Stewards/Confirm/2013/es

< Stewards‎ | Confirm‎ | 2013
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.
Stewards (2013 Confirmations)
Español :

Las confirmaciones de 2013–14 empiezan el 8 de febrero y finalizarán el 28 de febrero.

Las confirmaciones de steward son una buena oportunidad para ver si aún estamos contentos con nuestros stewards actuales. Para facilitar el proceso, así es como se organizarán las cosas:

Para comentar, inicia sesión con una cuenta creada con anterioridad al 1 de febrero de 2013 y que tenga ediciones en algún proyecto. Durante las elecciones del 2013, menciona si estás descontento con alguna de las personas listadas debajo y por qué. Por ejemplo, puedes mencionar inactividad o comportamiento no conforme a las políticas que regulan la actuación de este grupo. Los stewards inactivos, de acuerdo a la correspondiente política perderán sus permisos. Sólo serán tenidos en cuenta los comentarios que tengan que ver con el uso y desenvolvimiento de sus tareas como stewards. Las confirmaciones no son una votación.

Al final de la elección, los stewards actuales, junto con los nuevos, considerarán los argumentos vertidos en esta página y tomarán una decisión, tomando en cuenta tanto los comentarios de la comunidad, como la propia perspectiva y entendimiento del trabajo propia. Todos los stewards pasarán por este proceso después de cada elección.

Ver también:


Purge the cache of this page?


Andre EngelsEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: en
  • Información personal: Mis disculpas por no hacer una declaración antes. En realidad he estado muy activo como steward, excepto para hacer algo de borrado que me encontré en wikis pequeñas. Preferiría mantener el estatus en caso de que encuentre algo de tiempo y trabajo para hacer como steward en unos pocos meses, pero como no hay planes específicos en este momento entendería totalmente si se me remueve del cargo por inactividad ahora.

