as not to unduly continue this topic here, please post on my Talk in private should you wish so. Zezen (talk) 10:56, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  12. Kizule (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Kizule (talk) 16:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  13. SQL (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   SQLQuery me! 16:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  14. Pppery (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   * Pppery * it has begun 16:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  15. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Thanks for volunteering but there is a need for more crosswiki experience for this role. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  16. BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   BrunoBoehmler (talk) 18:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  17. Holmium (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Holmium (talk) 19:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  18. Samuele2002 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Insufficient cross-wiki experience Samuele2002 (Talk!) 21:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  19. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   "I'd use the opportunity to learn more about the global wiki community"?! Please do that first. ToBeFree (talk) 22:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  20. JavaHurricane (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   needs more xwiki experience. A year or two later perhaps? JavaHurricane 02:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  21. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2021   cyrfaw (talk) 08:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  22. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Not enough cross-wiki experience. Perhaps later. –Ejs-80 10:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  23. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   not enough cross-wiki experience Johannnes89 (talk) 11:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  24. Michel Bakni (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Michel Bakni (talk) 17:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  25. Imetsia (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Imetsia (talk) 18:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  26. OhKayeSierra (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   OhKayeSierra (talk) 19:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  27. Des Vallee (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Per all above, great contributor maybe get more cross wiki experience, if you are a steward you are a god, extremely powerful, perhaps too powerful. All boxes must be checked. Des Vallee (talk) 21:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  28. Patrik L. (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Patrik L. (talk) 22:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  29. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Dostojewskij (talk) 23:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  30. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   concerns with limited x-wiki experience FASTILY 02:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  31. Mirer (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Mirer (talk) 05:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  32. MJL (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Per Martin Urbanec. –MJLTalk 06:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  33. MarioJump83 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Lack of cross-wiki experience. MarioJump83! 08:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  34. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2021   O.Koslowski (talk) 10:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  35. Gripweed (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Gripweed (talk) 10:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  36. Tucoxn (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2021   Insufficient cross-wiki experience. - tucoxn\talk 15:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  37. John M Wolfson (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Per all. John M Wolfson (talk) 17:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  38. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Did not answer my question to oversight false vanishing, or I might have voted yes. Jusjih (talk) 23:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
    I'm sorry but I couldn't understand thoroughly your question, as many other candidates said, even after reading your proposal. The "condemning" part was really confusing. Were it another subject I'd have asked for more explanation but in that case, that was one of those requests that, even if I was a steward I'd kindly have let someone else to deal with given that the vanishing part is not something I've put much interest in the past myself (I've only gone as far as to deal with rename requests). The fact that none of the Albanian wiki projects have oversighters, check users, ArbCom, etc. (like any other small wiki) also plays a role on this. Just explaining so I don't risk appearing rude in your eyes for not participating in that discussion. :) - Klein Muçi (talk) 03:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  39. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   – Ammarpad (talk) 10:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  40. Kudpung (Eligible, checked by Perryprog)2021   Kudpung (talk) 12:57, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  41. PoetVeches (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   PoetVeches (talk) 13:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  42. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021    Klaas `Z4␟` V:  21:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  43. Iluvatar (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Iluvatar (talk) 23:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  44. 20041027 tatsu (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   20041027 tatsu (talk) 15:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  45. Juan90264 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Juan90264 (talk) 17:32, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  46. Cairo2k18 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Cairo2k18(talk)(contribs) 06:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  47. Taivo (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   You said correctly: "You can't be trusted if you have no proof of your work". You have no crosswiki activity, even I have more. You spoke about helping small wikis without steward tools and this is what you must do. If you come after two years and say: this is how I helped small wikis, but with steward tools I could help them more, then I will support you. Taivo (talk) 10:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  48. Mahedi181 (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Mahedi Hasan (talk) 11:25, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  49. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021  --Roland Kutzki (talk) 15:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  50. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   *Youngjin (talk) 04:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  51. Mercy (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Mercy (talk) 11:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  52. JLavigne508 (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   JLavigne508 (talk) 13:50, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  53. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Ameisenigel (talk) 09:47, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  54. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   seems like a very unique individual but the cross-wikiness is what puts me here. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 14:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  55. Amorymeltzer (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Basically per Martin ~ Amory (utc) 19:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  56. WikiAviator (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   WikiAviator (talk) 02:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  57. Guerillero (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Guerillero Parlez Moi 04:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  58. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Misses the point of stewardship. Jasper Deng (talk) 06:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  59. P,TO 19104 (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   per ElHef. P,TO 19104 (talk) 16:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  60. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  61. Bradv (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   – bradv🍁 20:05, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  62. ZI Jony (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 06:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  63. Masti (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   masti <talk> 18:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  64. Nadzik (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Nadzik (talk) 08:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

