Stewards/Confirm/2017

Translate this page at Template:Steward confirmations.

The 2017 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

The 2017-18 Confirmation will begin on 8 February, and will finish on 28 February.

The 2017-18 Steward Confirmations are an opportunity for the Wikimedia community to comment on the performance of existing stewards. To make the process as smooth as possible, the confirmations are organized as follows.

To comment, please log in with an account that has edits (on any wiki) before 8 February. During the 2017 Elections, please mention if you are comfortable or unhappy with the use of steward tools of any of the people listed below and why.

After the election, stewards (including the newly-elected ones) are invited to review the confirmation comments and to give their impression of the outcome (consensus to confirm/remove etc.) on Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2017 for every steward who stood for confirmation. Of course, they are not required to do this for every candidate and will be especially careful to do it regarding someone about whom they expressed strong opinions in the confirmation. Non-steward comments are welcome outside of the "Final Decision" section, subject to the usual expectations of civility. Confirmation discussions will last one week after the appointment of the newly elected stewards. This may be extended to two weeks for one or more confirmations at the discretion of the Election Committee if the committee believes further input is required before concluding. The Election Committee will close these discussions and implement the outcome (which also means making a decision in non-obvious cases).

All stewards elected before February 2017 will undergo this process.

Ajraddatz

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en-N, fr-1
Personal info: Hello everyone. I've been a steward for three years now, and with your permission I would like to continue in that role for another year. I've maintained a reasonable level of activity since being elected, and you can view a breakdown of my activity this year at this page. Most of my work in this role deals with responding to cross-wiki abuse, assigning local permissions through Meta-Wiki, and participating in discussions with the group as a whole. If confirmed, I will continue to be active in these areas. Outside of the steward role, I am still an active member of the Wikidata community, and I occasionally write some articles on the English Wikipedia. As always, if you have any questions, I would be glad to answer them. Thanks, – Ajraddatz (talk) 07:18, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Ajraddatz

Keep Highly active through the entire year and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 14:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good. --Vogone (talk) 14:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted, experienced & active. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 14:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hardworking and experienced steward. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active, helpfull, no issues.—Ah3kal (talk) 14:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good steward. No concerns. --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep, good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Murma174 (talk) 15:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Yeza (talk) 15:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :D — regards, Revi 15:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Juandev (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Always willing to help when needed. Actions are reasonable, cool and levelheaded. Cameron11598 (talk) 17:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Back to work you go, sorry... –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hardworking steward... Chansey (talk) 17:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no concerns. Linedwell (talk) 19:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 19:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep StevenJ81 (talk) 20:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 21:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - no objection --Rax (talk) 21:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MechQuester (talk) 22:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bjarlin (talk) 22:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC) EDIT: I will still keep my support because [I think] voting "Remove" for something as small as this is quite ridiculous, but please make sure to read local policies before removing a user's sysop/'crat rights next time. Thanks --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 12:02, 16 February 2017 (UTC) cleared up by Ajraddatz --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 20:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted and well qualified. TheGeneralUser (talk) 23:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. no concerns. Iazyges (talk) 00:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — xaosflux ^Talk 00:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Thanks for your work on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 00:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Eager Lin (Message) 01:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
~~Remove for~~ failure to assume good faith. [1] Saying "Threatening to mass-oppose steward confirmations" is not assuming good faith. Commenting in annual stewards' confirmation does not necessarily mean opposition. Neutral opinion is possible.--Jusjih (talk) 04:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Jusjih: What would you call this? [2][3][4][5][6] --Rs chen 7754 04:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - These are occasional objections within overwhelming supports, but unexplained calls to remove is not convincing. Marshallsumter's calls to remove stewards just for Wikiversity activities is also no good to me.--Jusjih (talk) 04:03, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - Keep as changing my thought.--Jusjih (talk) 19:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Geagea (talk) 06:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 08:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 10:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns and highly active. --Pokéfan95 (talk) 12:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, highly active and very helpful — NickK (talk) 13:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Udo T. (talk) 14:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 14:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. Very active, competent and experienced steward. Also a very nice user :-) Syum90 (talk) 18:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--CreativeC38 (talk) 19:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Samuele2002 (talk) 19:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Stang 01:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove no confidence. Slowking4 (talk) 02:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 08:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 16:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ankry (talk) 09:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK for one more year. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:33, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:06, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Coffins (talk) 18:20, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:19, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —MisterSynergy (talk) 22:46, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Howan Hansi (talk) 08:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 10:46, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep clearly competent, available and performing — billinghurst sDrewth 11:55, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 19:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:12, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Ping08 (talk) 20:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 08:48, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:32, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --YaganZ (talk) 10:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Richardkiwi (talk) 14:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Plagiat (talk) 20:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 01:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --JustBerry (talk) 06:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--AryanSogd ^(t) 17:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 21:57, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 06:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep --AFBorchert (talk) 10:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep doing a fine job. Lepricavark (talk) 18:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 21:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep TyA (talk) 04:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Calak (talk) 05:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 10:00, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matěj Suchánek (talk) 20:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep TJH2018 talk 22:17, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:50, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --İncelemeelemani (talk) 12:29, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Itay17 (talk) 12:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hanay (talk) 12:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Itti (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove no confidence. It does not solve the problems of the community--Шухрат Саъдиев (talk) 13:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Is there anything in particular you are referring to? Edit: it seems that he is referring to this, where I referred him to SRCU so that the request could be handled in a neutral location. My advice there still stands, though I commented again to clarify. – Ajraddatz (talk) 20:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
We are talking just solution of the voting procedure Administrator User: Jaloliddin Madaminov, which ruled User: Ajraddatz 19.01.2017.

See: the procedure of voting at the Administrator User: Jaloliddin Madaminov. https://tg.wiktionary.org/ Violation of the voting of the administrator Dagir99 and User: Fight M users registered 12.01.2017 and 13.01.2017??? No answer to this question from Ajraddatz? See Дархост ба унвони мудир/Jaloliddin Madaminov--Шухрат Саъдиев (talk) 08:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and there are two other users from that wiki (including one of the accused) arguing that the checks shouldn't happen. I don't want to be drawn into a local conflict; please file a request on m:SRCU, present your evidence, and then either myself or another steward will handle it. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:50, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See the results m:SRCU Steward requests/Checkuser and make a decision on the problem. If not Stewards then who will protect against vandalism?--Шухрат Саъдиев (talk) 05:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like it's been handled now. I'll comment there as well. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very active and helpful. Kurtis (talk) 20:10, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly active in all the areas and one of the nice steward :)--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 03:51, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 09:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 21:37, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and helpful--Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 17:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Reliable and hardworking steward. Thanks for your efforts! RadiX ∞ 20:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Mifter (talk) 01:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Excellent steward, no issues. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 02:06, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Excellent work during the past year, as always. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure, I've heard only good things about Ajr and I can confirm :) ~ Nahid ^Talk 10:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, very valuable addition. Sa vh ^ñ 10:40, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Avraham

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en, he-2
Personal info: As per previous years, I would like to express my gratitude for the community's continued trust in my contributions, and I would like to continue in this role for the upcoming year. While not the most active steward, I believe I contribute value in almost all steward areas, especially in discussions and decisions which may not always be visible on-wiki due to privacy issues. While I have reduced my Wikimedia-wide activities this past year (having voluntarily relinquished Oversight on the Commons) I think that the experience I bring from various janitorial positions across the projects will continue to help the corpus of Stewards in the coming year. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 16:30, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Avraham

Keep Active enough (barely) and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 14:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove 11/12 months with less than 5 steward actions and 4/12 months with 0 actions do not leave much of a basis for prolonged access. Little visible use of access has been criticised by many in the past years as well and now claiming to have reduced Wikimedia-wide activity even more does not look promising at all. Anyway, thanks for the past valuable service. --Vogone (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no reason to remove. --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep, good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone...--Ste moc 14:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No minimum requirement for activity, and their work has been good. Miniapolis 14:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The user has not been active in the last time, even so, I do not see any inconveniences to remain steward. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I agree with Vogone. --Gce (talk) 16:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone, whats the point of having the tools if you aren't using them to help the community? Cameron11598 (talk) 17:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Great editor, but like those above I am concerned about the lack of activity. -FASTILY 19:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Does important work behind the scenes; a wise head when wise heads are needed. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per many years of experience —DoRD talk 21:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - no objection --Rax (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone --DCB (talk) 21:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 21:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone. MechQuester (talk) 22:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Not active enough for my standards. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bjarlin (talk) 23:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC) ok, per StevenJ81 and DoRD, and because not everything he does is visible (OS)[reply]
Remove Not active enough. Iazyges (talk) 00:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Not active on Wikiversity since 2008! --Marshallsumter (talk) 00:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove:per Vogone--Eager Lin (Message) 01:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Geagea (talk) 06:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -- O.Koslowski (talk) 07:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I am prepared to believe him when he says that he "contribute[s] value in ... discussions and decisions which may not always be visible on-wiki due to privacy issues". Counting "steward actions" (which I assume refers to actions recorded in logs) would miss these types of contributions to private discussions among stewards. This, that and the other (talk) 09:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, while he is not the most active steward, he seems to have the right experience and make good contributions to the functioning of stewards as a group. I don't see any problems with him keeping the rights — NickK (talk) 13:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Leon saudanha (talk) 14:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Chansey (talk) 21:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove – completely agree with Vogone – KPFC 💬 21:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 09:06, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Klaas `Z4␟` V: 16:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Avi provides good thoughts and knowledge to the steward group. While not the most active steward I'd very much regret loosing his advices and work. —Marco Aurelio 21:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Krd 11:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Samuele2002 (talk) 11:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove It seems that you don't really need the tools... --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:06, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:20, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Howan Hansi (talk) 08:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Logged actions are not the only meter of someone's activity. User is eminently sensible, so why not? Craig Franklin (talk) 11:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep competent, and based on other's stewards favourable comments; could do more visible work to maintain confidence of the community (I did equivocate) — billinghurst sDrewth 11:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Archenzo (talk) 16:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Really too little use of the steward tools. Global renames can be done with Global rename rights only. And I don't agree with the argument about his contributions "behind the scenes". I didn't remember anything interesting from the past year, so I now searched my mail archive, and sorry to say, but I found no valauble contributions to difficult "discussions and decisions". --MF-W 17:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still neutral on this for now, but I don't think that Avraham is very active in our internal discussions. He has made it to a couple of the calls, but there is almost no activity on the list - especially on the difficult cases where his input could really be valuable. – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:05, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @MF-Warburg and Ajraddatz: Avraham has no global rename rights. If he loses steward rights, then he can't rename anyone anymore. Besides that, he also used the steward rights for 2 CU cases in April ("second opinion") and in Decembre and did a lot of other right changes (see Special:Log/rights/Avraham) which he all can't do anymore without steward rights. Then other stewards certainly have to do more. I don't see a logical reason for that, if he does things well, and there is noone doubting that. I don't see another reason for removing here but only "inactivity", but he's not that inactive. --Bjarlin (talk) 13:45, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - As I said, I'm neutral on this request. I generally don't agree with inactivity as a valid rationale for removal, without some indication that such inactivity is causing errors. Or if the person is totally not here anymore. – Ajraddatz (talk) 19:38, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Gridditsch (talk) 08:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Richardkiwi (talk) 14:53, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Plagiat (talk) 19:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove as no demonstrated need for the right. Feel free to reapply if you decide to become more active. --JustBerry (talk) 07:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--AryanSogd ^(t) 17:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove No reason to hang onto this mostly unused hat. Widr (talk) 21:04, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Per Ajraddatz and MF-W their comments. I trust their judgement regarding inactivity behind the scenes. Natuur12 (talk) 22:03, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per DoRD, Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 06:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep --AFBorchert (talk) 10:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep removing the right from a trusted individual who is still occasionally active doesn't seem beneficial. Lepricavark (talk) 18:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Per Marco.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 21:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hardenacke (talk) 14:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:50, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - While not the most active steward of the bunch, Avi is among the most thoughtful and level-headed (but you guys are all great, don't get me wrong!). He's highly experienced in dealing with difficult and sensitive issues related to Wikimedia projects, and can be relied upon to provide a voice of reason when needed most. I agree that we shouldn't keep inactive stewards around indefinitely, but Avi is still present enough to be useful. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Alan ^(talk) 19:19, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Around on IRC to help out with issues. They've been helpful to me in many situations, most not related to steward stuff, but still there nonetheless. Net positive. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eraevsky (обс.) 10:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 20:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I trust Abraham and so I chose to keep it אני סומך על אברהם ולכן בחרתי לשמור אותו Itay17 (talk) 12:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep. Ultraexactzz ^Talk 16:13, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Slicha (Sorry) Ofek j (talk) 18:30, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While not the most active steward, Avraham does enough to justify keeping him on, in my opinion. Kurtis (talk) 20:13, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Agremon (talk) 20:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per Ajr. --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 04:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per MF-W --rxy (talk) 09:58, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 21:38, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per MF-W. Nemo 15:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove My choice is unfortunately negative because it is not as enough active as. --Uğurkent^talk 18:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Experienced steward with sound judgement; definitely brings expertise to the team. I hope you will become more active this time though. RadiX ∞ 20:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - No concerns, experienced and overall a quality steward. I personally am not overly concerned about the activity level as Avraham's judgment is sound and in my estimation it cannot hurt to have more qualified stewards (the work has to be done by someone, why not spread the burden as much as possible.) Mifter (talk) 01:55, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I believe his presence as a steward will be a net positive for the team. While his activity is low, that should be possible to fix, and there were no issues with his actions pointed out. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 02:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While Avraham's activity levels are never particularly high, I've always noticed that he brings a different perspective to most steward issues, and is an excellent "bridgebuilder" in thorny situations. I see that some stewards above have noted that there's been little input from Avi behind the scenes, which is a pity and I hope you can take part more in the future! Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Encouraging a volunteer to work more cannot be done by kicking him. Also, every good action done for the community is a good action that helps others to do more good actions. --.js^{[democracy needed]} 13:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Barras

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: de, en
Personal info: Hello all! It's been a great time since I've been made a steward back in 2011. I've since then been usually around. In the past year, I suffered from serious health issues from which I currently try to recover. That is the reason why I was not really active in the last term. I'm currently not sure how much my activity levels will rise. I already dropped a few rights in November last year and I guess it's simply about time to also drop my steward rights. I really enjoyed the time and I'd certainly love to keep my rights, but I'm currently not really helpful and have no clue when I will be able to return to some more stable activity. After thinking a long time about it, I decided to not seek confirmation this year. I will, however, try to stick around. -Barras talk 13:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Barras

