Stewards/Confirm/2014

The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.


AmquiEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: fr-N, en-4, es-1, it-1 (mic/cr-0.5)
  • Personal info: I have issues in real life that I don't want to expose here. I'm confident I will come back one day, but I understand if people would vote against my confirmation. Thanks for everybody, Amqui (talk) 23:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC) Note: Prior to the statement's addition, users saw and commented on a placeholder statement.

Comments about AmquiEdit

  • Keep Keep the greatest user on Wikimedia. Vogone talk 18:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove has been completely inactive since October and did not even create his own statement. I also still hold Peter's view that not creating a confirmation statement should leave to removal, almost regardless of other things, as the user has had a full month to do so. Snowolf How can I help? 18:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I'm OK with Amqui keeping the rights despite being unavailable right now; there could be some good real-life justification in this case. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Alan (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep (weak) if he wants to. My interactions with this user have been very positive, and I am very pleased with their work on- and off- wiki, but it is true he is not very active. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove per Snowolf, but I am open to changing my !vote if there is good justification for his absence. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • I miss you! --Rschen7754 18:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove exact same as what Mh7kJ said. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove A very kind and reasonable user but nearly totally inactive as a steward, also already in the time when he still was active otherwise. --MF-W 18:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Inactive. Érico Wouters msg 18:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove November, December, January?--Ald™ (talk) 19:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep ok FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove, you should be more active. --Stryn (talk) 19:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Technically Amqui did run into the inactivity policy of stewards, although that policy does not seem to be in force.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    There are differing interpretations of the inactivity clause of the steward policy and I would say that given we hold yearly reconfirmations it's much easier to just handle it this way. Some day we should take a serious look at removing it. Snowolf How can I help? 06:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Not active, even no statement created rubin16 (talk) 19:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Too inactive, with only 39 log entries in 2013 and none in 2014. Plus you didn't write a statement. Techman224Talk 19:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Inactive. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 21:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove, Inactive. --Wiki13 talk 22:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral I agree both sides--DangSunM (talk) 23:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Face-smile.svg --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral as no issues with any of their work, though not making a confirmation statement seems tantamount to a resignation  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove reasonable user but not very active. --Glaisher [talk] 04:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove No statement created --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove no statement = removal Laaknor (talk) 13:22, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral no statement, per Billinghurst. --Abd (talk) 17:21, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove inactive + no statement --Goldenburg111 18:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove, per above. --Zerabat (talk) 02:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove – stewards should be active. TCN7JM 03:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove1. Per Jasper Deng; 2. We have full En-3~En-N, and they're at least bilingual.--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Great user but inactive steward. --Base (talk) 12:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Guycn2 (talk) 17:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove due to inactivity. AGK [•] 18:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Kmw2700 (talk) 19:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Rome2 (talk) 21:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove What Base said. And for sure I would have preferred voting something else here... :/ -- Quentinv57 (talk) 21:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove -- We need active stewards which Amqui isn't. --Pratyya (Hello!) 05:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove per user req -FASTILY 12:43, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral not very active, but no issues with their work either; neutral due to the reason for his inactivity Trijnsteltalk 18:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove} per Snowolf. Armbrust (talk) 05:07, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove. Thanks for your work, Amqui, but I feel you haven't been active enough since your election to remain a steward for another year. I hope you'll someday get the chance to become more active again. Mathonius (talk) 11:25, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, give him a chance. --Midnight Gambler (talk) 14:14, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, per AGF. Please become more active, Amqui. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:05, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. He does a good job, even if is not very active for the moment. Cantons-de-l'Est (talk) 18:47, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Would be open to re-election with a half-year or more of sustained activity, but, like others have sad, good eprson, not active enough for the role. Courcelles 14:39, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, cannot remember any mistakes. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:49, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I'm very confident about Amqui. A very serious and devoted contributor. He did a great job. Everyone can have personal issues that have consequences on its Wikimedia activity. --Deansfa (talk) 18:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove inactive --Holder (talk) 06:21, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove - per Snowolf. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove per Marcus Cyron --Gamma127 (talk) 15:00, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Remy34 (talk) 18:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove inactive. Legoktm (talk) 07:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove, sadly inactive. Jafeluv (talk) 12:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep "real life" --KhabarNegar 12:06, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


AvrahamEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en, he-2
  • Personal info: Once again, I am pleased to see that the current body of stewards has, in the main, been able to support the corpus of Wikimedia projects relatively efficiently. I would like to continue supporting the projects as a steward, especially with global renames hopefully arriving this year, as I have years of experience with renames on my home wiki. I will also be serving as a member of the m:Ombudsman commission during 2014. Thank you for your past trust, and I hope to be able to continue to deserve it for this coming year.