  NeutralEdit

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Sadly, I think the elections process does tend to disadvantage candidates who don't come from wikis large enough to have CU/OS. That being said, I don't see enough experience especially in terms of policy to where I feel comfortable supporting. Rschen7754 14:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  2. Zblace (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Agree with the above. Maybe worth retry next year or soon after... Zblace (talk) 14:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  3. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Agree with Rschen completely. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  4. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   I agree with Rschen7754. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  5. Minorax (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   per Rschen7754 Minorax (talk) 15:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  6. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Miniapolis 16:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  7. Miraclepine (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Agree with everyone here. ミラP@Miraclepine 16:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  8. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021   per Rschen7754. CptViraj (talk) 16:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  9. Mirisa56 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Mirisa56 (talk) 03:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  10. 痛心疾首 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   痛心疾首 (talk) 04:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  11. Nurtenge (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Nurtenge (talk) 07:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  12. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  13. Joseywales1961 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Joseywales1961 (talk) 13:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  14. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Not voting No as they are technically-minded and come from a smaller community (which is always welcome). Spend some time on global contributions and run again next year. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 18:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  15. DraconicDark (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   This user has good reasons to want to be steward, and having stewards from smaller communities is good, but the lack of cross-wiki experience is a bit of a problem. DraconicDark (talk) 20:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  16. Geonuch (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Geonuch (talk) 01:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  17. Blue Sonic (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Blue Sonic (talk) 02:19, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  18. Giraffer (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Giraffer (talk) 14:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  19. SK2242 (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2021   SK2242 (talk) 18:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  20. Packa (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Packa (talk) 21:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  21. Florian COLLIN (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Florian COLLIN (talk) 22:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  22. Impartial just (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   I think he/she need to contribute more on other wiki. (lack of cross-wiki) And looking forward you to edit Sqnews. ℑ𝔪𝔭𝔞𝔯𝔱𝔦𝔞𝔩 𝔧𝔲𝔰𝔱🎙️ 01:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
    He. Unfortunately, SqNews is the trickiest wiki project to keep alive as it is supposed to be the most dynamic one. My initial plan was to jumpstart SqQuote and to go deal with SqSource (currently not really a Sq domain). Sadly, SqQuote failed to get new volunteers to keep it on its tracks, despite my enormous "marketing campaigns" and it is currently maintained only by 2 users (me and another Albanian user). Given that I couldn't find volunteers helping on SqQuote to write/translate articles monthly, SqNews became something unthinkable to deal with, especially after having suffered a soft closure in the past. Even dealing with SqSource was put to a halt because of the same reasons. There is only so much a single person and automation can do. Without other human volunteers it is impossible to run a wiki properly, no matter the dedication. - Klein Muçi (talk) 03:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  23. Veracious (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Veracious (talk) 14:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  24. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Per others. Please don't be discouraged - I look forward to seeing your future cross-wiki work. Hiàn (talk) 19:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  25. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Cbyd (talk) 10:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
       Toad62 (Not eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)   Toad62 (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  26. KPX8 (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   KPX8 (talk) 00:01, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  27. Dylsss (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Dylsss (talk) 09:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  28. Sun8908 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Sun8908 (talk) 11:08, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  29. علاء (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Agree with Rschen --Alaa :)..! 17:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  30. CanadianToast (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   CanadianToast (talk) 21:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  31. Mykola7 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Mykola7 (talk) 21:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  32. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   ~Cybularny Speak? 20:11, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  33. Sj (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Would love to see you spend time discussing more cross-wiki policies –SJ talk  03:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  34. AVSmalnad77 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   AVSmalnad77 talk 07:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  35. Santasa99 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Experience - someone said s a n t a | t a l k | p i t 09:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  36. Zabia (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Zabia (talk) 09:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  37. Gampe (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Gampe (talk) 10:41, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  38. Saroj Uprety (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Saroj Uprety (talk) 06:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  39. DePlusJean (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   As much, I am sincerely convinced of the good work accomplished these last three years by Klein Muçi (Wikiscan and Xtools). As much, I have a doubt as much as to disperse in other additional tasks among the eleven administrators (Statistics and list of administrators). DePlusJean (talk) 14:14, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  40. Jules* (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Very small cross-wiki experience. — Jules Talk 11:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  41. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021   Rzuwig 11:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  42. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Darkhan 17:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  43. SMcCandlish (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Mainly due to lack of cross-wiki experience. I would be in the "support" camp in next time if this changed. I agree with supporters that this is a good "tech editor", but that's not really much of a Steward criterion.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  20:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  44. Paradise Chronicle (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Maybe not this year, but seeing their resilience, they sure can make it, if this is the goal.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  45. Tks4Fish (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 17:54, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  46. NK1406 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   I agree with Rschen7754. NK1406 (talk) 01:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  47. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   as per Rschen7754. –Davey2010Talk 17:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  48. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   DannyS712 (talk) 22:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  49. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   Dash77 (talk) 01:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  50. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   OlEnglish (Talk) 13:06, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  51. Mrschimpf (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Mrschimpf (talk) 04:41, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  52. Robert McClenon (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Robert McClenon (talk) 05:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  53. Robert Važan (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   — Robert Važan (talk) 05:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  54. Charitwo (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Charitwo (talk) 22:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 

The 2021 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Lofty abyssEdit

  • Languages: en-4, mt, it-2 (at a very basic level I can also understand most Romance languages)
  • Personal info: (English)
    I was a steward in the past, but I made some mistakes, for which I apologize. I am, though, hoping to ask for another chance at continuing; for the last two years since not having the tools I have kept crosswiki monitoring, with a bit of assistance from global rollback, but it gets frustrating when LTAs or casual wiki-hopping vandals keep disrupting when no one who could stop them is around, and just rolling their edits back only works temporarily. I primarily dealt with spambots when I could lock them, and for the past two years I still reported them. I also handled the aforementioned long-term disruptors, but currently I block them locally where I could, before informing others (along with the usual sysop vandalism etc. blocks/deletions, whereas on small wikis it's just reversions/taggings).