Thank you for your service! --Rs chen 7754 14:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
+1. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your past service and best wishes for your health. --Vogone (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
thank you and good luck--Shivanarayana (talk) 14:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work and take care! Stryn (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A net loss for the team. --Vituzzu (talk) 14:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service. --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep, good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A sad loss but thanks for the work --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your work! —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service. —Ah3kal (talk) 15:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for your service, and my very best wishes. Miniapolis 15:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to hear about this. :( Best of luck in the future, Barras. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry to hear that. Get well soon. Thanks for your service, too. — regards, Revi 15:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep schade und danke --Bjarlin (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Try to stay active as you can, and good luck. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
as far as I can see you did a great job on wikimedia projects, thanks for all your time and great commitment! And personally: hope you will recover soon, best wishes --Rax (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. MechQuester (talk) 22:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service and we will keep you as you wish. ツ Fylbecatulous talk 23:52, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not active on Wikiversity since 2012. --Marshallsumter (talk) 00:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your work.--Eager Lin (Message) 01:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep thank you for your good work. Sad to see you decided to stop. MoiraMoira (talk) 09:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for your service, Barras, and please accept my best wishes for the future. — TBloemink _talk 13:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your good work. Get well and hope to see you back soon — NickK (talk) 13:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
thanx dude --Nolispanmo (talk) 14:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dear fellow you have been an excellent steward, thank you very much for your service. I hope you will return to stewardship soon, and I really wish you improve your health. Hugs.--Syum90 (talk) 18:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Redlinux (talk) 19:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Woodwalker_talk 02:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep thanks for your work and good luck. --——d—n—f (talk) 07:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service. – KPFC 💬 12:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 16:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It was a pleasure to work with you and I'm sorry to see you go. Please get well soon. —Marco Aurelio 21:44, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service and wonderful work, get well soon and see you around! --Hydriz (talk) 06:15, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thank you for your work. --Samuele2002 (talk) 11:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --MannMaus (talk) 14:17, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all the job done and good luck for the future. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sad to see you go, it has been an honor to serve with you. Thanks for all your work. Matanya (talk) 18:07, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Coffins (talk) 18:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Gute Besserung dann. :S --თოგო ^(D) 21:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please get well soon Barras!--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 21:23, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks and best wishes! -- Andreas Werle (talk) 07:48, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Howan Hansi (talk) 08:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you and get well soon. --Jbergner (talk) 08:46, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much for your service and good luck! -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, enjoy RL with less commitments — billinghurst sDrewth 12:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Druddigon (talk | contributions) 12:39, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ich weiß, Du möchtest nicht, aber nimm dieses Keep einfach als Bestätigung der bisherigen Arbeit unsd als Danke! --Grüße vom Sänger ♫^(Reden) 16:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geolina163 (talk) 23:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --1971markus (talk) 23:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for the work you have done as a steward over the years, and all the insightful comments on steward related discussions. You'll be missed. I hope you come back sometime in the near future. RadiX ∞ 02:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work, it's highly appreciated. Get well soon! --Millbart (talk) 07:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Schade, großes Danke! --Gridditsch (talk) 08:51, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für Deine Tätigkeiten. Gute Gesundung. --Commander-pirx (talk) 09:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Codc (talk) 10:05, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work – and best of luck with your recovery. /Julle (talk) 16:11, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pittimann (talk) 17:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! get well and come back --Plagiat (talk) 19:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --JustBerry (talk) 06:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lautaro 97 (talk) 17:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep best wishes for your health --Elmie (talk) 17:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work and I hope you come back as soon as possible --Melos (talk) 19:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all the hard work done during these years. Érico (talk) 19:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the great time on serving the community.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 21:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Calak (talk) 05:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry to see you're leaving, I wish you could be kept. --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 02:36, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:51, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --S. F. B. Morse (talk) 05:04, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work, and good wishes for the future. All of us on Simple WP will miss your good sense. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:07, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --İncelemeelemani (talk) 12:29, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Barras!!!! Alan ^(talk) 19:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your service. Based on our prior interactions, I would have chosen to Keep you around for as long as you wanted the job. Etamni | ✉ 07:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: we will miss you! --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Danke für deine Arbeit und gute Besserung --Itti (talk) 21:24, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all your hard work, hope you make a full and swift recovery. Kurtis (talk) 02:32, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work as steward, hope to see you around :)--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 04:16, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your service. --rxy (talk) 09:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for all your work. Quiddity (talk) 21:40, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for all your work :-). Matiia (talk) 16:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your efforts. I hope everything will be good for you. --Uğurkent^talk 18:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good work. Taivo (talk) 07:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for years of hard work and dedication. Don't you dare disappear though! Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much for your service all those years. I'm confident that you’ll be up to your old tricks again in no time! ~ Nahid ^Talk 10:24, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for everything you did, and I hope to still see you around. Sa vh ^ñ 10:39, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your work! --.js^{[democracy needed]} 13:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bennylin

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: id, en, jv, zh-3
Personal info: Hello again all, and Happy Chinese New Year! I'm here to ask for your support for another year of stewardship. I'm mostly working with blocking spambots, and also sometimes requests via IRC every now and then need immediate response. Also I've started helping with steward's tickets starting last year. In 2017, there will be some major changes in my personal life, but I'm still aiming to be more active month-per-month basis from last year. Thank you. ✒ Bennylin 11:45, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Bennylin

Remove Sigh. I've always found Bennylin to be a nice guy, and I have never had an issue with his countervandalism/LTA work. However, over the last few years he has gone through long periods of inactivity. That in itself is not grounds to remove a steward considering the activity when he is active. But, I have noticed numerous errors in his handling of user rights requests, even multiple within a 24 hour period, showing that Bennylin is not up to date on current steward practices. If inactivity results in this, it is a serious issue. Regretfully, I have to vote remove, because if someone has to be continually checking over his work in this area, they might as well do it themselves. Issues as follows: not realizing that most bureaucrats cannot remove sysop, again two months later, [7], granting IP block exemption on a wiki with local admins, asking a user to canvass for a local adminship request, removing rights that an administrator can remove based on an OTRS ticket and IRC. Similar mistakes have been going on since back when I was a steward. --Rs chen 7754 14:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep, good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Pretty much inactive for over 3 and a half years now...Stewardship is not permanent.--Ste moc 14:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral He has not been quite active, though I think he can continue to serve as steward. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Concerns with limited activity. -FASTILY 19:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 20:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - checked the reasons given by Rschen #1 --Rax (talk) 21:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - stewardship is not for the inactive users. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Rschen. Iazyges (talk) 00:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Not active on Wikiversity since 2012! --Marshallsumter (talk) 00:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Concerns that inactivity is compromizing his practice. Per Rschen7754. —Ah3kal (talk) 03:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, generally per Rschen7754. I am also concerned by a significant number of mistakes made by this user. Two points are particularly concerning: firstly, sending users who want to resign to local crats who cannot remove rights, secondly, removal of various Danny B. rights in cswiki (AFAIK there is a long conflict in Czech wikis involving among others this user, thus one should have been extremely cautious regarding such requests). In addition I see a logical problem in this: Bennylin does not remove sysop rights on plwiki because it has local crats but removes autopatroller rights on cswiki even though it has local crats and many local sysops who can remove those — NickK (talk) 14:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 15:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--CreativeC38 (talk) 19:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Klaas `Z4␟` V: 16:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I hate this, but Rschen7754 sums up pretty much my thoughts sadly. —Marco Aurelio 21:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Krd 11:42, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'm not able to really make my mind... --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:43, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral On one hand Rschen7754 comments above are really concerning, on the other hand, i think you can do better. If you stay on the role, please improve in the areas pointed above. Matanya (talk) 18:09, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove everyone can make mistakes, but one should learn from them and not just repeat them. --თოგო ^(D) 21:24, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:37, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove unfortunately these are similar words from other confirmations, though unrealised following confirmation. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:05, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Samuele2002 (talk) 13:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - I'm usually unconcerned with a few mistakes, but the frequency and level of these is concerning to me. These are all basic errors which should not be made. – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Pnapora (talk) 22:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Gridditsch (talk) 08:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jerrykim306 (talk) 13:59, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Plagiat (talk) 19:16, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactivity linked to errors in handling tasks. --JustBerry (talk) 07:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove gave him the benefit of the doubt last year regarding activity but he remained inactive. Natuur12 (talk) 22:04, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
* Neutral --Elmie (talk) 17:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per concerns cited by Rschen7754. Lepricavark (talk) 18:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Melos (talk) 19:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove @xqt 13:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --cyrfaw (talk) 08:51, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Alan ^(talk) 19:22, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove The diffs in the first remove comment are compelling. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:22, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Glad to say goodbye with you. --Meracritus (talk) 17:40, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minoo (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Without prejudice towards him running for re-election in a year's time. Bennylin just seems to be a bit out of touch lately, per Rschen7754. Kurtis (talk) 02:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Matanya. Quiddity (talk) 21:45, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --MGChecker (talk) 23:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral: the majority of the actions/comments mentioned in the first !vote don't feel abusive/dangerous to me, but I'd need to check logs and contributions better before supporting. Nemo 15:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per negative opinions --Uğurkent^talk 18:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral masti <talk> 22:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Bennylin brings and has brought much valuable language expertise to the steward team, however the instances brought up by Rschen seem to indicate a pattern that is quite worrisome. We all make mistakes, and that's entirely fine. However, when mistakes are repeated and when post-incident handling is subpar, it's hard to support continued steward status. This is especially the case as no attempt has been made in this forum to respond to these concerns or propose ways to avoid repeating them :( Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bsadowski1

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: …
Personal info: I have been a steward for over 6 years now and have had many good experiences with the current/past stewards and would like to continue to do so. Although I haven't been active as I used to be, I am still around to deal with people who use the wiki to vandalize, spam, and the other kinds of abuse. I look forward to working with the current and future stewards this year.

Comments about Bsadowski1

Keep Still active and fighting LTAs. --Rs chen 7754 14:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good. --Vogone (talk) 14:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep, good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Uses the tools wisely, cool and level headed. Competent. Cameron11598 (talk) 17:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Active, trusted, and always helpful. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and pleasant steward, as usual. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 19:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 20:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep StevenJ81 (talk) 20:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 21:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Not active on Wikiversity since 2013! --Marshallsumter (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no issues.—Ah3kal (talk) 03:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 10:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 11:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for your continued service! — TBloemink _talk 13:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good work, helpful in fighting long-term abuse — NickK (talk) 14:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 15:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 16:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Okay. —Marco Aurelio 21:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted and active. — Ping08 (talk) 08:11, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:42, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I don't find you're very active on the cross-wiki activity. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:48, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:10, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 21:24, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- not active in Wikiversity. Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:39, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep we all need a cute dashboard toy :-p — billinghurst sDrewth 12:06, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Druddigon (talk | contributions) 12:37, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Samuele2002 (talk) 13:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Archenzo (talk) 16:12, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. — regards, Revi 14:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:13, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good work. --Palnatoke (talk) 21:06, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 08:53, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:32, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Plagiat (talk) 20:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --JustBerry (talk) 06:57, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 21:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 22:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lepricavark (talk) 18:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 21:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep TJH2018 talk 22:19, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:51, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --İncelemeelemani (talk) 12:34, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 19:23, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Etamni | ✉ 07:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep vandalizm is a major peoblem Hanay (talk) 12:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eraevsky (обс.) 11:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kurtis (talk) 02:32, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Trusted and experienced. Kelvin (talk) 09:06, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Geoide (talk) 14:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 10:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 21:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 18:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Solid anti-vandal work. RadiX ∞ 20:03, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Mifter (talk) 01:57, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Active and clueful as always. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 02:13, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Great work as always, no concerns :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:35, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure, Experienced and good work. ~ Nahid ^Talk 10:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, valuable addition. Sa vh ^ñ 10:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DerHexer

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1
Personal info: It feels a bit strange to look at Stewards and realize that you are now the oldest still active steward since M7 left close to his tenth anniversary. Although I usually only have little free time left after mostly very long working days (at Wikimedia Deutschland), I still try to be as present as possible as a steward, be it onwiki or in chats, and try to help wherever I can (for example, once again in the Election Committee). In particular that means to be available on IRC (also to restart bots which I co-maintain on ToolLabs), on the mailing lists, and on OTRS or Skype, where users who were affected by some of my global range blocks ask for support. Most of these blocks are caused by a long-term troll that I've grown to handle well, which also explains my high and constant activity on loginwiki and the huge amount of accounts I've locked.
Unfortunately, I'm not as active anymore in cross-wiki vandal fighting on smaller wikis or handling global rename requests (in fact, I stopped the latter after I spent much time helping to establish it), but I'm still happy that the SUL finalization, realized collaboratively with the Wikimedia Foundation, continues to make new tools possible and our work more effective. My good connection to the Wikimedia Foundation is, so I like to think, in many ways quite valuable to the steward group. Therefore I try to attend as many monthly calls with the Foundation as possible, where I contribute my experience, mainly on the topic of global bans with which I became quite experienced in the last couple of months. Some of the banned users also directly attacked me and have even denounced me to my former employee. I find it highly important that we convey very clearly, that vandalism and personal attacks are unacceptable. I also gave a presentation on that topic at the German WikiCon (German slides), as well as a presentation introducing metawiki to the broader German community (German slides), as I also understand the steward role as a bridge between the local and global communities.
I want to continue serving to the same extent, helping my dear fellows as well as my local community with global matters, and would be very glad to celebrate my tenth anniversary as a steward this December. Thanks for your patience, and please feel free to ask questions.