Comments about Andre EngelsEdit

  • Remove Remove --Vogone (talk) 00:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove Andre has been inactive as a steward pretty much since last reconfirmation ( 13 edits on meta, 3 steward actions). Snowolf How can I help? 00:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
    I see Andre has now made a statement. I suggest that perhaps, if he's still interested in doing deletion on small wikis, he should consider, in the event that he doesn't get reconfirmed, applying for a global sysop flag. Snowolf How can I help? 00:15, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove solely due to inactivity. --Rschen7754 00:57, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove Inactive. Thanks for your work. Érico Wouters msg 01:20, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove due to inactivity. --Makecat 03:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove White Master (es) 06:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove Inactive steward--Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • You were desysopped on Commons in March 2008. After this you have on several occasions used your steward rights to delete pages on Commons outside of your remit as a steward. Please understand that having global rights is not a license for acting as a local admin in a wiki where you no longer hold the tools. As a separate note and per above, I would suggest removal due to inactivity. Jafeluv (talk) 09:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
    • He also never had local sysop rights on de.WP, but locally blocked a user last year who was only active on de.WP and who was just two minutes ago being "announced" because of vandalism on the local VM twice, there wasn't any need for a steward to act. There are hundreds of local sysops who can do blocks there, especially at that time, a sysop would have done the same one or two minutes later, so I don't understand that at all. I would appreciate an explanation for that also. --Geitost diskusjon 00:09, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove Inactive. Thanks for the work you've done as a steward ! -- Quentinv57 (talk) 09:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove - in the light of low activity and reluctance to make a statement, I'd rather remove the rights. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove - too inactive for my taste. -Barras talk 13:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove Inactive, sorry--Steinsplitter (talk) 15:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove per inactivity. -Mh7kJ (talk) 16:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove --Travelour Talk E - Mail 17:55, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove: Personally I think any steward who fails to create a statement should be disqualified at this point, but there we go. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • A very sad Remove Remove as I really appreciate you and your help, but you were too inactive last year & didn't even create this 'statement'. Trijnsteltalk 22:20, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:14, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove --Waka Waka (talk) 00:11, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove --cyrfaw (talk) 04:38, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Although it's not nice not to see the statement, Andre is formally active enough; thus inactivity is not a valid reason for stewardship removal. And I hope that he'll become more active. --Millosh (talk) 13:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • No statement doesn't look very convincing even if he has the required log actions. Do you want to continue helping here? It would be appreciated. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:08, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
    • Keep now that there's a statement & per Nemo and Ruslik0. I've thought about this and while you've been inactive compared to other users I'd not like to loose the good work you usually do and the background and good advice you provide. I think however we all would be happy if you could increase your activity. Best regards. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 23:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove Sorry but your too inactive to keep steward tools. Techman224Talk 20:57, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove per inactivity.—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 19:59, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep per Millosh and the fact that he now have the statement written. Bennylin 15:54, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Barely active, but Active enough per policy. --Jyothis (talk) 19:16, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep it's up to you to state if you can be helpful as a stewie. --Vituzzu (talk) 23:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Fəaliyyətini qənaətbəxş hesab edirəm. Qaydaları kifayət qədər normal səviyyədə bilir. Zərərsiz olduğu üçün ona etimad göstərirəm. --►Safir yüzüklü Ceklimesaj 04:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 08:14, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep has been around, more activity more useful — billinghurst sDrewth 13:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove Inactive stewards don't need to keep their flags. Ajraddatz (Talk) 17:29, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • GA candidate.svg Weak keep One of the original stewards (only other current steward who was in the first "group" is Mav), therefore one of the most experienced. Besides, he'll be useful. πr2 (t • c) 17:40, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Inactive, but other than that, I don't see any reason to remove. Hurricanefan24 (talk) 17:57, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Neutral Neutral I'd tend to keep given the experience and track of activity as steward and that I'd miss him: decrease of recent activity would not be a good reason alone IMHO, and even just his recent activity is comparable to the activity of other stewards who are passing. However, small activity is an issue if we can't assess his job, and while I trust him I'd like to see a response to Jafeluv above. --Nemo 06:15, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove Inactive --Herby talk thyme 11:44, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove Inactive stewards don't need the tools. Russavia (talk) 16:49, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep. Still chance to be more active.--Jusjih (talk) 13:07, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Neutral Neutral Inactive but I still do not want to lose the longest serving steward. Ruslik (talk) 07:13, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove Inactive -FASTILY (TALK) 21:56, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep trusted. MoiraMoira (talk) 20:28, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[]


AvrahamEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: en, he-2
  • Información personal: Quedo mucho feliz a ver que peticiones en general, y cuestiones checkuser en la que yo tendo de enfocarme en particular, han sido respondidos en tiempo razonable por stewards. Me gustaría continuar apoyar la familia de proyectos de Wikipedia como steward en el año llegada. Muchísimas gracias por su confianza pasado y su cooperación en el presente.

Comments about AvrahamEdit


AxpdeEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: en
  • Información personal: Por motivos de salud no fui capaz de mantenerme en el cargo. Estuve en el hospital durante más de medio año y por lo tante no estuve conectado la mayoría del tiempo. La semana pasada empecé mi rehabilitación laboral - y además de eso preocuparme más de wikipedia/wikimedia de nuevo. Solo, necesitaré mi tiempo, para recuperar mi forma. Entiendo el desagrado por mi ausencia, pero pido clemencia y algo más de tiempo para dar prueba de mi utilidad. Saludos a×pdeHello! 08:03, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[]

