Template:Se2015 statements page

English:

The 2015–16 Confirmation will begin on February 8, and will finish on February 28th.

The 2015–16 Steward Confirmations are a good opportunity to check if we are still happy with our current stewards. To make the process as smooth as possible, here is how things are organized.

To comment, please log in with an account that has edits (on any wiki) before February 1st 2015. During the 2015 Elections, please mention if you are comfortable or unhappy with the use of steward tools of any of the people listed below and why.

At the end of the elections, the current and newly elected stewards will consider complaints left on this page, and choose to remove stewardship as necessary taking into account both the comments left by community and their own perspective and understanding of the job. All stewards elected before February 2015 will undergo this process.

See also:

العربية:

تأكيد 2015-16 سيبدأ في 8 فبراير،وسينتهي في 27 فبراير.

انتخابات المضيفين لعام 2015-16 هي فرصة طيبة لنرى إذا ما كنا مازلنا راضين بمضيفينا الحاليين. ولجعل العملية سلسة بقدر المستطاع، سوف يتم تنظيم الأمور كالتالي.

خلال انتخابات 2015, من فضلك اذكر إذا ما كنت راضيا أو غير راض عن استخدام أحد الأشخاص المذكورين بالأسفل لأدوات المضيف ولماذا. على سبيل المثال، يمكنك أن تذكر عدم النشاط. المضيفون غير النشطين، كما هو مذكور في سياسات المضيفين، سيفقدون صلاحيات المضيفين.

في نهاية الانتخابات، المضيفون الحاليون والمعينون حديثا سيأخذون في الاعتبار الشكاوى المقدمة في هذه الصفحة، ويختارون إزالة الصلاحيات حسب الضرورة. آخذين في الاعتبار الآراء التي تركها المجتمع وفهمهم للوظيفة. كل المضيفين المنتخبون قبل فبراير 2015 سيمرون بهذه العملية بعد كل انتخابات.


انظر أيضا:

Azərbaycanca:

2015-16 konfirmasiyası 8 fevraldan 28 fevrala kimi keçirilir.

2015–16 konfirmasiyası stüardların fəaliyyətindən əvvəlkitək razı olmağımıza əmin olmağımız üçün yaxşı fürsətdir. Prosesin daha şəffaf keçməsi üçün onun necə qurulması ilə tanış olun.

Şərh yazmaq üçün lütfən 1 fevral 2015-ci il tarixədək redaktə etdiyiniz istifadəçi adı ilə sistemə daxil olun. 2015-ci il stüard seçkilərinin gedişi dövründə əvvəlki stüardların hansından və nəyə görə narazı olduğunuz haqqında (məsələn, fəaliyyətsizliyi, yaxud xoşagəlməz davranışı) qeydlər edə bilərsiniz. Qaydaya görə Qeyri-aktiv stüardlar statusundan məhrum olur.

Seçkilər sona çatdıqdan sonra əvvəlki və yeni seçilmiş stüardlar bu səhifədə qeyd olunmuş şikayətlərə baxır, istifadəçilərin şərhləri, onların məxsusi nöqteyi-nəzərini və stüardların gördüyü işin mahiyyətini təhlil edərək zəruru hallarda statusu geri ala bilərlər.

Hər bir seçkidən sonra bütün stüardlar bu prosesdən keçirlər.

Həmçinin bax:

বাংলা:

২০১৪-১৫ এর নির্বাচন শুরু হবে ৮ ফেব্রুয়ারী এবং শেষ হবে ২৮ ফেব্রুয়ারি ।

স্ট্যুয়ার্ড নির্বাচন ২০১৪-১৫ বর্তমান স্ট্যুয়ার্ডদের কাজে আমরা এখনো সন্তুষ্ট আছি কিনা তা মূল্যায়ন করার একটি ভাল সুযোগ। এ প্রক্রিয়াকে যথাসম্ভব সহজতর করতে কিভাবে ব্যাপারগুলো সাজানো হয়েছে এখানে তার ওপর আলোকপাত করা হয়েছে ।

মন্তব্য করতে অনুগ্রহ করে এমন কোন একাউন্ট থেকে লগইন করুন যা থেকে ১ ফেব্রুয়ারি ২০১৪ এর আগে (যেকোন উইকিতে) সম্পাদনা করা হয়েছে। স্ট্যুয়ার্ড নির্বাচন ২০১৪, এর প্রক্কালে নিম্নলিখিত কোন কোন ব্যক্তি সম্পর্কে আপনার অভিজ্ঞতা সুখকর নয় এবং কেন তা উল্লেখ করুন । যেমন, আপনি তাদের নিস্ক্রিয়তা, নেতিবাচক ব্যবহার ইত্যাদি। স্ট্যুয়ার্ড নীতিমালা অনুসরণে নিস্ক্রিয় স্ট্যুয়ার্ডদের ক্ষমতা বিলোপ করা হবে। নির্বাচন শেষে বর্তমান এবং নবনিযুক্ত স্ট্যুয়ার্ডগণ অভিযোগসমূহ বিবেচনা করে স্ট্যুয়ার্ড-ক্ষমতা বিলোপকরত নিজস্ব দৃষ্টিভঙ্গি থেকে সমঝোতার লক্ষ্যে ব্যবস্থা গ্রহন করবে। সকল স্ট্যুয়ার্ডকেই প্রতিটি নির্বাচনের পর এ প্রক্রিয়ার মাধ্যমে অগ্রসর হতে হয়। আরও দেখুন:

Deutsch:

Die Bestätigung der Stewards für die Zeit von 2015 bis 2016 wird am 8. Februar 2015 beginnen und am 28. Februar enden.

Der Bestätigungsprozess 2015–2016 ist eine gute Gelegenheit herauszufinden, ob wir nach wie vor mit den derzeitigen Stewards zufrieden sind. Um diesen Prozess so einfach wie möglich zu gestalten, sind die Dinge folgendermaßen organisiert:

Um zu kommentieren, melde dich bitte mit einem Account an, der Edits (in irgendeinem Wiki) vor dem 1. Februar 2015 hat. Während der Stewardwahlen 2015 erwähne bitte, wenn du (als Wähler) mit einer der unten gelisteten Personen unzufrieden sein solltest, insbesondere in Bezug auf Stewardaktionen. Du kannst zum Beispiel anmerken, dass die Person ein inaktiver Steward ist. Oder du kannst das Verhalten des Betreffenden beanstanden. Inaktiven Stewards, wie in diesem Grundsatz definiert, wird ihr Status entzogen.

Am Ende der Wahlen werden die jetzigen und die durch die Wahlen neu gewählten Stewards auf dieser Seite hinterlassene Beschwerden bei der Bestätigung der Stewards berücksichtigen. Mit Hilfe der Kommentare der Gemeinschaft und ihrer eigenen Perspektive und Kenntnisse über diese Aufgabe werden sie gemeinsam entscheiden, den Stewardstatus – falls notwendig – zu entfernen.

Alle Stewards, die vor Februar 2015 gewählt wurden, müssen diesen Prozess durchlaufen (wie jedes Jahr).

Siehe auch:

Deutsch (Sie-Form):

Die Bestätigung der Stewards für die Zeit von 2015 bis 2016 wird am 8. Februar 2015 beginnen und am 28. Februar enden.

Der Bestätigungsprozess 2015–2016 ist eine gute Gelegenheit herauszufinden, ob wir nach wie vor mit den derzeitigen Stewards zufrieden sind. Um diesen Prozess so einfach wie möglich zu gestalten, sind die Dinge folgendermaßen organisiert:

Um zu kommentieren, melden Sie sich bitte mit einem Account an, der Edits (in irgendeinem Wiki) vor dem 1. Februar 2015 hat. Während der Stewardwahlen 2015 erwähnen Sie bitte, wenn Sie (als Wähler) mit einer der unten gelisteten Personen unzufrieden sein sollten, insbesondere in Bezug auf Stewardaktionen. Sie können zum Beispiel anmerken, dass die Person ein inaktiver Steward ist. Oder Sie können das Verhalten des Betreffenden beanstanden. Inaktiven Stewards, wie in diesem Grundsatz definiert, wird ihr Status entzogen.

Am Ende der Wahlen werden die jetzigen und die durch die Wahlen neu gewählten Stewards auf dieser Seite hinterlassene Beschwerden bei der Bestätigung der Stewards berücksichtigen. Mit Hilfe der Kommentare der Gemeinschaft und ihrer eigenen Perspektive und Kenntnisse über diese Aufgabe werden sie gemeinsam entscheiden, den Stewardstatus – falls notwendig – zu entfernen.

Alle Stewards, die vor Februar 2015 gewählt wurden, müssen diesen Prozess durchlaufen (wie jedes Jahr).

Siehe auch:

Ελληνικά:

Η επιβεβαίωση για το 2015–16 θα αρχίσει στις 8 Φεβρουαρίου και θα τελειώσει στις 28 Φεβρουαρίου.

Οι εκλογές επιτρόπων (stewards) για το 2015–16 είναι καλή ευκαιρία για να γίνει έλεγχος αν είμαστε ακόμα ευχαριστημένοι με τους τωρινούς επιτρόπους. Για να είναι η διαδικασία όσο πιο ομαλή γίνεται ακολουθεί ο τρόπος με τον οποίο θα οργανωθεί.

Για να σχολιάσετε παρακαλώ συνδεθείτε με ένα λογαριασμό που να έχει επεξεργασίες σε ένα οποιοδήποτε wiki πριν την 1η Φεβρουαρίου 2015. Κατά την διάρκεια των εκλογών του 2015, αναφέρετε παρακαλώ αν είστε δυσαρεστημένοι με κάποιο από τα άτομα που καταριθμούνται παρακάτω και γιατί. Αναφέρατε για παράδειγμα απραξία ή αρνητική συμπεριφορά. Ανενεργοί επίτροποι, όπως αναφέρεται στην πολιτική, θα χάνουν την ιδιότητά τους.

Στο τέλος των εκλογών , οι τρέχοντες και οι νεοεκλεγέντες επίτροποι θα λάβουν υπόψη τους τα παράπονα που θα έχουν αφεθεί στην σελίδα και θα επιλέξουν να αφαιρέσουν την ιδιότητα επιτρόπου, όπως είναι αναγκαίο, λαμβάνοντας υπόψη και τα σχόλια της κοινότητας και την δικιά τους οπτική και αντίληψη της δουλειάς. Όλοι οι επίτροποι θα περνάνε από αυτή την διαδικασία μετά από κάθε εκλογή.

Δείτε επίσης:

Emiliàn e rumagnòl:

Attention: This translation requires an update! Please refer to the English version for the correct information, and adjust the translation, if you can.

La vutasiòṅ 2015–16 p'r al cunférmi la tacarà 'l 8 ad Favràr e la finirà al 27 ad Favràr.

Gl'elesiòṅ 2015–16 p'r i nóṿ steward i èṅ n'ucaśiòṅ bòna par véd'r al livèl ad sudisfasiòṅ ch'a gh'è in di cunfrònt di steward 'd adès. Par réndar più fàcila la prucedùra, che 'd sóta a s cònta cuma a s farà.

Par far di cumènt, culég-at cun 'n account ch'l àppia fat dal mudìfichi (in na wiki basta ch'a sia) prima dal 1 ad Favràr dal 2015. Durànt gl'elesiòṅ dal 2015, mét p'r iscrìt i mutìṿ, s'a gh 'n è, ad cuntintésa o no rispèt a 'l funsiòṅ ad steward da part d'l utènt ch'a s dascór. Par dir-'n una, at prév tiràr in bal al perìud lung in dua al n à fat gnint. I steward ch'i n s dàṅ minga da far, cuma stablî in dla policy ad riferimènt, i perdaràṅ al sò status.

Dà n'uciàda anc a:

Español :

Las confirmaciones de 2015–16 empiezan el 8 de febrero y finalizarán el 28 de febrero.

Las confirmaciones de steward son una buena oportunidad para ver si aún estamos contentos con nuestros stewards actuales. Para facilitar el proceso, así es como se organizarán las cosas:

Para comentar, inicia sesión con una cuenta creada con anterioridad al 1 de febrero de 2015 y que tenga ediciones en algún proyecto. Durante las elecciones del 2015, menciona si estás descontento con alguna de las personas listadas debajo y por qué. Por ejemplo, puedes mencionar inactividad o comportamiento no conforme a las políticas que regulan la actuación de este grupo. Los stewards inactivos, de acuerdo a la correspondiente política perderán sus permisos. Sólo serán tenidos en cuenta los comentarios que tengan que ver con el uso y desenvolvimiento de sus tareas como stewards. Las confirmaciones no son una votación.

Al final de la elección, los stewards actuales, junto con los nuevos, considerarán los argumentos vertidos en esta página y tomarán una decisión, tomando en cuenta tanto los comentarios de la comunidad, como la propia perspectiva y entendimiento del trabajo propia. Todos los stewards pasarán por este proceso después de cada elección.

Ver también:

Eesti:

Stjuuardite valimine 2015/16. aastaks algab 8. veebruaril ja lõpeb 28. veebruaril.

Stjuuardite valimine 2015/16. aastaks on hea võimalus kontrollida, kas me oleme praeguste stjuuarditega rahul. Selleks, et see protsess oleks võimalikult sujuv, on see korraldatud järgmiselt.

Kommenteerimiseks tuleb sisse logida kasutajana, kes on (ükskõik millises vikis) teinud enne 1. veebruari 2015 vähemalt ühe muudatuse. Lehel 2015. aasta valimised tuleb märkida, kes allpool loetletud inimestest on stjuuardite vahendeid kasutanud hästi ja kes halvasti ning miks. Näiteks võib mainida passiivsust. Vastavalt stjuuardite reeglitele kaotavad passiivsed stjuuardid oma õigused.

Valimiste järel arutavad praegused ja äsjavalitud stjuuardid sellele lehele jäetud kaebusi ning võivad vajadusel stjuuardi õigused ära võtta, arvestades niihästi kogukonna kommentaare kui nende endi visiooni ja arusaamist sellest tööst. Kõik enne 2015. aasta veebruari valitud stjuuardid läbivad selle protsessi.

Vaata ka:

Suomi:

Ylivalvojien hyväksyminen vuosille 2015–16 alkaa 8. helmikuuta ja päättyy 27. helmikuuta.

Ylivalvojien hyväksyminen vuosille 2015–16 on hyvä mahdollisuus tarkistaa olemmeko yhä tyytyväisiä nykyisiin ylivalvojiimme. Jotta prosessi olisi mahdollisimman sujuvaa, tässä on kuinka asiat järjestetään.

Kommentoidaksesi, kirjaudu sisään tunnuksella, jolla on tehty muokkauksia (missä tahansa wikissä) ennen 1. helmikuuta 2015. 2015-vaalien aikana, mainitse oletko tyytyväinen vai et siihen, miten ylivalvojat ovat käyttäneet työkalujaan, ja miksi.

Vaalien lopussa nykyiset ja uudet ylivalvojat keskustelevat tälle sivulle jätetyistä valituksista, ja tarvittaessa voivat ottaa pois ylivalvojan oikeudet käyttäjältä, ottaen huomioon sekä yhteisön kommentit, oman näkemyksensä sekä roolin ymmärtämisen. Tämä prosessi koskee kaikkia ennen helmikuuta 2015 valittuja ylivalvojia.

Katso myös:

Français :
La confirmation des stewards pour 2015–2016 débutera le 8 février et se terminera le 27 février.

La confirmation des stewards pour 2015–2016 est une bonne occasion de vérifier que nous sommes toujours satisfaits de nos stewards actuels. Pour que le processus soit le plus fluide possible, voici comment les choses sont organisées.

Pour commenter, veuillez vous connecter avec un compte qui a des éditions (sur n'importe quel wiki) avant le 1er février 2015. Pendant les élections 2015, veuillez dire si vous n'êtes pas satisfait quant à l'utilisation des outils de steward de l'une des personnes listées ci-dessous en précisant pourquoi. Par exemple, vous pouvez mentionner l'inactivité. Les stewards inactifs, comme mentionné dans les règles des stewards, perdront leurs droits de steward.

À la fin des élections, les stewards actuels et nouvellement élus prendront en considération les commentaires laissés sur cette page et choisiront si nécessaire de retirer les droits de steward en prenant en compte à la fois les commentaires laissés par la communauté et leur propre vision et compréhension du rôle de steward. Tous les stewards élus avant février 2015 suivront cette procédure.

Voir également :

Alemannisch :

Attention: This translation requires an update! Please refer to the English version for the correct information, and adjust the translation, if you can.

D Bstetigung 2015 geht vom 8. - 26. Februar 2015.

D Wahle 2015/16 sin e gueti Glägeheit uusezfinde, eb mir allno mit dr deryztige Steward zfride sin. Go dää Prozäss eso eifach wie megli z mache, herauszufinden, ob wir nach wie vor mit den derzeitigen Stewards zufrieden sind. Um diesen Prozess so einfach wie möglich zu gestalten, isch des eso organisiert:

Wänn Du (as Wehler) bi dr Stewards/Elections 2015 mit eire vu dr Persone, wu do unte ufzellt sin, uuzfride bisch, no gibt des bitte aa. Du chasch zem Byschpel aamerke, ass die Person e inaktive Steward isch. Oder Du chasch s Verhalte vu dämjenige kritisiere.

Inaktive Steward, wie in däm Grundsatz definiert, wäre ihri Rächt ewäggnuu.

Am Änd vu dr Wahle wäre di jetzige Steward (di alte un di neje) d Bschwärde, wu uf däre Syte ufzellt sin, berucksichtige un mit Hilf vu dr Kommentar vu dr Gmeinschaft un ihre eigene Perspektive un Chänntnis iber die Ufgab entscheide, eb eberem dr Stewardstatus ewägnuu wird.

Alli Steward mien no jedere Wahl dää Prozäss durmache.

Lueg au:

עברית:

אישור 2015-16 החל ב־8 בפברואר, ויסתיים ב־28 בפברואר.

הבחירות לדיילים 2015-16 הן הזדמנות טובה לבדוק אם אנחנו עדיין מרוצים מהדיילים הנוכחיים שלנו. כדי שהתהליך יהיה חלק ככל האפשר, הנה איך הדברים מאורגנים.

כדי לכתוב הערה, אנא התחברו עם חשבון בעל עריכות (בוויקי כלשהו) קודם 1 בפברואר 2015. במהלך בחירות 2015, נא ציינו אם אינכם מרוצים מאחד מהדיילים המפורטים להלן ומדוע. לדוגמה, אתם יכולים לציין חוסר פעילות או התנהגות שלילית. דיילים לא פעילים, כאמור במדיניות הדיילות, יאבדו את הרשאת הדייל שלהם.

בתום הבחירות, הדיילים הנוכחיים והנבחרים החדשים ישקלו תלונות שנכתבו בדף זה, ויבחרו להסיר את הרשאת הדייל במקרה הצורך, תוך לקיחה בחשבון הן של התגובות שהתקבלו מהקהילה והן של נקודת מבטם האישית והבנתם את התפקיד. כל הדיילים יעברו את התהליך הזה לאחר כל בחירות.

ראו גם:

Bahasa Indonesia:

Attention: This translation requires an update! Please refer to the English version for the correct information, and adjust the translation, if you can.

Konfirmasi 2015 telah dimulai pada tanggal 8 Februari (– 27 Februari).

Pemilihan Steward 2015 adalah kesempatan yang baik untuk meyakinkan apakah komunitas masih mendukung para Steward yang bertugas saat ini. Untuk memastikan kelancaran prosesnya, berikut adalah bagaimana berbagai hal diatur.

Selama pemilihan 2015, harap sebutkan jika Anda merasa salah satu pengguna yang terdaftar di bawah ini sudah tidak tepat lagi sebagai Steward dan alasannya. Sebagai contoh, Anda dapat menyebutkan alasan ketidakaktifan atau perilaku yang negatif. Para steward non-aktif, sebagaimana kebijakan mengenai steward, akan kehilangan akses teknis stewardnya.

Pada akhir pemilihan, para Steward saat ini dan yang terpilih harus mempertimbangkan keluhan-keluhan yang dituliskan di halaman ini, dan dapat memilih untuk menanggalkan status stewardnya atas komentar-komentar dari komunitas serta perspektif dan pengertian mereka sendiri akan tugas mereka sebagai steward. Seluruh steward akan melalui proses ini setelah suatu pemilihan berkahir.