Comments about DerHexer

Keep Active enough and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 14:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good. --Vogone (talk) 14:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted and active. – KPFC 💬 14:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 14:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good work, although i have to admit that i am not happy about his activity level lately (compared to other years). --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've looked into the monthly stats: 1'220 actions are listed (#8, 3.63 % of all steward actions), for the second half of 2016 it is 571 actions (#10, 3.49 % of all steward actions). That does not look like a significant drop to me. In fact, I'm even #6 and #7 in global auth and global block actions. Of course, it's not 2007 anymore where only three stewards did almost all stuff and I was one of them. But still being in the top third of the most active stewards should be acceptable, imho. —DerHexer (Talk) 23:18, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep, good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/Pearli (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yarl (talk) 14:52, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ganímedes (talk) 14:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Murma174 (talk) 15:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove – Giftpflanze 15:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Altkatholik62 (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC) Experience matters. Btw I've never seen him actually hex anyone, only doing helpful charms.[reply]
Keep even against his will. Valuable, experienced and active enough.—Ah3kal (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course! – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep surely --Bjarlin (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Who if not him. EddieGP (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 20:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ra'ike (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rlbberlin (talk) 19:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 19:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep StevenJ81 (talk) 20:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gereon K. (talk) 20:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 21:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - active, experienced, trusted --Rax (talk) 22:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- MechQuester (talk) 22:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
~~Remove~~!! :P Just Kidding: Keep him!He is like a pillar for the entire WMF community. - εΔ ω 22:52, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Keep --Wuselig (talk) 22:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Not active on Wikiversity since 2015! --Marshallsumter (talk) 00:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Marshallsumter: Unfortunately, that is not correct. According to the tools, I edited a Wikiversity project the last time in 2016. Fortunately, there are more Wikiversity projects than the English one. Best, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think Marshallsumter is right, "crossactivity" shows no Wikiversity edits to any project after 2015. The two Wikiversities listed are merely global renames, no edits. --Vogone (talk) 11:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Moving pages is an activity. He was not talking about content contributions. ;-) —DerHexer (Talk) 12:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand at all what has editing a Wikiversity wiki to do with steward rights. But moving pages and global renames have much more to do with steward rights than editing there. That reason (on all these pages here) doesn't make any sense to me. Why shall it be better, if a steward who shall do steward actions in one of the Wikiversities has been active there not very long before than if he hasn't been? --Bjarlin (talk) 12:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Manter, trusted user. Alex Pereira ^falaê 01:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep:OK, not bad.--Eager Lin (Message) 01:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Geagea (talk) 06:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep PawełMM (talk) 07:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Freddy2001 ^talk 09:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 10:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Udo T. (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, of course. Very friendly and always helpful — NickK (talk) 14:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nolispanmo (talk) 14:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Linedwell (talk) 14:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 15:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Redlinux (talk) 19:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bubo 容 19:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Didi43 (talk) 20:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Chansey (talk) 21:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. — Ping08 (talk) 01:01, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Woodwalker_talk 02:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Maximilian Schönherr (talk) 07:33, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --——d—n—f (talk) 07:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gunslinger 07:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep und Danke für deine Hilfe im wiktionary.de Susann Schweden (talk) 12:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep old soldiers should never die Klaas `Z4␟` V: 16:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. —Marco Aurelio 21:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Emptywords (talk) 22:33, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:43, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Samuele2002 (talk) 12:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – oh yes. Tony (talk) 13:43, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --MannMaus (talk) 14:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, very good work. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:54, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:10, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Coffins (talk) 18:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Cirdan (talk) 19:00, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:26, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —MisterSynergy (talk) 22:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Brainswiffer (talk) 06:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Andreas Werle (talk) 07:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Howan Hansi (talk) 08:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jbergner (talk) 08:37, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --MEW (talk) 08:39, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Exoport (talk) 09:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —‏הגות‎⁴¹⁴ 09:37, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eschenmoser (talk) 10:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep +Botulph (talk) 10:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gripweed (talk) 11:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Squasher (talk) 11:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Enzian44 (talk) 11:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep competent and suitably active — billinghurst sDrewth 12:07, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --1971markus (talk) 12:14, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good. Hasive • talk • 12:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Samuele2002 (talk) 13:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pankoken (talk) 13:57, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Why not? — regards, Revi 14:36, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stefan64 (talk) 14:49, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Archenzo (talk) 16:14, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, aber sowas von... --Grüße vom Sänger ♫^(Reden) 16:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --WolfgangRieger (talk) 17:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jivee Blau (talk) 17:57, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --S.Didam (talk) 19:16, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 19:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Clemensfranz (talk) 19:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:15, 12 February 2017 (UTC) guess he's a keeper[reply]
Keep Good work. --Palnatoke (talk) 21:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 21:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geolina163 (talk) 23:36, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Baumfreund-FFM (talk) 05:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Millbart (talk) 07:15, 13 February 2017 (UTC) One of the most trustworthy users IMHO.[reply]
Keep of course. --Code (talk) 08:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 08:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kpisimon (talk) 09:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Commander-pirx (talk) 09:30, 13 February 2017 (UTC) (aber so was von pro, ja, auf geht's)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Julle (talk) 09:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Codc (talk) 10:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --YaganZ (talk) 10:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lutheraner (talk) 15:39, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Partynia (talk) 16:05, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --XaviYuahanda (talk) 16:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep-- ARASH PT talk 17:44, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pittimann (talk) 17:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--PaulaMeh (talk) 18:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Agricolax (talk) 19:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Plagiat (talk) 19:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --SDKmac (talk) 00:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --JustBerry (talk) 06:57, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Helfmann (talk) 13:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Andim (talk) 14:46, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Slökmann (talk) 16:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Trollflöjten^αω 17:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --JWBE (talk) 19:24, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 22:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 06:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep --Mellebga (talk) 09:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AFBorchert (talk) 10:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Baladid (talk) 12:55, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ----Elisauer (talk) 13:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lepricavark (talk) 18:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 21:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep My favorite steward. Good luck. --Meno25 (talk) 10:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kein Einstein (talk) 13:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hardenacke (talk) 14:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 21:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Aquilinae (talk) 06:56, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gulaschkanone99 (talk) 07:18, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wibramuc (talk) 09:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Trigonomie (talk) 10:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pro @xqt 12:54, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --TJH2018 talk 22:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Brackenheim (talk) 23:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 02:38, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:52, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FNDE (talk) 17:08, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --ST ○ 19:07, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --S. F. B. Morse (talk) 04:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --İncelemeelemani (talk) 12:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --MB-one (talk) 18:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 19:24, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep really knows what he is talking about and also does a lot of things --Neozoon (talk)
Keep--WhoisWhoME (talk) 05:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Matthias Süßen (talk) 08:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Unscheinbar (talk) 09:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep up the good work! Jonathan Groß (talk) 12:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Berihert (talk) 13:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- FriedhelmW (talk) 16:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no particular reason :) → «« Man77 »» ^[de] 20:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Raboe001 (talk) 20:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Great job, yes you can! --RudolfSimon (talk) 22:47, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
{{keep}} --RudolfSimon (talk) 10:16, 26 February 2017 (UTC) - A reliable pillar for the movement![reply]
Keep --Lena1 (talk) 10:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --MarcelBuehner (talk) 15:05, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steindy (talk) 19:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –SJ talk 21:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 22:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ffm (talk) 22:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Septembermorgen (talk) 18:25, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Καλό παιδί είναι. --KoriAna 1 (talk) 13:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep // Martin Kraft (talk) 16:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Danke für deine gute Arbeit! --Itti (talk) 21:24, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --MBurch (talk) 12:32, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Euku (talk) 22:04, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kritzolina (talk) 22:08, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kurtis (talk) 02:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nixnubix (talk) 18:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 10:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 18:37, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 21:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep wer? --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 10:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gerhardvalentin (talk) 11:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 18:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. You do a outstanding work. Thanks for volunteering once again. RadiX ∞ 20:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Otberg (talk) 20:25, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Schwarz7201 (talk) 23:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Keep up the good work! --Ptolusque (talk) 00:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Excellent work as steward. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 02:16, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I wouldn't even dare to leave a feedback :) Just keep him. ~ Nahid ^Talk 10:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, though he already has too much support (relatively). Sa vh ^ñ 10:32, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Danke für Deine Freizeit! (Wollte erst schreiben "Danke für Dein 'Angaschemang'" - aber das verstehen die Anglofonen dann nachher falsch ;) --.js^{[democracy needed]} 13:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Einsbor

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: pl, en-3, fr-2
Personal info: This is my second confimation and I am ready to serve as steward for next year. I really appreciate the community trust and I never abused it. I'm mainly active at permissions and checkuser requests and I want to continue work on this particular area. This year I've been scrutineer in two local ArbCom elections. I know, that I am not the most active among stewards, but I think my input is valuable and helpful for the community. I'm always open for to the point criticism. Thank you in advance for your opinions, einsbor _talk 10:59, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Einsbor

Keep Active enough and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 14:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good. --Vogone (talk) 14:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Scrutineer for English and Persian Wikipedia elections. 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep, good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Michał Sobkowski (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yarl (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Torrosbak (talk) 15:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~Cybularny ^Speak? 15:52, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns. Helpful and present in steward discussions. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 19:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep StevenJ81 (talk) 20:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 21:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MechQuester (talk) 22:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Never active on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 00:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns at all.—Ah3kal (talk) 02:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep PawełMM (talk) 07:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 10:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 11:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity and no concerns — NickK (talk) 14:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 15:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--CreativeC38 (talk) 19:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 19:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Chansey (talk) 21:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --——d—n—f (talk) 07:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep #SFW, Marshallsumter? Klaas `Z4␟` V: 16:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course. Neonek12 (talk) 17:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 21:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Emptywords (talk) 22:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Elfhelm (talk) 22:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems good. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:11, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:27, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- not active in Wikiversity. Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep competent and suitably active — billinghurst sDrewth 12:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Archenzo (talk) 16:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:15, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pnapora (talk) 22:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 08:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- still not active in Wikiversity Plagiat (talk) 19:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Altkatholik62 (talk) 22:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 22:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because I don't require activity in Wikiversity. Lepricavark (talk) 18:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:19, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 02:50, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:52, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eraevsky (обс.) 12:00, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ffm (talk) 22:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 10:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 21:47, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 18:25, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Very good. RadiX ∞ 20:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 02:16, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Everything looks great :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, valuable addition. Sa vh ^ñ 10:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep please. ~ Nahid ^Talk 10:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hoo man

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: de-N, en-3, fr-1
Personal info: Hello everyone, I have been serving as steward for three years by now. I have helped out in various areas, often with a technical focus during these three years.
I have been a Wikimedian since 2008, active in the Small Wiki Monitoring Team since 2010 and have been global rollbacker and a global administrator until I got elected as a steward in early 2014. Furthermore I'm an administrator on Wikidata and casually active on various other projects.
Nowadays I volunteer by helping to maintain MediaWiki extensions related to global administration and steward tasks, also I have access to the Wikimedia foundation's servers which I also occasionally use to support steward actions. Besides, I'm working as a Wikidata developer for Wikimedia Germany.
In the upcoming year, I plan to continue working on incoming requests and by supporting my fellow stewards with technical matters as needed. - Hoo man (talk) 21:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Hoo man

Keep Active enough and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 14:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good. --Vogone (talk) 14:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep, good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep helpful steward/developer with SUL (sollte aber sein Statement gerne selbst übersetzen) --Bjarlin (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ra'ike (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 19:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep StevenJ81 (talk) 20:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gereon K. (talk) 20:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mbch331 (talk) 21:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 21:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 21:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - ok --Rax (talk) 22:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Not active on Wikiversity since 2013! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ok —Ah3kal (talk) 02:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 10:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity and no concerns — NickK (talk) 14:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Udo T. (talk) 14:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nolispanmo (talk) 14:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 15:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Very helpful user.--Syum90 (talk) 18:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Didi43 (talk) 20:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--CreativeC38 (talk) 19:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.— Ping08 (talk) 00:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 16:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 21:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Coffins (talk) 18:38, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Cirdan (talk) 19:01, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:28, 11 February 2017 (UTC) sehr gern[reply]
Keep —MisterSynergy (talk) 22:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Andreas Werle (talk) 07:49, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jbergner (talk) 08:43, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- not active in Wikiversity. Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:41, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Enzian44 (talk) 11:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep even just for building effective and needed tools, and understanding the needs — billinghurst sDrewth 12:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --1971markus (talk) 12:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Why not? — regards, Revi 14:36, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Grüße vom Sänger ♫^(Reden) 16:51, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 19:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep hoo he? scnr --Ghilt (talk) 20:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 21:39, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geolina163 (talk) 23:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jivee Blau (talk) 02:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 08:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Commander-pirx (talk) 09:39, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Julle (talk) 09:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Codc (talk) 10:03, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Plagiat (talk) 19:28, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Altkatholik62 (talk) 22:20, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --JustBerry (talk) 06:57, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Helfmann (talk) 13:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 22:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because Wikiversity activity is not required. Lepricavark (talk) 18:50, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:19, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 21:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Calak (talk) 05:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 10:02, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matěj Suchánek (talk) 20:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JackPotte (talk) 20:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pro @xqt 12:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Brackenheim (talk) 23:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 02:50, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:52, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --SDKmac (talk) 11:46, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --S. F. B. Morse (talk) 05:05, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Matthias Süßen (talk) 08:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Raboe001 (talk) 20:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eraevsky (обс.) 13:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep // Martin Kraft (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Danke für deine gute Arbeit! --Itti (talk) 21:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --S.Didam (talk) 17:58, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kritzolina (talk) 22:09, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 10:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 21:47, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 18:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Obviously. Good steward and hardworking developer. RadiX ∞ 19:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:11, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Schwarz7201 (talk) 23:25, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 02:17, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Invaluable as always. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, valuable addition. Sa vh ^ñ 10:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the best techenical member of the team. Please. ~ Nahid ^Talk 10:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Selbstverständlich gern :) --.js^{[democracy needed]} 13:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jyothis

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: …
Personal info: Hello my fellow Wikimedians! It has been a pleasure and a privilege to serve this community this far and I would certainly love to continue for another term. As in the past, my focus for the past year has been emergency support for fighting spammers and vandalism and have been around in IRC as much as I could for the community. Please keep the feedback loop flowing and would love to improve as we fly.

