Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2021/Votes/Wiki13

< Stewards‎ | Elections 2021
Warning

The 2021 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Wiki13 edit

ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: nl, en-4, af-1, de-1, fr-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello, I'm Wiki13 from the Dutch Wikipedia. I'm also reasonably active on Wikidata and from time to time also contribute to other projects like Wikimedia Commons or MediaWiki.org. In these projects I tend to do many different things, most often this is performing maintenance, investigating sockpuppets or processing requests as administrator. I've been contributing to the Wikimedia projects since 2009. Since 2012 this has been in more global manner, at which point when I joined SWMT. In the years since then I have been global rollbacker and global sysop (with some inbetween periods).

    As part of SWMT I do a lot of global work. Which involves reverting vandalism (using SWViewer), removing spam, blocking LTA's where I can to prevent more damage. Due to the nature of this kind of work I work a lot with the stewards already. This means requesting an action either on the Steward request pages or via IRC (such as oversight requests). As I have been part of the movement for quite some time I'm quite aware of the policies that apply to stewards in their daily work, such as the Access to nonpublic personal data policy, the Oversight policy, the Stewards policy and the CheckUser policy.

    As steward my intent is to start working in the areas I have experience in (vandalism, spamming, LTAs) and expand slowly into other areas where help might be needed.

    For the sake of transparency, I also ran for steward in 2018, albeit unsuccesfully.

    If there any questions I'm happy to answer them. Kind regards, Wiki13 (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2021/Questions#Wiki13