Comments about AvrahamEdit

  • Remove Remove I prefer ombudsmen not to serve as stewards during their OC term. Vogone talk 18:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Active as a steward, no need to remove the rights for their term on OC I'd think. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Alan (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Aftab1995 (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Active. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Érico Wouters msg 18:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Rschen7754 18:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Stewards do more than just checkusers and oversights. The other activities stewards do are not private. Techman224Talk 19:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove per Vogone, OC activity should be independent from the activities it audits. Montgomery (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, no problems. --Stryn (talk) 19:40, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Shou;d not be an ombusman while steward. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 21:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Wiki13 talk 22:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Face-smile.svg --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep MBisanz talk 03:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep An excellent team member. This, that and the other (talk) 06:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep In my capacity as an individual, and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep no problems for me. Laaknor (talk) 13:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Pundit (talk) 16:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I have seen us lose one of the best stewards over the alleged COI. --Abd (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Risker (talk) 01:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral --Zerabat (talk) 02:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep – Haven't ever personally interacted with the user, but seems like a good steward. TCN7JM 03:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Guycn2 (talk) 17:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, though I hope Avi will restrain his activity until his OC term ends. AGK [•] 18:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral I don't think that the roles of steward and ombudsman are incompatible. However, it may be wise to drop the steward bit during your term to entirely focus on the ombudsman work. But it remains your choice ;) -- Quentinv57 (talk) 22:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep No problem --Pratyya (Hello!) 05:48, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral only active around the confirmations, has too many buttons and isn't able to use them all (nothing against combi steward-OC) Trijnsteltalk 18:06, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
    • At second thought I was a bit harsh, so changed from remove -> neutral; my opinion still stands though. Trijnsteltalk 23:02, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:10, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove, per Vogone. Bernard (talk) 14:53, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per TCN7JM. --Midnight Gambler (talk) 14:55, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, no problems IMO, experienced enough, active enough. PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, although I am hostile to being both a steward and an OC member. Elfix 18:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Vivaelcelta (talk) 20:38, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Defender (talk) 20:57, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepTeles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:59, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:14, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Dan.- (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I love you all~~ Bennylin 13:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep although I'm not happy with stewards being ombudsman at the same time but if you stay kinda active, I'm fine. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:51, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • of course --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove -- per Vogone. Collecting positions is a big problem. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Gamma127 (talk) 15:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepDoRD talk 15:12, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -FASTILY 09:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. OC doesn't require members to relinquish steward tools anymore, and there's still plenty of steward stuff Avi can do without conflict with the OC role. Jafeluv (talk) 12:53, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 16:58, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Hoo man (talk) 12:53, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


BarrasEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: de, en-4, fr-1
  • Personal info: This is my third steward confirmation, as I've been elected in 2011. I've been quite active during this year of services. I've used the steward tools for various purposes, such as helping with crosswiki deletions and blocks. I also dealt with vandalism and spam and locked and blocked many users and IPs. I also did some right changes, mainly to my own account to prevent more abuse and to remove abusive things, but also changed many other people's rights. I usually help everywhere, where help is needed, on IRC and also on-wiki. If you've any question, just ask me.