Comments about Jyothis

Keep Active enough and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 14:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Steward activity is still high enough for me to confirm, but it should not become much less in the future. --Vogone (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep, good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues.—Ah3kal (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Still active and helpful in both on-wiki work, and in the steward discussions on-list. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 19:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 23:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Not active on Wikiversity since 2011! --Marshallsumter (talk) 00:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 10:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 11:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity and no concerns — NickK (talk) 14:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 15:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep that is a plus I'd like to say the one minus up there 8-D — The preceding unsigned comment was added by KlaasZ4usV (talk)
Keep —Marco Aurelio 21:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Samuele2002 (talk) 11:46, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:29, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Howan Hansi (talk) 08:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- not active in Wikiversity. Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep competent and suitably active — billinghurst sDrewth 12:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Archenzo (talk) 16:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 08:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Plagiat (talk) 20:41, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --JustBerry (talk) 06:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--AryanSogd ^(t) 17:46, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 22:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no valid concerns have been presented. Lepricavark (talk) 18:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 21:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 10:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:52, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eraevsky (обс.) 13:05, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 10:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 21:47, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Not active enough --Uğurkent^talk 18:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Helpful and competent. RadiX ∞ 19:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:11, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough, no issues with actions. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 02:17, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, valuable addition. Sa vh ^ñ 10:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep often seen him on IRC fighting LTAs. ~ Nahid ^Talk 10:35, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Linedwell

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: fr, en-3, it-2
Personal info: Hello everyone,

I have been steward for two years and I would be glad to continue to serve the Wikimedia community in 2017. My activity this year was slightly the same than the last 2 years. I was mainly involved in global renames requests and permissions requests, and also cross-wiki spam and LTA (Long Term Abuse) fight. In 2017, I plan to be as active and available as I was in 2016.
Thank you for your confidence,

Linedwell (talk) 13:05, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Linedwell

Keep Active enough and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 14:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good. --Vogone (talk) 14:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted, experienced & active. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep, good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ok FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 15:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK, no issues.—Ah3kal (talk) 17:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oui – Ajraddatz (talk)
Keep -FASTILY 19:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 23:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Not active on Wikiversity since 2015! --Marshallsumter (talk) 00:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 10:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep --Umberto NURS (msg) 11:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good and diverse activity — NickK (talk) 14:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 15:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kumʞum quoi ? 20:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --——d—n—f (talk) 07:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it's becoming sort of boring Klaas `Z4␟` V: 16:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 21:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:45, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:29, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- not active in Wikiversity. Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep competent and sufficiently active — billinghurst sDrewth 12:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Archenzo (talk) 16:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 08:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Plagiat (talk) 19:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mattho69 (talk) 22:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 22:08, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Housterdam (talk) 13:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:19, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Linedwell's not having edited at Wikiversity for a year or two is irrelevant to this discussion. Lepricavark (talk) 18:52, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:52, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geoide (talk) 17:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eraevsky (обс.) 13:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Keep --Minoo (talk) 17:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep wherever he goes active next year. Kikuyu3 (talk) 13:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 10:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 21:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 18:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 19:42, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 02:17, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, valuable addition. Sa vh ^ñ 10:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Experienced LTA fighter. ~ Nahid ^Talk 10:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MBisanz

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en
Personal info: Hello. Over the last year, I have continued to work the areas where I've traditionally been active in the global community, such as renames and SRP. I also helped out in a modest extent with global locks and checkuser, which are areas I would like to expand upon in the coming year. And I've remained active with my home project as an administrator and oversighter.
One aspirational goal I have is to work to find a way to better coordinate local project activities with global functions. For example, a number of local projects are very good with identifying abusive usernames and sockpuppetry, but there remains a gap between the local blocking of those accounts and a global response (e.g., identifying if the locally-blocked sock is doing similarly problematic conduct on other projects). I don't have a good answer to this problem (and it is a problem that stewards cannot, and should not, solve on their own), but I hope to work with others on it.
I recognize that I am not the most active or technically-savvy steward, but I believe I can still assist with steward duties. I think that one of the positive attributes I bring to the role is a willingness to listen to feedback from others and learn new tasks. Please feel free to approach me here or on my talk page with any questions or concerns you may have. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 20:18, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about MBisanz

Keep I thought he would improve his activity, and he did. --Rs chen 7754 14:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Steward activity this year has indeed improved. If it could remain at that level in the future (or improve even more ;-)) it would be excellent. --Vogone (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep, good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove doesn't need it anymore, most of his work is global renaming which has its own Global right and most of his locks on meta have been quite unnecessary.--Ste moc 14:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Improved activity this year as promised. Always a pleasure to chat when we have the chance! – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 19:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 20:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 21:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Thanks for your work on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 00:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no issues.—Ah3kal (talk) 02:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 10:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, active outside global renames as well — NickK (talk) 14:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 15:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure! --AFBorchert (talk) 19:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Chansey (talk) 21:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holmium (talk) 14:05, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ankry (talk) 14:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep global renaming is IMNSHO (going to be?) one of the most valuable tasks of new and present stewards and higher. Klaas `Z4␟` V: 16:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 21:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:45, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Absolutely. Tony (talk) 13:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:29, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Howan Hansi (talk) 08:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep competent and suitably active — billinghurst sDrewth 12:12, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Archenzo (talk) 16:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 08:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --YaganZ (talk) 10:42, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Plagiat (talk) 20:43, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 22:08, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AFBorchert (talk) 10:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lepricavark (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 21:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 10:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 19:25, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eraevsky (обс.) 13:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –SJ talk 21:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ultraexactzz ^Talk 16:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 21:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 18:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Reasonably active. Realiable. Helpful. RadiX ∞ 19:42, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Mifter (talk) 01:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 02:18, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 07:43, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:39, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, valuable addition. Sa vh ^ñ 10:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues. ~ Nahid ^Talk 10:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MF-Warburg

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: de-N, en-3, fr-2, la-2, tet-1, es-1
Personal info: It was already my fourth year as a steward. My main focus of (steward) activity again was on right requests (SRP), and blocking and locking of spambots, cross-wiki vandals & abusers, and the handling of OTRS requests. Since some time I am also much more active on IRC again and handle requests that come up there. I'll be happy to continue as a steward for a further year if the community still wants me to.

Comments about MF-Warburg

Keep Good. --Vogone (talk) 14:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted, experienced & active. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not as active as in the past but still active enough. --Rs chen 7754 14:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Scrutineer for Persian Wikipedia elections. 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted and active.– KPFC 💬 14:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep, good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Murma174 (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active & clueful. I respect his opinion whether I agree or not, valuable for the steward team. —Ah3kal (talk) 17:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep yes, very good :-) – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep just like Ajraddatz above (sollte aber sein Statement gerne selbst übersetzen) --Bjarlin (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 19:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep StevenJ81 (talk) 20:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 21:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - ok --Rax (talk) 22:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - One edit in the past year on Wikiversity wins over zero! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Freddy2001 ^talk 09:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 10:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, active and very experienced, I particularly appreciated his questions for steward candidates that helped a lot to decide on the candidates — NickK (talk) 14:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Udo T. (talk) 14:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nolispanmo (talk) 14:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Redlinux (talk) 19:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--CreativeC38 (talk) 19:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bubo 容 19:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nungalpiriggal (talk) 21:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Chansey (talk) 21:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --——d—n—f (talk) 07:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 16:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 21:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove no thanks. eurodyne (talk) 08:37, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ankry (talk) 09:43, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:45, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Samuele2002 (talk) 11:59, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Coffins (talk) 18:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --SMAUG (Talk – My contributions) 20:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:29, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Brainswiffer (talk) 06:43, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Andreas Werle (talk) 07:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jbergner (talk) 08:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- not active in Wikiversity. Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Enzian44 (talk) 11:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --1971markus (talk) 12:13, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the thinker and contemplater, active and competent — billinghurst sDrewth 12:14, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Archenzo (talk) 16:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Grüße vom Sänger ♫^(Reden) 16:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good work. --Palnatoke (talk) 21:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geolina163 (talk) 23:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 08:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep working. --Commander-pirx (talk) 09:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Codc (talk) 10:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, why not? — regards, Revi 12:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep-- ARASH PT talk 17:44, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Plagiat (talk) 20:44, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --SDKmac (talk) 00:03, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --JustBerry (talk) 06:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--AryanSogd ^(t) 17:53, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 22:09, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep so apparently a single edit at Wikiversity makes all the difference. Whatever. Lepricavark (talk) 18:55, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Has anyone also checked, if he has edited at a Wikinews, Wikibooks, Wikivoyage, Wikisource and Wiktionary wiki in the last year (and I might have missed any sister wiki except Commons/Wikidata, sorry for that)? Perhaps that would make the difference then. ;-) It might even be that we wouldn't have any stewards anymore, if every steward would have to make at least one edit per year in every sister project. As for MF-Warburg, I'm sure that he knows those (also the smaller) wikis quite well because of Incubator, the language committee and importing new wikis. --Bjarlin (talk) 20:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 10:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hardenacke (talk) 14:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pro @xqt 12:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --TJH2018 talk 22:23, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Brackenheim (talk) 23:16, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 02:49, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --S. F. B. Morse (talk) 05:08, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --İncelemeelemani (talk) 12:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --S.Didam (talk) 13:43, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Elvaube ^?! 07:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Raboe001 (talk) 20:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minoo (talk) 17:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –SJ talk 21:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ffm (talk) 22:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 15:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Seems like one of our best stewards. Taivo (talk) 17:17, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Danke für deine Arbeit! --Itti (talk) 21:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Trusted and experienced. Kelvin (talk) 09:12, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 10:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 21:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Experienced --Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thank you for your comments in discussions. --Uğurkent^talk 18:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 23:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - No issues. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 02:21, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Great work as always. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:39, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, valuable addition. Sa vh ^ñ 10:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep always value your thoughts. NickK said everything :) ~ Nahid ^Talk 10:40, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MarcoAurelio

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: es, en-2, fr-2, la-1 (can understand written an, ca, pt, it, gl, ext)
Personal info:

Hello all,
This year I have continued been active in the areas I used to be active as well in the past, focusing on on-wiki steward requests of all kinds such as permissions or counter vandalism and/or spam activities. I have also given a hand on global rename requests and have patrolled the edit filter logs to detect and stop the recurring spam bots that try to damage our sites inserting spam across the projects, which is a very time-consuming activity and for which there is not a technical solution to prevent them from even attempting to spam yet, but to set, watch and fine tune edit filters and spam blacklist rules.
I have also tried to provide support to the communities when requested and have continued providing minor technical support to them when requested by them as well. A general overview of my on-wiki steward activity can be seen in my personal log. I have also participated on mailing lists and on-wiki discussions as well.
I still feel I can give a hand in the steward duties and therefore I would like to ask for your support for another term.
Thank you,
—Marco Aurelio 12:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about MarcoAurelio

Keep Highly active and taking care of maintenance tasks (wikisets, etc.) that are often ignored. --Rs chen 7754 14:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted, experienced & active. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep obviously trusted and active. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Shivanarayana (talk) 14:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep, good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ganímedes (talk) 14:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for all your work MarcoAurelio. --Yeza (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Murma174 (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Euphydryas (msg) 15:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :D — regards, Revi 15:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Active enough, good to go imo. — regards, Revi 12:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course keep and continue in your steward work! --Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep please. Active, multitasking and trusted.—Ah3kal (talk) 17:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course! – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bjarlin (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 19:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep StevenJ81 (talk) 20:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 21:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - active, experienced, trusted --Rax (talk) 22:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MechQuester (talk) 22:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, MarcoAurelio is an allround steward, very active and an extremely valuable addition to the team. It is always a pleasure to work together with him. Sa vh ^ñ 00:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — xaosflux ^Talk 00:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Thanks for your work on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thank you! --Ruthven (talk) 08:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He is very valuable as a steward who is also active in technical/development spheres. This, that and the other (talk) 09:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 10:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Udo T. (talk) 13:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, very active in different spheres, no concerns — NickK (talk) 14:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 15:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the best steward ))) --Hayordi (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. A pillar of the community, it's an absolute pleasure to work with him. In my opinion he's the most complete steward in addition to one of the most active.--Syum90 (talk) 18:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
a strong Keep ! --CreativeC38 (talk) 19:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Samuele2002 (talk) 19:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nungalpiriggal (talk) 21:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Tursetic 04:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --——d—n—f (talk) 07:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 08:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
absolutely Keep MASS=MarcoAurelio SuperStar Klaas `Z4␟` V: 16:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. — Ping08 (talk) 07:52, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:45, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:30, 11 February 2017 (UTC) of course[reply]
Keep --Rocío Mantis (talk) 22:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC) +1[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Howan Hansi (talk) 08:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 2016-17 steward of the year award (imnsho) — billinghurst sDrewth 12:15, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Archenzo (talk) 16:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lucas (talk) 04:28, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 08:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep please, does an excellent job! --YaganZ (talk) 10:39, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep who? --Plagiat (talk) 19:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 01:47, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --JustBerry (talk) 06:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--AryanSogd ^(t) 17:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 22:10, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 06:50, 15 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lepricavark (talk) 18:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lautaro 97 (talk) 21:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Definitely. It's always been a pleasure working with MarcoAurelio, and I would love to have him as a steward for yet another year. odder (talk) 02:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matěj Suchánek (talk) 20:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 21:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pro @xqt 12:58, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --TJH2018 talk 22:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 02:48, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --SDKmac (talk) 11:52, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 08:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep thanks for your work --Itti (talk) 21:26, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Geoide (talk) 13:57, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--L736E (talk) 18:35, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 10:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Melquíades (msg) 13:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 21:49, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and experienced--Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 18:44, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Skills are outstanding. RadiX ∞ 19:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Agree with billinghurst. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 02:19, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Excellent work as always :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:40, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Steward of the year 2016 :) ~ Nahid ^Talk 10:41, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mardetanha

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: fa, az, en-3, tr-2
Personal info: Dear Community, it has been great please and honor for me to serve our community, like past years I was mainly active in the field of fighting and long-term abusers and spambots, I was regularly available on IRC for emergency occasions and monitoring Small wikis and helping urgent requests. I would like to serve another year to help out different projects. Mardetanha ^talk 14:52, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Mardetanha

Neutral Not that active, and this is far from the temperament I would expect from a steward: [8] --Rs chen 7754 14:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have been active like past years but this year I felt we need to focus more on off-wiki actions and introduce my our projects to more people in Iran, which caused minor reductions in on-wiki actions/edits but I did my best to help as much as I could in steward related activities Mardetanha ^talk 21:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral A good and helpful guy, but the activity level is concerning. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Trusted user. --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep, good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I believe your activity is enough to continue serving as steward. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Arian ^Talk 17:56, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 19:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Rschen7754's link is a concern. Miniapolis 20:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 21:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - ok --Rax (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- MechQuester (talk) 22:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep though link is a bit concerning, I don't find it too bad and I still think this user can continue serving the Wikimedia community as a steward. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 23:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Question: Can you acknowledge that you are up to date concerning the addition of the OTRS member global permission? Sa vh ^ñ 00:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

sure I am Mardetanha ^talk 00:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in that case, assuming you've learned from your mistake. Please however be more careful when asking others to "at least have decency to accept it was wrong of [the other person] to do this". Sa vh ^ñ 01:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Remove - Not active on Wikiversity since 2008! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Manter Alex Pereira ^falaê 01:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep always helpful and active MoiraMoira (talk) 09:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 10:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, active enough and very helpful — NickK (talk) 14:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 15:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Woodwalker_talk 02:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep him/her :-)--Arash (talk) 16:00, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep benefit of the doubt AGF etc Klaas `Z4␟` V: 17:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 21:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Krd 11:47, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:31, 11 February 2017 (UTC) any time[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Visem (talk) 08:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- not active in Wikiversity. Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:46, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep competent, though could be more active, fellow steward support demonstrates contributions to team —billinghurst sDrewth 12:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 08:58, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He's doing his best in off-wiki activities. MohammadtheEditor (talk) 15:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Sunfyre (talk) 16:39, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep-- ARASH PT talk 17:42, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Plagiat (talk) 20:46, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Julle (talk) 00:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 22:10, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lepricavark (talk) 18:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Calak (talk) 05:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course. --Meno25 (talk) 10:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 02:48, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mardetanha with Gold Heart :) --AFlorence (talk) 22:26, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Behzad39 (talk) 11:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 09:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Minoo (talk) 18:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 10:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 21:49, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Uğurkent^talk 18:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Always reliable and helpful at steward's tasks. I would only reccomend you to take in consideration the points raised by Rschen7754 and Savh. RadiX ∞ 19:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough, no significant issues about actions. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 02:21, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The incident mentioned by Rschen is disappointing, but they've done great work for years and recognized that that was not okey so I don't see a reason to be overly concerned. We all make mistakes. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:41, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Always reliable and helpful. As he recognized the incident mentioned by Rschen so no issue at all. ~ Nahid ^Talk 10:44, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Masti