Lihat juga:

Italiano:

La votazione di riconferma 2015–16 avrà inizio il 8 febbraio e terminerà il 27 febbraio.

Le elezioni 2015–16 per i nuovi steward rappresentano una buona opportunità per verificare il livello di soddisfazione esistente nei confronti degli attuali steward. Al fine di rendere agevole la procedura, sono riportate qui le modalità di svolgimento.

Per commentare, effettua l'accesso con un account che abbia effettuato modifiche (su qualsiasi wiki) precedentemente al 1º febbraio 2015. Durante le elezioni del 2015, indica gli eventuali motivi di soddisfazione o scontento rispetto l'uso delle funzioni di steward da parte dell'utente indicato. Per esempio, potresti riferirti all'inattività. Gli steward inattivi, come stabilito nelle policy di riferimento, perderanno il proprio status.

Al termine delle elezioni, gli steward attuali e i nuovi eletti esamineranno le segnalazioni contenute su questa pagina e sceglieranno se rimuovere i diritti di steward, sia tenendo conto dei commenti lasciati dalla comunità, sia delle prospettive e dell'interpretazione del proprio compito da parte di ciascuno. Tutti gli steward eletti prima del febbraio 2015 ripeteranno questo iter di riconferma al termine di ciascuna elezione.

Vedi anche:

日本語:

2015-16年度のスチュワード信任投票は2月8日に開始され、2月27日に終了します。

2015-16年度のスチュワード信任投票は、現在のスチュワードたちに私たちが今も満足しているかどうかを確認するよい機会です。この信任作業を出来る限り円滑に進めるため、以下の点にご留意ください。

意見を述べるには、(姉妹ウィキを含めいずれかのウィキで)2015年2月1日より前の編集実績がある利用者名でログインしてください。2015年スチュワード選挙の間に、下にリストされたスチュワードの権限行使の実態についてあなたが満足しているかどうかを理由とともに述べてください。

信任投票の終わりに、現在のスチュワードと新しく信任されたスチュワードはこのページに記された苦情を考慮し、コミュニティからのコメントとスチュワードとしての見解また仕事についての理解の双方に基づき、必要と判断された場合にスチュワード権限を取り除きます。2015年2月以前に選出されたスチュワードは全員が信任投票を受けます。

関連項目:


한국어:

2015-16년도 사무장 신임 투표가 2월 8일에 시작해 2월 27일에 종료할 것입니다.

2015-16년도 사무장 신임 투표는 우리가 현 사무장에 여전히 만족하는지 알 수 있는 좋은 기회입니다. 되도록 순조롭게 진행되도록, 이 절차가 어떻게 이루어지는지 여기에 설명합니다.

의견을 개진하려면, 2015년 2월 1일 이전에 편집한 실적이 있는 계정(어떤 위키라도 무관)으로 로그인하십시오. 2015년 선거 기간에, 아래에 열거된 사무장이 자신의 권한 도구를 사용하는 데에 만족하는지 아닌지 이유를 들어 말씀해 주세요. 가령, 활동하지 않는 것을 언급할 수도 있습니다. 활동하지 않는 사무장은 사무장 정책에 따라 사무장 권한이 해제될 것입니다.

선거가 끝난 시점에, 현 사무장과 사무장 당선자는 이 문서에 있는 의견을 검토할 것이며, 커뮤니티의 의견과 자신들의 관점, 업무 이해도를 고려하여 필요하다면 사무장의 권한을 해제할 것입니다. 2015년 2월 이전에 선출된 모든 사무장이 이 절차를 거칠 것입니다.

함께 보기:

Lëtzebuergesch:

D'Confirmatioun vun de Stewards fir 2015 bis 2016 fänkt den 8. Februar 2015 un an dauert bis den 28. Februar.

De Confirmatiounsprozess 2015–2016 ass eng gutt Geleeënheet fir erauszefannen, ob mir nach ëmmer mat den aktuelle Stewards zefridde sinn. Fir dëse Prozess esou einfach wéi méiglech ze maachen, ass et esou organiséiert ginn:

Fir Bemierkungen ze maache mellt Iech w.e.g. mat engem Benotzerkont un, deen Ännerungen (op iergendenger Wiki) virum 1. Februar 2015 gemaach huet. Während de Stewardwalen 2015 ernimmt w.e.g., wann Dir (als Wieler) mat engem vun de Persounen, déi hei drënner stinn net zefridde si sollt, besonnesch a Relatioun mat Stewardaktiounen. Dir kënnt zum Beispill bemierken, datt déi Persoun als Steward inaktiv ass. Oder Dir kënnt mam Verhale vun deemjéinegen net zefridde sinn. Inaktiv Stewards, wéi an dëser Richtlinn definéiert, kréien hire Status ofgeholl.

Um Ënn vun de Wale ginn déi aktuell an déi neigewielte Stewards, den op dëser Säit gemaachte Reklamatiounen no. Mat Hëllef vun de Bemierkunge vun der Gemeinschaft an hiren eegenen Iwwerleeungen iwwer d'Fonctioun vun de Stewards gëtt dann decidéiert ob de Stewardstatus ofgeholl gëtt.

All Stewards, déi viru Februar 2015 gewielt goufen, mussen dëse Prozess passéieren (wéi all Joer).

Kuckt och:

Nederlands:

De herbevestiging van 2015–2016 zal beginnen op 8 februari en eindigen op 27 februari.

De stewardverkiezingen van 2015–2016 zijn een goed moment om na te gaan of we nog steeds tevreden zijn over de huidige stewards. Om dat proces zo soepel mogelijk te laten verlopen vind je hieronder hoe deze herbevesting is georganiseerd.

Tijdens de verkiezingen van 2015 kun je aangeven of je ontevreden bent over een van de hieronder genoemde stewards. Geef daarbij ook aan waarom dat zo is. Je kunt bijvoorbeeld inactiviteit of slecht gedrag noemen. Volgens het stewardbeleid zullen inactieve stewards uit hun functie worden ontheven.

Na afloop van de verkiezingen zullen de huidige en de nieuw verkozen stewards de genoemde punten overwegen. Zo nodig zullen ze het stewardschap ontnemen, daarbij rekening houdend met zowel de door de gemeenschap gemaakte opmerkingen als hun eigen inzichten en kennis. Alle stewards zullen na elke verkiezing op deze manier herbevestigd worden.

Zie ook:

Norsk:

2015–2016-forvalterbekreftelsene vil begynne 8. februar og vare til 28. februar.

Forvaltervalget for 2015–16 er en fin mulighet til å finne ut om vi er fornøyd med våre nåværende forvaltere. For å gjøre prosessen så strømlinjeformet som mulig, kan dere se her hvordan ting er organisert.

Vennligst logg inn med en brukerkonto med redigeringer (på en hvilken som helst wiki) før 1. februar 2015. Under 2015-valget, vennligst fortell om du er misfornøyd med en av personene listet nedenfor, og i tilfelle hvorfor. For eksempel kan bemerke inaktivitet eller negativ oppførsel. Inaktive forvlatere vil, som fastsatt i forvalterretningslinjene, miste sine rettigheter.

På slutten av valget vil de nåværende og nyvalgte forvalterne vurdere klagene og velge om forvalter-rettigheten skal fjernes, ut ifra både kommentarene som er avgitt og deres egne syn og forståelse av jobben. Alle forvaltere går igjennom denne prosessen etter hvert valg.

Se også:

ଓଡ଼ିଆ:

Attention: This translation requires an update! Please refer to the English version for the correct information, and adjust the translation, if you can.

୨୦୧୪-୧୫ ନିମନ୍ତେ ନିଶ୍ଚିତକରଣ ଫେବ୍ରୁଆରୀ ୮ରେ ଆରମ୍ଭ ହେବ ଓ ଫେବ୍ରୁଆରୀ ୨୮ରେ ସରିବ ।

୨୦୧୪-୧୫ ଷ୍ଟୁଆର୍ଡ଼ ନିଶ୍ଚିତକରଣ ଆମେ ଏବେକାର ଷ୍ଟୁଆର୍ଡ଼ ମାନଙ୍କୁ ନେଇ ସନ୍ତୁଷ୍ଟ କି ନାହିଁ ତାହା ଜାଣିବାର ଏକ ସୁଯୋଗ । ଏହାକୁ ସୁଚାରୁ ରୂପେ ସମ୍ପାଦନ କରିବା ନିମନ୍ତେ ଏଠାରେ କ'ଣ କେମିତି କରାଯିବ ତାହା ବର୍ଣ୍ଣନାକରାଗଲା ।

ମତାମତ ଦେବା ନିମନ୍ତେ, ଦୟାକରି ୧ ଫେବ୍ରୁଆରୀ ୨୦୧୪ ଆଗରୁ କିଛି ସମ୍ପାଦନା କରିଥିବା ଖାତାରୁ (ଯେକୌଣସି ଉଇକିପିଡ଼ିଆରୁ) ଲଗ ଇନ କରନ୍ତୁ । ୨୦୧୪ ମତଦାନ କାଳରେ, ଦୟାକରି ଆପଣ ତଳେ ଥିବା ଲୋକମାନଙ୍କର ଷ୍ଟୁଆର୍ଡ଼ ଉପକରଣ ବ୍ୟବହାରରେ ସନ୍ତୁଷ୍ଟ କି ନାହିଁ ତାହା କାରଣ ସହ ଲେଖନ୍ତୁ ।

ମତଦାନ ଶେଷରେ ଏବେକାର ଓ ନୂଆ ବଛାଯାଇଥିବା ଷ୍ଟୁଆର୍ଡ଼ମାନେ ଏହି ପୃଷ୍ଠାରେ ଥିବା ଅଭିଯୋଗକୁ ବିଚାରିବେ ଓ ଦରକାର ପଡ଼ିଲେ ସଙ୍ଘ ମତାମତ, ନିଜ ବିଚାର ଓ ବୁଝିବା ଶକ୍ତି ତଥା କାମର ଆବଶ୍ୟକତାକୁ ବିଚାରକରି ଷ୍ଟୁଆର୍ଡ଼ କ୍ଷମତା ପ୍ରତ୍ୟାହାର କରିନେବେ । ଫେବ୍ରୁଆରୀ ୨୦୧୪ ଆଗରୁ ବଛାଯାଇଥିବା ସମସ୍ତ ଷ୍ଟୁଆର୍ଡ଼ ଏହି ପ୍ରକ୍ରିୟା ଭିତରେ ଯିବେ ।

ଆହୁରି ଦେଖନ୍ତୁ:

Polski:

Głosowanie nad zatwierdzeniem uprawnień obecnie działających stewardów na kolejną kadencję (2015/16) będzie trwało od 8 do 27 lutego.

Głosowanie potwierdzające jest dobrą okazją by sprawdzić, czy społeczność jest zadowolona z pracy obecnie wypełniających te funkcje osób. Aby procedura przebiegała sprawnie i harmonijnie, zostanie ona przeprowadzona w następujący sposób.

Aby dodać swój komentarz należy zalogować się do konta, z którego przed 1 lutego 2015 wykonywano edycje w którymkolwiek z projektów Fundacji Wikimedia. W trakcie trwania głosowania możesz wyrazić swoje zadowolenie bądź niezadowolenie, wraz z uzasadnieniem, ze sposobu w jaki wykorzystują narzędzia stewarda poszczególne, wymienione poniżej, osoby. Możesz wspomnieć np. o braku aktywności danej osoby. Stewardzi niewykorzystujący uprawnień, jakie w związku z pełnieniem tej funkcji zostały im przyznane, zostaną ich pozbawieni, zgodnie z przyjętymi zasadami.

Po zakończeniu głosowania obecni oraz nowo wybrani stewardzi rozważą skargi zgłoszone na tej stronie i postanowią o ewentualnym odebraniu uprawnień, biorąc pod uwagę zarówno komentarze pozostawione przez członków społeczności jak i swój własny punkt widzenia na sposób w jaki należy wykonywać obowiązki stewarda. Procedurze tej zostaną poddani wszyscy stewardzi wybrani przed lutym 2015.

Zobacz także:

Português :

A confirmação 2015–16 começará em 8 de fevereiro e terminará em 27 de fevereiro.

As eleições de 2015–16 para Stewards são uma boa oportunidade para verificar se estamos realmente satisfeitos com os nossos atuais Stewards. Para facilitar o processo, as coisas estão organizadas dessa forma:

Para comentar, por favor entre com uma conta que tenha edições (em qualquer wiki) antes de 1 de fevereiro de 2015. Durante as eleições de 2016, por favor indique se está insatisfeito com algumas das pessoas abaixo listadas e porquê. Por exemplo, você pode mencionar inatividade ou comportamento negativo. Stewards inativos, como indicado nas políticas dos Stewards, perderão seus acessos de Steward.

No final das eleições, os atuais Stewards, junto com os recém-eleitos, analisarão as reclamações colocadas nesta página e optarão por remover o status de Steward, se necessário, tendo em conta tanto os comentários deixados pela comunidade como a sua própria perspectiva e entendimento do trabalho. Todos os Stewards passarão por este processo depois de cada eleição.

Veja também:

Română :

Confirmarea stewarzilor pentru 2015–16 va începe pe 8 februarie şi se va termina pe 27 februarie.

Confirmările stewarzilor pentru 2015-16 sunt un bun prilej de a verifica dacă suntem încă mulţumiţi cu stewarzi actuali. Pentru a face procesul cât mai uşor posibil, aici este modul în care lucrurile sunt organizate.

Pentru a comenta, vă rugăm să vă autentificaţi cu un cont care are modificări (pe orice wiki) înainte de 1 februarie 2015. În timpul alegerilor din 2015, vă rugăm să spuneţi dacă sunteţi nemulţumit(ă) de oricare dintre persoanele enumerate mai jos, precizând motivele. De exemplu, aveţi posibilitatea să menţionaţi inactivitatea sau comportamentul negativ. Stewarzi inactivi, după cum se menţionează în politicile steward îşi vor pierde accesul de steward.

La sfârşitul alegerilor, actualii şi nou aleşii stewarzi vor lua în considerare comentariile de pe această pagină din stânga şi vor alege dacă este necesar să retragă drepturile de steward, luând în considerare atât comentariile lăsate de comunitate, propria viziune şi înţelegerea rolului de steward. Toţi stewarzi aleşi înainte de luna februarie 2015 se vor supune acestui proces.

Vezi şi:

Русский:

Конфирмация 2015–16 начнётся 8 февраля и окончится 28 февраля.

Конфирмация 2015–16 - неплохая возможность убедиться, что мы по-прежнему довольны нашими стюардами. Чтобы процесс прошёл как можно более гладко, ознакомьтесь с тем, как он устроен.

Чтобы прокомментировать, пожалуйста, войдите в систему учётной записью, обладающей правками на любой вики до 1 февраля 2015 года. В течение выборов стюардов 2015 упомяните здесь, если вы недовольны кем-то из нынешних стюардов, почему вы им недовольны. Например, можно упомянуть бездействие или неприятное поведение. Неактивные стюарды, согласно правилам, теряют свой статус.

По окончанию выборов, нынешние и вновь избранные стюарды рассмотрят жалобы, оставленные на этой странице, и снимут статусы в случае необходимости, принимая во внимание комментарии, оставленные сообществом, их собственную точку зрения и понимание сути работы стюарда. Все стюарды будут проходить сквозь этот процесс после каждых выборов.

См. также:

தமிழ்:

2015–16 ஆண்டிற்கான உறுதிபடுத்துதல் பிப்ரவரி 8 அன்று ஆரம்பித்து பிப்ரவரி 27 அன்று முடியும்.

தற்பொழுதுள்ள மேலாளர்களே நீடிக்கலாம் என்பதனை சரிப்பார்க்க 2015-16 மேலாளர் உறுதிபடுத்துதல் ஒரு நல்ல சந்தர்ப்பம்.இந்த செயல்முறையை எளிதாக்க,கீழ்க் கண்டவாறு உறுதிபடுத்துதல் அமைக்கபட்டுள்ளது.

பிப்ரவரி 1,2015 க்கு முன்னர் ஏதேனும் விக்கியில் தொகுத்தலுக்கு உபயோகித்த பயனர்க்கணக்கில் புகுபதிகை செய்து இங்கே கருத்து தெரிவிக்கலாம். 2015 மேலாளர் தேர்தல் சமயத்தில், கீழே குறிப்பிடப்பட்டுள்ள நபர்களின் எவரேனும் ஒருவரின் மேலாளர் கருவிகள் உங்களுக்கு பிடிக்கவில்லை அல்லது பிடித்திருக்கிறது என்பதனை தயவுசெய்து தெரிவியுங்கள்.உதாரணத்திற்கு,செயலின்றி இருக்கும் மேலாளர்கள் பற்றி கூறலாம்.செயலின்றி இருக்கும் மேலாளர்கள் மேலாளர் கொள்கைகளின்படி தங்களது மேலாளர் அணுக்கத்தை இழப்பர்.

தேர்தலின் முடிவில் , தற்பொழுது உள்ள மற்றும் புதிதாக தேர்வு செய்யப்பட மேலாளர்கள் இந்த பக்கத்தில் உள்ள புகார்களை கருதி, விக்கி சமூகத்தின் கருத்துகள் மற்றும் தங்களது பணியின் புரிதலைக் கொண்டு தங்களது மேலாளர் உரிமையை வேண்டுமானால் நீக்கிக்கொள்ளலாம்.பிப்ரவரி 2015 முன்பு தேர்வு செய்யப்பட அனைத்து மேலாளர்களும் இந்த செயல்முறைக்கு உட்படுத்தப்படுவர்.

மேலும் பார்க்க:


ไทย:

การรับรองปี 2015–16 จะเริ่มในวันที่ 8 กุมภาพันธ์

การลงคะแนนเลือก Steward ปี 2015–16 เป็นโอกาสที่ดีในการตรวจสอบว่าเรายังคงพึงพอใจใน Steward คนปัจจุบันของเราหรือไม่ เพื่อทำให้กระบวนการนี้นุ่มนวลที่สุด นี่คือวิธีการจัดการ

ระหว่างการลงคะแนนปี 2015 โปรดแสดงความคิดเห็นหากคุณไม่พึงพอใจบุคคลใด ๆ ในรายชื่อด้านล่างพร้อมเหตุผล ตัวอย่างเช่น คุณอาจบอกกล่าวถึงการไม่มีส่วนร่วมหรือพฤติกรรมด้านลบ Steward ที่ไม่มีส่วนร่วมเป็นระยะเวลาหนึ่ง ดังที่กล่าวไว้ในนโยบายเกี่ยวกับ Steward จะถูกถอดถอนจากการเป็น Steward

เมื่อสิ้นสุดการลงคะแนน ผู้ได้รับการคัดเลือกทั้งคนปัจจุบันและคนใหม่จะพิจารณาข้อความที่แสดงความไม่พึงพอใจในหน้านี้และอาจพิจารณาถอดถอนสิทธิ์การเป็น Steward โดยดูจากความคิดเห็นของชุมชนและข้อแก้ต่างของตัวผู้ที่ถูกกล่าวถึง Steward ทุกคนจะต้องผ่านกระบวนการนี้หลังจากการลงคะแนน

ดูเพิ่ม:

Tiếng Việt:

Tiến trình xác nhận 2015–16 sẽ bắt đầu từ ngày 8 tháng 2, và kết thúc vào ngày 27 tháng 2.

Tiến trình xác nhận tiếp viên 2015–16 là một cơ hội tốt để kiểm tra xem chúng ta có đang cảm thấy hài lòng với những tiếp viên hiện tại của chúng ta hay không. Để giúp tiến trình trở nên suôn sẽ nhất có thể, dưới đây là cách tiến hành.

Để bình luận, vui lòng đăng nhập bằng một tài khoản có chỉnh sửa (trên bất kì wiki nào) trước ngày 1 tháng 2 năm 2015. Trong trang Bầu cử 2015, xin hãy đề cập nếu bạn không hài lòng với cách dùng công cụ tiếp viên của bất kỳ cá nhân nào dưới đây và lý do tại sao. Ví dụ, bạn có thể nói về việc họ ngưng hoạt động. Những tiếp viên không hoạt động, như đã nêu trong quy định tiếp viên, sẽ bị tước quyền truy cập.

