Meta

Global sysops/Vote

< Global sysops
The following discussion is closed: This proposal passes, but without the "Global blocks" related rights.

This proposal's raw rating is : 1385 / 1802 (76.9%).

One of the main points of concern about this proposal is the ability of global sysop to globally block accounts. (supports 39, 209, 422, 520 / opposes 5, 6, 13, 25, 50, 67, 77, 82, 89, 102, 148, 171, 180, 187, 217, 231, 242, 248, 252, 327, 331, 349, 387 ; plus all the people that voted "as per" them)

The proposal should have been closed a whole month ago. The most viable compromise seems allow the proposal while removing this litigious bit.

so.

The Global Sysop proposal is accepted, with the following rights removed from its original formulation :

  • Bypass global blocks (globalblock-exempt)
  • Disable global blocks locally (globalblock-whitelist)
  • Make global blocks (globalblock)
  • Remove global blocks (globalunblock)

DarkoNeko 04:11, 1 March 2010 (UTC)


The global sysops vote is over.


Global sysops (Vote)
العربية:

(ساعدنا في ترجمة هذه الرسالة)

جميع أعضاء مجتمعات ويكيميديا والذين يحققون المعايير التالية مدعوون للتصويت على مقترح المشرفين العامين:
  • لدية أكثر من 150 إضافة في مشروع واحد على الأقل
  • قد قام بالتسجيل قبل أكثر من ثلاثة أشهر على الأقل
وسيستمر التصويت من الساعة 00:00 1 يناير 2010 (ت.ع.م) حتى 23:59 31 يناير 2010 (ت.ع.م), وبعد وقت محدد سيتم استعراض النتائج وتطبيقها.
مصرى:

( ساعدنا فى ترجمة الرساله دى)
مشروع فكرة السيسوب العام "Global Sysops". هنا]

و تم فتح التصويت على الفكره و ينتهى التصويت فى 31 يناير.

جميع أعضاء مجتمعات ويكيميديا و اللى يحققون الشروط دى مدعوين للتصويت على مقترح السيسوب العام:
  • يكون ليك حساب مسجل
  • يكون ليك 150 تعديل فى مشروع ويكيبيديا واحد على الأقل
  • يكون مر على تاريخ تسجيلك تلات شهور على الأقل
و هايستمر التصويت من الساعة 00:00 1 يناير 2010 (ت.ع.م) حتى 23:59 31 يناير 2010 (ت.ع.م), وبعد وقت محدد هاتتعرض نتايج التصويت و تتطبق.
Беларуская:

(дапамажыце перакласьці гэтае паведамленьне)

Усе сябры супольнасьці Wikimedia, якія адпавядаюць наступным крытэрам, запрашаюцца да галасаваньня наконт кандыдатаў у глябальныя адміністратары:
  • 150 правак прынамсі ў адным з праектаў
  • 3 месяцы з даты рэгістрацыі
Галасаваньне трывае з 00:00 1 студзеня 2010 (UTC) да 23:59 31 студзеня 2010 (UTC), пасьля чаго будуць прынятыя і абвешчаныя вынікі.
Български:

(помогнете ни да преведем това съобщение)

Всички членове на обществото Уикимедия, които отговарят на следните критерии, са поканени да гласуват в предложението за глобални сис-опове:
  • Трябва да имат регистриран акаунт (регистрация)
  • 150 редакции върху поне един проект
  • Поне 3 месеца регистрация
Вотът ще тече от 00:00, 1 Януари 2010 (UTC) до 23:59, 31 Януари 2010 (UTC), след което ще се проведе безпристрастен очерк и резултатите от вота ще влязат в сила.
Bosanski:

(Pomozite nam sa prevodom ove poruke!)

Svi članovi Wikimedija zajednice, koji ispunjavaju navedene kriterije, su pozvani da daju svoj glas na glasanju o uvođenju grupe globalnih administratora:
  • 150 izmjena na najmanje jednom projektu
  • najmanje 3 mjeseca prijavljen
Glasanje traje od 1. januara 2010. u 00:00 sati (UTC) do 31. januara 2010. u 23:59 sati (UTC). Poslije glasanja, rezultate će objaviti jedna neutralna osoba.
Català :

(ajudeu a traduir aquest missatge)

Tots els membres de la comunitat de Wikimedia que compleixin tots els criteris que segueixen a continuació estan invitats a votar la proposta sobre administradors globals:
  • Estar registrat
  • Haver fet 150 edicions en almenys un projecte
  • Haver-se registrat fa més de 3 mesos
La votació tindrà lloc des de les 00:00 de l'1 de gener de 2010 (UTC) fins les 23:59 del 31 de gener del 2010 (UTC), i serà seguida d'una revisió independent per a determinar el resultat.
کوردی:

( هاوکاریمان بکە لە وەرگێڕانی ئەم پەیامەدا)

هەموو ئەندامێکی دامەزراوەی ویکیمیدیا کە ئەم مەرجانەی خوارەوەی تێدابێت، بانگهێشتکراوە بۆ دەنگدان لەسەر ئەم پرۆژەئامادەکراوە global sysops :
  • پێویستە هەژمارێکی خۆی هەبێت
  • لانی کەم لەیەکێک لە پرۆژەکانی ویکیمیدیادا ١٥٠ بەشداری هەبێت
  • ٣ مانگ تێپەڕیبیت بەسەر ئەندامەتییەکەیدا
ئەم دەنگدانە لە ڕێکەوتی ١.١.٢٠١٠ - کاتژمێر ٠٠:٠٠ بەکاتی گشتی بەردەوامە تاکوو ٣١.١.٢٠١٠ کاتژمێر ١٢:٠٠ شەو بەکاتی گشتی، پاش کۆتایی دەنگدان کەسێکی سەربەخۆ دەنگەکان دەژمێرێت و ئەنجامەکەی ئاشکرا دەکات.
Čeština:

(help us translate this message)

Všichni členové komunity Wikimedia, kteří splňují následující kritéria, jsou zváni k hlasování o zavedení uživatelské skupiny globální správci:
  • Uživatel musí být registrovaný
  • Musí být registrovaný 3 měsíce a déle
  • Na jednom z projektů Wikimedia musí mít 150 editací a více
Volby startují 1. ledna v 00:00 (UTC) a budou trvat do 31. ledna do 23:59 (UTC), poté proběhne nezávislé vyhodnocení a výsledky vejdou v platnost.
Dansk:

(Hjælp os med at oversætte denne besked)

Alle medlemmer af Wikimedia-fællesskabet, som opfylder de følgende kriterier er inviteret til at stemme om forslaget globale administratorer:
  • Skal have en registreret konto
  • 150 redigeringer på mindst et projekt
  • 3 måneders registrering
Afstemningen vil blive afviklet fra kl. 00:00, den 1. januar 2010 (UTC) indtil kl. 23:59, den 31. januar 2010 (UTC), hvorefter en upartisk gennemgang udføres, som vedtager resultaterne.
Deutsch:

(Hilf uns bei der Übersetzung dieser Nachricht!)

Alle Mitglieder der Wikimedia-Gemeinschaft, die folgende Kriterien erfüllen, sind eingeladen, an der Abstimmung zur Einführung der Benutzergruppe globaler Administrator teilzunehmen:
  • 150 Edits in mindestens einem Projekt
  • mindestens 3 Monate registriert
Die Abstimmung läuft vom 1. Januar 2010 um 00:00 Uhr (UTC) bis zum 31. Januar 2010 um 23:59 Uhr (UTC). Nach der Abstimmung wird von einer neutralen Person das Ergebnis bekannt gegeben.
Dolnoserbski:

(Pomagaj nam toś tu powěźeńku pśedłožyś)

Wše cłonki Wikimedijowego zgromaźeństwa, kótarež docynjaju wšykne slědujuce kriterije su pśepšosone na wótgłosowanje wó naraźenju ku globalnym administratoram:
  • Musyš měś zregistrěrowane konto wót 3 mjasecow
  • 150 změnow na nanejmjenjej jadnem projekśe
Wótgłoswanje běžy wót 1. januara 2010 00:00 goź. (UTC) do 31.januara 2010 23:59 goź. (UTC). Pótom neutralny wužywaŕ pśeglědajo a dajo wuslědki k wěsći.
Ελληνικά:

(βοηθήστε μας να μεταφράσουμε αυτό το μήνυμα)

Όλα τα μέλη της κοινότητας του Wikimedia που καλύπτουν τα ακόλουθα κριτήρια προσκαλούνται να ψηφίσουν την πρόταση για global sysops:
  • 150 επεξεργασίες σε τουλάχιστον ένα εγχείρημα
  • 3 μήνες εγγεγραμμένος
Η ψηφοφορία θα διαρκέσει από 00:00, 1 Ιανουάριος 2010 (UTC) έως 23:59, 31 Ιανουάριος 2010 (UTC), μετά την οποία θα γίνει μια μη-φατριαστική αποτίμηση και θα ανακοινωθούν τα αποτελέσματα.
English:

(help us translate this message)

All members of the Wikimedia community who meet all of the following criteria are invited to vote on the global sysops proposal:
  • Must have had a registered account for at least 3 months
  • 150 edits on at least one project
The vote will run from 00:00, 1 January 2010 (UTC) to 23:59, 31 January 2010 (UTC), after which time a non-partisan review will be undertaken and the results enacted.
Esperanto:

(Helpo pri la traduko de tiu noto!)

Ĉiuj membroj de la vikimedia komunumo, kiuj plenumas la sekvajn kriteriojn, invitiĝas partopreni en baloto pri la enkonduko de la vikipediista rajto globala administranto:
  • 150 redaktoj en almenaŭ unu projekto
  • registriĝo ekde almenaŭ 3 monatoj
La baloto daŭras de la 1-a de januaro 2010 00:00 h (UTC) ĝis la 31-a de januaro 2010 23:59 h (UTC). Post la baloto la rezulto anonciĝos fare de neŭtrala persono.
Español :

(ayúdenos con la traducción de este mensaje)

Todos los miembros de la comunidad Wikimedia que cumplan los siguientes requisitos están invitados a votar en la propuesta de administradores globales:
  • Tener una cuenta registrada
  • 150 ediciones en al menos un proyecto
  • 3 meses de antigüedad de registro
La votación comenzará el día 1 de enero de 2010 a las 00:00 horas (UTC) y finalizará el día 31 de enero de 2010 a las 23:59 horas (UTC), a partir de ese momento comenzará un estudio independiente de los votos para determinar el resultado.
Euskara:

(Lagun gaitzazu mezu honen itzulpenarekin)

Ondorengo baldintzak betetzen dituzten Wikimedia komunitateko kide guztiak gonbidatuak daude administratzaile globalen inguruko bozketara:
  • Gutxienez 150 aldaketa proiektu batean
  • 3 hilabete baino denbora gehiago izatea proiektuan
Bozketa 2010 urtarrilaren 1eko 00:00etan (UTC) hasiko da eta 2010eko urtarrilaren 31eko 23:59etan (UTC) amaituko dam une horretatik aurrera bozken ikaste independentea egingo emaitza determinatzeko.
فارسی:

(به ما در ترجمه این متن کمک کنید)
از تمامی اعضای انجمن ویکی‌مدیا که دارای شرایط زیر هستند دعوت می‌شود تا در رای گیری برای طرح پیشنهادی: راهبرسراسری سیستم شرکت کنند:

  • کاربر تایید شده باشد
  • حداقل 150 ویرایش در یکی از پروژه‌ها داشته باشد
  • 3 ماه از زمان ثبت نام او گذشته باشد
رای‌گیری از یکم ژانویه 2010 ساعت 00:00 آغاز خواهد شد و در 31 ژانویه 2010 ساعت 23:59 به پایان خواهد رسید.نظر سنجی‌هایی که پس از پایان زمان مقرر ثبت شوند بی تاثیر خواهند بود.
Suomi:

(auta meitä kääntämään tämä viesti)

Kaikki seuraavat kriteerit täyttävät Wikimedia-yhteisön jäsenet kutsutaan äänestämään globaaleja ylläpitäjiä koskevasta ehdotuksesta:
  • ainakin 150 muokkausta vähintään yhdessä hankkeessa
  • tunnuksen rekisteröimisestä kulunut vähintään 3 kuukautta
Äänestys pidetään 1. tammikuuta 2010 kello 00:00 (UTC) – 31. tammikuuta 2010 kello 23:59 (UTC), minkä jälkeen suoritetaan puolueeton äänestyksen arviointi ja tulokset pannaan täytäntöön.
Français :

(Aidez nous a traduire ce message)

Tous les membres de la communauté Wikimedia ayant atteint les critères suivants sont invités à voter sur la proposition des administrateurs globaux :
  • 150 modifications sur un projet
  • Enregistré depuis plus de 3 mois
Le vote est ouvert du 1 janvier 2010 00:00 (UTC) au 31 janvier 2010 23:59 (UTC), après un décompte impartial sera effectué, et les résultats annoncés.
Frysk:

(Help ús dit berjocht oer te setten)

Eltsenien yn de Wikimedia-mienskip dy't foldocht oan de folgjende easken wurdt útnoege om te stimmen oer it foarstel foar globale behearders:
  • Jo moatte in brûkersnamme hawwe,
  • dêrmei op syn minst 150 bewurkingen op op syn minst ien projekt dien hawwe,
  • en trije moanne as dy brûker registrearre wêze.
De stimming rint fan 1 jannewaris 2010 01:00 (CET) oant 31 jannewaris 2010 00:59 (CET), wêrnei't de risseltaten ûnpartidich beskôge en útfurdige wurde sille.
Galego:

(axúdanos a traducir esta mensaxe)

Todos os membros da comunidade da Wikimedia que reúnan os seguintes requirimentos están convidados a participar na votación de administradores globais:
  • 150 edicións en, polo menos, un proxecto
  • Rexistro desde hai, polo menos, 3 meses
A votación irá desde as 00:00 do 1 de xaneiro de 2010 (UTC) ata as 23:59 do 31 de xaneiro de 2010 (UTC); despois, farase un escrutinio imparcial e publicaranse os resultados.
Alemannisch :

(Hilf is bi dr Ibersetzig vu däre Nochricht!)