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: pl-N, en-4, de-3, ru-2, several European -1
Personal info: That was my first year as steward. The goal I set for myself in the beginning was to help as much as I can learning the tools and rules on the way. This has been achieved. I was mainly active in global renaming, user rights and helping small wikis with CheckUser duties. I will keep trying to help with Long Term Abusers and be more active with OTRS requests masti <talk> 20:31, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Masti

Keep, only one bad mistake [9] and I don't see that in itself grounds for removal. --Rs chen 7754 14:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Trusted and experienced. Rzuwig^► 14:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Michał Sobkowski (talk) 14:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yarl (talk) 14:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good --Kayser Ahmad (talk) 15:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Torrosbak (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~Cybularny ^Speak? 16:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues.—Ah3kal (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep though please be more active in steward discussions too! – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 19:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - ok --Rax (talk) 22:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- MechQuester (talk) 22:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 23:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Thanks for your work on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep PawełMM (talk) 07:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, very good activity in addition to relevant experience — NickK (talk) 14:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 15:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good work during the last year.--Syum90 (talk) 18:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ptjackyll (talk) 19:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.— Ping08 (talk) 00:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --——d—n—f (talk) 07:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very good user. Neonek12 (talk) 17:44, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral —Marco Aurelio 22:01, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Emptywords (talk) 22:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Elfhelm (talk) 22:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ankry (talk) 09:43, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:47, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 13:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:31, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Visem (talk) 08:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:49, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and competent — billinghurst sDrewth 12:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hasive • talk • 12:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Archenzo (talk) 16:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pnapora (talk) 22:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 08:58, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Arbnos (talk) 19:20, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ride on --Plagiat (talk) 19:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --JustBerry (talk) 07:01, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Рулин (talk) 20:04, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep proved that my oppose last year was wrong. Natuur12 (talk) 22:11, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lepricavark (talk) 19:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pro @xqt 12:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --TJH2018 talk 22:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 02:47, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eraevsky (talk) 10:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minoo (talk) 18:00, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alan ffm (talk) 22:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep thanks for your work --Itti (talk) 21:26, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Trusted and experienced. Kelvin (talk) 09:04, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 10:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 21:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nemo 15:55, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 18:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Active enough and reliable. RadiX ∞ 18:55, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 02:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:42, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ah, my running mate from last year. We'll survive :) ~ Nahid ^Talk 10:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Matanya

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en, he
Personal info: Hello, I have been at the same activity level this year, mainly anti-vandalism/spam and rights requests, I have been working on tooling for stewards, and I hope this work will show its fruits this year. I'm on IRC regularly and try to be helpful. I'm planning to remain active this year. questions and comments are welcome. best Matanya (talk) 00:46, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Matanya

Keep Trusted and experienced. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not as active as in the past but still active enough. --Rs chen 7754 14:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Always willing to help out with urgent issues on IRC Cameron11598 (talk) 17:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough and no issues.—Ah3kal (talk) 17:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 19:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Valued steward, helpful especially with the Hebrew-speaking community. Thank you for previous work and keep it up!--Nahum (talk) 21:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 21:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- MechQuester (talk) 22:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 23:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, though I'd appreciate more involvement & a higher activity level. Sa vh ^ñ 00:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Not active on Wikiversity since 2015! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted and experienced. Geagea (talk) 06:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 10:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active, trusted and experienced — NickK (talk) 14:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep An great and most active Steward. vote of confidence--Leon saudanha (talk) 14:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 22:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. — Ping08 (talk) 08:04, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Krd 11:48, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 13:55, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:02, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Michal Lester לסטר (talk) 16:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:32, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —MisterSynergy (talk) 22:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Howan Hansi (talk) 08:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- not active in Wikiversity. Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:51, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep competent and sufficently active — billinghurst sDrewth 12:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Archenzo (talk) 16:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove This user has inappropriate uploading in Commons. It contains copyright violation. I don't need steward who is NOT familiar with copyrights.--Kkairri (talk) 08:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 08:59, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Active (too) enough. (If the meaning is unclear, this is Keep.) — regards, Revi 12:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Plagiat (talk) 20:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Daryag (talk) 20:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep at it, Matanya :) Alleycat80 (talk) 23:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --JustBerry (talk) 07:00, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Ovedc (talk) 07:53, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nittai Gallili (talk) 08:08, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep מנחם.אל (talk) 08:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep קובץ על יד (talk) 09:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Eladti (talk) 10:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted, willing to help and active. MathKnight (talk) 11:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the best. Active and reliable. בורה בורה (talk) 15:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--AryanSogd ^(t) 17:47, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep שמזן (talk) 20:45, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Besides being a great steward he knows a lot about copyright dispites what Kkairri claims. Natuur12 (talk) 22:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IKhitron (talk) 22:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AFBorchert (talk) 10:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lepricavark (talk) 19:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Borochov edit (talk) 21:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Assayas (talk) 21:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted, experienced and always willing to help. Liadmalone (talk) 21:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted and helpful. Ravit (talk) 10:26, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted, experienced and always willing to help. Deror avi (talk) 12:46, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 02:47, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mr. Brinks (talk) 23:22, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 09:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep always willing to help אמא של גולן (talk) 11:50, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eraevsky (обс.) 13:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Keep --Minoo (talk) 18:01, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Itzike (talk) 17:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hanay (talk) 12:42, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Greetings From our wikipedia! Ofek j (talk) 18:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Geoide (talk) 13:51, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 1Or (talk) 05:38, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 10:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 21:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 18:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. You do a good work all around. Thanks for your time. RadiX ∞ 18:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Mifter (talk) 01:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no issues. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 02:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:42, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep experienced and no issues. ~ Nahid ^Talk 10:46, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Melos

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: it, scn, en
Personal info: Unfortunately I'm quite busy in real life. I leave to decide the community if my "5" action are useful yet for the project. Thank you --Melos (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Melos

Remove 5 edits on Meta since the last confirmations, and mostly active in March (around the last elections) and November and December (did a few LTA CU checks and multilocks to "prepare" for these elections). --Rs chen 7754 14:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Unfortunately seems to have vanished. Thanks for the past service. --Vogone (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Not active enough and unfortunately did not create statement on time. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I personally think any number of good actions is better than 0. --Vituzzu (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Not active enough. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactivity...re-apply when you can be active again--Ste moc 14:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Unfortunately it has not been active in recent months. There is no use for it to remain steward. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
~~{{Remove}} 5 steward actions are too few. --Gce (talk) 16:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)~~ After watched that I changed idea, I thought that he literally did 5 steward actions, but this was not the case so I'm removing my vote. --Gce (talk) 22:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Not active.—Ah3kal (talk) 17:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pracchia-78 (talk) 19:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per lack of activity. -FASTILY 19:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral due to inactivity; doesn't seem to have time to do the job justice now. Miniapolis 20:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Rschen7754 --DCB (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove quite inactive. Thanks for your past work though. – Ajraddatz (talk) 22:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove too inactive. Iazyges (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. With your limited activity it is impossible to effectively remain up to date on steward matters. Sa vh ^ñ 00:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bjarlin (talk) 00:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC) I'm seeing around 50 steward actions in Novembre/Decembre which is helping out other stewards and is not little. Can't find the problem here, not that inactive. So let's see.[reply]
Remove - Not active on Wikiversity since 2011! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Samuele2002 (talk) 06:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Aplasia (talk) 08:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Good user, but not very active. --Umberto NURS (msg) 11:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (@Rschen7754: "did a few LTA CU checks and multilocks to "prepare" for these elections", ehm, what happened to assume good faith? ;-)--Shivanarayana (talk) 11:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I find your activity way too low, but wish to thank you for your past service regardless of the outcome. — TBloemink _talk 13:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for honestly stating that you are not as active as you wanted to. If you feel you are no longer able to stay active, you can resign or not apply for re-election next year — NickK (talk) 14:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Not active in his Steward functions--Leon saudanha (talk) 14:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Vito.--Syum90 (talk) 18:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Vituzzu. --Phyrexian ɸ 06:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nothing against Melos but I would expect to be more active as steward. --НУРшЯGIO^{(beware of the moose)} 17:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral as Umberto NURS leaning weak keep. Melos is clueful user and I'm sure that he can be put up to date quickly, however your activity is rather low. I'd be happy to see you confirmed if you think you can have some more time for stewardrying. It's sad to see the 'old guys' depart for me. Thanks. —Marco Aurelio 22:08, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Krd 11:48, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:04, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Vito. Matanya (talk) 18:16, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 5 is more than 0. --თოგო ^(D) 21:33, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Vito, Thogo, and the current policy regarding confirmations. As a steward, I have not lost trust in Melos, albeit we all may want to consider revising the minimal activity levels. -- Avi (talk) 05:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Vito --.snoopy. ✉ 10:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on fellow steward comment, inactivity card can only be played once — billinghurst sDrewth 12:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Vito--Rodrigodacuna (talk) 15:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Archenzo (talk) 16:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Civvì (talk) 20:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral — Ping08 (talk) 20:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ruthven (talk) 20:41, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elwood (talk) 20:41, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "uan is megl che zero".--Dome ^{A disposizione!} 23:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Gridditsch (talk) 09:00, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Vituzzu --Ask21 (talk) 11:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Plagiat (talk) 19:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lepido (talk) 23:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —An Macanese 15:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral hope you will become more active this year. Natuur12 (talk) 22:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
* Neutral --Elmie (talk) 17:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC) 5 edits is a very low level...maybe you get some more time in the futre[reply]
Neutral Lepricavark (talk) 19:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Demart81 (Qualcuno mi cerca?) 20:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Few is always better than nothing--L736E ^{tell me} 21:32, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:54, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geoide (talk) 17:45, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per above. Alan ^(talk) 19:27, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Minoo (talk) 18:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Polite and helpful. --pegasovagante (tell me) 10:33, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Remove Not active enough. Ofek j (talk) 18:26, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep per Avi. Experience and familiarity and trust with the issues is valuable. Quiddity (talk) 21:58, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Not active enough. --Uğurkent^talk 18:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I have no concerns about the activity level, we all have obligations outside the project and I am not concerned about their ability to serve or judgment. Mifter (talk) 02:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep, per Vituzzu and MA. RadiX ∞ 03:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep activity levels vary over time and we'd all love for Melos to be active more consistently but they're still a net positive with no concerns outside of activity levels, so I think the community benefit from Melos' continued work as a steward. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "Any number of good actions is better than 0." per Vituzzu and much more than 5 per Gce. --.js^{[democracy needed]} 13:47, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mentifisto

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en, mt, it-2
Personal info: I'm usually 'passively' around (handling spambots mostly, and responding to requests particularly when no one is around). Besides watching the stream of unifications on IRC, I typically handle SRG, SRP, VR, and less often SRUC and SR/SUL.

Comments about Mentifisto

Keep Good. --Vogone (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Barely active, and also this was unimpressive (though to his credit, he did admit his error later). --Rs chen 7754 14:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- To clarify: this is more of a neutral leaning remove. As a violation of the global CU policy, this could have been reported to the Ombudsman Commission (and rightly so, as it could have provided unauthorized access to CU data). Why I (barely) didn't vote remove was because he admitted his error. --Rs chen 7754 01:36, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - It was indeed an error made out of haste... as the situation was superficially the other candidate had enough support, so it didn't look complicated... and only one candidate seemed to have issues, so technically the other had sufficient support to get the data since they were also identified... -- Menti fisto 02:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough. —Ah3kal (talk) 17:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 19:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We all make mistakes. Miniapolis 20:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- MechQuester (talk) 22:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- εΔ ω 22:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC) a single error does not wipe away months of excellent work as steward.
Neutral Not super active, but alright. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 23:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, not active enough to keep up to date of the steward practices. I am particularly concerned by the granting of advanced rights on en.wiki which is one of your home wikis. Even though they are unlikely to be erroneous, they should be left to other stewards per the stewards policy. Additionally, the other incident linked by Rschen, where you granted CheckUser rights to a user on a project without any other checkuser, seems to confirm that you are out of touch with the role of stewards. Since you mention a list of steward request pages in the above statement, it is worth noticing that SRUC and SRSUL since 2014 redirect to the same page, and that you have performed 1 edit on SRG, 11 on SRP, none on VR, and none either on SRUC/SRSUL since your last confirmation. I'd also appreciate some greater effort in creating said confirmation statement instead of copying it from previous years, starting by updating the year. The steward toolset is a rather extensive one which should be handled with all possible care. Savh^ñ 23:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- To be fair, some stewards view ArbCom directives as uncontroversial. I feel that we would need further backing to consider this a violation of steward policy, or at least a discussion. --Rs chen 7754 00:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Some stewards might view them as uncontroversial (though that's new to me, and this is really a slippery slope), but I believe them to be potentially controversial as a conflict of interest could exist when performed by someone whose homewiki it concerns and additionally has also been appointed by the ArbCom to such a position himself. I would consider a clearly successful RfCU on es.wiki to be equally uncontroversial, but would equally expressly refrain from acting on it per the policy. Savh^ñ 00:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - I've always assumed COI would exist if the person used the tools directly, rather than simply ticking a box on a decision made elsewhere and collectively... it would be odd then if it was declined due to some personal reason, but ArbCom might as well be able to assign them themselves if they already do so sociologically on the wiki, but as suggested perhaps a discussion is needed to clarify consensus? -- Menti fisto 01:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Not active on Wikiversity since 2015! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. Legitimate concerns raised by Savh.—Ah3kal (talk) 02:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 10:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, activity is at reasonable level (a bit on low side but stable). I am concerned by newiki checkuser case, however, especially given that this was one of the few right changes that year — NickK (talk) 14:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 14:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Concedere i diritti di check-user su una wiki dove non ve ne era neanche uno non procedendo con una seconda nomina è un errore troppo grave, non sono disposto a concedergli la mia fiducia per la riconferma del suo ruolo. --Gce (talk) 00:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral due to activity concerns. —Marco Aurelio 22:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ankry (talk) 09:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Krd 11:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:05, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:16, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:33, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Howan Hansi (talk) 08:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- not active in Wikiversity. Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:56, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral almost remove, saved by fellow stewards' support; you have been around long enough, and sat through stewards' email conversations ti know never to grant rights on a wiki where you hold advanced rights except as a last resort, and lots of waving and prodding — billinghurst sDrewth 12:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Archenzo (talk) 16:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Gridditsch (talk) 09:03, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Plagiat (talk) 19:42, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak remove Per Savh. Natuur12 (talk) 22:18, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not concerned with the technical implementation of an ArbCom mandate, as was the case with the first +CU incident. There's clearly no conflict of interest in your action there, anyone would have implemented it the same way. That said, it's soooo easy to just not take actions on your homewiki - there are so many other stewards! We shouldn't need to have these debates. I am more concerned with making only one CU on a wiki, since the CU policy is one of the core policies that we deal with. Those types of mistakes shouldn't happen, though we're all human, so I'm willing to look past that too. What I am even more concerned about is the lack of overall activity, the total absence from any internal discussion, and the apparent out-of-touchness displayed here as mentioned by Savh. SRSUL hasn't existed in a long time. If you are going to continue in this role, which it seems like the consensus is going towards, then it would be nice to see some activity and effort to not only stay up to date, but effectively enforce the core policies that we deal with. – Ajraddatz (talk) 01:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lepricavark (talk) 19:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:54, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eraevsky (обс.) 13:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Keep --Minoo (talk) 18:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per non-interaction concerns. This place works best when we regularly talk to each other. Quiddity (talk) 22:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I am worried about the it's activity --Uğurkent^talk 18:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - No issues. Mifter (talk) 01:59, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I vaguely recalled such issues about Mentifisto's actions. Although these concerns are legit, there are not enough to plenty justify opposing his confirmation as a steward, given his other skills. As Ajraddatz pointed out, it's highly recommended some effort to stay up to date with our main procedures and policies, in order to avoid this from happening again. RadiX ∞ 04:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajr summed up the situation better than I could :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 10:06, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NahidSultan

