Open main menu
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.


AmquiEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, & activity, steward actions counter | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: fr-N, en-4, es-1, it-1 (mic/cr-0.5)
  • Personal info: I have issues in real life that I don't want to expose here. I'm confident I will come back one day, but I understand if people would vote against my confirmation. Thanks for everybody, Amqui (talk) 23:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC) Note: Prior to the statement's addition, users saw and commented on a placeholder statement.

Comments about AmquiEdit

  •   Keep the greatest user on Wikimedia. Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove has been completely inactive since October and did not even create his own statement. I also still hold Peter's view that not creating a confirmation statement should leave to removal, almost regardless of other things, as the user has had a full month to do so. Snowolf How can I help? 18:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep I'm OK with Amqui keeping the rights despite being unavailable right now; there could be some good real-life justification in this case. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Alan (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep (weak) if he wants to. My interactions with this user have been very positive, and I am very pleased with their work on- and off- wiki, but it is true he is not very active. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove per Snowolf, but I am open to changing my !vote if there is good justification for his absence. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • I miss you! --Rschen7754 18:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove exact same as what Mh7kJ said. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove A very kind and reasonable user but nearly totally inactive as a steward, also already in the time when he still was active otherwise. --MF-W 18:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Inactive. Érico Wouters msg 18:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove November, December, January?--Ald™ (talk) 19:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep ok FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove, you should be more active. --Stryn (talk) 19:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Technically Amqui did run into the inactivity policy of stewards, although that policy does not seem to be in force.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    There are differing interpretations of the inactivity clause of the steward policy and I would say that given we hold yearly reconfirmations it's much easier to just handle it this way. Some day we should take a serious look at removing it. Snowolf How can I help? 06:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Not active, even no statement created rubin16 (talk) 19:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Too inactive, with only 39 log entries in 2013 and none in 2014. Plus you didn't write a statement. Techman224Talk 19:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Inactive. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 21:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove, Inactive. --Wiki13 talk 22:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral I agree both sides--DangSunM (talk) 23:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep   --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral as no issues with any of their work, though not making a confirmation statement seems tantamount to a resignation  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove reasonable user but not very active. --Glaisher [talk] 04:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove No statement created --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove no statement = removal Laaknor (talk) 13:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral no statement, per Billinghurst. --Abd (talk) 17:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove inactive + no statement --Goldenburg111 18:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove, per above. --Zerabat (talk) 02:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove – stewards should be active. TCN7JM 03:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove1. Per Jasper Deng; 2. We have full En-3~En-N, and they're at least bilingual.--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Great user but inactive steward. --Base (talk) 12:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral Guycn2 (talk) 17:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove due to inactivity. AGK [•] 18:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Kmw2700 (talk) 19:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Rome2 (talk) 21:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove What Base said. And for sure I would have preferred voting something else here... :/ -- Quentinv57 (talk) 21:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove -- We need active stewards which Amqui isn't. --Pratyya (Hello!) 05:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove per user req -FASTILY 12:43, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral not very active, but no issues with their work either; neutral due to the reason for his inactivity Trijnsteltalk 18:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove} per Snowolf. Armbrust (talk) 05:07, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove. Thanks for your work, Amqui, but I feel you haven't been active enough since your election to remain a steward for another year. I hope you'll someday get the chance to become more active again. Mathonius (talk) 11:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, give him a chance. --Midnight Gambler (talk) 14:14, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, per AGF. Please become more active, Amqui. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:05, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. He does a good job, even if is not very active for the moment. Cantons-de-l'Est (talk) 18:47, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Would be open to re-election with a half-year or more of sustained activity, but, like others have sad, good eprson, not active enough for the role. Courcelles 14:39, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, cannot remember any mistakes. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:49, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep I'm very confident about Amqui. A very serious and devoted contributor. He did a great job. Everyone can have personal issues that have consequences on its Wikimedia activity. --Deansfa (talk) 18:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove inactive --Holder (talk) 06:21, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove - per Snowolf. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove per Marcus Cyron --Gamma127 (talk) 15:00, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Remy34 (talk) 18:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove inactive. Legoktm (talk) 07:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove, sadly inactive. Jafeluv (talk) 12:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep "real life" --KhabarNegar 12:06, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


AvrahamEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, & activity, steward actions counter | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en, he-2
  • Personal info: Once again, I am pleased to see that the current body of stewards has, in the main, been able to support the corpus of Wikimedia projects relatively efficiently. I would like to continue supporting the projects as a steward, especially with global renames hopefully arriving this year, as I have years of experience with renames on my home wiki. I will also be serving as a member of the m:Ombudsman commission during 2014. Thank you for your past trust, and I hope to be able to continue to deserve it for this coming year.

Comments about AvrahamEdit

  •   Remove I prefer ombudsmen not to serve as stewards during their OC term. Vogone talk 18:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Active as a steward, no need to remove the rights for their term on OC I'd think. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. Alan (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Aftab1995 (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Active. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. Érico Wouters msg 18:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Rschen7754 18:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Stewards do more than just checkusers and oversights. The other activities stewards do are not private. Techman224Talk 19:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove per Vogone, OC activity should be independent from the activities it audits. Montgomery (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, no problems. --Stryn (talk) 19:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Shou;d not be an ombusman while steward. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 21:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Wiki13 talk 22:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep   --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep MBisanz talk 03:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep An excellent team member. This, that and the other (talk) 06:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep In my capacity as an individual, and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep no problems for me. Laaknor (talk) 13:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Pundit (talk) 16:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep I have seen us lose one of the best stewards over the alleged COI. --Abd (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Risker (talk) 01:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral --Zerabat (talk) 02:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep – Haven't ever personally interacted with the user, but seems like a good steward. TCN7JM 03:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Guycn2 (talk) 17:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, though I hope Avi will restrain his activity until his OC term ends. AGK [•] 18:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral I don't think that the roles of steward and ombudsman are incompatible. However, it may be wise to drop the steward bit during your term to entirely focus on the ombudsman work. But it remains your choice ;) -- Quentinv57 (talk) 22:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep No problem --Pratyya (Hello!) 05:48, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral only active around the confirmations, has too many buttons and isn't able to use them all (nothing against combi steward-OC) Trijnsteltalk 18:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • At second thought I was a bit harsh, so changed from remove -> neutral; my opinion still stands though. Trijnsteltalk 23:02, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:10, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove, per Vogone. Bernard (talk) 14:53, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep per TCN7JM. --Midnight Gambler (talk) 14:55, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, no problems IMO, experienced enough, active enough. PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, although I am hostile to being both a steward and an OC member. Elfix 18:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Vivaelcelta (talk) 20:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Defender (talk) 20:57, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   KeepTeles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:59, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:14, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Dan.- (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep I love you all~~ Bennylin 13:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep although I'm not happy with stewards being ombudsman at the same time but if you stay kinda active, I'm fine. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:51, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • of course --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove -- per Vogone. Collecting positions is a big problem. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Gamma127 (talk) 15:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   KeepDoRD talk 15:12, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -FASTILY 09:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. OC doesn't require members to relinquish steward tools anymore, and there's still plenty of steward stuff Avi can do without conflict with the OC role. Jafeluv (talk) 12:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 16:58, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep - Hoo man (talk) 12:53, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


BarrasEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, & activity, steward actions counter | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: de, en-4, fr-1
  • Personal info: This is my third steward confirmation, as I've been elected in 2011. I've been quite active during this year of services. I've used the steward tools for various purposes, such as helping with crosswiki deletions and blocks. I also dealt with vandalism and spam and locked and blocked many users and IPs. I also did some right changes, mainly to my own account to prevent more abuse and to remove abusive things, but also changed many other people's rights. I usually help everywhere, where help is needed, on IRC and also on-wiki. If you've any question, just ask me.

Comments about BarrasEdit

  •   Keep Vogone talk 18:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep very active, no concerns whatsoever. Snowolf How can I help? 18:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Per above, no concerns. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Alan (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Seen him on wikitech, and many more.Ald™ (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. Excellent steward, no concerns. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep I agree with all comments above mine. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Active and no concerns with their work at all. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Active and sensible. --MF-W 18:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Wonderful work, active, what's not to like? TCN7JM 18:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Rschen7754 18:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Mahgue (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Zieglhar (talk) 19:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Techman224Talk 19:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. LlamaAl (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Natuur12 (talk) 19:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Stryn (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep OK --►Cekli829 20:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep — TBloemink talk 20:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keept a r u s¡Dímelo! 20:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 21:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Wiki13 talk 22:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Southparkfan 23:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep   --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep I'm sure I disagree with this user on many levels, but he always promptly responds to calls for help fighting vandalism on smaller wikis, which is commendable. ~ DanielTom (talk) 23:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep MBisanz talk 03:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Glaisher [talk] 04:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep레비Revi 04:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep John Vandenberg (talk) 08:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep - He's an excellent steward, and has exceptional judgment. In my capacity as an individual, and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep up the good work Laaknor (talk) 13:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep - JurriaanH (talk) 14:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Pundit (talk) 16:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep IW 16:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Most possible weakest   Keep - There's no point in expressing my opinion, as I will get blown to bits. I do not like his handling at Simple, yet, I had some blame, but I really hated his response to a concern at Simple Wiktionary. But... keep, is where I'll go for now (I don't need to be embarrassed anymore) --Goldenburg111 16:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  Remove Unhelpful at Simple English Wiktionary, with no response to my questions, and has been a bit incivil. --Goldenburg111 17:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
@Goldenburg111: Where has he been uncivil? --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 14:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)


BencmqEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, & activity, steward actions counter | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: zh, en-3
  • Personal info: Hi all, this is my second confirmation as a steward. It has been an honour to serve as a steward for the past two years and a half (roughly). I have been rather inactive during the later part of 2013, overwhelmed with real life commitments. I appreciate the community's trust in the past and I would like to continue serving the community this year. Hopefully I'll be back to active duty in a month or two. Thanks for your support.

Comments about BencmqEdit


BennylinEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, & activity, steward actions counter | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: id, en-5, jv-3
  • Personal info: Hi, I would like to continue helping with steward duties for the next year if the community think that I have contributed as stewards for the past year. Thank you. Addendum: My past roles as stewards has been focused on SRs, and I also stand-by on steward's IRC channel on most days until couple months ago. If I'm confirmed again as a steward, I'm in the process of purchasing a new laptop to replace the broken one, and hopefully using my new machine I could be more active on IRC and answering requests.

Comments about BennylinEdit

  • Could you explain your nearly complete inactivity in the last few months? --MF-W 18:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    • RL stress over the past 6+ months... Thanks for the question. Bennylin 13:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Not a very stable contributor aren't you, hehehe.Ald™ (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  :) Well, historically I used to have near above 90% attendance-contrib on my home wiki... but that contribution had been diversified to wikt, ws, meta, and jv projects lately... Bennylin 13:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep OK --►Cekli829 20:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Activity levels are too low for my standards and have historically been on the low end of the spectrum. One month of the year with reasonable activity is not enough to justified continued access to the steward toolset, imo. Snowolf How can I help? 20:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral Activity is low. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 21:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove inactive as steward.--DangSunM (talk) 23:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Indonesian language skills are an advantage and I have found responsive to my requests through the year.  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral --Wiki13 talk 10:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep per sDrewth, it's good to have stewards with diverse skills. PiRSquared17 (talk) 12:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Pundit (talk) 16:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove --Alan (talk) 16:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep per PiRSquared17. periods of inactivity are not necessarily a problem. --Abd (talk) 17:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove -->   Keep per Billinghurst, but share criticism with inactivity. --Goldenburg111 18:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
    • If I were to choose one highlight of last year, I'd pick this. Thank you for your input/concern. I'll try to expand my profile more. Bennylin 13:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Zerabat (talk) 02:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep per sDrewth, and for their presence on old Wikisource. --Zyephyrus (talk) 11:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral an inactive stew is very useless thing but I hope user will return to his past activity. --Base (talk) 12:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral - Like Base. Guycn2 (talk) 17:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove due to inactivity. AGK [•] 19:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral I was about to vote remove, but the opinion of sDrewth makes me reconsider. Let's give him one more chance to be active ? -- Quentinv57 (talk) 22:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- per sDrewth. --Pratyya (Hello!) 05:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, not very active, but his language skills (Indonesian) is useful and he responds pretty quickly to requests Trijnsteltalk 18:18, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep per Trijnstel. Armbrust (talk) 05:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Reasonably active. Elfix 18:13, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. Activity is low, but not yet inactive.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:00, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Please become more active though. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:15, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:04, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Not the most active steward we have, but always engaged and only 1 month with no steward action. Vogone talk 11:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep this time, though I think more activity is needed going forward Courcelles 14:43, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, nothing to complain about. ;-) —DerHexer (Talk) 16:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Holder (talk) 06:24, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Gamma127 (talk) 15:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep language skills are useful and is still active enough to keep the rights IMO. Ajraddatz (Talk) 21:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -FASTILY 09:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 10:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, seems available enough for me. Jafeluv (talk) 13:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep - Hoo man (talk) 12:57, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


BillinghurstEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, & activity, steward actions counter | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en
  • Personal info: I plan to continue in the role of steward, if the community is willing to confirm me. I have pretty much undertaken the tasks I said that I would, the majority of it in global spam defences. My mop has been active and consistent in my areas of strength, and I have undertaken activities in other areas as required. Stewards have worked cooperatively and respectfully; as a team sharing the work, sharing advice and requesting assistance as necessary, some robust discussions, and it continues to be a harmonious and pleasant group with whom to work, and I commend them for their passion, diligence and efforts. — billinghurst  — billinghurst sDrewth

Comments about BillinghurstEdit

  •   Keep incredibly active, no concerns whatsoever. Snowolf How can I help? 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep No concerns. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Of course. --Alan (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep No serious concerns. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, no concerns. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Natuur12 (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. Érico Wouters msg 18:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep of course. TCN7JM 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep; rather active! --MF-W 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Very active with the spam blacklist and other steward activities. Certainly keep. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. Excellent work as a steward. LlamaAl (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Stryn (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep OK --►Cekli829 20:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep — TBloemink talk 20:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keept a r u s¡Dímelo! 21:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 21:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Obviously just symbolical   Keep... ;-) — Danny B. 21:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Highly active, experienced, and helpful. INeverCry 22:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Southparkfan 23:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep   --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep sure. --DangSunM (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep very active--Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep – active and competent, and more importantly, seems to have a good heart. ~ DanielTom (talk) 23:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, active, kind, helpful, respectable. Can I regard him as mentor? ;)--Kegns 01:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep MBisanz talk 03:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Glaisher [talk] 04:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Wiki13 talk 10:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- No issues. In my capacity as an individual, and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep sure. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep up the good work! Laaknor (talk) 13:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Pundit (talk) 16:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep IW 16:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Active, Nice and Hard Working. --Goldenburg111 16:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Evenhanded, stable, responsive. --Abd (talk) 17:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Dekel E (talk) 19:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, he is one of the most active stewards and he did a good job. --Zerabat (talk) 02:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Risker (talk) 02:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 02:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep레비Revi 06:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Höstblomma (talk) 12:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Base (talk) 12:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Guycn2 (talk) 17:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. AGK [•] 19:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Igorwindsor (talk) 19:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Hard working steward. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 22:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep - No problem.--Pratyya (Hello!) 05:54, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 10:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Defender (talk) 17:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep and strongly; hardworking, and the most active steward right now Trijnsteltalk 18:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Ganímedes (talk) 23:21, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:17, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, of course. Mathonius (talk) 12:13, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, he looks rather active. Elfix 18:14, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:31, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, great work. Bernard (talk) 20:06, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, wears the Super Steward T-shirt with pride. Invaluable. QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:39, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep I love you all~~ Bennylin 13:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   KeepTeles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 15:46, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Wim b / [ t ] 19:21, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   KeepArkanosis 11:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 13:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Courcelles 14:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 16:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove I'm against useless mass locks of "spambots" and thus I am not willing to see his term prolonged unless Billinghurst intends to change his rather liberal use of the lock button. Vogone talk 16:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
    I must say I do the same everytime I have the possibility. Maybe I missed your point but leaving tons of xrumer-generated accounts is, in best scenario, a breach of our security. --Vituzzu (talk) 17:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
    But I doubt you resist to unblock a mistakenly gblocked IP, which is what I mean with a, for my feeling, too liberal use of the buttons. Vogone talk 17:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
    I trust both you and Billinghurst so I'm pretty sure there's some misunderstanding. --Vituzzu (talk) 19:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
    Interested in the conjunction of ideas by Vogone, account locks are different from global IP blocks, so I am missing that point too, sounds personal. Apart from that the statements are an opinion not supported by fact. I have one of the highest block removal rates. Unblock requests are at SRG, open to all stewards, and visible to users, thoroughly reviewable. Show me a case where I have refused an unblock where I have mistakenly blocked an IP.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Comment Contentwise I agree with Vogone. I don't get anything out of locking accounts with no edits who will most likely never edit either (I did that for hundreds of socks in January which were created months ago and will never edit which is why I still don't think that this has been quite useful for Wikimedia); that was completely different a couple of years ago when real spambots created hundereds of index.php pages crosswiki on a daily base. Anyway, it's your time and as long as it doesn't harm anyone, I'm the last one to tell you how to spend your time on. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
    And I am against pointless locking of spambot accounts. The issue is what is pointless? There are numbers of accounts that are locked with zero edits as they have been caught by the abuse filters. There are numerous accounts that are created and spam (and those that attempt to spam) on creation, there are those that are created and haven't spammed, until some of them spam one/two/three/.../six (day|months) later. When I investigating active spam, when I detect the other spambot accounts, 'lock them when you see them' is my approach, rather than go back and have to clean up their mess later. I certainly don't trawl the wikis looking for lonely spambot accounts. Similarly, we have some spambots that go xwiki, and some that do not, some chose to globally lock, and others do not.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
    I think someone might say it's useless or almost useless but it is harmless for sure. I personally endorse lock on sight of software-generated accounts though the both views about it can peacefully live together ^^
    I must also underline the "index.php attack" (along with the "test, just a test" series) was just the preparation of the current ongoing spamming. I don't see any decrease in spam but simply more effective countermeasures. We are currently experiencing a peaceful period in spam because of the strong actions taken by many people including the extraordinary efforts by Billinghurst, Trijnstel, INC, Beetstra, etc. Above all the aggressive spam-pit blocking campaign, the deep inspections on loginwiki, the reactive management of the abusefilter and the solid use of blacklists and COI-bots gave us the incredible results of managing 850 wikis with few then a dozen of incredible volunteers. I don't think any paid webmaster ever made such a complete success on so many *open* wikis. --Vituzzu (talk) 00:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Holder (talk) 06:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove - blocking for Blockcount - no thanks. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:12, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Gamma127 (talk) 15:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Rillke (talk) 11:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -jkb- 20:33, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   KeepDoRD talk 14:56, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:54, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:13, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -FASTILY 09:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. Activitity levels are a bit low— oh wait, those were thousands. Jafeluv (talk) 13:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
    Seconded.   Keep. — Ivan Shmakov (dc) 10:58, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep - No problem.--KhabarNegar 12:03, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep - Hoo man (talk) 13:03, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


