Stewards/Confirm/2013/it

The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Italiano:

La votazione di riconferma 2013–14 avrà inizio il 8 febbraio e terminerà il 27 febbraio.

Le elezioni 2013–14 per i nuovi steward rappresentano una buona opportunità per verificare il livello di soddisfazione esistente nei confronti degli attuali steward. Al fine di rendere agevole la procedura, sono riportate qui le modalità di svolgimento.

Per comentare, effettua l'accesso con un account che abbia effettuato modifiche (su qualsiasi wiki) precedentemente al 1º febbraio 2013. Durante le elezioni del 2013, indica gli eventuali motivi di soddisfazione o scontento rispetto l'uso delle funzioni di steward da parte dell'utente indicato. Per esempio, potresti riferirti all'inattività. Gli steward inattivi, come stabilito nelle policy di riferimento, perderanno il proprio status.

Al termine delle elezioni, gli steward attuali e i nuovi eletti esamineranno le segnalazioni contenute su questa pagina e sceglieranno se rimuovere i diritti di steward, sia tenendo conto dei commenti lasciati dalla comunità, sia delle prospettive e dell'interpretazione del proprio compito da parte di ciascuno. Tutti gli steward eletti prima del febbraio 2012 ripeteranno questo iter di riconferma al termine di ciascuna elezione. La conferma per gli steward eletti nel'ottobre 2012 è opzionale in questo caso poiché non hanno ancora ricoperto tale ruolo per un intero anno. Saranno soggetti a una regola econferma obbligatoria durante l'elezione del 2014.

Vedi anche:

Purge the cache of this page?

Andre Engels

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: en
Personal info: My apologies for not making a statement earlier. I have indeed been mostly inactive as a Steward, except for doing some deletion that I came across in small wikis. I'd prefer to keep the status in case I find some time & job to do as a Steward in a few months time, but as there are no specific plans at this time I have full understanding if I get removed for inactivity now.

Comments about Andre Engels

Remove --Vogone (talk) 00:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Andre has been inactive as a steward pretty much since last reconfirmation ( 13 edits on meta, 3 steward actions). Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 00:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I see Andre has now made a statement. I suggest that perhaps, if he's still interested in doing deletion on small wikis, he should consider, in the event that he doesn't get reconfirmed, applying for a global sysop flag. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 00:15, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove solely due to inactivity. --Rs chen 7754 00:57, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactive. Thanks for your work. Érico Wouters ^msg 01:20, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove due to inactivity. --Make cat 03:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove White Master (e s) 06:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactive steward--Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You were desysopped on Commons in March 2008. After this you have on several occasions used your steward rights to delete pages on Commons outside of your remit as a steward. Please understand that having global rights is not a license for acting as a local admin in a wiki where you no longer hold the tools. As a separate note and per above, I would suggest removal due to inactivity. Jafeluv (talk) 09:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- He also never had local sysop rights on de.WP, but locally blocked a user last year who was only active on de.WP and who was just two minutes ago being "announced" because of vandalism on the local VM twice, there wasn't any need for a steward to act. There are hundreds of local sysops who can do blocks there, especially at that time, a sysop would have done the same one or two minutes later, so I don't understand that at all. I would appreciate an explanation for that also. --– Geitost ^diskusjon 00:09, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactive. Thanks for the work you've done as a steward ! -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 09:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - in the light of low activity and reluctance to make a statement, I'd rather remove the rights. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - too inactive for my taste. -Barras talk 13:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactive, sorry--Steinsplitter (talk) 15:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per inactivity. -Mh7kJ (talk) 16:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Travelour Talk E - Mail 17:55, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove: Personally I think any steward who fails to create a statement should be disqualified at this point, but there we go. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A very sad Remove as I really appreciate you and your help, but you were too inactive last year & didn't even create this 'statement'. Trijnstel_talk 22:20, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:14, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Waka Waka (talk) 00:11, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --cyrfaw (talk) 04:38, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Although it's not nice not to see the statement, Andre is formally active enough; thus inactivity is not a valid reason for stewardship removal. And I hope that he'll become more active. --Millosh (talk) 13:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No statement doesn't look very convincing even if he has the required log actions. Do you want to continue helping here? It would be appreciated. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:08, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep now that there's a statement & per Nemo and Ruslik0. I've thought about this and while you've been inactive compared to other users I'd not like to loose the good work you usually do and the background and good advice you provide. I think however we all would be happy if you could increase your activity. Best regards. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 23:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Sorry but your too inactive to keep steward tools. Techman224^Talk 20:57, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per inactivity.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{@ L C S}˲» 19:59, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Millosh and the fact that he now have the statement written. ✒ Bennylin 15:54, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Barely active, but Active enough per policy. --Jyothis (talk) 19:16, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it's up to you to state if you can be helpful as a stewie. --Vituzzu (talk) 23:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Fəaliyyətini qənaətbəxş hesab edirəm. Qaydaları kifayət qədər normal səviyyədə bilir. Zərərsiz olduğu üçün ona etimad göstərirəm. --►Safir yüzüklü Cekli^mesaj 04:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 08:14, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep has been around, more activity more useful — billinghurst sDrewth 13:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactive stewards don't need to keep their flags. Ajraddatz (Talk) 17:29, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep One of the original stewards (only other current steward who was in the first "group" is Mav), therefore one of the most experienced. Besides, he'll be useful. πr² (t • c) 17:40, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Inactive, but other than that, I don't see any reason to remove. Hurricanefan24 (talk) 17:57, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'd tend to keep given the experience and track of activity as steward and that I'd miss him: decrease of recent activity would not be a good reason alone IMHO, and even just his recent activity is comparable to the activity of other stewards who are passing. However, small activity is an issue if we can't assess his job, and while I trust him I'd like to see a response to Jafeluv above. --Nemo 06:15, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactive --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:44, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactive stewards don't need the tools. Russavia (talk) 16:49, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Still chance to be more active.--Jusjih (talk) 13:07, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Inactive but I still do not want to lose the longest serving steward. Ruslik (talk) 07:13, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactive -FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:56, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep trusted. MoiraMoira (talk) 20:28, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Avraham

