Stewards/Confirm/2016

These steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

The 2016–17 Confirmation will begin on February 8, and will finish on February 28th.

The 2016–17 Steward Confirmations are a good opportunity to check if we are still happy with our current stewards. To make the process as smooth as possible, here is how things are organized.

To comment, please log in with an account that has edits (on any wiki) before February 1st 2016. During the 2016 Elections, please mention if you are comfortable or unhappy with the use of steward tools of any of the people listed below and why.

After the election, stewards (including the newly-elected ones) are invited to review the confirmation comments and to give their impression of the outcome (consensus to confirm/remove etc.) on Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2016 for every steward who stood for confirmation. Of course, they are not required to do this for every candidate and will be especially careful to do it regarding someone about whom they expressed strong opinions in the confirmation. Non-steward comments are welcome outside of the "Final Decision" section, subject to the usual expectations of civility. Confirmation discussions will last one week after the appointment of the newly elected stewards. This may be extended to two weeks for one or more confirmations at the discretion of the Election Committee if the committee believes further input is required before concluding. The Election Committee will close these discussions and implement the outcome (which also means making a decision in non-obvious cases).

All stewards elected before February 2016 will undergo this process.

Ajraddatz

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en-N, fr-2
Personal info: Hello everyone. It's been a privilege to serve the community as a steward over the last two years, and I would be glad to continue on in this role with your approval. Over the last year I have focused on cross-wiki work, particularly counter-spam and vandalism removal. I have also been active answering requests on the steward requests pages and the OTRS queue. I still have time and energy to devote to steward work, and will remain active in this role over the next year if confirmed. Any questions / comments / concerns are welcomed and appreciated. Thanks, Ajraddatz (talk) 01:04, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Ajraddatz

Keep, good steward. --Vogone (talk) 14:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 1989. COOL BEANS! 16:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 17:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 18:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Highly active through the entire year and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 19:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. HakanIST (talk) 19:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for your good work. Miniapolis 20:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Euphydryas (msg) 21:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Vogone. Riley Huntley (talk) 21:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Keep I heard all good about this guy, so lets keep it.--Juandev (talk) 21:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kurtis (talk) 22:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - fulfils my activity levels benchmark :) ..--Ste moc 00:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 03:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per statement and activity level. — T. 06:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I don't know anything about your steward work, but I see that you've already stopped to contribute to the Wikimedia projects. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Danny B. 07:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep eurodyne (talk) 08:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 13:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good participant, collaborative — billinghurst sDrewth 13:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the best few stewards. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good steward, active and helpful — NickK (talk) 15:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Epìdosis 16:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eumolpo (πῶς λέγεις; = che vuoi dire?) 16:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with regards from VINCENZO1492 17:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 19:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 21:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Beneficial volunteered steward. --Allen ^{(talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me)} 04:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zerabat (discusión) 15:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC) Active and good steward activity. [reply]
Keep--Shivanarayana (talk) 15:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 00:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Itti (talk) 09:12, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted user. --Jan Kovář^BK (talk) 18:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 23:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ghilt (talk) 08:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Knowledgeable. –Ejs-80 16:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good cross-wiki record. --Snaevar (talk) 17:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sane, trusted. – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 22:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Devwebtel ^(query) 14:10, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
KeepPokestarFan (talk) (My Contribs) 01:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Green Giant (talk) 01:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 08:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ✒ Bennylin 04:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep BeeCeePhoto (talk) 12:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 20:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 18:57, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Wpollard (talk) 07:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for unclear language skill.--Jusjih (talk) 00:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've been a steward for two years. How have my language skills impacted my performance in this role? There should be more than enough examples to choose from. You also voted to keep me last year, and my language skills haven't changed since then. Ajraddatz (talk) 01:01, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please enter your language skills in time so this will not happen again. I am too busy even when no longer a steward.--Jusjih (talk) 01:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I see. So, despite being active and helpful in the role for a year, you think I should be removed because I forgot to put a few characters in my statement? That's your choice I suppose. Ajraddatz (talk) 01:45, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Has contributed to en.Wikiversity within a year! --Marshallsumter (talk) 16:04, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No reason not to. Does good work and is active. :-) Trijnstel_talk 21:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--Muzammil (talk) 08:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 15:57, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Friendly, helpful and active enough. ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:36, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 17:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Keep - A clearly helpful and active fellow steward! -Barras talk 18:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nice person, active and giving insightful comments on steward related discussions --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 19:56, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 01:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 15:43, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 17:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 22:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Super --Timk70 question? 21:43, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 13:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I know Ajraddatz as very helpful and engaged steward. einsbor _talk 08:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
KeepKapçak (talk) 19:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DARIO SEVERI (talk) 23:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 01:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:16, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep active enough --Biplab Anand (Talk) 17:24, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and helpful. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:49, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Quiddity (talk) 18:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very active steward, almost always around. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Avraham