Alli Mitglider vu dr Wikimedia-Gmeinschaft, wu die Kriterie erfille, sin yyglade, mitzmache an dr Abstimmig fir d Yyfierig vu dr Benutzergruppe globale Ammann:
  • 150 Edit in zmindescht eim Projäkt
  • zmindescht 3 Monate regischtriert
D Abstimmig lauft vum 1. Jänner 2010 am 00:00 Uhr (UTC) bis zum 31. Jänner 2010 am 23:59 Uhr (UTC). No dr Abstimmig wird vun ere neutrale Person s Ergebnis bekannt gee.
עברית:

(סייעו לנו לתרגם הודעה זו)

כל חברי קהילת ויקימדיה אשר עומדים בקריטריונים להלן מוזמנים להצביע על ההצעה למנות מפעילי מערכת גלובליים:
  • בעלי חשבון משתמש
  • לפחות 150 עריכות באחד המיזמים
  • בעלי ותק של שלושה חודשים כמשתמשים רשומים
ההצבעה תימשך מ-00:00, 1 בינואר 2010 (UTC) עד 23:59, 31 בינואר 2010 (UTC), אז תבוצע הערכה של התוצאות וההחלטה תיכנס לתוקף.
Hrvatski:

(Pomozite nam prevesti ovu poruku!)

Pozivaju se svi članovi zajednice Wikimedija koji udovoljavaju idućim kriterijima neka glasuju o prijedlogu uvođenja globalnih administratora:
  • 150 uređivanja na najmanje jednom projektu
  • najmanje 3 mjeseca prijavljeni
Glasovanje traje od 1. siječnja 2010. u 00:00 (UTC) do 31. siječnja 2010. u 23:59 (UTC). Nakon glasovanja neutralna osoba pregledat će glasove da bi se utvrdio konačni rezultat glasovanja.
Hornjoserbsce:

(Pomhaj nam tutu zdźělenku předłožić)

Wšitcy čłonojo Wikimedijoweho zhromadźenstwa, kotřiž spjelnjeja slědowace kriterije, su přeprošene na wothłosowanje wo namjeće ke globalnym administratoram:
  • Dyrbiš zregistrowane konto wot 3 měsacow měć
  • 150 změnow na znajmjeńša jadnym projekće
Wóthłoswanje běži wot 1. januara 2010 00:00 hodź. (UTC) do 31.januara 2010 23:59 hodź. (UTC). Potom neutralny wužiwar budźe wuslědki přepruwować a wozjewjeć.
Magyar:

(Kérjük, segíts más nyelvekre is lefordítani ezt a szöveget!)

Ez a szavazás a globális adminisztrátori jogosultság bevezetése felől hivatott dönteni. Minden szerkesztő – legyen az bármely Wikimédia társoldalról való – jogosult szavazni, ha:
  • van felhasználói fiókja, és
  • ehhez kapcsolódóan legalább 150 szerkesztése legalább 1 társoldalon, és
  • a regisztrációja 3 hónapnál régebbi.
A szavazás kezdete: 2010. január 1. 0:00; vége: 2010. január 31. 23:59. Az összesítést független (a szavazáson részt nem vett) szerkesztők végzik majd.
Interlingua:

(adjuta nos a traducer iste message)

Tote le membros del communitate Wikimedia que satisface tote le sequente criterios es invitate a votar super le proposition de administratores global:
  • Debe posseder un conto registrate
  • 150 modificationes in al minus un projecto
  • 3 menses de registration
Le voto essera aperte de 00:00, le 1 de januario 2010 (UTC) a 23:59, le 31 de januario 2010 (UTC). Postea un revision impartial essera interprendite e le resultatos promulgate.
Bahasa Indonesia:
Semua anggota komunitas Wikimedia yang memenuhi syarat berikut diundang untuk memberikan suara di proposal global sysops:
  • Telah membuat 150 suntingan setidaknya pada satu proyek, dan
  • Telah terdaftar minimal 3 (tiga) bulan.
Pemungutan suara akan dilaksanakan dari pukul 00.00, 1 Januari 2010 (UTC) hingga pukul 23.59, 31 Januari 2010 (UTC). Setelah 31 Januari tersebut, semua orang ternasuk yang tidak berhak suara, dapat melihat hasil akhir pemungutan. Hasil tersebut dapat dipertangungjawabkan dan akan ditetapkan.
Italiano:

(aiutarci a tradurre questo messaggio)

Tutti i membri della comunità di Wikimedia che soddisfano i criteri seguenti sono invitati a votare la proposta per gli amministratori globali:
  • 150 modifiche su almeno un progetto
  • 3 mesi di registrazione
La votazione si svolgerà dalle 00:00 del 1 gennaio 2010 (UTC) alle ore 23:59 del 31 gennaio 2010 (UTC), dopo di che sarà presa una decisione imparziale e il risultato verrà messo in atto.
日本語：

(このメッセージの翻訳を手伝ってください)

以下の基準を満たすウィキメディア利用者は、グローバル管理者の提案についての投票に参加してください:
  • ログインユーザーであること
  • 少なくとも一つのプロジェクトにおいて150編集以上
  • アカウント登録後、3か月以上
投票は、2010年1月1日00:00(UTC)から2010年1月31日23:59(UTC)まで行われます。投票終了後、無党派（non-partisan）による投票チェックが行われ、結果が確定します。
ភាសាខ្មែរ៖

(សូមជួយបកប្រែសារនេះ)

សមាជិកគ្រប់រូបរបស់សហគមន៍វិគីមេឌាដែលបំពេញលក្ខខណ្ឌខាងក្រោមត្រូបានអញ្ជើញអោយចូលរួមបោះឆ្នោតនៅក្នុងសំនើសេវាភិបាលសកល៖
  • អ្នកត្រូវតែមានគណនីចុះឈ្មោះរួចរាល់ហើយយ៉ាងតិច៣ខែ
  • មានកំណែប្រែយ៉ាងតិច១៥០នៅលើគម្រោងមួយ
ការបោះឆ្នោតនឹងប្រព្រឹត្តទៅចាប់ពីម៉ោង ០០:០០ ថ្ងៃទី១ មករា ២០១០ (UTC) ដល់ម៉ោង ២៣:៥៩ ថ្ងៃទី៣១ មករា ២០១០ (UTC)។ បន្ទាប់ពីនោះបុគ្គលកអព្យាក្រិតនឹងធ្វើការត្រួតពិនិត្យរាប់សំលេងឆ្នោតនិងប្រកាសលទ្ធផល។
한국어:

(번역을 도와주세요!)

다음 조건을 만족하는 위키미디어 프로젝트의 모든 참여자들은 글로벌 관리자의 도입 제안에 대한 투표에 참여할 수 있습니다.
  • 적어도 1개의 프로젝트에서 편집 횟수가 150회 이상
  • 계정 등록 이후 3개월이 지나야 함
이 투표는 2010년 1월 1일 00:00 (UTC)에서 2010년 1월 31일 23:59 (UTC)까지 열립니다. 그 후에 적절한 의견을 종합하여 결과를 발표할 것입니다.
Македонски:

(помогнете ни да ја преведеме оваа порака)

Сите членови на заедницата на Викимедија кои ги задоволуваат сите долунаведени критериуми се повикуваат да гласаат по предлогот за глобални администратори:
  • Регистрирана сметка веќе 3 месеци
  • 150 уредувања на барем еден проект
Гласањето ќе трае од 00:00, 1 јануари 2010 (UTC) до 23:59, 31 јануари 2010 (UTC). Потоа ќе се изврши независен преглед и пребројување, и резултатите ќе бидат објавени.
Bahasa Melayu:

(Bantu kami menterjemah pesanan ini)

Semua ahli komuniti Wikimedia yang memenuhi semua kriteria berikut dijemput untuk mengundi cadangan penyelia sejagat:
  • Mempunyai akaun berdaftar
  • 150 suntingan di satu projek
  • 3 bulan berdaftar
Undian bermula pada 00:00, 1 Januari 2010 (UTC) hingga 23:59, 31 Januari 2010 (UTC). Selepas itu kajian tak berpihak akan diadakan dan keputusannya dijalankan.
Nederlands:

(Help vertalen)

Alle gebruikers van Wikimedia projecten worden uitgenodigd te stemmen over het voorstel voor globale moderatoren, mits men voldoet aan:
  • minimaal 150 bewerkingen op minimaal één project
  • minimaal 3 maanden voor aanvang van de stemming geregistreerd
De stemming is open van 1 januari 2010 1:00 (CET) tot 31 januari 2010 0:59 (CET), daarna zal de uitslag door een neutraal persoon bekend worden gemaakt.
Occitan :

(Ajudatz-nos a traduire aqueste messatge)

Totes los membres de la comunautat Wikimedia qu'an atench los critèris seguents son convidats a votar per la proposicion dels administrators globals
  • 150 modificacions sus un projècte
  • Enregistrat dempuèi mai de 3 meses
Lo vòte comença a 00:00 lo 1èr de genièr de 2010 (UTC) fins a 23:59 lo 31 de genièr de 2010 (UTC), aprèp lo quel un contraròtle sera efectuat e los resultats anonciats.
Kapampangan:

(saupan yu kami king pamaglikas ning kapabaluan a ini)

Deng anggang kayanib ning comunidad a Wikimedia community a makibat kareng makatuking condicion o kapaliarian, agkatan lang magbotu king munikala dikil kareng global sysops:
  • Kailangan, atin lang makarehistrung account
  • 150 edit king e kukulang king metung a proyectu
  • 3 bulan a makarehistru
Maliari ing pamagbotu manibat 00:00, 1 Enero 2010 (UTC) anggang 23:59, 31 Enero 2010 (UTC), at kaibat na niti, marapat ing metung a pamaniuring alang kakabiran (non-partisan review), at papaliari do reng resulta.
Polski:

(pomóż nam przetłumaczyć ten komunikat)

Wszyscy członkowie społeczności Wikimedia, którzy spełniają poniższe kryteria, są uprawnieni do głosowania nad propozycją utworzenia uprawnienia globalnego administratora:
  • wykonało się co najmniej 150 edycji w jednym z projektów
  • posiada się konto zarejestrowane co najmniej 3 miesiące temu
Głosowanie rozpoczyna się 1 stycznia 2010 o godzinie 00:00 (UTC), a zakończy 31 stycznia 2010 o godzinie 23:59 (UTC). Po tym czasie niezależna osoba sprawdzi poprawność głosowania i zatwierdzi wyniki.
Português :

(ajude-nos a traduzir esta mensagem)

Todos os membros da comunidade Wikimedia que cumpram os seguintes requisitos estão convidados a votar na proposta de administradores globais:
  • 150 edições em pelo menos um projeto
  • 3 meses de registro
A votação começará às 00:00, 1º de Janeiro de 2010 (UTC) e terminará às 23:59, 31 de Janeiro de 2010 (UTC); a partir desse momento começará um estudo independente dos votos para determinar o resultado.
Русский:

(помогите нам перевести это сообщение)

Все участники сообщества Викимедиа, соответствующие нижеприведённым критериям, приглашаются к участию в голосовании по предложению о глобальных администраторах:
  • 150 правок хотя бы в одном из проектов
  • 3 месяца с момента регистрации
Голосование начнётся 1 января 2010 в 00:00 и будет длиться до 23:59 31 января 2010 года (UTC), после чего будут подведены независимые итоги и оглашены результаты.
Slovenčina:

(pomôžte nám preložiť túto správu)

Všetci členovia komunity Wikimedia, ktorý spĺňajú nasledujúce kritéria sú pozvaný voliť na návrh globálnych administrátorov:
  • Mať registrovaný účet
  • 150 úprav na minimálne jednom projekte
  • 3 mesiace od založenia účtu
Volenie bude prebiehať od 00:00, 1. januára 2010 (UTC) do 23:59, 31. januára 2010 (UTC), po ktorom bude nasledovať neutrálny posudok a výsledky budú prijaté.
Српски / srpski:

(Помозите нам са преводом ове поруке!)