Vào cuối cuộc bầu cử, những tiếp viên hiện tại và mới được bầu sẽ xem xét khiếu nại trong trang này, và việc chọn lựa để tước quyền tiếp viên sẽ được thực thi nếu họ không làm thỏa mãn lời bình luận trái chiều của cộng đồng, đồng thời họ phải nêu ra được quan điểm của riêng mình và sự hiểu biết đối với công việc. Tất cả các tiếp viên được bầu trước tháng 2 năm 2015 sẽ phải tham gia tiến trình này.

Xem thêm:

粵語:

2015-16年監管員嘅確認程序將會係2月8日開始,2月27日就完啦。

2015-16年監管員確認程序可以俾社群確認對而家嘅執行員係咪滿意。為了令到程序儘量流暢,以下呢就係確認程序嘅組織方式。

係2015年2月1日之前係任意wiki上編輯過嘅用戶都可以登入之後作出評論。係2015年選舉期內,對下面呢班執行員,您可以對任何一位或者幾位指出您對佢地嘅執行員工作係咪滿意,同埋講低原因。例如,您可以依據監管員方針,將不活躍做原因廿列出嚟。不活躍嘅監管員會俾人拎走個權限。

係本次選舉結束後,在任嘅同埋新上任嘅監管員會考慮呢版嘅投訴,結合社群嘅意見同埋佢地對工作嘅理解同看法,睇下係咪拎走一堆執行員嘅權限。所有2015年2月以前上任嘅執行員都要經過確認程序。

參見:

中文(简体):

2015-16年监管员确认程序将于2月8日开始,2月27日结束。

2015-16年监管员确认程序可供社群确认对目前的监管员是否满意。为了使程序尽量流畅,以下为确认程序的组织方式。

在2015年2月1日前在任意wiki上作出过编辑的用户可以登入后作出评论。在2015年选举期内,对以下列出的监管员,您可以对任何一位或几位指出您对他们的监管员工作是否满意,并说明原因。例如,您可以依据监管员方针,将不活跃作为原因列出。不活跃的监管员将会失去权限。

在本次选举结束后,在任的及新上任的监管员将考虑本页上的投诉,结合社群的意见以及他们对工作的理解和看法,决定是否移除一些监管员。所有2015年2月以前上任的监管员将需要经过确认程序。

参见:

中文(繁體):

2015-16年監管員確認程序將於2月8日開始,2月27日結束。

2015-16年監管員確認程序可供社群確認對目前的監管員是否滿意。為了使程序儘量流暢,以下為確認程序的組織方式。

在2015年2月1日前在任意wiki上作出過編輯的用戶可以登入後作出評論。在2015年選舉期內,對以下列出的監管員,您可以對任何一位或幾位指出您對他們的監管員工作是否滿意,並說明原因。例如,您可以依據監管員方針,將不活躍作為原因列出。不活躍的監管員將會失去許可權。

在本次選舉結束後,在任的及新上任的監管員將考慮本頁上的投訴,結合社群的意見以及他們對工作的理解和看法,決定是否移除一些監管員。所有2015年2月以前上任的監管員將需要經過確認程序。

參見:


Purge the cache of this page?


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en, fr-1
  • Personal info: Hello everyone. These are my first confirmations as I was elected in 2014. Over the last year, I've been very active in cross-wiki work, especially in counter-spam, counter-vandalism and cleaning up after some repeat abusers. I've been involved to a lesser extent in most areas of steward work. I've made some mistakes over the last year, mainly at the start of my term as a steward, but I hope that the good has outweighed the bad. I would love to serve another term as a steward should the community wish to keep me in such a role. I will continue to be active in all of my previous areas, and don't foresee any issues over the next year that would prevent me from continuing to volunteer as a steward. Thanks, Ajraddatz (talk) 06:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments about Ajraddatz

edit
  • Keep Keep Sloppel. Vogone (talk) 18:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Very good work as a steward. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Avi (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Ajraddatz has done a tremendous amount of sound and thoughtful work in the past year and they've also been very active behinds the scenes. I was not sure last year, I am quite glad that my doubts were for nothing :) Snowolf How can I help? 18:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Helping the users and as is also active. --Uğurkenttalk 18:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • It is true that he made mistakes at the beginning, but I really think he has grown into the role. It is also true that our disagreements on various issues are frequent, but Ajraddatz is willing to consider other viewpoints and adjust his own, should he feel that it is necessary. I have no concerns for him continuing as a steward. Keep Keep --Rschen7754 18:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Alan (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, no concerns. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. For sure. LlamaAl (talk) 18:30, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Thank you edit conflict! :p , <3 you ajr.--AldNonBicara? 18:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment info Executed a permission request which later evolved into a wheel war.[1] --Nemo 18:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
    FWIW, that was a particular case which stewards shouldn't have been asked to handle in the first place, and should not happen again. I certainly regret the issues that that action caused, though it should be noted that I was just one of a number of steward involved in that issue cross-wiki. Ajraddatz (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matiia (talk) 18:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Eurodyne (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Érico Wouters (msg) 18:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - No problems. :) George.Edward.C (talk) 19:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Good job as steward.--Syum90 (talk) 19:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Nothing to complain about. –Ejs-80 21:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Sure, helpful. ~ Nahid Talk 21:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - satisfactory performance of the role. The JurgenNL matter was not this user's fault. Green Giant (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Atcovi (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Armbrust (talk) 21:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Igor Windsor (talk) 22:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Good Work. Why not?--DangSunM (talk) 22:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, good job — NickK (talk) 23:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, wish you to have a good 2015. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Good work. MBisanz talk 00:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Per Vogone's comment. SPQRobin (talk) 01:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • strong keepDerHexer (Talk) 01:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--GZWDer (talk) 01:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Active and does good work. INeverCry 03:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Pundit (talk) 07:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Sehr gerne --Itti (talk) 08:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep White Master (es) 09:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matanya (talk) 10:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Did what I expected when I voted for him last year. ;-) Clueful and helpful steward. Trijnsteltalk 13:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Strong keep One of the best. --AmaryllisGardener talk 14:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep IW 16:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Southparkfan 19:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, please — Arkanosis 21:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep of course, near to best. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Taichi - (あ!) 08:32, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 11:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Green Zero обг 13:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, good impressions.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Geagea (talk) 21:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep obviously.--Jasper Deng (talk) 21:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep ~ DanielTom (talk) 00:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Abd (talk) 02:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Az1568 (talk) 06:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - QuiteUnusual (talk) 11:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Widr (talk) 11:50, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:21, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
    Is this the official view of the WMF? PiRSquared17 (talk) 13:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Rzuwig 21:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Highly efficient and hard working ..--Stemoc 21:17, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep GeorgeBarnick (talk) 07:03, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Has done excellent work. --Glaisher (talk) 16:33, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Varina (talk) 17:28, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:58, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Grind24 (talk) 22:29, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Neozoon (talk) 00:02, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 00:28, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Good work! Tony Tan98 · talk 21:57, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Obviously. If he is not the most active steward, he has to at least be close to it. --Biblioworm (talk) 22:18, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Ysjbserver (talk) 06:31, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 13:35, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep—Highly active in most of the steward related areas and helpful--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 09:52, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Calak (talk) 09:20, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Irwin Dime 02:24, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Defender (talk) 02:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, Conny (talk) 15:30, 19 February 2015 (UTC).
  • Keep Keep --Tremonist (talk) 15:12, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:53, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep All good, Elfix 09:29, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Definitely needed --Gobbler (talk) 22:24, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. --Wiki13 talk 12:03, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Nolispanmo (talk) 08:59, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep StudiesWorld (talk) 11:01, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Of course... -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 01:17, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:35, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep ///EuroCarGT 01:37, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FiliP ██ 23:59, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Stewards should follow up. -- Sidelight12 03:54, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
    Where have I not? Ajraddatz (talk) 03:59, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Of course! Thehelpfulone 00:31, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --アルトクール(jaWN / jaWP) 05:43, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Support. No problem. --►Cekli829 13:50, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Wnme 15:29, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Ruy Pugliesi 17:41, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en, he-2
  • Personal info: It is again with pleasure that I note that the steward body has been able to support the Wikimedia family of projects. My own contribution as steward this past year was less obvious, as I volunteered to support the corpus of Wikimedia projects as a member m:Ombudsman commission. As one of the new volunteers had to withdraw prior to the term starting, I will continue to serve on the commission this year. I request of you the privilege and opportunity to continue to serve Wikimedia as a steward, as I feel I still provide value, whether it be actively on-wiki or through discussions and consensus-building among the stewards as the cases require. As always, I appreciate your collective trust in allowing me this opportunity, and I hope to continue to be worthy of your trust in the coming year.

Comments about Avraham

edit
  • Remove Remove, since I oppose the ombudsman-steward double role for various reasons. Vogone (talk) 18:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Holmium (talk) 18:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove I don't agree a steward being member of the OC during the same time. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove low activity on commons (where he hod sysop and os), please become there active before becoming steward again. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Avraham has often provided a quite helpful mix of experience, sound advice and willingness to question and change things for the better and I for one definitively benefited from their guidance and thought-provoking efforts in the past year. Snowolf How can I help? 18:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Not because I do not trust Avraham (I think he's been doing a great job as a Commons oversighter, and I cannot comment on his OC activity due to lack of information), but because I think that being a steward and a member of the Ombudsman Commission is a conflict of interest and violates the principle of separation of powers, given that the OC are supposed to investigate misuse of the CheckUser tool which all stewards have access to. odder (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove solely because I don't think that stewards should be on the Ombudsman Commission. Not for the usual reasons of people wanting the auditors and stewards to be different people, but because in the two other recent cases of a steward/OC combination it has not worked out well for them, with a sharp reduction in steward activity, and then a resignation from either stewardship or the OC. I feel that the roles are incompatible because the time needed to serve in both roles is too great, and one or the other gets robbed greatly. Avraham's activity has gone down similar to the other two cases, and with all the other rights they hold and the lengthy track record of inactivity in them, I fear that they will be mostly inactive next term. --Rschen7754 18:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep the "double role" issue should be, imho, solved in another way. Please don't forget "oppose" here means he won't be back to be steward without a new election. --Vituzzu (talk) 18:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Per Vogone. Eurodyne (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove, per Rschen. Érico Wouters (msg) 18:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Uğurkenttalk 19:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - If they can handle being on the OC and being a steward, I see no problems. George.Edward.C (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Rax (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC) - weak "keep": I do not support the double role and would really favour to see stewards bearing in mind the importance of checks and balances, herewith asking you to reconsider - you are executing as a steward, and IMHO that's not compatible with investigating complaints potentially directed against stewards actions ...
  • Keep Keep - the concerns about holding two roles are understandable but we have many people who hold multiple advanced permissions. As long as someone can recuse themselves when necessary, there isn't really a problem. Green Giant (talk) 21:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, agree with Green Giant. Armbrust (talk) 21:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Per above.--DangSunM (talk) 22:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, I believe that double jobbing is acceptable as long as steward voluntarily does not engage in any CU actions that are subject to control of the Ombudsman commission. In my view, this double jobbing should be resolved not by removing the steward bit, but by user him/herself restricting his/her activity — NickK (talk) 23:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Unfortunately, it's with a heavy heart that I must oppose. I believe that he's taken on too many roles and has stretched himself too thin with his available time. As an OTRS agent, from the queues that I can see (info-en, commons, permission) his last activity was over a year and a half ago. As a steward, he's only made about 25 logged actions in the past year, with 4 months of zero activity. As a member of the ombudsman committee, I had sent a concern to the group and follow up emails directly to Avraham. Sadly, it took a few weeks to a month between our correspondences. While I'm greatly appreciative for all of his contributions to the project, I think it would be better for the community if he focuses his efforts. Mike VTalk 23:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
    • To be fair, most of the stewards who have "community" OTRS queues are mostly inactive in them too, including myself. --Rschen7754 05:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
    • I've moved to neutral per further conversation with Avraham. Mike VTalk 19:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Only Avraham himself knows whether he has time for both roles. He seems to be confident that he does, so that is enough for me. I don't think it is right for the community to tell a user how to manage their time. This, that and the other (talk) 01:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Member of OmbCom results me, however, the vanguard of Stewardships. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral--GZWDer (talk) 01:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove OC member should not be a stew. — Revi 04:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep As a former ombudsman, I am inclined to think that perhaps separation of roles would not be such a bad idea indeed. But this should be by design, and not through elections. Pundit (talk) 07:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Herby talk thyme 09:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Avraham is not very active on the front-end of steward work, but he is more active in mailing list discussions and such. We need more stewards who actively engage with meaningful comments in those discussions, which he certainly does. Please be a tad more active this next year though :-) Ajraddatz (talk) 09:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
    Change to neutral. If this is the quality I can expect from a steward who is barely active with any of their hats, then that starts to become a problem. The abuse filter system account has been around for quite some time now, and it is rather surprising that you would be unaware of this and further defend your action after thanking it for its service. Ajraddatz (talk) 15:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matanya (talk) 10:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • keepDerHexer (Talk) 12:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Per Ajr. I ask you - though - to become more active throughout the whole year, and not just close to the confirmations. Trijnsteltalk 13:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep KTC (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --AmaryllisGardener talk 14:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep INeverCry 06:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Geagea (talk) 21:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Az1568 (talk) 06:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Wearing too many hats might cause silly little things like this. Widr (talk) 12:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Mjbmr (discussioncontribs) 06:42, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - has my support and trust. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:22, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:17, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:03, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove per Rs Grind24 (talk) 22:30, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Neozoon (talk) 00:04, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per This, that and the other --Zyephyrus (talk) 00:34, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove JoshuaKGarner (talk) 19:27, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep no issues with being OC and steward at the same time, if one has the time to do both. --თოგო (D) 15:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Jc37 (talk) 09:30, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Per Ajr. Also less than 50 logged actions since last march, which is little low (though you are only focusing on user right changes) IMO. Hope Avraham will increase his activity levels--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 10:05, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral per Shanmugamp7. --Glaisher (talk) 17:54, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove re conflict of interest between roles.--KTo288 (talk) 21:17, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - While I'm certainly in a COI here, I personally see no big issues with stewards being also OC members. I would support if the WMF would suspend the rights during the term as OC member, just as they did it some years ago. However, that is something that probably needs to be discussed with WMF. In my point of view, it's not actually fair to oppose someone because he's a member of another committee. That clearly doesn't influence the quality of his work as a steward. -Barras talk 13:01, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Tremonist (talk) 15:12, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:54, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep All good. Elfix 09:29, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Cube52 (talk) 12:02, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I have worked with Avi as a fellow Ombudsman. I am confident that any misuse of powers because of being both a steward and a member of OC is irrelevant. He is very knowledgable and cautious about matters of privacy, and I trust him 100% in his role as a steward. Huji (talk) 17:59, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Conflict of interest. StudiesWorld (talk) 11:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 01:19, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:42, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, trusted member. - Mailer Diablo (talk) 18:20, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep ///EuroCarGT 01:44, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral per Ajraddatz Glaisher (talk) 17:10, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Sidelight12 03:32, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep COI can be minimized by not performing controversial OS / CUs. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:33, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Per Pmlineditor. Ruy Pugliesi 17:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: de, en-4, fr-1
  • Personal info: This is my fourth steward confirmation, as I've been elected in 2011. I sadly was not as active in this year as in the years before due to some real life commitments. I've used the steward tools for various purposes. Mostly I dealt with vandalism and spam and locked and blocked many users and IPs. I also did some right changes, mostly per request on SRP. The only part of the stewards' work I've not yet really dealt with is the global rename stuff as I feel that there are currently enough qualified people to deal with those requests. Looking at the last years, I really enjoyed the work with my fellow stewards and would love to continue that work for another year. I try to help wherever help is needed, on IRC and also on-wiki. If you've any question, just ask me. Please note that I will be serving on the Ombudsmen commission for the next term. Just want to make sure I don't possibly hide any facts you may want to know before commenting here!

Comments about Barras

edit
  • Remove Remove, since I oppose the ombudsman-steward double role for various reasons. Otherwise fine. Vogone (talk) 18:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Holmium (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove I don't agree a steward being member of the OC during the same time. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Barras is very active as always and is a very sound and helpful steward. The Wikimedia community definitively benefits from their hard work. Snowolf How can I help? 18:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral OC member --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove For exactly the same reasons as regarding @Avraham. odder (talk) 18:48, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment info He thought appropriate to take part into a local vote about a wheel war involving a fellow steward. However, he had taken part into a handful similar local processes before.[2] --Nemo 18:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep the "double role" issue should be, imho, solved in another way. Please don't forget "oppose" here means he won't be back to be steward without a new election. --Vituzzu (talk) 18:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Eurodyne (talk) 18:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Very active. --Uğurkenttalk 19:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - No issues. George.Edward.C (talk) 19:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • I really don't understand your participation in the global renamers discussion [3]. Not only did you add an additional oppose where Snowolf had already done so (see comments below), but you persisted in doing so even after complaints about this practice had been made on the talk page, on IRC, and on the list; this was needlessly provocative.