    I've generally been a gnome throughout the fifteen years I've been registered, fixing markup and typos along with the administrative tasks mentioned above, and I also like keeping an eye on otrs' info-en queue, while responding to oversight/suppression requests too. I've always welcomed feedback on any of my actions, and while two years ago there seemed to be some miscommunication, I'd still like to ask anyone for feedback at any time of the year, as one can only improve and ameliorate through such assessments.

    If given another chance I will strive to avoid the mistakes committed in the past, and would hope that they weren't the kind that would preclude the possibility of another chance. I mostly dealt with the spambot problem (by also checkusering to find bot farms), and would be interested to continue doing so, along with SRP/SRG etc. I think I can be more effective with the tools than I am currently. Please go through my logs (1, 2, 5000 entries each) if desired, but I hope that, even if there are mistakes among them, I can become better in the future.

    Thanks. ~Lofty abyss 23:52, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2021/Questions#Lofty_abyss


  YesEdit

  1. AGK (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Many of the concerns appear to be overblown. AGK ■ 14:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  2. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   I agree with AGK here. I was pretty annoyed with LA's wikilawyering at the confirmations a couple years back, but my main concern there was inactivity and unwillingness to engage. He's since been pretty active, and he was always good at the mindlessly locking spambots stuff. No concerns from me. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  3. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   He never should have been removed to begin with. He shot himself in the foot with the wikilawyering, but the underlying concerns were not enough to merit removal. This is unlikely to pass, but I continue to disapprove of how the removal was handled, so I’ll be here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  4. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021   Per Tony Praxidicae (talk) 18:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  5. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  6. Wiwik P (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Wiwik P (talk) 01:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  7. NickK (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Mostly moral support because I think steward rights should not have been removed the last time. But I do not appreciate the behaviour that followed — NickK (talk) 12:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  8. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Jusjih (talk) 23:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  9. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Hiàn (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  10. Alexdoherty4 (Eligible, checked by 94rain)2021   Alexdoherty4 (talk) 03:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  11. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Vituzzu (talk) 17:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  12. علاء (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   --Alaa :)..! 17:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  13. Nehaoua (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Nehaoua (talk) 22:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  14. Csisc (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Csisc (talk) 17:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  15. Bff (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Bff (talk) 19:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  16. Wim b (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Wim b 14:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  17. M.Tarnowski (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   M.Tarnowski (talk) 18:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  18. Юрко Градовський (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Юрко Градовський (talk) 13:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  19. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Shizhao (talk) 01:49, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  20. Érico (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Érico (talk) 00:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  21. Rashid Jorvee (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Rashid Jorvee (talk) 12:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  22. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Ciao • Bestoernesto 03:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  23. User3749 (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   User3749 (talk) 08:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  24. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   Dash77 (talk) 01:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
       VKG1985 (Not eligible, checked by ZabeMath)   VKG1985 (talk) 12:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  25. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   OlEnglish (Talk) 13:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  26. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   The oppose votes are basically rehashing the whole confirmation thing (during which IIRC I voted against theirs, vocally); but the allegations weren't so egregious that they never had another chnace. Not only is it there right to request, but I think the project should be wary of shooting itself in the foot just for the sake of ancient histrionics. ——SerialNumber54129 17:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  27. Charitwo (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Per Ajr and Tony Charitwo (talk) 22:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  28. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Novak Watchmen (talk) 23:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  29. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   --Marshallsumter (talk) 02:33, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

