Global sysops/Vote
This proposal's raw rating is : 1385 / 1802 (76.9%).
One of the main points of concern about this proposal is the ability of global sysop to globally block accounts. (supports 39, 209, 422, 520 / opposes 5, 6, 13, 25, 50, 67, 77, 82, 89, 102, 148, 171, 180, 187, 217, 231, 242, 248, 252, 327, 331, 349, 387 ; plus all the people that voted "as per" them)
The proposal should have been closed a whole month ago. The most viable compromise seems allow the proposal while removing this litigious bit.
so.
The Global Sysop proposal is accepted, with the following rights removed from its original formulation :
- Bypass global blocks (globalblock-exempt)
- Disable global blocks locally (globalblock-whitelist)
- Make global blocks (globalblock)
- Remove global blocks (globalunblock)
DarkoNeko 04:11, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Global sysops (Vote) |
العربية:
مصرى:
( ساعدنا فى ترجمة الرساله دى) و تم فتح التصويت على الفكره و ينتهى التصويت فى 31 يناير.
Беларуская:
(дапамажыце перакласьці гэтае паведамленьне)
Български:
(помогнете ни да преведем това съобщение)
Bosanski:
(Pomozite nam sa prevodom ove poruke!)
Català :
(ajudeu a traduir aquest missatge)
کوردی:
( هاوکاریمان بکە لە وەرگێڕانی ئەم پەیامەدا)
Čeština:
(help us translate this message)
Dansk:
(Hjælp os med at oversætte denne besked)
Deutsch:
(Hilf uns bei der Übersetzung dieser Nachricht!)
Dolnoserbski:
(Pomagaj nam toś tu powěźeńku pśedłožyś)
Ελληνικά:
(βοηθήστε μας να μεταφράσουμε αυτό το μήνυμα)
English:
(help us translate this message)
Esperanto:
(Helpo pri la traduko de tiu noto!)
Español :
(ayúdenos con la traducción de este mensaje)
Euskara:
(Lagun gaitzazu mezu honen itzulpenarekin)
فارسی:
(به ما در ترجمه این متن کمک کنید)
Suomi:
(auta meitä kääntämään tämä viesti)
Français :
(Aidez nous a traduire ce message)
Frysk:
(Help ús dit berjocht oer te setten)
Galego:
(axúdanos a traducir esta mensaxe)
Alemannisch :
(Hilf is bi dr Ibersetzig vu däre Nochricht!)
עברית:
Hrvatski:
(Pomozite nam prevesti ovu poruku!)
Hornjoserbsce:
(Pomhaj nam tutu zdźělenku předłožić)
Magyar:
(Kérjük, segíts más nyelvekre is lefordítani ezt a szöveget!)
Interlingua:
(adjuta nos a traducer iste message)
Bahasa Indonesia:
Italiano:
(aiutarci a tradurre questo messaggio)
日本語:
ភាសាខ្មែរ៖
한국어:
Македонски:
(помогнете ни да ја преведеме оваа порака)
Bahasa Melayu:
(Bantu kami menterjemah pesanan ini)
Nederlands:
Occitan :
(Ajudatz-nos a traduire aqueste messatge)
Kapampangan:
(saupan yu kami king pamaglikas ning kapabaluan a ini)
Polski:
(pomóż nam przetłumaczyć ten komunikat)
Português :
(ajude-nos a traduzir esta mensagem)
Русский:
(помогите нам перевести это сообщение)
Slovenčina:
(pomôžte nám preložiť túto správu)
Српски / srpski:
(Помозите нам са преводом ове поруке!)
Svenska:
(Hjälp oss översätta detta meddelande)
ไทย:
Türkçe:
(bu iletiyi çevirmemize yardımcı olun)
Українська:
(допоможіть перекласти це повідомлення)
Tiếng Việt:
(giúp chúng tôi dịch thông báo này)
粵語:
(幫手譯)
中文(简体):
(help us translate this message)
中文(繁體):
(協助翻譯)
|
Please place your vote at the bottom of the list.
As proposer[1] NW (Talk) 00:00, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - NuclearWarfare checked by (RT) 03:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
Maximillion Pegasus 00:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Maximillion Pegasus checked by (RT) 03:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
Barras talk 00:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Barras checked by (RT) 03:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
James (T|C) 00:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC) I think this is an important position that has long been needed to help the stewards, in the end those who get the bit need to be carefully chosen because of the sensitivity of working with small and growing communities but needed still.