Сви чланови Викимедија заједнице, који испуњавају наведене критеријуме, су позвани да дају свој глас на гласању о увођењу групе глобалних администратора:
  • 150 измена на бар једном пројекту
  • најмање 3 месеца пријављени
Гласање траје од 1. јануара 2010. у 00:00 сати (UTC) до 31. јануара 2010. у 23:59 сати (UTC). После гласања, резултате ће објавити једна неутрална особа.
Svenska:

(Hjälp oss översätta detta meddelande)

Alla medlemmar i Wikimedia-gemenskapen som uppfyller följande kriterier uppmanas att rösta om förslaget globala administratörer:
  • 150 redigeringar på minst ett projekt
  • 3 månaders registrering
Omröstningen kommer att pågå från 00:00, 1 januari 2010 (UTC) till 23:59, 31 januari 2010 (UTC), varefter en opartisk översyn kommer att göras som fastställer resultatet.
ไทย:

(ช่วยเราด้วยการแปล)

สมาชิกของประชาคมวิกิมีเดียที่มีคุณสมบัติครบตามที่ปรากฎด้านล่างนี้ได้รับเชิญให้ลงคะแนนเพื่อเห็นชอบหรือคัดค้านการมีผู้ดูแลระบบสากล (Global Sysops):
  • ต้องมีชื่อบัญชีผู้ใช้ที่ลงทะเบียนแล้ว
  • มีการแก้ไขอย่างน้อย 150 ครั้งในโครงการใดๆ
  • ลงทะเบียนมาแล้วอย่างน้อย 3 เดือน
โดยการลงคะแนนจะเริ่มต้นตั้งแต่วันที่ 1 มกราคม 2010 (พ.ศ.2553) เวลา 00:00น. (ตามเวลาสากล UTC หรือ 7.00น. ตามเวลาประเทศไทย) จนถึงวันที่ 31 มกราคม 2010 (พ.ศ.2553) เวลา 23:59น. (ตามเวลาสากล UTC หรือ 6.59น. ของวันที่ 1 กุมภาพันธ์ ตามเวลาประเทศไทย) หลังจากเวลาดังกล่าว คำวิจารณ์และการลงคะแนนจะถูกรับรองและจะดำเนินการตามผลคะแนนเสียงส่วนใหญ่
Türkçe:

(bu iletiyi çevirmemize yardımcı olun)

Wikimedia Topluluğunun aşağıdaki koşulları sağlayan tüm üyeleri küresel sistem yöneticiliği önergesini oylamaya davet edilmektedir:
  • Herhangi bir projede en az 150 değişikliğe,
  • 3 aylık üyeliğe sahip olunmalı.
Oylama eşgüdümlü evrensel saate göre 1 Ocak 2010 saat 00:00'dan, 31 Ocak 2010 saat 23:59'a kadar sürecek ve ardından tarafsız bir incelemeden sonra sonuçlar yasalaştırılacaktır.
Українська:

(допоможіть перекласти це повідомлення)

Усі користувачі спільноти Wikimedia, що відповідають таким критеріям, запрошуються до голосування з приводу кандидатів у глобальні адміністратори:
  • не менше 150 редагувань в одному з проектів
  • не менше 3 місяців з дати реєстрації
Голосування триває з 00:00 1 січня 2010 (UTC) до 23:59 31 січня 2010 (UTC), після чого будуть підбиті підсумки і оголошено результат.
Tiếng Việt:

(giúp chúng tôi dịch thông báo này)

Mời tất cả các thành viên cộng đồng Wikimedia thỏa mãn các tiêu chí sau tham gia bỏ phiếu cho đề xuất bảo quản viên toàn dự án:
  • Phải mở tài khoản được ít nhất 3 tháng
  • Có 150 sửa đổi tại ít nhất một dự án
Cuộc bỏ phiếu sẽ bắt đầu từ 00:00, 1 tháng 1 năm 2010 (UTC) đến 23:59, 31 tháng 1 năm 2010 (UTC), sau đó sẽ được một người trung lập duyệt lại và thông báo kết quả.
粵語:

(幫手譯)

參加全域管理員方案投票嘅用戶須要符合下列要求︰
  • 喺至少一個計劃編輯多過一百五十次
  • 註冊超過三個月
投票期：2010年1月1號00:00（UTC）至2010年1月31號23:59（UTC），之後就會覆核選票同埋公布結果。
文言:

(助譯之)

全域有秩方案票選，凡與者，
須編典，至少一部，且纂之多於百又五十，
並增簿迄今，三月有余。
票選始於己丑年十一月十七，終於己丑年十二月十七，爾後核之而不頗，並布其果。
中文（简体）‎：

(help us translate this message)

参加全域管理员方案投票的元维基维基人需要符合下列条件:
  • 在至少一个计划，编辑次数不少于150次
  • 注册超过3个月
投票时间：2010年1月1日00:00（UTC）至2010年1月31日23:59（UTC）。之后将会作出中立的方案并颁布结果。
中文（繁體）‎:

(協助翻譯)

全域管理員方案投票參與者須符下列要求︰
  • 於至少一個計劃中編輯逾一百五十次
  • 註冊逾三個月
投票期：2010年1月1日00:00（UTC）至2010年1月31日23:59（UTC），及後會覆核選票並公布結果。

Pictogram voting support.svg Yes

Please place your vote at the bottom of the list.