  NoEdit

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Notwithstanding the previous rights discussions, the begging to be a steward in the statement is, quite frankly, an embarrassment. Rschen7754 14:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  2. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Not convinced; still harping on how the removal of steward rights in 2019 only happened because he didn't know the MultiLock tool existed, which is definitely a too creative interpretation of what happened. MF-W 14:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  3. Naleksuh (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   For all the same reasons your request for global sysop failed 3 months ago in Steward_requests/Global_permissions/2020-10#Global_sysop_for_Lofty_abyss Naleksuh (talk) 14:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  4. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Herby talk thyme 14:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  5. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Unfit for the role, as also the off-the-point answers on the 'Questions' page once again impressively show. --Vogone (talk) 14:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  6. Tks4Fish (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 14:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  7. Savh (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   Not aware of why he was not confirmed (blames MultiLock), still doing the minimum to seem 'active'. Savhñ 14:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  8. ImprovedWikiImprovment (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Per everything said at their 2019 Steward confirmation, 2020 enwiki CU request, 2020 Steward election, and Global Sysop request last October. The candidate is not particularly active even on their home wikis, and is certainly not sufficiently active cross-wiki. I would need years of sustained activity to even consider this user for a permission like steward again, and I too find it embarrassing that he is once again requesting steward without changing at all. He also neglects to mention in either his nomination statement or answers to questions the actual reason he was removed as steward (and no, it was nothing to do with a creation of a tool). Permissions are not meant to be collected, and that is what this appears like to me. --IWI (talk) 14:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  9. Miraclepine (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   ミラP@Miraclepine 14:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  10. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021   No, per his last global sysop candidature and SE2020 candidature. Per others as well. Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  11. Blablubbs (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Insufficient recent activity, and their answer to my question did not inspire confidence. Blablubbs (talk) 14:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  12. 4nn1l2 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   4nn1l2 (talk) 14:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  13. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Stryn (talk) 14:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  14. Majavah (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Majavah (talk!) 14:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  15. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   — xaosflux Talk 14:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  16. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Has demonstrated multiple times to be unfit for this position. KPFC💬 15:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  17. Spicy (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Spicy (talk) 15:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  18. -revi (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Fails User:-revi/SEV#4.2 — regards, Revi 15:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  19. Uncitoyen (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   I think he/she isn't ready for stewardship right now. I agree with all the other negative comments. --Uncitoyentalk 15:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  20. Minorax (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Minorax (talk) 15:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
       Улюбленець поїздів (Not eligible, checked by ZabeMath)   I don't think for this user. Улюбленець поїздів (talk) 15:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  21. ElHef (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Answers to questions are perfunctory at best and do not indicate they understand the community's concerns. I'm particularly unimpressed with the examples of complex OTRS tickets. From what I can see, activity has actually decreased year-over-year since the last round of steward elections, when activity was a concern as well. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 15:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  22. Taivo (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   You are administrator in Commons, but your last 50 edits still go back until 2015. You do not use even the tools you have, you do not need new tools. Taivo (talk) 16:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  23. Barkeep49 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Clearly desires to hold high permissions but doesn't seem to accept the responsibility that comes with this (see previous Steward discussions, and enwiki CUOS application/discussion). Barkeep49 (talk) 16:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  24. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Has been a Commons admin for a long time apparently, but yet I've never seen him/her in any admin related area's. Natuur12 (talk) 16:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  25. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Miniapolis 16:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  26. GeneralNotability (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Per above, especially Barkeep49 and Martin. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  27. Vermont (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   I'd probably have supported if your statement was accurate. They weren't mistakes, they were a decade of inactivity with no intention to be involved in the community followed by a series of emotional outbursts when editors opposed your confirm. It wasn't that you missed a tool coming out, it was a marked lack of community participation. In the confirm I contested back in 2019, you gave 5 different and mutually exclusive explanations for why you were not active: your computer was broken, you lost IRC client config files, you didn't know about MultiLock, you lost interest in Wikimedia, and that you hadn't been inactive. I'm happy you've finally settled on one, but it's not a good one. The pattern of collecting hats and not using them has also continued. Vermont (talk) 16:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  28. SQL (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   SQLQuery me! 16:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  29. Pppery (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   * Pppery * it has begun 17:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  30. ProcrastinatingReader (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 17:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  31. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   I will say, since last year, Lofty had been improving in activity, albeit still in low side. I am inclined to vote neutral for them until I see the mention of multi-lock, the issue isn't not using multi-lock, the issue isn't a single spambot but to block the underlying range. They seems unable to recognize the root cause of the issues. Sadly and regrettably Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  32. L235 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   KevinL (aka L235 · t) 18:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  33. BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   BrunoBoehmler (talk) 18:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
       Улюбленець поїздів (Not eligible, checked by ZabeMath)   Because, this user is not ready to be a steward Улюбленець поїздів (talk) 18:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  34. Kusurija (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Kusurija (talk) 19:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  35. Samuele2002 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Samuele2002 (Talk!) 21:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  36. Nguyentrongphu (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Hat-collector. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 21:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  37. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   ToBeFree (talk) 22:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  38. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   dwf² 01:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  39. JavaHurricane (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Continued hat-collecting concerns. JavaHurricane 01:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  40. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by -akko)2021   ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 03:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  41. Elliot321 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Their nomination mentioned previous issues with the role but not what they are - giving me pause about whether they should have it restored. Elliot321 (talk) 04:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  42. Nurtenge (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Nurtenge (talk) 07:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  43. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2021   cyrfaw (talk) 08:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  44. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Johannnes89 (talk) 11:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  45. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Steward_requests/Global_permissions/2020-10#Global_sysop_for_Lofty_abyss 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 18:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  46. Imetsia (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Imetsia (talk) 18:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  47. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   The number of requests for permissions is concerning. Focus on using the tools you already have. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 18:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  48. OhKayeSierra (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Unsatisfied with answers to questions so far OhKayeSierra (talk) 19:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  49. Patrik L. (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Patrik L. (talk) 22:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  50. Geonuch (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Geonuch (talk) 01:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  51. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   concerns with activity levels and recently failed GS request FASTILY 02:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  52. Saroj Uprety (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Saroj Uprety (talk) 02:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  53. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Esteban16 (talk) 02:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  54. Mirer (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Mirer (talk) 05:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  55. MJL (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   I supported both the request for Global Sysop and 2020 Steward candidacy of Lofty abyss. However, they seem to keep requesting advanced rights regardless if they even have a need. That really needs to stop, and I would like to see at least one full year where Lofty abyss isn't running for something. –MJLTalk 06:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  56. MarioJump83 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Serious hat collecting problems. MarioJump83! 08:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  57. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2021   O.Koslowski (talk) 10:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  58. Gripweed (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Gripweed (talk) 10:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  59. Giraffer (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   No. Giraffer (talk) 14:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  60. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Per statements above. Daniuu (talk) 16:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  61. John M Wolfson (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   With great reluctance, but your answers to questions do not inspire confidence. John M Wolfson (talk) 17:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  62. SK2242 (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2021   Inactive. SK2242 (talk) 18:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  63. Impartial just (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Well. Lack of cross-wiki experience. I think you can edit Enwikinews or other English small wikis more. ℑ𝔪𝔭𝔞𝔯𝔱𝔦𝔞𝔩 𝔧𝔲𝔰𝔱🎙️ 01:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  64. Whiteguru (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Inactive Whiteguru (talk) 10:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  65. Kudpung (Eligible, checked by Perryprog)2021   per Barkeep49 Kudpung (talk) 13:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  66. PoetVeches (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   PoetVeches (talk) 13:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  67. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   ArdiPras95 (talk) 21:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  68. KPX8 (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   KPX8 (talk) 00:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  69. Jon Kolbert (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  70. 20041027 tatsu (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   20041027 tatsu (talk) 15:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  71. Dylsss (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Dylsss (talk) 16:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  72. Juan90264 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Juan90264 (talk) 17:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  73. Zezen (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   As per Vermont and MJL's arguments above. Zezen (talk) 21:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  74. CanadianToast (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   CanadianToast (talk) 21:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  75. Cairo2k18 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   As per Vermont. Cairo2k18(talk)(contribs) 06:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  76. Gobonobo (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   gobonobo + c 07:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  77. Elizium23 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Elizium23 (talk) 01:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  78. Jmbranum (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   The candidate's lack of candor regarding past issues is a problem for me. Making mistakes is part of learning, but the second part of that learning requires reflection and action. Jmbranum (talk) 18:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  79. Santasa99 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   per Vermont s a n t a | t a l k | p i t 09:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  80. AVSmalnad77 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Per Vermont AVSmalnad77 talk 08:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  81. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021   Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  82. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021   Rzuwig 11:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  83. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021  --Roland Kutzki (talk) 15:02, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  84. SMcCandlish (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Once bitten, twice shy.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  20:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  85. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   *Youngjin (talk) 04:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  86. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Octahedron80 (talk) 09:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  87. Mercy (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Mercy (talk) 11:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  88. Steindy (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   --Steindy (talk) 20:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  89. NK1406 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   NK1406 (talk) 01:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  90. JLavigne508 (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   JLavigne508 (talk) 13:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  91. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Per Rschen7754 - Obvious hat-collection. Also not happy with the answers to the "mistake" either. Not to sound harsh but shouldn't Lofty just be disqualified from hereon in? (it'd be like me running RFA at EN every bloody year .... would become boring and tiresome not only for myself but for fellow editors too). –Davey2010Talk 17:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
    We've had one that tried to become a steward for 6 consecutive elections, so... Leaderboard (talk) 14:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
    Really ? wow!, Well don't worry - Lofty will overtake that record.... sad part is I'm not even joking. –Davey2010Talk 21:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  92. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Ameisenigel (talk) 09:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  93. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   I'm not confident —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 14:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  94. Coffins (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   Coffins (talk) 21:36, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  95. WikiAviator (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   WikiAviator (talk) 02:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  96. Guerillero (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Guerillero Parlez Moi 04:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  97. Mrschimpf (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Mrschimpf (talk) 04:42, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  98. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:11, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  99. Bradv (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   – bradv🍁 20:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  100. Robert McClenon (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Robert McClenon (talk) 05:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  101. ZI Jony (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 06:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  102. Kallichore (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   --Kallichore (talk) 21:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  103. Nadzik (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Nadzik (talk) 08:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