Comments about BarrasEdit

  • Keep Keep Vogone talk 18:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep very active, no concerns whatsoever. Snowolf How can I help? 18:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Per above, no concerns. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Alan (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Seen him on wikitech, and many more.Ald™ (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Excellent steward, no concerns. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I agree with all comments above mine. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Active and no concerns with their work at all. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Active and sensible. --MF-W 18:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Wonderful work, active, what's not to like? TCN7JM 18:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Rschen7754 18:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Mahgue (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Zieglhar (talk) 19:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Techman224Talk 19:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. LlamaAl (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Natuur12 (talk) 19:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Stryn (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep OK --►Cekli829 20:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep — TBloemink talk 20:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keept a r u s¡Dímelo! 20:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 21:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Wiki13 talk 22:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Southparkfan 23:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--DangSunM (talk) 23:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Face-smile.svg --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I'm sure I disagree with this user on many levels, but he always promptly responds to calls for help fighting vandalism on smaller wikis, which is commendable. ~ DanielTom (talk) 23:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep MBisanz talk 03:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Glaisher [talk] 04:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep레비Revi 04:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep John Vandenberg (talk) 08:12, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - He's an excellent steward, and has exceptional judgment. In my capacity as an individual, and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep up the good work Laaknor (talk) 13:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - JurriaanH (talk) 14:04, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Pundit (talk) 16:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep IW 16:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Most possible weakest Keep Keep - There's no point in expressing my opinion, as I will get blown to bits. I do not like his handling at Simple, yet, I had some blame, but I really hated his response to a concern at Simple Wiktionary. But... keep, is where I'll go for now (I don't need to be embarrassed anymore) --Goldenburg111 16:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Remove Remove Unhelpful at Simple English Wiktionary, with no response to my questions, and has been a bit incivil. --Goldenburg111 17:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
@Goldenburg111: Where has he been uncivil? --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 14:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)


BencmqEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: zh, en-3
  • Personal info: Hi all, this is my second confirmation as a steward. It has been an honour to serve as a steward for the past two years and a half (roughly). I have been rather inactive during the later part of 2013, overwhelmed with real life commitments. I appreciate the community's trust in the past and I would like to continue serving the community this year. Hopefully I'll be back to active duty in a month or two. Thanks for your support.

Comments about BencmqEdit


BennylinEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: id, en-5, jv-3
  • Personal info: Hi, I would like to continue helping with steward duties for the next year if the community think that I have contributed as stewards for the past year. Thank you. Addendum: My past roles as stewards has been focused on SRs, and I also stand-by on steward's IRC channel on most days until couple months ago. If I'm confirmed again as a steward, I'm in the process of purchasing a new laptop to replace the broken one, and hopefully using my new machine I could be more active on IRC and answering requests.

Comments about BennylinEdit

  • Could you explain your nearly complete inactivity in the last few months? --MF-W 18:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    • RL stress over the past 6+ months... Thanks for the question. Bennylin 13:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Not a very stable contributor aren't you, hehehe.Ald™ (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • :) Well, historically I used to have near above 90% attendance-contrib on my home wiki... but that contribution had been diversified to wikt, ws, meta, and jv projects lately... Bennylin 13:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep OK --►Cekli829 20:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Activity levels are too low for my standards and have historically been on the low end of the spectrum. One month of the year with reasonable activity is not enough to justified continued access to the steward toolset, imo. Snowolf How can I help? 20:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Activity is low. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 21:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove inactive as steward.--DangSunM (talk) 23:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Indonesian language skills are an advantage and I have found responsive to my requests through the year.  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral --Wiki13 talk 10:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per sDrewth, it's good to have stewards with diverse skills. PiRSquared17 (talk) 12:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Pundit (talk) 16:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove --Alan (talk) 16:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per PiRSquared17. periods of inactivity are not necessarily a problem. --Abd (talk) 17:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove --> Keep Keep per Billinghurst, but share criticism with inactivity. --Goldenburg111 18:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
    • If I were to choose one highlight of last year, I'd pick this. Thank you for your input/concern. I'll try to expand my profile more. Bennylin 13:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Zerabat (talk) 02:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per sDrewth, and for their presence on old Wikisource. --Zyephyrus (talk) 11:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral an inactive stew is very useless thing but I hope user will return to his past activity. --Base (talk) 12:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral - Like Base. Guycn2 (talk) 17:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove due to inactivity. AGK [•] 19:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral I was about to vote remove, but the opinion of sDrewth makes me reconsider. Let's give him one more chance to be active ? -- Quentinv57 (talk) 22:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- per sDrewth. --Pratyya (Hello!) 05:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, not very active, but his language skills (Indonesian) is useful and he responds pretty quickly to requests Trijnsteltalk 18:18, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per Trijnstel. Armbrust (talk) 05:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Reasonably active. Elfix 18:13, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Activity is low, but not yet inactive.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:00, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Please become more active though. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:15, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:04, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Not the most active steward we have, but always engaged and only 1 month with no steward action. Vogone talk 11:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep this time, though I think more activity is needed going forward Courcelles 14:43, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, nothing to complain about. ;-) —DerHexer (Talk) 16:55, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Holder (talk) 06:24, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Gamma127 (talk) 15:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep language skills are useful and is still active enough to keep the rights IMO. Ajraddatz (Talk) 21:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -FASTILY 09:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 10:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, seems available enough for me. Jafeluv (talk) 13:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Hoo man (talk) 12:57, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


BillinghurstEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en
  • Personal info: I plan to continue in the role of steward, if the community is willing to confirm me. I have pretty much undertaken the tasks I said that I would, the majority of it in global spam defences. My mop has been active and consistent in my areas of strength, and I have undertaken activities in other areas as required. Stewards have worked cooperatively and respectfully; as a team sharing the work, sharing advice and requesting assistance as necessary, some robust discussions, and it continues to be a harmonious and pleasant group with whom to work, and I commend them for their passion, diligence and efforts. — billinghurst  — billinghurst sDrewth

Comments about BillinghurstEdit

  • Keep Keep incredibly active, no concerns whatsoever. Snowolf How can I help? 18:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep No concerns. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Of course. --Alan (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep No serious concerns. John F. Lewis (talk) 18:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, no concerns. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Natuur12 (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Érico Wouters msg 18:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep of course. TCN7JM 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep; rather active! --MF-W 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Very active with the spam blacklist and other steward activities. Certainly keep. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Excellent work as a steward. LlamaAl (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Stryn (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep OK --►Cekli829 20:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep — TBloemink talk 20:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keept a r u s¡Dímelo! 21:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 21:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Obviously just symbolical Keep Keep... ;-) — Danny B. 21:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Highly active, experienced, and helpful. INeverCry 22:37, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Southparkfan 23:19, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Face-smile.svg --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep sure. --DangSunM (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep very active--Hosiryuhosi (talk) 23:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep – active and competent, and more importantly, seems to have a good heart. ~ DanielTom (talk) 23:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Avi (talk) 00:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, active, kind, helpful, respectable. Can I regard him as mentor? ;)--Kegns 01:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep MBisanz talk 03:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Glaisher [talk] 04:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Meno25 (talk) 06:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Wiki13 talk 10:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- No issues. In my capacity as an individual, and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep sure. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep up the good work! Laaknor (talk) 13:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Pundit (talk) 16:06, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep IW 16:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Active, Nice and Hard Working. --Goldenburg111 16:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Evenhanded, stable, responsive. --Abd (talk) 17:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Dekel E (talk) 19:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, he is one of the most active stewards and he did a good job. --Zerabat (talk) 02:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Risker (talk) 02:40, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 02:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep레비Revi 06:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Höstblomma (talk) 12:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Base (talk) 12:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Guycn2 (talk) 17:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. AGK [•] 19:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Igorwindsor (talk) 19:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Hard working steward. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 22:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - No problem.--Pratyya (Hello!) 05:54, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 10:34, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Defender (talk) 17:57, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep and strongly; hardworking, and the most active steward right now Trijnsteltalk 18:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Ganímedes (talk) 23:21, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:17, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, of course. Mathonius (talk) 12:13, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, he looks rather active. Elfix 18:14, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:31, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, great work. Bernard (talk) 20:06, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, wears the Super Steward T-shirt with pride. Invaluable. QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:39, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I love you all~~ Bennylin 13:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepTeles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 15:46, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Wim b / [ t ] 19:21, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Midnight Gambler (talk) 10:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepArkanosis 11:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 13:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Courcelles 14:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 16:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove I'm against useless mass locks of "spambots" and thus I am not willing to see his term prolonged unless Billinghurst intends to change his rather liberal use of the lock button. Vogone talk 16:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
    I must say I do the same everytime I have the possibility. Maybe I missed your point but leaving tons of xrumer-generated accounts is, in best scenario, a breach of our security. --Vituzzu (talk) 17:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
    But I doubt you resist to unblock a mistakenly gblocked IP, which is what I mean with a, for my feeling, too liberal use of the buttons. Vogone talk 17:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
    I trust both you and Billinghurst so I'm pretty sure there's some misunderstanding. --Vituzzu (talk) 19:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
    Interested in the conjunction of ideas by Vogone, account locks are different from global IP blocks, so I am missing that point too, sounds personal. Apart from that the statements are an opinion not supported by fact. I have one of the highest block removal rates. Unblock requests are at SRG, open to all stewards, and visible to users, thoroughly reviewable. Show me a case where I have refused an unblock where I have mistakenly blocked an IP.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment Comment Contentwise I agree with Vogone. I don't get anything out of locking accounts with no edits who will most likely never edit either (I did that for hundreds of socks in January which were created months ago and will never edit which is why I still don't think that this has been quite useful for Wikimedia); that was completely different a couple of years ago when real spambots created hundereds of index.php pages crosswiki on a daily base. Anyway, it's your time and as long as it doesn't harm anyone, I'm the last one to tell you how to spend your time on. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
    And I am against pointless locking of spambot accounts. The issue is what is pointless? There are numbers of accounts that are locked with zero edits as they have been caught by the abuse filters. There are numerous accounts that are created and spam (and those that attempt to spam) on creation, there are those that are created and haven't spammed, until some of them spam one/two/three/.../six (day|months) later. When I investigating active spam, when I detect the other spambot accounts, 'lock them when you see them' is my approach, rather than go back and have to clean up their mess later. I certainly don't trawl the wikis looking for lonely spambot accounts. Similarly, we have some spambots that go xwiki, and some that do not, some chose to globally lock, and others do not.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
    I think someone might say it's useless or almost useless but it is harmless for sure. I personally endorse lock on sight of software-generated accounts though the both views about it can peacefully live together ^^
    I must also underline the "index.php attack" (along with the "test, just a test" series) was just the preparation of the current ongoing spamming. I don't see any decrease in spam but simply more effective countermeasures. We are currently experiencing a peaceful period in spam because of the strong actions taken by many people including the extraordinary efforts by Billinghurst, Trijnstel, INC, Beetstra, etc. Above all the aggressive spam-pit blocking campaign, the deep inspections on loginwiki, the reactive management of the abusefilter and the solid use of blacklists and COI-bots gave us the incredible results of managing 850 wikis with few then a dozen of incredible volunteers. I don't think any paid webmaster ever made such a complete success on so many *open* wikis. --Vituzzu (talk) 00:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Holder (talk) 06:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove - blocking for Blockcount - no thanks. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:12, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Gamma127 (talk) 15:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Rillke (talk) 11:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -jkb- 20:33, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepDoRD talk 14:56, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 01:54, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:13, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -FASTILY 09:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Activitity levels are a bit low— oh wait, those were thousands. Jafeluv (talk) 13:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
    Seconded. Keep Keep. — Ivan Shmakov (dc) 10:58, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - No problem.--KhabarNegar 12:03, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Hoo man (talk) 13:03, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