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en, he-2
Personal info: It is again with pleasure that I note that the steward body has been able to support the Wikimedia family of projects. I once again request of you the privilege and opportunity to continue to serve Wikimedia as a steward. With my term on the m:Ombudsman commission coming to a close, I look forward to returning to checkuser and oversight duties together with permissions. As always, I appreciate your collective trust in allowing me this opportunity, and I hope to continue to be worthy of your trust in the coming year.

Comments about Avraham

Remove concerns about activity. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--6AND5 (talk) 15:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)>[reply]
Keep perhaps he will be more active next year since he is no longer an OC-member. Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Natuur12. RadiX ∞ 15:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Responded to concerns about activity by being more active, and by stepping down from the OC this next year. --Rs chen 7754 15:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Polimerek (talk) 16:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove concerns about neutrality -- Severino (talk) 17:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Severino: this is a serious allegation, which incident(s) are you referring to? --Vituzzu (talk) 14:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at Severino's edits at the English Wikipedia it becomes awfully clear to me that he has a bias regarding Israel and Africa related topics so I figure this has something to do with having different opinions in this topic. See also his vote here whixh is only one of 2 votes he has ever made at the English Wikipedia. Also note that he made the same unmotivated vote before and his other opposes / remove votes (his only votes) are made against Hebrew speaking users. Natuur12 (talk) 18:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. Next year I should remember to pretend I can speak some Hebrew then, just for testing purposes. --Vituzzu (talk) 18:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the initial rendering: I remember comments of Avraham regarding the "CAMERA" campaign (2008), after the cover of the group was blown. And I remember having an edit conflict with him. Hence the DOUBTS. But actually I don't have to justify myself for my voting behavior. What is problematic here, is not my voting but your handling with it, your comments. Your attacks and accusations tell nothing about me - but a lot about you, and your standards. You only "analyze" MY voting and edits, comment only MY dissentient vote here (according to your allegations, my voting is "unmotivated" and/or motivated by the fact that candidates declare to speak hebrew...) - you show YOUR bias. I could also examine your edits, comments and votes for racial/religious/... aspects and bitch about it then. I understood that one of you two is steward and the other admin. Read WP:ASPERSION, WP:BULL ("False accusations are a common form of bullying on Wikipedia, although people do sometimes make honest mistakes. Accusations of misconduct made without evidence are considered a serious personal attack"), and WP:APR (Avoid personal remarks); and probably there are also guidelines regarding the voting rights on wikimedia which are relevant here.--Severino (talk) 10:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing tangible then? Just a pile of half-fluff? --Vituzzu (talk) 16:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Said he would become more active, became more active. Thanks for your continuing commitment to the role! Ajraddatz (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, hoping that activity will increase without OC obligations. Miniapolis 21:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Keep When he's around, he's a big help. Kurtis (talk) 22:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - every year he claims he would become active, he doesn't.. --Ste moc 01:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Can't say I noticed much of Avraham. --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Most great! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted and hoping for more activity next in the next year. — T. 06:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Less and less present. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep hoping that the activity does occur post OC — billinghurst sDrewth 13:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Billinghurst. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I understand that OC can take quite a lot of time, thus I would give a chance to increase activity this year — NickK (talk) 15:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eumolpo (πῶς λέγεις; = che vuoi dire?) 16:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Steinsplitter--DCB (talk) 17:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Billinghurst.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove He isn't very active. --Uğurkent^talk 19:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gue rillero 05:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mvictor ^talk 18:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -- per Steinsplitter - Richardkiwi (talk) 20:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Billinghurst too. Érico (talk) 00:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I trust this user. Altamel (talk) 18:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 23:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Should have more time this time around, good faith keep! --Charitwo (talk) 18:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove has contributed to few wikis compared to other stewards.--Snaevar (talk) 18:14, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 23:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Green Giant (talk) 01:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support worthy steward.--AryanSogd 11:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ✒ Bennylin 04:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 20:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Vadgt (talk) 01:41, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Steinsplitter--CaZeRillo (talk) 09:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Eleven contributions to Wikiversities is good but none to en.wikiversity in the past years. --Marshallsumter (talk) 16:09, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Might be less active, but is still valuable and around when you need him. Trijnstel_talk 22:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 15:59, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Wikitanvir, trusted and around. ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove As per Auvajs. --Kusurija (talk) 20:30, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--KTo288 (talk) 16:45, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - A helpful steward who will hopefully now be able to spend more time as steward as he's no longer on the OC. -Barras talk 18:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Barras, hoping to see more activity --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 19:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active enough, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 15:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 17:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 04:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:51, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep while Avi is not the most active steward, he is active and his contribution to the steward team have been very valuable. He is a keen mediator and is always ready to offer advice when the opportunity arises. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is not good by others to put so much pressure on volunteers forcing them to work more, more, more and to never have a break. That is a form of harassment and damages our project. --.js^{[democracy needed]} 13:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Barras