  Yes edit

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021 •  Good global experience. As far as the previous issues I think they are far enough in the past that they are no longer concerning - and the candidate has since regained adminship on nl.wikipedia. Rschen7754 14:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Naleksuh (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  A bit fresher meat than I would have hoped for but seems largely non-problematic. Naleksuh (talk) 14:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  Stryn (talk) 14:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  5. ImprovedWikiImprovment (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  Wiki13 will make a very good steward. --IWI (talk) 14:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Does good work for many years now, I think he's gonna be a good steward! Richardkiwi (talk) 14:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  7. -akko (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  (｀・ω・´) (talk) 14:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  8. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  2014 is a lifetime ago. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Should have become a steward years ago. Trusted and could use the tools. Trijnsteltalk 16:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  10. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021 •  CptViraj (talk) 16:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Fitindia (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  - FitIndia Talk Admin on Commons 16:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  12. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Xwiki activity, can be trusted with the tools, would be a positive addition. LGTM DannyS712 (talk) 16:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  Trusted and can use the tools well. Not super active, but neither are most stewards. – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  14. MrJaroslavik (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  MrJaroslavik (talk) 16:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  15. SQL (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  SQLQuery me! 16:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Kizule (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Kizule (talk) 16:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Pppery (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  * Pppery * it has begun 17:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  I guess we really need as many hands as possible. I will say yes cautiously. I did see some valid concerns in the opposing column but I think 2014 is quite sometime ago. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  19. BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  BrunoBoehmler (talk) 18:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Kippenvlees1 (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021 •  Kippenvlees1 (talk) 20:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Nguyentrongphu (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  2014 is too long ago to criticize. We need more good stewards who will follow the policy strictly. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 20:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  22. DrTrumpet (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Thanks for your work, and further work DrTrumpet (talk) 23:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  23. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  dwf² ✉ 01:54, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  24. JavaHurricane (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 • 2014 is ages back, and while Wiki13 has become a GS recently, if I remember correctly they also were a GS earlier and had resigned the position due to inactivity. No concerns here. JavaHurricane 01:59, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  25. LClightcat (Eligible, checked by -akko)2021 •  メッキの光の勇者-猫🇨🇳Drink tea in tea room🐱 03:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  26. 痛心疾首 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  痛心疾首 (talk) 03:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Elliot321 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Seems to be a constructive user and admin. I see low risk in giving them the tools here. Elliot321 (talk) 04:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Mahir256 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Mahir256 (talk) 04:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  29. 游魂 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Yo Yan 06:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Uncitoyen (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  He/she has been active as GS in certain periods. see He/she helped with SRG in 2020. Most of his/her answers were enough approximately for me. His/her experience gained over the years will help both himself/herself and other stewards. --Uncitoyentalk 06:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  32. AfroThundr3007730 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  — AfroThundr (u · t · c) 07:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Mirinano (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  mirinano (talk) 08:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Jack Frost (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Jack Frost (talk) 08:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2021 •  cyrfaw (talk) 08:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  per Rschen7754 and Camouflaged Mirage. Meiræ 09:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  –Ejs-80 10:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Lemure Saltante (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Lemure Saltante (talk) 14:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  40. นคเรศ (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Nakaret (talk) 15:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Miraclepine (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  Enough time has passed, I don't think they'll abuse the tools. ミラP@Miraclepine 16:59, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Michel Bakni (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Michel Bakni (talk) 17:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  43. باسم (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  باسم (talk) 17:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Hasley (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Sgd. —Hasley 17:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Imetsia (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Imetsia (talk) 18:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  46. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  I believe the previous issues are far enough in the past. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 18:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 23:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Wiwik P (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021 •  Wiwik P (talk) 01:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021 •  FASTILY 02:08, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Blue Sonic (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021 •  Blue Sonic (talk) 02:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021 •  Esteban16 (talk) 02:42, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Maynich (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Maynich (talk) 05:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Mirer (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Mirer (talk) 06:08, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  54. MJL (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  If Rschen7754 is good with Wiki13's response to the 2014 thing, then that's enough to satisfy me. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 06:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Kocgs (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Kocgs (talk) 08:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  56. MarioJump83 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  I have some concerns with GS experience, but cross-wiki experience is enough for me. MarioJump83! 09:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Gripweed (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Gripweed (talk) 10:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Firestar464 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Firestar464 (talk) 11:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Daniuu (talk) 16:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  60. John M Wolfson (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  John M Wolfson (talk) 17:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Jan Myšák (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Experienced user Jan Myšák (talk) 18:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  62. NANöR (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021 •  NANöR (talk) 20:09, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Robins7 (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021 •  Robins7 (talk) 21:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Jusjih (talk) 23:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Impartial just (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  ℑ𝔪𝔭𝔞𝔯𝔱𝔦𝔞𝔩 𝔧𝔲𝔰𝔱🎙️ 02:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Sun8908 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  Sun8908 (talk) 05:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Roller26 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  Roller26 (talk) 06:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Stigfinnare (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Stigfinnare (talk) 09:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Whiteguru (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Good global experience Whiteguru (talk) 10:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  – Ammarpad (talk) 11:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Kudpung (Eligible, checked by Perryprog)2021 •  Kudpung (talk) 13:09, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  72. PoetVeches (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  PoetVeches (talk) 13:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Veracious (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Veracious (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  74. 94rain (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  94rain Talk 14:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  75. 20041027 tatsu (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  20041027 tatsu (talk) 15:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  Hiàn (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •   Klaas `Z4␟` V:  21:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Iluvatar (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Iluvatar (talk) 23:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Veel succes met je stewardschap! Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (CA) 08:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  80. -revi (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  User:-revi/SEV — regards, Revi 08:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Cbyd (talk) 10:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
       Toad62 (Not eligible, checked by Uncitoyen) •  Toad62 (talk) 16:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Chz (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  Chz (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  83. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  ArdiPras95 (talk) 22:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Alexdoherty4 (Eligible, checked by 94rain)2021 •  Alexdoherty4 (talk) 03:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 14:42, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Juan90264 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  Juan90264 (talk) 17:30, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  87. علاء (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  --Alaa :)..! 17:46, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Filipović Zoran (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Filipović Zoran (talk) 20:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Nehaoua (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  Nehaoua (talk) 22:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  90. LuchoCR (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  LuchoCR (talk) 03:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Cairo2k18 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Cairo2k18 • (talk) • (contribs) 06:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Gobonobo (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  gobonobo + c 07:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Carsrac (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Carsrac (talk) 08:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Taivo (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  I think you need my vote. You have excellent crosswiki activity. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Sotiale (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021 •  Sotiale (talk) 11:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  96. .snoopy. (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  .snoopy. ✉ 13:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Csisc (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  Csisc (talk) 17:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Bff (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Bff (talk) 19:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Mark7747 (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  Mark7747 (talk) 15:12, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Jü (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  --Jü (talk) 16:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Fanchb29 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Fanchb29 (talk) 17:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Maestro Ivanković (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Maestro Ivanković 17:45, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 20:17, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  104. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  MZaplotnik(talk) 00:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Elizium23 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Elizium23 (talk) 01:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Sj (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  Trustworthy. Thank you. –SJ talk  03:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Wiki Jonathan2 (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  --Wiki Jonathan2 (talk) 05:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Soundwaweserb (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Юрко Градовський (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Юрко Градовський (talk) 13:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Bencemac (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Bencemac (talk) 14:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Jmbranum (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Jmbranum (talk) 18:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Zabia (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Zabia (talk) 09:02, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Bernd Bergmann (talk) 11:50, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Mfb (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  mfb (talk) 20:47, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  115. فيصل (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021 •  Faisal talk 05:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Saroj Uprety (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Saroj Uprety (talk) 06:15, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Geagea (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Geagea (talk) 08:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Teles (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 15:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Christian.Winterstein (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021 •  Christian (talk) 19:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Labdajiwa (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  Labdajiwa (talk) 02:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  121. JamesLucas (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  JamesLucas (talk) 11:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Eraevsky (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  Eraevsky (обс.) 13:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  123. AVSmalnad77 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  --AVSmalnad77 talk 02:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Tulsi Bhagat (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  LGTM — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 10:32, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Tolly4bolly (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  T4B (talk) 11:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  126. DutchDevil (Eligible, checked by Xaosflux)2021 •  (talk) 16:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  Gereon K. (talk) 23:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Érico (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Érico (talk) 01:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Wil540 art (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  🍀 Wil540 art (talk) 01:11, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Jules* (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021 •  — Jules Talk 11:11, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021 •  Rzuwig► 11:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 • --Roland Kutzki (talk) 14:52, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021 •  Darkhan 17:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  134. TheDragonhunter (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  TheDragonhunter (talk) 22:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  135. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021 •  *Youngjin (talk) 04:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Octahedron80 (talk) 09:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Ross.Patrick (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Ross.Patrick (talk) 15:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Tks4Fish (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  —Thanks for the fish! talk•contribs 17:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Silverije (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  --Silverije 20:58, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  140. NK1406 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  It has been three years since 2018, and even more time since incidents that were brought up then. I'm not sure there is much more that Wiki13 could say to change the minds of people who are hung up on that. Overall, Wiki13 seems to definitely have the qualifications for the job. NK1406 (talk) 04:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Suvray (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Suvray (talk) 09:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Clump (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021 •  Clump (talk) 13:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  143. JLavigne508 (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021 •  DOWN WITH SPAM!!!! JLavigne508 (talk) 14:04, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Seewolf (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  Harald Krichel (talk) 16:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  145. User3749 (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 • 
  146. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021 •  Ameisenigel (talk) 09:52, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021 •  —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 14:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Vikrantkorde (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Vikrantkorde (talk) 17:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021 •  Praxidicae (talk) 17:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Meno25 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Meno25 (talk) 20:58, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Coffins (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021 •  Coffins (talk) 21:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Johannnes89 (talk) 01:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  153. WikiAviator (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021 •  WikiAviator (talk) 02:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
       VKG1985 (Not eligible, checked by ZabeMath) •  VKG1985 (talk) 12:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  154. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  OlEnglish (Talk) 13:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  The 2014 incident is unfortunate, but enough time has passed for it not to be the deal-breaker it once would have been. ——SerialNumber54129 17:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Mrschimpf (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Mrschimpf (talk) 04:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Adithyak1997 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Adithyak1997 (talk) 07:51, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:16, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Bradv (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  – bradv🍁 20:11, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  160. ZI Jony (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 06:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Ahmad252 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Ahmadtalk14:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Masti (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  masti <talk> 18:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Kallichore (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 • --Kallichore (talk) 21:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Charitwo (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Charitwo (talk) 23:11, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  --Marshallsumter (talk) 02:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Nadzik (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  Nadzik (talk) 08:00, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Base (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Base (talk) 12:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  168. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021 •  RadiX∞ 12:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  No edit