Comments about AxpdeEdit

  • Remove Remove --Vogone (talk) 00:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove He became inactive as soon as he got the steward status (see his logged actions on meta). I haven't see him for months, shame that he didn't even said goodbye... -- Quentinv57 (talk) 00:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove. While I am aware that Axpde has had a difficult year, and I don't envy him one bit, he is for all intents are purposes inactive, and the whole idea behind reconfirmation is to evaluate year by year whether continued access to the steward toolset makes sense, and I do not believe it does at this time. Snowolf How can I help? 00:29, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove solely due to inactivity. --Rschen7754 00:59, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove Inactive. Thanks for your work. Érico Wouters msg 01:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC) Keep Keep Looks you are back now and so changing my comment to "keep". Érico Wouters msg 17:49, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove only because of inactivity. --Makecat 03:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove White Master (es) 06:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove --Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • This was unimpressive coming from a steward, and would have been an abuse of tools had you acted on it. However, it's been quite a while since that comment and by itself it's nothing to oppose over. In any case I'm going to support removal due to inactivity. Jafeluv (talk) 09:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove, due to inactivity and lack of statement (=lost touch with the community?) I am aware, though, that willingness to come back would be most welcome. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove - sorry, but no longer really active. -Barras talk 13:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove, too inactive. -Mh7kJ (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove, never active. Ajraddatz (Talk) 16:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
    To expand on my reasoning a bit, Axpde has never been active as a steward, and not really as a global sysop either[1]. Axpde's few actions in the last couple of days are more than (s)he has ever done before. In my mind, applying for stewardship and then only using the rights around the time of a confirmation is an abuse of the trust placed in him by the community. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:18, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove, per Jafeluv and Ajraddatz. I am surprised that, even though active on his home-wiki, he is unable (or unwilling) to perform a single log action or give a reason for his absence here on meta. Savhñ 17:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
    Wow, I had no idea he was active on dewiki. I thought he had been inactive because of health reasons as stated on his meta page. Snowolf How can I help? 17:42, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
    Re-enforcing my comment, in full agreeance with Ajraddatz. Axpde performed, in the 1 year and 4 months he has been steward, no global locks & blocks up to today and a very limited amount of rights changes, a majority of which on test-wikis. There are also quite a few actions/opinions taken by Axpde with which I disagree, adittionally to the diff provided by Jafeluv, such as redirecting your talkpage to your main userpage cross-wiki, thus making communicating with you more complicated for non-English speakers, test-wiki hat-collecting, inmature reactions, abuse of rollback, considering stewards the only trusted users, uncivil reactions and inconsistent actions regarding his own global rights. (These are just a few examples I found looking through his talkpage) The user has also not either yet explained why the inactivity did not affect his homewikis. Savhñ 16:16, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove: Personally I think any steward who fails to create a confirmation statement should be disqualified by this point. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove Didn't do much since being elected in the end of 2011. Per Jafeluv, Ajraddatz and Savh. Trijnsteltalk 22:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:16, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove --cyrfaw (talk) 10:48, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Neutral As with André. No statement does not look very convincing. However the user says he's away for health reasons and I know how that can be utterly annoying. Would you like to continue helping here? -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:14, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
    Remove per recent events such as this wrong removal of rights IMHO. Not suggesting that the requesting user was lying but removal requests without community discussion should be placed by the requesting user. The links given in the request does not mention explicitly a request for rights removal (just a retirement). I'd not have performed that without user confirmation (even the link provided in this diff is private but even if it were public, valid requests should go to SRP). I mean, there's no way to confirm the truly validity of the request. Also there's a record of you performing actions without consensus such as (this recent one) that concerns me. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 23:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove Sorry but your too inactive. Techman224Talk 21:17, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove per inactivity.—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 06:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC) Keep Keep. Looks like you are back now and as that issue with protecting your own user talk page is past, I can see no reasons to remove.—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 02:47, 16 February 2013 (UTC) Neutral Neutral. Not sure.—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 05:29, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Support Support Inactivity due to force majeur. Activity on home-wiki is different matter, as some people prefer the comfort of their mother tongue. Plus, now he has written his statement and still have the willingness. Like a wise Wikimedian once told me, an inactive admin/steward is still better than an active admin/steward who abuse the tool. Bennylin 16:01, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep with the request to resign if you'll have no time to go on being a steward. --Vituzzu (talk) 23:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Qalsın. --►Safir yüzüklü Ceklimesaj 04:56, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Was inactive due to health reasons. --Millosh (talk) 09:42, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep per above --Iste (D) 10:37, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep per above. -Zyephyrus (talk) 08:18, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep more activity, would be good; that said personal health comes first, and way above being a steward (per Vituzzu) — billinghurst sDrewth 13:14, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep per above. --Wnme (talk) 17:40, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep there is a thing known as real life, which can hinder a lot of stuff :| Hurricanefan24 (talk) 17:59, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove per Snowolf and Jafeluv: quite a tendency to the "I have the powers and I'll use them just for the sake of it", IMHO. --Nemo 05:49, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove --Herby talk thyme 11:45, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep. Still chance to be more active.--Jusjih (talk) 13:12, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove I am afraid but the recent spurt of activity is likely to die out after the election. I think you should take time out of the stewards duties and return when you are really ready. Ruslik (talk) 19:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep. Very active. --N KOziTalk 19:33, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Pro, agreeing with Bennylin. Ich stimme mit Bennylin überein. However, I hope you're able to do a few more actions this year. πr2 (t • c) 18:14, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[]


BarrasEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: de, en-4
  • Información personal: Esta es mi segunda confirmación como steward, dado que fui elegido en 2011. He estado bastante activo durante este año de servicios. He usado las herramientas de steward para varios propósitos, como ayudar con borrados y bloqueos crosswiki (mira mis estadísticas como sysop global). También trabajé con vandalismo y spam y lockeé y bloqueé muchos usuarios e IPs. También hice muchos cambios de derechos, principalmente a mi propia cuenta para evitar más abuso y eliminar cosas abusivas, pero también cambié los derechos de muchas otras personas. Habitualmente ayudo en cualquier lugar, donde se necesite ayuda, en el IRC y también en la wiki. Si tienes alguna pregunta, simplemente házmela.

Comments about BarrasEdit


BencmqEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: en
  • Información personal: translation needed

Comments about BencmqEdit


BennylinEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: id, en, jv, zh
  • Información personal: translation needed

Comments about BennylinEdit


BillinghurstEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: en
  • Información personal: Tengo pensado continuar en la pepal de steward, si la comunidad está dispuesto de confirmarme. Tengo principalmente se comprometido los trabajos que yo decía que yo haría cuando fui elegido el año pasado. My mop has been active and consistent in areas of strength Significado inconocido (Nota la traducción) y he comprometido algunas actividades en otras areas como se requiere. Stewardes han trabajados cooperativamente y respetuosamente; como un equipo compartiendo el trabajo, aviso y demandando ayuda como es necesario, ha sido un grupo armonioso y agradable con quién trabajar, y los comendo por su pasión, diligencia y esfuerzos. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:34, 6 de enero de 2013 (UTC)

Comments about BillinghurstEdit

  • Keep Keep Thehelpfulone 00:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Ignacio Flag of Uruguay.svg (talk) 00:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • I love you! :-D —DerHexer (Talk) 00:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Vogone (talk) 00:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep your dedication to the job and activity on this year are incredible. Snowolf How can I help? 00:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Same words as DerHexer just above : I love you and I love what you do ! :-) -- Quentinv57 (talk) 00:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Iste (D) 00:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Rschen7754 01:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 01:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Érico Wouters msg 01:25, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep--Makecat 03:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 10:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep micki 10:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep. Bennylin 10:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 10:52, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 11:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Höstblomma (talk) 11:48, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep I agree with the other stewards above me. I really like your dedication to the fight against the spambots. --Bsadowski1 (talk) 12:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Confirm - What would we do without you? You really do a lot here! Thanks for your work. -Barras talk 13:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep. One of the easiest votes I've made in a long time. -Mh7kJ (talk) 16:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Certainly. --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 16:44, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Jyothis (talk) 17:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Strong keep. Thanks for your great work. Savhñ 17:43, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep g'day. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep every steward I've collaborated with this year. Elfix 18:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Jon Harald Søby (talk) 22:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Per Barras ... in the past year you've become almost irreplaceable. Trijnsteltalk 22:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Meno25 (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Osiris (talk) 02:22, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep MBisanz talk 02:53, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep :D Sotiale (talk) 03:09, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:19, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep, impressively active. -- Mentifisto 16:06, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep kudos Pundit (talk) 17:10, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep -- Tegel (Talk) 17:48, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep -- Alanscottwalker (talk) 20:42, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep -- Avi (talk) 13:34, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Millosh (talk) 13:58, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:21, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep KeepArkanosis 17:32, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Techman224Talk 21:23, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep. Helpful steward, very active on the CU arena. Jafeluv (talk) 18:44, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep - In my capacity as a volunteer. --Philippe (talk) 03:50, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep. His numbers are ridiculously higher in comparison with others. His knowledge is impressive too.—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 06:45, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep. Impressive contribution. What about some more prowess in languages? :D εΔω 09:20, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
    hmm, I think that response is somewhere between ... I speak spambot and IP ... ^&^&#$#%#%!!! ... :-p — billinghurst sDrewth 13:28, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 23:30, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Fəaliyyətini qənaətbəxş hesab edirəm. --►Safir yüzüklü Ceklimesaj 05:02, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep The place would fall apart without you QuiteUnusual TalkQu 09:02, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep  :) --Zyephyrus (talk) 08:22, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Lots of work in an area of steward work where we need the most volunteers. Ajraddatz (Talk) 17:38, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Hurricanefan24 (talk) 18:00, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep - sats (talk) 11:19, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 13:18, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Ruslik (talk) 07:05, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • The level of work has been appreciated --Herby talk thyme 08:34, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Melos (talk) 17:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Peterdownunder (talk) 10:59, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Beeblebrox (talk) 18:34, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep -FASTILY (TALK) 21:57, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Most active steward (actions per day), especially focusing on anti-spam matters. Good on ya, mate. πr2 (t • c) 18:00, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 20:30, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep. LeinaD (t) 21:36, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[]