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: en-4, de
Personal info: It's been five years since I've been made a steward. Since then I've been more or less active, depending on my real life. While I was more active during my first years of services, I think I maintained a good level of activity in the more recent years. I'm daily available on IRC to help whenever help is needed. For urgent matters (like oversight requests), I'm available at really any time of the day by mail. In the past year, I served as a member of the Ombudsmen Commission and was asked if I'd like to serve for another term, which I'm now doing. I think I managed both roles adequately and got them not conflicted, which means there is no problem for me to do both jobs for another year if the community is willing to support me again. As always, if you've questions, just ask. I'm happy to answer them.

Comments about Barras

Remove, for the sole reason of me being opposed to the steward-OC double role. Controversial actions can always happen, even unexpectedly, and making people feel uncomfortable reporting possible issues with current OC members is certainly not what we want. --Vogone (talk) 14:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support trusted. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course! Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't generally support the steward/OC combination due to workload concerns, but in this case Barras was able to maintain an acceptable level of activity, likely helped by stepping down from some of their other Wikimedia roles. As far as my concerns last year I am disappointed that they never responded publicly or privately to the concerns but I am not aware of any further issues and am thus not factoring that in this year. --Rs chen 7754 15:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Brainswiffer (talk) 16:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Agruwie (talk) 16:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Emergency doc (talk) 16:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep he is a good Steward.--BRP^ever 17:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Infinite0694 (Talk) 17:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alan ^(talk) 18:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. HakanIST (talk) 19:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Rschen7754. Miniapolis 21:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Rschen7754. Riley Huntley (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Keep--White Master (e s) 23:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 00:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - per Vogone, sorry but one should be neutral and as a steward he has access to stuff Ombudsman's should not...Good steward but he should not hold onto both rights..--Ste moc 01:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - One of my go-to stewards. Osiris (talk) 03:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kindly for me, yeah! --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep His OC membership does not concern me. He is good and active enough in his steward role which should get importance here. — T. 06:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Andreas Werle (talk) 06:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I wish you were more active now. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should visit the user's page at SimpleWiki. Etamni | ✉ 10:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — Danny B. 07:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep eurodyne (talk) 08:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- All these hats and yet still manages to make simple edits and fight vandalism too! This one's a keeper! Etamni | ✉ 10:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep need wise heads, managed the OC role fine — billinghurst sDrewth 13:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Laberinto16 (talk) 13:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I have no concerns with OC/steward double role as soon as a steward clearly understands the conflict and remains active, which is the case here — NickK (talk) 15:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk) 16:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Luke 081515 16:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with regards from VINCENZO1492 17:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral He should be more active. --Uğurkent^talk 19:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Yeza (talk) 20:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- No concerns about acting as a steward and OC simultaneously. Sufficiently active; extraordinarily helpful. -- Avi (talk) 21:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 00:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep to offset the bizarre opposes --Gue rillero 05:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bizarre? It even used to be WMF practice not to allow this until a few years ago. --Vogone (talk) 00:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mvictor ^talk 18:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Bernard (talk) 20:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 00:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--- Darwin ^Ahoy! 01:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ok —Ah3kal (talk) 07:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Itti (talk) 09:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --BeverlyHillsCop (talk) 23:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 23:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It is my pleasure to work with Barras at Simple Wikipedia. Always careful, courteous and a good watchkeeper from vandals (of which we seem to have many). Fylbecatulous talk 17:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trustworthy imo.