Stewards/elections 2011-2/votes/Teles

Teles (Lucas Teles)

Teles talk · contribs · SULinfo (accounts) / stalktoy · globalcontribs · crosswiki-ness · confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:

• Languages: pt-N, en-3, es-2
• Personal info: Hi, everybody. I am 25 years old and my home-wiki is pt.wikipedia, where I am sysop and bureaucrat. Wikipedia was introduced to me by my mother in 2007 and I have always been involved in vandalism combat. I am active as sysop of Portuguese Wikipedia since 2009 and passed through the first confirmation five months after being elected and through the second confirmation about two months ago. On that wiki, I was already checkuser for a one year term and that is why I am already identified to the Foundation. I am also sysop here on Meta and on Strategy wiki.

  I don't remember when exactly (January 2010 perhaps), but has been a while I decided to "explore" different wikis to see how they work. I started with English Wikipedia, then Spanish Wikipedia and Simple English Wikipedia. At the end of the last year, I became more active on cross-wiki vandalism combat. Due to this, I was elected global rollbacker and global sysop, which gave access to tools that are still very useful for me (you can check some info about my sysop tool usage here: 1, 2). I am often on IRC, where I watch the antivandalism channels and report to stewards those vandalisms I have no permission to handle.

  I consider it is very important to be always available to other users to explain the actions performed and be willing to accept others' opinions, respecting the sovereignty of each community. Anyone can contact me on IRC, my talk page and by e-mail. I always answer respectful messages. I think I have enough knowledge about the stewards policy and important other policies as oversight and checkuser policies, but also some other info one can just learn from experience. I would be glad to help more on vandalism combat and by attending the many other requests. Feel free to ask any question you might have or ask for any other info. Thank you for reading and good luck to all candidates.

azərbaycanca:

• Dillər: pt-N, en-3, es-2
• Şəxsi informasiya: Hamıya salamlar! Mənin 25 yaşım var və fəliyyət göstərdiyim əsas vikipediya idarəçi və bürokrat olduğum portuqalca vikipediyadır. Vikipediyaçılıq mənə anamdan 2007-ci ildə keçmişdir və mən dailmi olaraq vandalizmlə mübarizə aparıram. Portuqalca vikipediyada 2009-cu ildən aktiv idarəçiyəm və ilk dəfə beş aydan sonra birinci etimad seçkisində, ikinci dəfə isə ikinci etimad seçkisində iki ay bundan əvvəl istifadəçilərin etimadını qazanmışam. Həmin vikidə həmçinin bir il ərzində təftişçi olmuşam və bu səbəbdən də Vikimediya fonduna şəxsiyyətimi dəqiqləşdirmişəm. Bundan başqa Метаda və СStrateji vikidə idarəçiyəm.

  Dəqiq yadımda olmayan tarixdə (deyəsən 2010-cu ilin yanvarında) mən müxtəlif vikilərin necə işlədiyini "yoxlamaq" fikrinə düşdüm. Əvvəlcə ingiliscə vikipediyada, sonra isə ispanca vikipediya və sadələşdirilmiş ingilscə vikipediyada. Keçən ilin sonundan etbarən mən kross-viki vandalizmlə mübarizədə daha aktivəm. buna əsəsən də qlobal rolbaker və qlobal idarəçi seçilmişəm, bu da mənə bir sıra mühüm alətlərə yaxın olmaq imkanı verdi. (siz mənim idarəçi fəaliyyətimi burada 1, 2 yoxlaya bilərsiniz). Mən həmçinin IRC-də antivandalizm kanallarında stüradlara özümün əlii çatdırmağa səlahiyyətim olmayan hallar barədə məlumat verirəm.

  Mən digər istifadəçilərə hərəkətlərimi izah etmək üçün yaxın olmağı, hər bir cəmiyyətin suverenliyinə hörmət göstərməyi vacib hesab edirəm. Mənimlə hamı İRC, müzakirə səhifəm və yaxud e-poçt vasitəsilə əlaqə saxlaya bilər. Mən xoşməramlı yazılan bütün sözlərə cavab verirəm. fikrimcə, mənim stüard qaydaları və digər mühüm, məsələn oversayt və təftişçi qaydaları haqqında kifayət qədər məlumatım vardır, amma digər mühüm məsələləri yalnız təcrübə yolu ilə öyrənmək olar. Mən vandalizmlə daha artıq mübarizəyə və bir çox digər ərizələrə yardım etməyə şad olardım. Sizə maraqlı olan və məlumat əldə edə biləcəyiniz sualları soruşmaqdan çəkinməyin. Oxuduğunuza görə təşəkkürlər və bütün namizədlərə uğurlar.

български:

• Езици: pt-N, en-3, es-2
• Лична информация: Здравейте! На 25 години съм и "домашното" ми уики е Уикипедия на португалски, където съм администратор и бюрократ. В Уикипедия ме въведе моята майка през 2007 година и винаги съм бил съпричастен с борбата с вандалите. Активен администратор на португалската Уикипедия съм от 2009 година и издържах първо одобрение пет месеца след гласуването и второ одобрение преди около два месеца. Тук в Мета вече съм избиран веднъж за проверяващ (checkuser) за срок от 1 година и по тази причина вече съм се идентифицирал пред Фондация Уикимедия. Администратор съм тук в Мета и в Стратегическото уики.

  Не помня кога точно започах (може би януари 2010 година), но от известно време "изследвам" различни уикита, за да разбера как работят. Започнах с Уикипедия на английски, после Уикипедия на испански и Уикипедия на прост английски. В края на миналата година започнах да взимам по-дейно участие в борбата с cross-wiki вандализма. Благодарение на това бях избран за глобален отменящ (rollbacker) и глобален администратор, което ми даде достъп до инструменти, които намирам за много полезни (можете да научите повече за това как си ползвам правата оттук: 1, 2). Често съм на линия в IRC, където наблюдавам каналите за противодействие на вандалите и докладвам на стюардите за онези вандализми, за които нямам права да поема лично.

  Смятам, че е важно винаги да бъдеш на разположение на други потребители, за да обясниш действията си, и охотно да приемаш чуждото мнение, като уважаваш суверенитета на всяка отделна уики общност. Всеки може да се свърже с мен по IRC, на беседата ми и по електронна поща. Винаги отговарям на любезните съобщения. Мисля, че познавам достатъчно добре политиката за стюардите и другите важни политики като тези за наблюдаващите (oversight) и за проверяващите (checkuser), а също и имам информация, която може да се добие само от опита. Бих се радвал да мога да помогна по-добре за борбата с вандализма и да обслужвам многото други заявки към стюардите. Ще се радвам да отговоря на всеки ваш въпрос или да предоставя всякаква друга информация. Благодаря ви за вниманието и желая успех на всички кандидати.