  NeutralEdit

  1. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  2. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021   I can't decide. CptViraj (talk) 16:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  3. Kizule (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   I can't decide too. Kizule (talk) 16:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  4. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   I can only quote my vote from your GS request 3 months ago: "Sysop on a number of wikis and a steward for nearly a decade. They have experience and can be trusted to not misuse the tools. The concern is - according to the logs - they seem to have a history of being rarely active with the tools outside of enwiki. And i don't see much improvement (e. g. they have sysop rights on Commons and they haven't made even a 100 edits there in 8 years). So I have my doubts about this and I'm not really excited to promote, but I am also not opposing.". Nothing really changed in this 3 months. To the point that even my comment on your Commons activity (less than 100 edits in 8 years) will soon become factually incorrect 'cause it'll be "less than 100 edits in 9 years"... Meiræ 07:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  5. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Less than 200 edits in 2020, and GS/R is how you should got more experience. GZWDer (talk) 13:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  6. Joseywales1961 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Joseywales1961 (talk) 13:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  7. Michel Bakni (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Michel Bakni (talk) 17:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  8. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Dostojewskij (talk) 23:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  9. Blue Sonic (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Blue Sonic (talk) 02:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  10. Firestar464 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Firestar464 (talk) 11:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  11. Florian COLLIN (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Florian COLLIN (talk) 22:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  12. 94rain (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Would like to see more elaboration on "mistakes" and "miscommunication". Answers to questions are not convincing. 94rain Talk 13:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  13. Veracious (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Veracious (talk) 14:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  14. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021    Klaas `Z4␟` V:  21:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  15. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Cbyd (talk) 10:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  16. Ahmetlii (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Ahmetlii (talk) 15:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
       Toad62 (Not eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)   Toad62 (talk) 16:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  17. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Centaur271188 (talk) 17:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  18. Sun8908 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Sun8908 (talk) 11:11, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  19. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 14:37, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  20. Carsrac (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Carsrac (talk) 08:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  21. Mykola7 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Mykola7 (talk) 21:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  22. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   ~Cybularny Speak? 20:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  23. Zabia (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Zabia (talk) 09:05, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  24. Gampe (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Gampe (talk) 10:42, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  25. Teles (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Ainda tem minha confiança e acho que usaria as ferramentas adequadamente. Entretanto, acredito que precisa escolher um ou mais cargos e se desligar deles. Ainda parece não ser totalmente transparente quando questionado sobre problemas anteriores e responde como se a ferramenta MultiLock fosse a causa deles. —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 14:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  26. JamesLucas (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   JamesLucas (talk) 13:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  27. Jules* (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   — Jules Talk 11:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  28. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Darkhan 17:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  29. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   DannyS712 (talk) 22:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  30. Robert Važan (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   — Robert Važan (talk) 05:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  31. Masti (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   masti <talk> 18:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  32. Base (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   As someone who has his share of mistakes too I cannot hold the drama the candidate caused two years ago against them forever, but I am not ready to support them yet. I am happy that they stick around and are building their trust back though. Base (talk) 12:11, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 