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: en, he-2
Personal info: I remain very happy to see that requests in general, and checkuser issues on which I tend to focus in particular, have been answered in a reasonable amount of time by stewards. I would like to continue to support the family of Wikimedia projects as a steward in the coming year. Thank you very much for both your past trust and present consideration. -- Avi (talk) 23:46, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Avraham

I love you! :-D —DerHexer (Talk) 00:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 00:59, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no problem--Ymblanter (talk) 09:01, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no problems here. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. ✒ Bennylin 10:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 10:49, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm - I see no problems here. -Barras talk 13:29, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 13:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no problem--Steinsplitter (talk) 15:13, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -Mh7kJ (talk) 16:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jyothis (talk) 17:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:01, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep every steward I've collaborated with this year. Elfix 18:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jon Harald Søby (talk) 22:05, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trijnstel_talk 22:20, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 22:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Alanscottwalker (talk) 20:38, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 02:53, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:15, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 15:53, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 15:55, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 17:08, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Alanscottwalker (talk) 20:38, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Itzuvit (talk) 23:27, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Morning Sunshine (talk) 12:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Millosh (talk) 13:49, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:11, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Techman224^Talk 21:10, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no issues here. Jafeluv (talk) 18:34, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No problems here. Very helpful user.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{@ L C S}˲» 20:05, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Philippe (talk) 03:48, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 23:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --►Safir yüzüklü Cekli^mesaj 04:52, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Torreslfchero (talk) 07:32, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Technically an oppose Avraham is certainly qualified to retain the role, however when I look at the list of users that are, at the current time, being unanimously reconfirmed, I don't really think that he's at that level. Good? Yes. Unanimous? No. Congrats on the reconfirmation though! I don't fully expect everyone to understand (or respect) my decision here, but since this isn't going to have any meaningful impact on the results, and because I try and stay the hell away from Meta and it's penchant for explosive dysfunction as much as possible, I won't be answering any inquiries about this. Avi got me to respond by asking me on Wikipedia instead of here. Since I did respond, I might as well link to it here. Sven Manguard (talk) 23:32, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 08:16, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep challenges points of view, valuable — billinghurst sDrewth 13:11, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
--Jan eissfeldt (talk) 18:46, 14 February 2013 (UTC) always helpful[reply]
Keep Hurricanefan24 (talk) 17:58, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — ΛΧΣ²¹ 17:51, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Christianrueger (talk) 20:16, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 13:08, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep es:Magister Mathematicae 17:08, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ruslik (talk) 06:59, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 17:20, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:45, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure, no problems. πr² (t • c) 18:09, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. LeinaD (t) 21:35, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Axpde

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: de, en
Personal info: For health reasons I wasn't able to hold my office. I stayed at hospital for more than half a year and therefore wasn't online most of the time. Last week I started my occupational rehabilitation - and beyond that to care more about wikipedia/wikimedia again. Alone, I'll need my time, to rediscover my old constitution. I understand the displeasure about my absence, but I ask for mercy and some more time to give proof of my usefulness. Greetings