বাংলা:

• ভাষা: pt-N, en-3, es-2
• ব্যক্তিগত তথ্যাদি: হাই! আমার বয়স ২৫ বছর, এবং আমার মূল উইকি হচ্ছে পর্তুগিজ উইকিপিডিয়া, যেখানে আমি একজন প্রশাসক ও ব্যুরোক্র্যাট। ২০০৭ সালে, আমার মা আমাকে উইকিপিডিয়ার সাথে পরিচয় করিয়ে দেন, এবং আমি সবসময়ই ভ্যান্ডালিজম প্রতিরোধের কাজের সাথে জড়িত। ২০০৯ সাল থেকেই আমি পর্তুগিজ উইকিপিডিয়ার একজন প্রশাসক, এবং নির্বাচিত হওয়ার পাঁচ মাস পরে আমি আমার প্রথম কনফার্মেশন উৎরে যাই। এবং প্রায় দুই মাস আগে আমি আমার দ্বিতীয় কনফার্মেশন নিশ্চিত করি। পর্তুগিজ উইকিপিডিয়াতেই আমি এক বছর সময়ের জন্য চেকইউজার হিসেবে দায়িত্ব পালন করেছি, যার ফলে আমি ইতিমধ্যেই ফাউন্ডেশনের কাছে আমার পরিচয়ের প্রমাণ প্রদান করেছি। সেই সাথে আমি মেটা এবং স্ট্র্যাটেজি উইকিতেও একজন প্রশাসক।

  ঠিক কখন আমি অন্যান্য উইকিগুলো কিভাবে কাজ করে তা জানা শুরু করি, তা আমার সঠিকভাবে মনে পড়ছে না (সম্ভবত ২০১০ সালের জানুয়ারিতে)। তবে আমার শুরুটা হয় ইংরেজি উইকিপিডিয়ার মাধ্যমে, তারপর আমি স্পেনীয় ও সিম্পল ইংলিশ উইকিডিয়াতে কাজ করা শুরু করেছিলাম। গত বছরের শেষ দিক থেকে আমি ক্রস-উইকি ভ্যান্ডালিজম প্রতিরোধের কাজে আরও বেশি সক্রিয় হই। যার ফলে, আমি পরবর্তীতে গ্লোবাল রোলব্যাকার ও গ্লোবাল প্রশাসক হিসেবে নির্বাচিত হই। এই টুলগুলো আমার খুবই কাজে দিয়েছে এবং দিচ্ছে (আপনি ১ ও ২ নং লিংক ব্যবহার করে আমার এই টুলগুলো ব্যবহারের ইতিহাস জানতে পারেন)। আমি সচরাচর আইআরসিতে সক্রিয়।, যেখানে আমি অ্যান্টিভ্যান্ডালিজম চ্যানেলগুলোতে সক্রিয় ও যখন তা প্রতিরোধের জন্য আমার পর্যাপ্ত কারিগরী সুবিধা থাকে না, তখন আমি তা প্রতিরোধের জন্য স্টুয়ার্ডদের অনুরোধ করি।

  আমি মনে করি এটি খুবই গুরুত্বপূর্ণ যে, প্রত্যেকেরই নিজের অ্যাকশনগুলো ব্যাখ্যা করা উচিত, এবং অন্যদের মতামত গ্রহণ করার মতো মানসিকতা থাকা উচিত। আমি প্রত্যেকটি সম্প্রদায়ের স্বাধীনতায় বিশ্বাসী। যে-কেউ, যে-কোনো সময় আইআরসিতে আমার সাথে যোগাযোগ করতে পারেন, আমার আলাপ পাতা বা আমাকে ই-মেইলের মাধ্যমেও তাঁদের বক্তব্য প্রকাশ করতে পারেন। আমি মনে করি স্টুয়ার্ড নীতিসহ অন্যান্য গুরুত্বপূর্ণ নীতি, যেমন: ওভারসাইট ও চেকইউজার নীতির ব্যাপারে আমার যথেষ্ট পরিমাণ জ্ঞান রয়েছে। তাছাড়াও সবাই সব সময়ই অভিজ্ঞতা থেকে শিখতে পারে। স্টুয়ার্ড হিসেবে আমি ভ্যান্ডালিজম প্রতিরোধের কাজে আরও সক্রিয়ভাবে সাহায্য করতে পারবো বলে আমি মনে করি, তাছাড়াও অন্যান্য অনেক স্টুয়ার্ড অনুরোধগুলোর কাজেও আমি সাহায্য করতে পারবো। আপনার যদি কোনো প্রশ্ন থেকে থাকে তবে আপনি নির্দ্বিধায় আমাকে জিজ্ঞাসা করতে পারেন। আমার বক্তব্য পড়ার জন্য আপনাকে ধন্যবাদ, এবং সকল প্রার্থীর জন্য শুভকামনা।

Deutsch:

• Sprachen: pt-N, en-3, es-2
• Informationen zur Person: Hallo allerseits. Ich bin 25 Jahre alt und mein Heimatwiki ist die portugiesische wikipedia, dort bin ich Administrator und Bürokrat. Ich wurde von meiner Mutter 2007 in die wikipedia eingeführt und habe mich seitdem in der Vandalismusbekämpfung engagiert. Seit 2009 bin ich als Administrator der portugiesischen Wikipedia aktiv, wurde fünf Monate später zum ersten Mal und vor zwei Monaten zum zweiten Mal bestätigt. Auf diesem wiki habe ich bereits eine einjährige Amtszeit als Checkuser absolviert und bin daher bereits gegenüber der Wikimedia Foundation identifiziert. Außerdem bin ich Administrator hier auf Meta und auf Strategy wiki.

  Genau kann ich mich nicht mehr erinnern (es war vielleicht Januar 2010), aber es ist schon eine ganze Weile her, dass ich beschlossen hatte, verschiedene wikis zu "erforschen", um zu sehen, wie diese arbeiten. Begonnen habe ich mit der englischen Wikipedia, dann die spanische Wikipedia und die einfache englische Wikipedia. Ende letzten Jahres bin ich dann in der wiki-übergreifenden Vandalismusbekämpfung aktiv geworden. In Folge dessen wurde ich zum globalen Zurücksetzer und globalen Administrator, wodurch mir Zugang zu Funktionen gewährt wurde, die für mich sehr nützlich sind (eine gewisse Übersicht über meine administrativen Aktivitäten gibt es hier und hier). Ich bin häufig im IRC anzutreffen, wo ich die Antivandalismuskanäle beobachte und den Stewards den Vandalismus melde, den zu behandeln ich selber nicht die ausreichenden Berechtigungen habe.

  Für mich ist es sehr wichtig, immerzu für alle Benutzer ansprechbar zu sein, um ihnen die durchgeführten Aktionen zu erklären, und bereit zu sein, die Meinungen anderer zu akzeptieren, sowie die Eigenständigkeit jeder wiki Gemeinschaft zu respektieren. Jeder kann mich über IRC, meine Benutzer Diskussionsseiten und E-mail erreichen, respektvolle Nachrichten werden ich stets beantworten.

  Ich denke, ich habe ausreichend Kenntnis über die Steward Richtlinien und andere wichtige Regelwerke wie z.B. bzgl. Oversight und Checkuser, alles weitere werde ich durch die Erfahrung lernen. Ich freue mich, noch mehr der Vandalismusbekämpfung und bei den anderen Anfragen helfen zu können. Bitte stelle mir alle Fragen, die Dir wichtig sind, egal welche Information Dir noch fehlt. Vielen Dank für Deine Aufmerksamkeit und allen Kandidaten viel Erfolg!

suomi:

• Kielet: pt-N, en-3, es-2
• Henkilökohtaiset tiedot: Hei kaikki. Olen 25-vuotias ja kotiwikini on pt.wikipedia, jossa olen ylläpitäjä ja byrokraatti. Tutustuin Wikipediaan äitini välityksellä vuonna 2007 ja olen aina ollut mukana vandalismintorjunnassa. Olen aktiivinen ylläpitäjä portugalinkielisessä Wikipediassa vuodesta 2009 asti. Läpäisin ensimmäisen uusintaäänestykseni viisi kuukautta valintani jälkeen ja toisen uusintaäänestykseni noin kaksi kuukautta sitten. Toimin aiemmin pt.wikipediassa vuoden ajan osoitepaljastajana, minkä vuoksi olen jo todistanut henkilöllisyyteni Wikimedia-säätiölle. Olen myös ylläpitäjä täällä Metassa sekä strategiawikissä.