--Snaevar (talk) 17:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trustworthy. The dual-role issue shold be resolved on a policy page not a confirmation page. – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 23:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Devwebtel ^(query) 14:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per NickK. Green Giant (talk) 01:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trusted. --Rus793 (talk) 02:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thank you for the competent and quick help lately. Good luck! --GeoTrinity (talk) 13:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 23:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Five years of valuable works, and many more to come. ✒ Bennylin 04:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove For the only reason being S and OC at the same time. Fine otherwise. — regards, Revi 07:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good work as a steward, trusted // JFTR: bit week suport because of: I'm really not lucky with this double-role-thing of you being steward AND OC-Member :-( — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rax (talk) -Barras talk 10:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Taichi - (あ！) 06:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Per Vogone and Revi. odder (talk) 13:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Microchip08 (talk) 15:49, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 20:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Berlin-George (talk) 01:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone --CaZeRillo (talk) 09:25, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
KeepBecause of your service at Simple English Wikipedia. PokestarFan (talk) (My Contribs) 13:48, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Contributions to Wikiversities - 32, but none to en.Wikiversity since 2012! --Marshallsumter (talk) 16:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Without a doubt. Fully trust him and also a less active Barras is a useful Barras for us. :-) Trijnstel_talk 22:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for opposing 3 proposals at Requests for comment/Removal of bureaucrats in small wikis.--Jusjih (talk) 01:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Jusjih: Stewards are, as far as I know, still allowed to express their opinion on votes, without being asked to be removed because you don't agree with them. I find it surprisingly narrowsighted coming from an ex-steward. Sa vh ^ñ 13:16, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Savh: I disagree you as I have even received even worse or irrelevant comments when I was a steward. This page is comment about Barras, not you.--Jusjih (talk) 00:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trusted. --Antigng (talk) 08:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove For his short-sighted remarks and pro-vandalism attitude. He first accused me of being a sockpuppet of Abbas Dothar. When disproved in a CU, he went on to make hue and cry over a chat-post, overlooking the comments across Hindi and English Wikipedias such as here over the use IPs and Wikipedia accounts to promote a mediocre poet. I wonder the dual role he will discharge in the days to come!!--Muzammil (talk) 08:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Context and more info to those who are not aware: User talk:Barras#Clarification. -Barras talk 13:06, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 16:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Friendly, helpful and active enough. ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sufficiently active, helpful and good steward :)--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 20:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Marco Aurelio 15:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove steward/ oc role resign for one or the other --DerekvG (talk) 17:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
active, helpful on IRC. tufor (talk) 19:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Elmie (talk 20:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for opposing 3 proposals at Requests for comment/Removal of bureaucrats in small wikis. --Holder (talk) 19:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:18, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 04:59, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Quiddity (talk) 18:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Barras has been handling the steward / OC double role well, so that's not an issue for me. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:54, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep while I don't particularly like the double role, I think Barras does fine work in his steward capacity and think the steward team benefits from his efforts. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

bennylin

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: id, en, jv, zh-3
Personal info: Hi all, sorry for not able to make the statements on time due to traveling to the states, and home just for the Chinese New Year yesterday. I still wishes to remain as an active stewards so that I could continue the work that I've done in the previous years. My statement and position has not changed from previous years, and that is to make the WMF projects to be as safe as possible from vandals, spammers, abusers. While this year saw a reduction of time I could committed to the steward tasks, but nonetheless I try to online at IRC and elsewhere as much as possible, so for this year I would also like your support for another year of serving this community. Salam. ✒ Bennylin 08:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about bennylin