  2. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021 •  Not convinced; answers to the questions are a bit strange ("don't know what happened in the 2014 incident"). MF-W 14:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Zblace (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  SAME as above. Not convinced; answers to the questions are a bit strange. Zblace (talk) 14:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021 •  per MF-W, also re-gained GS just recently and not a functionary. Maybe next time. Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  5. AGK (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  As Rschen previously highlighted, the candidate took a controversial position in support of a user who had harassed another user. I'm not comfortable with the candidate being a steward yet. AGK ■ 14:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Indeed, but that was in 2014. --Rschen7754 14:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    That's an 'old cow'. My opinion is that those users should not been blocked indef.. I know what the situation was, it's long ago and it was on my (former) main wiki. I have to laugh if I read about a "controversial position". What a strange reason to vote 'no'. A seven year old 'meaning', make me laugh. This should be forbidden to vote 'no' for an old cow that also was just a meaning. It says nothing about the candidate. - Richardkiwi (talk) 00:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Recent GS so needs more time in that area. Tried to review "reasonably active" wikidata work - but appears to be running huge bot jobs from their editor account, completely polluting their contributions. — xaosflux Talk 15:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  7. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Per MF-W. KPFC 💬 15:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Per MF-W Legoktm (talk) 21:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  9. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  ToBeFree (talk) 22:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Krinkle (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Krinkle (talk) 03:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  Unconvinced per a number of the above Herby talk thyme 07:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Nurtenge (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Nurtenge (talk) 07:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Lt2818 (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2021 •  Lt2818 (talk) 08:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  14. OhKayeSierra (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021 •  OhKayeSierra (talk) 19:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Des Vallee (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021 •  This user doesn't have enough experience imo, and other users statements on their policies on harassment. Des Vallee (talk) 21:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Des Vallee: Just so you are aware, this vote is in the "no" section, which I say because you said you were neutral. You may have meant to vote no anyway, but just making sure you are aware. --IWI (talk) 02:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    ImprovedWikiImprovment Sorry I goofed up, I accidentally forgot to remove this as I though about it for a while. Excuse me, thanks! Des Vallee (talk) 02:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Ah okay. --IWI (talk) 10:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2021 •  Carlotm (talk) 03:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  I do not see a fundamental difference to the situation during the 2018 candidacy. More consistent activity would make it easier to judge whether a promotion to the steward role would be a good idea. --Vogone (talk) 23:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  18. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  SPQRobin (talk) 12:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
       Storkk (Not eligible, checked by Jianhui67) •  (mostly per Natuur12's neutral, but also per Xaosflux) Storkk (talk) 10:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 03:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021 •  Dash77 (talk) 01:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral edit