  En muista tarkkaa ajankohtaa (tammikuu 2010 kenties?), mutta jo jonkin aikaa sitten päätin ruveta "tutkimaan" toisia wikiprojekteja nähdäkseni miten ne toimivat. Aloitin englanninkielisestä Wikipediasta, sitten espanjankielisestä Wikipediasta ja selkokielisestä englanninkielisestä Wikipediasta. Viime vuoden lopusta lähtien olen ollut aktiivisesti mukana wikienvälisen vandalismin torjunnassa. Tämän vuoksi minut valittiin globaaliksi palauttajaksi ja globaaliksi ylläpitäjäksi. Näihin oikeuksiin liittyvät työkalut ovat yhä todella hyödyllisiä minulle (voit nähdä tietoa ylläpitäjätyökalujen käytöstäni täältä: [1], [2]). Olen usein IRC:ssä, jossa valvon vandalismintorjuntakanavia ja raportoin ylivalvojille vandalismista, jonka käsittelyyn minulla ei ole oikeuksia.

  Mielestäni on erittäin tärkeää olla aina tavoitettavissa perustelemaan toimensa sekä olla valmis hyväksymään toisten mielipiteet jokaisen yhteisön itsenäisyyttä kunnioittaen. Kuka tahansa voi ottaa minuun yhteyttä IRC:ssä, keskustelusivullani ja sähköpostilla. Vastaan aina kohteliaisiin viesteihin. Uskon, että minulla on tarpeeksi tietoa ylivalvojien käytännöistä ja muista tärkeistä käytännöistä kuten häivyttämisestä ja osoitepaljastimesta, mutta osa tiedoista pitää oppia kokemuksen kautta. Auttaisin mielelläni enemmän vandalismin torjunnassa ja erinäisten toimintapyyntöjen käsittelemisessä. Kysy vapaasti jos kaipaat lisätietoa jostakin asiasta. Kiitos että luit tämän ja onnea kaikille ehdokkaille.

français:

• Langues : pt-N, en-3, es-2
• Renseignements personnels : Bonjour à tous. J'ai 25 ans et mon wiki principal est pt.wikipedia, où je suis administrateur et bureaucrate. Wikipédia m'a été présenté par ma mère en 2007 et j'ai toujours été impliqué dans le combat contre le vandalisme. Je suis un administrateur actif de la Wikipédia portugaise depuis 2009 et ai passé ma première confirmation cinq mois après avoir été élu et ma seconde confirmation il y a environ deux mois. Sur ce wiki, j'ai également été vérificateur d'utilisateurs pour une période d'un an et c'est pour cela que je suis déjà identifié à la Fondation. Je suis aussi administrateur ici sur Meta et sur Strategy wiki.

  Je ne me rappelle plus exactement quand (sans doute en janvier 2010), mais j'ai pris du temps avant de me décider à "explorer" différents wikis pour voir comment ils fonctionnent. J'ai commencé avec la Wikipedia anglophone, puis la Wikipédia hispanophone et la Wikipédia en anglais simple. A la fin de cette dernière année, je suis devenu plus actif dans le combat contre le vandalisme cross-wiki. En conséquence, j'ai été élu global rollbacker et global sysop, ce qui donne accès à des outils qui me sont toujours très utiles (vous trouverez plus d'informations sur l'utilisation de mes outils d'admin ici : 1, 2). Je suis souvent sur IRC, où je surveille les canaux d'antivandalisme et rapporte aux stewards les vandalismes que je n'ai pas la permission de traiter.

  Je considère qu'il est vraiment important d'être toujours disponible pour expliquer aux autres utilisateurs les opérations effectuées et de vouloir accepter les opinions des autres tout en respectant la souveraineté de chaque communauté. Tout le monde peut me contacter via IRC, ma page de discussion ou par e-mail. Je réponds toujours aux messages respectueux. Je pense suffisamment connaitre la politique des stewards et les autres importantes politiques comme celles concernant l'oversight et les vérifications d'utilisateurs, mais aussi d'autres choses qui ne viennent qu'avec l'expérience. Je me ferais un plaisir d'aider plus dans le combat contre le vandalisme en traitant les nombreuses autres requêtes. N'hésitez pas à me poser une question ou à me demander plus de précisions. Merci de m'avoir lu, et bonne chance à tous les autres candidats.

עברית:

• שפות: pt-N, en-3, es-2
• מידע אישי: דיבור כאן

Bahasa Indonesia:

• Bahasa yang dikuasai: pt-N, en-3, es-2
• Informasi pribadi: tuliskan pernyataan Anda di sini

italiano:

• Lingue: pt-N, en-3, es-2
• Informazioni personali: Salve a tutti, ho 25 anni e la mia home-wiki è pt.wikipedia, dove sono amministratore e burocrate. ho conosciuto Wikipedia grazie a mia madre nel 2007 e sono sempre stato coinvolto nella lotta al vandalismo. Sono un attivo amministratore della wikipedia in portoghese dal 2009 ed ho superato una prima riconferma cinque mesi dopo l'elezione e una seconda due mesi fa. Su pt.wiki sono stato checkuser per un anno ed è perciò che sono già identificato presso WMF. Sono amministratore anche su Meta e su Strategy wiki.

  Non ricordo precisamente quando (forse a gennaio 2010), ma ho deciso di "esplorare" altre wiki per vedere come funzionassero. Ho iniziato con la wikipedia in inglese, poi quella in spagnolo e inglese semplificato. Alla fine dell'ultimo anno sono diventato più attivo nella lotta al vandalismo cross-wiki e, perciò, sono stato eletto global rollbacker e global sysop, che mi consente di avere a disposizione degli strumenti che mi sono molto utili (puoi controllare la mia attività qui e qui). Speso sono sui canali IRC, dove seguo i canali antivandalismo e riferisco agli steward dei vandalismi che non posso gestire.

  Considero molto importante essere sempre disponibili per spiegare agli altri utenti le azioni fatte e voler accettare le altrui opinioni, rispettando la sovranità delle varie comunità. Chiunque mi può contattare via IRC, sulla mia pagina di discussione o via e-mail. Rispondo sempre ai messaggi educati. Penso di conoscere abbastanza la stewards policy ed altre importante policy come quella sull'oversight e sul checkuser ma anche altre informazioni che si possono acquisire solo grazie all'esperienza. Mi farebbe piacere aiutare di più nella lotta al vandalismo rispondendo alle richieste. Sentiti libero di pormi ulteriori domande o altre informazioni. Grazie per avermi letto e in bocca al lupo a tutti i candidati.