Bsadowski1Edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, & activity, steward actions counter | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en
  • Personal info: Since my last confirmation (2013), I've been very active in dealing with spambot accounts and crosswiki vandalism/abuse. I hope to continue working with my fellow stewards (and new stewards) and also focus on more tasks (such as right changes, etc). --Bsadowski1 (talk) 02:41, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments about Bsadowski1Edit

  •   Keep Vogone talk 18:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep very active, no concerns whatsoever. Snowolf How can I help? 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep no concerns. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral --Alan (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Active and I have no serious concerns. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep certainly. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Rschen7754 18:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. Érico Wouters msg 18:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep TCN7JM 18:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep; hardly steward activity beside spam-fighting, but ok. --MF-W 18:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep! LlamaAl (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Stryn (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep OK --►Cekli829 20:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep — TBloemink talk 20:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep of course.--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 21:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep   --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep MBisanz talk 03:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Glaisher [talk] 04:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Wiki13 talk 10:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep - In my capacity as an individual, and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Laaknor (talk) 13:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep obviously, by far exceeding any possible standards for an exemplary and outstanding steward in terms of activity Pundit (talk) 16:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Abd (talk) 17:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Zerabat (talk) 02:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Risker (talk) 02:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:06, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Base (talk) 12:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Guycn2 (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. AGK [•] 18:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Quentinv57 (talk) 22:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Pratyya (Hello!) 05:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep no concerns either Trijnsteltalk 18:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep up the good work!   It's a great pleasure having you as a fellow steward. Mathonius (talk) 11:30, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Good. Elfix 18:11, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Defender (talk) 20:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   KeepTeles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:52, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:08, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep I love you all~~ Bennylin 13:26, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Courcelles 14:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep doing a lot of good stuff without any mistakes. Keep on doing that! —DerHexer (Talk) 17:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 17:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • jo --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:17, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Hazard SJ 03:13, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Gamma127 (talk) 15:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   KeepDoRD talk 14:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:14, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -FASTILY 09:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, definitely. Does consistent useful work. Jafeluv (talk) 13:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 16:33, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep - Hoo man (talk) 13:05, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


DerHexerEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, & activity, steward actions counter | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1
  • Personal info: Dear readers,

    I'm one of the longest continuously serving stewards as I was elected back in December 2007. With my broad experience in handling steward actions, I'm not only dealing with almost all kinds of them (mostly via IRC) but also advise new stewards and help as a contact person between stewards, communities and developers. For that purpose, I created help pages and reports for the announced Single User Login finalisation in English and German, held a presentation about global administration at the German AdminConvention and about global administration and tools at Wikimania 2013 (last part by Hoo man; slides, video), had meetups with developers and functionaries involved, created a roadmap for that purpose etc. Looking back at my last year's confirmation page, I'm a bit disappointed in the progress of the SUL finalisation on the part of the Wikimedia Foundation but I'm confident that it will happen this year and I want to pull my weight.

    Last year, my lower activity depended on my master thesis and participation in the Board of Wikimedia Germany. As the latter (besides others) frustrated me a bit, I decided to take a break in September and came back much more actively. Further, my Board term expired and I didn't step up again; additionally, I'll finish my master next month. In the last weeks, I occupied myself with CheckUser activities mostly on loginwiki (in what I was not as experienced as in Oversight rights that I hold on metawiki and which were one my main steward activities) and closed a difficult crosswiki CheckUser case in collaboration with German, French and English CheckUsers. Besides, a couple of German administrators requested a removal of their sysop rights on my user talk page and I granted this request according to our policy which caused a couple of uncontroversial steward actions on one of my homewikis.

    Recently, I became a member of the steward election committee again (a job I did in the last couple of years too) and thus hope to approve some new fellows elected by the global community. I'd be happy to serve the community and my venerable fellows with my experience for the next term. Thank you!

