Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2012/Votes/Elfix

< Stewards | Elections 2012 | Votes
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

Elfix (Felix M.)

edit
ContentsYes • No • Neutral

Elfix talk • contribs • SULutil (accounts) / stalktoy • globalcontribs • crosswiki-ness • confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: fr-N, en-3
  • Personal info: Hello everyone. After 4 years of activity on Wikimedia projects, I have decided to run for the current elections. I have been admin on frwiki since 2008, and OTRS volunteer since 2009.

    My more recent activity as a checkuser on frwiki (appointed in 2010) has led me to helping out with various crosswiki issues, and I would really like to able to go further on providing this assistance, using steward tools. I have been hanging in the IRC channel #wikimedia-stewards (from which I make a lot of requests regarding long term crosswiki vandals) for more than 3 years so I'm already in the swing of things. Over time, I have become familiar with most of the steward policies, and I think my crosswiki experience has gotten good enough now. Thanks, Elfix 22:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]

    My user pages: @frwiki ⋅ @commons
български:
  • Езици: fr-N, en-3
  • Лична информация: Здравейте всички! След 4 години дейност в проектите на Уикимедия, реших да се кандидатирам за текущите избори. Администратор съм на френската Уикипедия от 2008 година и доброволец в екипа по имейл кореспонденцията (OTRS) от 2009 година.

    Покрай наскорошните ми дейности като чекюзър в Уикипедия на френски (избран през 2010 г.) често помагам за решаването различни проблеми, касаещи много уикита, и бих искал да продължа да оказвам помощта си, използвайки и инструментите на стюардите. Вече повече от 3 години редовно вися в IRC канала #wikimedia-stewards (в който отправям много от заявките си към стюарди, свързани с кросуики вандали), така че вече съм напълно наясно с нещата. С времето се запознах с почти всички политики, които стюардите спазват, и мисля, че опитът ми с работата в различни уикита е достатъчно задълбочен. Благодаря ви, Elfix 22:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]

    Моите потребителски страници: @ френската Уикипедия ⋅ @ Общомедия
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: fr-N, en-3
  • Informationen zur Person: Hallo an alle. Nach vier Jahren Aktivität auf Wikimedia-Projekten habe ich mich entschieden, bei der aktuellen Stewardwahl anzutreten. Ich bin seit 2008 Admin in der französischsprachigen Wikipedia und OTRS-Mitarbeiter seit 2009.

    Meine neuere Aktivität als Checkuser-Berechtigter auf frwiki (seit 2010) brachte mich dazu, bei verschiedenen projektübergreifenden Problemen zu helfen, und ich wäre wirklich sehr gerne in der Lage, dies durch Gebrauch der Steward-Knöpfe auszubauen. Meine seit mehr als drei Jahren regelmäßige Präsenz im IRC-Kanal #wikimedia-stewards hat mir ermöglicht, im Laufe der Zeit die meisten Regeln für den Gebrauch der Steward-Funktionen kennenzulernen und hat meine „Crosswiki-Erfahrung“ gesteigert.

    Meine Benutzerseiten: @frwiki ⋅ @commons
español:
  • Idiomas: fr-N, en-3
  • Información personal: ¡Hola a todos! Después de cuatro años de actividad en proyectos de Wikimedia, he decidido por lanzarme en las elecciones actuales. Incluyo de los administratores de frwiki después de 2008, y voluntario por OTRS después de 2009.

    Mi actividad más reciente como checkuser en frwiki (después de 2010) ha me dirigido, a muchos repuestos, proporcionar mi contribución de solucionar varias problemas crosswiki (es decir, tocando muchos proyecots Wikimedia), y amaría mucho poder continuar a entregar esta ayuda (más incluso) con los útiles de steward. Continua mi presencia al canal IRC #wikimedia-stewards por más de 3 años ha me prometido, con tiempo, conocerme con mucha de las reglas de uso de útiles de steward y me incremento experiencia crosswiki.

    Gracias. Elfix 22:40, 23 de enero de 2012 (UTC).

    Páginas de usuario: @ frwiki - @commons
فارسی:
  • زبان‌ها: fr-N, en-3
  • اطلاعات شخصی: سلام بر همگی. پس از چهار سال فعالیت در پروژه‌های ویکی‌مدیا، تصمیم گرفتم در انتخابات جاری ثبت نام کنم. من از سال ۲۰۰۸ در ویکی فرانسوی مدیر بوده‌ام و از سال ۲۰۰۹ یک داوطلب OTRS.