日本語:

• 言語: pt-N, en-3, es-2
• 候補者の情報: こんにちは、みなさん。私は25歳で、ポルトガル語版ウィキペディアをホームウィキとしており、管理者とビューロクラットを務めています。2007年に母からウィキペディアを紹介され、荒らしとの戦いにずっと関わってきました。ポルトガル語版ウィキペディアでは2009年から管理者となっており、選出されてから5ヶ月で最初の確認を、2回目の確認を2ヶ月前に経験しました。そのウィキではチェックユーザとなってから既に1年が経ち、そのため私は既に財団への身分証明を済ませています。このメタとStrategyウィキでも管理者です。

  私は他のウィキではどのような作業が行われているのかを"探検"することを決めた時を覚えていません(たぶん2010年1月くらい、少なくとも一定期間が経っています)。英語版ウィキペディアから始め、その後スペイン語版、シンプル英語版を訪ねました。最後の年の終わり、ワタｈ師はウィキ間荒らしとの戦いにより活発になりました。これにより、私はグローバルロールバッカー、グローバル管理者となり、私にとって今でもとても便利なツールへのアクセスが与えられました。私はよくIRCにおり、荒らし対策チャンネルを監視し、処理する権限を持たないそれらの荒らしをスチュワードへ報告しています。

  私は常に行動のを他の利用者へ説明できることがとても重要と考え、それぞれのコミュニティの自治を尊重しつつ、他の方の意見を聞く用意があります。誰でもIRCで、私の会話ページで、そしてEメールで私に連絡がとれます。丁寧なメッセージには常に答えます。私はスチュワードポリシー、オーバーサイトとして重要なほかの方針、そしてチェックユーザポリシーに十分な知識、他の幾つかは経験からのみ学べると思いますが、を持っていると思います。私は、荒らしとの戦いに、また沢山の依頼を世話することで、より多く貢献できることを嬉しく思っています。あなたがもっているであろう疑問について、もしくは他の情報についてご自由に質問なさってください。お読みいただけたことに感謝するとともに、すべての候補者の健闘を祈ります。

Nederlands:

• Taalvaardigheid: pt-N, en-3, es-2
• Persoonlijke informatie: Hallo allemaal. Ik ben vijfentwintig jaar oud en mijn thuiswiki is pt.wikipedia, waar ik moderator en bureaucraat ben. Ik werd geïntroduceerd tot Wikipedia door mijn moeder in 2007 en ik heb me altijd beziggehouden met vandalismebestrijding. Ik ben actief als moderator van de Portugeestalige Wikipedia sinds 2009 en doorliep de eerste herbevestiging vijf maanden na te zijn verkozen en de tweede herbevestiging ongeveer twee maanden geleden. Op die wiki was ik reeds checkuser voor één jaar en daarom ben ik al geïdentificeerd bij de Foundation. Ik ben ook moderator hier op Meta en op Strategy-wiki.

  Ik herinner me niet meer precies wanneer (misschien januari 2010), maar het is een tijd geleden dat ik besloot andere wiki's te "ontdekken" om te zien hoe die werkten. Ik begon met de Engelstalige Wikipedia, toen de Spaanstalige Wikipedia en simpele Engelstalige Wikipedia. Aan het eind van vorig jaar werd ik meer actief in crosswiki vandalismebestrijding. Naar aanleiding hiervan werd ik verkozen tot global rollbacker en global sysop, waardoor ik tools kan gebruiken die nog steeds erg bruikbaar zijn voor mij (u kunt hier enige info vinden over mijn gebruik van de sysop-tools: 1, 2). Ik ben vaak op IRC, waar ik de antivandalisme-kanalen in de gaten houd en aan de stewards het vandalisme rapporteer als ik zelf niet bevoegd ben het aan te pakken.

  Ik vind het heel belangrijk om altijd beschikbaar te zijn voor andere gebruikers om de door mij uitgevoerde acties uit te leggen en om bereid te zijn andermans meningen te accepteren, met respect voor de soevereiniteit van elke gemeenschap. Iedereen kan mij contacteren op IRC, mijn overlegpagina en via e-mail. Ik beantwoord respectvolle berichten altijd. Ik denk dat ik over genoeg kennis beschik van het stewardbeleid en ander belangrijk beleid, zoals het oversight- en checkuserbeleid, maar ook kennis die alleen kan worden opgedaan door ervaring. Ik zou graag meer willen helpen bij de vandalismebestrijding en het volgen van de vele andere verzoeken. Voel je vrij om elke vraag te stellen die je hebt of om meer info te vragen. Dank je voor het lezen en succes gewenst aan alle kandidaten.

português:

• Línguas: pt-N, en-3, es-2
• Informações pessoais: Olá a todos. Eu tenho 25 anos e minha home-wiki é a pt.wikipedia, onde eu sou administrador e burocrata. A Wikipédia foi apresentada para mim por minha mãe em 2007 e eu estive sempre envolvido no combate a vandalismo. Eu estou ativo como administrador da Wikipédia em português desde 2009 e passei pela primeira renomeação cinco meses após ter sido eleito e pela segunda renomeação cerca de dois meses atrás. Naquela wiki, eu já fui verificador por um mandato de um ano, motivo pelo qual já estou identificado na Fundação. Eu também sou administrador aqui no Meta e na Strategy wiki.
  

  Eu não lembro quando exatamente (janeiro de 2010 talvez), mas já faz um tempo que eu decidi "explorar" diferentes wikis para ver como elas funcionam. Eu comecei com a Wikipédia em inglês, depois a Wikipédia em espanhol e Wikipédia em inglês simples. No final do ano passado, me tornei mais ativo no combate a vandalismo em diferentes wikis. Devido a isso, fui eleito reversor global e administrador global, que me deram acesso a ferramentas que são ainda hoje bastante úteis para mim (você pode verificar algumas informações sobre o meu uso das ferramentas de administrador aqui: 1, 2). Eu estou frequentemente no IRC, onde eu vigio os canais antivandalismo e informo aos stewards sobre aqueles vandalismos com os quais não posso lidar por não ter permissão.
  

  Eu considero ser muito importante estar sempre disponível a outros usuários para explicar ações realizadas e estar disposto a aceitar opiniões de outros, respeitando a soberania de cada comunidade. Qualquer um pode me contactar no IRC, na minha página de usuário e por e-mail. Eu sempre respondo a mensagens respeitosas. Eu acho que possuo conhecimento suficiente sobre a política de stewards e outras políticas importantes, como a política de supressão e verificação, mas também algumas outras informações que só podem ser aprendidas através da experiência. Eu ficaria feliz em poder ajudar mais no combate ao vandalismo e poder responder aos outros tantos pedidos. Sinta-se à vontade para fazer qualquer pergunta que possa ter ou pedir qualquer outra informação. Obrigado por ter lido e boa sorte a todos os candidatos.

Tiếng Việt:

• Ngôn ngữ: pt-N, en-3, es-2
• Thông tin cá nhân: Chào mọi người. Tôi năm nay 25 tuổi và trang nhà của tôi là pt.wikipedia, nơi tôi làm bảo quản viên và hành chính viên. Tôi được mẹ của mình giới thiệu về Wikipedia từ năm 2007 và tôi luôn luôn tham gia chiến đấu chống phá hoại. Tôi hoạt động như một sysop của Wikipedia tiếng Bồ Đào Nha từ năm 2009 và được duyệt qua lần xác nhận đầu tiên năm tháng sau khi tôi được bầu và được duyệt qua lần xác nhận thứ hai cách đây khoảng hai tháng. Trên wiki đó, tôi được phong quyền kiểm định viên với nhiệm kỳ một năm và đó là lý do tại sao tôi đã được Quỹ xác nhận [danh tính]. Tôi cũng là sysop trên meta này và trên Strategy wiki.