    But that being said, my comments about Avraham being on the OC and continuing as a steward also apply here. Remove Remove --Rschen7754 19:29, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Good job as steward.--Syum90 (talk) 19:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep As long as he does a good job, being him on the OC is no problem for me.--Enst38 (talk) 20:48, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Rax (talk) 21:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC) - a bit weak "keep" - really good work as steward and really helpful service (I profited in while doing first formal steps on IRC as CU with clumsy fingers ;) ) - but: I do not support the double role and would really favour to see stewards bearing in mind the importance of checks and balances, herewith asking you to reconsider - you are executing as a steward, and IMHO that's not compatible with investigating complaints potentially directed against stewards actions ...
  • Keep Keep - the concerns about holding two roles are understandable but we have many people who hold multiple advanced permissions. As long as someone can recuse themselves when necessary, there isn't really a problem. Green Giant (talk) 21:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Agree with Green Giant. Armbrust (talk) 21:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, per Rax. Érico Wouters (msg) 22:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Good Work. Why not?--DangSunM (talk) 23:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, I believe that double jobbing is acceptable as long as steward voluntarily does not engage in any CU actions that are subject to control of the Ombudsman commission. In my view, this double jobbing should be resolved not by removing the steward bit, but by user him/herself restricting his/her activity — NickK (talk) 23:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove, Per Vogone. --Laberinto16 (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • remove Barras and Snowolf have shown impossible behaviour in the first election of global renamers and disappointed me a lot by doing this. Even if the Wikimedia Foundation has given us only a short time frame to organize these elections, all stewards and bureaucrats were invited to discuss on the mailinglists and talk pages the proposed policies and procedures which have been prepared by some stewards. Instead if doing so or raising their concerns on the very same, designated discussion places during the elections, they blatantly opposed the innocent candidates whose user rights we steward have taken over without any compensation, suddenly coming out of nowhere, and who we invited to help us with global renames, sharing knowledge, spreading the workload, etc. By doing this, they did not only do harm to the candidates themselves without any valid reason and confused them, they also harmed the steward by making them look like users who either cannot find consensus or accept it (besides disrespectfully trampling on the preparation work or their fellow colleagues). Briefly, I do not expect from a steward to troll elections simply for making a point. That's what I do not understand as collegial behaviour and worthy of stewards. As far as I remember, they did not apologize for this childish behaviour yet which is inacceptable as well and baffles me. —DerHexer (Talk) 01:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
    @DerHexer: I disagree. In first place a policy should be crated before granting _global_ right. The community should decide, and not steward. My 2 cent... --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:22, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
    The name is misleading, the right everything but global. Furthermore, rights were about to be granted to users who held a similar right on their local wikis before, which was revoked forcibly by the WMF. Thus, the communities have decided by appointing bureaucrats, but on meta a chance was given for a metawiki community veto. Vogone (talk) 11:35, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, per above. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, partly per my comment on Avraham above. As regards DerHexer's comment, I would suggest that, having looked at the relevant page, Barras' "formal opposition" to global renamers was done for what was a good reason at the time, and could not have influenced the results (I'm sure Barras was aware of that when he made the votes). This, that and the other (talk) 01:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--GZWDer (talk) 01:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Active and does good work. INeverCry 03:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove OC member should not be a stew. — Revi 04:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I don't know why people want to limit participation of others, I mean, if you can get help from others, ain't that good? and Barras is active doing his steward job, although I know he wouldn't be free using his CU and OS as steward checking LTA as OmbCom member.--AldNonymousBicara? 06:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep As a former ombudsman, I am inclined to think that perhaps separation of roles would not be such a bad idea indeed. But this should be by design, and not through elections. Pundit (talk) 07:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep White Master (es) 09:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep definitely --Herby talk thyme 09:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral As DerHexer, I was very concerned with Barras' blanket opposing of global renamer requests to protest the system. There was ample opporitunity to discuss it prior to that, but he did not engage in much of that discussion. That said, he does good work most of the time, so I won't oppose based on that one incident. I do however think that being able to effectively collaborate with other stewards is an important part of this role, so I am neutral. Ajraddatz (talk) 09:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matanya (talk) 10:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Microchip08 (talk) 12:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep KTC (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Helpful steward who always quickly replies when needed. No issues with the combination steward-ombudsmen. Trijnsteltalk 13:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --AmaryllisGardener talk 14:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Southparkfan 19:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepArkanosis 21:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 11:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Geagea (talk) 21:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove - zu umstritten. --ST 23:08, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Strong keep. Perfectly capable user who undoubtedly will be a great addition to the OC. If any situation arises in which a conflict of interest may exist, I am sure Barras will know how to act appropriately. A fine steward, Barras has always been around to help when needed in most (if not all) steward areas, acting with the wiki's interests at heart, doing what he believed to be right. I greatly value this, and whilst it is possible that his actions regarding the global renamers were not fully 'collegial', keeping such a grudge without discussing it with the users in question for over four months isn't IMO 'collegial' behaviour either. With kind regards, Savhñ 23:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
    • I'm a bit disappointed to see my opinions dismissed as part of a "grudge". For me, opposing long-term stewards is not something I enjoy doing, but I firmly believe that collaboration is important to being a steward, because if our "most trusted" users can't work together, how can we expect anyone else to, on a site where we are working together to gather the sum of all human knowledge? It seems that this is merely a difference in opinion and perception. --Rschen7754 06:36, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
      • From what I understood, your comment was based on the OC-steward combination. I find it however surprising that you conclude from that single incident that this steward, who's been a steward for nearly 4 years, does not collaborate well. I find it also surprising that you complain about bad collaboration while it seems there was no communication on this issue during the last four months, but it was kept against him for this round of confirmations (and that's what I understand to be a grudge, though maybe that's because English is not my native language). I firmly believe straightforward communication is essential for proper collaboration, and that criticism should be shared on the moment and on the appropiate pages (his talk page). If then, after having communicated (ie, made an attempt to understand each other) with the user on this issue, the collaboration issues persist, then I believe it would be fair to oppose here based on collaboration issues, but I hardly doubt that would be the case. In my experience, Barras has always attended and been helpful in the nearly 4 years I've worked with him. Savhñ 15:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
        • I find these comments of yours quite strange. Have you read the discussions back then even? (September 2014 archive of SRGP and esp. Talk:Global renamers#Discussion as to length of candidacies, where similar comments as now were made) For me such a single incident would not be a reason to claim removal, but you cannot deny there have been attempts of communication … Vogone (talk) 18:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
        • In this case, there were past incidents, though minor, that supported my decision. I didn't list them because I don't want this to be a laundry list of all the mistakes that a particular steward has done, and because often they relate to mailing list discussions or the context is related to something that we are bound not to disclose. --Rschen7754 02:31, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Az1568 (talk) 06:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Minimaxima|talk 14:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep of course. Bennylin 21:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Taichi - (あ!) 03:54, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Mjbmr (discussioncontribs) 06:43, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Absolutely has my trust. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:23, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:18, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matiia (talk) 18:16, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:04, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Grind24 (talk) 22:37, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove --Neozoon (talk) 00:05, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 00:36, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep although some of the opposers make good points. Widr (talk) 11:20, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove JoshuaKGarner (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep no issues with being OC and steward at the same time, if one has the time to do both. --თოგო (D) 16:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Berlin-George (talk) 23:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Active and available on IRC whenever needed--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 10:19, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Calak (talk) 09:35, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Glaisher (talk) 17:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove re separation of powers concerns.--KTo288 (talk) 21:23, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Tremonist (talk) 15:11, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:55, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep All good. Elfix 09:29, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Enfcer (talk) 11:23, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Conflict of interest. StudiesWorld (talk) 11:03, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 01:20, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:48, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep ///EuroCarGT 01:57, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Glaisher (talk) 16:39, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepDefender (talk) 03:17, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove -- Sidelight12 03:21, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Zivax (talk) 19:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Of course Thehelpfulone 01:06, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep COI in OC & Steward roles can be minimized if Barras doesn't use his CU / OS rights for controversial cases. Apart from that, does great work. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:30, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Ruy Pugliesi 17:59, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages:
  • Personal info: During the last confirmation I stated that I would return to active duty by mid 2014. Unfortunately due to various irl reasons I was unable to commit and live up to that promise, not because I did not have time at all to carry out the duty, but more because I did not have time to get myself updated with the latest policy, cases and practices. I would not want to act without having a good understanding of what's going on lately.

    I would like to resign my steward position after this election/confirmation. Really appreciate the community's trust in me in the past and I thank all other fellow stewards for their hard and excellent work towards the project.

    --Bencmq (talk) 02:49, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments about Bencmq

edit
  • Question Question: I'm a bit confused: If you would like to resign, why are you standing for confirmation? – Philosopher Let us reason together. 21:04, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
    He isn't. It is customary for resigning stewards to do so by announcing their resignation via the yearly confirmations. Ajraddatz (talk) 21:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
    Thanks, that makes sense. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 20:57, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
    No problem. It is definitely a strange tradition; I can see how it could be confusing. Ajraddatz (talk) 21:51, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
    I guess it gives a better sense of continuity, you know, new volunteers replacing the old :) --Bencmq (talk) 01:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Good luck and thanks for all your work in the past couple of years. Vogone (talk) 18:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your service. -- Avi (talk) 18:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your service! --Rschen7754 18:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbolic Keep Keep. Bencmq has always been historically active and I hope that at some later point in the future, when more free time will be available, they choose to return as a steward. Snowolf How can I help? 18:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks Alan (talk) 18:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Thank you for your service. --Uğurkenttalk 19:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove - Thanks for your hard work! George.Edward.C (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove - Thanx so far. --Enst38 (talk) 20:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove symbolic - strange tradition indeed - thanks for your service in the past! --Rax (talk) 20:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks MQ. Jimmy Xu (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your contribution as a steward. Hopefully we might see you return in the future. Green Giant (talk) 21:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove, and thanks for your service as a steward. Armbrust (talk) 21:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks for all your work!--DangSunM (talk) 23:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Too bad, thanks for your contributions! :-) —DerHexer (Talk) 01:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thx ben. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:22, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Global renamer is what you may like.--GZWDer (talk) 01:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • symbolic Keep Keep - I think there is confusion whether a symbolic "remove" is, in fact, a voice of support for your decision (and thanking you for your hard work), and whether a symbolic "keep" may indicate disagreement with your choice :) Whatever interpretation you choose, my vote is a sign of appreciation. Pundit (talk) 07:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • thank you for your service. Matanya (talk) 10:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • I've got good memories from our collaboration as scrutineers. Sad to see you go and wish you all the best! Trijnsteltalk 13:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your work. Southparkfan 19:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Bennylin 21:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • On behalf of myself and the WMF, thank you for your years of service. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your service! All the best, Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:19, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Danke --Neozoon (talk) 00:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Good luck! and thank you for the work you have given. --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:01, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Good luck, and thank you for everything you've done. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 13:42, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you----Shanmugamp7 (talk) 10:21, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your contributions! --Glaisher (talk) 17:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you, and good luck in all you do.--KTo288 (talk) 21:26, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • you're bureaucrat on zh.wiki, so Global renamer is a good option for the future.--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:01, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove - Unsatisfied with your service. Thanks for resignation. Baycrest (talk) 09:33, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral --Tremonist (talk) 15:10, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you for all your work.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Wish you could stay but I support your decision. StudiesWorld (talk) 11:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your contributions! -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 02:57, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Done some great work, thanks for what you have given, enjoy RL.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:38, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your service. ///EuroCarGT 01:38, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your great contributions. Marvin 2009 (talk) 02:58, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you for all your work! Thehelpfulone 00:32, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your work as a steward! Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:23, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks for all your work. Ruy Pugliesi 17:43, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en, id, jv, etc.
  • Personal info: Yellow. I think this year has been my most active year of combatting vandalism, where (unfortunately) I saw an increasing number of vandals, spammers, and LTA using the language where I'm fluent at doing cross-wiki vandalism. I believe I have used the steward rights well for me to once again ask the Wikimedians community for support for another year of community support. Cheers. Bennylin 20:04, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments about Bennylin

edit


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en
  • Personal info: I offer myself to continue in the role of steward. My work in the past year has continued in anti-vandalism, long term abuse and spam management; in writing and responding to our highly effective spam filters; other tools available for spam tracking; working on the stewards' OTRS queue and within Steward requests, and working cooperatively with checkusers through the projects. I attended WM2014 and participated in numbers of events related to stewardry, adminship and development of tools for the future, I participated in the broader activity space of stewards in the open wiki and in confidential discussions. [A truly useful and rewarding excursion.] I heeded the commentary of 2014, and kept it in mind as I performed duties in 2014. I continue to edit regularly as a standard contributor on numbers of wikis, and to participate in community and bug discussions with that editor/participant hat on. I have taken to a little coding within limitations and running a bot or two. I continue as a highly active and contributing member of the community.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:52, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments about billinghurst

edit
  • Keep Keep trusted --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I saw one of the most active steward. --Uğurkenttalk 18:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Excellent work! -- Avi (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Thanks for all your help handling LTA from Indonesian projects.--AldNonBicara? 18:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Luke081515 (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Perfect! Alan (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Billinghurst does a tremendous amount of work and we all benefit from their efforts, especially the work they've done on checkuser requests and behind the scenes. Snowolf How can I help? 18:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Of course! LlamaAl (talk) 18:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove due to his overuse of steward privileges to perform non-emergency suppressions on Commons in a situation where local oversighters were available and his inability to admit to having made a mistake. odder (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
    • For what it's worth, I have issues with that too, but for different reasons: while it is technically allowed per the CU and OS policies in cross-wiki cases (though very few stewards actually use that provision), this was done on one of his "home wikis". --Rschen7754 18:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
    • If that is true, you said he oversteps, then why is it, on other wiki's he says it's not his responsibility to do anything. Sidelight12 (talk) 04:02, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • It is true that he has the most actions of any steward in history. However, I think that over the years, this fact has changed Billinghurst's attitude, and lately I have seen too many cases where they have forced their own way of doing things and interpretations of policy on others and acted like they are the only steward whose opinion matters, on list, on IRC, and onwiki. Often, they have been rude about it as well, not only to other stewards but to other trusted members of the community. There is a reason why there is more than one elected steward, and it has to do with more than dividing the workload. Remove Remove --Rschen7754 18:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Érico Wouters (msg) 19:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Eurodyne (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep a bright hard worker whose value cannot be obscured by about two catastrophic failures. --Vituzzu (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - No problems. George.Edward.C (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep- Must keep. Jayantanth (talk) 19:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Linedwell@frwiki (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - ok --Rax (talk) 20:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Sure. ~ Nahid Talk 21:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - high level of activity. The actions on Commons mentioned by Odder were a cause of some concern but not enough to oppose this, because my experience of Billinghurst has generally been positive. Green Giant (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Armbrust (talk) 21:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Good Work. Why not?--DangSunM (talk) 23:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepNickK (talk) 23:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Good work. MBisanz talk 00:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • neutral Reasoning as per Rschen but unlike him I see improvements in this regard. —DerHexer (Talk) 01:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I appreciate his technical contributions, as well as his steward work. Also, a fellow Aussie! This, that and the other (talk) 01:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--GZWDer (talk) 01:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Odder and Rschen's comments hold no water, the fact that he is the only steward with the guts to do what right is what i would expect in other stewards, even though its very lacking..the MOST active and the one steward that was in the forefront of getting rid of the major spam problem plaguing wikimedia...--Stemoc 01:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 02:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Active and highly experienced. INeverCry 03:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove doesn't take responsibility as a steward, then makes excuses that it's not his responsibility, when a project is out of hand and unable to take care of itself. Even protected troublesome user, only recently started wising up to it. Sidelight12 (talk) 04:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • He is active and wonderful steward, but his attitude sometimes makes me think "It's not expected behavior for a steward". Thus Neutral Neutral. — Revi 04:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep. Whilst having interacted with Billinghurst both before and during my term as a steward, I have never experienced any arrogance or any other behaviour which made me feel uncomfortable. On the contrary, Billinghurst has regularly been helpful providing valuable assistance. Savhñ 06:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Pundit (talk) 07:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Sehr gerne --Itti (talk) 08:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Why not Keep Keep I guess... ;-) --Herby talk thyme 09:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep net positive, though I understand the concerns raised above and hope you take them to heart. Ajraddatz (talk) 09:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Syum90 (talk) 09:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matanya (talk) 10:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Microchip08 (talk) 12:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep We don't always agree, but you have for sure a real wiki-heart. Very active, very experienced and cannot be missed. :) Trijnsteltalk 13:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove per Rschen. --AmaryllisGardener talk 14:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep JAn Dudík (talk) 17:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Southparkfan 19:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, please — Arkanosis 21:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepDanny B. 01:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral per Revi. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral for now. Sure works hard but his attitude and arrogance encountered for no reason when asking help with a cross wiki vandal was most unpleasant. Seems to have forgotten a steward is meant to serve and help. MoiraMoira (talk) 11:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Tufor (talk) 13:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Geagea (talk) 21:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep best steward, helpful and fair. ~ DanielTom (talk) 23:57, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Abd (talk) 02:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Az1568 (talk) 06:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- QuiteUnusual (talk) 11:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Widr (talk) 12:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Mjbmr (discussioncontribs) 06:43, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep With my deepest respect, Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:26, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matiia (talk) 18:34, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove - bad work. A steward who don't know, when he is not allowed to act, is a terrible steward! Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:06, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Grind24 (talk) 22:40, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 00:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep A bit harsh at times, indeed, but has a very pragmatic approach towards the use of the steward tools, something that many people seem to have forgotten lately. Elfix 14:53, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral JoshuaKGarner (talk) 19:30, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Ankry (talk) 22:10, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Very active and trustworthy. PiRSquared17 (talk) 22:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Begoon (talk) 06:03, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Joe Watzmo (talk) 19:31, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Litlok (talk) 21:25, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Tpt (talk) 19:05, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Helped/Trained me in handling LTA's & Spambots. Some times i don't understand his English, but that's fine :P--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 10:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I also sometimes don't understand his English. :P Glaisher (talk) 17:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Irwin Dime 02:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, Conny (talk) 15:31, 19 February 2015 (UTC).
  • Keep Keep, --KTo288 (talk) 21:30, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Probably the most active steward around and without him, a lot of work would probably only be done very delayed! His work here is invaluable. -Barras talk 12:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Tremonist (talk) 15:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:57, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --LadyInGrey (talk) 02:19, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Marine-Bluetalkcontribs 04:09, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Sarah (SV) talk 05:39, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Enfcer (talk) 11:25, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. --Wiki13 talk 12:03, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep one of the most productive and helpful stewards as far as I know Huji (talk) 18:02, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep StudiesWorld (talk) 11:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:12, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 18:22, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep ///EuroCarGT 01:57, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FiliP ██ 00:06, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepDefender (talk) 03:18, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Good afternoon (talk) 13:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Zivax (talk) 19:00, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Thehelpfulone 00:44, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep He is working actively.--アルトクール(jaWN / jaWP) 05:49, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Calak (talk) 15:21, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Ruy Pugliesi 17:57, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages:
  • Personal info: I have been a steward since 2012 and would like to continue with that position. While my activity has dropped, I am still watching for any issues that may arise (spambots for example). I plan to be more active in user right changes and other duties.

Comments about Bsadowski1

edit


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1
  • Personal info: Dear readers,

    I'm one of the longest continuously serving stewards as I was elected back in December 2007 (300,000 global edits and more than 1 mio. logged actions, sysop on some wikis). With my broad experience in handling steward actions, I'm not only dealing with almost all kinds of them (mostly via IRC) but also advise new stewards and help as a contact person between stewards, communities and developers. For that purpose, I created help pages and several reports for the announced Single User Login finalisation, had meetups at last two Wikimanias and on IRC with developers and functionaries involved, helped prepare policies like the Global rename policy, Global renamers page, Usurpation policy, and did many more in this regard. I engaged myself a lot with global renames and am currently the most active one of them, having done more than 500 actions. While we stewards wait for the next tools like account merge (we recently got a Special request page but are still beta-testing), I notified hundreds of users on all Wikimedia projects that their accounts are not yet unified or do clash with others and provided help, did thousands of usurpations following the Usurpation policy in order to reduce the amount of clashing accounts and workload for all of us when SUL finalisation will happen (see crossactivity as long as rightstool doesn't work), etc. By doing this and during bug testing before deployment, I found a couple of bugs esp. in CentralAuth and Renameuser tools, most of them are already fixed, few of them are currently blocking the progress of SUL finalisation but I'm confident that we can go on very soon, I will continue notifying people and keep my local community updated.

    Beside my intensive and time-consuming work for making SUL finalisation finally happen (waiting for it since 2008), I occupied myself with CheckUser activities mostly on loginwiki (in what I was not as experienced as in Oversight rights that I hold on metawiki and which were one my main steward activities before besides crosswiki antivandalism stuff) and closed a difficult crosswiki CheckUser case in collaboration with German, French and English CheckUsers in early 2014. Unfortunately, this troll continued his actions which caused in several follow-up requests on loginwiki which explains my high stats there. Besides, a couple of German administrators requested a removal of their sysop rights on my user talk page and I granted this request according to our policy which caused a couple of uncontroversial steward actions on one of my homewikis. Last year, some fellows were unhappy about my German-only statements on the steward candidates which they considered to be too much influencing the voters' behavior due to my position while my intention was to invite people on dealing with the candidates themselves and participate in the elections at all. And while I do think that stewards too should be allowed to raise their opinion when- and wherever they want, I do see the point that notifying the candidates on these comments would have been fairer. I will abstain from doing this again and will refrain from commenting elections at all. That's even more useful as I became a member of the steward election committee again (a job I did in the last couple of years too). All in all, I'd be happy to serve the community and my fellows with my experience for the next term, especially for the crunch mode of SUL finalisation and the expectable busy aftermath. Thank you!