Comments about Axpde

Remove --Vogone (talk) 00:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove He became inactive as soon as he got the steward status (see his logged actions on meta). I haven't see him for months, shame that he didn't even said goodbye... -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 00:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. While I am aware that Axpde has had a difficult year, and I don't envy him one bit, he is for all intents are purposes inactive, and the whole idea behind reconfirmation is to evaluate year by year whether continued access to the steward toolset makes sense, and I do not believe it does at this time. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 00:29, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove solely due to inactivity. --Rs chen 7754 00:59, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Inactive. Thanks for your work. Érico Wouters ^msg 01:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC) Keep Looks you are back now and so changing my comment to "keep". Érico Wouters ^msg 17:49, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove only because of inactivity. --Make cat 03:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove White Master (e s) 06:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This was unimpressive coming from a steward, and would have been an abuse of tools had you acted on it. However, it's been quite a while since that comment and by itself it's nothing to oppose over. In any case I'm going to support removal due to inactivity. Jafeluv (talk) 09:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, due to inactivity and lack of statement (=lost touch with the community?) I am aware, though, that willingness to come back would be most welcome. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - sorry, but no longer really active. -Barras talk 13:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, too inactive. -Mh7kJ (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, never active. Ajraddatz (Talk) 16:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
To expand on my reasoning a bit, Axpde has never been active as a steward, and not really as a global sysop either[1]. Axpde's few actions in the last couple of days are more than (s)he has ever done before. In my mind, applying for stewardship and then only using the rights around the time of a confirmation is an abuse of the trust placed in him by the community. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:18, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, per Jafeluv and Ajraddatz. I am surprised that, even though active on his home-wiki, he is unable (or unwilling) to perform a single log action or give a reason for his absence here on meta. Sa vh ^ñ 17:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, I had no idea he was active on dewiki. I thought he had been inactive because of health reasons as stated on his meta page. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 17:42, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Re-enforcing my comment, in full agreeance with Ajraddatz. Axpde performed, in the 1 year and 4 months he has been steward, no global locks & blocks up to today and a very limited amount of rights changes, a majority of which on test-wikis. There are also quite a few actions/opinions taken by Axpde with which I disagree, adittionally to the diff provided by Jafeluv, such as redirecting your talkpage to your main userpage cross-wiki, thus making communicating with you more complicated for non-English speakers, test-wiki hat-collecting, inmature reactions, abuse of rollback, considering stewards the only trusted users, uncivil reactions and inconsistent actions regarding his own global rights. (These are just a few examples I found looking through his talkpage) The user has also not either yet explained why the inactivity did not affect his homewikis. Sa vh ^ñ 16:16, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Remove: Personally I think any steward who fails to create a confirmation statement should be disqualified by this point. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Didn't do much since being elected in the end of 2011. Per Jafeluv, Ajraddatz and Savh. Trijnstel_talk 22:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:16, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --cyrfaw (talk) 10:48, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral As with André. No statement does not look very convincing. However the user says he's away for health reasons and I know how that can be utterly annoying. Would you like to continue helping here? -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:14, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per recent events such as this wrong removal of rights IMHO. Not suggesting that the requesting user was lying but removal requests without community discussion should be placed by the requesting user. The links given in the request does not mention explicitly a request for rights removal (just a retirement). I'd not have performed that without user confirmation (even the link provided in this diff is private but even if it were public, valid requests should go to SRP). I mean, there's no way to confirm the truly validity of the request. Also there's a record of you performing actions without consensus such as (this recent one) that concerns me. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 23:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Sorry but your too inactive. Techman224^Talk 21:17, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per inactivity.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{@ L C S}˲» 06:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC) Keep. Looks like you are back now and as that issue with protecting your own user talk page is past, I can see no reasons to remove.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{@ L C S}˲» 02:47, 16 February 2013 (UTC) Neutral. Not sure.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{@ L C S}˲» 05:29, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Inactivity due to force majeur. Activity on home-wiki is different matter, as some people prefer the comfort of their mother tongue. Plus, now he has written his statement and still have the willingness. Like a wise Wikimedian once told me, an inactive admin/steward is still better than an active admin/steward who abuse the tool. ✒ Bennylin 16:01, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with the request to resign if you'll have no time to go on being a steward. --Vituzzu (talk) 23:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Qalsın. --►Safir yüzüklü Cekli^mesaj 04:56, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Was inactive due to health reasons. --Millosh (talk) 09:42, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above --Iste (D) 10:37, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. -Zyephyrus (talk) 08:18, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep more activity, would be good; that said personal health comes first, and way above being a steward (per Vituzzu) — billinghurst sDrewth 13:14, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. --Wnme (talk) 17:40, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there is a thing known as real life, which can hinder a lot of stuff :| Hurricanefan24 (talk) 17:59, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per Snowolf and Jafeluv: quite a tendency to the "I have the powers and I'll use them just for the sake of it", IMHO. --Nemo 05:49, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:45, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Still chance to be more active.--Jusjih (talk) 13:12, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove I am afraid but the recent spurt of activity is likely to die out after the election. I think you should take time out of the stewards duties and return when you are really ready. Ruslik (talk) 19:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Very active. --N KOzi^Talk 19:33, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pro, agreeing with Bennylin. Ich stimme mit Bennylin überein. However, I hope you're able to do a few more actions this year. πr² (t • c) 18:14, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barras

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

italiano:

Lingue: de, en-4
Informazioni personali: Questa è la mia seconda riconferma, poichè sono stato eletto solamente nel 2011. Sono stato abbastanza attivo in quest'anno di servizio. Ho usato gli strumenti da steward per vari scopi, facendo cancellazioni e blocchi a livello cross-wiki per esempio (vedi le statistiche). Mi sono occupato anche di vandalismi e spam, bloccando molti utenti e IP. Ho fatto anche molte modifiche ai diritti, principalmente al mio account per prevenire abusi e rimuovere cose offensive, ma ho cambiato molto anche i privilegi di altri utenti. Di solito aiuto un pò ovunque, dove l'aiuto è necessario, su IRC e anche qui su Wiki. Se hai domande, chiedi pure.