Comments about DerHexerEdit

  •   Keep DerHexer's extensive experience as a steward is very much needed on the team, he has provided historical insight on past practices and their evolution over time many times in the past and is active and very competent. Snowolf How can I help? 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep No concerns. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Alan (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep DerHexer Der Amazing John F. Lewis (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. Érico Wouters msg 18:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    •   Remove this is unaccaptable for a steward. JurgenNL (talk) 06:34, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
      • Just read through it with Google Translate and didn't see any problems. Each candidate was presented neutrally, and then with some pros and cons, and there were no personal attacks. What about this made you change from keep to remove, exactly? Is it the idea, or the actual text (which does not seem to be attacking anyone)? Is your decision based in policy or your own opinion? PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:40, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
        • To me that doesn't seem any different from giving a detailed rational when voting, and is often done by people in large elections. I prefer to give my rational on the voting page (or not at all when there's a closed ballot), but I'm not sure how this is so different. Ajraddatz (Talk) 16:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. LlamaAl (talk) 18:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, sure. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Rschen7754 18:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep WOW, almost 1K(845) action on January.--Ald™ (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Stryn (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove I don't trust him. --►Cekli829 20:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    May I ask why? PiRSquared17 (talk) 20:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    Unexpected error is doing. For example, the following: [1] note that voting has not yet begun. --►Cekli829 20:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    Uhm that would even deserve a keelhauling :D --Vituzzu (talk) 20:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    One Member Election Committee should not make such mistakes. --►Cekli829 20:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    I agree: the eagerness to vote "Oppose", and his offensive "You're kidding us, aren't you?" comment, is both shocking and disappointing coming from a steward (not to mention a member of the Election Committee). ~ DanielTom (talk) 16:22, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
    I agree: Barras has done that offensive comment before, the "You're kidding" comment, which sickens me, but does not that much. I feel DerHexer has covered that comment. --Goldenburg111 17:22, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
    Apologies for once having lost my countenance when I saw this unpromising candidacy for the fifth time. Even though it's the truth, I should not have told it so rudely. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
    How can a sarcastic question be "the truth"? Vogone talk 16:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
    There was no sarcasm albeit impoliteness: It was as clear as mud that he would fail again, for the fifth time, as he still disrespects the community's unambiguous decision of the past years. I adhere to this view but regret my behaviour in edits and wording as this cannot change anything either. Which is why I am going to propose a limitation of candidacies. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:00, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
    All the issues which were brought up in the past were fixable and 1 year isn't that little time to do so. Thus, I don't understand why one needs to oppose without even awaiting the candidate's questions to possible answers etc. to see whether those issues have been fixed but rather to react in a bugged and impolite way. Whether a candidate has changed towards a good direction is something which should be evaluated by the community and not by eligibility limitations, in my opinion. And I clearly don't believe Cekli829 is trying to kid us but rather has some problems to understand the concerns raised and I don't think you have the right to constitute your assumption to be "the truth". Vogone talk 18:10, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
    I disagree with your view on his candidacies (and by renominating right after the last election he obviously has not fixed one issues which was raised the years before which I critized in a very rude, very impolite way on the wrong place, at the wrong time, in the wrong position) and kindly ask you for accepting my opinion. Besides, this is not the place to discuss limitations or Cekli's candidacy but my work in the past year and whether you trust me for another year. I can see my stupid mistake and regret my misbehaviour. Best regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep — TBloemink talk 20:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Obviously just symbolical   Keep... ;-) — Danny B. 21:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep I do trust him Natuur12 (talk) 22:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    •   Remove I'm sorry but this is a huge nono. Natuur12 (talk) 22:46, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Southparkfan 23:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep   --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep of course--DangSunM (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep - Avi (talk) 01:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep MBisanz talk 03:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Glaisher [talk] 04:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep I always admired his work as a steward and looked up to him as a role model. Good luck. --Meno25 (talk) 06:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep This, that and the other (talk) 06:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Wiki13 talk 10:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
    •   Neutral Because of this I don't want to support you anymore for now. I don't want to vote vote for remove either, so this is between both. --Wiki13 talk 12:30, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep - In my capacity as an individual and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep up the good work! Laaknor (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Mediatus (talk) 14:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Pundit (talk) 16:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep na gerade so ;) IW 16:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep everyone makes mistakes, DerHexer fixed his within 10 minutes. I wish everyone, including me, could be so swift. --Abd (talk) 17:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Goldenburg111 18:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  Remove I don't think a user who types about other users in a public wiki is an acceptable candidates, per User:Natuur12 --Goldenburg111 22:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Ironically, everyone commenting here is typing about other users in a public wiki. ;) Can you please explain why this is any different from just leaving a reason when supporting/opposing? Let me clarify: I respect your opinions. but don't see why this is a reason to oppose. PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:46, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Risker (talk) 02:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Zerabat (talk) 02:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep – I've only interacted with this user once or twice, but he seems like a great steward. TCN7JM 03:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep I don't trust him, but whatever. Nixón (wop!) 04:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep레비Revi 06:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Wim b / [ t ] 11:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Höstblomma (talk) 12:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:06, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep hopefully he's recalled that he shall be active. --Base (talk) 12:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
    When I've been inactive? —DerHexer (Talk) 12:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Stadtbaumeister24 (talk) 14:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Unterstrichmoepunterstrich (talk) 15:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Guycn2 (talk) 17:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, definitely. AGK [•] 18:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Kmw2700 (talk) 19:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Igorwindsor (talk) 19:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:06, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep I still love you ;-) -- Quentinv57 (talk) 22:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Krib (talk) 22:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Pratyya (Hello!) 05:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep of course, no reason to vote otherwise Trijnsteltalk 18:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, of course! It's an honor and a pleasure working with you as a steward. Also per Snowolf. Mathonius (talk) 11:55, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, all gut. Elfix 18:14, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Defender (talk) 21:01, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   KeepTeles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:01, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:18, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Theo10011 (talk) 13:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep+  @xqt 10:13, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep I love you all~~ Bennylin 13:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Bene* (talk) 19:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Aschmidt (talk) 21:02, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Wnme (talk) 21:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Stepro (talk) 22:17, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Enzian44 (talk) 22:29, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep per Cekli. --Nemo 22:36, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Chricho (talk) 01:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, but in respect of Cekli829 reproach, I hope you will be a bit more neutral in discussions. --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Good work, no complaints. Mach weiter so! :-) --Troubled @sset   Work    Talk    Mail   10:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   KeepArkanosis 11:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Nolispanmo (talk) 12:04, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Courcelles 14:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 16:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • rock in the storm still, as every year. --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:32, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Geolina163 (talk) 20:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Emergency doc (talk) 22:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Holder (talk) 06:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- there`s no cause (OK, his mother would maybe say something other ;)) that speaks against him. One of the less Wikimedians, I really would call "friend". And that also because of his work and activity here. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:16, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- trusted. Stefan64 (talk) 16:54, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Pankoken (talk) 18:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Na, klar! --Gamma127 (talk) 14:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep When reading this, it is obvious to me that he expresses his personal opinion. I do not always share it but that's no reason to remove the steward flag as requested by some users above. DerHexer did and will hopefully continue doing indispensable work in the WMF wiki farm. Thank you. -- Rillke (talk) 11:26, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -jkb- 20:34, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   KeepDoRD talk 14:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --denny (talk) 17:42, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Bubo 08:54, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Flugs (talk) 20:17, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:14, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -FASTILY 09:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 10:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. Active, helpful and devilishly handsome. Jafeluv (talk) 13:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --PerfektesChaos (talk) 20:01, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep - Hoo man (talk) 13:09, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Shisha-Tom 16:28, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


ElfixEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, & activity, steward actions counter | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: fr, en-3
  • Personal info: Hello! I would like to continue to serve as a steward. I was elected back in 2012. Most of the steward operations I have carried out here for the past two years were upon my own initiative or upon IRC requests. I do not plan to change my approach towards the steward tools, if the community is willing to support my confirmation. Elfix 17:32, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments about ElfixEdit


J.delanoyEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, & activity, steward actions counter | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en
  • Personal info: I apologize for my lateness in making my confirmation statement. I have given a lot of thought on whether to stand for reconfirmation this year or not. My activity level, while not terribly low in terms of raw actions, is admittedly quite erratic and sporadic. I think that I can still provide benefit to the project as a steward during those times that my real-life obligations allow me to participate here, but if people think that my activity levels are too low, I am willing to step down. J.delanoygabsadds 21:55, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments about J.delanoyEdit

  •   Keep Vogone talk 18:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep J.delanoy's activity levels are highly volatile, with generally half of the year of little to no activity, but they are significant enough for me to see a continued benefit in his rights being maintained. Snowolf How can I help? 18:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep No concerns. Not as active as he once was but still active enough. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Rschen7754 18:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep (weak support) --Alan (talk) 18:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep John F. Lewis (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. Érico Wouters msg 18:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove; months of total inactivity, no thanks. --MF-W 18:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep   --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Avi (talk) 01:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep no problems with their actions, some more would be beneficial  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep MBisanz talk 03:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep (weak) more helping hands are needed but activity levels are concerning. --Glaisher [talk] 04:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Wiki13 talk 10:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove; months of total inactivity --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Laaknor (talk) 13:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Pundit (talk) 16:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove not active --Goldenburg111 17:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep We need experienced stewards around, even if they only occasionally contribute. --Abd (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep support --►Cekli829 18:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Risker (talk) 02:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove, inactive for some months = seems to not need steward rights. --Zerabat (talk) 02:46, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep – the volatile activity doesn't concern me enough to oppose this confirmation, and the user has done otherwise well as a steward. TCN7JM 03:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep레비Revi 06:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Guycn2 (talk) 17:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. AGK [•] 18:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep J. is indeed inactive half of the year, but is active enough to me the rest of the year. Considering his actions since 2010, he is not that inactive. If he wants to continue to serve as a steward, I'm certainly not going to stand in the way. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 22:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Pratyya (Hello!) 05:59, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep a little doubt as he's not that active, but no concerns with their actions either Trijnsteltalk 18:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep per Snowolf. Armbrust (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. I agree with Quentinv57. Mathonius (talk) 11:31, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep per Ajraddatz. PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, reasonably active in the past 12 months, that's enough for me. Elfix 18:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. I have some very small concers with low activity and with being more active close to elections. However, he does a good job when around.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:55, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:08, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep I love you all~~ Bennylin 13:26, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral Unfortunately, never seen before.--Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Sufficiently active, when active Courcelles 14:49, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, nothing to complain about. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • continues to have my trust --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:31, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -FASTILY 09:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, very useful steward. Jafeluv (talk) 13:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 16:32, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep - Hoo man (talk) 13:13, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


Jon Harald SøbyEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, & activity, steward actions counter | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en
  • Personal info: I am not seeking confirmation as a steward. When I was elected last year, I thought I would have a lot of time for steward tasks, but this turned out not to be true, and I have not had the time to do what I was supposed to do. So, to my fellow stewards: best of luck; and as always: see you at Wikimania! Jon Harald Søby (talk) 14:57, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments about Jon Harald SøbyEdit

  • Thank you for your years of service! Rschen7754 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your work as Steward. --Alan (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • A pity that you didn't become active in this "term", but thanks for having volunteered in the last election and for stepping down in this calm way. --MF-W 18:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Thank you for all your work as a steward, and I hope to see you continue to be active in other parts of Wikimedia. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • On March you perform 6 action, you tried your best, Thank you for all your work as steward.Ald™ (talk) 18:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanx! MoiraMoira (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Congratulations! Thanks for your work as Steward. Success in their work. --►Cekli829 21:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks for work!--DangSunM (talk) 23:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Thank you very much!! -- Avi (talk) 00:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks! MBisanz talk 03:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Thank you for all your previous work. Wishing you the best in your life. --Meno25 (talk) 06:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • No norwegian stewards any more? :( Laaknor (talk) 13:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Come back if you can! --Abd (talk) 17:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your work. Congrats! --Zerabat (talk) 02:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Best wishes to you. Thank you for your work, which has spanned many years and many areas. Risker (talk) 02:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your service John. Best on luck on future endeavors. — ΛΧΣ21 04:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Per Laaknor.--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:50, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Please..... Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Thank you! Guycn2 (talk) 17:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your years of service. AGK [•] 18:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Many thanks for the work you've done as a steward ! -- Quentinv57 (talk) 23:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your work as a steward.   --Pratyya (Hello!) 06:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your help. Trijnsteltalk 18:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your help as a steward! Good luck in your future endeavours. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:20, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Quite sad. Would have liked to see you active again. Thanks for your help in the past! :-) —DerHexer (Talk) 17:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • we owe you a lot, Jon; please, continue in orbit more broadly and best of luck :) --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Holder (talk) 06:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Hazard SJ 03:10, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
{{keep}} -jkb- 20:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC) oh Jon, I have just seen your notice above - thank you much for your serving us! -jkb- 20:36, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Hope to see you around! Legoktm (talk) 07:15, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Thanks! for your work. Hoping you come again some day. -- Zyephyrus (talk) 10:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your wørk as a steward. Jafeluv (talk) 13:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


JusjihEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, & activity, steward actions counter | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: zh-hant, zh-hans-3, en-3, fr-1
  • Personal info: Hello everyone. Natively using traditional Chinese, I became a steward in December 2007. In the past year, I mostly processed Steward requests/Bot status and Steward requests/Permissions, while also checking on other steward requests. Always remembering my role in the wiki community, I look forward to serving the wiki for another year. Leaving a message to my Meta talk page will also email me a notice of its posting.--Jusjih (talk) 06:28, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments about JusjihEdit

