Stewards/Elections 2021/Votes/Lofty abyss

The 2021 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Lofty abyss

ContentsYes • No • Neutral

Lofty_abyss talk • contribs • accounts (stalktoy) • globalcontribs • confirm eligibility  — Translate: translation help, statement, template

• Languages: en-4, mt, it-2 (at a very basic level I can also understand most Romance languages)
• Personal info: (English)
  I was a steward in the past, but I made some mistakes, for which I apologize. I am, though, hoping to ask for another chance at continuing; for the last two years since not having the tools I have kept crosswiki monitoring, with a bit of assistance from global rollback, but it gets frustrating when LTAs or casual wiki-hopping vandals keep disrupting when no one who could stop them is around, and just rolling their edits back only works temporarily. I primarily dealt with spambots when I could lock them, and for the past two years I still reported them. I also handled the aforementioned long-term disruptors, but currently I block them locally where I could, before informing others (along with the usual sysop vandalism etc. blocks/deletions, whereas on small wikis it's just reversions/taggings).

  I've generally been a gnome throughout the fifteen years I've been registered, fixing markup and typos along with the administrative tasks mentioned above, and I also like keeping an eye on otrs' info-en queue, while responding to oversight/suppression requests too. I've always welcomed feedback on any of my actions, and while two years ago there seemed to be some miscommunication, I'd still like to ask anyone for feedback at any time of the year, as one can only improve and ameliorate through such assessments.

  If given another chance I will strive to avoid the mistakes committed in the past, and would hope that they weren't the kind that would preclude the possibility of another chance. I mostly dealt with the spambot problem (by also checkusering to find bot farms), and would be interested to continue doing so, along with SRP/SRG etc. I think I can be more effective with the tools than I am currently. Please go through my logs (1, 2, 5000 entries each) if desired, but I hope that, even if there are mistakes among them, I can become better in the future.

  Thanks. ~Lofty abyss 23:52, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
• Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2021/Questions#Lofty_abyss

English: You are not eligible to vote. More information

Yes

2. AGK (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Many of the concerns appear to be overblown. AGK ■ 14:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
3. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  I agree with AGK here. I was pretty annoyed with LA's wikilawyering at the confirmations a couple years back, but my main concern there was inactivity and unwillingness to engage. He's since been pretty active, and he was always good at the mindlessly locking spambots stuff. No concerns from me. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
4. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  He never should have been removed to begin with. He shot himself in the foot with the wikilawyering, but the underlying concerns were not enough to merit removal. This is unlikely to pass, but I continue to disapprove of how the removal was handled, so I’ll be here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
5. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021 •  Per Tony Praxidicae (talk) 18:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
6. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
7. Wiwik P (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021 •  Wiwik P (talk) 01:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
8. NickK (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Mostly moral support because I think steward rights should not have been removed the last time. But I do not appreciate the behaviour that followed — NickK (talk) 12:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
9. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Jusjih (talk) 23:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
10. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  Hiàn (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
11. Alexdoherty4 (Eligible, checked by 94rain)2021 •  Alexdoherty4 (talk) 03:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
12. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  Vituzzu (talk) 17:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
13. علاء (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  --Alaa :)..! 17:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
14. Nehaoua (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  Nehaoua (talk) 22:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
15. Csisc (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  Csisc (talk) 17:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
16. Bff (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Bff (talk) 19:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
17. Wim b (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Wim b 14:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
18. M.Tarnowski (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  M.Tarnowski (talk) 18:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
19. Юрко Градовський (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Юрко Градовський (talk) 13:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
20. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  Shizhao (talk) 01:49, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
21. Érico (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Érico (talk) 00:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
22. Rashid Jorvee (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Rashid Jorvee (talk) 12:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
23. Bestoernesto (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 03:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
24. User3749 (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  User3749 (talk) 08:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
25. Dash77 (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021 •  Dash77 (talk) 01:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

       VKG1985 (Not eligible, checked by ZabeMath) •  VKG1985 (talk) 12:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

26. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  OlEnglish ^(Talk) 13:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
27. Serial Number 54129 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  The oppose votes are basically rehashing the whole confirmation thing (during which IIRC I voted against theirs, vocally); but the allegations weren't so egregious that they never had another chnace. Not only is it there right to request, but I think the project should be wary of shooting itself in the foot just for the sake of ancient histrionics. ——SerialNumber54129 17:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
28. Charitwo (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Per Ajr and Tony Charitwo (talk) 22:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
29. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Novak Watchmen (talk) 23:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
30. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  --Marshallsumter (talk) 02:33, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