Eligible - Jamesofur checked by (RT) 03:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
- I don't see why not.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:14, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Gordonrox24 checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
vvvt 00:14, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - VasilievVV (vvv) checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
J.delanoygabsadds 00:15, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - J.delanoy checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
···Katerenka (討論) 00:39, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Katerenka checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
Care in choosing these folk is key but this is a needed and useful thing. ++Lar: t/c 00:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Lar checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
- delirious & lost ☯ ~hugs~ 01:34, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Deliriousandlost checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
--WizardOfOz 01:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - WizardOfOz checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
Support This is a good idea. Tempodivalse [talk] 03:04, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Tempodivalse checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
- support. There are good reasons for it; individual wikis can opt out altogether; and problems with individual global sysops can be addressed as explained. Rd232 11:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
GSMR 03:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - GSMR checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
--Bart0278 03:11, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Bart0278 checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
--MisterWiki (talk) 03:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- IRTC1015 03:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - IRTC1015 checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
I agree. --Awesong 03:25, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[✖ not eligible—VasilievVV]
Help needed! Laaknor 03:26, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Laaknor checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
Masrudin 03:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Masrudin checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
Kwj2772 (msg) 03:48, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Moved vote Rechecked. See evidence here and also here - Kwj2772 checked by (RT) 01:22, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
- --Jivee Blau 03:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Jivee Blau checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
Yes. Wq-man 03:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[✖ not eligible—VasilievVV]
Durr. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Juliancolton checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- PeterSymonds 03:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - PeterSymonds checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Nifky? 04:24, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
YES. This facility to be provided only for 3 years. Further, after 3 years also, if no one want to become a Administrator within the Project, then it means that there is no real responsible person in the project. So, if it happens like that then the project should be closed down and no help should be provided from outside the project. --TRYPPN 04:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - TRYPPN checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
The proposal adequately addresses the main issues I had, and will result in large benefits for our smaller wikis. It should be implemented sooner rather than later. — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 04:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Mike.lifeguard checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Definite necessity for our smaller projects. –blurpeace (talk) 08:33, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - blurpeace checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
All help is welcome, and any project can opt-out if the community feels that they don't need (or want) it. –Ejs-80 08:38, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Ejs-80 checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- A fine proposal in favor of our smaller wikis. IShadowed 08:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - IShadowed checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Per my comments at Talk:Global sysops. Tiptoety talk 09:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Tiptoety checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- Those small projects would benefit a lot from this. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 09:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Chamal N checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Long overdue --Herby talk thyme 11:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Herbythyme checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- Yes BejinhanTalk 12:30, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Bejinhan checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
3s 13:11, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - 3s checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
ZorroIII 13:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - ZorroIII checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
LeinaD (t) 14:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC) cross-wiki patrollers are very helpful and part of them should have GS priviliges
Eligible - Leinad checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Ulflarsen 14:38, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Ulflarsen checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
(UTC) [✖ not eligible—VasilievVV]Support --Ellysse 15:43, 7 January 2010
-- Bjoertvedt 14:50, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
--Kjetil_r 16:04, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Kjetil r checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Would definitely be helpful. --Erwin 16:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Erwin checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
I'm a bit skeptical about global blocks, but the rest of the permissions seem fine. --FiliP ██ 16:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Dungodung (FiliP) checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Same as dungy. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:17, 1 January 2010 (UTC) P.S.: Longer German explanation: w:de:Benutzer:DerHexer/Blog#Global_sysops
Eligible - DerHexer checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Jon Harald Søby 16:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Jon Harald Søby checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Multichill 17:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Multichill checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- Atluxity 17:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Atluxity checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- (moved vote) - Some users said vandalism etc. on small projects is a bigger problem than I thought. The proposal seems to be fine. Lolsimon 18:11, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Lolsimon checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- Petter Bøckman 18:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Petter Bøckman checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- Vigorous action 18:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Vigorous action checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Fruggo 18:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Fruggo checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- Sustructu 19:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Per Mike.lifeguard--Vito Genovese 20:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Vito Genovese checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Coffee (talk) 20:46, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Coffee checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- Seddon 20:56, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Seddon checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
iAlex 20:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - iAlex checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Mezelf14 21:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Mezelf14 checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
-- Prince Kassad 23:39, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Prince Kassad checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
--DaB. 23:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC) Why not. As long as they don't interfere in middle and big wikis.