Comments about DerHexer

edit
  • Keep Keep Ok. Vogone (talk) 18:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep trusted --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Holmium (talk) 18:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep rubin16 (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep selbstverständlich. -- Avi (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep trusted Luke081515 (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep selbstverständlich. --Emes (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep very helpful! --Emptywords (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Helping the users and as is also active. --Uğurkenttalk 18:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Oi oi oi! Slow down a bit will ya? You leave other steward "Jobless" :p .--AldNonBicara? 18:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Sure, he made mistakes, but he is always willing to address others' concerns, even when he does not fully agree with them. --Rschen7754 18:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Alan (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Very experiencied and active. LlamaAl (talk) 18:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matiia (talk) 18:48, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Excellent work, trustworthy. Danke für deinen Einsatz, Troubled @sset   Work    Talk    Mail   18:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Érico Wouters (msg) 19:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Managed to stay neutral in a local vote about a wheel war involving a fellow steward. [4] --Nemo 19:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Ohne Zweifel. Eurodyne (talk) 19:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - -Sator (talk) 19:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Good job as a steward.--Syum90 (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --George.Edward.C (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Linedwell@frwiki (talk) 19:48, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - stay tuned ;) (und bleib gesund!) - Grüße --Rax (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Jonathan Groß (talk) 21:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Sure, hard working person :) ~ Nahid Talk 21:30, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - experienced user. Green Giant (talk) 21:48, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 21:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Armbrust (talk) 22:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Igor Windsor (talk) 22:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --BeverlyHillsCop (talk) 22:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Why not?--DangSunM (talk) 23:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Strong keep, extremely helpful in global renaming process — NickK (talk) 23:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Good work. MBisanz talk 00:22, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Selbstverständlich. SPQRobin (talk) 01:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep By far the most experienced and one of the most active stewards on the wiki, he should remain for another year.. Go Hexy!...--Stemoc 01:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Absolutely Keep Keep, per all above. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --GZWDer (talk) 01:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 03:22, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep not only because of skills, experience, and activity, but also because of friendly support, tutoring, advice. Pundit (talk) 07:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep sehr gerne --Itti (talk) 08:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Herby talk thyme 09:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep DerHexer has helped a lot with global renaming, going well beyond what is expected of anyone involved in the process and helping to make SUL finalization a reality. He even does great work in the other parts of being a steward! Ajraddatz (talk) 09:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matanya (talk) 11:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep KTC (talk) 13:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Though I disagree with your opinion about Snowolf and Barras & feel you're a bit too attached to the global rename stuff. Trijnsteltalk 13:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep  @xqt 13:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Makes excellent office. --Funkruf (talk) 13:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Stefan64 (talk) 13:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Altsprachenfreund (talk) 14:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • -jkb- 14:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC) Keep Keep
  • Keep Keep --Wahrerwattwurm (talk) 14:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --AmaryllisGardener talk 14:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep IW 16:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Kein Einstein (talk) 16:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Dietzel65 (talk) 16:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Bubo 16:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep JAn Dudík (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Andreas Werle (talk) 18:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Southparkfan 19:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, please — Arkanosis 21:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, best steward! --Brackenheim (talk) 00:32, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep
    Danny B. 01:57, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep INeverCry 06:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 11:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep XenonX3 (talk) 12:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Tufor (talk) 13:39, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Geagea (talk) 21:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - stets engagiert. --ST 23:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Alan ffm (talk) 00:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Az1568 (talk) 06:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - QuiteUnusual (talk) 11:31, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Widr (talk) 11:52, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep without any doubt. Bennylin 21:47, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep – sensitive, multilingual, highly intelligent, socially and politically adept. Tony (talk) 09:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep—with my respect and admiration. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:27, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Nicola (talk) 21:55, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:21, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Varina (talk) 17:13, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Mr Wikimedia. All here will see, how important he is for everything, when he will be gone some time. I don't know a second person who lives Wikipedia in a way as DerHexer does. Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:08, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --APPER (talk) 21:17, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep trusted Grind24 (talk) 21:59, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Ciell (talk) 22:44, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. WJBscribe (talk) 00:42, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Filterkaffee (talk) 08:35, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Joe Watzmo (talk) 19:25, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Litlok (talk) 21:27, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Ldorfman (talk) 13:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepSturmjäger (talk) 19:34, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Strong keep Apseluuut! --Ana al'ain (talk) 20:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Berlin-George (talk) 23:12, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Certainly. Acalamari 10:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Vachovec1 (talk) 17:33, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Mar del Sur (talk) 21:11, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep—very trustworthy and excellently working steward -- Doc Taxon (talk) 03:49, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Micha (talk) 07:11, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Martin E. Walder (talk) 08:51, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- --Filiusque (talk) 10:12, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, Conny (talk) 15:32, 19 February 2015 (UTC).
  • Keep Keep --Kritzolina (talk) 21:13, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Tremonist (talk) 14:49, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep All good for der Hexer. Elfix 09:35, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Enfcer (talk) 11:27, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. --Wiki13 talk 12:04, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep one of the most helpful and productive stewards as far as I know. Huji (talk) 18:03, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Nolispanmo (talk) 09:03, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep StudiesWorld (talk) 11:09, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 07:32, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:42, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Gerhardvalentin (talk) 15:55, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 18:25, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep ///EuroCarGT 01:48, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Glaisher (talk) 15:52, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FiliP ██ 00:00, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep es:Magister Mathematicae 03:59, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep No concerns --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 07:21, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepDefender (talk) 17:26, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Sidelight12 03:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Biosthmors (talk) 15:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep What more can I say? --MB-one (talk) 15:54, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Without a doubt! Thehelpfulone 00:39, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Gereon K. (talk) 11:57, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:31, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --►Cekli829 13:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral (upon request) ^^ → «« Man77 »» [de] 15:23, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Wnme 15:25, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Ruy Pugliesi 17:55, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: fr, en-3
  • Personal info: As always, my activity (that has remained moderate but consistent for the past few years) was mainly about inhibiting activity from long-term abusers and spambots. With your approbation, I would like to carry on for a 4th year. Elfix 18:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments about Elfix

edit


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: de, en-3
  • Personal info: Hello everyone, after being elected as a steward last year I'm now standing for my first confirmation. I have been a Wikimedian since 2008, active in the Small Wiki Monitoring Team since 2010 and have been global rollbacker and a global administrator until I got elected as a steward. Also I'm an administrator on Wikidata and casually active on various other projects.

    At some point in 2010 I started developing tools for common global vandalism fighter tasks. Due to my growing experience in these areas I later on got into the development of MediaWiki and MediaWiki extensions. Nowadays I volunteer to maintain two MediaWiki extensions related to steward tasks which are used on Wikimedia Wikis: CentralAuth and AbuseFilter. Besides, I'm working as a Wikidata developer for Wikimedia Germany.

    In the past year I did a lot of technical work on global rename and on preparing the SUL finalization together with mainly DerHexer and several Wikimedia Foundation developers (mainly Legoktm). Due to the heavy involvement in technical things, I haven't been as active as some of my colleagues in other fields, but still I kept a steady rate of actions and also still did some work in the global administrator area.

    My main goal for the next year is to help with finishing up the SUL finalization on both the technical and the non-technical (steward) side of things. On top of that, I'll assist my fellow stewards with other technical things and will of course stay active in various fields of steward work. I'm usually contactable via IRC whenever I'm on my computer, sometimes until early in the morning (UTC). - Hoo man (talk) 19:57, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments about Hoo man

edit
  • Keep Keep Ok. Vogone (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Holmium (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Avi (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Luke081515 (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep 'hoos the man? YOU ARE! 'hoos the man? YOU ARE!--AldNonBicara? 18:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Well, his actions at [7] were unimpressive. But otherwise, Keep Keep in hopes he will learn from this mistake and similar ones. --Rschen7754 18:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Alan (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Hoo man has very active over the year and has brought much needed technical expertise and connections to the development team. Snowolf How can I help? 18:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment info He thought appropriate to take part into a local vote about a wheel war involving a fellow steward. However, he had taken part into similar local processes before.[8] --Nemo 18:48, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. His technical knowledge and overall experience are vital. LlamaAl (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Érico Wouters (msg) 19:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Due to his willingness to canvass-vote in local votes despite not being involved in the project in question on a regular basis. While I respect your vote against me, I find it hard to believe that you took part in that vote by accident, and responding to canvassing, as it appears, is a quality I do not look forward to seeing in a steward. odder (talk) 19:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Eurodyne (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Uğurkenttalk 19:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Good job as a steward.--Syum90 (talk) 19:48, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Linedwell@frwiki (talk) 19:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - ok! gerne weitermachen - Grüße --Rax (talk) 20:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Jonathan Groß (talk) 21:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Sure, helpful. ~ Nahid Talk 21:29, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Armbrust (talk) 22:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Green Giant (talk) 22:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Igor Windsor (talk) 22:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Wht not?--DangSunM (talk) 23:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepNickK (talk) 23:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Good work. MBisanz talk 00:22, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • strong keep for his invaluable work on the technical side of stewardship. —DerHexer (Talk) 01:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Absolutely Keep Keep. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Please be more active this year.--GZWDer (talk) 01:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Pundit (talk) 07:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Sehr gerne --Itti (talk) 08:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Herby talk thyme 09:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Per DerHexer. Ajraddatz (talk) 09:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matanya (talk) 11:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Definitely, for your overall help but also for your technical skills. Especially since Pathoschild left the steward group in 2014. Trijnsteltalk 13:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Selbsverständlich --C3r4 (talk) 14:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --AmaryllisGardener talk 14:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep IW 16:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Valuable user, especially when it comes to tech stuff :) George.Edward.C (talk) 16:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep JAn Dudík (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Southparkfan 19:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, please — Arkanosis 21:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Brackenheim (talk) 00:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Hoo!
    Danny B. 01:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Hoo the best! XD Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 11:34, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Tufor (talk) 13:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Az1568 (talk) 06:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Widr (talk) 16:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep indispensable. Bennylin 21:48, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Mjbmr (discussioncontribs) 06:42, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep—with my respect and admiration. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:28, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Varina (talk) 17:25, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matiia (talk) 18:18, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Yo, man! ;) Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:08, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Grind24 (talk) 22:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Tpt (talk) 19:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Berlin-George (talk) 23:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 20:04, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Calak (talk) 09:31, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - QuiteUnusual (talk) 10:41, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Vachovec1 (talk) 17:36, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Doc Taxon (talk) 03:53, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, Conny (talk) 15:32, 19 February 2015 (UTC).
  • Keep Keep --Kritzolina (talk) 21:15, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Tremonist (talk) 16:46, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 16:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep All good. Elfix 09:35, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Enfcer (talk) 11:28, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. --Wiki13 talk 12:04, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Nolispanmo (talk) 09:05, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep StudiesWorld (talk) 11:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 07:36, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:38, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep ///EuroCarGT 01:39, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Glaisher (talk) 15:53, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FiliP ██ 00:01, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Per Trijnstel--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 07:14, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepDefender (talk) 15:01, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove -- Sidelight12 03:44, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Of course! Thehelpfulone 00:32, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Gereon K. (talk) 11:55, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:24, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep No problem. --►Cekli829 13:51, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Wnme 15:28, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Ruy Pugliesi 17:45, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: ml, hi-1, en-3
  • Personal info: I was entrusted with the tools by the community in 2010 and would like to continue if the community allows. For the past year, I have been mostly focussed on being available in IRC channels to help out with emergencies. I would like to be a bit more active this year, as I am stabilizing a bit more on the personal real life craziness a bit more.

Comments about Jyothis

edit


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en-3, it, de-1, es-1, fr-1
  • Personal info: I am a Steward since 2006 and I'd like to continue this service. Even if not in the high activity, I follow the mailing list and monitor meta.wiki logs and RfP page. I also can be reached on meta user talk page, that is set to E-mail me when changed. I am also reachable on IRC as m7, usually in the afternoon CET, and a client sits for me in various channels when I am away. During the last year I joined the Ombudsman Commission but I had to quit due to lack of time. I also went to London and met a lot of wikies and some fellow Stewards during Wikimania 2014.

Comments about M7

edit


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: fa, az, en-3, tr-2
  • Personal info: Hello, I would like to serve as a steward for another year, I have been active throughout this year in different levels, depending on my free time, I was also available on IRC almost everyday for past year, IRC would assist stewards to help community in emergency and urgent issues.

Comments about Mardetanha

edit
  • Keep Keep Ok. Vogone (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Avi (talk) 18:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, still active.--AldNonBicara? 18:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Rschen7754 18:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Érico Wouters (msg) 19:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Mardetanha is active, sound and provides important language expertise to the steward team. Snowolf How can I help? 19:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep He thought appropriate to take part into a local vote about a wheel war involving a fellow steward. He did not explicitly declare his double hat, but among the stewards voting in that discussion he was the only one with a clear local interest/"right" to vote, being a user very active locally, also in dozens other similar votes, as well as a local administrator. [9] --Nemo 19:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Per Snowolf. Eurodyne (talk) 19:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep-- ARASH PT  talk  19:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Uğurkenttalk 19:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep H.Fatemi 19:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Arash (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--XOXOXO (talk) 19:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Sure.--Calak (talk) 21:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove As we said Iranian people who lives in Iran must not have access to people's privacy. He check usered me and I'm not happy about it no further information. Relating non-related users together plus being violent with new users. Hat collecting sine 2007, having access without doing a job. Being supportive with people who are violent with NPOV, and acting violent with NPOV recently. For users safty, and NPOV policy, I want him access removed as well as removation of check users in our project. I ignore what he said to me recently in IRC, no more forcing me. Mjbmr (discussioncontribs) 21:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Sahehco (talk) 21:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 21:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Sure, helpful. ~ Nahid Talk 21:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Amir (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Armbrust (talk) 22:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Green Giant (talk) 22:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --DangSunM (talk) 23:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepNickK (talk) 23:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:47, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Good work. MBisanz talk 00:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • keepDerHexer (Talk) 01:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Not very active (worse than Shizhao), but if he want to keep his right, he will do so.--GZWDer (talk) 01:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Pundit (talk) 07:22, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Herby talk thyme 09:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matanya (talk) 11:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Not the most active steward, but his input as Middle East/Farsi native speaker is invaluable. Trijnsteltalk 13:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --AmaryllisGardener talk 14:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep IW 16:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - No problems. George.Edward.C (talk) 16:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Southparkfan 19:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep
    Danny B. 02:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep INeverCry 06:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 11:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Az1568 (talk) 06:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Per Trijnstel. Widr (talk) 17:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Bennylin 21:50, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep – Valuable. Tony (talk) 09:43, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep—with my respect and admiration. Over the years, Mard has proven to be an exceptional steward. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:34, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:24, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep دن کیشوت (talk) 21:37, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Sicaspi (talk) 22:28, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Ciell (talk) 22:45, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Grind24 (talk) 23:01, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matiia (talk) 23:46, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Zyephyrus (talk) 20:32, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep-KTo288 (talk) 21:36, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Tremonist (talk) 16:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 17:00, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep OK, all good. Elfix 09:37, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Gire 3pich2005 (talk) 21:38, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. --Wiki13 talk 12:05, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Huji (talk) 18:03, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Nolispanmo (talk) 09:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep StudiesWorld (talk) 11:14, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 07:39, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:48, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep ///EuroCarGT 02:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Glaisher (talk) 16:24, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FiliP ██ 00:02, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral barely active, and by extension not keeping up-to-date with current practices and procedures. For example, he didn't know that local IPBE flags no longer exempt users from global blocks automatically, and did not follow lengthy discussions on the topic earlier this year. I have no problem with people misunderstanding certain things or making mistakes, however, when it seems to be caused by a complete lack of activity it becomes an issue for me. Ajraddatz (talk) 08:01, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Though I have to say you are completely right, but such thing should be added Global IP block exemptions or IP block exempt, then you can expect everyone to know, such issue should be clearly mentioned there Mardetanha talk 10:07, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
FWIW I was completely wrong about the technical aspect of that, and I've reverted my edit back on that page. Still, I have concerns with inactivity and missing some of the major discussions that have been going on. Ajraddatz (talk) 21:20, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
I always check the conclusions and results, since I am not technical, I rather not weigh in such discussion, anyway though were wrong about your main point, I do respect it and I would do my best to be more active Mardetanha talk 21:23, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepDefender (talk) 03:38, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment Comment Mjbmr's comments concern me, but it is not clear enough to me. -- Sidelight12 05:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Biosthmors (talk) 15:29, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Zivax (talk) 19:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Thehelpfulone 00:40, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep OK --►Cekli829 13:59, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Wnme 16:55, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Ruy Pugliesi 17:59, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: he,en
  • Personal info: Hello, I have been at the same activity level this year: (links: activity, Meta logs), mainly anti-vandalism and rights requests. A nice graph is available here. I'm on IRC regularly and try to be helpful. I'm planning to remain active this year, (if you still want me around). questions and comments are welcome. best Matanya (talk) 06:58, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments about matanya

edit


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: nl, en-3, fr-1, de-1, af-1
  • Personal info: My focus as a steward is usually on countering cross-wiki spam and vandalism. I've also dealt with some long-term abusers from time to time. I spend a considerable amount of time writing and editing articles on my home wiki, and I'm currently serving in the local Arbitration Committee again. Even though I'm not as active as I'd like to be and I feel like I'm less visible as a steward now compared to the previous confirmation in 2014 as well as my election in 2013, I continue to be quite active and the tools are still of good use for me, so I hope to serve another year in this role and I'm looking forward to your feedback. Mathonius (talk)

Comments about Mathonius

edit


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en
  • Personal info: Hello again. It has again been a busy year for me on the projects and in real-life. We finally got SUL finalization and I have kept busy doing renames and performing other global account coordination activities. With the continued naming implementation and the imminent advent of account merging, I believe I still have something to contribute to the community as a Steward and seek confirmation to pursue those and other central-auth tasks, in addition to the other duties and responsibilities of Stewardship. Please feel free to approach me here or on my talk page with any questions or concerns you may have. Thank you. MBisanz talk 02:25, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments about MBisanz

edit
  • Keep Keep Fine until the end of SUL finalisation. After that, changing status to global account renamer may be worth considering. Vogone (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Holmium (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Avi (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove not very active (account locking, ip blocking, right changes, etc.) - for doing renames you can become a global renamer but not a steward. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep though I do have to agree with Vogone, unless there is sustained activity in other areas. --Rschen7754 18:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Érico Wouters (msg) 19:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Per Steinsplitter. Eurodyne (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep MBisanz's expertise on renames is very helpful in this phase, and I hope when the unification is over, they'll go back to other steward matters, as I've always found them insightful and sound. Snowolf How can I help? 19:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Uğurkenttalk 19:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Armbrust (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Green Giant (talk) 22:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --DangSunM (talk) 23:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepNickK (talk) 23:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:48, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • keep as per Snowolf. —DerHexer (Talk) 19:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep aha. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Please be more active this year.--GZWDer (talk) 01:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Less than 100 steward actions since August last year, most of his actions were Global Renames for which he does not need to be a steward...Per Steinsplitter--Stemoc 01:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 03:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Although with your unique set of skills and experience I believe you definitely would be a great asset for the ombudsmen commission :) Pundit (talk) 07:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matanya (talk) 11:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep KTC (talk) 13:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Could be better off as global renamer, but I'd prefer to keep him as a steward. Trijnsteltalk 13:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep IW 16:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep while mainly active with renaming, that is still a steward area, so I have no problems with him continuing in this role. Ajraddatz (talk) 16:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Southparkfan 19:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep INeverCry 06:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 11:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Az1568 (talk) 06:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Widr (talk) 16:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep – We're lucky to have him. Tony (talk) 09:40, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- with my respect and admiration. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:35, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:25, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:12, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Grind24 (talk) 23:02, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matiia (talk) 23:48, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Begoon (talk) 06:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Joe Watzmo (talk) 19:32, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Jc37 (talk) 09:31, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Happy to continue supporting MBisanz; he has a long-established record of excellent work and trustworthiness. Acalamari 09:56, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - QuiteUnusual (talk) 10:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Reliable. --Vachovec1 (talk) 17:35, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:54, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 22:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Tremonist (talk) 16:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 17:01, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep All good. Elfix 09:41, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Enfcer (talk) 11:30, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. --Wiki13 talk 12:06, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep We absolutely must keep M. a steward even were he to do exactly, or asymptotically, nothing. For, suppose all the other stewards become mired in petty wikidramas, as Wikipedians are increasingly wont to do, and by doing so, end It, i.e. lose any and all capacity to effect effective stewardship? Never say never. It could come to pass. If so, we will then have someone above kept back in "arrears", ready to spring forth to rescue us from the unstewarded w:mire, liquidating any obstructions to That Which Anyone Can (but not May) Edit. --Mareklug (talk) 16:59, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep StudiesWorld (talk) 11:16, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Altamel (talk) 06:43, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 07:41, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:39, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 18:24, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep ///EuroCarGT 01:40, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Glaisher (talk) 16:17, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FiliP ██ 00:02, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Hope to see more activity on the other steward activity fields (except GR) --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 08:13, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepDefender (talk) 15:02, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Sidelight12 03:42, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Biosthmors (talk) 15:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I don't see a problem with focusing efforts on renaming during the process of the SUL finalisation as he's utilising his expertise and experience. As the workload reduces, I'm sure MBisanz will continue to undertake more of the other steward responsibilities. Thehelpfulone 00:49, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:26, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep No problem. --►Cekli829 13:52, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Wnme 15:34, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Ruy Pugliesi 17:47, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: it, en
  • Personal info: Hi, also this year I've given my little contribution to help in fighting cross-wiki vandalisms, spammers, spambots and with other Steward tasks. I'm happy to serve for another year the community as steward if the community will be glad to confirm me again. I'm also often reachable via IRC where I follow the steward's related channels and some wikimedia ones, where I can help users easily in their own requests. Thank you. --Melos (talk) 21:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments about Melos