  2. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021 •  𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 15:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Minorax (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Minorax (talk) 15:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Miniapolis 16:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Joseywales1961 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Joseywales1961 (talk) 13:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Patrik L. (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021 •  Patrik L. (talk) 22:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Geonuch (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021 •  Geonuch (talk) 01:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  8. NickK (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  The experience is good, but the attitude regarding the very sad 2014 Dutch Wikipedia incident is a significant concern — NickK (talk) 13:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  9. SK2242 (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2021 •  SK2242 (talk) 18:19, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Packa (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021 •  Packa (talk) 21:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Florian COLLIN (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Florian COLLIN (talk) 22:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 17:46, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  13. KPX8 (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021 •  KPX8 (talk) 23:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Draceane (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  — Draceane talkcontrib. 11:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Gampe (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Gampe (talk) 10:45, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  This candidate leaves me puzzled. I have no doubt that Wiki13 has the skills to deal with simple CU work and locking LTA's. However, I also associate him with binary thinking and misreading what people write combined with a lack of finesse in sensitive issue's. As for the 2014 incident, a lot has been said, and even more has not been said. But I can say this, I don't think it's fair to continue to judge Wiki13 based on a 6 year old incident of which only a fraction of the relevant information is made public. Natuur12 (talk) 14:22, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021 •  Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  18. SMcCandlish (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  What has changed since the 2018 election? I'm not seeing that the doubts raised then have been addressed in the interim. FWIW, drama from 2016 has nothing to do with my position; others are correct that the facts behind that "case" aren't even completely public.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  20:41, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Mercy (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Mercy (talk) 11:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Same as SMC - I'm not really seeing a difference between 2018 and now.... Could still resign as a Steward when things get too much?, Not enough to outright Oppose but can't support either, –Davey2010Talk 18:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Forgot to add but the 2014 incident is of no concern to me because whatever happened it happened 7 years ago... –Davey2010Talk 18:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Robert McClenon (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Robert McClenon (talk) 05:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Robert Važan (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  — Robert Važan (talk) 05:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2021/Votes/Wiki13&oldid=23407707"