Eligible - DaB. checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- --StG1990 23:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - StG1990 checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
-- smial 23:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Smial checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
⇌ Jake Wartenberg 02:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Jake Wartenberg checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
--ZaDiak 02:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - ZaDiak checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
bibliomaniac15 02:25, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Bibliomaniac15 checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Cirt (talk) 06:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Cirt checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Yes. Pmlineditor ∞ 07:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Pmlineditor checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
-Harrywad 11:28, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Harrywad checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
— putnik 12:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Putnik checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
--MF-W 13:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - MF-Warburg (MF-W) checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Cumulus 14:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Cumulus checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Support lightening the load on stewards with this supporting role. ~ Ningauble 16:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Ningauble is a sysop on a project which will be affected by a shift in steward workload. Ningauble appreciates the assistance provided by stewards when no administrators were patrolling, and does not appreciate attempts to deprecate the votes of those who have a valid interest in the outcome. ~ Ningauble 20:01, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Ningauble checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- Ningauble is a sysop on a project which will be affected by a shift in steward workload. Ningauble appreciates the assistance provided by stewards when no administrators were patrolling, and does not appreciate attempts to deprecate the votes of those who have a valid interest in the outcome. ~ Ningauble 20:01, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Sounds good. Glacier Wolf 16:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Glacier Wolf checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
A333 19:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - A333 checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- --Peroxwhy2gen 08:46, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Peroxwhy2gen checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
EdBever 08:57, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - EdBever checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Red 81 10:41, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Red 81 checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Lampak 11:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Lampak checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- I think we have to help small projects, because they can’t help themselves and vandals can very easily at the beginning of their ‘life’. Tajniak2 14:31, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Tajniak2 checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Taketa 15:12, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Taketa checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- Beany 23:49, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Beany checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- MBisanz talk 01:31, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - MBisanz checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Robotje 09:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Robotje checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Mhaesen 11:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Mhaesen checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- Good idea! Aku506 12:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Aku506 checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Erik1980 13:57, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Erik1980 checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Herr Kriss 18:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Herr Kriss checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
m:Mark W (Mwpnl) ¦ talk 19:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Mwpnl (Mark W) checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- ken123 19:26, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - ken123 checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Ency 19:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC) pl why not
Eligible - Ency checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- EMeczKa 20:02, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - EMeczKa checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Merdis 20:05, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Merdis checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Aotearoa 20:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Aotearoa checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Trivelt 21:14, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Trivelt checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- Willking1979 01:50, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Willking1979 checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
RubiksMaster110 04:08, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - RubiksMaster110 checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
Angela 04:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Angela checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
- Phantomsteve 15:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Phantomsteve checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
--The Evil IP address 22:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - The Evil IP address checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
- Annotations of which voters are affected ends here currently; please help add more.
- Logan Talk Contributions 02:17, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Logan checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
- – Innv | d | s: 02:39, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Innv checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
- Karol007 ✉ 02:53, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Karol007 checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
- -- Avi 04:09, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Avraham (Avi) checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
- - miya 06:02, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - miya checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
- --Bsadowski1 06:12, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Bsadowski1 checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
- -- Razorflame 06:18, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Razorflame checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
- Gdarin | talk 10:21, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Gdarin checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
- Cycn 11:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Cycn checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
- --Kaganer 13:26, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Kaganer checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
- Diegusjaimes 14:58, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Diegusjaimes checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
- --Jan eissfeldt 17:38, 6 January 2010 (UTC) of course
Eligible - Jan eissfeldt checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
User:8BitHero 20:45, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Thunderhead 21:51, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Thunderhead checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
94.224.94.149 23:26, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Not eligible IP can't vote; log in required - 94.224.94.149 checked by (RT) 04:13, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
- Kafziel 01:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Kafziel checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- --Taichi - (あ!) 01:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Taichi checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Frank 01:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Frank checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- NativeForeigner 01:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - NativeForeigner checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Valicore 01:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Odehammar 01:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC) The stewards must need help, as this proposition has been made. Granting more users stewardship is complicated, as they are already too few. Ergo, this proposition seems to be a solution, at least for now.- Jeffwang16 01:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Addihockey10 01:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Addihockey10 checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Stinging Swarm 01:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Emrahertr 01:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Emrahertr checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Geni 01:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Geni checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- ZooPro 01:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - ZooPro checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Bradybd 01:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Bradybd checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Please, this will be helpful. Ceranthor 01:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible Meets eligibility criteria; no unified login, but link provided - Ceranthor checked by (RT) 22:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC).
Andrew Petersen 17:54, 6 January 2010 (PST) Alright, then!