Remove Unfortunately did not manage to create a statement on time. --Vogone (talk) 14:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral but will change to remove if no explenation is provided why he didn't create a statement. Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - though, activity is a concern, it is not enough of a concern to vote remove. Natuur12 (talk) 20:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral At least he created the page and was active, but no statement doesn't leave a good impression. --Rs chen 7754 15:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep I feel that low activity has been a persistent issue here but not enough to vote remove. --Rs chen 7754 19:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral ~~Waiting for the statement.~~ RadiX ∞ 17:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Has provided a reasonable statement and wishes to keep helping out. Activity level is ok indeed. RadiX ∞ 19:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per Vogone. --Alan ^(talk) 18:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Alan ^(talk) 07:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone. Armbrust (talk) 19:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Vogone. Willing to change to keep if decent explanation provided as to why no statement was made. Jsharpminor (talk) 20:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, pending a statement. Miniapolis 21:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Oppose No --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Doesn't seem to be any issues with Bennylin, but the lack of a statement seems to suggest that they're not really that interested in retaining the advanced permissions. Kurtis (talk) 22:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose--White Master (e s) 23:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove SQL ^{Query me!} 00:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove has been inactive for over 2 and a half years..--Ste moc 01:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per inactivity. Riley Huntley (talk) 01:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactivity --Az1568 (talk) 02:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove no statement, either busy or not interested? --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Moral keep Please write your statements quickly. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Was never very active as a steward and this time, no statement as well. — T. 06:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactivity --Ochloese (talk) 08:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Appreciations for all the service so far. --Meracritus (talk) 11:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per a number above --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no reason to remove, though you set your own public face — billinghurst sDrewth 13:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep now that statement is made. Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove inactivity. jni (talk) 16:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the statement is already there, user was reasonably active and there were no concerns last year — NickK (talk) 16:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think, diversity within stewards is very important. --►Cekli 829 16:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good steward, though the delay in creating the statement is a bit concerning. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per above. --Uğurkent^talk 19:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--DCB (talk) 21:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough, very helpful when around, necessary language skills, all of which combine to my belief that he will continue to contribute and be a net positive to the steward corps. -- Avi (talk) 21:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Avi. --Liang(WMTW) (talk) 03:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 00:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mind explaining it a little bit more? ✒ Bennylin 04:40, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep INeverCry 23:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ryan Ajie (talk) 06:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trustworthy imo, adds indonesian language to the pool of languages that stewards can are fluent in.--Snaevar (talk) 18:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Language and cultural skills from this individual are vital for the diversity of stewards :JarrahTree (talk) 12:28, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because it isn't important that the statement was late. Green Giant (talk) 01:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Please create your statement on time next year. Matanya (talk) 18:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 07:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Matanya :) Pundit (talk) 18:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There is no excuse for not creating a statement, in my opinion. The date of the Confirmations is known beforehand, so something can be prepared. --MF-W 22:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Never been convinced this blanket process was in any way necessary, so if all we can say about Bennylin is that the statement was late in coming, then I find no objection. Courcelles 20:59, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per activity --CaZeRillo (talk) 09:26, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --GeoTrinity (talk) 18:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Seven contributions to Wikiversities is good, but none since 2013 is bad! --Marshallsumter (talk) 16:20, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Anyone can be busy; he is active enough based on the inactivity policy and - even though a bit late - created a statement. Trijnstel_talk 22:21, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 16:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The more the merrier. Activity dip is no concern. We need more people. MORE PEOPLE!!! :) --Pratyeka (talk) 06:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Highly responsive (to me), created the statement in like the same minute I sent him a message. A little more activity surely wouldn't hurt. However, his language skills are also important to the whole team, imo. It simply also can happen, that you can't be on-time to create the statement. It's not really good, but it can happen. We all are human. -Barras talk 18:23, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep somewhat active. Language skills are useful--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 20:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active enough, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The nom statement flub nonwithstanding.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - It bugs me a bit that, despite the spam we received to create our statements from the electcom, you have not managed to create yours in time. On the other hand, asking for removal for this single incident looks a bit extreme to me and a justification was provided, although I understand the community opinions above me that perhaps more activity is expected. Overall, I think Bennylin does a good job so I'd prefer if he stayed with us, but with a bit more of activity. Thanks. —Marco Aurelio 15:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Can't decide my mind.--DangSunM (talk) 20:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no evidence of missuse, active enough to keep I think, but most important reason: usefull language skills —Ah3kal (talk) 09:07, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per MarcoAurelio but I believe it's a good idea to have a good steward like him. ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:18, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Timk70 question? 21:45, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No one is perfect. A little tardy is nothing. Plus, we need someone who knows Chinese like him! Nguyentrongphu (talk) 01:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove But his Chinese is poor, I think.--Lt2818 (talk) 08:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:18, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Linguistic skills are usefull, and no one should be forbidden to have a real life. --La femme de menage (talk) 09:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Trijnstel. --Bonaditya (talk) 01:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 04:59, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep while disappointing that bennylin was not able to put forward a statement, I think he does good work as a steward and his language skill are a definitive asset to the team. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While he was not very active during the past year, his continuation as a steward will still be a net positive. This will increase the diversity of stewards as a group – we have few stewards from Asia. Ruslik (talk) 11:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ~Cybularny ^Speak? 13:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --.js^{[democracy needed]} 13:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bsadowski1

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages:
Personal info: I have been a steward for about 5 years and would like to continue working with my fellow stews and handle crosswiki issues and tasks.