Bsadowski1Edit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: en
  • Información personal: Esta es mi segunda confirmación como mayordomo. Fui elegido en febrero de 2011 y he estado activo desde entonces. He estado activo como mayordomo al limpiar spam crosswiki y ocuparme de spambots. Espero con ansias otro (nuevo) año de ser un administrador. --Bsadowski1 (hablar) 23:51, 6 de enero de 2013 (UTC)

Comments about Bsadowski1Edit


DerHexerEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1
  • Personal info: Unfortunately, I could not have been as active as in the last years. That's mostly due to my work at university and academy and my changed focus in the Wikiversum: I always want to learn about new parts of the Wikiversum and try to improve their structure and effectivity. Hence, I'm currently working as a member of the board of Wikimedia Deutschland.

    Regarding steward work, we currently have more active users than in the last years so that my main focus changed to teaching and helping them if necessary. Thank you all for your tremendous work! Since some trolls could be prevented from disturbing our projects, the focus of most stewards switched from fighting vandals to locking spambots and blocking open proxies. Although that's useful for our projects, it doesn't give great pleasure to me. Instead, besides assisting my fellows, I helped a bit on SWMT, SRGP, and on IRC and our mailing list.

    Furthermore, I co-organized the annual steward meetup at Wikimania where we planned some improvements for our work. My part was to write a script for a planned global rename policy. Due to some fixes by Hoo man, the script could have been used on secure server when this policy had been accepted (and I still hope that this will happen soon). With deactivating the secure server, the time-consuming programming was all for nothing because the script cannot be used elsewhere. But luckily, the WMF developers are currently working on a global rename tool (or hopefully at least on a rename API).

    I recently became a member of the steward election committee (a job I did in the last couple of years too) and thus hope to approve some new fellows elected by the global community. I'd be happy to serve the community and my beloved fellows with my experience for the next term. Thank you!