  1. NuclearWarfare has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    As proposer[1] NW (Talk) 00:00, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - NuclearWarfare checked by (RT) 03:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  2. Maximillion Pegasus is a sysop on an affected wiki
    Maximillion Pegasus 00:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Maximillion Pegasus checked by (RT) 03:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  3. Barras is a sysop on an affected wiki
    Barras talk 00:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Barras checked by (RT) 03:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  4. Jamesofur has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    James (T|C) 00:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC) I think this is an important position that has long been needed to help the stewards, in the end those who get the bit need to be carefully chosen because of the sensitivity of working with small and growing communities but needed still.
    Eligible Eligible - Jamesofur checked by (RT) 03:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  5. I don't see why not.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 00:14, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Gordonrox24 checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  6. VasilievVV is a sysop on an affected wiki
    vvvt 00:14, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - VasilievVV (vvv) checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  7. J.delanoy has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    J.delanoygabsadds 00:15, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - J.delanoy checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  8. Katerenka may have contributed to kwwiki, which is an affected wiki
    ···Katerenka (討論) 00:39, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Katerenka checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  9. Lar has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Care in choosing these folk is key but this is a needed and useful thing. ++Lar: t/c 00:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Lar checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  10. delirious & lost ☯ ~hugs~ 01:34, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Deliriousandlost checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  11. WizardOfOz is a sysop on a wiki which will be affected
    --WizardOfOz 01:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - WizardOfOz checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  12. Tempodivalse is a sysop on an affected wiki
    Support Support This is a good idea. Tempodivalse [talk] 03:04, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Tempodivalse checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  13. support. There are good reasons for it; individual wikis can opt out altogether; and problems with individual global sysops can be addressed as explained. Rd232 11:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Rd232 checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Why not !!! [✖ not eligible]
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. Unsigned vote is by Jaymondy (see evidence), who is not entitled to vote (see here and also here) - Jaymody checked by (RT) 04:05, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  14. GSMR has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    GSMR 03:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - GSMR checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  15. Bart0278 has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    --Bart0278 03:11, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Bart0278 checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
    MisterWiki has contributed an English page to a wiki which will be affected
    --MisterWiki (talk) 03:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Vote actually by Fire in the Hole (see evidence) who is not eligible to vote (see here and also here). Later duplicate vote from same account - Fire in the Hole (signed as MisterWiki) checked by (RT) 01:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  16. IRTC1015 03:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - IRTC1015 checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
    I agree. --Awesong 03:25, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [✖ not eligible—VasilievVV]
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At the time of voting had not been registered for at least 3 months (see here and also here) - Awesong checked by (RT) 01:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  17. Laaknor is a sysop on a wiki which will be affected
    Help needed! Laaknor 03:26, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Laaknor checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  18. Masrudin has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Masrudin 03:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Masrudin checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
    Kwj2772 is a sysop on a wiki which will be affected
    Kwj2772 (msg) 03:48, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Info Moved vote Rechecked. See evidence here and also here - Kwj2772 checked by (RT) 01:22, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  19. --Jivee Blau 03:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jivee Blau checked by (RT) 02:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
    Yes. Wq-man 03:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [✖ not eligible—VasilievVV]
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At the time of voting had not been registered for at least 3 months (see here and also here) - Wq-man checked by (RT) 02:25, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  20. Juliancolton has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Durr. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Juliancolton checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  21. PeterSymonds 03:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - PeterSymonds checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  22. Nifky? has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Nifky? 04:24, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Nifky? checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
    Ganondolf 04:33, 1 January 2010 (UTC) [✖ not eligible]
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. Does not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here). - Ganondolf checked by (RT) 00:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  23. TRYPPN's home wiki will be affected
    YES. This facility to be provided only for 3 years. Further, after 3 years also, if no one want to become a Administrator within the Project, then it means that there is no real responsible person in the project. So, if it happens like that then the project should be closed down and no help should be provided from outside the project. --TRYPPN 04:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - TRYPPN checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  24. Mike.lifeguard has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    The proposal adequately addresses the main issues I had, and will result in large benefits for our smaller wikis. It should be implemented sooner rather than later.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 04:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Mike.lifeguard checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  25. blurpeace has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Definite necessity for our smaller projects. –blurpeace (talk) 08:33, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - blurpeace checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  26. Ejs-80 has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    All help is welcome, and any project can opt-out if the community feels that they don't need (or want) it. –Ejs-80 08:38, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Ejs-80 checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  27. A fine proposal in favor of our smaller wikis. IShadowed 08:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - IShadowed checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  28. Tiptoety has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Per my comments at Talk:Global sysops. Tiptoety talk 09:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Tiptoety checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  29. Those small projects would benefit a lot from this. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 09:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Chamal N checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  30. Herbythyme has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Long overdue --Herby talk thyme 11:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Herbythyme checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  31. Yes BejinhanTalk 12:30, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Bejinhan checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  32. 3s has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    3s 13:11, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - 3s checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  33. ZorroIII has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    ZorroIII 13:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - ZorroIII checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  34. Leinad has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    LeinaD (t) 14:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC) cross-wiki patrollers are very helpful and part of them should have GS priviliges
    Eligible Eligible - Leinad checked by (RT) 23:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  35. Ulflarsen has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Ulflarsen 14:38, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Ulflarsen checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --Ellysse 15:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC) [✖ not eligible—VasilievVV]
    Ineligible Not eligible Agreed, does not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project and at the time of voting and had not been registered for at least 3 months (see also here). - Ellysse checked by (RT) 23:16, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  36. Bjoertvedt has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    -- Bjoertvedt 14:50, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
    Please log in to vote (diff). vvvt 22:35, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible Subsequently logged in (see here) - Bjoertvedt checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  37. Kjetil_r is a sysop on a wiki which will be affected
    --Kjetil_r 16:04, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Kjetil r checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  38. Erwin is a sysop on a wiki which will be affected
    Would definitely be helpful. --Erwin 16:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Erwin checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  39. Dungodung is a sysop on a wiki which will be affected
    I'm a bit skeptical about global blocks, but the rest of the permissions seem fine. --FiliP ██ 16:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Dungodung (FiliP) checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  40. DerHexer has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Same as dungy. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:17, 1 January 2010 (UTC) P.S.: Longer German explanation: w:de:Benutzer:DerHexer/Blog#Global_sysops
    Eligible Eligible - DerHexer checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  41. Jon Harald Søby has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Jon Harald Søby 16:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jon Harald Søby checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  42. Multichill has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Multichill 17:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Multichill checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  43. Atluxity 17:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Atluxity checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  44. (moved vote) - Some users said vandalism etc. on small projects is a bigger problem than I thought. The proposal seems to be fine. Lolsimon 18:11, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Lolsimon checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  45. Petter Bøckman 18:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Petter Bøckman checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  46. Vigorous action 18:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Vigorous action checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  47. Fruggo has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Fruggo 18:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Fruggo checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  48. Sustructu 19:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Please confirm that you are actually nl:User:Sustructu. vvvt 22:53, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible Reinstated, looks fine (See here and also here) - Sustructu checked by (RT) 21:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  49. Vito Genovese has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Per Mike.lifeguard--Vito Genovese 20:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Vito Genovese checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  50. Coffee has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Coffee (talk) 20:46, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Coffee checked by (RT) 23:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  51. Seddon 20:56, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Seddon checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  52. IAlex has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    iAlex 20:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - iAlex checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  53. Mezelf14 has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Mezelf14 21:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Mezelf14 checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  54. Prince Kassad has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    -- Prince Kassad 23:39, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Prince Kassad checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  55. DaB. has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    --DaB. 23:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC) Why not. As long as they don't interfere in middle and big wikis.
    Eligible Eligible - DaB. checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  56. --StG1990 23:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - StG1990 checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  57. Smial has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    -- smial 23:52, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Smial checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  58. Jake Wartenberg may have contributed to wikis which will be affected
    ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 02:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jake Wartenberg checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  59. ZaDiak is a sysop on a wiki which will be affected
    --ZaDiak 02:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - ZaDiak checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  60. Bibliomaniac15 has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    bibliomaniac15 02:25, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Bibliomaniac15 checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  61. Cirt has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Cirt (talk) 06:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Cirt checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  62. Pmlineditor is a sysop on a wiki which will be affected
    Yes. Pmlineditor ∞ 07:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Pmlineditor checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  63. Harrywad has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    -Harrywad 11:28, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Harrywad checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  64. Putnik is a sysop on a wiki which will be affected
    — putnik 12:24, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Putnik checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  65. MF-Warburg is a sysop on two wikis which will be affected
    --MF-W 13:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - MF-Warburg (MF-W) checked by (RT) 21:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  66. Cumulus has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Cumulus 14:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Cumulus checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  67. Support Support lightening the load on stewards with this supporting role. ~ Ningauble 16:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ningauble is a sysop on a project which will be affected by a shift in steward workload. Ningauble appreciates the assistance provided by stewards when no administrators were patrolling, and does not appreciate attempts to deprecate the votes of those who have a valid interest in the outcome. ~ Ningauble 20:01, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Ningauble checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  68. Support Support Sounds good. Glacier Wolf 16:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Glacier Wolf checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  69. A333 has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    A333 19:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - A333 checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  70. --Peroxwhy2gen 08:46, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Peroxwhy2gen checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  71. EdBever has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    EdBever 08:57, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - EdBever checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  72. Red 81 has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Red 81 10:41, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Red 81 checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  73. Lampak has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Lampak 11:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Lampak checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  74. I think we have to help small projects, because they can’t help themselves and vandals can very easily at the beginning of their ‘life’. Tajniak2 14:31, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Tajniak2 checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  75. Taketa has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Taketa 15:12, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Taketa checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  76. Beany 23:49, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Beany checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  77. MBisanz talk 01:31, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - MBisanz checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  78. Robotje has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Robotje 09:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Robotje checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  79. Mhaesen has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Mhaesen 11:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Mhaesen checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  80. Good idea! Aku506 12:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Aku506 checked by (RT) 19:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  81. Erik1980 has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Erik1980 13:57, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Erik1980 checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  82. Herr Kriss is a sysop on a wiki which will be affected
    Herr Kriss 18:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Herr Kriss checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  83. Mwpnl has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    m:Mark W (Mwpnl) ¦ talk 19:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Mwpnl (Mark W) checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  84. ken123 19:26, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - ken123 checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  85. Ency has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Ency 19:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC) pl why not
    Eligible Eligible - Ency checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  86. EMeczKa 20:02, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - EMeczKa checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  87. Merdis has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Merdis 20:05, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Merdis checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  88. Aotearoa has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Aotearoa 20:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Aotearoa checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  89. Trivelt has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Trivelt 21:14, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Trivelt checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  90. Willking1979 01:50, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Willking1979 checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  91. RubiksMaster110 has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    RubiksMaster110 04:08, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - RubiksMaster110 checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  92. Angela has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Angela 04:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Angela checked by (RT) 18:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC).
  93. Phantomsteve 15:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Phantomsteve checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  94. The Evil IP address has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    --The Evil IP address 22:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - The Evil IP address checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
    Annotations of which voters are affected ends here currently; please help add more.
  95. Logan Talk Contributions 02:17, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Logan checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  96. – Innv | d | s: 02:39, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Innv checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  97. Karol007 ✉ 02:53, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Karol007 checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  98. -- Avi 04:09, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Avraham (Avi) checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  99. - miya 06:02, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - miya checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  100. --Bsadowski1 06:12, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Bsadowski1 checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  101. -- Razorflame 06:18, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Razorflame checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  102. Gdarin | talk 10:21, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Gdarin checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  103. Cycn 11:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Cycn checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  104. --Kaganer 13:26, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Kaganer checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  105. Diegusjaimes 14:58, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Diegusjaimes checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  106. --Jan eissfeldt 17:38, 6 January 2010 (UTC) of course
    Eligible Eligible - Jan eissfeldt checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
    User:8BitHero 20:45, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
    ineligible to vote (not enough edits) James (T|C) 00:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. Does not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see also here). - 8BitHero checked by (RT) 04:24, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  107. --Thunderhead 21:51, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Thunderhead checked by (RT) 03:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
    94.224.94.149 23:26, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible IP can't vote; log in required - 94.224.94.149 checked by (RT) 04:13, 6 February 2010 (UTC).
  108. Kafziel 01:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Kafziel checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  109. --Taichi - (あ！) 01:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Taichi checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  110. Frank 01:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Frank checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  111. NativeForeigner 01:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - NativeForeigner checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Valicore 01:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
    ineligible to vote (not enough edits) James (T|C) 00:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. See also here - Valicore checked by (RT) 19:19, 15 February 2010 (UTC).
    Odehammar 01:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC) The stewards must need help, as this proposition has been made. Granting more users stewardship is complicated, as they are already too few. Ergo, this proposition seems to be a solution, at least for now.
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Odehammar checked by (RT) 12:49, 14 February 2010 (UTC).
    Jeffwang16 01:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    ineligible (not enough edits) James (T|C) 01:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. Also not registered for 3 months, see also here - Jeffwang16 checked by (RT) 19:19, 15 February 2010 (UTC).
  112. Addihockey10 01:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Addihockey10 checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Stinging Swarm 01:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You do not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project and at the time of voting you had not been registered for at least 3 months. --(RT) 23:52, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  113. Emrahertr 01:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Emrahertr checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  114. Geni 01:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Geni checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  115. ZooPro 01:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - ZooPro checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  116. Bradybd 01:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Bradybd checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  117. Please, this will be helpful. Ceranthor 01:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible Meets eligibility criteria; no unified login, but link provided - Ceranthor checked by (RT) 22:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC).
    Andrew Petersen 17:54, 6 January 2010 (PST) Alright, then!
    Ip vote, claimed account not eligible James (T|C) 01:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. Voter was not logged in (see evidence) - 76.201.63.246, BlueSatoshi checked by (RT) 12:49, 14 February 2010 (UTC).
  118. Guettarda 01:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Guettarda checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Deehh 01:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    User is ineligable (not enough edits) James (T|C) 01:30, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. See also here - Deehh checked by (RT) 14:13, 14 February 2010 (UTC).