  Tôi không nhớ chính xác khi nào (có lẽ là tháng 1 năm 2010), nhưng đã có lúc tôi quyết định "khám phá" các wiki khác nhau để xem cách họ làm việc. Tôi bắt đầu với Wikipedia tiếng Anh, sau đó là Wikipedia tiếng Tây Ban Nha và Wikipedia tiếng Anh đơn giản. Cuối năm ngoái, tôi trở thành thành viên của đội chống phá hoại liên-wiki. Do vậy mà tôi được bầu là người lùi sửa toàn cầu và sysop toàn cầu, từ đó có thể truy cập vào các công cụ vẫn còn rất hữu ích đối với tôi (các bạn có thể kiểm tra một vài thông tin về các công cụ sysop mà tôi sử dụng tại: 1, 2). Tôi cũng thường có mặt trên IRC, ở đó tôi quan sát các kênh chống phá hoại và thông báo cho các tiếp viên để họ làm những việc mà tôi không có quyền xử lý.

  Tôi rất coi trọng vấn đề phải luôn có mặt để giải thích các tác vụ thực hiện bởi người dùng khác và sẵn sàng chấp nhận ý kiến của người khác, tôn trọng chủ quyền của mỗi cộng đồng. Bất cứ ai cũng có thể liên lạc với tôi trên IRC, trang thảo luận của tôi và qua e-mail. Tôi luôn trả lời các tin nhắn hòa nhã. Tôi nghĩ rằng mình có đủ hiểu biết về chính sách tiếp viên và các chính sách quan trọng khác của giám sát viên và kiểm định viên, nhưng cũng có một số thông tin khác chỉ có thể học hỏi từ việc trải nghiệm. Tôi sẽ vui lòng được trợ giúp thêm trong việc chiến đấu chống phá hoại và tham gia các yêu cầu khác. Hãy hỏi tôi bất kỳ câu hỏi nào mà bạn có hoặc yêu cầu tôi đối với bất kỳ thông tin khác. Cảm ơn bạn đã đọc và chúc tất cả các ứng cử viên may mắn.

中文:

• 可说语言: pt-N, en-3, es-2
• 个人资料: 大家好，我今年25歲，我的主維基是pt.wikipedia。在那裡我是管理員及行政員。2007年我的母親把維基百科介紹給我，之後我一直致力於反破壞。我從2009年起是葡萄牙語維基百科的管理員，並在選上5個月後通過了第一次權限確認，又在2個月前通過第二次權限確認。我在那兒擔任過1年用戶核查員，因此我已經向基金會表面身份。我同時也在元維基和Strategy wiki上是管理員。

  我不記得什麼時候（大約是2010年1月）起，我開始「探索」各個不同的維基是如何運作的。我先加入了英語維基百科，隨後加入西班牙語維基百科和簡單英語維基百科。去年年末，我在跨維基反破壞工作中變得更活躍。因此，我獲得全域回退員和全域管理員的權限。這些權限對我大有幫助（你可以在這裏查看我對管理員權限的使用：1、2）。我經常會在IRC上監視反破壞頻道，並在沒有權限處理相關情況的時候向監管員匯報。

  我認為，向其他用戶解釋自己的行為、聽取其他人的意見以及尊重各個社群的自主權是很重要的。任何人都可以通過IRC、我的用戶討論頁或電子郵件聯系我。我一定會回復有禮貌的留言。我認為我對監管員方針及其他重要的方針如oversight和用戶核查方針很熟悉了，其他的方面可以邊做邊學。我希望可以更多地協助反破壞工作以及協助其他的請求。歡迎向我提問。謝謝您花時間閱讀，並祝其他候選人好運。

中文（简体）:

• 可说语言: pt-N, en-3, es-2
• 个人资料: 大家好，我今年25岁，我的主维基是pt.wikipedia。在那里我是管理员及行政员。2007年我的母亲把维基百科介绍给我，之后我一直致力于反破坏。我从2009年起是葡萄牙语维基百科的管理员，并在选上5个月后通过了第一次权限确认，又在2个月前通过第二次权限确认。我在那儿担任过1年用户核查员，因此我已经向基金会表面身份。我同时也在元维基和Strategy wiki上是管理员。

  我不记得什么时候（大约是2010年1月）起，我开始“探索”各个不同的维基是如何运作的。我先加入了英语维基百科，随后加入西班牙语维基百科和简单英语维基百科。去年年末，我在跨维基反破坏工作中变得更活跃。因此，我获得全域回退员和全域管理员的权限。这些权限对我大有帮助（你可以在这里查看我对管理员权限的使用：1、2）。我经常会在IRC上监视反破坏频道，并在没有权限处理相关情况的时候向监管员汇报。

  我认为，向其他用户解释自己的行为、听取其他人的意见以及尊重各个社群的自主权是很重要的。任何人都可以通过IRC、我的用户讨论页或电子邮件联系我。我一定会回复有礼貌的留言。我认为我对监管员方针及其他重要的方针如oversight和用户核查方针很熟悉了，其他的方面可以边做边学。我希望可以更多地协助反破坏工作以及协助其他的请求。欢迎向我提问。谢谢您花时间阅读，并祝其他候选人好运。

中文（繁體）:

• 可說語言: pt-N, en-3, es-2
• 個人資料: 大家好，我今年25歲，我的主維基是pt.wikipedia。在那裡我是管理員及行政員。2007年我的母親把維基百科介紹給我，之後我一直致力於反破壞。我從2009年起是葡萄牙語維基百科的管理員，並在選上5個月後通過了第一次權限確認，又在2個月前通過第二次權限確認。我在那兒擔任過1年用戶核查員，因此我已經向基金會表面身份。我同時也在元維基和Strategy wiki上是管理員。

  我不記得什麼時候（大約是2010年1月）起，我開始「探索」各個不同的維基是如何運作的。我先加入了英語維基百科，隨後加入西班牙語維基百科和簡單英語維基百科。去年年末，我在跨維基反破壞工作中變得更活躍。因此，我獲得全域回退員和全域管理員的權限。這些權限對我大有幫助（你可以在這裏查看我對管理員權限的使用：1、2）。我經常會在IRC上監視反破壞頻道，並在沒有權限處理相關情況的時候向監管員匯報。

  我認為，向其他用戶解釋自己的行為、聽取其他人的意見以及尊重各個社群的自主權是很重要的。任何人都可以通過IRC、我的用戶討論頁或電子郵件聯系我。我一定會回復有禮貌的留言。我認為我對監管員方針及其他重要的方針如oversight和用戶核查方針很熟悉了，其他的方面可以邊做邊學。我希望可以更多地協助反破壞工作以及協助其他的請求。歡迎向我提問。謝謝您花時間閱讀，並祝其他候選人好運。