Comments about Barras

Keep Thehelpfulone 00:01, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ignacio (talk) 00:05, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I love you! :-D —DerHexer (Talk) 00:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Of course ! :) -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 00:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Iste (D) 00:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Absolutely :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 00:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 01:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 01:05, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Why not? White Master (e s) 06:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 10:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the good steward. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep mi cki 10:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. ✒ Bennylin 10:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 10:50, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 11:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bsadowski1 (talk) 12:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 12:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 13:47, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, most certainly. -Mh7kJ (talk) 16:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jyothis (talk) 17:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. Of course, very active and helpful steward. Sa vh ^ñ 17:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well... tricky one. Just this once, then, I guess we'll Keep him. I suppose. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep every steward I've collaborated with this year. Elfix 18:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :-) Jon Harald Søby (talk) 22:05, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trijnstel_talk 22:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 22:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Osiris (talk) 02:21, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Theo10011 (talk) 02:48, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 02:53, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :D Sotiale (talk) 03:09, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:16, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 17:08, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Tegel _(Talk) 17:48, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Alanscottwalker (talk) 20:40, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Solid steward work.--Vito Genovese 21:54, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:48, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 13:32, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Millosh (talk) 13:57, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:16, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 17:31, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Techman224^Talk 21:20, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Very active and always helpful. But "only in 2011"? That's like a lifetime in wiki time. Jafeluv (talk) 18:37, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In my capacity as a volunteer. --Philippe (talk) 03:49, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{@ L C S}˲» 06:34, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 23:31, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yet again keep. --►Safir yüzüklü Cekli^mesaj 04:57, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Torreslfchero (talk) 07:33, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very active, always helpful QuiteUnusual ^TalkQu 09:01, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Relie86 (talk) 10:12, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --.sEdivad (msg) 13:57, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 08:18, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wnme (talk) 08:54, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep bonza — billinghurst sDrewth 13:20, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Useless, pile-on Keep per overall actions as a steward. Ajraddatz (Talk) 17:36, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
--Jan eissfeldt (talk) 18:47, 14 February 2013 (UTC) sure :)[reply]
Keep Hurricanefan24 (talk) 18:00, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep John F. Lewis (talk) 18:03, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --ThiagoRuiz ^talk 18:37, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hazard-SJ ✈ 23:54, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No reason for removal of rights, good work done. --Niklas 555 (talk) 12:50, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 13:15, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jawohl, Herr Steward! Er ist ein guter Steward! πr² (t • c) 00:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ruslik (talk) 07:07, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Emergency doc (talk) 12:55, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 17:05, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - --Peterdownunder (talk) 11:01, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:57, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I am playing swtor and greatest sith lord of the empire quest is called Darth Barras. I am afraid that in order to finish the game, I have to support him here as well. Petrb (talk) 22:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 12:55, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 20:29, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. :) LeinaD (t) 21:35, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
behalten is needed very much, that's for sure, does a good work, macht gute Arbeit, weiter so! --– Geitost ^diskusjon 23:03, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bencmq

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

italiano:

Lingue: zh, en-3
Informazioni personali: Ciao, sono diventato uno steward durante la seconda fase di elezione nel 2011 e questa è la mia prima riconferma. La mia attività come steward non è tra le più alte, ma, per quanto mi riguarda, sono contento comunque del mio livello di attività. Le mie aree di attenzioni erano principalmente rispondere alle richieste in IRC e occuparmi del cross-wiki vandalismo, seguito da i lavori in SRP e in SRCU. Mi piacerebbe avere il tuo supporto per servire come steward per un altro anno. Fammi sapere i tuoi commenti e opinion in modo tale da migliorare il mio lavoro per il futuro. Grazie per le tue considerazioni. --Bencmq (talk) 02:49, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Bencmq