  119. Support Support I see no reason why not, as along as the right people are chosen for the role. Argyle 4 Life 02:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Argyle 4 Life checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    —§ stay (sic)! 02:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Info Note Rechecked. No unified login (see here) - link on user page is needed to verify eligibility to vote - Snake311 checked by (RT) 02:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
    Ineligible Not eligible Links between wiki accounts are unproven, so cannot verify eligibility to vote - a unified account or a link from Meta user page was required for identification - Snake311 checked by (RT) 17:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC).
  120. Syohei.A(talk) 02:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Araisyohei (Syohei.A) checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  121. Blodance 02:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Blodance checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  122. Saebjorn 02:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Saebjorn checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  123. Sander Fraga 02:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Sander Fraga checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  124. Ryan Postlethwaite 02:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Ryan Postlethwaite checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  125. oscar 02:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Oscar checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  126. DrNegative 02:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - DrNegative checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  127. Maxima m 02:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Maxima m checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  128. Evalowyn 02:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Evalowyn checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  129. Mind the gap 02:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Mind the gap checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Gravedig2 2:31 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Gravedig2 checked by (RT) 21:52, 12 February 2010 (UTC).
  130. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Ktr101 (Kevin Rutherford) checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  131. On en-wiki we have many admins that can quickly respond to problems. There are not nearly as many admins on other projects and there is huge potential for pressing matters to get incredibly backlogged. Having global admins will help alleviate this problem. Valley2city‽ 02:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Valley2city checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  132. Even the little projects should have people looking out for them. AP1787 02:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - AP1787 checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  133. Tarheel95 02:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Tarheel95 checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  134. As primarily an en user, and the only other language I understand is Malay, it is unlikely I will ever be involved in a project needing global sysops, but it sounds like it will be a good idea for those that need it Nil Einne 02:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Nil Einne checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  135. Editor182 13:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Editor182 checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    OurDigitalVision Please be more responsible
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - OurDigitalVision checked by (RT) 21:52, 12 February 2010 (UTC).
  136. I don't see why not. Bloodmerchant 03:01, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Bloodmerchant checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  137. Yes, but there is potential for serious misunderstandings caused by language issues Thparkth 03:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Thparkth checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Yes Mimar77 03:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months (see here and also here) - Mimar77 checked by (RT) 21:52, 12 February 2010 (UTC).
    Darkbluesun 03:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC) As wiki gets bigger, this could be the answer to make sure the information stays accurate and clean. On the other hand, this move could seriously slow progress couldn't it? I'll have to trust the stewards. They do a lot of the dirty work.
    user ineligible (not enough edits) James (T|C) 02:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Darkbluesun checked by (RT) 12:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  138. billinghurst 03:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Absolutely.
    Eligible Eligible - Billinghurst checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  139. Carl 03:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible Meets eligibility criteria; no unified login, but link provided - Radiocrazy (Carl) checked by (RT) 22:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC).
  140. --Taweetham 03:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Taweetham checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  141. Commander Keane 03:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Commander Keane checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    This has tremendous potential to improve the capacity of smaller projects, and to encourage a sort of broad-based community. I look forward to seeing how this will operate Steve Joseph 03:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Steve Joseph checked by (RT) 21:52, 12 February 2010 (UTC).
  142. Perey 03:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Makes perfect sense to me. Clearly the stewards need the help, or else this would have been a non-proposal.
    Eligible Eligible - Perey checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  143. This change is long overdue, as experience with chr wikipedia demonstrated a few years ago. Wikiacc (§) 03:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Wikiacc checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    iSquishy
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - iSquishy checked by (RT) 21:52, 12 February 2010 (UTC).
  144. Yes. Teinesavaii 03:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Teinesavaii checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  145. Zwilson14 03:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Zwilson14 checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  146. Shooter16101 03:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Shooter16101 checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  147. Yes. --The New Mikemoral 03:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - The New Mikemoral checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  148. DerAndre 04:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - DerAndre checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Yes, Fully support --Bentoman 04:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Bentoman checked by (RT) 21:52, 12 February 2010 (UTC).
    Adi4094 04:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    User ineligible (must have registered before October 1st) James (T|C) 02:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months (see here and also here) - Adi4094 checked by (RT) 12:49, 14 February 2010 (UTC).
    --§Triple.Rhu 04:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. Vote was actually by 트리플루 (see evidence) who was registered for less than 3 months with insufficient edits (see here and also here) - 트리플루 (Triple.Rhu) checked by (RT) 23:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC).
  149. Support Support Shivashree 04:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Shivashree checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  150. Support Support Calebrw 04:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Calebrw checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  151. Yes, --Sarumo74 04:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC).
    Eligible Eligible - Sarumo74 checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Mr. Anon515 04:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Mr. Anon515 checked by (RT) 23:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC).
  152. --Bellayet 04:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Bellayet checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  153. --Atu 04:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Atu checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  154. Support Support As long as it's not abused, it's a good idea. For.--Maximz2005 04:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Maximz2005 checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  155. Yk Yk Yk 04:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Yk Yk Yk checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  156. Yes. Magnefl 04:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Magnefl checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    --Fischy 04:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Fischy checked by (RT) 23:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC).
    Terence 05:01, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Info Note Rechecked. No unified login (see here) - link on user page is needed to verify eligibility to vote - Terence checked by (RT) 02:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
    Ineligible Not eligible Links between wiki accounts are unproven, so cannot verify eligibility to vote - a unified account or a link from Meta user page was required for identification - Terence checked by (RT) 17:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC).
  157. Yes. Logical proposal providing necessary help. Ezratrumpet 05:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Ezratrumpet checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  158. Juan Miguel 05:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Juan Miguel checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  159. --J Hazard 05:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - J Hazard checked by (RT) 14:26, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  160. If help is needed then we should help Chaosdruid 05:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Chaosdruid checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Yes. We need a way to quickly stop vandalism. Eric Scubeesnax 05:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Info Note Rechecked. No unified login (see here) - link on user page is needed to verify eligibility to vote - Scubeesnax checked by (RT) 02:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
    Ineligible Not eligible Links between wiki accounts are unproven, so cannot verify eligibility to vote - a unified account or a link from Meta user page was required for identification - Scubeesnax checked by (RT) 17:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC).
  161. Yes. Seablade 05:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Info Note Rechecked. No unified login (see here) - link on user page is needed to verify eligibility to vote - Seablade checked by (RT) 02:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
  162. Pictogram voting support.svg Jamesjiao 05:34, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jamesjiao checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Yes Noraft 05:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    User ineligible (registered after October 1st 2009)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months (see here and also here) - Noraft checked by (RT) 12:49, 14 February 2010 (UTC).
  163. Alvaro qc 05:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Alvaro qc checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  164. Support Support Yes --Delivi 05:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Delivi checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  165. Because the projects are allowed to opt-out. -- kh80 05:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Kh80 checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  166. Support Support. It is very good idea. Mondalor 05:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Mondalor checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  167. Geanixx 05:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Geanixx checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  168. Support Support I think it goes without saying that Global sysops should be chosen very carefully from a pool of multi-lingual users with considerable experience in several different wiki's. Considering the brutal scrutiny local sysops candidates undergo, I don't think quality control and carefree sysopsing on a global scale is a concern. Angrysockhop 06:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Angrysockhop checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  169. Support Support IlyaHaykinson 06:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - IlyaHaykinson checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  170. Support Support Aldo samulo 06:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Aldo samulo checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  171. Nixón 06:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Nixón checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  172. Support Support The wikis that are this small need the extra help, and as long as the Global sysops are picked carefully, I think that the idea is an excellent way to make sure they get that help. Trinity507 06:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Trinity507 checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  173. Support Support IVP 06:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - IVP checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --84.60.37.89 06:34, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ip vote, please login to vote James (T|C) 02:54, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
  174. Support Support nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 06:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Nat checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  175. Support Support --Labant 06:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sadly you are [ineligible to vote because you registered on October 4th 2009 (the requirement is October 1st) If you have an old account that is eligible to vote please feel free to use that and your opinion is of course still welcome and you can join in on the discussions. James (T|C) 03:45, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible Rechecked and reinstated. At the time of voting Labant had been registered for 3 months on de wikipedia and had sufficient edits, meeting the eligibility criteria set out at the head of this page (see here) - Labant checked by (RT) 19:11, 15 February 2010 (UTC).
  176. Kv75 06:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Kv75 checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support'd. perhaps wikis on external sites elect to be included in this list, if they feel that they would be better off with the aid of these obviously-very-qualified editors. I assume wikis about specific topics are not under Wikimedia's administration, but if they are being overrun with vandals or have administrators fighting, these sites could issue a metaphorical call for help through whatever medium we set up. The next version of the wiki software could include a tag of whether or not to allow these people power, and they (the external wikis) could add themselves to the privilege list. Sompm 06:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Sompm checked by (RT) 23:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC).
  177. Support Support--Shizhao 06:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Shizhao checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  178. --Heiko 06:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Heiko checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  179. Hohohob 07:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Hohohob checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  180. Support Support - Wysprgr2005 07:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Wysprgr2005 checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  181. --Djlordi 07:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Djlordi checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  182. Support Supportמתניה 07:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - מתניה checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  183. Support Support Dovi 07:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Dovi checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  184. Support Support --Caponer 07:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Caponer checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  185. Support Support CaribDigita 07:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC) I read through many of the "No"s and I believe Global sysops might be able to guide new upstart projects in the right direction until they get more established. As it was stated, if it just simply deleted because it is small, then nothing new will ever obtain the chance to become firmly established.
    Eligible Eligible - CaribDigita checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support seems to be a good idea, to support understaffed wikis --Nickaat 08:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Nickaat checked by (RT) 23:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC).
  186. Support Support Kimchi.sg 08:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Kimchi.sg checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  187. Support Support - seems like a good idea--Pianoplonkers 08:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Pianoplonkers checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support CntRational 08:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Sure.
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - CntRational checked by (RT) 23:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --Petri 08:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    User ineligible (not enough edits) James (T|C) 03:58, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible The Petri account does not have sufficient edits (see also here); possibly the same user as Pjr, but no link provided - Petri checked by (RT) 13:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  188. Support Support - if a project still has the right to decide if global sysops should have admin rights in their project, then yes. Cavernia 08:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Cavernia checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support -- Clamiax 09:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Clamiax checked by (RT) 23:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC).
  189. Great idea! —what a crazy random happenstance 08:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Happenstance checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  190. --DS-fax 08:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Hat600 (DS-fax) checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  191. Support Support +1 I think that this would avoid SURP and other cross wikis problems. --Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 08:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Tyw7 checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  192. Support Support Merlissimo 08:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Merlissimo checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  193. Support Support In the early stage of the project, someone who don't know project's language may get admin right for maintenance. After the project grow enough, that admin right might be questioned by newcomers, as they don't have neither consensus nor RfA. Global sysop can avoid those situation, I think. If it was mandatory for all project, I might say No. --Peremen 08:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Peremen checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  194. Support Support Kenrick95 08:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Kenrick95 checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  195. Support Support --Wvk 08:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Wvk checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  196. --Treublatt 08:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Treublatt checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  197. Support Support VMS Mosaic 08:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - VMS Mosaic checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  198. Support Support --Lutz Terheyden 08:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Lutz Terheyden checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  199. Support Support --Faizhaider 08:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Faizhaider checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  200. Support Support, I like this idea. --Mercy 09:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Mercy checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  201. Support Support --Ragimiri 09:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Ragimiri checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  202. Support Support good idea for small projects --Tlusťa 09:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Tlusťa checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  203. Support Support Reduction of Steward - workload by distributing "simple" admin tasks on adminless wikis. --Guandalug 09:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Guandalug checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  204. Support Support While I have grave reservations about adding in extra levels of hierarchy (K.I.S.S.), after carefully reading through this I can see the point of it so I support it. Mathmo 09:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible Meets eligibility criteria; no unified login, but link provided - Mathmo checked by (RT) 22:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC).
  205. Support Support --Vigilius 09:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Vigilius checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  206. Support Support - Very efficient way to improove the organization of "understaffed" projects. Leujohn (talk) 09:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Leujohn checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  207. Support Support I have personally been part of many small-languages Wikipedias where a shortage of admins doing trivial (ie. non-controversial) tasks has slowed the project's growth. DaGizza 09:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - DaGizza checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  208. --Euku 09:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Euku checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    --Fschubert 09:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    user ineligible (account created after October 1st 2009) James (T|C) 23:58, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Fschubert checked by (RT) 16:29, 13 February 2010 (UTC).
  209. Weak support. Generally a good idea but I have a queasy feeling about global blocks. According to Global blocking, such blocks would extend to all WMF wikis, even those outside the global sysop scope. Which is OK as long as a global sysop's main task is combatting massive blatant vandalism on very small projects, so I'd say give the proposal a try and see how it works out.--GrafZahl (talk) 10:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - GrafZahl checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  210. Support Support Makes sense. rursus 10:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Rursus checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  211. Support Support -- Klaus Eifert 10:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Klaus Eifert checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  212. Support Support Yes/Kyllä --Jepse 10:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jepse checked by (RT) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  213. Support Support Seems sensibly bounded by parameters. --Dweller 10:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Dweller checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  214. Support Support--Rsmn 10:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Rsmn checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  215. Support Support --Harald Haugland 10:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Harald Haugland checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  216. Support Support Very sensible idea for projects just getting started. --Clarince63 10:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Clarince63 checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  217. Support Support --Wedderkop 10:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Wedderkop checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  218. Great idea. Pitke 10:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Pitke checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  219. Support Support A well-thought-out way to give small wikis the boost they need to get their act together. Freederick 10:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Freederick checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  220. Support Support A Very Good Thing, especially for the small wikis, especially since any that wish to opt out can do so. Andrew Dalby 10:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Andrew Dalby checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  221. Support Support Seems like a good idea. Alan16 10:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Alan16 checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support A stimulating way to get admins of small wiki's who don't want to be "overruled" to do their work. Rmeoung 11:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 22:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  222. Support Support I like the idea very much that small projects get more help in the beginning and can more easily grow. :-) There are so many languages in this world, we don't have just these few that have already a Wikipedia. --Geitost diskusjon 11:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Geitost checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  223. Support Support Sahmeditor 11:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Sahmeditor checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  224. Support Support ThorJH 11:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - ThorJH checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  225. Support Support Razimantv 11:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Razimantv checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  226. Support Support There seem to be enough restrictions, like ability of projects to opt out that I think there are enough checks that this will be net good. Jbolden1517 11:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jbolden1517 checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  227. Support Support notafish }<';> 11:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Notafish checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  228. Support Support --თოგო (D) 11:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Thogo (თოგო) checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  229. Support Support Support blindspots can create significant problems for the project as a whole. SamJohnston 11:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - SamJohnston checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  230. Working on a small wiki myself I can see this being something of a Godsend for most. Garden 11:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Garden checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  231. Support Support Daniel (‽) 11:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Dbmag9 (Daniel) checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  232. Support Support Seems good to me. I am a Sysop on the Wikis I have, I know how hard it is to keep them "clean" Knee427 11:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Knee427 checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  233. Support Support Absolutley WilliamF1two 11:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - WilliamF1two checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support I agree with the folks who say that a small wiki without enough admins shouldn't be shut down. It may someday grow into something great. JulieSpaulding 11:59, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible JulieSpaudling account is ineligible (see here and also here); actual vote was by Artic Night (see evidence), who has not provided links and has not unified their account - JulieSpaulding checked by (RT) 17:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  234. Support Support. The ability to hit vandals across the various language wikipedias will be a net positive. Mjroots 12:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC) ( Admin Mjroots on en.wiki)