The 2021 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Operator873Edit

  • Languages: en, es-3, it-2, pt-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Greetings and thank you for participating here. I'm Operator873. I created my acount in 2008, but was only an avid reader for many years. In 2017, I became active on the English Wikipedia. I worked mostly anti-vandalism in the beginning, but then became involved with OTRS (which I am no longer active) and ACC (with which I still serve). In June of 2018, I became active on the Simple English Wikipedia and grew to enjoy being active in global efforts. I consider the Simple English Wikipedia my home wiki. In November 2018, I stood for consideration as a sysop on the Simple English Wikipedia and was successful. In early 2020, I became a CheckUser with unanimous support.

    Globally, I work to detect and remove spam as well as the associated spambots. I am currently a Global sysop and use that tool kit in this effort. I very much enjoy working with the smaller communities and admire the dedication of those Wikipedians. I am very active on IRC. I develop Bot873 (known as GlobalSysBot on IRC) to assist the Global sysops. I use SWViewer as well as the CVN network to assist in monitoring the smaller communities. As a Steward, I would continue and expand my effort against spam, doing LWCU work, combat LTA activities (locks and gblocks), and serve the global community's requests. Like many other Stewards, I would make myself immediately available for assistance via IRC as needed.

    Thank you kindly for your consideration! Operator873talkconnect 22:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2021/Questions#Operator873