    فعالیت‌های اخیر من به عنوان یک بازرس کاربر در ویکی فرانسوی (منصوب به سال ۲۰۱۰) موجب شده در مسائل مختلف میان‌ویکیایی دخیل شوم، و بسیار مایلم تا بتوانم با استفاده از ابزارهای ویکی‌بدی کمک‌هایم را گسترش دهم. من در کانال آی‌آرسی #wikimedia-stewards برای بیش از سه سال حضور مداوم داشته‌ام؛ بنابراین کاملاً درگیر آن هستم. با گذشت زمان، من با اکثر سیاست‌های ویکی‌بدی آشنا شده‌ام، و گمان می‌کنم که هم‌اکنون تجربهٔ میان‌ویکیایی من به اندازهٔ کافی خوب شده باشد. متشکرم، Elfix 22:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]

    صفحات کاربری من: در ویکی فرانسوی ⋅ در انبار
suomi:
  • Kielet: fr-N, en-3
  • Henkilökohtaiset tiedot: Hei kaikki. Neljän vuoden aktiivisuuden jälkeen Wikimedia-projekteissa olen päättänyt asettua ehdolle näissä vaaleissa. Olen ollut ylläpitäjä frwikissä vuodesta 2008 ja OTRS-vapaaehtoinen vuodesta 2009.

    Viimeaikainen aktiivisuuteni osoitepaljastajana frwikissä (nimitetty 2010) johdosta olen auttanut myös erilaisissa wikienvälisissä asioissa, ja haluaisin todella pystyä avustamaan näissä asioissa paremmin ylivalvojatyökalujen avulla. Olen käyttänyt IRC-kanavaa #wikimedia-stewards yli 3 vuotta, joten olen jo perillä asioista. Ajan myötä olen tullut tutuksi useimpien ylivalvojakäytäntöjen kanssa, ja luulen saaneeni tähän mennessä tarpeeksi wikienvälistä kokemusta. Kiitos, Elfix 22:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]

    Käyttäjäsivuni: @frwiki · @commons
français:
  • Langues : fr-N, en-3
  • Renseignements personnels : Bonjour ! Après 4 ans d'activité sur les projets Wikimédia, j'ai décidé de me lancer pour les présentes élections. Je fais partie des administrateurs de frwiki depuis 2008, et je suis volontaire OTRS depuis 2009.

    Mon activité un peu plus récente en tant que vérificateur d'adresses IP depuis 2010 m'a mené, à plusieurs reprises, à apporter ma contribution pour solutionner divers problèmes crosswiki (c'est-à-dire, touchant plusieurs projets Wikimedia), et j'aimerais beaucoup pouvoir continuer à fournir cette aide (voire plus) avec les outils de steward. Ma présence continue sur le canal IRC #wikimedia-stewards depuis plus de 3 ans m'a permis, avec le temps, de connaître la plupart des règles d'utilisation des outils de steward et a accru mon expérience crosswiki.

    Merci. Elfix 22:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
magyar:
  • Nyelvek: fr-N, en-3
  • Személyes információk: Személyi információ: Hello mindenki. Után 4 éve tevékenységnek Wikimedia terv, Nekem van eldöntött futni az aktuális választás. Vagyok admin frwiki óta 2008, és OTRS önkéntes óta 2009.

    több modern tevékenységem mint egy checkuser frwiki (kijelöl 2010BAN) vezetett engem segítség kinn változatos crosswiki problémaval, és Én volna valóban szeret tudni menni későbbiekben feltéve ez segítség, használ pincér eszközök. Vagyok akasztás az IRC csatorna #wikimedia-stewardsban (-ból melyik csinálok rengeteg kérés illetően hosszú időszak crosswiki vandál) több mint 3 év így Vagyok már a hintázik of dolgokban. Felül idő, Nekem van lesz járatos legtöbb a pincér politikanak, és gondolom crosswiki tapasztalatom be klassz most. Kösz, Elfix

    Pages utilisateur : sur frwiki ⋅ sur commonswiki
italiano:
  • Lingue: fr-N, en-3
  • Informazioni personali: Ciao a tutti! Dopo 4 anni di attività nei progetti Wikimedia, ho deciso di concorrere per questa elezione. Sono amministratore di fr.wiki dal 2008 e volontario OTRS dal 2009.