- Guettarda 01:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support I see no reason why not, as along as the right people are chosen for the role. Argyle 4 Life 02:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Argyle 4 Life checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
—§ stay (sic)! 02:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Note Rechecked. No unified login (see here) - link on user page is needed to verify eligibility to vote - Snake311 checked by (RT) 02:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
Not eligible Links between wiki accounts are unproven, so cannot verify eligibility to vote - a unified account or a link from Meta user page was required for identification - Snake311 checked by (RT) 17:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC).
- Syohei.A(talk) 02:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Araisyohei (Syohei.A) checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Blodance 02:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Blodance checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Saebjorn 02:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Saebjorn checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Sander Fraga 02:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Sander Fraga checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Ryan Postlethwaite 02:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Ryan Postlethwaite checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- oscar 02:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Oscar checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- DrNegative 02:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - DrNegative checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Maxima m 02:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Maxima m checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Evalowyn 02:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Evalowyn checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Mind the gap 02:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Ktr101 (Kevin Rutherford) checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- On en-wiki we have many admins that can quickly respond to problems. There are not nearly as many admins on other projects and there is huge potential for pressing matters to get incredibly backlogged. Having global admins will help alleviate this problem. Valley2city‽ 02:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Valley2city checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Even the little projects should have people looking out for them. AP1787 02:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - AP1787 checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Tarheel95 02:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Tarheel95 checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- As primarily an en user, and the only other language I understand is Malay, it is unlikely I will ever be involved in a project needing global sysops, but it sounds like it will be a good idea for those that need it Nil Einne 02:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Nil Einne checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Editor182 13:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Editor182 checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
OurDigitalVision Please be more responsible
- I don't see why not. Bloodmerchant 03:01, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Bloodmerchant checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Yes, but there is potential for serious misunderstandings caused by language issues Thparkth 03:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Thparkth checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Yes Mimar77 03:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Darkbluesun 03:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC) As wiki gets bigger, this could be the answer to make sure the information stays accurate and clean. On the other hand, this move could seriously slow progress couldn't it? I'll have to trust the stewards. They do a lot of the dirty work.
- billinghurst 03:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Absolutely.
Eligible - Billinghurst checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Carl 03:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible Meets eligibility criteria; no unified login, but link provided - Radiocrazy (Carl) checked by (RT) 22:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC).
- --Taweetham 03:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Taweetham checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Commander Keane 03:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Commander Keane checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
This has tremendous potential to improve the capacity of smaller projects, and to encourage a sort of broad-based community. I look forward to seeing how this will operate Steve Joseph 03:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Perey 03:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Makes perfect sense to me. Clearly the stewards need the help, or else this would have been a non-proposal.
Eligible - Perey checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- This change is long overdue, as experience with chr wikipedia demonstrated a few years ago. Wikiacc (§) 03:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. Teinesavaii 03:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Teinesavaii checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Zwilson14 03:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Zwilson14 checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Shooter16101 03:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Shooter16101 checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Yes. --The New Mikemoral 03:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - The New Mikemoral checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- DerAndre 04:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support Shivashree 04:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Shivashree checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support Calebrw 04:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Calebrw checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Yes, --Sarumo74 04:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC).
Eligible - Sarumo74 checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Mr. Anon515 04:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- --Bellayet 04:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Bellayet checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- --Atu 04:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Atu checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support As long as it's not abused, it's a good idea. For.--Maximz2005 04:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Maximz2005 checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Yk Yk Yk 04:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Yk Yk Yk checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Yes. Magnefl 04:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Magnefl checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
--Fischy 04:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Terence 05:01, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Note Rechecked. No unified login (see here) - link on user page is needed to verify eligibility to vote - Terence checked by (RT) 02:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
Not eligible Links between wiki accounts are unproven, so cannot verify eligibility to vote - a unified account or a link from Meta user page was required for identification - Terence checked by (RT) 17:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC).
- Yes. Logical proposal providing necessary help. Ezratrumpet 05:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Ezratrumpet checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Juan Miguel 05:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Juan Miguel checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- --J Hazard 05:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - J Hazard checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- If help is needed then we should help Chaosdruid 05:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Chaosdruid checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Yes. We need a way to quickly stop vandalism. Eric Scubeesnax 05:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Note Rechecked. No unified login (see here) - link on user page is needed to verify eligibility to vote - Scubeesnax checked by (RT) 02:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
Not eligible Links between wiki accounts are unproven, so cannot verify eligibility to vote - a unified account or a link from Meta user page was required for identification - Scubeesnax checked by (RT) 17:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC).