  YesEdit

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Good CU and GS experience and while newer to the global scene I think they will be a net positive. Rschen7754 14:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  2. Yining Chen (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   --Yining Chen (Talk) 14:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  3. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  4. Tks4Fish (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Great CU, with a good GS experience. Very kind and always available. Good developer, having developed really helpful tools to the steward/CU workflow, like some of the ones embedded on his bots, and some scripts that he wrote for me which were a huge help. Will definitely be a great addition to the team. —Thanks for the fish! talkcontribs 14:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  5. AGK (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   AGK ■ 14:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  6. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021   Global sysop already, will be helpful as a steward. Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  7. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   CU and GS experience, looks like a competent user. If the incivility concerns in the oppose section are true, I recommend you take a step back in those situations and evaluate your actions and responses. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  8. Sotiale (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Sotiale (talk) 15:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  9. ImprovedWikiImprovment (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   I have thought on this carefully, and I can only conclude that Operator873 has the knowledge, expertise, and experience to act very well as a Steward. I have seen the logs referred to in the "no" section, and I am not convinced they constitute incivility. On simplewiki, he is perhaps the most active at RFCU and always responds very quickly to requests. He has a high degree of technical knowledge in the area and will be able to transfer this to the steward role. I'll also add that the Simple English Wikipedia is just as valid as any other, and it certainly takes as much dedication as anywhere else to be trusted as a sysop and CU (though perhaps not enwiki; that is an outlier). --IWI (talk) 15:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  10. Barkeep49 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Very thoughtful leader. While I understand the concerns about Simple Wiki being Operator's homewiki, there is enough of a trackrecord in other spaces to show that they will handle the responsibility of being a steward well. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  11. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Could be very valuable to the current stewards team. Trijnsteltalk 16:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  12. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021   CptViraj (talk) 16:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  13. Vermont (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Having worked with Operator873 as a CU and admin on the Simple English Wikipedia, and as a GS, I believe strongly that they would be a great steward. Relevant experience, demonstrated competency, and though Operator does not have very many edits xwiki there are considerable log actions through their GS work. Vermont (talk) 16:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  14. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Xwiki activity, can be trusted with the tools, would be a positive addition. LGTM DannyS712 (talk) 16:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  15. Miraclepine (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   This took a while, but I think there aren't much concerns here. ミラP@Miraclepine 16:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  16. MrJaroslavik (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Why he got GS without x-wiki activity then? :) MrJaroslavik (talk) 16:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  17. GeneralNotability (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   In my experience, Operator has been trustworthy and competent on multiple projects. To me, being active on both enwiki and simple is indeed "cross-wikiness," though I understand why some of the no !voters below feel otherwise. I believe Operator can be trusted with the steward role and would make good use of it. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  18. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   Stryn (talk) 16:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  19. SQL (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   SQLQuery me! 16:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  20. Érico (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Érico (talk) 16:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  21. Kizule (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Kizule (talk) 16:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  22. Uncitoyen (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   He used the GS rights as much as possible. The number of wikis for global contributions may be small, but have admin operations on dozens of maybe more than a hundred wiki. see He helped with global sysop requests. Sometimes he made requests for global locks and blocks. Most of his answers also show that he understands steward rights. Therefore I think he can help for stewardship. --Uncitoyentalk 17:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  23. Aranya (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Aranya (talk) 17:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  24. Pppery (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   * Pppery * it has begun 17:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  25. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  26. L235 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   KevinL (aka L235 · t) 18:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  27. Mz7 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Net positive. Mz7 (talk) 18:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  28. BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   BrunoBoehmler (talk) 18:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  29. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Some doubts but I'm gonna trust Vermont's testimonial. Natuur12 (talk) 19:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  30. Perryprog (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021   Vermont and Tks4Fish put it quite well in my opinion. Perryprog (talk) 19:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  31. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Legoktm (talk) 21:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  32. ElHef (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Per IWI, particularly regarding the validity of contributions to simplewiki. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 22:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
  33. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   dwf² 01:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  34. JavaHurricane (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Work as GS offsets the concerns about lack of xwiki contribs. Sometimes you can't really gauge crosswiki work using the edit matrix. No concerns for me. JavaHurricane 02:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  35. Darkfrog24 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   My biggest concern for all candidates is "If given power, will this person abuse it, even if they don't think that's what they're doing?" Op's answer to the questions indicates that they know the power being given has limits. That's a good sign. Darkfrog24 (talk) 03:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  36. 痛心疾首 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   With CheckUser experience, this user can help. 痛心疾首 (talk) 03:59, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  37. Elliot321 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   While they do have somewhat limited cross-wiki experience, I personally don't see that as much of a problem as others. Elliot321 (talk) 04:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  38. Krinkle (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Krinkle (talk) 05:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  39. 游魂 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Welcome more chekusers. Yo Yan 06:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  40. AfroThundr3007730 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   — AfroThundr (u · t · c) 07:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  41. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  42. Nurtenge (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Nurtenge (talk) 07:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  43. Mirinano (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   mirinano (talk) 08:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  44. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2021   cyrfaw (talk) 08:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  45. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   per Ajraddatz. Meiræ 08:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  46. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   –Ejs-80 11:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  47. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  48. Aca (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Aca (talk) 13:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  49. Joseywales1961 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Joseywales1961 (talk) 13:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  50. Lemure Saltante (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Lemure Saltante (talk) 14:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  51. Michel Bakni (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Michel Bakni (talk) 17:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  52. باسم (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   باسم (talk) 17:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  53. Hasley (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Sgd. —Hasley 17:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  54. Imetsia (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Imetsia (talk) 18:24, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  55. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   1ForTheMoney (talk) 18:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  56. Waggie (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   This one is quite difficult for me. I've worked with Operator873 and I believe that Operator873 can manage the tools quite competently, and has the temperament required. However, while I am voting yes, but I think Tony raises some extremely valid points and would suggest that Operator873 consider this very seriously. Waggie (talk) 20:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  57. Patrik L. (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Patrik L. (talk) 22:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  58. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Dostojewskij (talk) 23:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
  59. Wiwik P (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Wiwik P (talk) 01:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  60. Geonuch (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Geonuch (talk) 01:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  61. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   FASTILY 02:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  62. Blue Sonic (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Blue Sonic (talk) 02:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  63. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Esteban16 (talk) 02:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  64. Maynich (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Maynich (talk) 05:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  65. MJL (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Operator has worked to make Wikimedia a more civil place. I certainly have not always agreed with them, but I know their heart is in what they do. –MJLTalk 05:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  66. Mirer (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Mirer (talk) 06:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  67. Kocgs (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Kocgs (talk) 08:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  68. MarioJump83 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   MarioJump83! 09:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  69. Gripweed (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Gripweed (talk) 10:44, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  70. John M Wolfson (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   John M Wolfson (talk) 17:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  71. NANöR (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   NANöR (talk) 20:08, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  72. Packa (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   Packa (talk) 21:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  73. Globalphilosophy (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   --Globalphilosophy (-̮̮̃•̃) (ღTalk ♥) 21:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