No

1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021 •  Notwithstanding the previous rights discussions, the begging to be a steward in the statement is, quite frankly, an embarrassment. Rschen7754 14:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
2. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021 •  Not convinced; still harping on how the removal of steward rights in 2019 only happened because he didn't know the MultiLock tool existed, which is definitely a too creative interpretation of what happened. MF-W 14:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
3. Naleksuh (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  For all the same reasons your request for global sysop failed 3 months ago in Steward_requests/Global_permissions/2020-10#Global_sysop_for_Lofty_abyss Naleksuh (talk) 14:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
4. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
5. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Unfit for the role, as also the off-the-point answers on the 'Questions' page once again impressively show. --Vogone (talk) 14:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
6. Tks4Fish (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  —Thanks for the fish! ^{talk•contribs} 14:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
7. Savh (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021 •  Not aware of why he was not confirmed (blames MultiLock), still doing the minimum to seem 'active'. Savh^ñ 14:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
8. ImprovedWikiImprovment (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  Per everything said at their 2019 Steward confirmation, 2020 enwiki CU request, 2020 Steward election, and Global Sysop request last October. The candidate is not particularly active even on their home wikis, and is certainly not sufficiently active cross-wiki. I would need years of sustained activity to even consider this user for a permission like steward again, and I too find it embarrassing that he is once again requesting steward without changing at all. He also neglects to mention in either his nomination statement or answers to questions the actual reason he was removed as steward (and no, it was nothing to do with a creation of a tool). Permissions are not meant to be collected, and that is what this appears like to me. --IWI (talk) 14:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
9. Miraclepine (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  ミラP@Miraclepine 14:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
10. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021 •  No, per his last global sysop candidature and SE2020 candidature. Per others as well. Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
11. Blablubbs (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  Insufficient recent activity, and their answer to my question did not inspire confidence. Blablubbs (talk) 14:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
12. 4nn1l2 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  4nn1l2 (talk) 14:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
13. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  Stryn (talk) 14:23, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
14. Majavah (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Majavah (talk!) 14:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
15. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  — xaosflux ^Talk 14:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
16. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Has demonstrated multiple times to be unfit for this position. KPFC 💬 15:06, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
17. Spicy (Eligible, checked by Praxidicae)2021 •  Spicy (talk) 15:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
18. -revi (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Fails User:-revi/SEV#4.2 — regards, Revi 15:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
19. Uncitoyen (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  I think he/she isn't ready for stewardship right now. I agree with all the other negative comments. --Uncitoyen^talk 15:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
20. Minorax (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Minorax (talk) 15:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

       Улюбленець поїздів (Not eligible, checked by ZabeMath) •  I don't think for this user. Улюбленець поїздів (talk) 15:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

21. ElHef (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Answers to questions are perfunctory at best and do not indicate they understand the community's concerns. I'm particularly unimpressed with the examples of complex OTRS tickets. From what I can see, activity has actually decreased year-over-year since the last round of steward elections, when activity was a concern as well. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 15:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
22. Taivo (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  You are administrator in Commons, but your last 50 edits still go back until 2015. You do not use even the tools you have, you do not need new tools. Taivo (talk) 16:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
23. Barkeep49 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Clearly desires to hold high permissions but doesn't seem to accept the responsibility that comes with this (see previous Steward discussions, and enwiki CUOS application/discussion). Barkeep49 (talk) 16:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
24. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Has been a Commons admin for a long time apparently, but yet I've never seen him/her in any admin related area's. Natuur12 (talk) 16:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
25. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Miniapolis 16:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
26. GeneralNotability (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Per above, especially Barkeep49 and Martin. GeneralNotability (talk) 16:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
27. Vermont (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  I'd probably have supported if your statement was accurate. They weren't mistakes, they were a decade of inactivity with no intention to be involved in the community followed by a series of emotional outbursts when editors opposed your confirm. It wasn't that you missed a tool coming out, it was a marked lack of community participation. In the confirm I contested back in 2019, you gave 5 different and mutually exclusive explanations for why you were not active: your computer was broken, you lost IRC client config files, you didn't know about MultiLock, you lost interest in Wikimedia, and that you hadn't been inactive. I'm happy you've finally settled on one, but it's not a good one. The pattern of collecting hats and not using them has also continued. Vermont (talk) 16:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
28. SQL (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  SQL^{Query me!} 16:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
29. Pppery (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  * Pppery * _{it has begun} 17:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
30. ProcrastinatingReader (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 17:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
31. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  I will say, since last year, Lofty had been improving in activity, albeit still in low side. I am inclined to vote neutral for them until I see the mention of multi-lock, the issue isn't not using multi-lock, the issue isn't a single spambot but to block the underlying range. They seems unable to recognize the root cause of the issues. Sadly and regrettably Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
32. L235 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  KevinL (aka L235 · t) 18:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
33. BrunoBoehmler (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  BrunoBoehmler (talk) 18:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