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: bn-N, en-3, bpy-1, as-1
Personal info: Hey folks, I've been serving as steward since the last election and this is my first confirmation. Over the year, I have been familiarize myself with the tool set and tried to focus on the job at SR specially in SRP and SRG as I promised to do in my actual statement according to stewards policy. As of January 28, I've 1526 CentralAuth actions, 96 global IP blocks actions and 99 userright changed log, all can be found in here. You can also check my activity graph and CheckUser statistics on loginwiki. I’m fairly present in multiple IRC channels including #cvn-sw, #wikimedia-gs, #wikimedia-admin & #wikimedia-stewards under the nick NahidSultan or Lord_Voldemort. If confirmed I would like to continue helping the community as a steward. Thank you very much for your time to read this and your feedback.

Comments about NahidSultan

Keep Good. --Vogone (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 14:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Obviously dedicated to Wikimedia and active enough. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Jianhui67. --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good --Kayser Ahmad (talk) 15:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues. —Ah3kal (talk) 17:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Chansey (talk) 18:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mahir256 (talk) 18:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 19:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep StevenJ81 (talk) 20:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gereon K. (talk) 20:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- MechQuester (talk) 22:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 23:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Thanks for your work on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Geagea (talk) 06:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Arif80s (talk) 06:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep PawełMM (talk) 07:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 10:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 11:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Udo T. (talk) 13:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not seen your name a lot yet but that is probably my issue. Doing great as far as I can see. — TBloemink _talk 13:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity and reasonable actions — NickK (talk) 14:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 14:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good work during the last year.--Syum90 (talk) 19:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 22:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ankry (talk) 09:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:06, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:17, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:34, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:57, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Too active, good work & responsible actions. Hasive • talk • 11:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep competent and active — billinghurst sDrewth 12:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Archenzo (talk) 16:36, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 09:03, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Why not? — regards, Revi 12:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Aftabuzzaman (talk) 16:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Plagiat (talk) 19:43, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --JustBerry (talk) 07:01, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--AryanSogd ^(t) 17:45, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 22:19, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Arash (talk) 12:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 14:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lepricavark (talk) 19:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 10:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:54, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --İncelemeelemani (talk) 12:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 16:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Minoo (talk) 18:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good.--Harvinder Chandigarh (talk) 19:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kritzolina (talk) 22:09, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nan (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 10:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 22:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep You are very kind and helpful. Thanks for your work. RadiX ∞ 18:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 18:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course, no issues. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 02:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:46, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pmlineditor

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: bn, en-4, hi-2
Personal info: Hi everyone. 2016 was my 2nd year as a steward, and unfortunately, I had significant periods of inactivity, especially in the 2nd half of the year. Last year, I had health issues in September-October, and once I'd gotten better, I was too busy with real life commitments that had been delayed. I was originally not planning to ask for confirmation (hence the late submission of the statement), but I think that I can be more useful this year, barring any exceptional circumstances. I don't expect to be the most active steward, but I will try to help out whenever I can, and definitely more than I did last year. At the moment, I only have admin rights in one project, so the majority of my time on Wikimedia projects can be dedicated to steward work. If I cannot maintain activity this year, I'll definitely not be asking for a further extension. I mainly work on handling spambots and LTAs, via global (b)locking and CU on login.wiki. I would like to continue helping in these areas if the community is willing to reconfirm me. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Pmlineditor

Neutral While I can't vote to remove given his statement and this being the first such confirmation, and that I've never had a problem with their actions, I can't vote to keep given some of his lengthy inactivity in the past, one such incident resulting in the removal of GS. So neutral. --Rs chen 7754 14:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove 8/12 months with less than 5 steward actions, 6/12 months with 0 steward actions. I understand that real-life commitments can hinder Wikimedia activity, but perhaps it's better to take a break from steward activities until these issues are fixed. Best luck, --Vogone (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
{{neutral}} You are a good steward, but your activity levels are a bit concerning. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Decided to change to a weak keep per Juliancolton. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 09:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IMO, he has sufficiently activity to keep his steward rights. I see no evidence of abuse by Pmlineditor. --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactivity...If a steward is not active in their first two years as a steward then they should not have the rights.--Ste moc 14:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral He has not been active in the last few months, but I think he can continue to serve as steward after all. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactivity --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:52, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, still trusted and has enough of a cross-wiki presence to be reasonably useful. I agree that we shouldn't keep inactive stewards around, but I respect Pmlineditor's pledge to not seek confirmation in 2018 if unable to increase activity over the next year. Given his long-term dedication to the project and continued willingness to help out, I think it's fair to approve one more term and see what happens. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Inactivity is an issue but still has my trust, and if he resumes activity would be a net positive to the team. Given the circumstances I would like giving him a chance.—Ah3kal (talk) 17:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mahir256 (talk) 18:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral great user, but concerns with inactivity. -FASTILY 19:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I can't say no, but wonder if you're using your time wisely for yourself. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Circumstances seem to have improved, and there are good explanations for the inactivity. Miniapolis 20:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone --DCB (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- MechQuester (talk) 22:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove No. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Too inactive. Iazyges (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Not active on Wikiversity since 2015! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per his honest statement. Hope he will be able to increase activity this year — NickK (talk) 14:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 14:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, while not one of the most active stewards, he's a very competent and trusted one.--Syum90 (talk) 19:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Rschen. I can't blame anyone for being inactive for health issues as I myself suffered them and Barras above is leaving because of them. I'd like to see you confirmed if you think you are strong enough to devote more time to stewardrying. —Marco Aurelio 22:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Krd 11:50, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 21:28, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:34, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:57, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep competent; reasonable explanation for low activity — would always be best to inform fellow-stewards if out of action for a time — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Billinghurst (talk)
Keep per MarcoAurelio. Luke 081515 12:41, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Archenzo (talk) 16:37, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Gridditsch (talk) 09:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Plagiat (talk) 19:46, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —An Macanese 15:19, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 22:19, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pmlineditor has never really been active in the steward role outside of mindlessly locking spam accounts. A good breakdown of his activity can be found using this tool. He rarely (and perhaps has never) participates in our internal discussions. That said, I'm not seeing any major errors looking through your actions, so I am not explicitly opposed to you continuing in this role. But since you are volunteering to do this, it would be nice to see some actual participation. – Ajraddatz (talk) 01:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Elmie (talk) 17:28, 15 February 2017 (UTC) maybe you get some more time in the futre[reply]
Keep Lepricavark (talk) 19:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:28, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -- We need stewards actively working. If you're not using your flag then do the right thing and turn it in. Chris Troutman (talk) 12:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:54, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minoo (talk) 18:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Ajraddatz. Quiddity (talk) 22:08, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Not active. --Uğurkent^talk 19:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --masti <talk> 22:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It seems he became active again, and when he is around, he is a valued and helpful steward. However, if facing such extended absence again, he would better not seeking another confirmation in the role. RadiX ∞ 01:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I have no issues nor do I find the activity level concerning. Pmlineditor has a solid understanding of policy and their service to the project as a whole is valuable. Mifter (talk) 02:00, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns for me. Activity levels have been lower than ideal in second portion of last year but life gets in the way sometimes and the explanations make plenty of sense. Hope you'll be able to be more active next year! Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Encouraging a volunteer to work more cannot be done by kicking him. My best wishes for your health! --.js^{[democracy needed]} 13:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

QuiteUnusual

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en, it-1, fr-2, es-1
Personal info: I have completed three terms as a steward. I'm happy to continue if people want me to. Despite best intentions it's been a relatively quiet year for me but I do think I've maintained an acceptable level of activity, mostly in anti-spam work. In May 2016 two of my close relatives spent a long period in hospital, one eventually dying, which impacted the time I had to work on-wiki throughout the summer. I'm now back to having more time available and am generally available and watching the noticeboards in the mornings (GMT) for urgent requests and issues. QuiteUnusual (talk) 10:43, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about QuiteUnusual

Keep Good. --Vogone (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not as active as in the past but still active enough. --Rs chen 7754 14:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep You do not see so much activity, but there is no reason to remove it. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough and no issues.—Ah3kal (talk) 17:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good as usual. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 19:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sorry to hear about the rough patch. Miniapolis 20:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- MechQuester (talk) 22:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:08, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 23:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, valued addition to the team. Sa vh ^ñ 23:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Not active on Wikiversity since 2015! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 11:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 11:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity — NickK (talk) 14:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 14:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, very competent, experienced and trustworthy steward.--Syum90 (talk) 19:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--CreativeC38 (talk) 19:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 22:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:50, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:35, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Howan Hansi (talk) 08:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- not active in Wikiversity. Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep competent and active, hope that 2017 is better — billinghurst sDrewth 12:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Archenzo (talk) 16:37, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 09:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Plagiat (talk) 19:48, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 21:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 22:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lepricavark (talk) 19:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep JackPotte (talk) 20:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:55, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eraevsky (обс.) 13:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Keep --Minoo (talk) 18:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep –SJ talk 21:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:37, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Geoide (talk) 13:42, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 22:08, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough and also a skilled steward. RadiX ∞ 18:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 19:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Mifter (talk) 02:04, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough, no issues with actions. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 02:24, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Great work as always :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RadiX

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, gl-1, it-1, sk-1, sq-1, ms-1, hi-1
Personal info: Dear colleagues, this is my second confirmation as a steward, and I can say for sure that it has been a pleasure to be part of this awesome team. I was elected back in 2015 (I am the user who used to go by the name "Ruy Pugliesi").
I have used the steward toolkit for various purposes, although my main effort has continued in the anti-vandalism/sockpuppetry, long-term abuse and spambot management threads (I joined the Small Wiki Monitoring Team in 2010). Apart from that, I have a reasonable bit of action in other different activities: renaming accounts, granting/removing user rights, checkusering/oversighting in small wikis etc. I am reachable via IRC whenever I'm on my laptop, and my availability time to take care of the requests is usually from ~16:00 (UTC) until early in the morning, but it may vary from time to time.
Once again, I would be thrilled to read your comments as well as any input that could help me to improve as a volunteer. If I have your support, I would like to continue serving Wikimedia community in the steward role. Thanks for participating. RadiX ∞

Comments about RadiX

Keep Good. --Vogone (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly active through the entire year and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 14:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. One of most active and proactive stewards. Keep on the mission. EVinente (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 14:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Yeza (talk) 15:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Mvictor ^talk 15:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No issues. —Ah3kal (talk) 17:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and helpful. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 20:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep StevenJ81 (talk) 20:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- MechQuester (talk) 22:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 23:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, valued addition to the team. Sa vh ^ñ 23:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep CasteloBranco^msg 00:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Manter, trusted user. Alex Pereira ^falaê 01:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Thanks for your work on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 04:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep PawełMM (talk) 07:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 11:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Udo T. (talk) 14:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, one of the most active stewards, no concerns regardig his actions — NickK (talk) 14:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 14:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, great steward and nice user :-) Syum90 (talk) 19:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--CreativeC38 (talk) 19:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nungalpiriggal (talk) 21:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --——d—n—f (talk) 07:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 08:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ixocactus (talk) 15:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 22:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:09, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:35, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and competent — billinghurst sDrewth 12:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Archenzo (talk) 16:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Ping08 (talk) 18:06, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 09:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Julle (talk) 16:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Plagiat (talk) 19:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --JustBerry (talk) 07:01, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--AryanSogd ^(t) 17:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 22:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 06:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lepricavark (talk) 19:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. One of the best stewards currently. Thank you for your work. Érico (talk) 02:20, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 02:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:55, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Etamni | ✉ 07:46, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Minoo (talk) 18:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Geoide (talk) 13:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 10:07, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 22:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very active. --Uğurkent^talk 19:03, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:19, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly active, no concerning actions. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 02:24, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Excellent activity levels and work :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:50, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ruslik0

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: ru-N, en-3
Personal info: There has been a really long time since I became a steward. Though these six years passed like a blink of an eye for me. I think that I have been fairly active in almost all areas of stewards' responsibility although my activity shifted from year to year. In the past year I was as always active in the user right management (especially bots) but in addition became more active in the global lock/block requests. I also occasionally replied to checkuser requests, renamed users and was involved in updating the old javascript across many Wikimedia projects. I still think that I and my services will be useful for the Wikimedia community. So, here I politely ask for a re-confirmation and hope that this will be granted. Thank you!