Questions: See Stewards/elections 2011-2/Questions#Teles

Yes

1. --Vituzzu 00:03, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
2. Yes. Teles has been an active global sysop for some time now, and I completely trust him and his ability to perform steward tasks well. I'd also like to add how completely rediculous it is that there are people opposing per possible checkuser abuse by another user. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:04, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
3. Support – Aye. —Gfoley Four— 00:09, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
4. Ruy Pugliesi^◥ 00:11, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
5. --Lucas Nunes 00:14, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
6. Mathonius 00:55, 15 September 2011 (UTC) Yes, please.
7. --Jcaraballo 01:14, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
8. --Shizhao 01:36, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
9. ←fetchcomms 01:39, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
10.  Support --minhhuy*= 02:54, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
11.  Support -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:25, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
12. Courcelles 03:55, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
13.  Support--В и к и в и н др е ц и 04:14, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
14. Good crosswiki experience and language skills. Zachlipton 04:50, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
15.  Support --►Safir yüzüklü Cekli^mesaj 04:56, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
16. Jafeluv 06:57, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
17. --Harald Krichel 06:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
18. --Reder 07:01, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
19. --Mercy 07:04, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
20. --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 07:16, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
21. --Hosiryuhosi 07:46, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
22. --Kiran Gopi 08:14, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
23. --Jsjsjs1111 09:15, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
24. -- Macdonald-ross 09:43, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
25. --^Email Vaibhav ^Talk 10:11, 15 September 2011 (UTC) Trusted guy.
26.  Support Active and trusted user. --Millosh 11:17, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
27. Support Trusted user and he's very helpful!--Frigotoni ...i'm here; 11:39, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
28. No issues.Worm^TT 11:52, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
29. --თოგო ^(D) 12:01, 15 September 2011 (UTC) ridiculous that there are opposes because someone else has an open Arbcom case...
30.  Support --N KOzi^Talk 12:17, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
31. --Ebrahimi-amir 12:18, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
32. (EC) Just because somebody Teles worked with somebody now undergoing an investigation about CU abuse doesn't mean Teles will abuse CU. Reaper Eternal 12:18, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
33.  Support Qrzysztof 14:08, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
34. Active, trusted, Savh^ñ 15:28, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
35.  Support a×p_de^Hello! 15:30, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
36.  Support — D.DEU. 15:44, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
37. Definitely, excellent candidate. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 16:03, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
38. –SJ talk | translate   16:49, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
39.  Support As i opened the ArbCom request while i was member of the pt.wiki ArbCom, i can say there were no issues on Teles conduct in that case. Saying on his general cross-wiki contributions and his general opinions, i can only give my support, as he is an active, helpful and trusted user and seems very capable for acting as a steward. CasteloBranco^msg 17:46, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

    Note: Castelobranco was excluded of this ArbCom's case because he was CheckUser too, thefore, he was no idea of what the ArbCom are discussing. JSSX 18:10, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

    Yes, that's my opinion, as you have yours and the other people voting for or against have theirs. Neither of our opinions represents the ArbCom, obviously, and doesn't need too. Specially because Teles was never involved in any request of that kind. So there are no issues regarding any checks performed by Teles on that request or in others, as you want to convince us. CasteloBranco^msg 19:48, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

40. Yep. ~ Ningauble 18:07, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
41.  Support I don't care, who his friends are. I judge Teles alone. Therefore full support. --Hedwig in Washington 18:22, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
42. Excellent candidate. Quadell 18:32, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
43. Narayan₈₉ 18:42, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
44. MoiraMoira 19:00, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
45. Pablo000 19:04, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
46.  Support, experient and trustworthy user whom I admire for his impartiality and rationality, and also to combat what I perceive as a spurious personalization of discussions, and an embarassing attempt to bring to Meta the ridiculously silly feuds which have plagued ptwiki in years. Even users who are not active in that wiki anymore are coming here to vote against their personal 'enemies'. RafaAzevedo 19:48, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
47.  Support. Te apoyo, en mi opinión tienes todo lo que hace falta (experiencia) para que uno de los pocos candidatos decentralizados pueda ser elegido. Dan6hell66 21:32, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
48.  Support,ya--An Macanese 23:48, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
49. Slon02 00:59, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
50. --Wagino 20100516 01:30, 16 September 2011 (UTC)--
51. mickit 08:09, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
52. Matanya 10:26, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
53. Strong experience, good answers to questions. Warofdreams 12:42, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
54. --Juhni 13:08, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
55. --FalconL ^?! 16:28, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
56. Good answers to questions. Ruslik 19:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
57. Imdadb 20:21, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
58.  Support per Ajraddatz. — Kudu ^~I/O~ 21:00, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
59. --Stryn 11:07, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
60. If there was real evidence that the user's viewpoints could influence performing steward's tasks for the worse, I'd think better before voting. For now I don't see convincing arguments among the opposers. --Microcell 12:58, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
61.  Support  Hazard-SJ  ±  17:44, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
62. For similar reasons to supporting Ruy Pugliesi. Association with someone accused and not proven of CU abuse does not make this candidate unsuitable. 1ForTheMoney 22:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
63. --Xania 23:52, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
64.  Support I have interacted with Teles as a steward running checks on PtWiki and I believe he would help the wikimedia projects as a steward. -- Avi 02:16, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
65.  Support --Flamelai 08:46, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
66. --WizardOfOz ^talk 09:45, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
67.  Support----Dispe 12:42, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
68. fr33kman 19:29, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
69.  Support Addihockey10 05:19, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
70. --Irada 06:20, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
71.  Support Rjclaudio ^Talk 01:34, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
72.  Support Pc^msg 02:08, 20 September 2011 (UTC) It is an excellent user.
73.  Support. The majority of opposes seem like sour grapes to me. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:57, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
74.  Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 09:54, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
75. yes FiliP ██ 10:06, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
76. --Jusjih 10:30, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
77. Gobonobo 18:48, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
78. –BruTe ^talk 19:05, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
79.  Support Comte0 16:14, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
80.  Support ) Marek.69 ^talk 00:14, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
81. Bullmoosebell 00:47, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
82. Yes Openskye 03:28, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
83. Seems a good candidate based on responses. Effeietsanders 07:42, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
84. Marcos Elias de Oliveira Júnior 12:45, 22 September 2011 (UTC) - yes.
85. Teles will make an excelent steward. The attempt by some users to discredit his work is sadly risible. --ThiagoRuiz ^talk 01:36, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
86. Personality is good and I do not know pt so I cannot comment on those matters. Ottava Rima (talk) 01:47, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
87.  Support It is intimidating for me to vote on a steward because I hardly know how to check what a user has done on multiple Wiki projects. I am supporting this user based on my liking the responses to the questions asked, particularly about "combat", and because I am not convinced that the reasons stated in the "opposition" section are weighty enough to oppose (the checkuser issue), and because this user seems to have a respectable colleague in fellow Portuguese editor Ruy Pugliesi. Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:26, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
88. Pietro Roveri 22:05, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
89. Mayur ^{(talk•Email)} 06:31, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
90. --Lluis tgn 09:44, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
91. Silent ^(Contact) 11:07, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
92. — Manticore 11:25, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
93. Armbrust 11:30, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
94. Has the project's best interests at heart, has made a few mistakes, but none as exaggerated by the pile-on opposers below who assert that his continued presence is detrimental to the project. --—Ancient Apparition 12:53, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
95. Active, friendly and helpful SWMT member for some time now, why not? - Hoo man (talk) 13:22, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
96. Candidate has excellent cross-wiki experience. —mc10 (t/c) 01:17, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
97.  Support Henryk Borawski 07:25, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
98. Blanket  Support for all candidates as opposition to the blanket opposition by User:Riffic, in support of open balloting. --Yair rand 07:58, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
99.  Support--Aidabishkek 08:29, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
100. --Steindy 20:09, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
101.  Support GastelEtzwane 21:23, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
102.  Support José Luiz ^talk 09:43, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
103.  Support Tttom 03:51, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
104. Support - Modernist 12:46, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
105. MADe 14:20, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
106. Support -- Tegel _(Talk) 14:50, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
107. ...Aurora... 14:52, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
108.  Support --Zyephyrus 13:13, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
109. Rsocol 16:26, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
110. Erwin 18:25, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
111. Bennylin 14:59, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
112.  Support Vitor Mazuco ^Msg 17:15, 4 October 2011 (UTC) One of the best pt-wiki sysops!!!!
113. Vago 11:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
114.  Support Mardetanha ^talk 10:44, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
115.  Support--Sokac121 12:15, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
116. Based on cross-wiki activity and consistency. -- Mentifisto 12:50, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
117. --Emaus 18:52, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
118. I've seen you doing global stuff very well and that's what really matters. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 23:57, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