- Yes. Seablade 05:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Note Rechecked. No unified login (see here) - link on user page is needed to verify eligibility to vote - Seablade checked by (RT) 02:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
Jamesjiao 05:34, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Jamesjiao checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support Yes Noraft 05:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- User ineligible
(registered after October 1st 2009) Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months (see here and also here) - Noraft checked by (RT) 12:49, 14 February 2010 (UTC).
- User ineligible
- Alvaro qc 05:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Alvaro qc checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support Yes --Delivi 05:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Delivi checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Because the projects are allowed to opt-out. -- kh80 05:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Kh80 checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support. It is very good idea. Mondalor 05:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Mondalor checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Geanixx 05:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Geanixx checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support I think it goes without saying that Global sysops should be chosen very carefully from a pool of multi-lingual users with considerable experience in several different wiki's. Considering the brutal scrutiny local sysops candidates undergo, I don't think quality control and carefree sysopsing on a global scale is a concern. Angrysockhop 06:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Angrysockhop checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support IlyaHaykinson 06:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - IlyaHaykinson checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support Aldo samulo 06:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Aldo samulo checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Nixón 06:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Nixón checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support The wikis that are this small need the extra help, and as long as the Global sysops are picked carefully, I think that the idea is an excellent way to make sure they get that help. Trinity507 06:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Trinity507 checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support IVP 06:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - IVP checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support --84.60.37.89 06:34, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 06:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Nat checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support --Labant 06:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Sadly you are [ineligible to vote because you registered on October 4th 2009 (the requirement is October 1st) If you have an old account that is eligible to vote please feel free to use that and your opinion is of course still welcome and you can join in on the discussions. James (T|C) 03:45, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Eligible Rechecked and reinstated. At the time of voting Labant had been registered for 3 months on de wikipedia and had sufficient edits, meeting the eligibility criteria set out at the head of this page (see here) - Labant checked by (RT) 19:11, 15 February 2010 (UTC).
- Kv75 06:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Kv75 checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support'd. perhaps wikis on external sites elect to be included in this list, if they feel that they would be better off with the aid of these obviously-very-qualified editors. I assume wikis about specific topics are not under Wikimedia's administration, but if they are being overrun with vandals or have administrators fighting, these sites could issue a metaphorical call for help through whatever medium we set up. The next version of the wiki software could include a tag of whether or not to allow these people power, and they (the external wikis) could add themselves to the privilege list. Sompm 06:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support--Shizhao 06:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Shizhao checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- --Heiko 06:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Heiko checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- Hohohob 07:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Hohohob checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support - Wysprgr2005 07:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Wysprgr2005 checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- --Djlordi 07:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Djlordi checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Supportמתניה 07:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - מתניה checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support Dovi 07:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Dovi checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support --Caponer 07:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Caponer checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support CaribDigita 07:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC) I read through many of the "No"s and I believe Global sysops might be able to guide new upstart projects in the right direction until they get more established. As it was stated, if it just simply deleted because it is small, then nothing new will ever obtain the chance to become firmly established.
Support Kimchi.sg 08:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Kimchi.sg checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support - seems like a good idea--Pianoplonkers 08:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Pianoplonkers checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support CntRational 08:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Sure.
Support --Petri 08:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Support - if a project still has the right to decide if global sysops should have admin rights in their project, then yes. Cavernia 08:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Great idea! —what a crazy random happenstance 08:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Happenstance checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- --DS-fax 08:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Hat600 (DS-fax) checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support +1 I think that this would avoid SURP and other cross wikis problems. --Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 08:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Tyw7 checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support Merlissimo 08:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Merlissimo checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support In the early stage of the project, someone who don't know project's language may get admin right for maintenance. After the project grow enough, that admin right might be questioned by newcomers, as they don't have neither consensus nor RfA. Global sysop can avoid those situation, I think. If it was mandatory for all project, I might say No. --Peremen 08:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Peremen checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support Kenrick95 08:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Kenrick95 checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support --Wvk 08:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Wvk checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
- --Treublatt 08:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Treublatt checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support VMS Mosaic 08:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - VMS Mosaic checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support --Lutz Terheyden 08:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Lutz Terheyden checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support --Faizhaider 08:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Faizhaider checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support, I like this idea. --Mercy 09:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Mercy checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support --Ragimiri 09:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Ragimiri checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support good idea for small projects --Tlusťa 09:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Tlusťa checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support Reduction of Steward - workload by distributing "simple" admin tasks on adminless wikis. --Guandalug 09:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Eligible - Guandalug checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
Support While I have grave reservations about adding in extra levels of hierarchy (K.I.S.S.), after carefully reading through this I can see the point of it so I support it. Mathmo 09:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)