Keep Thehelpfulone 00:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ignacio (talk) 00:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vogone (talk) 00:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I love you! :-D —DerHexer (Talk) 00:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
<3 -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 00:25, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 00:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Iste (D) 00:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 01:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Érico Wouters ^msg 01:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Make cat 03:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep White Master (e s) 06:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good impression from interaction--Ymblanter (talk) 09:01, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, loads of good feeling about this steward. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep mi cki 10:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. ✒ Bennylin 10:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 10:51, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 11:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Cornfirm - I see no problems here, a good steward fellow! -Barras talk 13:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :-)--Steinsplitter (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jyothis (talk) 17:38, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Yes, please. Sa vh ^ñ 17:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep every steward I've collaborated with this year. Elfix 18:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 21:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jon Harald Søby (talk) 22:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trijnstel_talk 22:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 22:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 02:53, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :D Sotiale (talk) 03:09, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:17, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 15:58, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 17:09, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Tegel _(Talk) 17:48, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:48, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Morning Sunshine (talk) 12:46, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 13:33, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Millosh (talk) 13:57, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:17, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Techman224^Talk 21:21, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no issues here. Jafeluv (talk) 18:39, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Of course!—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{@ L C S}˲» 06:43, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 23:31, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Etibar etmək istəyirəm. Amma mənimlə bağlı səsvermədə dediyi "obvious trolling" sözünə aydınlıq gətirməsini istərdim. --►Safir yüzüklü Cekli^mesaj 05:01, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 08:19, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep valuable insights, and valuable language skills — billinghurst sDrewth 13:23, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pile-on Keep, has been useful this last year :) Ajraddatz (Talk) 17:37, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hurricanefan24 (talk) 18:00, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Russavia (talk) 16:52, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He is one of best user in ZH Wikipedia!—An Macanese 21:22, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 13:16, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ruslik (talk) 06:58, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 17:20, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
KeepGood Job.--Yhz1221 (talk) 06:50, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Wangxuan8331800 (talk) 04:42, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 当然了！πr² (t • c) 18:17, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bennylin

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: id, en, jv, zh
Personal info: I'm happy to be able to help as steward, and hope that I could be given another year to serve as steward. While a change in job schedule has left me unable to patrol in the timezone where most of the stewards asleep, like I promised in my election page, I still able to help mitigating crosswiki abuse and stand-by on IRC channel several hours every weekday. Lastly, I would like to thank the community that have been very helpful to the stewards via IRC. Salam.

Comments about Bennylin

I love you! :-D —DerHexer (Talk) 00:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 00:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep mi cki 10:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 10:51, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm - I see no problems here. Good steward! -Barras talk 13:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jyothis (talk) 17:38, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 21:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jon Harald Søby (talk) 22:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trijnstel_talk 22:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 22:29, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :D Sotiale (talk) 03:09, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:18, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 15:53, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 15:59, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 17:10, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Tegel _(Talk) 17:48, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:48, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 13:33, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Millosh (talk) 13:58, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Techman224^Talk 21:22, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, solid net positive. Jafeluv (talk) 18:40, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{@ L C S}˲» 06:43, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 23:30, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Fəaliyyətini qənaətbəxş hesab edirəm. --►Safir yüzüklü Cekli^mesaj 05:02, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 08:20, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep important language skills, and timezone coverage — billinghurst sDrewth 13:26, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the unique insight you give for each of your votes! :) Mine was plain old four-tildes. ✒ Bennylin
Keep, has done good work as a steward this past year. Ajraddatz (Talk) 17:37, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hurricanefan24 (talk) 18:00, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep John F. Lewis (talk) 18:07, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - orang pintar - harus masih kerja disini - (translated) clever person, must stay working hard here sats (talk) 11:16, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bsadowski1 (talk) 11:17, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 13:17, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ruslik (talk) 19:25, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 17:40, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 20:53, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep without a doubt. πr² (t • c) 21:31, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. LeinaD (t) 21:38, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Billinghurst

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: en
Personal info: I plan to continue in the role of steward, if the community is willing to confirm me. I have pretty much undertaken the tasks I said that I would when I was elected last year. My mop has been active and consistent in areas of strength, and I have undertaken some activities in other areas as required. Stewards have worked cooperatively and respectfully; as a team sharing the work, sharing advice and requesting assistance as necessary, it has been a harmonious and pleasant group with whom to work, and I commend them for their passion, diligence and efforts. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:34, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Billinghurst