    La mia recente attività come checkuser su fr.wiki (assegnatami nel 2010) mi ha permesso di far fronte a varie questioni crosswiki e mi piacerebbe davvero essere in grado di fornire ancora questa assistenza, usando gli strumenti degli steward. Sono stato attaccato al canale IRC #wikimedia-stewards per più di 3 anni e so già come vanno le cose. Nel corso del tempo, sono divenuto familiare con la maggior parte delle policy degli steward e penso che la mia esperienza crosswiki ora sia abbastanza buona. Grazie, Elfix 22:40, 23 gennaio 2012 (UTC).
    Pagine d’utente: @frwiki ⋅ @commons

Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid: fr-N, en-3
  • Persoonlijke informatie: Hallo allemaal. Na vier jaar activiteit op Wikimedia-projecten heb ik besloten deel te nemen aan deze verkiezingen. Ik ben sinds 2008 een moderator op frwiki en sinds 2009 een OTRS-vrijwilliger.

    Mijn meer recente bezigheden als checkuser op frwiki (aangesteld in 2010) brachten mij in de gelegenheid om te helpen met allerlei crosswiki-zaken, en ik zou heel graag door willen gaan met het verlenen van deze hulp, met gebruik van steward-tools. Ik ben meer dan drie jaar te vinden op het IRC-kanaal #wikimedia-stewards, dus ik ben reeds bekend met de gang van zaken. In de loop der tijd heb ik het stewardbeleid grotendeels leren kennen, en ik denk dat ik nu voldoende crosswiki-ervaring heb opgedaan. Bedankt, Elfix 22:40, 23 januari 2012 (UTC).

    Mijn gebruikerspagina's: op frwiki ⋅ op commonswiki
Tiếng Việt:
  • Ngôn ngữ: fr-N, en-3
  • Thông tin cá nhân: Chào mọi người. Sau 4 năm hoạt động tại các dự án Wikimedia, tôi đã quyết định góp một chân ứng viên trong cuộc bầu cử này. Tôi đã là bảo quản viên tại frwiki từ năm 2008, và làm tình nguyện viên OTRS từ năm 2009.

    Các hoạt động gần đây của tôi, với vai trò kiểm định viên trên frwiki (bổ nhiệm năm 2010), đã dẫn tôi đến trợ giúp nhiều vấn đề liên wiki khác nhau, và tôi thực sự muốn tiến xa hơn qua những trợ giúp này bằng cách sử dụng công cụ tiếp viên. Tôi trực kênh IRC #wikimedia-stewards đã hơn 3 năm nay vì vậy tôi quan sát được nhiều việc. Theo thời gian, tôi đã trở nên quen thuộc với hầu hết các quy định dành cho tiếp viên, và tôi nghĩ rằng kinh nghiệm liên wiki mà mình nhận được đã đủ tốt. Xin cảm ơn, Elfix 22:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]