No

1. I would like to say yes, but  no. My opposition here is just because this user endorse your friend Ruy Pugliesi in anytime and everywhere. So I cant say yes for a user that endorse a user with an open process in lusophone wikipedia about misuse of checkuser tool. --- @lestaty ^discuţie 08:17, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
2.  Oppose The user Ruy Pugliesi has an open process (ArbCom) in lusophone wikipedia about misuse of checkuser tool. Teles is a friend of Ruy, was CheckUser in the same period of Ruy, and always defends Ruy in any situation. JSSX 11:33, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
3. Sorry, but no. Like Teles, i'm still waiting a Ombudsman Comission appreciation about the Arbcom issue, because Teles was listed as involved part in the Arbcom request opened by CasteloBranco (former Crat, CU and Arbcom member). Teles has my support to GR, GS, admin, crat - but not steward (until this request still without a conclusion). Leandro Martinez msg 12:14, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
4.  Oppose Aleposta 13:12, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
5.  Não, as Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt says, your friendship isn't more important that your flags. He is a good user, but I have doubts about your capacity in solve this problems, in this cases. Alex Pereira ^falaê 14:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
6. Nixón 16:39, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
7.  Oppose Pugliesi's friends are in need to not mix up their relationship with the need to follow Wikimedia policies (Teles mixed up it not mentionning to the community the Pugliesi's usage of CU tools), Ombusdman commission is in the need to be very less slowly than waiting for months to say something (so, this canvass comment is double dealer; What I'm supposed to expect from some that says this from a ArbCom request openned by stablished users!?) and pt.wikipedia ArbCom is in the need to be less slowly and to be more effective. Simply as is. Lugusto • ※ 18:13, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
8.  Oppose I'm sorry Teles, but I have to say NO because of your friendship and loyalty to Ruy Pugliesi and his bad actions in wiki/PT. Nice poa 19:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

   Comment: On the accusation of misuse of checkuser tool, ArbCom asked the Ombudsman Comission an analysis of the case. A member of Ombudsman Comission has just said that there was no abuse. Anyone can place a request to ArbCom, no matter if right or wrong on complaint. We have to make our decisions based on conclusions taken from a request; in this case, was concluded by Ombudsman Comission that there was no abuse and I can't see a reason to discredit this conclusion. I could say a lot about this case, but I can't write to much here. If anyone has any question, please, use my talk page. I would like to thank Thogo for avoiding this unfair trial from some users. Nobody wanted more a fast response from local ArbCom than me, but I cannot be blamed by its slowness... and not even for being more close to Ruy Pugliesi. My only request is that people do not become satisfied with an accusation but also try to check if it is true. Thanks.” T_ele^s (T _{@ L C S}) 21:48, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

   The ArbCom proccess has oppened by stablished users, not by trolls, as you are trying to induce the readers. You are a partner, for not having denounced the abuses. Period. Lugusto • ※ 16:43, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

   Note: OC is not judging that, ArbCom is; and that is not acusations, are evidences in a ArbCom process who had been accepted (if was not true the case would be denied on spot). Decisions until now: Arbcom resolutions: Ricco21 - unblock, Sabrina - unblock and Indech - unblock. In Indech case, for example, the stewards confirmed that was no sock puppet. JSSX 11:17, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

   On Indech/Sabrina case, the checkuser logs were too old, so stewards couldn't have access to the logs that leaded to previous decision and no access to behavioral information. I wasn't even a checkuser anymore when Ricco21 was checked and I don't even had access to checkuser info of him, so I can't say anything about it. Some accusations are related with cases that happened when I wasn't even a checkuser yet. The other checkusers were performed by Ruy Pugliesi and Ombudsman commission confirmed that there is not anything wrong on any of them. Most users that are opposing here are from pt.wiki and are voting for personal reasons. Some were already blocked or involved on previous conflicts... and that is a sad revenge. I did never say any user above is a troll or anything, but I can say that all of pt.wiki users above were already in conflict with me or Ruy Pugliesi in the past. I have nothing to hide and I am willing to explain any doubt a non-pt.wiki user might have.” T_ele^s (T _{@ L C S}) 16:49, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

   Comment And those who voted for the couple? MachoCarioca 09:05, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

9. --Taichi - (あ！) 02:41, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
10. -- Ul1-82-2 15:28, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
11. --Holder 17:59, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
12. The concerns are too worrying I'm afraid. Another time when things are sorted maybe. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 18:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

    What concerns are there? He doesn't hate a user who at one point was suspected of checkuser abuse, but has been proven innocent by the ombudsman committee? It is ridiculous that ptwiki drama is having any effect on the votes of non-ptwiki users. It should also be noted that Teles isn't his "friend" any more than myself or any of the other people who supported him on Ruy's request for global rollback. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:33, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

13.  Oppose Of course NOT. This editor only acts through ad hominem behaviour on Wiki-pt and supports and endorse his friend Ruy Pugliesi (vote #4) - another strongly controversial editor submitted to this election - in anytime, any matter and everywhere. Both act in partnership, and are only two "flag collectors ' throughtout Wikimedia. Suspect of people who act like owners of the truth and use their tools to enforce this truth unilaterally. Suspect a lot. These ones with the right weapon in hand, and this is one, can destroy an idea or an entire project. He is a loyal accomplice of one of the most controversial editors on Wiki-pt, Ruy Pugliesi, and capable of shaping all the rules of Lusophone project to always be defending his companion. Wiki rules for Teles, he only follows the one that interests him to follow. As a steward, it would be a catastrophe. By far, by a country mile, by a landslide, the worst sysop and most ad hominem and partial behaviour on Wiki-pt using his tools as sysop. Both, he and Pugliesy, double-act. Both of them applied for steward together or nobody noticed? This is a tragedy, alot of drama is coming. MachoCarioca 08:26, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
14.  Oppose --ST ○ 16:00, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
15. Blanket 'NO' votes for all candidates to protest open balloting. riffic 07:19, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
16. Per Lugusto. --Alex F. 12:05, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
17.  Oppose Sorry, but no. --Allforrous 04:22, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
18.  Oppose. Unsolved serious issues on wiki-pt. Sorry! Belanidia 15:55, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
19.  Oppose AroundTheGlobe 17:30, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

     Oppose Robertogilnei 15:09, 29 September 2011 (UTC) Ineligible per this, does not have enough edits.