  •   Keep Only concern is a lack of activity, but he's still active enough to do a good job. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Lack activity. --Alan (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Activity levels throught the year have been incredibly low, not even one month with more than 10 actions. Sorry, but I see no need for the steward toolset. Snowolf How can I help? 20:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove inactive as steward.--DangSunM (talk) 23:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep no issues with their actions taken, language skills useful  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove He opened de-adminship request on ko.wikisource (see s:ko:위키문헌:관리자 선거/Caffelice (De-adminship)), and then he requested removal of this user's Admin and Crat access on Jan 2013 (See here). At that moment, AAR was not a policy, and he should have communicated with kowikisource community first before filing De-adminship request or requesting other stewards to his rights to be removed. —레비Revi 04:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
    I don't see the problem. He filed a request for de-adminship, and then requested it to stewards. Inactivity policies were not involved, but rather the community decided to desysop (I think). PiRSquared17 (talk) 04:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
    All support wothout 배우는사람 were not an active contributor of kowikisource(they had -50 contributions as of now and when the vote started), but an active contributor of kowiki. Because they are not actively contributing to kowikisource, it cannot be real community decision. —레비Revi 05:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
    But does kows have criteria for voters in there? --Base (talk) 12:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove, Inactive. --Wiki13 talk 10:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, for his work on en.wikiquote, though I don't always agree with his positions. ~ DanielTom (talk) 15:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Inactive at enwikiquote. --Goldenburg111 16:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep per DanielTom. However, if removed, thanks to this steward for his efforts. --Abd (talk) 17:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep support --►Cekli829 19:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Inactive. Érico Wouters msg 22:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral, low activity level, but at least do a few actions every month. --Zerabat (talk) 02:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove – Barely active with the steward toolset. TCN7JM 03:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove I know you're 3rd Chinese Steward, however you're too inactive. BTW how about sysop of PhiLiP.--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Inactive steward = useless steward. Useless steward = remove. Sad. --Base (talk) 12:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Guycn2 (talk) 17:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove. AGK [•] 19:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral Jusjih focuses on user rights requests. That's why he has not as much actions as stewards locking tons of spambots. As far as I know there were no problems with the actions taken. Like most people in favour of removal, I'd like to see Jusjih more active, but I'm not opposing at this stage. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 23:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral per Quentinv57. --Pratyya (Hello!) 06:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral per Quentinv57 Trijnsteltalk 18:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Armbrust (talk) 05:24, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. I see no inactivity, but low activity. If that is the ammount or work he want to give us as volunteer, I wouldn't even require more activity from him as all I see is a benefit from having him as a stwward.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 15:53, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep I agree with Teles here. Vogone talk 14:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove inactive Courcelles 15:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep to compensate Base's quite rude comment. People are never useless. No matter if they are inactive or just rarely active on Wikimedia. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -jkb- 20:37, 19 February 2014 (UTC) full trust
  •   Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:52, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Concerns with limited recent activity. -FASTILY 09:22, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral. Quentinv57 put it quite well. Concerns about activity level, but not enough to oppose confirmation. Jafeluv (talk) 13:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep because he has continous activity over the year, while others are absent for months and still get nearly only confirm votes. --MF-W 18:45, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. I see no inactivity, but low activity. That is the amount of work as volunteer,--KhabarNegar 11:57, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


JyothisEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, & activity, steward actions counter | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en
  • Personal info: 2013 was a very busy year in the real life and my main contribution was in being available on the IRC channel for emergencies and global locks and blocks to help CV fellows. If the community trusts me with the tools, I would like to continue for another year in the role and work with the community.

Comments about JyothisEdit


LeinadEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, & activity, steward actions counter | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en
  • Personal info: This steward did not create their confirmation page before the start of the comment phase. Page created on behalf of the Election Committee by Snowolf

Comments about LeinadEdit

  •   Remove No statement and only 2 actions this year. Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove per Vogone --Aftab1995 (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove completely inactive this year except for 2 actions, did not create his own confirmation statement. Snowolf How can I help? 18:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove inactive. --Alan (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove per above John F. Lewis (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Inactive. Érico Wouters msg 18:41, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove per above. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove, inactive. TCN7JM 18:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove JurgenNL (talk) 18:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove, total inactivity. --MF-W 18:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Only 2 action for user right per November.Ald™ (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove, too inactive. Techman224Talk 19:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Per Snowolf. odder (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Why? Is there a time limit? Then get automatic Confirm... --►Cekli829 20:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Inactive as steward.--DangSunM (talk) 23:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove seems to have disappeared, no statement is not a good sign  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove per others. --Glaisher [talk] 04:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Per others. --Wiki13 talk 10:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Abd (talk) 17:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove --Goldenburg111 18:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
    @Goldenburg111: What is so funny? Vogone talk 18:40, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
    • @Vogone: Sorry... I thought it was some random newbie... --Goldenburg111 23:32, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove, inactive as steward. --Zerabat (talk) 01:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Removeper above, especially PER VOGONE.--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:48, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove -- No statement. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:13, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove I don't care about statements but user shall not be completely inactive. But he unfortunately is. --Base (talk) 12:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove - not inactive... Guycn2 (talk) 18:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
    Do you mean just "inactive"? Not being inactive is basically the same as being active, which is not a reason to remove. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove due to inactivity. AGK [•] 18:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove only because of no statement.--Jusjih (talk) 21:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove per above, sadly. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 23:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove I see no reason to support him per Vogone.--Pratyya (Hello!) 06:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • He already got enough opposes... sad that he's this inactive. Trijnsteltalk 18:38, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Leinad is inactive not only as steward, but also as editor, sysop, bureaucrat (on pl wiki; I don't know how about CU). For me it is obvious: no activity = no flags. Einsbor (talk) 20:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove per above. Armbrust (talk) 05:26, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove per inactivity. Thanks for offering help tough.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove I don't think statements are that important, but he's completely inactive. Defender (talk) 22:13, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove because of inactivity. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:22, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral. Who is he?.. --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Didn't create statement, this should be an automatic removal. Courcelles 15:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral Will loose his rights due to our policy, what a pity. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove -- he don't want to be longer Steward Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:22, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Legoktm (talk) 07:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove -FASTILY 09:19, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove, inactive. Jafeluv (talk) 13:17, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Who is he?--KhabarNegar 11:52, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


M7Edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, & activity, steward actions counter | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en-3, it, de-1, es-1, fr-1
  • Personal info: I am a Steward since 2006 and I'm willing to continue this service for another year. I plan to be slightly more active at least in dealing with RfP and in fighting cross wiki issues. I follow the mailing list and monitor meta.wiki logs and RfP page. I also can be reached on meta user talk page, that is set to E-mail me when changed. [Adde]: on last December I sent an application to serve the Ombudsman Commission and it has been accepted for next term, so there will be an interesting and entirely new set of problems, luckily well supported by other expert members of the commission. To enable better communication, I have restored my IRC client, also there my nick is "m7" (wikipedia/m7).