    Trang cá nhân của tôi: @frwiki ⋅ @commons

Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2012/Questions#Elfix


  Yes

edit
  1. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  strong support, helpful, experienced user! Good candidate! —DerHexer (Talk) 00:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
       Man2fly2002 (Not eligible, checked by axpde) •  No reason why not. [Man2fly2002 ܐܫܘܪܝܐ] 00:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Barras (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  No reason why not. Barras 00:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Vituzzu 00:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Jcaraballo (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Jcaraballo 00:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. MBisanz (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  MBisanz talk 00:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Katarighe (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Katarighe (Talk) 00:18, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Wikit 00:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Alexander Doria (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  Alexander Doria 00:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Jon Harald Søby 00:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Thehelpfulone (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  The Helpful One 01:30, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  Courcelles 01:36, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Borovv (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Yes! Borovv 01:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Shizhao 03:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012 •  Érico Júnior Wouters 03:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. FrankyLeRoutier (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Yes. FrankyLeRoutier 04:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. محمد الجداوي (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  M.Gedawy Talk 04:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Matanya 06:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Addihockey10 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Addihockey10 06:08, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Filzstift (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Pourquoi pas? Filzstift 06:37, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Nixón (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Nixón 06:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Vago (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Vago 06:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Nihonjoe (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Philippe (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  --Philippe 08:28, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Americophile (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  AMERICOPHILE 09:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Binabik155 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Binabik155 09:12, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  Bonne chance Laurent Jerry 10:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Reder (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Reder 10:59, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  -- Good candidate. Wagino 20100516 11:16, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. TBloemink (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  of course TBloemink talk 12:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Guillom (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Elfix is a smart, dedicated and trustworthy Wikimedian doing excellent work on the French Wikipedia and on cross-wiki vandalism. He has handled many sensitive issues with great care and success, and his good work has naturally rewarded him with a few grudges from trolls and coteries of disgruntled users. He'll make an excellent addition to the team and an outstanding steward. guillom 12:25, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mátyás (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Don't see why not Mátyás 12:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Although he doesn't have a lot cross-wiki experience (besides his work on the French Wikipedia), I see progression and I'm sure he'll be very helpful from now on for the current group of stewards. Trijnstel 12:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Marc-André Beauchamp (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Je suis totalement pour, conaissant l'utilisateur - Parfait pour le statut! Marc-André Beauchamp 13:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Totodu74 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  And I certainly don't agree with defamations by Suprememangaka. Totodu74 13:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Xic667 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Xic667 13:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Sebleouf (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  Elfix is a really good wikimedian and a nice guy. He deserves to become a steward. Sebleouf 13:50, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  Wpollard 14:15, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Udufruduhu (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  The comments of Suprememangaka below are totally biased and only based of some personal vendetta against the candidate Udufruduhu 14:24, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Cbyd 14:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Vdkdaan (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Vdkdaan 14:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Theoliane (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  of course Theoliane 14:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. ILJR (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  ILJR 14:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Ca$e (Eligible, checked by bennylin)2012 •  Ca$e 15:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Trollhead (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Trollhead 15:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Gdgourou (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Gdgourou 15:19, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Arkanosis (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  for sure — Arkanosis ✉ 15:30, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Égoïté (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  yes, yes and yes. Of course. --Égoïté 15:41, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Indeed (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Indeed 16:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Kropotkine 113 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Kropotkine 113 16:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Ben76210 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Ben76210 16:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Barbe-Noire (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Barbe-Noire 16:14, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Defeder (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  of course Defeder 16:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Mike Coppolano (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  And I certainly don't agree with defamations by Suprememangaka. Elfix will make an excellent addition to the team and an outstanding steward. Mike Coppolano 16:37, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Alcide talon (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Alcide talon 16:45, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Bzh-99 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Bzh-99 16:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Mmenal (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Manuel Menal 17:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Alchemica (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Has been a trustworthy user on FR for years, and does a great job. Alchemica 17:41, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Pundit (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  good luck! :) Pundit 18:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Olivier Bommel (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  18:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Pucesurvitaminee (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Pucesurvitaminee 18:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Darkoneko (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  I have in unconditional trust in that person. DarkoNeko 18:21, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  62. VonTasha (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Trustworthy VonTasha 18:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Remi Mathis (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Remi Mathis 18:44, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  64. JohnThorne (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  JohnThorne 19:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Ofol (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  bonne chance ! Ofol 19:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Bouchecl (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Good candidate. Bouchecl 19:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Chaoborus (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Chaoborus 19:37, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Pixeltoo (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Pixeltoo 19:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Moez (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  I believe Elfix will be of great help to the actual pool of stewards. He is completely trustworthy, as his many years as a CU testifies. Moez talk 20:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Edhral (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Without a doubt. Elfix is very committed with his check-user and sysop responsabilities on fr:WP. Elfix, bravo de t'être lancé ! --Edhral 20:20, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Hégésippe Cormier (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Comments. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 20:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  72. JurriaanH (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  JurriaanH 20:41, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Ask21 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Ask21 20:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Akeron (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Akeron 21:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Narayan89 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Narayan89 21:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  - @lestaty discuţie 21:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Grondin (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •   Bertrand GRONDIN   → (Talk) 22:44, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  78. VIGNERON (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  VIGNERON * discut. 22:56, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Gribeco (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Gribeco 01:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Wgfinley (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Wgfinley 07:24, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Manoillon (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Manoillon 07:44, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  82. ONaNcle (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  ONaNcle 09:00, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Mediatus (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Mediatus 09:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  trusted by community, willing to help billinghurst sDrewth 10:52, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Lukasz2 (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Lukasz2 11:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Micki (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  mickit 12:46, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  87. PierreSelim (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012 •  Very good candidate IMO PierreSelim 13:11, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Bserin (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012 •  No restriction Bserin 13:18, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Thesupermat (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012 •  Thesupermat 13:27, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Kiran Gopi (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012 •  Kiran Gopi 13:33, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012 •  --Zeljko 13:53, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Shivanarayana (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Shivanarayana 14:49, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Kikuyu3 (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012 •  Rather agree with Guillom than the systematically opponent gang + already met this thrustworthy gentleman. Confident that he will do a good job, once more. Kikuyu3 15:06, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Yodaspirine (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012 •  Yodaspirine 15:53, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012 •  Pharaoh of the Wizards 16:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Mirgolth (Eligible, checked by Wiki13)2012 •  Mirgolth 17:06, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  97. VasilievVV (Eligible, checked by Wiki13)2012 •  vvvt 17:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  98. GLec (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  GLec 18:09, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Anthere (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Anthere 21:28, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Cantons-de-l'Est (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  He is a good contributor and he is willing to learn. Cantons-de-l'Est 22:19, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Romaine (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Romaine 00:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Windchaser (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Windchaser 01:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Slon02 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Slon02 02:20, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Taichi (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Taichi - (あ！) 02:36, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Bruno2wi (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  --Bruno2wi ↗au zinc ♫ 07:37, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Alexanderps (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Alex Pereira falaê 09:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Vive la Rosière (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Let's see. V!v£ l@ Rosière /Murmurer…/ 12:17, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Wikinade (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Wikinade 13:27, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Kyah117 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Trustworthy Kyah117 14:53, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Acer11 (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  experienced user + good willing = strong support Acer11 16:21, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Pmlineditor)2012 •  French & English + checkuser in FrWiki + 4 years of activity on Wikimedia projects - so, I support. Brateevsky 17:27, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Fuucx (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Fuucx 19:14, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Dungodung (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Diligent user, yes FiliP ██ 20:02, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Toto Azéro (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Toto Azéro follow the guide ! 20:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Lebrouillard (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Lebrouillard 00:35, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Sj (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Yes, please. –SJ talk | translate   00:46, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Mikhailov Kusserow (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Mikhailov Kusserow 07:21, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Henryk Borawski (Verification pending) • 