Comments about Bsadowski1

Keep, ok. --Vogone (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Still active and fighting LTAs and I'm shocked by the neutrals. --Rs chen 7754 15:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The LTA hunter! ;) RadiX ∞ 16:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Infinite0694 (Talk) 17:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove with sincere thanks for service. Five years is long enough, we should give Bsadowski the opportunity to pursue other interests. LavaBaron (talk) 18:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Rschen7754. Armbrust (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Riley Huntley (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 21:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Druddigon (talk | contributions) 21:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Keep Good user --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why not?--White Master (e s) 23:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - unlike most enwiki admin/steward, he handles the job well instead of favouring his home wiki..--Ste moc 01:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Can't remember any interactions. --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Always seems to be around when you need him. Osiris (talk) 03:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Ah3kal (talk) 06:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the quietly active stewards I have seen so far. — T. 06:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Danny B. 07:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep eurodyne (talk) 08:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Not active enough any more on wiki projects. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 08:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Etamni | ✉ 10:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep every team needs a goofy (blink blink). Manages a couple of our major vandals with aplomb. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep rxy (talk)
Keep, good activity and no concerns — NickK (talk) 16:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with regards from VINCENZO1492 17:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 19:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 21:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Érico (talk) 00:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I can hardly remember an LTA sockmaster who hasn't trolled him. INeverCry 23:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -jkb- 08:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep experienced, but should be more active imho.--Snaevar (talk) 17:45, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Charitwo (talk) 17:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Green Giant (talk) 01:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Henryk Borawski (talk) 08:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 12:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 18:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--GZWDer (talk) 19:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 23:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ✒ Bennylin 04:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Chenzw (talk) 04:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Microchip08 (talk) 15:49, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Courcelles 21:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Matiia (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Contributions to Wikiversities - 86 (good), but none to en.wikiversity since 2013 (bad)! --Marshallsumter (talk) 16:27, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep What would we be without him? Trijnstel_talk 22:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove for unclear language skill.--Jusjih (talk) 01:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 16:05, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sure. ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:34, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - active and helpful steward. However, I've to admit that I would've liked to read more than one short sentence as statement. ;-) -Barras talk 18:25, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active and helpful and always available on IRC--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 20:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Trusted, active, does good work. - Taketa (talk) 10:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Effective fighter of troublemakers and LTAs so it seems like.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:57, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and appoint as Wikimedia Sheriff for all the level of vandalism and LTAs he manage to stop. —Marco Aurelio 15:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DerekvG (talk) 17:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DangSunM (talk) 20:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pablo000 (talk) 16:32, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Timk70 question? 21:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 13:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --DARIO SEVERI (talk) 23:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quiddity (talk) 18:54, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Agree with MarcoAurelio. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very active stewards, no concerns whatsoever. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 07:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DerHexer

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2016 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>

English:

Languages: de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1
Personal info: After a turbulent start in the ElectCom with different understandings of Steward confirmations, stewards together with WMF, global renamers, and many more supporters could accomplish the SUL finalization much smoother than expected (see lego’s presentation at Wikimania). Despite years of preparation and hundreds of helping hands (see my last confirmation statement), the forcible rename of millions of accounts as a unique invasive operation could have resulted in plenty of problems. I am proud to be part of the team that helped to avoid that (find the core team in an image on the right). After having accomplished one of my main goals as a steward since my first election in 2007 and with new duties at my jobs, I had to refocus my steward activities.

I still do some CheckUser, global anti-vandalism, and similiar stuff but nowadays I’m more interested in helping my dear fellows to work in a healthy, fruitful environment. Therefore, I am also in close connection with the WMF for global ban discussions, and development of a global user merge tool (which unfortunately will very likely not be developed soonish, see phabricator task). Further, I helped prepare the first-ever real-life steward meeting at the Wikimedia Foundation’s and published a German summary. As far as I can see, such joint activities led to a closer relationship among stewards and better coordination. If confirmed I intend to continue these activities in addition to handling selective general steward requests.