       Tfeliz (Not eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)   Tfeliz (Talk) 00:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  74. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Jusjih (talk) 23:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
  75. Impartial just (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   ℑ𝔪𝔭𝔞𝔯𝔱𝔦𝔞𝔩 𝔧𝔲𝔰𝔱🎙️ 01:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  76. جار الله (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   جار الله (talk) 02:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  77. Streetdeck (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Trusted. Good luck. --Wright Streetdeck 03:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  78. Roller26 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Roller26 (talk) 06:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  79. Stigfinnare (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Stigfinnare (talk) 09:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  80. Dylsss (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Dylsss (talk) 09:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  81. Whiteguru (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021   Looks like they will put in significant contributions. Whiteguru (talk) 10:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  82. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   – Ammarpad (talk) 11:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  83. Veracious (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Veracious (talk) 14:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  84. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Operator873 has my full trust. He's done good work over the years and I truly believe that he's more than qualified and capable to serve as a steward. Hiàn (talk) 20:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  85. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021    Klaas `Z4␟` V:  21:14, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  86. Iluvatar (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Iluvatar (talk) 23:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
  87. Ahmetlii (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Ahmetlii (talk) 16:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  88. Giraffer (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Giraffer (talk) 16:18, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  89. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   ArdiPras95 (talk) 22:00, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  90. KPX8 (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   KPX8 (talk) 23:53, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
  91. Alexdoherty4 (Eligible, checked by 94rain)2021   Alexdoherty4 (talk) 03:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  92. Sun8908 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Sun8908 (talk) 11:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  93. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 14:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  94. 20041027 tatsu (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   20041027 tatsu (talk) 15:27, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  95. Juan90264 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Juan90264 (talk) 17:29, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  96. علاء (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   --Alaa :)..! 17:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  97. Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Filipović Zoran (talk) 20:08, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  98. Nehaoua (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Nehaoua (talk) 22:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  99. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
  100. Ponor (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Ponor (talk) 08:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  101. .snoopy. (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   .snoopy. 13:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  102. Csisc (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Csisc (talk) 17:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  103. Bff (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Bff (talk) 19:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  104. Mykola7 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Mykola7 (talk) 21:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
  105. Superpes15 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Superpes15 (talk) 01:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  106. Ddxfx (Eligible, checked by -akko)2021   — Ddxfx 10:45, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  107. Wim b (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Wim b 14:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  108. Mark7747 (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   Mark7747 (talk) 15:11, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  109. Maestro Ivanković (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Maestro Ivanković 17:42, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  110. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   ~Cybularny Speak? 20:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
  111. Elizium23 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Elizium23 (talk) 01:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  112. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Infinite0694 (Talk) 02:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  113. Soundwaweserb (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  114. Юрко Градовський (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Юрко Градовський (talk) 13:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  115. Bencemac (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Bencemac (talk) 14:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  116. Jmbranum (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Jmbranum (talk) 18:39, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
  117. Zabia (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Zabia (talk) 09:04, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  118. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   MZaplotnik(talk) 15:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  119. فيصل (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   Faisal talk 05:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  120. Saroj Uprety (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Saroj Uprety (talk) 06:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  121. Tupungato (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Tupungato (talk) 09:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  122. Geraki (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021   Geraki TL 19:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  123. Raimundo Pastor (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021   Raimundo Pastor (talk) 20:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  124. Dreamy Jazz (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021   Dreamy Jazz talk to me | enwiki 22:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
  125. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Shizhao (talk) 01:50, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  126. Labdajiwa (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Labdajiwa (talk) 03:10, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  127. LuK3 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
  128. AVSmalnad77 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   --AVSmalnad77 talk 07:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  129. Tulsi Bhagat (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   I believe in him. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 10:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  130. Tolly4bolly (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   T4B (talk) 11:51, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  131. Saramag (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021   --Saramag (talk) 13:25, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  132. Wil540 art (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   🍀 Wil540 art (talk) 01:14, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  133. Nioger (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Nioger (talk) 06:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  134. DutchDevil (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2021   DutchDevil (talk) 11:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  135. Jules* (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   — Jules Talk 11:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  136. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021   Rzuwig 11:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  137. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021  --Roland Kutzki (talk) 15:03, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  138. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   Darkhan 17:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  139. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021   *Youngjin (talk) 04:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  140. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Octahedron80 (talk) 09:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  141. Jack Frost (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Jack Frost (talk) 14:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  142. P,TO 19104 (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021   P,TO 19104 (talk) 17:21, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  143. Duży Bartek (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Duży Bartek (talk) 17:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  144. J ansari (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   -J. Ansari Talk 18:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  145. NK1406 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   NK1406 (talk) 04:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  146. Suvray (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021   Suvray (talk) 09:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  147. Superyetkin (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Operator873's interest in helping smaller wikis find their way is encouraging and would definitely enhance the WMF movement. --Superyetkin (talk) 13:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  148. JLavigne508 (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021   <His considerable amount of time spent serving in those projects overcomes a bit less time in cross wiki experience in my opinion>. JLavigne508 (talk) 13:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  149. Seewolf (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Harald Krichel (talk) 15:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  150. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Have here and there edited at Simple and have always found Operator to be helpful as well as knowledge throughout, He's a fantastic Admin and without a doubt would make a fantastic Steward. –Davey2010Talk 17:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  151. User3749 (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021   User3749 (talk) 08:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  152. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021   somewhat new but has been quite helpful and I've seen nothing but good work (it may just be me returning to Wikimedia recently though) —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 14:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  153. Coffins (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   Coffins (talk) 21:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  154. WikiAviator (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021   WikiAviator (talk) 02:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  155. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   Jasper Deng (talk) 06:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
       VKG1985 (Not eligible, checked by ZabeMath)   VKG1985 (talk) 12:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  156. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021   Per --Uncitoyen, on y va! ——SerialNumber54129 17:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  157. Mrschimpf (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021   Mrschimpf (talk) 04:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  158. Bradv (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021   – bradv🍁 20:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)