edit


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en, mt, it-2
  • Personal info: Hi there. I'm usually 'passively' around (handling the more background tasks, and responding to requests particularly when no one is around - being a lover of the night helps). Besides watching the stream of unifications on IRC, I typically handle SRG, SRP, VR, and less often SRUC and SR/SUL. Ultimately, I'd be unable to objectively judge whether my level of activity is sufficient, or whether my actions are adequate - so I'll leave this for you to decide! :-) -- Mentifisto 05:15, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
    Note: just thought of adding here that, although I was aware that my activity levels had dropped off significantly, in comparison to previous years (although I thought I was around as active as last year, which was still not very active), the fact that I ended up being practically (though not completely) inactive passed me by, kind of... but there really isn't a reason I couldn't become active again the coming year, especially as I'm online constantly anyway (a matter of reserving time)... -- Mentifisto 19:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments about Mentifisto

edit
  • Remove Remove Very limited activity, only a single steward action this year and also not many more in the last year, does not make me feel very comfortable supporting another term of stewardship, Anyhow, I'd like to thank Mentifisto for his service during the past couple of years. Vogone (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Mentifisto's always been active and does great work as a steward, and I can't think of any reason why they shouldn't continue to be trusted as a steward. Snowolf How can I help? 18:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Very limited activity --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Avi (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Too limited activity. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove, per Vogone. Keep Keep, per this comment. Érico Wouters (msg) 02:14, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep sufficient activity for me. --Vituzzu (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Unfortunately, I don't see enough activity to keep the steward rights, with barely any actions for over 75% of the year (and especially only one action in January, when people usually realize their low activity in their statements and perform more actions). --Rschen7754 19:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
    (With regards to the latter, well, normally people dislike when it seems like something is done for a specific reason... but otherwise, one action is indeed little, but that's just this one month, when I had external problems... 75% would be about right, though, which baffles even me, as I virtually spend my life online... although, I guess, subjective activities do change.) -- Mentifisto 22:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
    • I am a bit concerned that less active stewards currently have more support for retaining their rights, and may revisit this before the end of confirmations. --Rschen7754 19:38, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove --Uğurkenttalk 19:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Eurodyne (talk) 19:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove - sorry, stewards should have some activity so one is able to evaluate their contribs. --Rax (talk) 20:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove not enough activity for this. --Enst38 (talk) 20:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove due to the very limited activity. Armbrust (talk) 22:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Weak keep Alan (talk) 22:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per Snowolf. Green Giant (talk) 22:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove--DangSunM (talk) 23:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, reasonable activity in my view — NickK (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Not very active, but I don't want he run a new steward election to get the bit back. He can not get steward flag immediately once he is active... I don't think semi-active steward is useless.--GZWDer (talk) 01:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 03:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Pundit (talk) 07:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove due to inactivity sadly --Herby talk thyme 09:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral inactive. Ajraddatz (talk) 09:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
    Change to neutral; has returned to activity, but I fear that it will just be during these confirmations. Hopefully you decide to stay around :) Ajraddatz (talk) 08:02, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Please be more active. Matanya (talk) 11:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I know of more inactive stewards and Mentifisto has been active throughout the whole year. Trijnsteltalk 13:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove, not active enough, unfortunately. --AmaryllisGardener talk 14:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep IW 16:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
    Remove Remove - Thanks for your service. Southparkfan 19:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - since you said you'll be more active, and people always deserve a second chance - changed my vote from remove to keep. Southparkfan 20:37, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral I'd really like to see an increase in steward and cross-wiki actions. --Az1568 (talk) 06:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep—with my respect and admiration. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:35, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Widr (talk) 13:53, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Matiia (talk) 23:56, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Not very active, but does it actually matter? He keeps himself updated with the latest developments of the Wikimedia projects and is still around to give his input. Elfix 14:29, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral JoshuaKGarner (talk) 19:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I don't think steward activity can be measured by the number of steward actions. --თოგო (D) 16:05, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove --Berlin-George (talk) 22:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep hopefully would be more active this year Mardetanha talk 12:52, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Nowhere near active enough. -Djsasso (talk) 16:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 22:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep weak keep - Does a good work and is experienced, however, it would be nice if you'd show some constant activity during the year. You don't have to be the most active steward, but some continuos activity would be great and not just around the time of the confirmations. As you say that you are online constantly, you should be able to show up constantly. Please use the chance! :) -Barras talk 12:42, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Tremonist (talk) 16:51, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep weak keep. What Barras said. A bit concerned with low activity. I also dislike the practice of being more active on confirmations for some reason.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 17:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
(I won't just be active in the confirmations... I just upped my levels and will remain consistent in the future...) -- Mentifisto 07:12, 21 February 2015 (UTC)


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: de-N, en-3, fr-1, tet-1, la-1, es-1
  • Personal info: Occasionally my real life causes bumps in my wiki (and so also in my steward) activites, as can be noticed in the various statistics of actions. However, I am still active and willing to continue as a steward. In my second year as a steward, I have mainly focussed on the processing of rights requests (on SRP, SRGP and SRB), the finishing of the 2013 round of the Admin activity review, and continued to be a member of the SWMT, vandal- & spam-fighting (global blocking & locking). I've also contributed to the drafting of the policies about global renaming and global renamers, which had to be created this year as thankfully global renaming was implemented.

Comments about MF-Warburg

edit


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: pl, en-4, ru-1, de-1
  • Personal info: Over the last year in the first half I was not very active as a steward. In the second half I've come back to life and have been normally active (partially, by encouragement from Matanya and other fellow stewards; partially because I've regained more time, hopefully for good), and overall I believe I've been engaged more than a year earlier. Most recently, I've been often the first one to deal with expiring rights. I hope to do more in the future. In particular, I want to increase my activity in global prevention. I delivered a talk at Wikimania in London and met a good number of great Wikipedians, as well as other stewards ;) Pundit (talk) 19:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments about Pundit

edit
  • Keep Keep Still okay. Vogone (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Pundit's activity level have never been high, but they've never been inactive and they've done some very good work over the years, especially behind the scenes. Snowolf How can I help? 18:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Avi (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Unfortunately he was inactive for most of the year, but he is still reachable and willing to give his input, and believes in collaboration, so I can't vote remove, but I can't fully support given activity levels. But, I still have a lot of respect for him as a person. --Rschen7754 19:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Uğurkenttalk 19:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Per Rschen. Eurodyne (talk) 19:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 21:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Armbrust (talk) 22:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Alan (talk) 22:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per Snowolf. Green Giant (talk) 22:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --DangSunM (talk) 23:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepNickK (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. MBisanz talk 00:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • keepDerHexer (Talk) 01:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Not very active (worse than Shizhao), but if he want to keep his right, he will do so.--GZWDer (talk) 01:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 03:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, though please be more involved in stewardy discussions :) Ajraddatz (talk) 09:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
    Thank you, and I will weigh in. Pundit (talk) 10:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matanya (talk) 11:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Though per Ajraddatz as I've always appreciated your input. :) Trijnsteltalk 13:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Southparkfan 19:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Alan ffm (talk) 00:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Az1568 (talk) 06:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Stanko (talk) 10:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Altamel (talk) 05:17, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Same as in 2012, 2013, and 2014. odder (talk) 13:04, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep—with my respect and admiration. I've come to know him well and his is an opinion that I trust, listen to, and respect. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:36, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Plogeo (talk) 18:59, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:28, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:13, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Widr (talk) 11:45, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Fairly active and sensible. Elfix 14:24, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Joe Watzmo (talk) 19:38, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Tremonist (talk) 16:52, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 17:08, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 17:26, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep StudiesWorld (talk) 11:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 08:12, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep ///EuroCarGT 02:01, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Glaisher (talk) 16:42, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FiliP ██ 00:03, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Sidelight12 (talk) 03:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepDefender (talk) 03:25, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Thehelpfulone 00:41, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep week keep Per Rschen7754--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 08:08, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep OK --►Cekli829 14:00, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Wnme 16:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Ruy Pugliesi 17:59, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: fr-N, en-3, de-1
  • Personal info: Being a steward since September 2011, I have worked mainly with steward requests and countervandalism/antispam. But my activity on Wikimedia projects slightly reduced last year. I decided to run the confirmations nevertheless, thinking that I could become more active in 2014. Unfortunately, acting as a steward requires to keep oneself always informed on policies updates and community events. Since I do not have the time anymore, I would like to resign from my steward position. I will be happy to come back to help again when I will have more time. Thank you for this rich experience and for the beautiful projects we are building together ! -- Quentinv57 (talk) 20:20, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments about Quentinv57

edit
  • Good luck and thanks for all your work in the past couple of years. Vogone (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbolic Keep Keep. Quentin has done great work over the years as a steward, both behinds the scenes and not, and when active they've done a tremendous amount of work. I take some comfort in their desire to come back when more time will be available, at which point they will certainly be welcomed back with open arms. Snowolf How can I help? 18:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Holmium (talk) 18:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep We need stewwy who do behind the scene job.--AldNonBicara? 18:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Avi (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks for all you've done! --Rschen7754 18:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Uğurkenttalk 19:29, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Sammyday (talk) 21:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 21:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Mjbmr (discussioncontribs) 21:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your service ~ Nahid Talk 21:47, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 21:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Armbrust (talk) 22:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Binabik (talk) 22:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Thanks Keep for Keep your Keep work. Alan (talk) 22:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Remy34 (talk) 22:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Thank you for your contributions to Wikimedia. Hopefully we will see you return soon. Green Giant (talk) 22:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you for all works that you serve:) --DangSunM (talk) 23:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Good work. MBisanz talk 00:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove --Guil2027 (talk) 00:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your service, hope to see you back again once! :-) —DerHexer (Talk) 01:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Thx! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • You may request a global renamer right.--GZWDer (talk) 01:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 03:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Pundit (talk) 07:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep White Master (es) 09:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep :( Ajraddatz (talk) 09:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your work! Matanya (talk) 11:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Sad to see you go, but it's understandable. Thanks for everything you've done. Trijnsteltalk 13:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Franck (talk) 18:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your service! Southparkfan 19:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Thank you, very, very much for your work! — Arkanosis 21:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Good luck and thank you. QuiteUnusual (talk) 10:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep sad to see you leave. MoiraMoira (talk) 11:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Symbolic Keep Keep. Jules78120 (talk) 21:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbolic Keep Keep. Thank you for your work. --AmaryllisGardener talk 02:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you Quentin! Bennylin 21:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Reychstan (talk) 12:07, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep—with my respect and admiration. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:36, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep in case you change your mind. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:29, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:13, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Grind24 (talk) 23:10, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep schlum =^.^= 13:10, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Thank you. Housterdam (talk) 12:04, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Litlok (talk) 21:29, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Quentinv57 has no recognition and legitimity on his mother wiki. Even more, he collaborated there with contributors who destabilized the projet during years. I don't understand why some contributors from wp:fr support him here. MrButler (talk) 23:23, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Bzh-99 (talk) 09:30, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove --Lebob (talk) 17:16, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove --Pixeltoo (talk) 02:00, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Cantons-de-l'Est (talk) 11:59, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --En passant (talk) 09:13, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Calak (talk) 09:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Tremonist (talk) 16:53, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your work!—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 17:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep If not possible, good luck, in whatever you will do; thanks a lot for your service. --Zyephyrus (talk) 17:37, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep StudiesWorld (talk) 11:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 08:14, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:40, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep ///EuroCarGT 01:41, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks for all your contributions! Good luck, Glaisher (talk) 16:44, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your service. --Harlock81 (talk) 23:17, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbolic Keep Keep. Thank you for your work. — Defender (talk) 15:15, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Zivax (talk) 18:50, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep It was great to work with you over the years, I hope to see you around! Thehelpfulone 00:35, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your contributions Quentinv57 :)--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 08:10, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep No problem. --►Cekli829 13:53, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Wnme 15:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Ruy Pugliesi 17:49, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Calak (talk) 05:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en, fr-2, es-1
  • Personal info: This is my second confirmation as I was elected in 2013. During the year I've been reasonably active in terms of logged actions and other unlogged work. I spend a lot of my time watching activity on some of the very small projects and then stamping out the occasional outbreaks of spam before they spread crosswiki. While this year I haven't been such a major contributor to the admin activity review as I was in 2013 due to a conflict with some real life activities (and a particularly busy time on my home project), I expect to take a major part in this year's review. I have a reasonable number of "global sysop actions" too. If confirmed, I would expect to continue at broadly the same level of activity throughout 2015, increasing when the 2015 activity review and SUL finalisation begin. On a final note, I have deliberately remained closely involved with my two home projects - en.wikipedia and en.wikibooks - as I believe it is important for all functionaries to continue to play a part in contributing content. QuiteUnusual (talk) 12:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments about QuiteUnusual

edit


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en, es-2
  • Personal info: I have moved into a new phase of life and am finding it hard to stay both active and engaged as a steward while still contributing content and remaining involved in the community. Therefore, I am not running for confirmation, and am resigning when the confirmation results are carried out in early March.

    At nearly 10 years from when I started editing, I plan to focus what time I have on content work on the English Wikipedia, building up the Wikidata community, and contributing to global and local policy discussions as time allows. I thank the community for their trust over this past year, and kindly ask for your support as I continue in a different role. --Rschen7754 06:53, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments about Rschen7754

edit
  • Thanks for all your work in the past year, especially with regards to AAR, and good luck in your future roles, whichever they might be. Vogone (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • +1 --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbolic Keep Keep. Rschen7754's work as a steward has been excellent, their dedication to AAR and their wise counsel on other matters will be sorely missed. I hope that at some point later in the future they consider becoming a steward again, as the Wikimedia community has greatly benefitted from their work in this position. Snowolf How can I help? 18:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • I think Keep Keep. Thank you, for you, is to help users as much as possible from him. --Uğurkenttalk 18:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your service. -- Avi (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Forced keep I won't let you go!--AldNonBicara? 18:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks!!! Alan (talk) 18:29, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment info He thought appropriate to take part into a local vote about a wheel war involving a fellow steward. However, he had taken part into similar local processes before.[10] --Nemo 18:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your service over the last year and all the best. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks. I appreciate your work and inspiration. Eurodyne (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Igor Windsor (talk) 22:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Thank you for your contributions and hopefully you will return to stewardship soon. Green Giant (talk) 22:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you for all works that you serve:) --DangSunM (talk) 23:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Sad to see you go. Thanks for making the man I am today, and for your service. :) --Atcovi (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • ok, remove (symbolic) - a strange tradition indeed - thanks for your service in the past! --Rax (talk) 00:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Your work, esp. in regards of AAR, was highly appreciated, sad to see you go. —DerHexer (Talk) 01:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Bye. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • You may request a global renamer right. Also GR and GS.--GZWDer (talk) 01:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 03:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Sidelight12 (talk) 04:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • You should be able to get GS as you were one of them before the SE2014. GRN will be good option too. — Revi 04:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Pundit (talk) 07:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your service. ~ Nahid Talk 08:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep White Master (es) 09:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your work over the last year. Keep :( Ajraddatz (talk) 09:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks for all your work! Matanya (talk) 11:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • You can't force people to stay, but when something doesn't feel right ... I've appreciated your help the past year & take care! Trijnsteltalk 13:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbolic Keep Keep, great steward. *sniffle* --AmaryllisGardener talk 14:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you for all your work. Southparkfan 19:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Thank you for your work! — Arkanosis 21:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • While I, as a close colleague of yours on the English Wikipedia and Wikidata, am glad that you are deciding to shift your focus toward those areas, I admire your work as a steward the past year and thank you for volunteering for the position, even if only for one year. TCN7JM 04:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep in case you change your mind. Thank you for your service! :( Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • thanks for all your work, good luck - QuiteUnusual (talk) 10:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Geagea (talk) 21:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove – rude and deliberately unhelpful hat-collector, who doesn't even know (or pretends not to know) the difference between a public rename and a sock[11], and so is obviously not qualified to be a steward (or checkuser, for that matter). ~ DanielTom (talk) 00:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
    Since he's resigning anyway, I think your comment is a bit rude. PiRSquared17 (talk) 01:51, 11 February 2015 (UTC) (modified comment)
    It was not my idea to make resigning stewards have to go through a "confirmation" discussion, but since we are having one and Rschen only plans to resign in March, and so many people are commenting "keep", it is only right that I also offer my sincere opinion on the user based on personal experience—I'm afraid you can't make me feel bad about it. ~ DanielTom (talk) 02:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Hmm, let's see, you're complaining about this steward's "rude" behavior at enwiki, and I don't see that at enwiki, but what I do see is that you're blocked indefinitely at enwiki. --AmaryllisGardener talk 03:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
At this time, I would like to thank those who left their regards on this page. I will be staying on an additional few days to help finish out Admin activity review/2014 and participate in the steward discussion on confirmations, but will not be performing other steward work from the time of this posting.
While I appreciate the suggestions to continue with other rights, I have decided that it would be best for me to focus both on the Wikimedia responsibilities that I am retaining, and on my outside life. If I find that I have more time in the future, I may return to some of the roles that I have had to step down from over the last year, or explore new roles.
A lot of people think that being a steward is the only way to have an impact on Wikimedia. But in truth, we all can have a positive impact by contributing to both the content (after all, that is what Wikimedia is all about) and to the health of the community (because we have to encourage people to contribute what they know). That is what I would like to encourage you with, as I depart from this role.
Thanks again, Rschen7754 17:42, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en-3, ru-N
  • Personal info: This is my fourth confirmation since my election in the February 2011. During the fourth year as a steward I kept approximately the same level of activity (at least I think so) as in the previous year, and I believe that I still remain useful to the the Wikimedia Community. I have been mainly making userrights and global rights changes and helping users to rename/merge their accounts as well as helping with local administrative tasks. I still have a lot of enthusiasm for this role and wish to continue to serve as a steward. I hope that the community will support me. Thank you.

Comments about Ruslik0

edit


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: es, nl, en-3, fr-1
  • Personal info:
    Dear Wikimedia Community,

    This past year has been my first as a steward and I would like to count on your support for another year. Being a steward isn't always easy, but I have tried to perform to the best of my ability. I have been active in numerous areas. I believe I have been useful, and would like to continue providing assistance in all areas I have been involved.

    My activity has, and I am aware, seen a dip in October and November, after seeing a strong reduction after the first few months. I am unable to maintain the amount of actions I performed in the first two months, but I believe my average activity over the remaining months is acceptable. I have a busy real life all year round, making achieving my personal standards for monthly activity impossible. Nevertheless, I believe that my overall activity has been sufficient to be a useful addition to the steward team.

    I would like to thank all users who provided valuable assistance, in particular the other stewards and the es.wiki checkuser team who helped me getting used to these rights. I would also like to thank you all for the feedback you provide.