Comments about Ruslik0

Remove I had hoped that Ruslik0 would change their approach after my comments last year, but their problematic approach continues. Note [10] (where it would have been better to move the request to the right section), removal of rights from an editor who obviously ragequit without waiting 24 hours, granting permanent adminship on a brand new wiki, locking a user with a few thousand edits on a wiki where they were not blocked at the time (see commentary here). --Rs chen 7754 14:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, you appear to have some strange opinions about how stewards operate, which is surprising because you were one yourself. The last user was involved in the extensive cross-wiki abuse (a few thousands edits is not a license to do such things) and allowing it to continue was not an option. However I unlocked his account later when he agreed to stop. The user is currently locked though and not by me. I am also not aware of any policy that says that brand new wikis may not elect permanent sysops. If you know one, please, provide a link. In the first case it was a continuation of another discussion and 24h practically expired. So, I am sure that I was right in all three cases. Ruslik (talk) 18:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, trusted user. --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Steinsplitter (talk) 16:52, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree pretty much with Rschen7754, some things are just troublesome. However, Ruslik0 has always been an active steward who got things done. --Vogone (talk) 16:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral While active and usefull in general, there are some concerns (as per Rschen7754) that make me uncomfortable to !vote keep. —Ah3kal (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 20:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 21:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 22:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- MechQuester (talk) 22:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I feel like Ruslik has done more good than what he has done bad, but please be more careful when it comes to your steward actions. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, though please be careful when locking users who are not globally banned and are active contributors to certain projects, for instance by detailing the lock reasons in these potentially controversial cases. Sa vh ^ñ 23:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Not active on Wikiversity since 2015! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep PawełMM (talk) 07:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 11:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good luck--Leon saudanha (talk) 14:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Rschen7754. I have witnessed two serious controversies involving Ruslik's actions this year:
- The first one was regarding AryanSogd's rights removal on tjwiki. It was an obvious ragequit due to conflict between two of the most active local users, I spent time to explain the user what they can do just to discover that Ruslik removed rights without waiting for answer and putting the request on hold. In the end tjwiki lost its most active administrator and the conflict was not resolved.
- The second one was regarding Rusyn Wikipedia case. Ruslik granted admin rights to an obvious sock (created two days ago and used wrong account to sign both on Meta and on local wiki) after an obviously rigged election (changed requirements and local rules during the election, manipulated timestamps). Those were obvious red flags but rights were still granted. When I discovered and reported this, Ruslik overreacted by globally blocking the sock owner KHMELNYTSKYIA even despite good contributions in projects other than Rusyn Wikipedia. After an intervention of a ukwikisource sysop where KHMELNYTSKYIA was one of the few active users he ended up unblocked. The issue is luckily resolved but it was way easier to reject an obviously bad request instead of creating and then resolving a problem
Given that some similar issues were cited last year, I think this becomes a serious problem, hence my vote — NickK (talk) 15:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I was not obvious at that time and I did not overreact. It was a justified lock because in such cases good contributions are irrelevant. Ruslik (talk) 18:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't agree it was not obvious, it was blatantly obvious:
If an account created on 2 January 2017 requests rights on 4 January 2017, the voting obviously lasted less than one week.

If an account created on 2 January 2017 states it applied for admin rights on 2 December 2016, the RfA was obviously riggged.

If an account applies for adminship 7 min after creation, it is almost surely a sock.

If local rules state that a candidate must have one main namespace edit and the candidate does not have even one main namespace edit, it is obviously suspicious, both because rules can't be that simple and a candidate can't be that new.

If a candidate and two first voters had their accounts created within 30 minutes and had no actions on any wiki beyond these votes, they are obviously socks.

One does not need any tools to find out that this is suspicious, just common sense. It should have been checked. It could have been prevented. No checks means anyone can get admin rights and abuse them for the entire month on a small wiki. I don't want stewards let this happen — NickK (talk) 18:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If you have so much free time to check everything for all requests, you can become a steward yourself. But the system here is primary based on trust. We trust users that everything that they say is true. It is called "assume good faith". However when a deception is discovered consequences may be severe. You are actually wrong when you think that the conflict could have been avoided had I discovered the socks earlier. I could have locked his main account anyway. Ruslik (talk) 19:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"If you have so much free time to check everything for all requests, you can become a steward yourself." Regardless of the merits of this, saying something like that is not reflecting the decorum that we expect from stewards. --Rs chen 7754 19:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In a community of volunteers when one volunteer tells another that they should do something it is quite reasonable for the second volunteer to tell the first volunteer that they should do it yourself. Ruslik (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I only partially agree with this. The system is based on trust indeed, but on trust in stewards. Users trust stewards that their actions at least are not obviously wrong. SRP is not based on automatic promotion, many requests end up being rejected. When a user writes "I want to be a sysop, please give me rights on xyzwiki" I expect that stewards will check if this user is really supported by a local community and they followed local rules. I don't expect that stewards will blindly trust anyone: trust, but verify — NickK (talk) 19:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It depends on the request. Short term three months adminships are very easy to get. They are practically given to everyone who applies - local policies are irrelevant here. But at the same time they can be removed at any time by any steward if there are problems. So, it does make sense to invest too much time in them. Ruslik (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This does not work this way. Either someone should regularly check the activity of sysops of various small wikis or a steward should do a very basic check before giving rights.
The first approach does not work. After almost a month of abusing these rights nobody noticed the problem. I am almost sure the user could have kept these rights until the end of the term if he had not tried to write an article about "dumb stewards" in Ukrainian Wikipedia. No bad faith here, a simple fact that nobody cares about what local admins are doing in very small wikis.

Thus the real approach is the second one. Looking through SRP I can actually see that even most basic local requests are put on hold for one week (e.g. Bobbyshabangu@ss.wikipedia), and canvassing (Munirjohn@tgwiktionary) or sockpuppetry (Mogoeilor@lrcwikipedia) as well as non-compliance with local rules (Wintereu@rowikivoyage) were reasons either to put requests on hold or deny them.

That's why your comments surprise me. Surely getting a temporary permission should be easy for an editor in good standing, but a sock should not get sysop rights on a content wiki before their first main namespace edit. If you really think that nobody will do this basic check unless I become a steward (something that does not fit in my plans), that's a serious problem — NickK (talk) 00:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I, of course, oversimplified. There is a procedure to follow and requests are sometimes denied. Ruslik (talk) 10:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Hayordi (talk) 18:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the only ( =( ) Russian-speaking steward. --Brateevsky (talk) 20:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :D — Tursetic 04:04, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Rschen7754 provided some legitimate concerns but that does not give me enough reason to !vote remove. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 09:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 22:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. — Ping08 (talk) 07:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Udo T. (talk) 11:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Krd 11:52, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Michal Lester לסטר (talk) 16:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:19, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Rschen7754 & NickK.--Anatoliy (talk) 20:33, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:38, 11 February 2017 (UTC) I'm not too certain about it, but I don't really see a good reason not to keep you, either. ;)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Howan Hansi (talk) 08:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Although he occasionally can make something wrong, as all of us, he also does a lot of good actions, and the average is quite positive in my opinion.--Syum90 (talk) 10:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:59, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep though I would prefer that editors with high edit counts are banned by the community, rather than summarily blocked by stewards. We need due process, as slow as it can be — billinghurst sDrewth 12:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Rschen and NickK – KPFC 💬 17:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 09:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Arbnos (talk) 19:22, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Plagiat (talk) 20:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Рулин (talk) 20:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Some mistakes but perhaps he will do better this year. Natuur12 (talk) 22:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC) mistakes can always happen[reply]
Remove Lepricavark (talk) 19:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:55, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eraevsky (talk) 10:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Minoo (talk) 18:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:48, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep thanks for your work --Itti (talk) 21:27, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per confidence from other stewards and globalsysops. Quiddity (talk) 22:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I sometimes disagree with certain actions by Ruslik, but usually due to excessive "caution" (e.g. about the role of stewards when local sysops aren't enough). Two locks of a crosswiki abuser with a few thousands edits and of an election manipulator may be good or bad things, I'd need to study more to have an opinion. Nemo 16:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Rschen and NickK. --Uğurkent^talk 19:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think (overall) his contributions are a net positive. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 02:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Although Rschen7754 raised some legit concerns, I am confident that Ruslik will learn from his small mistakes and won't do anything wrong this time around. RadiX ∞ 03:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, with regret. I have always found that Ruslik's work has been invaluable and that he's made sure a lot of less popular area of steward work are properly manned. However, the concerns raised by Rschen7754 are valid and Ruslik's reaction to comments in this discussion has shown a unwillingness to listen to valuable criticism. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 10:00, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Savh

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: es, nl, en-3, fr-1
Personal info:
I've been a steward for 3 years and I would like to continue if the community still trusts me to do so. Clearing spambots has mostly kept me busy over the last year, but I have also assisted with the various noticeboards and attending requests on IRC and OTRS. I also continue helping as part of the Small Wiki Monitoring Team and I assist with the global rename requests.
As most of us, I maintain a RL which can see rather unexpected activity patterns; I will try however, as I did this past year, to continue my activities in what I feel is a useful contribution to the steward team. Please let me know if you have any concerns (and note this can be done all year long on my talk page as well).
Sincerely,
Sa vh ^ñ

Comments about Savh

Keep Trusted, experienced & active. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 14:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Helpful and dedicated. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, buen trabajo/good work. --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ganímedes (talk) 15:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Yeza (talk) 15:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, pretty obvious. No issues at all.—Ah3kal (talk) 16:59, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep They are always willing to handle urgent issues when brought to their attention on IRC Cameron11598 (talk) 17:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and helpful. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 20:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep StevenJ81 (talk) 20:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mbch331 (talk) 21:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 21:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- MechQuester (talk) 22:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 23:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Thanks for your work on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Geagea (talk) 06:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 11:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Udo T. (talk) 13:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Multilingual user doing a great job is a very valuable asset. Forgetting the collisions I had with the user, please keep up your good work. — TBloemink _talk 13:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 14:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, one of the most active stewards, good actions — NickK (talk) 15:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Iooryz (talk) 19:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--CreativeC38 (talk) 19:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, very active and competent.--Syum90 (talk) 19:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 08:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active, hardworking, experienced and sound judgement. —Marco Aurelio 22:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:52, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
strong Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Kippenvlees1 (talk) 15:09, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:19, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Coffins (talk) 18:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:39, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- not active in Wikiversity. Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:59, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep my runner-up for SotY 2016-17 — billinghurst sDrewth 12:43, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Archenzo (talk) 16:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ruthven (talk) 20:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 09:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Druddigon (talk | contributions) 20:09, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Plagiat (talk) 20:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 01:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --JustBerry (talk) 07:04, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Doh. Natuur12 (talk) 22:21, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 06:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lepricavark (talk) 19:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lautaro 97 (talk) 21:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep odder (talk) 02:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Calak (talk) 05:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 08:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 02:44, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:55, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minoo (talk) 18:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sintakso (talk) 19:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Ping08 (talk) 22:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Samuele2002 (talk) 22:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:49, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep thanks for your work --Itti (talk) 21:27, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Geoide (talk) 13:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 10:08, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 22:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Excellent. RadiX ∞ 18:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very active. --Uğurkent^talk 19:19, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Absolutely :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 10:00, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shanmugamp7

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: ta, en-3
Personal info: Hello everyone, this is my third confirmation. I have been fairly active throughout the past year in most of the steward fields, although my activity level slightly decreased compared to the previous years. I would like to continue for yet another year if the community agrees. Questions and feedback are most welcome. Thank you for your consideration. Regards --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 05:30, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Shanmugamp7

Keep Trusted, experienced & active. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good. --Vogone (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 14:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and good. No issues. —Ah3kal (talk) 16:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Cool and level headed. Helpful and always willing to help out on IRC when asked Cameron11598 (talk) 17:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 20:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- MechQuester (talk) 22:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 23:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Valued member of the team. Sa vh ^ñ 23:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Eager Lin (Message) 01:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Thanks for your work on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 11:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 14:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity, no concerns — NickK (talk) 15:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, active and competent.--Syum90 (talk) 19:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 22:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Info-farmer (talk) 08:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ankry (talk) 09:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:52, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:19, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:39, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- not active in Wikiversity. Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:59, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and competent — billinghurst sDrewth 12:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Archenzo (talk) 16:41, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 09:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Plagiat (talk) 20:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --JustBerry (talk) 07:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 22:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lepricavark (talk) 19:08, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Calak (talk) 05:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Active and competent. Érico (talk) 02:03, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:56, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:49, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nan (talk) 08:40, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 10:08, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 22:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very helpful --Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Fully competent steward. RadiX ∞ 18:44, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 19:19, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stryn

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: fi, en-2, sv-1
Personal info:

Hi,
I have served now two terms as a steward, and I would be happy to continue for another term. My cross-wiki activity has dropped a little since the previous term, but I'm still active in many wikis and IRC and I read my mail every day. I consider my home wikis the Finnish Wikipedia, Meta-Wiki and Wikidata, all of which I'm an administrator.
Thank you for your consideration. --Stryn (talk) 19:33, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Stryn

Keep Trusted, experienced & active. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good. --Vogone (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 14:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. Helpful, dedicated and experienced steward. One of the best stewards. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Murma174 (talk) 15:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --SMAUG (Talk – My contributions) 16:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good steward, no concerns at all.—Ah3kal (talk) 16:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 20:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep StevenJ81 (talk) 20:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- MechQuester (talk) 22:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 23:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Valued member of the team. Sa vh ^ñ 23:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Thanks for your work on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 11:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 12:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Udo T. (talk) 14:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Linedwell (talk) 14:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity, no concerns — NickK (talk) 15:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, very active, competent and trustworthy, and also a very nice user :-) Syum90 (talk) 19:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 22:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ankry (talk) 09:44, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 15:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:20, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:39, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —MisterSynergy (talk) 22:51, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 11:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active and competent — billinghurst sDrewth 12:46, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Archenzo (talk) 16:41, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good work. --Palnatoke (talk) 21:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 09:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Julle (talk) 10:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Active, trustworthy, what do I need to say more? — regards, Revi 12:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Plagiat (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --JustBerry (talk) 07:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--AryanSogd ^(t) 17:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 22:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lepricavark (talk) 19:09, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep odder (talk) 02:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Calak (talk) 05:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matěj Suchánek (talk) 20:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep never heard a single complain.--Alexmar983 (talk) 07:45, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:56, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 19:29, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minoo (talk) 18:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:50, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep thanks for your work --Itti (talk) 21:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Geoide (talk) 13:30, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nan (talk) 08:53, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 10:08, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Melquíades (msg) 13:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 22:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Fully competent steward. RadiX ∞ 18:43, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 19:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tegel