    Eligible Eligible - Mjroots checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  235. Support Support. Very useful for our job at SWMT. --Lucien leGrey (m · es) 12:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Lucien leGrey checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  236. Support Support we'll be very useful for the little project (even on the french wikisource, we're short of admin sometimes !). Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 12:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - VIGNERON checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  237. Support Support --ThT 12:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - ThT checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  238. Support Support Vladimir.frolov 12:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Vladimir.frolov checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  239. --alexscho 12:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Alexscho checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  240. Support Support Tomatoman 12:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Tomatoman checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Trdsf 12:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    You are not eligible for voting. – Innv | d | s: 07:09, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see also here) - Trdsf checked by (RT) 19:35, 15 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support--Cyrillic 12:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Seems like a good idea.
    Info Note Rechecked. No unified login (see here) - link on user page is needed to verify eligibility to vote - Cyrillic checked by (RT) 02:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
    Ineligible Not eligible Links between wiki accounts are unproven, so cannot verify eligibility to vote - a unified account or a link from Meta user page was required for identification - Cyrillic checked by (RT) 17:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC).
  241. --Nemo 12:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Nemo bis checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  242. Support Support Mheart 12:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Mheart checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  243. Support Support --Pitlane02 12:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Pitlane02 checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Doktorbuk 12:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Info Note Rechecked. No unified login (see here) - link on user page is needed to verify eligibility to vote - Doktorbuk checked by (RT) 02:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
    Ineligible Not eligible Links between wiki accounts are unproven, so cannot verify eligibility to vote - a unified account or a link from Meta user page was required for identification - Doktorbuk checked by (RT) 17:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC).
  244. ⇦REDVERS⇨ 13:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Redvers checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  245. Support Support --BokicaK 13:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - BokicaK checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  246. Support Support - As much as I despise most of the janitors on the English Wikipedia, I do recognize that their existance is necessary. This proposal seems perfectly rational and unlikely to cause strife for the small projects it will effect given its opt-out clause. Nutiketaiel 13:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Nutiketaiel checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  247. Support Support - While it would probably be preferable to have a larger, more active stewards corp (which if it existed would negate the need for this proposal), we don't. Chrism 13:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Chrism checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  248. Support Support - Proposal seems rational and for the betterment of the entire Wiki community. --Mwilso24 13:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Mwilso24 checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  249. Support Support J-L Cavey 13:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - J-L Cavey checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  250. Support Support I agree, small wiki have problems to get sysop. Vasiľ 13:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Vasiľ checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  251. Support Support Will help us get at cross-wiki vandals who use small wikis to create malicious accounts. NawlinWiki 13:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - NawlinWiki checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support 194.41.152.158 13:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
  252. Support Support Muro de Aguas 13:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Muro de Aguas checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  253. Support Support Tostan 13:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Tostan checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  254. Support Support Conaughy 13:59, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Info Note Rechecked. No unified login (see here) - link on user page is needed to verify eligibility to vote - Conaughy checked by (RT) 02:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support I think this is a good way to improve small wikis -- HF cars and sets 14:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 17:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  255. Support Support Good idea. Raychut 14:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Raychut checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Yes. Tgkprog 14:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 17:28, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  256. Yes. Swatjester 14:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Swatjester checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  257. Support Support Evet! --Goktr001 14:12, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Goktr001 checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  258. Support Support I support. Albertus Aditya 14:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Albertus Aditya checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  259. Support Support Linedwell@frwiki 14:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Linedwell checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  260. Support Support --FischX 14:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - FischX checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  261. Support Support--VincenzoX 14:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - VincenzoX checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  262. Support Support --амдф 14:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Amdf (амдф) checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  263. Support Support --TheGrimReaper NS 14:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - TheGrimReaper NS checked by (RT) 17:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  264. --Sanbec 15:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Sanbec checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  265. Joe N 15:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Vote made by an IP -Barras talk 18:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible Rechecked and reinstated. Voter logged in (see evidence); registered in 2007 and had sufficient edits (see here and also here) - Joe N checked by (RT) 16:29, 13 February 2010 (UTC).
  266. Support Support A sensible extra layer of defense against mass vandalism attacks. Durova 15:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Durova checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  267. Support Support --Frank schubert 15:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Frank schubert checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  268. Support Support I have no reason not to vote on this good idea... A idea that helps wikipedia, why don't vote? SunProj3cT 15:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - SunProj3cT checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  269. Support Support -- small wikis need some help. Renata3 15:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Renata3 checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  270. Support Support Taking a hit for the little guy sounds good to me. Neelix 15:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible Meets eligibility criteria; no unified login, but link provided - Neelix checked by (RT) 22:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC).
  271. Sandstein 15:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Sandstein checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  272. Support Support. Since trust is not a matter of languages -- Vwm 15:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Vwm checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  273. Support Support Christian Giersing 15:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Christian Giersing checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  274. Don't agree with the silly support templates but chalk this up as a support Spartaz 15:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Spartaz checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  275. Support Support --Engelbaet 15:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Engelbaet checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support IF handled with care, it's worth a try. Especially potentially useful for small Wikip-projects --ArchiSchmedes Talk 15:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 17:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  276. Support Support for small wikis only, where stewards were (and still currently are, I suppose) performing such anti-vandalism tasks. --Paginazero - Ø 15:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Paginazero checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  277. Support Support --ゆきち 15:59, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Yukichi99 (ゆきち) checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  278. Support Support This is an important tool to help moribund languages or ones whose users are not very net-savvy to get a leg up. Warmest Regards, :)—thecurran Speak your mind my past 16:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Thecurran checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  279. Support Support Carolfrog 16:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Info Note Rechecked. No unified login (see here) - link on user page is needed to verify eligibility to vote - Carolfrog checked by (RT) 02:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
    Eligible Eligible Rechecked. Login account now unified - Carolfrog checked by (RT) 11:31, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  280. Support Support Neeters 16:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Neeters checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  281. Support Support Juliabackhausen 16:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Juliabackhausen checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  282. Support Support -- zur887 16:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Zur887 checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  283. Support Support --Morten Haan 16:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Morten Haan checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support robaco 16:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    robaco would have been entitled to voted later in the voting period - however at the time of voting 150 edits had not been reached (137 on pt wiki). --(RT) 17:19, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  284. Support Support --Lépton ✉ 16:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Lépton checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  285. Support Support --Transmissionelement 16:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Transmissionelement checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  286. Support Support --Jonathan Groß 16:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jonathan Groß checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  287. Support Support Sensible approach to solving a real problem. FloNight 16:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - FloNight checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --TheBestPilarYouWillEverSee 16:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - TheBestPilarYouWillEverSee checked by (RT) 22:53, 10 February 2010 (UTC).
  288. Support Support –neurovelho 16:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Neurovelho checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  289. Support Support. JamieS93 16:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - JamieS93 checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  290. Support Support Kubłok31 16:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Kubłok31 checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  291. Support Support /Poxnar 16:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Poxnar checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  292. Support Support Tpt 16:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Tpt checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  293. Support Support Tuvalkin 17:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Tuvalkin checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  294. Support Support Hosiryuhosi 17:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Hosiryuhosi checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  295. Support Support --FlügelRad 17:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - FlügelRad checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  296. Support Support Fantastic idea, as long as they are not annoying and act "the hard man". Conay 17:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Conay checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  297. Support Support --Anthony Ivanoff 17:17, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Anthony Ivanoff checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  298. Support Support this idea. Actually it has already been tested in Wikia (helpers), and it works. Wassily Steik 17:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible Meets eligibility criteria; no unified account, but link provided - Медиа (Wassily Steik) checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  299. Support Support Hrcolyer 17:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Hrcolyer checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  300. Support Support Catherine 17:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - CatherineMunro (Catherine) checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Jyka 19:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Jyka checked by (RT) 22:53, 10 February 2010 (UTC).
  301. Support Support With caution, as per Kimdino. — OwenBlacker (Talk) 17:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - OwenBlacker checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  302. Support Support Kaldari 17:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Kaldari checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  303. Support Support Arkuat 17:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC) The opt-out by local consensus is very important to me; it looks as if a project with 10 administrators, 3 of whom are active at any given time, can opt-out by consensus. Otherwise I wouldn't support.
    Eligible Eligible - Arkuat checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  304. Laser brain 17:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Laser brain checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  305. Support Support Ateria 17:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Ateria checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Braveheart09 17:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Braveheart09 would have been entitled to voted later in the voting period - however at the time of voting 150 edits had not been reached. --(RT) 17:15, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  306. Support Support The Anome 17:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - The Anome checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  307. Support Support Migt be useful for small african wikis JAn Dudík 17:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - JAn Dudík checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  308. Support Support Will be good for smaller Wikis. But let´s see if is it working or not. --Chmee2 17:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Chmee2 checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  309. Support Support SBC-YPR 17:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - SBC-YPR checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  310. Support Support --DieBuche 18:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - DieBuche checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Why not? Clearly, many smaller projects need this. Innotata 18:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). At the time of voting you had not been registered for at least 3 months. (You registered on 7 January 2010). --(RT) 17:10, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  311. Support Support Stefaniak 18:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Stefaniak checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  312. Support. -AlexSm 18:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Alex Smotrov (AlexSm) checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  313. Support --M/ 18:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - M7 (M/) checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  314. Support Support Rajiv Varma 18:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Rajiv Varma checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  315. Support Support --Amrum 18:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Amrum checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  316. Very yes. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 18:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Amorymeltzer (Amory) checked by (RT) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --Pattiz 18:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Pattiz checked by (RT) 22:53, 10 February 2010 (UTC).
  317. Support Support Yo creo que esto es algo bueno para la wiki ya que hay muchos vandalos--Moms10 19:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Moms10 checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  318. Support Support Cocoaguytalkcontribs‽ 19:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Cocoaguy checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  319. Support Support --Krdan 19:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Krdan checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  320. Support Support Raysonho 19:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Raysonho checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  321. Support Support --Toobaz 19:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Toobaz checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --Dunshocking 19:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Happy to support the majority vote; thanks for the vote!
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Dunshocking checked by (RT) 22:53, 10 February 2010 (UTC).
  322. --Thalan
    Eligible Eligible - Thalan checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  323. Seems useful. No such power than stewards --Sargoth 19:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Sargoth checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  324. Support Support Sebk. 19:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Sebk. checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  325. Support Support --Amir E. Aharoni 19:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Amire80 (Amir E. Aharoni) checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  326. Izno 19:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Izno checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --Skamecrazy123 19:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Skamecrazy123 checked by (RT) 22:53, 10 February 2010 (UTC).
  327. Support Support - Eric-Wester 19:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Eric-Wester checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  328. Support Support -- Cozzycovers 19:55, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Cozzycovers checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  329. Support Support Good idea. I believe it can help the projects. --egg 19:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Egg checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  330. Support Support Seems a good idea - Lnegro 20:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Lnegro checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  331. Support Support I wonder about knowledge about local languages (and of the sustainability of a project with less than 10 admins over the long term). There are good practical reasons stated in the oppose section below (such as the need for global admins to exercise sensitivity with respect to allowing smaller wiki to develop autonomously) but in essence this seems quite practical. --rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid (coṁrá) 20:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Rannpháirtí anaithnid (coṁrá) checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  332. Support Support - Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) 20:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jeffrey Mall checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  333. Support Support GameOn 20:12, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - GameOn checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support - Armageddon11 20:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Armageddon11 checked by (RT) 22:53, 10 February 2010 (UTC).
  334. Support Support - Rainmonger 20:17, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Rainmonger checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  335. Support Support I think this will be a very helpful position for developing the smaller Wikipedia projects and it seems like very little harm can come from this, so I support it. I Feel Tired 20:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - I Feel Tired checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  336. Support Support --Alterego 20:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Alterego checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  337. Support Support – ClockworkSoul 20:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC): This seems like a good idea in principle, and I'll be interested to see how it develops.
    Eligible Eligible - ClockworkSoul checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  338. Shii 20:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Shii checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  339. --Osd@ruwiki 20:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Osd checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  340. --Philippe 20:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Philippe checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  341. --Enemenemu 20:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Looks like a solution for a problem
    Eligible Eligible - Enemenemu checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  342. Support Support Sole Soul 21:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Sole Soul checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  343. --AFBorchert 21:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC) I assume that small wikis will profit from this solution. Most vandalisms or spam postings are in English or other major languages, not necessarily in the language of the small wikis. Similarly, copyright violations can be in many cases handled without knowing the wiki's language.
    Eligible Eligible - AFBorchert checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  344. Support Support – Lumos3 21:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Small Wikis need the protection of the whole community or they may be vunerable to disruption which in turn will reflect on the reputation of the whole of Wikipedia.
    Eligible Eligible - Lumos3 checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Gkarpljuk 22:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 02:06, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  345. Support Support Wikipedia is big; around 3 million articles by 20 million users. However lots of the amount is vandalism which should be reduced if the idea comes true. Jeremjay24 21:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jeremjay24 checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  346. Support Support Pschemp 21:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Pschemp checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Knuddel8 22:21, 7 January 2010 (CET) I support that. I don't think the volunteers will abuse their rights and I don't think that their will be any volunteers chosen who aren't serious enough.
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 02:02, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  347. Support Support Absolute power corrupts absolutely; it's a Good Thing this isn't absolute power. Dhatfield 21:23, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Dhatfield checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support IzzyReal We as a collective entity need to protect the smaller articles. So Heck yeah!
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 01:55, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  348. Support Support --Dreaven3 21:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Dreaven3 checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --cslatlantis 16:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC) Totally great idea. Too many people have been screwing up the facts.
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 01:50, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  349. Support Support --Gereon K. 21:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Gereon K. checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  350. Support Support --Daemorris 21:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Daemorris checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --Ding1dong 21:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 01:46, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  351. Support Support As long as we are admitting that this is a work around until the smaller wikis can better handle the scourge of internet flaming. I think that inter-wiki cooperation is part of the core of the Wikipedia spirit.--Adam in MO Talk 21:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Adamfinmo (Adam in MO) checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  352. Support Support --Abaumg 21:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Abaumg checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  353. Support Support Nbarth 21:50, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Nbarth checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  354. Support Support Unusual? Quite TalkQu 22:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - QuiteUnusual checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  355. Support Support - Vinvlugt 22:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible Meets eligibility criteria; no unified login, but link provided - Vinvlugt checked by (RT) 22:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support -  Kaltxì Na'vi!  22:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    You are ineligible to vote (registration before October 1, 2009 is required). --Church of emacs talk 23:32, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Na'vi checked by (RT) 12:49, 14 February 2010 (UTC).