Comments about DerHexer

Keep, ok. --Vogone (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trusted. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trustworthy and very experienced. --Altkatholik62 (talk) 14:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Syum90 (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep always approachable, very active --Gereon K. (talk) 14:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, ok -- Cadfaell (talk) 14:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Andreas Werle (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Toni Müller (talk) 15:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Helfmann (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. RadiX ∞ 15:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 15:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FCT Berlin • ^=>?! • 16:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Behalten! :)[reply]
Keep --Agruwie (talk) 16:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Brainswiffer (talk) 16:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Emergency doc (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widr (talk) 16:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep thx, wiktionary.de Susann Schweden (talk) 16:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Kartoffeln--Vituzzu (talk) 16:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep auch von mir ein großes Dankeschön für deine Hilfe im deutschsprachigen Wiktionary *unverzichtbar* — Caligari ^Ɔɐ^ƀïиϠ_Ⴕ 17:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sally Meyer (talk) 17:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Koenraad (talk) 17:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--BRP^ever 17:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Agricolax (talk) 18:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Danke für deine kompetente Unterstützung im Wiktionary --Yoursmile (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Danke! --Alexander Gamauf (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Dankeschön! --Mario-WL (talk) 18:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pimpinellus (talk) – WikiMUC – 18:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Unrelinquishable! Best wishes![reply]
Keep. --Bubo 容 18:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Petronas (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --1971markus (talk) 19:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Asio otus (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active enough and though I had issues with how the confirmations went, actions after that were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 19:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wassertraeger 19:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Geolina163 (talk) 19:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Didi43 (talk) 20:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Thank You for everything![reply]
Keep Of course! Ajraddatz (talk) 20:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Murma174 (talk) 21:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Riley Huntley (talk) 21:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Miniapolis 21:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC) because I really do not know enough to comment.[reply]
Keep of course! --Impériale (talk) 22:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Emptywords (talk) 22:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kurtis (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why not? --White Master (e s) 23:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Betterknower (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Regiomontanus (talk) 00:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ste moc 01:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 02:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Az1568 (talk) 02:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No doubt! Thanks for your commitment to the cause! --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 03:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --PaulaMeh (talk) 04:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jbergner (talk) 05:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Dnepro.. (talk) 06:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —Ah3kal (talk) 06:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Der DerHexer muss weiter gehen. — T. 06:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Danny B. 07:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep eurodyne (talk) 08:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Laurent Jerry (talk) 08:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --J.Dygas (talk) 09:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pankoken (talk) 12:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trusted -- smial (talk) 13:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--WS ReNu (talk) 13:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Gerold Rosenberg (talk) 13:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep thorough — billinghurst sDrewth 13:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lutheraner (talk) 14:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep definitely, he is trustworthy, reliable and competent --Udo T. (talk) 14:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yes! Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 15:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for your longer time activity as a steward. rxy (talk)
Keep, excellent job with SUL finalisation — NickK (talk) 16:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Epìdosis 16:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Luke 081515 16:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with regards from VINCENZO1492 17:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Freddy2001 ^talk 17:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with regards from Schelmentraum 19:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Florianschmidtwelzow (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --XXnickiXx (talk) 18:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 19:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Uğurkent^talk 20:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Emes (talk) 20:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--DCB (talk) 21:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Selbstverständlich! One of the most involved and helpful stewards, both publicly and behind the scenes. -- Avi (talk) 21:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Opposing or pretending neutrality is not as funny if you're not the only one to vote that way. No counter-arguments detectable anywhere, as it seems. → «« Man77 »» ^[de] 22:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Plani (talk) 23:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Du hast mein Vertrauen, Gruß, --Shisha-Tom (talk) 08:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Keep up the good work! --Tilman2007 (talk) 09:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --WolfgangRieger (talk) 10:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Partynia (talk) 10:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Cvf-ps (talk) 13:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alraunenstern (talk) 16:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--- Darwin ^Ahoy! 01:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Peter Gröbner (talk) 06:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Itti (talk) 09:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, great and trusted user. Alex Pereira ^falaê 10:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Code (talk) 11:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AnnaS.aus I. (talk) 11:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ali1610 (talk) 17:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jan Kovář^BK (talk) 18:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --AleXXw (talk) 19:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Aude (talk) 20:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]