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: sv, en-3
Personal info: I have now been a Steward for five years now so this is my fifth confirmation. My activity this year has been similar to previous years with a lot of spam-bots and cross-wiki vandalism. I can often be found on IRC for dealing with emergencies. With your support I would like to continue for another year. -- Tegel _(Talk) 22:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Tegel

Keep Good. --Vogone (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 14:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, active and helpful. No concerns about his activity. --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Murma174 (talk) 15:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Javisst. Stryn (talk) 16:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Would wish to remove just because I hate the message I get will patrolling cvn-sw: "rollback failed: Tegel was here first, you n00b" but jokes aside: good steward, active and available in countervandalism and no other issues. —Ah3kal (talk) 16:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Ah3kal. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 20:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep StevenJ81 (talk) 20:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MechQuester (talk) 22:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 23:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Very active, as always. Sa vh ^ñ 23:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Thanks for your work on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 11:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Udo T. (talk) 13:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 14:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, very active, good actions — NickK (talk) 15:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, absolutely obvious; highly active, hardworking and experienced steward.--Syum90 (talk) 19:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Samuele2002 (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Tursetic 04:05, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Zoizit (talk) 20:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 22:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 15:55, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:20, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Coffins (talk) 18:22, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Definitely! --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 21:09, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Howan Hansi (talk) 08:15, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 11:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep gets best defence award and the most abused — billinghurst sDrewth 12:47, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Archenzo (talk) 16:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 09:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, o.k. --Commander-pirx (talk) 09:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Julle (talk) 09:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Richardkiwi (talk) 15:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Plagiat (talk) 20:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --JustBerry (talk) 07:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 22:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lepricavark (talk) 19:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Calak (talk) 05:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 10:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 02:43, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:56, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minoo (talk) 18:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thank you for your countervandalism work. --Sintakso (talk) 19:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:51, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep thanks for your work --Itti (talk) 21:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Nan (talk) 08:55, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 10:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 22:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Very, very active and skilled. RadiX ∞ 05:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 19:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Great work as always. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teles

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: pt-N, en-3, es-2
Personal info: Hi, everyone. This is going to be my fifth confirmation. I keep working on cross-wiki vandalism control, spam, and detecting long-term abuse. I would like to keep having the privilege of serving community for another year. I had two big losses this year. One of them was the death of my mother. I started editing because of her and her lost also partially carried my will of editing away. I could keep participating as a Steward and that still makes me feel useful. Thanks for participating.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 17:13, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Teles

Keep Not as active as in the past but still active enough. --Rs chen 7754 14:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Nothing bad to appoint. Still is an important steward, especially in the pt.wiki. EVinente (talk) 14:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, activity is ok. --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Mvictor ^talk 15:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No concerns, I hope for more activity. No other issues.—Ah3kal (talk) 16:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 20:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Chico Venancio (talk) 21:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 22:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MechQuester (talk) 22:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 23:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I understand the difficult times you've been going through, and wish you the best for this year. Sa vh ^ñ 23:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course! CasteloBranco^msg 23:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Geobage (talk) 00:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Manter, of course. Alex Pereira ^falaê 01:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Not active on Wikiversity since 2013! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 11:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 14:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 15:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, reasonable activity, no concerns — NickK (talk) 15:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, very competent and experienced.--Syum90 (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 08:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Winter^eu 10:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ixocactus (talk) 15:12, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zoizit (talk) 20:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 22:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 15:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:20, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Experienced and wise user. Gonçalo Veiga (talk) 08:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- not active in Wikiversity. Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 11:02, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep \o/ — billinghurst sDrewth 12:48, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hasive • talk • 12:51, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Archenzo (talk) 16:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 09:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Plagiat (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course! Taivo (talk) 13:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 22:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lepricavark (talk) 19:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lautaro 97 (talk) 21:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course. --Meno25 (talk) 10:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 21:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Active, trusted and friendly. No concerns. Érico (talk) 02:15, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 02:42, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:56, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Minoo (talk) 18:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep I want to thank you for having the courage to be gone on your way even with this unpleasant affair for which there are no words. (Sorry if my English is not good but I hope that the concept there is understood) --Samuele2002 (talk) 22:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:51, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 10:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 22:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 04:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep My condolences to you. I wish you will a little more active. --Uğurkent^talk 19:31, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Excellent work as always. I am really sorry to hear about your mother's passing :( Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trijnstel

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
Personal info: Hi everyone,
Due to personal circumstances (such as accepting a full-time job and the loss of two dear family members) I wasn't as active as steward as I sometimes wished. Therefore I thought a lot about whether I want to continue with this volunteer work in 2017, since the situation in my private life hasn't changed that much. But I decided to give it a shot and continue for one more year. I care about the wikis too much and I believe I'm still active enough. Plus as a steward I also believe I provide valuable insights, at least to some.
What I do: work involving right changes, cross-wiki vandalism, sockpuppetry and spam. I'm an admin on three major wikis, a CU on two and I'm an OTRS agent. I'm far from perfect, which means I'm always open for feedback. Since Shanel left us in 2012 I'm the only female steward, though perhaps it's now the last time I have to say this.
Thanks for your consideration.
Yours, Trijnstel_talk 14:53, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Trijnstel

Remove Sorry but i expect moor activity from a steward. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good. --Vogone (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not as active as in the past, but I feel the behind the scenes work (list administration) makes a difference here. --Rs chen 7754 14:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 14:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. EVinente (talk) 14:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no reason to remove. Her actions are ok and I see no reason to oppose. --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mvictor ^talk 15:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Yeza (talk) 15:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I consider that your activity is sufficient and can continue to serve as steward. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good steward. Hope to resume activity but no concerns and no other issues.—Ah3kal (talk) 16:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep please go on --Bjarlin (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very capable and helpful - Kippenvlees1 (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 20:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Elvesham (talk) 20:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Freaky Fries (talk) 20:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mbch331 (talk) 21:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 21:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep TheDragonhunter (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Excellent steward. WJBscribe (talk) 21:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MechQuester (talk) 22:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - no objection, trusted --Rax (talk) 22:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 23:13, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Trijnstel is a valued asset to the steward team. Sa vh ^ñ 23:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC
Manter trusted Alex Pereira ^falaê 01:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - Not active on Wikiversity since 2014! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Grasmat (talk) 09:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 11:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have never had any trouble working with Trijnstel and find her a valuable asset on the steward team. Please keep up the good work. — TBloemink _talk 13:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good luck in your new year of Steward work :-)--Leon saudanha (talk) 14:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good activity behind the scenes like list/CU wiki administration. This is not very visible but valuable — NickK (talk) 15:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, i've known her as a good admin and steward with insightful comments on complex issues. Iooryz (talk) 19:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--CreativeC38 (talk) 19:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, very competent, trustworthy and helpful, great steward. Also a very nice user :-) Syum90 (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Woodwalker_talk 02:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ilonamay (talk) 09:44, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 22:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Very strong Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 15:58, 11 February 2017 (UTC) Simply the best[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:20, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Cirdan (talk) 19:03, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Howan Hansi (talk) 08:14, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- in my opinion too much hats in too much projects. Marcus Cyron (talk) 10:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 11:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep every team needs a Dutch female to whip them into line, where would this team be without you? — billinghurst sDrewth 12:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 16:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Archenzo (talk) 16:43, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good work. --Palnatoke (talk) 21:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 09:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – JurriaanH (talk) 14:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - --Richardkiwi (talk) 14:59, 13 February 2017 (UTC) too many notes in her singing[reply]
Keep Good work. Taivo (talk) 19:10, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove task reduction recommended --Plagiat (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- up the good work. --Stunteltje (talk) 21:21, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --JustBerry (talk) 07:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 22:23, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 07:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep --AFBorchert (talk) 10:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:35, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lepricavark (talk) 19:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep odder (talk) 02:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pro @xqt 13:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Active, experienced and very competent. Her work on checkuserwiki is valuable, and I thanks for that. Érico (talk) 02:08, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --- Darwin ^Ahoy! 02:41, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:49, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --İncelemeelemani (talk) 12:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Minoo (talk) 18:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Samuele2002 (talk) 19:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:52, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep thanks for your work --Itti (talk) 21:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--L736E (talk) 18:35, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 10:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --WeeJeeVee (talk) 14:37, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 22:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and helpful: does a lot of stuff from behind the scenes. RadiX ∞ 04:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Not active enough. --Uğurkent^talk 19:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Great activity levels on IRC, and I'm sure great work behind the scenes as has always been the case. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vituzzu

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2017 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: …
Personal info: Each year I try to write down a yearly balance of stewards' activity/my own activity. I'll start with cons: this year we lost/we are about to lose some important fellow steward. This brought (IMHO) to weakening our ability to work as a team. And, as a consequence, to react to non-ordinary challenges we have to face. Also, we still lacks of some technical instrument like better ways to handle spam or the ability to whitelist IPs caught in global blocks (this will truly reduce my personal workload). As pros: I don't know if it was a consequence of global renaming requests or wikidata moving a large number of users to global projects but I feel like the overall wiki* community is getting more and more aware of global roles/issues/activities. Also, I think we are reacting in the right way to an Internet which is moving to mobile platforms though this still is a challenge. This year I was able to have a fair level of timely responses though I hope I'll be able to find a way to improve block messages using ad hoc localized templates. I seek confirmation because I think I can still be somehow useful to the project(s), I use to give precedence to substance over form, though I accept recalls to do not completely ignore the first one. I just hope we will have the strength and commitment to accept new challenges without ignoring them. My main working areas will remain lta "management", open proxies/botnets detection and checkusering.

Comments about Vituzzu

Keep, good steward. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly active through the entire year and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 14:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep essential--Shivanarayana (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 14:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose He thinks he's above the rules (he broke a policy in order to evaluate a vote/"discussion" in a way he personally wanted - See [11]). He also thinks that banning a user who did no harm to the project at all is not a harassment. Vituzzu helps harassing users on some small projects. --Auvajs (talk) 14:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 14:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep, good steward. --Ks-M9 ^[disc.] 14:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep good to go! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Rodrigodacuna (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Yeza (talk) 15:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Euphydryas (msg) 15:23, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 15:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lenka64 (talk) 16:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose 1) too much blocks of inocent contributors, 2) biased against some users, 3) slandering, 4) supports undermining Wikimedia principles and dictatorships.--Juandev (talk) 16:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Juandev: Have any diffs to back this up? Cameron11598 (talk) 17:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - 1) Well you can see it in the logs and many complains on his discussion page here on meta. I wonder how many are those, who havent complained and just left the project. Of course to fight vandalism is very difficult, but Wikimadia movment is not in the state of being able to loose volunteers. 2) I am sorry, I dont have a time to look for all of those diffs, nor collecting them to the database, but the last example of this behaviour could be seen in his statements here. 3) also at the previous link, 4) if he is vary active in showing a supporting of people, who are in conflict of interest and who are accused from udermaning projects, he is a supporter of that. His statements are very close to lies (see the previous links). The last support of these conflict individuals could be seen also on the previous link, where his behaviour is even criticized by other stewards. Deffinitely the person who is in the interest of conflict, whould not be the one to close request in favour of the persons, he supports.--Juandev (talk) 18:09, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no concerns, good and active steward. —Ah3kal (talk) 16:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep one of the best we have. And regarding what Juandev states. Links or it didn't happen. Natuur12 (talk) 17:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems level headed, and competent with the tools. Cameron11598 (talk) 17:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Nungalpiriggal (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Chansey (talk) 17:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course. – Ajraddatz (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 18:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pracchia-78 (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY 20:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bookvaedina (talk) 21:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DCB (talk) 21:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lepido (talk) 21:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mr-Shadow (talk) 21:45, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MechQuester (talk) 22:17, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - for sure --Rax (talk) 22:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - εΔ ω 23:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC) Salutamu!
Keep Valued steward, takes difficult decisions when needed. Sa vh ^ñ 23:12, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 23:14, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — regards, Revi 23:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Yiyi (talk) 23:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Iazyges (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Thanks for your work on Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Geagea (talk) 06:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Aplasia (talk) 08:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for getting rid of the vandals! --Ruthven (talk) 08:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 09:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 11:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Umberto NURS (msg) 11:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — TBloemink _talk 13:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Udo T. (talk) 14:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Leon saudanha (talk) 14:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Excellent activity and reasonable actions (and sorry you got involved in the long Czech conflict) — NickK (talk) 16:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep, highly active, competent and trustworthy, great steward.--Syum90 (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Woodwalker_talk 02:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Efficient activity, as far as I can tell. --——d—n—f (talk) 07:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Good work! Taivo (talk) 08:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --НУРшЯGIO^{(beware of the moose)} 17:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 22:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. — Ping08 (talk) 07:50, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 11:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eumolpo (πῶς λέγεις; = che vuoi dire?) 14:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Klaas `Z4␟` V: 16:03, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --თოგო ^(D) 21:41, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 05:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Howan Hansi (talk) 08:13, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 11:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep competent, active, though can be heavy-handed — billinghurst sDrewth 12:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Archenzo (talk) 16:05, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Ghilt (talk) 20:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Dome ^{A disposizione!} 23:49, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lucas (talk) 04:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gridditsch (talk) 09:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stryn (talk) 09:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Diligent enough. — regards, Revi 12:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Plagiat (talk) 20:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Tchoř (talk) 22:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Kal-El ^{drop me a line!} 23:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --JustBerry (talk) 06:53, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--AryanSogd ^(t) 17:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Fernando.tassone (talk) 21:35, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 06:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep, Ζήτω η Καλαβρία ελληνική !! ----KoriAna 1 (talk) 12:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk) 17:36, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lepricavark (talk) 19:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 19:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matěj Suchánek (talk) 20:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --TJH2018 talk 22:28, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 08:56, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --İncelemeelemani (talk) 12:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good--Geoide (talk) 17:40, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Barras talk 17:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eraevsky (обс.) 13:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Neutral --Minoo (talk) 18:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Samuele2002 (talk) 19:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thank you for your countervandalism work. --Sintakso (talk) 19:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 21:53, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Harlock81 (talk) 12:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep thanks for your work --Itti (talk) 21:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Шухрат Саъдиев (talk) 13:29, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alex brollo (talk) 23:34, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--L736E (talk) 18:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Melquíades (msg) 09:36, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --rxy (talk) 10:10, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 22:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Everybody does appreciate your efforts on the countervandalism thread. Thanks for your time. RadiX ∞ 04:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:19, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 19:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 22:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Certamente. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 09:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]