  356. Support Support -- Sounds interesting and worth a go. DD2K 22:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - DD2K checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  357. Support Support -- All Wikipedias bear the same logo, while quality is varying. Global sysops can support the local stewarts, esp. blocking of vandals etc. -- Vertigo Man-iac 22:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Vertigo Man-iac checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  358. Support Support – This sounds like a very good idea. We desperately need more structures for inter-wiki communication and coordination, as well as filling a role that the stewards are unable to manage through shortage of numbers. I would be keen to see proposals for meetings of the GSs every ?three months or so, possibly with the stewards. Tony1 22:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Tony1 checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  359. Support Support I like this idea --Adrille 22:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Adrille checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  360. Support Support --Zinnmann 22:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Zinnmann checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  361. Support Support ok -Kacembepower 22:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Kacembepower checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support G8crash3r 22:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Great idea. I think I can help out if given the opportunity.
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You do not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project and at the time of voting you had not been registered for at least 3 months. --(RT) 01:40, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  362. Support Support I support the motion Endo999 22:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Endo999 checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  363. Support Support - Much needed. -- Avenue 22:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Avenue checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  364. Support Support --ysangkok 22:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Ysangkok checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  365. Majorly talk 23:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Majorly checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  366. Support Support I agree with the idea behind this as long as the opt-out is there. Woody 23:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Woody checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  367. Support Support --Pelz 23:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Pelz checked by (RT) 19:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  368. Support Support - I support whatever will provide help for smaller wikis. -- Atama頭 23:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Atama checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  369. Support Support - We need effective ways and tools against vandalism. I hope this will help! --Ulanwp 23:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Ulanwp checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  370. Support Support --Computerjoe 23:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Computerjoe checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  371. Support Support -- Montgomery 23:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Montgomery checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  372. Support Support I agree with Paginazero. --Fredericks 23:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Fredericks checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  373. Support Support Makes sense to me.-LtMuldoon
    Eligible Eligible - LtMuldoon checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  374. Yup. Makes perfect sense. BG7 23:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Bluegoblin7 (BG7) checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  375. Support Support --MoRsE 23:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - MoRsE checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  376. Support Support --Schmendrik881 23:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Schmendrik881 checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  377. Support Support Adambro 00:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Adambro checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  378. Support Support --Something12356789101 00:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Something12356789101 checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  379. Support Support Royalbroil 00:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Royalbroil checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  380. Support Support --Emes 00:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Emes checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  381. Support Support Fetchcomms 00:33, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Fetchcomms checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --Rab777hp 19:32, 8 January 2019 (EST) This is necessary because it helps keep the level of control up, and also deals with the question of allowing more stewards in or not.
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 01:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
    Support Support I think this is a reasonable way to maintain a level of nessacary controll, and continue to foster an productive environment for the free exchange of ideas. Rampant unicorn 00:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 01:29, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  382. Support Support I'm not convinced this will solve all the issues it is supposed to, but it's certainly worth a try Wefa 00:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Wefa checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Annotations start here
  383. Support Support AndrewRT 00:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC) Sounds reasonable and positive, with the greatest potential for harm neutralised through allowing opt outs. In practice I think it's naive to think the idea that global sysops will remain strictly limited to "urgent abuse and non-controversial maintenance" and would not end up with the same power structure attributes that en-wp admins have. Likewise, I'm not positive about asking stewards to make the decision (they should be strictly implementing community decisions only). Nonetheless, still support. AndrewRT 00:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - AndrewRT checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  384. Support Support bonne idée --Ofol 01:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Ofol checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  385. St. Alex has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support --St. Alex 01:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - St. Alex checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  386. Support Support --E020613 01:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - E020613 checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  387. Support Support Definitely a good idea. —MC10 (T•C•L•EM) 01:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - MC10 checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  388. Support Support Sneaky 013 01:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Sneaky 013 checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  389. Wesha has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support -- Wesha 02:06, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Wesha checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  390. Ukexpat has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support --Ukexpat 02:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Ukexpat checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  391. Support, sounds like a good idea--Jac16888 02:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jac16888 checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  392. Support Support --Giants27 Talk to Me 02:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Giants27 checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  393. Wikitiki89 has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support --Wikitiki89 02:13, 8 January 2010 (UTC) The only thing I have to say is that I think the requirements for number of admins should be changed because I feel that ten admins or three active admins is not nearly enough admins.
    Eligible Eligible - Wikitiki89 checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  394. Support Support Themfromspace 02:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Themfromspace checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  395. --Jodoform 02:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jodoform checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  396. Support Support--Christian Lindecke 02:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Christian Lindecke checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  397. Support Support GreenReaper 02:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - GreenReaper checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  398. the ed17 has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Yup, but we need to be sure that these people are unequivocally and completely trusted before appointing them to a position like this. Ed (talk) 02:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - The ed17 (Ed) checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  399. Support Support Slark 02:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Slark checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  400. Support Support --Patar knight 02:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Patar knight checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  401. Support Support Seems sane enough and commensurate with the problem. --Kay Dekker 02:29, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Kay Dekker checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  402. Support Support Nothing I can think of that would make this a bad idea. --Shirik 02:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Shirik checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  403. Starblind/Andrew Lenahan has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support Andrew Lenahan 02:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Starblind (Andrew Lenahan) checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  404. Support Support ~fl 02:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Fl checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  405. Support Support Bouchecl 02:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Bouchecl checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  406. Support Support BfPage Hey can I be one of those sysops?
    Eligible Eligible - Bfpage checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  407. Jack Merridew has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support — a very good idea. Cheers, Jack Merridew 02:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jack Merridew checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Jamie314 02:33, 8 January 2010 (UTC) This is fine, provided there is adequate moderation. As others have said, we don't want to create power issues or invite abuse.
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Jamie314 checked by (RT) 23:04, 10 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support--Personplacething 02:06, 8 January 2010 (UTC) I strongly agree with this proposal.
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Personplacething checked by (RT) 23:04, 10 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support--9548coolgirl 20:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC) This is the best idea I've heard of. I for one support this cause. Oh, and my vote is yes.
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - 9548coolgirl checked by (RT) 23:04, 10 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --Plommespiser 19:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Plommespiser checked by (RT) 23:04, 10 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support--jmans25 20:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC) This is good, as long as they get a lot less privileges than anmins. We DON'T need another group with the same privileges than admins.
    Sorry, you are ineligible for voting. John Vandenberg 16:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see also here) - Jmans25 checked by (RT) 23:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --Deanmullen09 21:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC) In the word of the hopi indians "those who cannot accept change will fall dead with their own fear of that change" so why not?
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). At the time of voting you had not been registered for at least 3 months. (You registered on 26 October 2009). --(RT) 22:07, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  408. Tentative Support Support Shoefly 18:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC) This change should not create any power monopolies.
    Eligible Eligible - Shoefly checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  409. Support Support Christopher Pritchard 18:14, 7 January 2010 (UTC), I support as I feel that it will allow for more people to focus on editing, with less people needing to be sysops (as the global ones can take care of this)
    Eligible Eligible - Christopher Pritchard checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  410. Support Support User: Gullit Torres, I support because I think it'll get better the the Wikipedia's jod, chosing the best people and increasing the articles.
    Eligible Eligible - Gullit Torres checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Carptrash 17:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC) I'll try anything . . . . ...... once.
    Info Note Rechecked. No unified login (see here) - link on user page is needed to verify eligibility to vote - Carptrash checked by (RT) 02:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
    Ineligible Not eligible Links between wiki accounts are unproven, so cannot verify eligibility to vote - a unified account or a link from Meta user page was required for identification - Carptrash checked by (RT) 17:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support (Wiki id2 16:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC))
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). At the time of voting you had not been registered for at least 3 months. (You registered on 16 November 2009). --(RT) 21:57, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  411. Support SupportKimdino 15:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Care needs to be taken on appointment of these people though. I believe they will need to operate with a light touch. They must also realise that they are subsidiary to the wiki 'owners' and only providing a supporting role. Certainly, as stated elsewhere, no hitlers.
    Eligible Eligible - Kimdino checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    {{Orion11}} Yes, thats good —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.229.164.197 (talk • contribs) 2010-01-07T14:20:57 (UTC)
    Anon vote. John Vandenberg 08:34, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. Voter was not logged in (see evidence); Orion11 did not log in to vote (see here) - 79.229.164.197, Orion11 checked by (RT) 12:49, 14 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support I think this is a great idea, provided care is taken in choosing the right person for thejob. It will go wrong if we recruit people who are likely to go all superior and start being nazi on editing. TomBeasley 13:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). At the time of voting you had not been registered for at least 3 months. (You registered on 20 November 2009). --(RT) 21:53, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
    Support SupportFindiver13:17, 7 January 2010 (UTC) I like the above wording : "start being nazi on editing"
    Sorry, you are ineligible for voting. John Vandenberg 16:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see also here) - Findiver checked by (RT) 19:35, 15 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support DarioAlvarez
    Sorry, you are ineligible for voting. John Vandenberg 16:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see also here) - DarioAlvarez checked by (RT) 19:35, 15 February 2010 (UTC).
  412. --Teepoet 10:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC) Yes.
    Eligible Eligible - Teepoet checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    James Brian Ellis 08:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). At the time of voting you had not been registered for at least 3 months. (You registered on 13 December 2009). --(RT) 21:49, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
  413. WngLdr34 04:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC) I for one support our new Sysop overlords (seriously though there are too many mods we need supermods, hells yes.
    Eligible Eligible - WngLdr34 checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  414. Support Support with obvious need for careful thought in the selection process. Kafka Liz 03:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Kafka Liz checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  415. Closedmouth has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    --Closedmouth 03:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Closedmouth checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  416. Support Support I think this is a good thing as long as one is qualified and this does not start an issue of power abuse. Canyouhearmenow
    Info Note Rechecked. No unified login (see here) - link on user page is needed to verify eligibility to vote - Canyouhearmenow checked by (RT) 02:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
  417. Support Support A vandal can run wild on a smaller wiki with only rollbackers around to control them. Any viable project has enough local privileges to close deletion discussions, run RfA's, etc. But, as I understand the proposal, global sysops are for blocking vandals, removing obvious spam/attack pages, etc- things that need done ASAP, not when the stretched thin local admins are online. Bradjamesbrown 03:23, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Bradjamesbrown checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  418. Roberto de Lyra has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support Good idea. Roberto de Lyra 03:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Roberto de Lyra checked by (RT) 22:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support I like this idea, it will hopefully further prevent vandalism on the wikis. --Thejetset1 03:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Thejetset1 checked by (RT) 16:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC).
  419. Support Support Steven Walling (talk) 03:42, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Steven Walling checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  420. Support Support Seems like a good idea. Can't see why this wouldn't be beneficial to the smaller wikis. --FlyingPenguins 03:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - FlyingPenguins checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  421. Support Support Seems to be a very reasonable proposal to me. Basket of Puppies 03:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Basket of Puppies checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  422. Support Support I'm not entirely sure whether its really necessary to give them global blocking rights, but that's not enough to make me oppose. The removal process is close to zero-tolerance, which is good. Mr.Z-man 03:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Mr.Z-man checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  423. Llakais 03:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Llakais checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  424. Paradoctor has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support If the admins go berserk, we kick them out. Meanwhile, if it promotes efficient use of our human resources aka fellow users, I'm all for it. Paradoctor 04:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Paradoctor checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  425. Support Support Hopefully will reduce vandalism, and I trust that the selection process will be thorough enough to ensure this isn't just another title people try to rack up.--BaronLarf 04:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - BaronLarf checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support I think this is a great idea. I see no reason to oppose this motion. Rintaminator 04:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Rintaminator checked by (RT) 16:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC).
  426. Grandmasterka has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    EMPHATIC Support Support. This is a long overdue solution to the abuse of small projects. Grandmasterka 04:29, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Grandmasterka checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  427. Support Support. I hope that this will reduce vandalism, while protections mentioned will prevent abuse. Tigerhawkvok 04:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible Meets eligibility criteria; no unified login, but link provided - Tigerhawkvok checked by (RT) 22:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC).
  428. Very much in Support Support of this proposal. This way, there would be less spam and suspicious activity in the wikis. wishfulanthony 05:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Wishfulanthony checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  429. Support Support Jclemens 05:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jclemens checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  430. Support Support Tm93 05:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC) Small wikis need experienced "sysops" to help them grow.
    Eligible Eligible - Tm93 checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Rudyramjet I am relativly new to the Wiki experiance and I appreciate it when I'm questioned. The steward has always told me why something is supect and what steps are needed to unblock or validate information. I contribute but certainly don't want this project tainted. The reason I contribute is because I believe in the free exchange of solid, verifiable information. We should try this out gang. If it turns into what is "feared" than do like what we are doing now and change it again! To do nothing is not the answer. 17:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Rudyramjet checked by (RT) 16:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC).
  431. Support Support Sensible way to help small wikisJohn Quiggin 05:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - John Quiggin checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  432. Sirozha has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support nice practise for small wikis --Sirozha 05:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Sirozha checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  433. Support Support Ozob 06:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Ozob checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  434. Dcoetzee has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support My own experience with Mediawiki-based projects has taught me that some projects require time to reach the critical mass of volunteers needed to sustain it. These fledgling projects require careful care and watchfulness to grow into mature ones. To abandon the small wikis would be analogous to deleting all stubs. Dcoetzee 06:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Dcoetzee checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  435. Support Support As long as projects can opt-out, I think there is little damage that can be done and a lot of help that could be offered. -- Onee 06:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Onee checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  436. Quiddity 06:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Quiddity checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  437. Graeme Bartlett has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support only purpose is to assist. Graeme Bartlett 06:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Graeme Bartlett checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  438. Brücke-Osteuropa has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support -- Brücke-Osteuropa 06:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Brücke-Osteuropa checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  439. Woraponboonkerd has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support -- Worapon B. talk 06:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Woraponboonkerd (Worapon B.) checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  440. EVula has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Easiest choice I've made all day. Absolutely. EVula // talk // ☯ // 06:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - EVula checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --Tholau Definitly YES 087:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC) :)
    Only 1 edit (this vote). Erik Warmelink 09:31, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. Insufficient edits, see here and also here - Tholau checked by (RT) 23:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC).
  441. .snoopy. has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support --.snoopy. ✉ 07:33, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - .snoopy. checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  442. Orderinchaos has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support --Orderinchaos 07:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Orderinchaos checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  443. Support Support --JohnMarcelo 07:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - JohnMarcelo checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  444. Support Support --newspaperman 07:38, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Newspaperman checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  445. Support Support Makes sense -- this will help the smaller projects. --MCB 07:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - MCB checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  446. Support Support Needed it for years. Biem 07:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Biem checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  447. --Revvar 07:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Revvar checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  448. Maedin has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support Main opposes seem to be: "they won't know the languages" and "will abuse power". I'm impressed with how confident people are that a few people can control several wikis without having any of the language skills. Clearly a steward and maintenance type role that will benefit smaller wikis and hopefully help them grow; and responding to opposes about focus taken from larger projects: I'm quite ready for en wikipedia and other large wikipedias to take a back seat to other parts of the Wikimedia Foundation; as I see it, greater involvement in the smaller projects naturally enhances the quality and quantity of information lacking from the larger projects anyway. Maedin\talk 08:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Maedin checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --2thuriel 08:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible for voting. John Vandenberg 16:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see also here) - 2thuriel checked by (RT) 19:35, 15 February 2010 (UTC).