Keep Thehelpfulone 00:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ignacio (talk) 00:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I love you! :-D —DerHexer (Talk) 00:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vogone (talk) 00:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep your dedication to the job and activity on this year are incredible. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 00:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Same words as DerHexer just above : I love you and I love what you do ! :-) -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 00:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Iste (D) 00:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 01:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 01:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Érico Wouters ^msg 01:25, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Make cat 03:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 10:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep mi cki 10:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. ✒ Bennylin 10:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 10:52, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 11:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 11:48, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I agree with the other stewards above me. I really like your dedication to the fight against the spambots. --Bsadowski1 (talk) 12:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm - What would we do without you? You really do a lot here! Thanks for your work. -Barras talk 13:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. One of the easiest votes I've made in a long time. -Mh7kJ (talk) 16:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Certainly. --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 16:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jyothis (talk) 17:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. Thanks for your great work. Sa vh ^ñ 17:43, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep g'day. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep every steward I've collaborated with this year. Elfix 18:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jon Harald Søby (talk) 22:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Barras ... in the past year you've become almost irreplaceable. Trijnstel_talk 22:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Meno25 (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Osiris (talk) 02:22, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 02:53, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :D Sotiale (talk) 03:09, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:19, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, impressively active. -- Menti fisto 16:06, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep kudos Pundit (talk) 17:10, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Tegel _(Talk) 17:48, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Alanscottwalker (talk) 20:42, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 13:34, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Millosh (talk) 13:58, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:21, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 17:32, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Techman224^Talk 21:23, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Helpful steward, very active on the CU arena. Jafeluv (talk) 18:44, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In my capacity as a volunteer. --Philippe (talk) 03:50, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. His numbers are ridiculously higher in comparison with others. His knowledge is impressive too.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{@ L C S}˲» 06:45, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Impressive contribution. What about some more prowess in languages? :D εΔ ω 09:20, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
hmm, I think that response is somewhere between ... I speak spambot and IP ... ^&^&#$#%#%!!! ... :-p — billinghurst sDrewth 13:28, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 23:30, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Fəaliyyətini qənaətbəxş hesab edirəm. --►Safir yüzüklü Cekli^mesaj 05:02, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The place would fall apart without you QuiteUnusual ^TalkQu 09:02, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :) --Zyephyrus (talk) 08:22, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lots of work in an area of steward work where we need the most volunteers. Ajraddatz (Talk) 17:38, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hurricanefan24 (talk) 18:00, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - sats (talk) 11:19, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 13:18, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ruslik (talk) 07:05, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The level of work has been appreciated --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:34, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 17:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Peterdownunder (talk) 10:59, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Beeblebrox (talk) 18:34, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:57, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Most active steward (actions per day), especially focusing on anti-spam matters. Good on ya, mate. πr² (t • c) 18:00, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 20:30, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. LeinaD (t) 21:36, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bsadowski1

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

italiano:

Lingue: en
Informazioni personali: Questa è la mia seconda riconferma come steward. Fui eletto in febbraio 2011, e, da allora, sono stato attivo. Sono stato attivo come steward cancellando lo spam a livello crosswiki e facendo attenzione agli spambot. Sono ansioso per un altro (nuovo) anno di steward. --Bsadowski1 (talk) 23:51, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments about Bsadowski1

Keep Thehelpfulone 00:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ignacio (talk) 00:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I love you! :-D —DerHexer (Talk) 00:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of course, very hard working steward :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 00:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sure ! Thanks for the work you do ! :-) -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 00:29, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 01:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 01:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Make cat 03:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 10:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the guy is notoriously faster than my poor self. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep mi cki 10:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 10:52, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 11:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 12:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm - Absolutely no problems here! -Barras talk 13:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 14:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jyothis (talk) 17:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep useful, despite being American. (Whoops, did I say that out loud?) PeterSymonds (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep every steward I've collaborated with this year. Elfix 18:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jon Harald Søby (talk) 22:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trijnstel_talk 22:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Osiris (talk) 02:22, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 02:53, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :D Sotiale (talk) 03:09, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:20, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep you set the bar impressively high and are an inspiration to us all. Pundit (talk) 17:11, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:49, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Morning Sunshine (talk) 12:53, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 13:34, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Millosh (talk) 13:59, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sven Manguard (talk) 19:52, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Techman224^Talk 21:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Active and useful as always. Jafeluv (talk) 18:45, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In my capacity as a volunteer. --Philippe (talk) 03:50, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 23:30, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Fəaliyyətini qənaətbəxş hesab edirəm. --►Safir yüzüklü Cekli^mesaj 05:03, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 08:22, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep special skills ... vandal-tag — billinghurst sDrewth 13:30, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per reasoning above. Generally good steward :P Ajraddatz (Talk) 17:38, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hurricanefan24 (talk) 18:01, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 13:19, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ruslik (talk) 06:58, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 17:20, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - One of the best!--Peterdownunder (talk) 11:14, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Good on recognizing patterns.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{@ L C S}˲» 08:04, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 20:42, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep! πr² (t • c) 23:46, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DerHexer