  119. Asav (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Asav 11:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Taweetham (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Taweethaも 13:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  121. (:Julien:) (Eligible, checked by Shizhao)2012 •  trusted and competent. (:Julien:) 13:45, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Ngagnebin (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Ngagnebin 15:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Erdrokan (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Erdrokan 15:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Armbrust 16:40, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Duffyduck97 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Duffyduck97 21:17, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Fr33kman (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  fr33kman 22:16, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Xania (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Xania 22:48, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Theking17825 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Theking17825 01:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Bhawani Gautam (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Bhawani 05:24, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Deu (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 • . Deu. 10:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  131. M 93 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  M 93 11:25, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Floflo (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  I know Elfix and know he can be trusted. Floflo 14:06, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Esprit Fugace (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Esprit Fugace 16:55, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  134. FlügelRad (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  ok FlügelRad 18:01, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Glane23 (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Geoff Who, me? 23:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Serein (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Serein 01:11, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  137. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  B20180 04:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Wjalves (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  Jardel @lves msg 04:09, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Eric.LEWIN (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Eric.LEWIN 04:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Jules78120 (Eligible, checked by Puffin)2012 •  Jules78120 07:10, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Mihewag (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Mihewag 08:55, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Abaddon1337 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  good trust in this contributor Abaddon1337 09:55, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Lucasbfr (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  -- lucasbfr talk 11:17, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Zivax (Eligible, checked by Puffin)2012 •  Zivax 16:15, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Baba Tabita (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012 •  Baba Tabita 17:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Hurricanefan25 (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012 •  Hurricanefan25 19:43, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Rax (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  ok Rax 23:45, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Alanscottwalker (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  Alanscottwalker 00:19, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Tranminh360 (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Tranminh360 (talk) 01:50, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  150. J7729 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  J7729 05:40, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
       Mrko7853 (Not eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ) •  Mrko7853 17:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Hoff1980 (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012 •  Hoff1980 17:27, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012 •  Wiki13 18:58, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Bua333 (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012 •  Bua333 20:58, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Aytrus (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012 •  Aytrus 01:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  155. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  OlEnglish (Talk) 08:08, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  156. O.Taris (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  O.Taris 10:58, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Odisha1 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  --Srikant Kedia 12:52, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
       Rink-hockey44 (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  Rink-hockey44 13:13, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Pratyeka (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Pratyeka 16:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  159. ChristianT (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  ChristianT 21:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Gjue (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012 •  Gjue (talk) 04:03, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Albertus Aditya (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Albertus Aditya (talk) 09:59, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
       Mmistmurt (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  Mmistmurt (talk) 16:27, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Roberto Mura (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 17:09, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Pjoef (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  pjoef (talk • contribs) 19:59, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  164. emes (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Emes (talk) 22:40, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Salvidrim (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012 •  Salvidrim (talk) 03:37, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Wholle (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Wholle (talk) 06:33, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Gormo (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Gormo (talk) 13:58, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Bapti (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  trustworthy user Bapti (talk) 16:45, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Padawane (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  bonne chance. P@d@w@ne 09:38, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Phe (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Phe (talk) 10:15, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Cobra bubbles (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Cobra bubbles (talk) 17:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  172. Bazj (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Bazj (talk) 17:56, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Varnent (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Varnent (talk) 19:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  174. Samir (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012 •  Samir 02:49, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Doc103 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Doc103 (talk) 08:52, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Sail over (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Sail over (talk) 10:55, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Sokac121 (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Comments. Sokac121 (talk) 11:58, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  178. GastelEtzwane (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  GastelEtzwane (talk) 15:21, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Jastrow (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2012 •  Sound and reliable. Jastrow (talk) 18:53, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Obelix (talk) 23:58, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Asram (Eligible, checked by Ankit Maity)2012 •  Why not ? Seems to be involved. Asram (talk) 00:57, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Perditax (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Perditax (talk) 23:07, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  183. OohBunnies! (Eligible, checked by Ankit Maity)2012 •  OohBunnies!Not just any bunnies... 11:17, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Jmex (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  excellent candidate Jmex (talk) 17:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Gede (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Diligent and dedicated to the project. Gede (talk) 00:51, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Cedalyon (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Cedalyon (talk) 06:29, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Ludo29 (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  Ludo29 (talk) 12:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  188. Beria (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012 •  Béria Lima msg 18:34, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  189. Avraham (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012 •  Avi (talk) 20:27, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Piotr967 (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57)2012 • . Piotr967 (talk) 11:36, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  191. Chandres (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  still zen ... Chandres (talk) 14:35, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  192. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  Works for me. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 19:24, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Yair rand (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  Blanket   Support for all candidates as opposition to the blanket opposition by User:Riffic, in support of open balloting. Yair rand (talk) 01:10, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  194. Jewbask (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  Comments. Jewbask (talk) 01:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  195. Night of the Big Wind (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  Night of the Big Wind (talk) 02:12, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  196. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  Zyephyrus (talk) 18:49, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  197. Mandeville (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Mandeville (talk) 16:48, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  198. seewolf (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012 •  Harald Krichel (talk) 19:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Ceradon (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Definitely. Ceradon (talk) 01:23, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  200. SeoMac (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  SeoMac (talk) 02:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  201. Hoo man (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Hoo man (talk) 19:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  202. Bk1 168 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  --Bk1 168 (talk) 23:16, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  203. Bennylin (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  Is okay. And per Yair_rand. ✒ Bennylin 14:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Indif (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  --Indif (talk) 18:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  205. MuZemike (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  MuZemike (talk) 20:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  206. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  πr2 (t • c) 22:28, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. Ebe123 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  I think that the user should become a member of the SWMT, and as fr.wiki has lots of counter-vandalism members, let the others when appropriate. Other than that, no problems. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 00:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Not much xwiki experience, and not enough counter-vandalism past language barriers for someone who wants to be globally blocking and locking users. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:14, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Suprememangaka (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  The multiple missuses of the CheckUser tools at fr.wikipedia and the constant violation of the privacy and checkuser policies really prevent me from supporting you. Indeed you've many time published sensible informations, even when clearly not necessary. There are dozens of recent exemples : 11 January 2012 (diff), 9 January 2012 (diff), 26 December 2011 (first handled correctly, but the IP is finally published without any reason), etc. -- SM ** =^^= ** 00:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    This statement is untruthful, and I've responded to the accusations on the talk page. I've also asked the ombudsmen to look into them and leave their findings here. Elfix 12:33, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    There is an ongoing discussion related to this vote or comment which can be found on the talk page.
    This is an Election Committee action made by Wikitanvir because potential long discussion is not allowed on the vote page and should be moved to the respective talk page.
  4. Jeffwang (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  MORE LANGUAGES NEEDED Jeffwang 01:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    I was first inclined to support you as I know you're helping a lot on frwiki and your answers to the questions were quite good. But the facts mentioned above are not compatible with having the steward tools. Stewards have to respect the policies literally. Sorry, Quentinv57 (talk) 06:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC) temporarily moved to neutral, waiting the answer of the Ombudsman Commission[reply]
  5. Vugar 1981 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  N KOziTalk 07:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Ul1-82-2 (Eligible, checked by Geitost)2012 •  Ul1-82-2 07:24, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  FASTILY (TALK) 08:24, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Inadequate cross wiki experience - get that then steward Herby talk thyme 08:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    I join the opinion of Quentinv57. No respect of policies literally. User:Superjuju10
  9. Coyote du 86 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Per Suprememangaka and Quentinv57 Coyote du 86 10:22, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Craig Rzayev (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Craig Rzayev 10:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Morphypnos (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  I prepared to vote for you but what I have just seen on behalf of him and him makes me change opinion. I find that totally stunning and incompatible with the function of steward. However, I have nothing against you, but I think that these carelessnesses do not correspond chargeable to steward. Good continuation.
  12. Wvk (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Not much interwiki experience Wvk 13:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Meodudlye (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  impossible for me to trust this user for such a sensitive role. And guillom, could you refrain from considering that people who do not agree with you are trolls ? Meodudlye 13:50, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Addendum : Elfix does some CU without any request made (see here) and is not shy to admit it. CUs have access to information considered as private, and users can expect their privacy to be respected. Elfix proves that he does not care about it. What will happen when, as stewart, he has CU rights on small wikis? Will the privacy of their users be protected? Not with him I'm afraid. Meodudlye (talk) 16:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    No rule was broken here (otherwise I am still waiting for you to point it to me I hadn't noticed that you were blocked for 8 months on fr.wikipedia.org. I encourage you then to point it to me directly on meta), and no one's privacy was violated. Once again, with your weak activity on fr.wikipedia and this allegation, you are proving that you are seeking reasons to vote against me, but without actually particularly caring about them (as long as you can draw some negative opinions from the others to me). Elfix (talk) 16:41, 18 February 2012 (UTC) 16:45, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Maybe you haven't read en:WP:NPA ? I advise you to read it, as a stewart, you may need it. And you answer proves that you do not mind answering people's concern, when they point to mistakes you did when using your quite sentitive tools. Since you are well underway to get elected, I wish good luck to the contributors all across wikipedia who will have to deal with you weird view on your own responsibility. Meodudlye (talk) 18:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Nemoi (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Nemoi 15:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Hatonjan (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Hatonjan 19:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Pic-Sou (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  per SM --Pic-Sou 19:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  NaBUru38 21:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  20000 edits on French, 100 on English, and 400 on Commons. There is not enough cross Wiki experience. Blue Rasberry (talk) 05:38, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Anne-theater (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Anne-theater 00:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Tiptoety (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Tiptoety talk 01:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Striker (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  I'd like to see more cross-wiki experience. Striker talk 13:07, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Odder (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  odder (talk) 16:52, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. WizardOfOz (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Not much crosswiki experience. WizardOfOz talk 20:02, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Thompson.matthew (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Thompson.matthew 09:57, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Mercy (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Not enough experience. Mercy 11:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Anacleto 00 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  I wish he had a little bit more x-wiki experience! Anacleto 00 16:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Beyond My Ken (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Beyond My Ken 10:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  due to CU accusations, otherwise + Hedwig in Washington 02:51, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Begoon (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Begoon 08:09, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Guido den Broeder (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012 •  Guido den Broeder 20:02, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. X-Fi6 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  I feel you need more cross-wiki experience X-Fi6 07:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  same as above. —MZaplotnik (contribs) 08:21, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Paramecium (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  not enough crosswiki experience Paramecium 12:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Mehran (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Per Blue Rasberry. Mehran Debate 05:16, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Tgeairn (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  Local (potentially) unresolved issues at -fr. We need our Stewards clean of noise. Tgeairn (talk) 00:21, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Trongphu (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Trongphu (talk) 04:22, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. riffic (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Blanket 'NO' votes for all candidates to protest open balloting. riffic (talk) 08:41, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Alia 2005 (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Alia 2005 (talk) 15:48, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Smartcom5 (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  The way he (re-) acts disqualifies him – at least in my opinion. And since he didn't got my unquestionable confidence, i say 'no'. Smartcom5 (Any thoughts ?) 17:34, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Salvio giuliano (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012 •  Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:54, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Ooswesthoesbes (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  not enough cross-wiki experience OosWesThoesBes (talk) 11:11, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Epbr123 (Eligible, checked by PeterSymonds)2012 •  Epbr123 (talk) 10:08, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Beeswaxcandle (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Regretfully I must vote no because of the overly defensive tone of the replies to the possible issue under investigation. A Steward needs to be able to explain hir actions without coming across as thinking that they were probably wrong. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 23:19, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    I have been accused a lot of times - for years - by that person (and only that person) to abuse my checkuser tools. Those accusations were never founded, no diffs had ever been given. I hope this helps you understand why I get to be a bit aggressive over time - mostly since this is the first time - on this voting page - that I see diffs coming along with the accusations. Elfix 23:25, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Orsb (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  Orsb (talk) 08:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  minhhuy (talk) 02:08, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Fetchcomms (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  ←fetchcomms 02:59, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
       Eddyghazaley (Not eligible, checked by Geitost) •  Has all the requirements for a well-established user. Regardless, he/she still requires more experience. Eddyghazaley 07:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Martin1978 (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Martin1978 08:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Przemub (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Przemub 08:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Morning Sunshine (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  Morning Sunshine 11:21, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Guerillero (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Guerillero 13:22, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Kelam (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Kelam 16:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Superjuju10 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir)2012 •  Superjuju10 17:49, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. T137 (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  T137 02:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. U.Steele (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  never seen U.Steele 06:57, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Bidgee (Eligible, checked by Bencmq)2012 •  Bidgee (Talk) 08:15, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Extra999 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Extra999 13:52, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Saga City (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Saga City 09:55, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Puffin (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10)2012 •  Puffin 21:56, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. AGK (Eligible, checked by Reder)2012 •  I'm not familiar enough with the candidate's work to determine if he is suited to this role, but he appears to be a great contributor. AGK [•] 22:55, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by axpde)2012 •  Insufficient language. Equivalents are not accepted İncelemeelemani 22:07, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Don4of4 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Don4of4 03:22, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. GatoSelvadego (Eligible, checked by Hazard-SJ)2012 •  GatoSelvadego 14:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  more content work on projects other than frwiki John Vandenberg 14:51, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by Savh)2012 •  CT Cooper · talk 15:19, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Sammyday (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012 •  I'm waiting for the Ombudsman commission's results. Sammyday (talk) 01:27, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Reade (Eligible, checked by Logan)2012 •  Reade (talk) 00:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Briegers (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew)2012 •  Briegers (talk) 11:14, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Njaelkies Lea (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516)2012 •  Njaelkies Lea (talk) 17:53, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
       mmovchin (Not eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone) •  --Mmovchin (talk) 19:46, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Quentinv57 (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone)2012 •  Finally I will vote neutral. During these three weeks of elections, I've discussed with Elfix and I'm more and more convinced that he is working in good faith. However, as for me some things were done (even not intentionally) out of the privacy policy and the Ombudsman Commission did not say me yet that there is no violation of the policy. So I can't support at this stage. Sorry, Quentinv57 (talk) 15:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2012/Votes/Elfix&oldid=26366919"