Comments about DerHexerEdit

  • Keep Keep because I love you :-) -- Quentinv57 (talk) 00:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Thehelpfulone 00:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep hurra! per Quentinv57 ;-) Vogone (talk) 00:05, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Ignacio Flag of Uruguay.svg (talk) 00:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Iste (D) 00:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep absolutely :) His insights into steward and policy history are invaluable. Snowolf How can I help? 00:25, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Rschen7754 01:01, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 01:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep White Master (es) 06:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep--Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:43, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • I'm slightly concerned about your acting as a steward in your home wiki, including changing userrights with no indication on Meta except for the log entry [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], and to the point that people from dewiki are asking other stewards not to intervene if the request was made to you personally [10]. Stewards are not intended to be local superusers and IMO home wiki actions should be left to uninvolved stewards to ensure impartiality. All that said, current steward policy seems to allow this and since you do a lot of good work I support your confirmation again this year. Jafeluv (talk) 09:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
    The first ones have been done according to our policy that says that non-controversial returns of sysop rights can be done on homewikis. The other ones have been done to serve the community as much as possible (so no super rights for myself), mostly including import rights that have been given out by me since years (and thus is more or less a rule which could be changed of course), and confirmed status which should be non-controversial (and in these cases urgently needed) too but should be handled by local bureaucrats instead, imo. Regarding the Hozro case, other people were wondering why Müdigkeit rushed to meta (I don't know whether he supported Hozro's return of his sysop rights, I regret it) because I usually handle these self-removal requests within the next 48 hours respecting the cool-down period of 24 hours that stewards agreed on a couple of years ago. As you might remember, that reduced some dramaz in the past and did so last year too. If it's controversial or I'm too much involved, I always point users to meta. I also do that (or point them to my user talk page) with requests on IRC or per mail to maximize transparency. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:43, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
    Thanks for the response. Wrt the confirmed flag, it might be worth considering making it an admin-assignable group like on enwiki. After all, dewiki admins can already assign much more restricted rights like editor and autochecked user. Certainly a better solution than finding a friendly steward every time someone needs the confirmed flag, although that's of course ultimately for the local community to decide. Jafeluv (talk) 11:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
    Sure. I'll bring that into discussion of the community asap. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
    + 1, every sysop should be able to do that, not only bureaucrats. Is there a discussion about that yet (didn't find one)? Do we need an MB for that or just a PD with link from there, this should be uncontroversial. --Geitost diskusjon 22:17, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[]
    Well, I partly disagree: Every sysop (who wants to) needs to learn how to use importupload first. This is a powerful, and very dangerous tool (in fact, much more dangerous than all other sysop tools). More helping hands are always useful but currently the importers on dewiki are working very well (without my assistance). But there's no need that I have to teach them myself nor that I assign the rights. But the ones who do should know what this userright affects, shouldn't they? ;-) Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:03, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[]
    I don't understand. What has the importupload right to do with the confirmed right? Autoconfirmed gets every user automatically after 4 days, so where's the problem with confirmed? Why should a sysop first learn the importupload thing for being able to assign confirmed rights? Are we talking about the same? If someone may assign passive editor, editor and IP block exception rights, then confirmed rights are more uncontroversial than these three. Perhaps we should continue to discuss that on de.WP? --Geitost diskusjon 00:31, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[]