Bsadowski1Edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: en
  • Personal info: Since my last confirmation (2013), I've been very active in dealing with spambot accounts and crosswiki vandalism/abuse. I hope to continue working with my fellow stewards (and new stewards) and also focus on more tasks (such as right changes, etc). --Bsadowski1 (talk) 02:41, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments about Bsadowski1Edit


DerHexerEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1
  • Personal info: Dear readers,

    I'm one of the longest continuously serving stewards as I was elected back in December 2007. With my broad experience in handling steward actions, I'm not only dealing with almost all kinds of them (mostly via IRC) but also advise new stewards and help as a contact person between stewards, communities and developers. For that purpose, I created help pages and reports for the announced Single User Login finalisation in English and German, held a presentation about global administration at the German AdminConvention and about global administration and tools at Wikimania 2013 (last part by Hoo man; slides, video), had meetups with developers and functionaries involved, created a roadmap for that purpose etc. Looking back at my last year's confirmation page, I'm a bit disappointed in the progress of the SUL finalisation on the part of the Wikimedia Foundation but I'm confident that it will happen this year and I want to pull my weight.

    Last year, my lower activity depended on my master thesis and participation in the Board of Wikimedia Germany. As the latter (besides others) frustrated me a bit, I decided to take a break in September and came back much more actively. Further, my Board term expired and I didn't step up again; additionally, I'll finish my master next month. In the last weeks, I occupied myself with CheckUser activities mostly on loginwiki (in what I was not as experienced as in Oversight rights that I hold on metawiki and which were one my main steward activities) and closed a difficult crosswiki CheckUser case in collaboration with German, French and English CheckUsers. Besides, a couple of German administrators requested a removal of their sysop rights on my user talk page and I granted this request according to our policy which caused a couple of uncontroversial steward actions on one of my homewikis.