    With kind regards,

    Savhñ 18:10, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments about Savh

edit


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: ta-N, en-3
  • Personal info: Hi everyone. This is my first confirmation as I was elected in 2014. I would like to continue as steward for one more year if the community agrees to it. I have been active in most of the steward activity fields in the past year as you can see here and there. Please feel free to ask questions/ provide feedback if you have any. Thanks for your consideration. Regards--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 17:00, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments about Shanmugamp7

edit
  • Keep Keep Ok. Vogone (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Shanmugamp7 has been an excellent and well-rounded addition to the steward team. Snowolf How can I help? 18:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Avi (talk) 18:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep thank you for yesterday helping handling LTA.--AldNonBicara? 18:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose Wheel warred with a local bureaucrat instead of opening a local discussion.[12] --Nemo 18:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep In regards to the Commons "wheel warring", this was at the mandate of the WMF. A case could easily have been made for Odder to have been emergency decratted for those reasons. But that's neither here nor there I guess. Otherwise I have never had any issues with their actions. --Rschen7754 18:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove due to absolute lack of trust and due to him having demonstrated absolute lack of judgement when he de-sysopped a Commons administrator after being explicitly told about my reinstatement of their admin privileges on IRC (the #wikimedia-stewards channel in particular). For what it's worth, @User:Rschen7754 should be aware that no case was made against me, and I was kept as a Commons bureaucrat as decided by the local community. odder (talk) 18:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Érico Wouters (msg) 19:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Uğurkenttalk 19:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Eurodyne (talk) 19:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Calak (talk) 21:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Armbrust (talk) 22:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral--DangSunM (talk) 23:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - the JurgenNL case was not this user's fault. Put blame where blame lies. Green Giant (talk) 23:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepNickK (talk) 23:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Atcovi (talk) 23:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • keep, I think he understood what had been a better solution in the commonswiki case. —DerHexer (Talk) 01:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per above. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep This, that and the other (talk) 01:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --GZWDer (talk) 01:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 03:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Shanmugamp only followed a direct order from the WMF, opposing him for that is like barking up the wrong tree..overall excellent steward especially in culling spambots cross-wiki ..--Stemoc 04:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Pundit (talk) 07:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose White Master (es) 09:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per Green Giant. Ajraddatz (talk) 09:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matanya (talk) 11:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep KTC (talk) 13:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Did a great job so no worries. Trijnsteltalk 13:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral - per Nemo. On the other hand, people deserve a second chance and I hope Shanmugamp7 learned from it. Southparkfan 19:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep INeverCry 06:18, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Of course! Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 11:45, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Tufor (talk) 13:48, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Az1568 (talk) 06:47, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Widr (talk) 11:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --AmaryllisGardener talk 17:48, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- with my respect and admiration. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:31, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matiia (talk) 18:22, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:14, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Grind24 (talk) 23:10, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Tremonist (talk) 16:55, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 17:14, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep All good, ok Elfix 09:44, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Enfcer (talk) 11:38, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep StudiesWorld (talk) 11:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 08:36, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:40, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep ///EuroCarGT 01:43, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Syum90 (talk) 14:34, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:06, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Glaisher (talk) 16:54, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:11, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FiliP ██ 00:04, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepDefender (talk) 16:55, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Sidelight12 03:35, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:31, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep No problem. --►Cekli829 13:54, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Wnme 15:39, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Ruy Pugliesi 17:49, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: zh-N, en-1, ru-1, ja-0
  • Personal info: This steward did not create their confirmation page before the start of the comment phase. Page created on behalf of the Election Committee by Snowolf

    Sorry, recently too busy :(, I forgot steward confirm time.

    I have been a steward since late 2005. In the past year, I processing requests in SRG and SRCU, block OP etc. I would like to continue to serve the wikimedia project community as a steward for 2014. Thank you for your past support.

    --Shizhao (talk) 12:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments about Shizhao

edit
  • Remove Remove No reconfirm statement, low activity level Universehk (talk) 03:16, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Unfortunately no reconfirm statement. Vogone (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral awaiting statement, although I have always felt that those who do not create their confirmation statement send a bad message, Shizhao has, to the best of my memory, always created their statements and so I think it best imo to wait and see what they have to say. Snowolf How can I help? 18:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Alan (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • No statement, and repeated use of OS on their homewiki. I did not find their explanations particularly satisfying, and they did it once again after that discussion. Given previous objections to their use of CU on their homewiki before, I don't see that we have any other option left. Remove Remove --Rschen7754 18:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove, inactive concerns. Thanks for your service! Érico Wouters (msg) 19:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral --Uğurkenttalk 19:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Eurodyne (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove - no statement --Rax (talk) 20:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove due to lack of reconfirmation statement. Armbrust (talk) 22:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove no statement--DangSunM (talk) 23:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep{{rm}} per no statement being created. Per statement and activity levels. Green Giant (talk) 23:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • {{neutral}} per Snowolf — NickK (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC) Keep Keep, ok, I see a statement, quite strange to see a user who was active and made steward actions but forgot about confirmation, but in my view the level of activity is ok for keeping steward rights — NickK (talk) 09:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Inactive, no confirm statement as well. --Atcovi (talk) 23:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • remove, unfortunately. —DerHexer (Talk) 01:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Good bye, sorry for my only oppose vote, 10 years is enough imo, and seems you have problems between you and Hong Kong people? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

*Neutral Neutral This user is more active than Jyothis, Mardetanha, Pundit, Ruslik0, Snowolf and others. but I will wait for your comment. Jusjih will become another steward speaking Chinese.--GZWDer (talk) 01:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep Keep ("Keep" added 10:10, 13 February 2015 (UTC)). Shizhao is our longest-serving steward, having first been elected in May 2005. I note that Shizhao has been active on this wiki and zhwiki as recently as 10 minutes ago, so I am surprised that they have not written a statement. However I suppose we have to take this fact as an intention to resign, which is quite unfortunate. This, that and the other (talk) 01:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral. No statement is surprising.Keep Keep Please write the statement on time next time. 下次请按时书写陈述。--Jusjih (talk) 03:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral as the intention is not clear, no doubts about engagement, skills, etc. though. Pundit (talk) 07:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose White Master (es) 09:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove due to inactivity sadly --Herby talk thyme 09:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove largely inactive. Ajraddatz (talk) 09:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove, inactive. Changing to Keep Keep. Please be more active. Matanya (talk) 11:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Since he make a comment, I decide to vote Keep Keep.--GZWDer (talk) 12:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I've always found Shizhao a hardworking user and I see it as a plus that he wishes to continue for the tenth year. Trijnsteltalk 13:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Long service and also a diligence steward. --minhhuy (talk) 13:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral - Southparkfan 19:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Not sure if those above voted Remove because there was initially no confirmation statement or because the user posted it late. If it's the latter then that's just being petty. Active and hard-working. Gets my approval.--Xania (talk) 00:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep INeverCry 06:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Geagea (talk) 21:10, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Az1568 (talk) 06:48, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep What! Are we going to be such formalists that we will fire a steward merely for failing to create a reconfirmation blurb?! ... I am disappointed. Tempodivalse [talk] 01:35, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Altamel (talk) 05:13, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- with my respect and admiration, even despite the failure in maintaining against red tape. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:31, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:32, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:15, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove per above Grind24 (talk) 23:13, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Inactivity. Widr (talk) 11:13, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
family wiki last edit last log (bureaucrat) last log (sysop) Local groups
mediawiki www.mediawiki.org 2014-10-23 15:36 autoreview
wikibooks zh.wikibooks.org 2014-12-16 02:26 2013-05-09 00:55 2015-01-04 01:40 bureaucrat, import, sysop
wiktionary zh.wiktionary.org 2015-01-16 02:18 2014-07-10 01:45 2014-11-26 01:29 bureaucrat, import, sysop, transwiki
wikiquote zh.wikiquote.org 2014-04-22 03:01 2013-05-09 00:56 2013-05-09 00:56 import
wikisource zh.wikisource.org 2015-01-26 02:05 2013-05-09 00:56 2013-05-09 00:56 import, sysop
wikipedia ru.wikipedia.org 2011-01-25 06:19 2012-04-16 06:11 uploader
wikipedia de.wikipedia.org 2014-04-10 03:24 editor
wikipedia fi.wikipedia.org 2005-03-04 11:18 autoreview

--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Remove Remove He „would like to continue to serve … as a steward for 2014“. It's a little bit late for that by now … Someone who takes that little interest in cooperating with the community in the first place that he does not care to create any confirmation statement at all and then presents this one-liner that has probably just been copied over from the last confirmation without even bothering to change the year does not earn my trust – neither personally nor technically. Sorry. Troubled @sset   Work    Talk    Mail   12:39, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral JoshuaKGarner (talk) 19:37, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep He is active enough. Kroji (talk) 20:40, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Tony Tan98 · talk 21:59, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove I'm not convinced that he ever understood that (and why) acting on one's homewiki as a steward is very problematic. --თოგო (D) 16:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Inactivity. --Berlin-George (talk) 22:45, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Thanks for your contributions. Please focus more on your local wikis in your limited time.--Lt2818 (talk) 14:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Most serious vandal in zhwp. Baycrest (talk) 09:38, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral --Tremonist (talk) 16:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Weak remove. I'm not really happy with !voting for removal, but I expect stewards to have a better understanding of their own fundamental policies and to be able to learn with mistakes. Shizhao is here for sometime and I still see misuse of steward's tools in homewiki, despite same problems in the past. I also would like to see any participation on discussions. Thanks for your work anyway.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 17:24, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Unprepared for confirmation. StudiesWorld (talk) 11:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 08:37, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, activity is somewhat low but acceptable.--E8xE8 (talk) 11:40, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:45, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, trusted member. - Mailer Diablo (talk) 18:24, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral ///EuroCarGT 01:52, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Obviously, it's neither appropriate nor necessary to keep this problematic sysop. He already abused the power granted by Wikimedia and made lots of troubles in the past years. He has been recalled by zhwiki community for 7 times! Is there any other administrator of any wiki project breaking his record? He was accused of violating policies and guidelines, plagiarizing, distorting when translating, ever creating many accounts, wrongly revert repeatedly, deleting articles or files without neutrality (or not avoiding conflicts of interests), controversial blocks, political screening, using bots beyond consensus and authorization, lack of communication, threatening to leak privacy of other users from meta access which cause serious safety concerns, etc. Some even believe his account is not only controlled by himself. How come he can stay in the position? Voters deserved to know important information concerning these legitimate doubts. Wish the problem cannot be solved in zhwiki can be reviewed, discussed, and solved by the global community this time!--ChrishrursdssPDK (talk) 07:12, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
    • You are not qualified to vote.--Antigng (talk) 08:42, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
      • For me, this vote sounds very qualified - not allowed to vote is different to not qualified! Marcus Cyron (talk) 09:01, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
      • Please note this section is called "Comments about Shizhao". I do not believe any account is prohibited to comment on a different user's work. Whether a comment is taken into account for the reconfirmation process is an entirely different question. Vogone (talk) 20:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
        • Indeed, eligibilty criteria for steward elections do not apply to confirmations. Any comment by anyone is welcomed. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:57, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
          • Why eligible accounts cannot vote No here? Or why qualified editors cannot have accounts to vote No here? Because unjust and excessive retaliation was or will be the consequence (it's not difficult to provide "reasons" to kick you out by certain zhwiki sysop). When power highly concentrates, when a steward and some other administrators with different power and access actually form a clan, like Communist party, not a few editors with contribution , different opinions and moderate or minor mistakes already forced to leave forever (some are clearly not necessary) while some even more rogue users who "correctly" follow the power stay happily. Sadly, it's the real situation in zhwiki recent years. It could be worse and worse if without attention or intervention from international participants and the Wikimedia Foundation. How many confirm him really know what kind of editor he is? I just see reluctant colleagues mobilized, power followers, and who saw things may not that important for an open system and Wiki's goal. There are issues much more critical than personal convenience. Almost 10 years is long enough, especially when there is no high approval rating for this controversial account. Remove the burden and make user with special power accountable is healthy for the development and reputation of Wikimedia.--ChrishrursdssPDK (talk) 06:51, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Fine by me. Trusted user and very experienced. Glaisher (talk) 16:56, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:18, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Sidelight12 03:26, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove per inappropriate use of global lock 2 weeks ago on an account and without providing any rationale to justify the use. OhanaUnitedTalk page 02:14, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Strong POV in exercising his administrative power in zhwiki, and proven to be an unpopular administrator, and already had seven polls on revoking his administrative power.--Leeyc0 (talk) 04:00, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Inactivity at here, Often against POV at Chinese wikipedia.Tvb10data (talk) 04:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Power abuser. I think he should go back and reflect on what he had done in the past, and once he better understands his role, maybe we can have him back. Ernestnywang (talk) 05:13, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove He should put more affect in order to maintain his stewardship.—An Macanese 07:38, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
    • A lot users are canvassed to come here. [13][14][15]--GZWDer (talk) 09:44, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
      • Thanks for that reminder but I have to state that I only found that "canvass message" in the history of my talk page. It was deleted before I noticed there was an edit on my talk page.Merci —An Macanese 17:34, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove-Tim仔 (talk) 12:15, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en, it
  • Personal info: Hello, I'm Snowolf. This is my third confirmation, as I was elected in the 2012 elections. While my activity levels are not as high as they once were due to other obligations outside Wikimedia, I believe I still can be a net positive for the projects. I remain highly available on IRC and try to pickup the requests that fall thru the cracks and I to help as much as I can with open requests on-wiki, especially in the European night time. I have been privileged to be part of the steward team for some time and work with (and argue with, at times) such a wonderful group of people, and I would love to continue carrying on as Steward if the community still deems me worthy of their trust.

Comments about Snowolf

edit
  • Remove Remove The mark has now been a bit overstepped, at some point enough is enough. Not only was Snowolf an instrumental member of the last year's ElectCom which unjustly revoked Jusjih's steward access, but also treated other users, mainly on IRC, in a quite disrespectful manner while criticising other user's involvement and actions whenever possible without contributing much with regards to solving the underlying problems himself. My confidence in him as a steward has clearly suffered and I hope said confidence may recover someday, but for now I cannot support another term of stewardship, sorry. Vogone (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep trusted --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep While I may not always agree with him, I think that Snowolf is one of the best stewards we have. He is extremely active, he is responsible, and, in my experience, he neither acts without reason nor is unwilling to engage in discussion and consensus. In my opinion, Wikimedia projects as a whole greatly benefit from his being a steward and would lose out should he not be confirmed. -- Avi (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 19:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Érico Wouters (msg) 19:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • This is a hard one for me. For years I have always found their comments insightful, if at times a little blunt. However, over recent months I have been dismayed and uncomfortable at their manner of interacting with other stewards; I feel that in their quest to be always "right" they have forgotten that we are a collaborative project. The global renamers debacle was one such instance [16]; while enwiki doesn't govern Meta, I would expect stewards to know better than to disrupt a process to prove a point and engage in filibustering, and in the follow-up conversation some of their explanations brought up even more concerns, though I will let them speak about that if they wish.

    But on reflection, they did most of the work in setting up the election, and the balance of my interactions with them have been positive, and I generally agree with most of their opinions so Neutral Neutral because I can't support, but I don't really want to remove either. I'm really sorry about this. --Rschen7754 19:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Uğurkenttalk 19:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - trusted --Rax (talk) 20:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Per Vogone. Eurodyne (talk) 20:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Aplasia (talk) 20:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 21:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Armbrust (talk) 22:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Green Giant (talk) 23:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepNickK (talk) 23:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Per Vogone's reasoning. --Atcovi (talk) 23:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Good work. MBisanz talk 00:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • remove Snowolf and Barras have shown impossible behaviour in the first election of global renamers and disappointed me a lot by doing this. Even if the Wikimedia Foundation has given us only a short time frame to organize these elections, all stewards and bureaucrats were invited to discuss on the mailinglists and talk pages the proposed policies and procedures which have been prepared by some stewards. Instead if doing so or raising their concerns on the very same, designated discussion places during the elections, they blatantly opposed the innocent candidates whose user rights we steward have taken over without any compensation, suddenly coming out of nowhere, and who we invited to help us with global renames, sharing knowledge, spreading the workload, etc. By doing this, they did not only do harm to the candidates themselves without any valid reason and confused them, they also harmed the steward by making them look like users who either cannot find consensus or accept it (besides disrespectfully trampling on the preparation work or their fellow colleagues). Briefly, I do not expect from a steward to troll elections simply for making a point. That's what I do not understand as collegial behaviour and worthy of stewards. As far as I remember, they did not apologize for this childish behaviour yet which is inacceptable as well and baffles me. —DerHexer (Talk) 01:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
    I am disappointed to hear you thought my actions were childish. I assure you they were undertaken with the greatest misgivings and sadness, and were done in good faith. I hardly relished the thought of doing so, and did so only to allow the community to properly review the procedure with the extra 24 hours given by my oppose and I struck my votes the moment people were actively discussing the policy. I genuinely attempted to minimize the disruption of my actions as disrupting the process was not my goal, and I have never done anything like this in 7 years as a Wikimedian, and will not do so again in the future. That my actions were found objectionable by people whose experience and judgement I profoundly trust was quite humbling and lead to a lot of soul-searching. This is an episode which will never happen again and I certainly regret the issues it caused. Snowolf How can I help? 01:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Please do not remove per above. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Not very active (worse than Shizhao), but if he want to keep his right, he will do so.--GZWDer (talk) 01:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 03:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove - makes mistakes, which are understandable, especially if the person was fed a one sided story. But it is a person's responsibility to comment on the project which action is taken on. If you can take action, you can comment on it, and not just on meta. Ignored requests for comment to be displayed. Sidelight12 (talk) 03:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral (S)he is active and good steward, but this log and his comment contradicts, as "I have done so now", but it wasn't and eventually got removed by Trijnstel. CUOS things are really powerful thing that he should not make that kind of mistakes. — Revi 04:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I do not condone the global renamers protest, but I understand that it was done in good faith, plus the comment from Snowolf above. Pundit (talk) 07:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Lepido (talk) 08:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Herby talk thyme 09:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep Keep - Rschen7754 raises concerns that I agree with, however overall I think that Snowolf does good work as a steward. Ajraddatz (talk) 10:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matanya (talk) 11:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Syum90 (talk) 12:02, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep KTC (talk) 13:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep No one is perfect, so Snowolf isn't either. But I've always added much value to his opinion and would like him to stay. Trijnsteltalk 13:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral --AmaryllisGardener talk 14:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep - although I've had a few disagreements with Snowolf, he is usually very helpful and responsive. I wasn't very active around the time of the global renamer incident above, but frankly, I agree with Snowolf that 24 hours is not enough time for people to comment on Meta rights requests. Meta requests should follow the Meta:Snowball policy which forbids "snowball" closures, because Meta has very few users who comment on most discussions, and they can't be expected to see everything within 24 hours. That having been said, the POINTy actions were unnecessary, and I can understand why the 24 hour period was introduced (because the renamers would essentially be regaining their rights). PiRSquared17 (talk) 20:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepArkanosis 21:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep for me Snowolf is a a "troubleshooter", hence the fast action.--AldNonymousBicara? 02:10, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 11:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove - M. E. nicht geeignet. --ST 23:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep agree with PiRSquared17 (first sentence). ~ DanielTom (talk) 00:50, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Abd (talk) 02:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Az1568 (talk) 06:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Mainly per PiRSquared17. I can see why some would find the style of engagement uncomfortable at times (although personally I don't) but if ever there was a case to apply net positive it is here. Snowolf is clearly deeply concerned with making sure the right thing is done, thinks carefully and their thoughts are always wise and valuable. QuiteUnusual (talk) 11:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Widr (talk) 12:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Mjbmr (discussioncontribs) 06:42, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep – Excellent steward. Tony (talk) 09:41, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- with my respect and admiration. Hard working, with excellent judgment and an ever-pleasant disposition. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:32, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matiia (talk) 18:24, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:15, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I don't see why it will be the opposite because he knew how to really take care of steward's tasks, and I agree with PiRSquared Grind24 (talk) 22:18, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove He is definitely not the Snowolf i knew years back..somethings changed..--Stemoc 06:01, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Kind and competent steward. --Andyrom75 (talk) 17:39, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove IMO some their action on IRC were supporting one party in a conflict situation, while more neutrality is expected from a steward. I no longer trust them. Ankry (talk) 19:52, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Begoon (talk) 06:12, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Pracchia-78 (talk) 14:37, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I think it's better to have a helpful and experienced steward, despite of that sometimes unsuitable tone towards other users, than not having him. --თოგო (D) 16:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Wikiklaas (talk) 13:18, 17 February 2015 (UTC) - Personal experience: most friendly, helpful and knowledgeable steward when it comes to assisting good-faith users.
  • Keep Keep --Irwin Dime 02:36, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove, Conny (talk) 15:38, 19 February 2015 (UTC).
  • Keep Keep --Doc.mari (talk) 18:17, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - A great steward I really enjoyed working with in the past years on many different areas! -Barras talk 12:32, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Tremonist (talk) 16:57, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 17:25, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Sarah (SV) talk 05:36, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Sensible steward. All good. Elfix 09:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Enfcer (talk) 11:40, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 08:49, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep StudiesWorld (talk) 11:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:50, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep BethNaught (talk) 13:35, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove [17] Frakir (talk) 19:30, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Definitely. ///EuroCarGT 02:03, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Glaisher (talk) 16:59, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:12, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Harlock81 (talk) 23:13, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FiliP ██ 00:05, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Biosthmors (talk) 15:29, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Of course Thehelpfulone 01:06, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Ruy Pugliesi 17:57, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepDefender (talk) 18:00, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: nl-N, en-3, fr-2, de-2
  • Personal info: This is my first confirmation as steward since I was elected last year. As I said back then, I realise I am not as active as I used to be, but that I would be happy to help out when I can and that I planned to become more active. Unfortunately I never manage to be as active as I would like to be in Wikimedia. Additionally it's not always easy to keep up with all developments, both on Meta and in other Wikimedia projects. Anyway, I usually prefer to stay on the safe side and only help out e.g. when requested or with maintenance tasks. For example I also made the global group names consistent and updated a right that was deprecated for a long time but nobody apparently noticed. If the community is okay with me as a rather "supporting" steward helping out here and there, that's great; but if the community feels that stewards should really be more active and involved in that role, I'd understand.