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1
Personal info: Unfortunately, I could not have been as active as in the last years. That's mostly due to my work at university and academy and my changed focus in the Wikiversum: I always want to learn about new parts of the Wikiversum and try to improve their structure and effectivity. Hence, I'm currently working as a member of the board of Wikimedia Deutschland.
Regarding steward work, we currently have more active users than in the last years so that my main focus changed to teaching and helping them if necessary. Thank you all for your tremendous work! Since some trolls could be prevented from disturbing our projects, the focus of most stewards switched from fighting vandals to locking spambots and blocking open proxies. Although that's useful for our projects, it doesn't give great pleasure to me. Instead, besides assisting my fellows, I helped a bit on SWMT, SRGP, and on IRC and our mailing list.
Furthermore, I co-organized the annual steward meetup at Wikimania where we planned some improvements for our work. My part was to write a script for a planned global rename policy. Due to some fixes by Hoo man, the script could have been used on secure server when this policy had been accepted (and I still hope that this will happen soon). With deactivating the secure server, the time-consuming programming was all for nothing because the script cannot be used elsewhere. But luckily, the WMF developers are currently working on a global rename tool (or hopefully at least on a rename API).
I recently became a member of the steward election committee (a job I did in the last couple of years too) and thus hope to approve some new fellows elected by the global community. I'd be happy to serve the community and my beloved fellows with my experience for the next term. Thank you!

Comments about DerHexer

Keep because I love you :-) -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 00:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thehelpfulone 00:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep hurra! per Quentinv57 ;-) Vogone (talk) 00:05, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ignacio (talk) 00:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Iste (D) 00:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep absolutely :) His insights into steward and policy history are invaluable. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 00:25, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 01:01, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 01:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep White Master (e s) 06:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:43, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm slightly concerned about your acting as a steward in your home wiki, including changing userrights with no indication on Meta except for the log entry [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], and to the point that people from dewiki are asking other stewards not to intervene if the request was made to you personally [10]. Stewards are not intended to be local superusers and IMO home wiki actions should be left to uninvolved stewards to ensure impartiality. All that said, current steward policy seems to allow this and since you do a lot of good work I support your confirmation again this year. Jafeluv (talk) 09:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The first ones have been done according to our policy that says that non-controversial returns of sysop rights can be done on homewikis. The other ones have been done to serve the community as much as possible (so no super rights for myself), mostly including import rights that have been given out by me since years (and thus is more or less a rule which could be changed of course), and confirmed status which should be non-controversial (and in these cases urgently needed) too but should be handled by local bureaucrats instead, imo. Regarding the Hozro case, other people were wondering why Müdigkeit rushed to meta (I don't know whether he supported Hozro's return of his sysop rights, I regret it) because I usually handle these self-removal requests within the next 48 hours respecting the cool-down period of 24 hours that stewards agreed on a couple of years ago. As you might remember, that reduced some dramaz in the past and did so last year too. If it's controversial or I'm too much involved, I always point users to meta. I also do that (or point them to my user talk page) with requests on IRC or per mail to maximize transparency. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:43, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the response. Wrt the confirmed flag, it might be worth considering making it an admin-assignable group like on enwiki. After all, dewiki admins can already assign much more restricted rights like editor and autochecked user. Certainly a better solution than finding a friendly steward every time someone needs the confirmed flag, although that's of course ultimately for the local community to decide. Jafeluv (talk) 11:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. I'll bring that into discussion of the community asap. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
+ 1, every sysop should be able to do that, not only bureaucrats. Is there a discussion about that yet (didn't find one)? Do we need an MB for that or just a PD with link from there, this should be uncontroversial. --– Geitost ^diskusjon 22:17, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I partly disagree: Every sysop (who wants to) needs to learn how to use importupload first. This is a powerful, and very dangerous tool (in fact, much more dangerous than all other sysop tools). More helping hands are always useful but currently the importers on dewiki are working very well (without my assistance). But there's no need that I have to teach them myself nor that I assign the rights. But the ones who do should know what this userright affects, shouldn't they? ;-) Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:03, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand. What has the importupload right to do with the confirmed right? Autoconfirmed gets every user automatically after 4 days, so where's the problem with confirmed? Why should a sysop first learn the importupload thing for being able to assign confirmed rights? Are we talking about the same? If someone may assign passive editor, editor and IP block exception rights, then confirmed rights are more uncontroversial than these three. Perhaps we should continue to discuss that on de.WP? --– Geitost ^diskusjon 00:31, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
We obviously don't. :-D I was talking about the importer user right I assigned. The confirmed status should be assigned by bureaucrats, or sysop, right. :-) —DerHexer (Talk) 01:18, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep What Quentinv57 said. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 10:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because I share his feelings towards me ;) Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep mi cki 10:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. ✒ Bennylin 10:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 10:53, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 11:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 11:46, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm - You already belong to the steward inventory, just like some stewardtools. ;-) -Barras talk 13:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wnme (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure. odder (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Love you too! --Jyothis (talk) 17:40, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. Obviously. Sa vh ^ñ 17:45, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep naturlich, ich liebe dich auch (or something). PeterSymonds (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep every steward I've collaborated with this year. Elfix 18:20, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for his loviness Jon Harald Søby (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per PeterSymonds. Verdammt, ich lieb' dich. ;) Trijnstel_talk 22:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Keep up the good work. --Meno25 (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep love-machine! Theo10011 (talk) 02:49, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I love you. MBisanz ^talk 02:54, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :D Sotiale (talk) 03:10, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:21, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sure, great user --Poco a poco (talk) 16:33, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep whole lotta of love ;) Pundit (talk) 17:11, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Tegel _(Talk) 17:49, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep-- Mar del Sur (talk) 19:45, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Heubergen (talk) 22:41, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep + Botulph (talk) 09:29, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:49, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 13:35, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Millosh (talk) 13:59, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 14:30, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:22, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 17:33, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Techman224^Talk 21:26, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In my capacity as a volunteer. --Philippe (talk) 03:51, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 06:37, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The steward. --Deskana (talk) 15:47, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Redlinux (talk) 22:54, 12 February 2013 (UTC) keep - no doubt)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 23:30, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Fəaliyyətini qənaətbəxş hesab edirəm. --►Safir yüzüklü Cekli^mesaj 05:03, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We're overwhelmed with love! - εΔ ω 13:52, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 08:24, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep gold — billinghurst sDrewth 13:39, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 14:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good work. I don't mind the instances of using rights on homewiki much - he hasn't done anything super-controversial. Ajraddatz (Talk) 17:39, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
--Jan eissfeldt (talk) 18:51, 14 February 2013 (UTC) goes without saying[reply]
Keep Hurricanefan24 (talk) 18:01, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep John F. Lewis (talk) 18:07, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Christianrueger (talk) 20:08, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Quentin57 :-) Lukas²³ (talk) 22:20, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hazard-SJ ✈ 23:45, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A very good veteran steward. --Bsadowski1 (talk) 11:15, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course. --Niklas 555 (talk) 12:47, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 13:20, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep es:Magister Mathematicae 17:08, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ruslik (talk) 19:25, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Emergency doc (talk) 12:57, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Melos (talk) 17:41, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Alan ffm (talk) 00:30, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Roy 06:11, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:01, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Schwäbin (talk) 14:54, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Enst38 (talk) 00:37, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yarl (talk) 21:14, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Wolfgang Pehlemann (talk) 13:00, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Always good to read your advice, old man.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{@ L C S}˲» 08:23, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Angrense (talk) 11:26, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Tomás66 (talk) 10:01, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP MoiraMoira (talk) 20:56, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. LeinaD (t) 21:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
unbedingt behalten, denn was würden wir sonst ohne ihn machen?What would we do without him? (can't imagine that). .oO See also Snowolf, didn't read all of the rest here. Das mit dem Inventar stimmt auch, der wird die Knöppe erst los, wenn er sie selbst irgendwann mal wegwirft (und das hoffentlich noch nicht so bald). ;-) --– Geitost ^diskusjon 22:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, natürlich. πr² (t • c) 23:32, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Elfix