       Улюбленець поїздів (Not eligible, checked by ZabeMath) •  Because, this user is not ready to be a steward Улюбленець поїздів (talk) 18:53, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

34. Kusurija (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021 •  Kusurija (talk) 19:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
35. Samuele2002 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Samuele2002 (Talk!) 21:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
36. Nguyentrongphu (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Hat-collector. Nguyentrongphu (talk) 21:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
37. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  ToBeFree (talk) 22:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
38. David Wadie Fisher-Freberg (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  dwf² ✉ 01:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
39. JavaHurricane (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Continued hat-collecting concerns. JavaHurricane 01:56, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
40. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by -akko)2021 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 03:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
41. Elliot321 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Their nomination mentioned previous issues with the role but not what they are - giving me pause about whether they should have it restored. Elliot321 (talk) 04:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
42. Nurtenge (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Nurtenge (talk) 07:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
43. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Majavah)2021 •  cyrfaw (talk) 08:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
44. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Johannnes89 (talk) 11:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
45. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by -revi)2021 •  Steward_requests/Global_permissions/2020-10#Global_sysop_for_Lofty_abyss 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 18:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
46. Imetsia (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Imetsia (talk) 18:22, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
47. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  The number of requests for permissions is concerning. Focus on using the tools you already have. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 18:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
48. OhKayeSierra (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021 •  Unsatisfied with answers to questions so far OhKayeSierra (talk) 19:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
49. Patrik L. (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021 •  Patrik L. (talk) 22:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
50. Geonuch (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021 •  Geonuch (talk) 01:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
51. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021 •  concerns with activity levels and recently failed GS request FASTILY 02:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
52. Saroj Uprety (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Saroj Uprety (talk) 02:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
53. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021 •  Esteban16 (talk) 02:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
54. Mirer (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Mirer (talk) 05:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
55. MJL (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  I supported both the request for Global Sysop and 2020 Steward candidacy of Lofty abyss. However, they seem to keep requesting advanced rights regardless if they even have a need. That really needs to stop, and I would like to see at least one full year where Lofty abyss isn't running for something. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 06:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
56. MarioJump83 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Serious hat collecting problems. MarioJump83! 08:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
57. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2021 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 10:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
58. Gripweed (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Gripweed (talk) 10:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
59. Giraffer (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  No. Giraffer (talk) 14:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
60. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Per statements above. Daniuu (talk) 16:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
61. John M Wolfson (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  With great reluctance, but your answers to questions do not inspire confidence. John M Wolfson (talk) 17:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
62. SK2242 (Eligible, checked by Martin Urbanec)2021 •  Inactive. SK2242 (talk) 18:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
63. Impartial just (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Well. Lack of cross-wiki experience. I think you can edit Enwikinews or other English small wikis more. ℑ𝔪𝔭𝔞𝔯𝔱𝔦𝔞𝔩 𝔧𝔲𝔰𝔱🎙️ 01:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
64. Whiteguru (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Inactive Whiteguru (talk) 10:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
65. Kudpung (Eligible, checked by Perryprog)2021 •  per Barkeep49 Kudpung (talk) 13:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
66. PoetVeches (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  PoetVeches (talk) 13:39, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
67. ArdiPras95 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  ArdiPras95 (talk) 21:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
68. KPX8 (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021 •  KPX8 (talk) 00:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
69. Jon Kolbert (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
70. 20041027 tatsu (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  20041027 tatsu (talk) 15:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
71. Dylsss (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Dylsss (talk) 16:53, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
72. Juan90264 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  Juan90264 (talk) 17:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
73. Zezen (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  As per Vermont and MJL's arguments above. Zezen (talk) 21:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
74. CanadianToast (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  CanadianToast (talk) 21:57, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
75. Cairo2k18 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  As per Vermont. Cairo2k18 • (talk) • (contribs) 06:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
76. Gobonobo (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  gobonobo ^{+ c} 07:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
77. Elizium23 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Elizium23 (talk) 01:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
78. Jmbranum (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  The candidate's lack of candor regarding past issues is a problem for me. Making mistakes is part of learning, but the second part of that learning requires reflection and action. Jmbranum (talk) 18:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
79. Santasa99 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  per Vermont ^{s a n t a | t a l k | p i t} 09:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
80. AVSmalnad77 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Per Vermont AVSmalnad77 ^talk 08:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
81. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021 •  Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
82. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2021 •  Rzuwig^► 11:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
83. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 • --Roland Kutzki (talk) 15:02, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
84. SMcCandlish (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Once bitten, twice shy.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ<  20:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
85. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021 •  *Youngjin (talk) 04:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
86. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Octahedron80 (talk) 09:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
87. Mercy (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Mercy (talk) 11:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
88. Steindy (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  --Steindy (talk) 20:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
89. NK1406 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  NK1406 (talk) 01:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
90. JLavigne508 (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021 •  JLavigne508 (talk) 13:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
91. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Per Rschen7754 - Obvious hat-collection. Also not happy with the answers to the "mistake" either. Not to sound harsh but shouldn't Lofty just be disqualified from hereon in? (it'd be like me running RFA at EN every bloody year .... would become boring and tiresome not only for myself but for fellow editors too). –Davey2010^Talk 17:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