20.  Oppose Beyond My Ken 02:26, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
21. Unfortunately, not. I'm worried by the fact that I see no any signs of understanding of the other side in the CU accident. Even if there are no misuse, he should care more. And, probably, to support Ruy more accurately. Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 01:55, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

    I'm wondering if you could, please, clarify what is the "other side" of the CU "accident" (and what was the "acciddent" by the way if there was no misuse); how I would "care more" and how I should "probably" support Ruy more accurately. I really don't know exactly what you are saying. Thanks.” T_ele^s (T _{@ L C S}) 08:56, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

    Well, let me add something from what I could understand from your sentence. Looks like you are considering that is true that I am used to blindly support another user (Ruy). This is not true. In fact, I've already supported him many times when we shared the same opinion and it was a reasonable idea as I did with many others. However, I have no problem to say that I disagree with him and it already happened a few times. For example, the last time we both participated on a discussion I did not agree with him (diff). So, "support Ruy accurately" is a great advice, but I think I already do it. I pay attention to 'what' is being discussed/proposed and not 'who' is involved. This is just another accusation with no diff and my diff above proves it is not true. I understand it is very hard to non-local users to check if this is true; what I don't understand is why it is being considered true without any proof. As I said above, a member of Ombudsman Commission confirmed that they couldn't see any abuse on the CU tools and I don't know what I could do different (I cannot report any CU abuse if there is no abuse). The case was discussed a lot locally and it is not solved yet only because we have a very slow ArbCom and I don't know exactly why they need an year (the case was opened on last december) to solve this case. Even thought I was not accused of misuse, every question done to me was answered, as long as privacy policy allowed; I answered to each request from ArbCom members and was totally agreed with the opening of this case and participation of Ombudsman Commission. It is sad to see that any unproved accusation was considered here and discover how a few local users, moved by personal reason (previous blocks or conflicts), are allowed to interfere on many other uninvolved users. Anyway, I'm still waiting for some better explanation of your advice, then maybe I can understand them and follow. Thanks. Respectfully, ” T_ele^s (T _{@ L C S}) 22:35, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

    No. no portuguese stewards til portuguese Wikipedia as improved. Why you want to be steward? Work on the portuguese matter, you have there a lot to do! Jorge alo 04:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. Does not have enough edits.

    I want to be a steward as I believe I can help a lot other wikis that also needs to be improved, which I already do as a global sysop and global rollbacker, but I feel I can do some more. I am Portuguese speaker and my home-wiki is pt.wikipedia, that is why I have been helping to improve pt.wikipedia the way I can; I am an active sysop since 2009 with almost no wikibreak, participating on important discussions and making the five pillars (specially fourth) to be respected by everyone. Some local issues occur and are solved before most of the users even notice they occured and users like you can keep helping the way you can. Every wiki needs some improvement and will always need. Some wikis need more help than others however. For example, all other Portuguese projects need more help than pt.wikipedia and that is why I watch them every day I am here. You can think about all other wikis that have no active sysop, but have a few users spending their times for believing that one day that wiki will be great. I believe they are right and that is why I want to be a steward.” T_ele^s (T _{@ L C S}) 08:56, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

22. Nemo 19:57, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
23.  Oppose --ProtoplasmaKid 21:41, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
24. --Kero 21:48, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
25.  Oppose--Rcandre 12:27, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Of course NOT. This editor only acts through ad hominem behaviour on Wiki-pt and supports and endorse his friend Ruy Pugliesi (vote #4) - another strongly controversial editor submitted to this election - in anytime, any matter and everywhere.

    You probably have a diff to "only acts through ad hominem behaviour on Wiki-pt", don't you? Thanks.” T_ele^s (T _{@ L C S}) 14:21, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

26. -- Waithamai 14:47, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
27.  Oppose Raystorm 15:02, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
28. --MF-W 19:05, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
29. Quintinense 20:16, 4 October 2011 (UTC) Por favor, quem puder e quiser, traduza minha justificativa O usuário, como administrador da Pt-Wiki, utiliza mal a ferramenta de reversor. Não sabe diferenciar edições válidas de inválidas, reverte-as todas de uma vez, praticando verdadeiros vandalismos, removendo informação válida como se combate ao vandalismo fosse. Um exemplo, GRES Roseira Imperial arquivo que se adequava aos critérios de notoriedade e tinha fontes, foi proposto para eliminação, e colocado em votação por um IP, que o Teles alegava ser meu por contorno de bloqueio (mas nunca foi comprovado via CU). Pois durante a votação, outros usuários concordaram com a tese de que o artigo era válido, mas o Teles simplesmente cancelou a votação e eliminou o artigo, indo contra a vontade de muitos que cometeram o "crime" de concordar com um usuário que contornava bloqueio. Este tipo de interpretação tacanha da política de bloqueio da wiki-pt já gerou vários outros vandalismos, como por exemplo GRCESM Tijuquinha do Borel, GRCES Estrela do Terceiro Milênio, Anexo:Lista de torcidas organizadas do Clube Atlético Mineiro, entre inúmeros outros. Informações claramente válidas são revertidas por este administrador, por isso creio que ele claramente não possui condições de ter a ferramenta global rollback e isso sem falar no status de verificador, pois atuou junto do Ruy que é investigado até hoje, e muito embora eu nem acredite que tenha havido abuso da política de privacidade por parte de ambos, este é um caso onde não basta ser inocente, tem que parecer ser inocente também, sem margem para dúvidas. A OC e o Arbcom da Pt.Wiki ainda não puderam esclarecer o que aconteceu, portanto até que isso aconteça, não há clima para que estes usuários possam ter este tipo de ferramenta novamente.

    Those reverts were done according to pt.wiki blocking policy, that says that we have to revert edits done under block evasion (as it was self-confessed above with "user that was evading a block", despite not needed due to w:WP:DUCK). I will keep following local policies; I've blocked lots of your socks (ex: 1, 2) and, if local policies don't change, I will keep doing it. You are free to appeal your block if want edit. Nothing else to say about it as I'm sure that is not necessary to explain the reason of following local policies and blocking accounts that evades a previous block. All Wikimedia projects do that.” T_ele^s (T _{@ L C S}) 14:21, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

30.  Oppose GRS73 02:31, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
31.  Oppose I'm sorry Teles. Óptimo editor mas.... --João Carvalho 12:05, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
32.  Oppose De acordo com os de cima Alan63 15:26, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
33.  Oppose To many problems around him to have my trust. Béria Lima ^msg 17:13, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
34.  Oppose I expect stewards to be calm, cool and level-headed, I am not satisfied with what I've seen so far, Teles along with a couple of others, has shown an aggressive debating posture in a few situations. Also, after reading the concerns above, I can not support, sorry Teles. Theo10011 17:18, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

    I can't recall a single situation when I was aggressive. Do you have the diffs for "aggressive debating posture in a few situations"? Thanks.” T_ele^s (T _{@ L C S}) 22:43, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

    How about this one? or the questions above. An ideal steward does not question every other vote, regardless, if you want I can link to diffs from RfAs and Ruy's global request which I had in mind, while voting. It is nothing wrong, just a personal preference, ideal steward candidates don't engage every critique personally and demand evidence. Theo10011 23:26, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

    This one... what? My message above? I was justing asking for a diff. I don't know how can this be "aggressive". You said I am "aggressive". I think I have the right to know when I was aggressive, because it is something I really don't like to see in other user. I thought you would have a diff for this accusation. Some of accusations above are not true or are just personal attacks and require a diff; plenty of them were done by blocked users, sockpuppeters, meetpuppeters... I was very active as sysop and I expected to see some socks here. To me, being aggressive is making a false accusation like some pt.wiki users did and try to make others believe it is true. I didn't question "every vote" as you said and I can't understand why would I be aggressive when just respectfully answering the comments about me fi the 'content' of my message is not aggressive. About those diff from RfAs and Ruy's global request, yes, I would like to see them please.” T_ele^s (T _{@ L C S}) 23:55, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

35.  Oppose --NaBUru38 18:39, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
36. --Saibo (Δ) 23:40, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Neutral

1. --Davidbottan 13:40, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
2. Dbiel 05:20, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
3. --Sergey Semenov^talk 23:46, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
4. Erring on the side of caution. Prashanthns 15:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
5. - Davecrosby uk 20:23, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
6. &UNeutral ║▒ ★ Inhakito ★ ^{╚Talk to me╝} 21:42, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
7. --Oneiros 20:22, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
8. Even after re-reading questions, unsure. Lantrix 14:42, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
9. VonTasha 16:58, 5 October 2011 (UTC)