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: fr, en-3
Personal info: My motivation hasn't changed since my election as a steward a year ago: I would still like to help out with cross-wiki issues. I rarely take care of on-wiki requests; most of the steward operations I have undertaken this year have been done upon my own initiative or upon requests on IRC.

As to the alleged issues about my use of the CU tools sur frwiki that were raised during my election, the Ombudsman commission has told me not having seen any evidence of breach in the privacy policy, and has given to frwiki checkusers some advice to make sure they are always in compliance with the CheckUser policy.

Comments about Elfix

Keep Thehelpfulone 00:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yes. --Ignacio (talk) 00:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I love you! :-D —DerHexer (Talk) 00:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Of course :) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 00:25, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 01:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep To be honnest, my opinion about you has changed a lot during this last year. From what I've seen, you always acted wisely as a steward, and that's what really matters. Thanks for your good work ! -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 09:49, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, very helpful. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep mi cki 10:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 10:53, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Superjuju10 (talk) 11:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm - I see no problems here. A good steward fellow. -Barras talk 13:40, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Jyothis (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep bonjour. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Rs chen 7754 21:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jon Harald Søby (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Trijnstel_talk 22:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MBisanz ^talk 02:55, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep :D Sotiale (talk) 03:10, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:21, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Theoliane (talk) 14:33, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ruslik (talk) 07:05, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Höstblomma (talk) 16:05, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pundit (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Tegel _(Talk) 17:49, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:30, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:49, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 13:36, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Millosh (talk) 13:59, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:23, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Arkanosis ^✉ 17:35, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Techman224^Talk 21:27, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no reason not to. Jafeluv (talk) 18:45, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Cantons-de-l'Est (talk) 01:46, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In my capacity as a volunteer. --Philippe (talk) 03:52, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 23:30, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Fəaliyyətini qənaətbəxş hesab edirəm. --►Safir yüzüklü Cekli^mesaj 05:04, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep observant and clear speaking — billinghurst sDrewth 13:41, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hurricanefan24 (talk) 18:01, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Laurent Jerry (talk) 16:27, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Christianrueger (talk) 20:23, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Jusjih (talk) 13:21, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]