    Recently, I became a member of the steward election committee again (a job I did in the last couple of years too) and thus hope to approve some new fellows elected by the global community. I'd be happy to serve the community and my venerable fellows with my experience for the next term. Thank you!

Comments about DerHexerEdit

  • Keep Keep DerHexer's extensive experience as a steward is very much needed on the team, he has provided historical insight on past practices and their evolution over time many times in the past and is active and very competent. Snowolf How can I help? 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep No concerns. Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:22, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Alan (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep DerHexer Der Amazing John F. Lewis (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Érico Wouters msg 18:46, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep JurgenNL (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Remove Remove this is unaccaptable for a steward. JurgenNL (talk) 06:34, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
      • Just read through it with Google Translate and didn't see any problems. Each candidate was presented neutrally, and then with some pros and cons, and there were no personal attacks. What about this made you change from keep to remove, exactly? Is it the idea, or the actual text (which does not seem to be attacking anyone)? Is your decision based in policy or your own opinion? PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:40, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
        • To me that doesn't seem any different from giving a detailed rational when voting, and is often done by people in large elections. I prefer to give my rational on the voting page (or not at all when there's a closed ballot), but I'm not sure how this is so different. Ajraddatz (Talk) 16:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. LlamaAl (talk) 18:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 18:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, sure. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. -Mh7kJ (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Rschen7754 18:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep WOW, almost 1K(845) action on January.--Ald™ (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Stryn (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove I don't trust him. --►Cekli829 20:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    May I ask why? PiRSquared17 (talk) 20:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    Unexpected error is doing. For example, the following: [1] note that voting has not yet begun. --►Cekli829 20:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    Uhm that would even deserve a keelhauling :D --Vituzzu (talk) 20:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    One Member Election Committee should not make such mistakes. --►Cekli829 20:48, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    I agree: the eagerness to vote "Oppose", and his offensive "You're kidding us, aren't you?" comment, is both shocking and disappointing coming from a steward (not to mention a member of the Election Committee). ~ DanielTom (talk) 16:22, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
    I agree: Barras has done that offensive comment before, the "You're kidding" comment, which sickens me, but does not that much. I feel DerHexer has covered that comment. --Goldenburg111 17:22, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
    Apologies for once having lost my countenance when I saw this unpromising candidacy for the fifth time. Even though it's the truth, I should not have told it so rudely. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
    How can a sarcastic question be "the truth"? Vogone talk 16:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
    There was no sarcasm albeit impoliteness: It was as clear as mud that he would fail again, for the fifth time, as he still disrespects the community's unambiguous decision of the past years. I adhere to this view but regret my behaviour in edits and wording as this cannot change anything either. Which is why I am going to propose a limitation of candidacies. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:00, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
    All the issues which were brought up in the past were fixable and 1 year isn't that little time to do so. Thus, I don't understand why one needs to oppose without even awaiting the candidate's questions to possible answers etc. to see whether those issues have been fixed but rather to react in a bugged and impolite way. Whether a candidate has changed towards a good direction is something which should be evaluated by the community and not by eligibility limitations, in my opinion. And I clearly don't believe Cekli829 is trying to kid us but rather has some problems to understand the concerns raised and I don't think you have the right to constitute your assumption to be "the truth". Vogone talk 18:10, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
    I disagree with your view on his candidacies (and by renominating right after the last election he obviously has not fixed one issues which was raised the years before which I critized in a very rude, very impolite way on the wrong place, at the wrong time, in the wrong position) and kindly ask you for accepting my opinion. Besides, this is not the place to discuss limitations or Cekli's candidacy but my work in the past year and whether you trust me for another year. I can see my stupid mistake and regret my misbehaviour. Best regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 18:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 20:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep — TBloemink talk 20:55, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Obviously just symbolical Keep Keep... ;-) — Danny B. 21:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I do trust him Natuur12 (talk) 22:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Remove Remove I'm sorry but this is a huge nono. Natuur12 (talk) 22:46, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Southparkfan 23:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Face-smile.svg --Kolega2357 (talk) 23:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep of course--DangSunM (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Avi (talk) 01:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep MBisanz talk 03:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Glaisher [talk] 04:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I always admired his work as a steward and looked up to him as a role model. Good luck. --Meno25 (talk) 06:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep This, that and the other (talk) 06:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Wiki13 talk 10:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Neutral Neutral Because of this I don't want to support you anymore for now. I don't want to vote vote for remove either, so this is between both. --Wiki13 talk 12:30, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - In my capacity as an individual and not as a representative of the WMF. --Philippe (talk) 10:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep up the good work! Laaknor (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Mediatus (talk) 14:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Pundit (talk) 16:07, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep na gerade so ;) IW 16:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep everyone makes mistakes, DerHexer fixed his within 10 minutes. I wish everyone, including me, could be so swift. --Abd (talk) 17:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Goldenburg111 18:30, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Remove Remove I don't think a user who types about other users in a public wiki is an acceptable candidates, per User:Natuur12 --Goldenburg111 22:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Ironically, everyone commenting here is typing about other users in a public wiki. ;) Can you please explain why this is any different from just leaving a reason when supporting/opposing? Let me clarify: I respect your opinions. but don't see why this is a reason to oppose. PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:46, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Risker (talk) 02:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Zerabat (talk) 02:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep – I've only interacted with this user once or twice, but he seems like a great steward. TCN7JM 03:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I don't trust him, but whatever. Nixón (wop!) 04:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep레비Revi 06:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Wim b / [ t ] 11:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Höstblomma (talk) 12:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:06, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep hopefully he's recalled that he shall be active. --Base (talk) 12:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
    When I've been inactive? —DerHexer (Talk) 12:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Stadtbaumeister24 (talk) 14:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Unterstrichmoepunterstrich (talk) 15:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Guycn2 (talk) 17:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, definitely. AGK [•] 18:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Kmw2700 (talk) 19:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Igorwindsor (talk) 19:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 21:06, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I still love you ;-) -- Quentinv57 (talk) 22:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Krib (talk) 22:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Pratyya (Hello!) 05:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep of course, no reason to vote otherwise Trijnsteltalk 18:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Armbrust (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, of course! It's an honor and a pleasure working with you as a steward. Also per Snowolf. Mathonius (talk) 11:55, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, all gut. Elfix 18:14, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Defender (talk) 21:01, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepTeles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:01, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:18, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Theo10011 (talk) 13:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep+  @xqt 10:13, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep I love you all~~ Bennylin 13:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Bene* (talk) 19:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Aschmidt (talk) 21:02, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Wnme (talk) 21:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Stepro (talk) 22:17, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Enzian44 (talk) 22:29, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep per Cekli. --Nemo 22:36, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Chricho (talk) 01:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep, but in respect of Cekli829 reproach, I hope you will be a bit more neutral in discussions. --Midnight Gambler (talk) 09:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Good work, no complaints. Mach weiter so! :-) --Troubled @sset   Work    Talk    Mail   10:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepArkanosis 11:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Nolispanmo (talk) 12:04, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Courcelles 14:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 16:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • rock in the storm still, as every year. --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 17:32, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Geolina163 (talk) 20:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Emergency doc (talk) 22:44, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Holder (talk) 06:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- there`s no cause (OK, his mother would maybe say something other ;)) that speaks against him. One of the less Wikimedians, I really would call "friend". And that also because of his work and activity here. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:16, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- trusted. Stefan64 (talk) 16:54, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Pankoken (talk) 18:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Na, klar! --Gamma127 (talk) 14:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep When reading this, it is obvious to me that he expresses his personal opinion. I do not always share it but that's no reason to remove the steward flag as requested by some users above. DerHexer did and will hopefully continue doing indispensable work in the WMF wiki farm. Thank you. -- Rillke (talk) 11:26, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -jkb- 20:34, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep KeepDoRD talk 14:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --denny (talk) 17:42, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Bubo 08:54, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Flugs (talk) 20:17, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep Legoktm (talk) 07:14, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -FASTILY 09:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep -- Zyephyrus (talk) 10:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep. Active, helpful and devilishly handsome. Jafeluv (talk) 13:05, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --PerfektesChaos (talk) 20:01, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep - Hoo man (talk) 13:09, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Shisha-Tom 16:28, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


ElfixEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<2014 (translate this) not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: fr, en-3
  • Personal info: Hello! I would like to continue to serve as a steward. I was elected back in 2012. Most of the steward operations I have carried out here for the past two years were upon my own initiative or upon IRC requests. I do not plan to change my approach towards the steward tools, if the community is willing to support my confirmation. Elfix 17:32, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments about ElfixEdit