Comments about SPQRobin

edit
  • Keep Keep Clueful steward who helped a lot with the technical side of global groups, and fixed their names, which was long overdue. Furthermore, also available on IRC to help with requests there. Vogone (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Alan (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 19:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Uğurkenttalk 19:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Eurodyne (talk) 20:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Armbrust (talk) 22:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per Vogone--DangSunM (talk) 23:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Green Giant (talk) 23:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Gloria Vogone brings a convincing argument. --MF-W 23:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepNickK (talk) 23:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral --Atcovi (talk) 23:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Good work. MBisanz talk 00:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • keep as per Vogone. —DerHexer (Talk) 01:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Not very active (worse than Shizhao), but if he want to keep his right, he will do so.--GZWDer (talk) 01:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove - Less than 100 actions since March last year..--Stemoc 02:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 03:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Thank you for your service, keep it up. Mjbmr (discussioncontribs) 04:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Pundit (talk) 07:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 10:02, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matanya (talk) 11:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Not that active - didn't expect otherwise when I voted for him, but still - so please become more active this year. Trijnsteltalk 13:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --AmaryllisGardener talk 14:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. -Mh7kJ (talk) 17:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Southparkfan 19:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Avi (talk) 20:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, please — Arkanosis 21:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Brackenheim (talk) 00:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep
    Danny B. 02:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral I fear that he is going to be mostly inactive next term, but he is a great person to work with and I've never had issues with their work, so I can't vote to remove. --Rschen7754 03:10, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 11:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Az1568 (talk) 06:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Widr (talk) 12:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- with my respect and admiration. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:33, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:15, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Grind24 (talk) 22:11, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Of course, as a King, I would like to see my Count keep reigning...--AldNonymousBicara? 10:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Tremonist (talk) 16:57, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 17:25, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Appears to be mostly okay. Elfix 09:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Enfcer (talk) 11:41, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 08:51, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep StudiesWorld (talk) 11:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:44, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 23:14, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep ///EuroCarGT 01:51, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Glaisher (talk) 16:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FiliP ██ 00:04, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepDefender (talk) 17:31, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Sidelight12 03:27, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep No concerns --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 12:44, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep OK --►Cekli829 13:57, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Wnme 15:55, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Ruy Pugliesi 17:52, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: sv, en-3
  • Personal info: I have been a Steward for three year now so this is my third confirmation. My activity this year has been similar to previous years with a lot of spam-bots and cross-wiki vandalism which can be seen in this graph. I can often be found on IRC for dealing with emergencies. With your support I would like to continue for another year. -- Tegel (Talk) 18:09, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments about Tegel

edit


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: pt, en-3, es-2
  • Personal info: Hi, everyone. Thanks for participating. I am confirming my interest on keep helping as a Steward this year. I hope everyone are ok with what I have done in the past. Otherwise, criticism will also be much appreciated. I know I am being repetitive, but it has been a pleasure to be part of this awesome team. Best wishes for those who will participate on the upcoming elections. Regards.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 01:17, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments about Teles

edit


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
  • Personal info: I am a steward since October 2011 and am active ever since. While I do pretty much every steward task, I'm mostly active with cross-wiki vandalism and sockpuppetry as can also be seen in this nice graph. I expected to have less time by now, but that's clearly not the case and I am still able to combine the various other roles too so I would like to continue for one more year - if I have your support of course. As always, I'm reachable by all means. Trijnsteltalk 11:36, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments about Trijnstel

edit
  • Keep Keep Ok. Vogone (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Trijnstel's is incredibly active and does an excellent job. Snowolf How can I help? 18:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Per Snowolf -- Avi (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep We keep nice guy around.--AldNonBicara? 18:29, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Yes! Alan (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, no concerns. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Even at 3+ years of being a steward, she is conscientious and humble, not "settling" for doing an okay job but striving for excellence and encouraging others to do the same. --Rschen7754 18:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. LlamaAl (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Very active. --Uğurkenttalk 19:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Linedwell@frwiki (talk) 19:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove I am sorry for her, but I have lost my confidence in this user. On the Dutch Wikipedia I found her biased and unhelpful. The Geo (talk) 20:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Eurodyne (talk) 20:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - no doubt --Rax (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Yes, please. --Enst38 (talk) 20:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Very active, good job. –Ejs-80 21:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Neukoln (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Mjbmr (discussioncontribs) 21:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 21:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Igor Windsor (talk) 22:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Armbrust (talk) 22:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Why not--DangSunM (talk) 23:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Green Giant (talk) 23:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, great work — NickK (talk) 23:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, helpful and kind steward. --Atcovi (talk) 23:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Good work. MBisanz talk 00:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. One of the better stewards, hard worker and very active....--Stemoc 01:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • keepDerHexer (Talk) 01:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--GZWDer (talk) 01:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 03:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Active and highly experienced. INeverCry 04:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Pundit (talk) 07:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep sure, easily reachable. ~ Nahid Talk 08:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Sehr gerne --Itti (talk) 08:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep White Master (es) 09:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep no comments. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Herby talk thyme 09:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 10:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matanya (talk) 12:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep KTC (talk) 13:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Wahrerwattwurm (talk) 14:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --AmaryllisGardener talk 14:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, Bernard (talk) 15:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral because of comment of user The Geo above. Otto ter Haar (talk) 15:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep IW 16:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Sure. Southparkfan 19:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, please — Arkanosis 21:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -jkb- 22:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep The friendliest, most-helpful and the best steward.--Xania (talk) 00:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepDanny B. 02:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral I am sorry, but also Trijnstel seems to have a distorted mind on what should be done and what not. Banning an active user from a IRC channel and not responding to any mails about it is immature and the user should therefore not be having steward tools. Also, member of a certain clique which one should not be happy to be in. Clique forming is a huge no. I might have overreacted here. Trijnstel does good work, but a break could be a smart move. Changing to neutral. — TBloemink talk 10:22, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --DirkVE (talk) 11:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - integrity and compassion galore and dares to act. MoiraMoira (talk) 11:16, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - basically to neutralize TBloemink's vote, which is clearly made out of revenge. Edoderoo (talk) 11:28, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep very helpful, doing great job Tufor (talk) 13:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, good impressions.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:10, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Geagea (talk) 21:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Shivanarayana (talk) 23:18, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Az1568 (talk) 06:50, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep No-brainer, one of the most active ones. Widr (talk) 11:47, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep—with my respect and admiration. Trij is absolutely of the best judgment, and is an absolute delight to work with, even when we disagree. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:33, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - QuiteUnusual (talk) 13:50, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matiia (talk) 18:25, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Of course Grind24 (talk) 22:03, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Ciell (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep A valuable asset who is always willing to help. Elfix 14:57, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral JoshuaKGarner (talk) 19:39, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Hadrianus (talk) 22:34, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. WJBscribe (talk) 00:46, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Litlok (talk) 21:29, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, very active and friendly in the mailing list.--Kegns 14:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Wikiklaas (talk) 13:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC) - just for the recordkeep
  • Keep Keep --Vachovec1 (talk) 17:38, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Irwin Dime 02:40, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - A really great steward, who does a lot for the community. -Barras talk 12:31, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Tremonist (talk) 16:58, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 17:26, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - I've seen some good work, keep ik up! Iooryz (talk) 17:18, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Enfcer (talk) 11:46, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Nolispanmo (talk) 09:10, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Of course... -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 08:53, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep StudiesWorld (talk) 11:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep while we can have differences of opinions/approach at time, her opinions are always worth listening. An absolute treasure.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:53, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 18:24, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Definitely. ///EuroCarGT 02:03, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:34, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Glaisher (talk) 17:04, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FiliP ██ 00:05, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Sidelight12 (talk) 03:00, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepDefender (talk) 03:30, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Who doesn't love Trijnstel? :) Thehelpfulone 00:43, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:38, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep No concerns --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 12:43, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep OK --►Cekli829 14:01, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Wnme 16:59, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Ruy Pugliesi 17:57, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: it, scn, en-2, fr-1
  • Personal info: I haven't been active for some months because of a series of factors. Above all I'm fully-booked (and I'll be till the end of February) so I choose to avoid doing actions (like stewies' ones) implying an accountability level I wasn't able to guarantee. Being busy gave me an opportunity to take a break after the worst thing ever happened in my wiki-world (the death of Alessio/Cotton, one of my mentors when I was a newbie).

    Setting apart from some recurring issues (lack of a path to solve problems involing whole a project above all) I still enjoy the role and, above all, the team. I mean to be back to my usual level of activity at the beginning of March so I ask the Wikimedia community to confirm me. Ciao!

    PS: I'm very happy to see MarcoAurelio and Herbythyme back. --Vituzzu (talk) 14:46, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments about Vituzzu

edit
  • Keep Keep Vituzzu has always been an active and competent steward and he has been missed in the last couple of months, and it is great to have him back. Snowolf How can I help? 18:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Kartoffeln. Vogone (talk) 18:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove, 'cause I don't trust him. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 18:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, no concerns. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Avi (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep As he has been active at most other times, I'm sure he will be active soon. --Rschen7754 18:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Euphydryas (msg) 18:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Shivanarayana (talk) 19:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Uğurkenttalk 19:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Érico Wouters (msg) 19:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Eumolpo (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Eurodyne (talk) 20:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Aplasia (talk) 20:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Please do it further. --Enst38 (talk) 20:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Igor Windsor (talk) 22:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Armbrust (talk) 22:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --DangSunM (talk) 23:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Green Giant (talk) 23:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepNickK (talk) 23:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Can be hostile at moments. --Atcovi (talk) 23:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Good work. MBisanz talk 00:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove, No longer active and has barely done anything since October last year, Wikimedia needs active stewards..--Stemoc 01:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • keepDerHexer (Talk) 01:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Please be more active this year.--GZWDer (talk) 01:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 03:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep See you in March. INeverCry 04:02, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep need more activity from trusted stewards. Sidelight12 (talk) 04:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Pundit (talk) 07:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Lepido (talk) 08:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Herby talk thyme 09:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 10:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matanya (talk) 12:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Nastoshka (talk) 13:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Happy to see you're back. Missed you the past months. :) Trijnsteltalk 13:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --AmaryllisGardener talk 14:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, Bernard (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep IW 16:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Pracchia-78 (talk) 19:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Southparkfan 19:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Nungalpiriggal (talk) 20:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, please — Arkanosis 21:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -jkb- 22:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove for fishing.
    Danny B. 02:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
    It wasn't "fishing" at all, it took me about three clicks on "check" to find the owner of the sockpuppet you're dealing with. --Vituzzu (talk) 13:22, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 11:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Tufor (talk) 13:48, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Gobbler (talk) 20:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC) Vituzzu, you cannot be missed! Please come back soon! We need you
  • Keep Keep --Az1568 (talk) 06:50, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Widr (talk) 13:24, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep—with my respect and admiration. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:33, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:34, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - QuiteUnusual (talk) 11:47, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Matiia (talk) 18:25, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Grind24 (talk) 23:13, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Superfranz83 (talk) 00:40, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Definitely Keep Keep—A part in the last period (for legitimate persol reasons), he's always present and willing to help. --Andyrom75 (talk) 17:37, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove – Per my rational last year. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 13:40, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Joe Watzmo (talk) 19:36, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Deletion of fair criticism to the misbehavior of admins in the Spanish Wikipedia (where such criticism cannot be published) is definitely not out of scope. I can't trust his good judgement and what seems to be a symptom of badly understood esprit de corps (especially considering that, as he openly declares, he can read Spanish only at a basic level). --Discasto (talk) 13:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove There is a kind of a harmful subculture of transgression among stewards and checkusers, consisting of management always on the edge, just barely possible, hopefully violating the maximum possible of user privacy. The members of this subculture permanently defend each other. I don't trust them. Mar del Sur (talk) 20:28, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Doc.mari (talk) 18:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Manu Lop (talk) 21:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - I'm certainly happy that you are back now! -Barras talk 12:24, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Irwin Dime 14:04, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Tremonist (talk) 16:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 17:27, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Because I trust him. Elfix 10:00, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I am willing to extend an Assume Good Faith w:olive branch to Vito, despite our tiff that followed my editing activity within a humor page on meta—which was also jocular, innocuous, and on topic, other Poles notwithstanding for lack of (under)standing, if you know what I mean, resulting in exponential cross-wiki drama, a real-life ironic instantiation of the deadly true wisdom encapsulated as m:How to deal with Poles. --Mareklug (talk) 16:26, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 08:54, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep StudiesWorld (talk) 11:28, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:41, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep ///EuroCarGT 01:43, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Glaisher (talk) 17:05, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Harlock81 (talk) 23:10, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FiliP ██ 00:05, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep es:Magister Mathematicae 03:59, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepDefender (talk) 17:22, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep.--AldNonymousBicara? 17:23, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:30, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Zivax (talk) 18:52, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Thehelpfulone 00:36, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --►Cekli829 13:54, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Pyprilescu (talk) 14:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Wnme 15:42, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Ruy Pugliesi 17:50, 28 February 2015 (UTC)


[se links: unrecognized page title.]

<se2015 statements page not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages:
  • Personal info: This steward did not create their confirmation page before the start of the comment phase. Page created on behalf of the Election Committee by Snowolf

    Hi, although late, but I believe I have very good reason for that. I had real emergency in my personal life which came just a about a week ago before the confirmation. Previously I talked to my fellow steward colleagues and thought briefly about seeking reconfirmation or stepping down. I thought a lot and made up my mind.

    I have been a steward for quite a while now. Truth be told, I was mostly inactive during last year. I was stuck with my real life (not this present emergency I am dealing with) issues and could not find enough time to be active as a steward. But I have always missed it and I hope to be active this year as I look for more stability in my personal life. Nevertheless I cannot guarantee future but I have decided to seek confirmation for at least once more so I can have this one chance to continue my work as a steward. I believe I have still the trust of the community (and my account was never compromised during the inactivity level) so it will allow me to give me a chance to continue for another year. I hope you will understand.

    So it is up to you fine people. I will be friendly and active whether or not I pass this confirmation. It's just a matter of finding scope which I hope I will find in this coming year. Thank you.

    — T. 18:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments about Wikitanvir

edit
  • Remove Remove Unfortunately no reconfirm statement. Thanks for your past service! Vogone (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove no reconfirm statement --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Alan (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove per above. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Unfortunately, it seems that Wikitanvir has moved on. Remove, with thanks for their work. --Rschen7754 18:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
    • Now that there is a statement, I would prefer that Wikitanvir returns to a greater level of activity first and runs again in the future. --Rschen7754 19:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral none against but it seems he cannot longer be active. --Vituzzu (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Long time is not active. --Uğurkenttalk 19:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove. Érico Wouters (msg) 19:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Eurodyne (talk) 22:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove per Rschen remove, with thanks for your work.--Enst38 (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove per above--DangSunM (talk) 23:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per Rschen. Thank you for your contributions and hopefully we will see more from you soon. On second thought. Green Giant (talk) 23:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral, statement about his activity is not really convincing although I have nothing against his work — NickK (talk) 23:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove --Atcovi (talk) 23:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Moral keep Nah, it's fine, don't sacrifice your IRL for wikis too much. In the end it's your own life, not us, it's your own decision and I am sure you will take the best course of action for your own well being, be well and farewell Wikitanvir.--AldNonBicara? 00:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • remove sadly due to the policy. :-( —DerHexer (Talk) 01:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral His statement makes me problematic. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove was quite active before but only one action since March last year..alas ..--Stemoc 01:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Although stewards policy says any steward inactive (as a steward) will have their steward permissions removed and inactive means with steward actions amounting to zero for the past 6 months and less than 10 in the last year, I don't think inactive steward will harm Wikimedia. I will not vote remove until we can elect stewards any time or stewards removed due to inactivity may be restored without further discussion as long as there are no issues.--GZWDer (talk) 02:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Moral keep. Please write the statement on time.--Jusjih (talk) 03:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Moral keep Pundit (talk) 07:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose White Master (es) 09:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep :(. Maybe run again next year if you have more time? Ajraddatz (talk) 10:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I'm willing to give you two, three, four chances. But please take them this time, if others are willing to give it too. Trijnsteltalk 13:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral - I'd like to hear from you soon if you already know if you will become active again or that the IRL issues just don't make it possible. Southparkfan 19:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Considering there has been a valid reason why no statement page was created, I am ready to give Wikitanvir one more chance to get more active. His past absence has been a noticable loss already. Vogone (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 20:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, per Aldnonymous, Ajraddatz, Trijnstel and Vogone — Arkanosis 21:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep A confirmation statement is a statement whether it's by the due date or not.--Xania (talk) 00:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 11:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Az1568 (talk) 06:50, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Inactivity. Widr (talk) 19:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Baffled that something as menial as not creating a reconfirmation statement can cause such consternation ... Bureaucracy at its finest. Tempodivalse [talk] 01:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- with my respect and admiration. I respect his judgment, and I've come to consider him a friend. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 13:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:35, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Wants to keep the steward rights just to have them, while explicitly refusing the slightest commitment to the community and the duties that come with that position. Sorry. Troubled @sset   Work    Talk    Mail   12:43, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep JoshuaKGarner (talk) 19:44, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove per the inactivity policy. Mike VTalk 21:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep as per Trijnstel's and Vogone's comments above. --თოგო (D) 16:19, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove --Berlin-George (talk) 23:01, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Moral keep Rcsprinter123 (talk) 00:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral --Tremonist (talk) 16:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Tanvir is always friendly, capable and willing to help in so many ways. It is sad to see that real life is taking your time, but I am sure you are following a good path. Please, return with more activity this year if you can. It is also fine if you don't and I am sure you will keep helping WMF projects somehow. Thanks.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 17:31, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
  • I've mostly no problems with stewards with little activity (using the Steward tools is not a duty or a responsibility and the number of users with these tools is not limited, AFAIK). The problem is when they start pulling away and getting out of touch with the projects (missing about new policies, tools, etc.) and then cannot at least give well-thought inputs on the current issues. I'm mostly okay with Tanvir staying for another year, but I would like to see him more often in the Stewards' internal discussions. Keep Keep Elfix 10:12, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 08:56, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove No statement StudiesWorld (talk) 11:26, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral With other responsibilities in WMF world and ill family, you would think that is enough on one's plate, periods of inactivity are okay, though are not the purpose of the tools  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:47, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral ///EuroCarGT 01:55, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Thanks for all your contributions to Wikimedia! Glaisher (talk) 17:08, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per Elfix --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Sidelight12 03:23, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - IAR if we need to! Thehelpfulone 00:46, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 12:35, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Tanvir is honest, skilled and trustworthy. I hope he takes into consideration this new chance people are willing to give him and makes a come back in the coming term. Ruy Pugliesi 17:51, 28 February 2015 (UTC)