    We've had one that tried to become a steward for 6 consecutive elections, so... Leaderboard (talk) 14:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

    Really ? wow!, Well don't worry - Lofty will overtake that record.... sad part is I'm not even joking. –Davey2010^Talk 21:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

92. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021 •  Ameisenigel (talk) 09:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
93. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by ImprovedWikiImprovment)2021 •  I'm not confident —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 14:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
94. Coffins (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021 •  Coffins (talk) 21:36, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
95. WikiAviator (Eligible, checked by Superpes15)2021 •  WikiAviator (talk) 02:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
96. Guerillero (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 04:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
97. Mrschimpf (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Mrschimpf (talk) 04:42, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
98. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:11, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
99. Bradv (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  – bradv🍁 20:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
100. Robert McClenon (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Robert McClenon (talk) 05:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
101. ZI Jony (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 06:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
102. Kallichore (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  --Kallichore (talk) 21:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
103. Nadzik (Eligible, checked by Fitindia)2021 •  Nadzik (talk) 08:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Neutral

2. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2021 •  Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 14:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
3. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Blablubbs)2021 •  I can't decide. CptViraj (talk) 16:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
4. Kizule (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  I can't decide too. Kizule (talk) 16:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
5. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  I can only quote my vote from your GS request 3 months ago: "Sysop on a number of wikis and a steward for nearly a decade. They have experience and can be trusted to not misuse the tools. The concern is - according to the logs - they seem to have a history of being rarely active with the tools outside of enwiki. And i don't see much improvement (e. g. they have sysop rights on Commons and they haven't made even a 100 edits there in 8 years). So I have my doubts about this and I'm not really excited to promote, but I am also not opposing.". Nothing really changed in this 3 months. To the point that even my comment on your Commons activity (less than 100 edits in 8 years) will soon become factually incorrect 'cause it'll be "less than 100 edits in 9 years"... Meiræ 07:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
6. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Less than 200 edits in 2020, and GS/R is how you should got more experience. GZWDer (talk) 13:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
7. Joseywales1961 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Joseywales1961 (talk) 13:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
8. Michel Bakni (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Michel Bakni (talk) 17:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
9. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 23:42, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
10. Blue Sonic (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021 •  Blue Sonic (talk) 02:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
11. Firestar464 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Firestar464 (talk) 11:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
12. Florian COLLIN (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2021 •  Florian COLLIN (talk) 22:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
13. 94rain (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Would like to see more elaboration on "mistakes" and "miscommunication". Answers to questions are not convincing. 94rain ^Talk 13:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
14. Veracious (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Veracious (talk) 14:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
15. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •   Klaas `Z4␟` V:  21:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
16. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Cbyd (talk) 10:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
17. Ahmetlii (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Ahmetlii (talk) 15:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

       Toad62 (Not eligible, checked by Uncitoyen) •  Toad62 (talk) 16:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

18. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 17:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
19. Sun8908 (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  Sun8908 (talk) 11:11, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
20. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 14:37, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
21. Carsrac (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Carsrac (talk) 08:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
22. Mykola7 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  Mykola7 (talk) 21:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
23. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  ~Cybularny ^Speak? 20:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
24. Zabia (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  Zabia (talk) 09:05, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
25. Gampe (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Gampe (talk) 10:42, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
26. Teles (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2021 •  Ainda tem minha confiança e acho que usaria as ferramentas adequadamente. Entretanto, acredito que precisa escolher um ou mais cargos e se desligar deles. Ainda parece não ser totalmente transparente quando questionado sobre problemas anteriores e responde como se a ferramenta MultiLock fosse a causa deles. —Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 14:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
27. JamesLucas (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  JamesLucas (talk) 13:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
28. Jules* (Eligible, checked by Saroj Uprety)2021 •  — Jules ^Talk 11:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
29. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker)2021 •  Darkhan 17:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
30. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by ZabeMath)2021 •  DannyS712 (talk) 22:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
31. Robert Važan (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  — Robert Važan (talk) 05:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
32. Masti (Eligible, checked by Miraclepine)2021 •  masti <talk> 18:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
33. Base (Eligible, checked by Uncitoyen)2021 •  As someone who has his share of mistakes too I cannot hold the drama the candidate caused two years ago against them forever, but I am not ready to support them yet. I am happy that they stick around and are building their trust back though. Base (talk) 12:11, 26 February 2021 (UTC)