    We obviously don't. :-D I was talking about the importer user right I assigned. The confirmed status should be assigned by bureaucrats, or sysop, right. :-) —DerHexer (Talk) 01:18, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep What Quentinv57 said. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 10:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep because I share his feelings towards me ;) Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep micki 10:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep. Bennylin 10:30, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 10:53, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 11:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Höstblomma (talk) 11:46, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Confirm - You already belong to the steward inventory, just like some stewardtools. ;-) -Barras talk 13:39, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Wnme (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Sure. odder (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Love you too! --Jyothis (talk) 17:40, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Strong keep. Obviously. Savhñ 17:45, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep naturlich, ich liebe dich auch (or something). PeterSymonds (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep every steward I've collaborated with this year. Elfix 18:20, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep for his loviness Jon Harald Søby (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Per PeterSymonds. Verdammt, ich lieb' dich. ;) Trijnsteltalk 22:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Keep up the good work. --Meno25 (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep love-machine! Theo10011 (talk) 02:49, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep I love you. MBisanz talk 02:54, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep :D Sotiale (talk) 03:10, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:21, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Sure, great user --Poco a poco (talk) 16:33, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep whole lotta of love ;) Pundit (talk) 17:11, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep -- Tegel (Talk) 17:49, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep-- Mar del Sur (talk) 19:45, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep--Heubergen (talk) 22:41, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep + Botulph (talk) 09:29, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 10:49, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep -- Avi (talk) 13:35, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Millosh (talk) 13:59, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 14:30, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:22, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep KeepArkanosis 17:33, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Techman224Talk 21:26, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep - In my capacity as a volunteer. --Philippe (talk) 03:51, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Holder (talk) 06:37, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep. The steward. --Deskana (talk) 15:47, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep. Redlinux (talk) 22:54, 12 February 2013 (UTC) keep - no doubt)[]
  • Keep Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 23:30, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Fəaliyyətini qənaətbəxş hesab edirəm. --►Safir yüzüklü Ceklimesaj 05:03, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep We're overwhelmed with love! - εΔω 13:52, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 08:24, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep gold — billinghurst sDrewth 13:39, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 14:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Good work. I don't mind the instances of using rights on homewiki much - he hasn't done anything super-controversial. Ajraddatz (Talk) 17:39, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 18:51, 14 February 2013 (UTC) goes without saying[]
  • Keep Keep Hurricanefan24 (talk) 18:01, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep John F. Lewis (talk) 18:07, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Christianrueger (talk) 20:08, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep per Quentin57 :-) Lukas²³ (talk) 22:20, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep  Hazard-SJ  ✈  23:45, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep A very good veteran steward. --Bsadowski1 (talk) 11:15, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Of course. --Niklas 555 (talk) 12:47, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep--Jusjih (talk) 13:20, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep es:Magister Mathematicae 17:08, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Ruslik (talk) 19:25, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep--Emergency doc (talk) 12:57, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Melos (talk) 17:41, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep--Alan ffm (talk) 00:30, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Roy 06:11, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:01, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Schwäbin (talk) 14:54, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Enst38 (talk) 00:37, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Yarl (talk) 21:14, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep--Wolfgang Pehlemann (talk) 13:00, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep. Always good to read your advice, old man.—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 08:23, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Angrense (talk) 11:26, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Tomás66 (talk) 10:01, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • KEEP MoiraMoira (talk) 20:56, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep. LeinaD (t) 21:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep unbedingt behalten, denn was würden wir sonst ohne ihn machen?What would we do without him? (can't imagine that). .oO See also Snowolf, didn't read all of the rest here. Das mit dem Inventar stimmt auch, der wird die Knöppe erst los, wenn er sie selbst irgendwann mal wegwirft (und das hoffentlich noch nicht so bald). ;-) --Geitost diskusjon 22:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep, natürlich. πr2 (t • c) 23:32, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[]


ElfixEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

<Spanish not available, displaying English (help us translate!).>
English:
  • Languages: fr, en-3
  • Personal info: My motivation hasn't changed since my election as a steward a year ago: I would still like to help out with cross-wiki issues. I rarely take care of on-wiki requests; most of the steward operations I have undertaken this year have been done upon my own initiative or upon requests on IRC.


    As to the alleged issues about my use of the CU tools sur frwiki that were raised during my election, the Ombudsman commission has told me not having seen any evidence of breach in the privacy policy, and has given to frwiki checkusers some advice to make sure they are always in compliance with the CheckUser policy.

Comments about ElfixEdit


Fr33kmanEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: en
  • Información personal: translation needed

Comments about Fr33kmanEdit

  • Remove Remove --Vogone (talk) 00:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove Inactive. Thanks for your work. Érico Wouters msg 01:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove solely due to inactivity. --Rschen7754 06:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove --Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:42, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove Unfortunately inactive. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 10:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove - lack of staement, low activity. Thanks for the good work you've done. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 10:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove - Sadly not really active anymore, I see no need for him having those tools. -Barras talk 13:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove sorry--Steinsplitter (talk) 15:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • A very sad Remove remove; just too inactive. -Mh7kJ (talk) 16:31, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep Barely active, but meets the policy requirements. Last action was August 15th, which is within the minimum time frame. --Jyothis (talk) 17:47, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
    Well the policy, as it's currently worded, is going to be pretty much always met, see discussion on the policy talk page. Also, if he had been inactive per policy, we wouldn't be even holding this confirmation as we'd have removed the rights already. Snowolf How can I help? 17:49, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
    We have ruled over that Policy for years now and we havent made any change to that to say otherwise. I thought everybody loved policies around here? :) --Jyothis (talk) 00:26, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
    Yes, but all stewards up for reconfirmation are not inactive per policy, else there wouldn't be a reconfirmation... Snowolf How can I help? 17:38, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
    That is not correct. reconfirmation is a stage for community to raise concerns as well. inactivity is an issue, but that is not the whole point of this exercise. --Jyothis (talk) 00:39, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove: Personally I think any steward who fails to create a confirmation statement should be disqualified by this point. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove - but if this inactivity is work-related, then I sympathize and will support should he run for election again. Ajraddatz (Talk) 21:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove per Peter above -- Quentinv57 (talk) 22:31, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove Due to inactivity and per PeterSymonds. Trijnsteltalk 22:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:22, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep I trust the explanation, and honestly both an army draft and a bypass surgery are not trifle. If he insists he can make it, I'd give the benefit of the doubt. Pundit (talk) 17:14, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
    Just a minor correction: it is not an army draft as far as I know. Snowolf How can I help? 17:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove While it is understandable that this steward had other commitments, this is the second year in a row that he has failed to create his own confirmation statement in time, and hasn't been active in several months. I'm afraid I see a whole lot of userrights and not enough activity to justify their holding, as there's plenty of stewards around and this is a repeat of last year's situation, I am not in favour of retaining the steward tools. I mainly concur with Peter. Snowolf How can I help? 17:35, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep, agreeing with Pundit. πr2 (tc) 00:44, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove --cyrfaw (talk) 10:50, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep For the record. He's formally active enough; thus inactivity is invalid reason. --Millosh (talk) 14:00, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
    That is not correct, the policy is one thing (and if one would satisfy its terms, immediate termination of the steward status would take effect, hence pre-empting the reconfirmation process) but the community is allowed to decide on its own what activity standards it feels are appropriate for stewards thru the reconfirmation process. Snowolf How can I help? 14:39, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove. I suggest you be active for a year without the tools, and propose your candidacy in the next elections. One edit in four months is just too much inactivity, in my opinion, and this is not the first time it happens. For a user with many important rights, I frankly don't have the impression you have time to use them all. Savhñ 17:25, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep - if ever there was a valid reason... no sense losing someone who's a good steward, and had a rough year. --Philippe (talk) 03:46, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep (moral support), per Pundit and Philippe. Bennylin 16:04, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Vituzzu (talk) 23:30, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep İndiyə kimi göstərmiş olduğu fəaliyyətini qənaətbəxş hesab edirəm. Baxmayaraq ki, son zamanlar passivdir. Amma etibarlı bir istifadəçidir. --►Safir yüzüklü Ceklimesaj 05:06, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Neutral Neutral I'm not voting but want to note that your contribution has been valuable and your efforts appreciated. Sorry to hear of your personal challenges QuiteUnusual TalkQu 09:04, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep more activity is obviously better; stewardry isn't more important than RL, look after yourself and have tools that are required for where you expect to be active — billinghurst sDrewth 13:46, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep I have a certain level of respect by now after many issues in past dealings, mostly self-inflicted by myself. Hurricanefan24 (talk) 18:02, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 18:54, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove per Snowolf: we just don't have a track of activity, whether recent or rather old, to base this confirmation on (as Jyothis reminds us to do). --Nemo 05:53, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep. Still chance to be more active.--Jusjih (talk) 13:23, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove I think it would be better for you to take a break from the steward activities and stop worrying about losing your steward access. When you are ready you can return. Ruslik (talk) 06:57, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep - Billinghurst says it for me. --Peterdownunder (talk) 11:16, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Remove Remove Inactive. Sorry. --N KOziTalk 19:36, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[]
  • Keep Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 20:43, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[]


J.delanoyEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

español:
  • Idiomas: en, es-2
  • Información personal: En el riesgo de repetir esencialmente lo que yo he dicho antes, la vida real ya es algo febril y impredecible. Al presenté, mi trabajo y otras responsabilidades no preocupan mucho de mi tiempo, pero no sé si, cuando o por cuanto mis negocios devolverán más ocupan, si no estoy seguro como activó que será en el año próximo. Si ya tengo la confianza de la comunidad, me gustaría servir del proyecto como steward otra vez en 2013. J.delanoygabsadds

Comments about J.delanoyEdit