Comments about M7Edit

  •   Remove I prefer ombudsmen not to serve as stewards during their OC term. Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Aplasia (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Alan (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. Érico Wouters msg 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep fine by me. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:54, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Became active again and has valuable experience. --MF-W 19:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Stryn (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep The significant bump in M7's activity last month is, I hope, an indication of things to come, for I would not be supporting continued access to the steward toolset otherwise. Snowolf How can I help? 21:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep — TBloemink talk 20:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Rschen7754 23:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep   --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep MBisanz talk 03:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Be more active this year :) --Glaisher [talk] 04:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Wiki13 talk 10:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep - In my capacity as an individual and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove Ombudsmans should not be also stewards. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 14:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Pundit (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 17:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep prefer to keep Ombudsmen if they use rights with caution. No problems noted. --Abd (talk) 18:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep always been much more than correct and wise --g (talk) 23:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove --Goldenburg111 00:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Risker (talk) 02:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral --Zerabat (talk) 02:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep – I've encountered M7 a few times while I was doing antivandalism work on the Simple English Wikipedia. Have no reason to believe given my limited interactions with him along with basic preliminary research that he should be removed from stewardship. TCN7JM 03:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove I agree with Vogone. Ombudsmen should not be stewards while he is ombudsmen... —레비Revi 06:59, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Delfort (talk) 10:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Wim b / [ t ] 11:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Ask21 (talk) 13:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. AGK [•] 19:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral I don't think that the roles of steward and ombudsman are incompatible. However, it may be wise to drop the steward bit during your term to entirely focus on the ombudsman work. But it remains your choice ;) -- Quentinv57 (talk) 23:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Thank you Quentinv57 for your words of encouragement in this new work. Actually, when I submitted my application, I wrote Maggie that I was aware that, in the past, Stewards were requested to abstain and that my right would have removed and eventually restored at the end of the term. When selected, I have been told that the WMF requires to abstain in any case where the role as a steward may constitute a conflict of interest. Since my main activity is dealing with users' permission grant and removal, and I give a hand with countervandalism, I can definitely avoid CU and OS activities. Stewards, noted Maggie, are many more than OC commissioners but have various different requests, and sometimes it's useful to have somebody around. In any case, I am committed in making clear notes in order to allow other people to fully understand any use of tools; the whole wiki community counts on your and other fellow Stewards careful supervision of the logs. Ciao, M/ (talk) 00:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
      Thank you for your answer. I'm more concerned about the workload that comes with the ombudsman status than about the possible conflicts of interest. To me, if you really take on the ombudsman responsability and keep the steward bit too, you will have a lot of work for 2014. Anyway, thanks for volunteering on this. And good luck if you still want to hold concurrently the two statuses :) -- Quentinv57 (talk) 14:33, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Pratyya (Hello!) 06:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep fine by me (nothing against combi steward-OC) Trijnsteltalk 18:39, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Dome A disposizione! 22:19, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Euphydryas (talk) 22:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:27, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Good (despite the OC role). Elfix 18:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Defender (talk) 21:11, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Eumolpo (talk) 16:37, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep I love you all~~ Bennylin 13:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   KeepTeles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 15:48, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Natuur12 (talk) 17:31, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep although I'm not happy with stewards being ombudsman at the same time but if you stay kinda active, I'm fine. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Holder (talk) 06:27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Nungalpiriggal (talk) 15:39, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove -- per Vogone. Collecting positions is a problem at Wikimedia projects. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:23, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:49, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -FASTILY 09:22, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 05:29, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral, per the Ombudsmen/ Steward conflicts raised above - Hoo man (talk) 13:21, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


MardetanhaEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, & activity, steward actions counter | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: fa, az, en, tr-2
  • Personal info: This year my activity was in moderate-level, and I assume I can do my job for another year, I have been available on IRC almost most of the year to handle emergencies situation specially those requested on IRC, With the communities trust, I wish to serve community next year. Mardetanha talk 08:21, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments about MardetanhaEdit

  •   Keep --Alan (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --►Cekli829 19:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep The activity levels are on the low end of the spectrum, but consistent. I would like to see more activity in the coming year. Snowolf How can I help? 21:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   KeepDanny B. 21:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep   --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep language skills useful  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep MBisanz talk 03:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Glaisher [talk] 04:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Wiki13 talk 10:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep - In my capacity as an individual and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep per Snowolf --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep up the good work! Laaknor (talk) 13:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Pundit (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep IW 16:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Abd (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Risker (talk) 02:49, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, per Billinghurst and Snowolf. --Zerabat (talk) 02:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep – Never personally interacted with this user, but seems like a good steward. TCN7JM 03:27, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. Though I would like to see more actions this year. LlamaAl (talk) 03:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--danghula (talk) 05:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   KeepSicaspi (talk) 07:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Guycn2 (talk) 18:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. AGK [•] 19:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Neutral -- Quentinv57 (talk) 23:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Pratyya (Hello!) 06:07, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Mehran Debate 09:07, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Remove --Kasir talk 10:16, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 10:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep--ماني (talk) 10:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep H.Fatemi 10:52, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep not very active but a Farsi speaking steward can't hurt Trijnsteltalk 18:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Defender (talk) 18:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep بشرزاد (talk) 04:59, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:31, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:34, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep. --Dan.- (talk) 19:28, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep I love you all~~ Bennylin 13:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   KeepTeles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 15:54, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep Not incredibly active but still continuously involved. Vogone talk 11:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, haven't heard of any mistakes. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep, good luck! In fact ( contact ) 04:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  •   Keep --Holder (talk) 06:29, 17 February 2014 (UTC)