  449. Support Support --Klaws 08:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Klaws checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  450. Support Support --Starwiz 08:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible Meets eligibility criteria; no unified login, but link provided - Starwiz checked by (RT) 22:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC).
  451. Suppport Ged UK 08:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Ged UK checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  452. Gabriel Kielland has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support -- Gabriel Kielland 08:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Gabriel Kielland checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  453. --Eriklindroos 08:46, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Eriklindroos checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  454. Clem23 has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Clem23 08:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Clem23 checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  455. Support Support -- Andre315 08:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Andre315 checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  456. Support Support Pipedreamergrey 08:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC) I'm all for anything that will foster a sense of community among the smaller wikis.
    Eligible Eligible - Pipedreamergrey checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  457. Leolaursen is a sysop on a wiki which will be affected
    Support Support Leolaursen 08:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Leolaursen checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  458. Physchim62 has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support Physchim62 09:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Physchim62 checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  459. Support Support There's no reason to deny it. - Ellif 09:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Galadrien (Ellif) checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  460. Support Support Don't think this needs to be a different permission than the existing ones, but someone should get those rights, I agree. -- Windharp 09:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Windharp checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  461. Redagavimas is a sysop on an wiki which will be affected
    Support Support --Redagavimas 09:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Redagavimas checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  462. Stifle has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support Stifle 09:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Stifle checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  463. Support Support --Patangel 09:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible At the time of your vote, you had been registered for 3 months (see here) as specified in the multilingual header of this page. However a contested view is that registation should be 1 October 2009 (shown here) - Patangel checked by (RT) 21:44, 3 February 2010 (UTC).
  464. Support Support Mpadowadierf 09:29, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Mpadowadierf checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  465. Murgh has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support Murgh 09:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Murgh checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  466. Altenmann has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support Altenmann 09:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Altenmann checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Bschandramohan
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Bschandramohan checked by (RT) 18:55, 12 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Ahmad87
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (although number of edits on fa wiki now exceeds that, see here) - Ahmad87 checked by (RT) 18:55, 12 February 2010 (UTC).
  467. Cryngo has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support Cryngo 09:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Cryngo checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  468. Vladimir Solovjev has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support--Vladimir Solovjev 09:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Vladimir Solovjev checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  469. Pjoef has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support Yes, it's a good idea. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 09:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Pjoef checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  470. Support Support --Akkifokkusu 10:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Akkifokkusu checked by (RT) 23:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC).
  471. Support Support--Bdell555 10:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Bdell555 checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  472. Support Support Nobbipunktcom 10:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Nobbipunktcom checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Archandha 11:10, 8 January 2010 (MET)
    Sorry, you are ineligible for voting. John Vandenberg 16:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see also here) - Archandha checked by (RT) 19:35, 15 February 2010 (UTC).
  473. Support Support BabelStone 10:13, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - BabelStone checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  474. Support Support Looks like it is opt in (for larger wikis) or opt out (for smaller wikis). As such, I can't see a reason to oppose - if your local wiki doesn't like it, just opt out of it. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 10:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Philosopher checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  475. Michail has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    --Michail 10:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Michail checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  476. Support Support Gz260 10:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Gz260 checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Lemiffe 10:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC) Go for it!
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Lemiffe checked by (RT) 18:55, 12 February 2010 (UTC).
  477. Support Support TraxPlayer 11:57, 8 January 2010 (MET)
    Eligible Eligible Meets eligibility criteria; no unified login, but link provided - TraxPlayer checked by (RT) 22:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC).
  478. SVL may have contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support --SVL 11:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - SVL checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  479. Boivie has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    --Boivie 11:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC) It's a good proposal.
    Eligible Eligible - Boivie checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  480. Support SupportYeah, I'm OK with this.--Mktsay123 11:04, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Mktsay123 checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  481. Support Support MichaelSchoenitzer 11:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - MichaelSchoenitzer checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  482. Seems sensible, if you only have two or three admins on a project you can't expect them to be online 24/7, especially if the vandals are english speakers who don't necessarily operate in the same timezone. WereSpielChequers 11:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - WereSpielChequers checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    And what happens if there are only one or two admins, who only check the project on a daily basis, or even less - many only dedicate a few hours each weekend. global sysops will do all the work because it "needs" doing, except during the time those admins are around. The result is that the local admins will not be able to shape their project, and without the sense of responsibility to tend to the garden, they will walk away from the project leaving it to the global sysops who probably dont understand the language. Or, they will opt out. John Vandenberg 12:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    That would be a sound argument if global sysops did more than anti-vandalism. I hardly think blocking rampaging vandals, which is likely to be 99.9% of the work (even nonsense pages are tagged for local evaluation today rather than given to the stewards to handle), will annoy the local community. NW (Talk) 12:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    blocking rampaging vandals does not need global sysops with all of the rights of local admins and global blocking.
    The proposal currently says they will be doing "non-controversial maintenance", which is the vast majority of a local sysops duties on a small wiki. John Vandenberg 12:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    A few anti-vandal experiences that I have seen while doing SWMT work. These all require tools in addition to the block button: An editor on the Greek Wikipedia who uses multiple IPs and a script to vandalize on page over and over again. Temporary semi-protection is often used to stop this. Multiple IPs go on a mass vandal page creation, creating pages with solely obscenties. Is there really any reason to for those pages to stick around? Page-move vandalism still occurs on small projects. I would go on, but I probably shouldn't. In any case, these are not isolated incidents. These happen every week, and stewards are not always there to stop it. NW (Talk) 17:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
  483. Support Support. Not a bad idea, I think. — Qweedsa 11:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Qweedsa checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support maxkramer 11:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible for voting. John Vandenberg 16:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see also here) - Maxkramer checked by (RT) 19:35, 15 February 2010 (UTC).
  484. --Conti 12:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Conti checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  485. MacCambridge has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support MacCambridge 12:04, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - MacCambridge checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  486. Support Support --Clpo13 12:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Clpo13 checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  487. Lukas9950 has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Lukas9950 12:23, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Lukas9950 checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  488. Support Support--Spartanbu 13:27, 8 January 2010 (MET) Good idea!
    Info Note Rechecked. No unified login (see here) - link on user page is needed to verify eligibility to vote - Spartanbu checked by (RT) 02:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
  489. NoCultureIcons has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    --NoCultureIcons 12:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - NoCultureIcons checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Great idea. We do need to be careful who we elect, though. Elium2 12:44, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible for voting. John Vandenberg 16:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see also here - Elium2 checked by (RT) 19:35, 15 February 2010 (UTC).
  490. Tim Ross has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Tim Ross (talk) 12:46, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Tim Ross checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  491. Hut 8.5 has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support Hut 8.5 12:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Hut 8.5 checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  492. Support Support ...and hopefully this will be the last of any dealings with this matter. LessHeard vanU 12:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - LessHeard vanU checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  493. Support Support --Carkuni 12:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Carkuni checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Good idea -- DieterEg 13:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible for voting. John Vandenberg 16:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see also here) - DieterEg checked by (RT) 19:32, 16 February 2010 (UTC).
  494. Olaf2 has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support--Olaf2 13:06, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Olaf2 checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  495. Support Support sounds like a flexible tool to me. Pauli133 13:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Pauli133 checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  496. Usien has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support--Usien 13:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Usien checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  497. Per J.delanoy's comment below. AGK 13:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - AGK checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  498. Support Support --Samyn97 13:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Samyn97 checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  499. Support Support Tinucherian 13:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Tinucherian checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Dprabhu 13:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible for voting. John Vandenberg 16:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see also here) - Dprabhu checked by (RT) 23:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC).
  500. Vajotwo has contributed to wikis which will be affected
    Support Support --Vajotwo (posta) 13:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Vajotwo checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    annotation finishes here
  501. Support Support CillanXC 13:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible Meets eligibility criteria; no unified login, but link provided - CillanXC checked by (RT) 22:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC).
  502. --Bahnmoeller 13:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Bahnmoeller checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Shaktal
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You do not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project and at the time of voting you had not been registered for at least 3 months. --(RT) 23:48, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  503. Support Support--Иван Прихно 13:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Иван Прихно checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  504. Support Support : We need men of good will to protect small projects. These small projects, viable or not, are useful to readers. Stephane8888 13:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Stephane8888 checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  505. Support Support. Yes indeed! -- OlEnglish 14:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - OlEnglish checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  506. Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support That'll be good for smaller Wikis --231013-a 14:06, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - 231013-a checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support. Anything to slow vandals -- comindico 14:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 23:40, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  507. Support Support --Jpfagerback 14:23, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jpfagerback checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  508. Support Support Makes sens. skagedal... 14:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Skagedal checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --Lankavatara 14:33, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 22:25, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  509. sounds reasonable to me -- pne 14:36, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Pne checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  510. Support Support Certainly would help the smaller wiki's. -Djsasso 14:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Djsasso checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support -- Tehbing 14:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 22:20, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  511. Support Support --Maha 15:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Maha checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  512. Support Support -- There are concerns with this, but the benefits outweigh the disadvantages I think. en:Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Oleg Alexandrov checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --Professor Muttonchops
    You are not eligible for voting. – Innv | d | s: 07:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
  513. Support Support --Oneiros 15:23, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Oneiros checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Lineplus 15:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 22:16, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
    Diyan.boyanov 15:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 22:11, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  514. Support Support There are global vandals so why not admins and difference to stewards seems somewhat sufficient. --Usp 15:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Usp checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Yes, I reckon it's needed, مر. بول مساهمات النقاش ‎ 15:35, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Info Note Rechecked. No unified login (see here) - link (with a qualifying account) is needed to verify eligibility to vote - Mr. Richard Bolla checked by (RT) 02:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
    Ineligible Not eligible Links between wiki accounts are unproven, so cannot verify eligibility to vote - a unified account or a link from Meta user page was required for identification - Mr. Richard Bolla checked by (RT) 17:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC).
  515. Support Support Mulad 15:38, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible Meets eligibility criteria; no unified login, but link provided - Mulad checked by (RT) 22:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC).
  516. Support Support - Colin dla 15:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Colindla checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  517. Good idea. --Dimitris 15:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Dimitris checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  518. Support Support yes--Alexander Timm 15:44, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Alexander Timm checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  519. Support Support We need to be as coordinated and flexible as our attackers -Drdisque 15:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible Meets eligibility criteria; no unified login, but link provided - Drdisque checked by (RT) 22:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC).
  520. Convinced that it has its place; also, the fact that wiki's can opt out of global access list makes it less likely that the bigger wiki's will have problem with global blocks. (I can't see enwiki be used on global access list, for example.) Penwhale 16:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Penwhale checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  521. Support Support Jes / Yes -- Kelkaj enesperantaj projektoj bezonas tian uzulon. / Some projects in Esperanto need these special users. -- Fernando Maia Jr. 16:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible Meets eligibility criteria; no unified login, but link provided - Fernando Maia Jr. checked by (RT) 22:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC).
  522. Support Support Perfect iniciative. --Rolf Obermaier 16:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Rolf obermaier checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  523. Support Support - Taqi Haider 16:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Taqi Haider checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  524. ×α£đes 16:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - XalD checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  525. Support Support About time that this happened. Woollymammoth 16:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Woollymammoth checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  526. Support Support but the group should be diversified and consist of people representing different countries and ideas. Otherwise, it will be the dominance of US community Alexbouditsky 16:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Alexbouditsky checked by (RT) 00:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  527. Support Support 51% support, 49% no support. A bit concerned with power abuse --Rochelimit 16:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Rochelimit checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  528. Support Support --Emericpro 16:29, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Emericpro checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Think it's definately necessary! --NorthernCounties 16:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 17:44, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
    Support SupportWe need more anti-vandals.Zoravar 16:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You do not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project and at the time of voting you had not been registered for at least 3 months. --(RT) 17:39, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  529. Support SupportDefinitely.Lewis82 16:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Lewis82 checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  530. Support Support At first I was going to come in an say hell-no, but then I read the proposals, and it's a perfectly reasonable thing to do (individual projects opt-in, and they have to be small). So hell-yes. Headbomb 16:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Headbomb checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  531. Support Support Jacoplane 16:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jacoplane checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  532. Support Support --Feudiable 16:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Feudiable checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  533. Support Support Danielkueh 16:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Info Note Rechecked. No unified login (see here) - link on user page is needed to verify eligibility to vote - Danielkueh checked by (RT) 02:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
    Eligible Eligible Rechecked. Login account now unified - Danielkueh checked by (RT) 13:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  534. Support Support Kanman 16:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Kanman checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support MMS2013 16:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). At the time of voting you had not been registered for at least 3 months. (You registered on 16 November 2009). --(RT) 17:34, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
    Support Support --Teufli 17:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 17:17, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  535. Support Support even though we should always be sceptical about sysops and their behaviour I support the effort in consolidating sysop's work like blockage of vandals as way to more efficiency and therefore more ressources to support our initial project goal - creating an encyclopedia --Manuel Schneider(bla) (+/-) 17:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - 80686 (Manuel Schneider) checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support - seems reasonable to me (Madapakar 17:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC))
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You do not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project and at the time of voting you had not been registered for at least 3 months. --(RT) 17:12, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  536. Support Support - useful and reasonable --Jfblanc 17:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jfblanc checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  537. Support Support - seems to be a good idea, to support understaffed wikis --NPunkt 17:18, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - NPunkt checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  538. Support Support - Ike9898 17:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Ike9898 checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  539. Support Support --Mordan ( talk - de - de-talk ) 17:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Mordan checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  540. Support Support. I think the ability of each project to opt in or out satisfies any concerns I would have had. --Tryptofish 17:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Tryptofish checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support -- Wikimedia needs as many able-bodies, responsible sysops in place as possible, and this plan seems to cover all eventualities thought of so far. I am in favor of the proposal, thanks for the opportunity to vote. -- Erredmek 17:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 17:07, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  541. Support Support - Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m
    Eligible Eligible Meets eligibility criteria; no unified login, but link provided - R.T.Argenton checked by (RT) 22:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC).
  542. Support Support Ironholds 17:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Ironholds checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support I agree with Headbomb. --Charlie Rrose Selavy 17:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 17:01, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  543. Support Support Galessandroni 17:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Galessandroni checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  544. --Density 17:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Density checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  545. Support Support - It's very good idea! Misiek2 17:43, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Misiek2 checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support simonexxx83 17:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). At the time of voting you had not been registered for at least 3 months. (You registered on 24 November 2009). --(RT) 16:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  546. Support Support Mlaffs 17:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Mlaffs checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support—I discuss my decision here--ArthurOgawa 17:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 16:50, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  547. Support Support —LarryGilbert 17:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - LarryGilbert checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support would make wiki so much better! akshayrangasai 23:23, 8 January 2010 (IST)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 16:46, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  548. Support Support agree Mathmo Fulldecent 18:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Fulldecent checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  549. Support Support I have become mostly inactive, due to rampant Wikipedia abuse --Gesslein 18:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Gesslein checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  550. Support Support One problem is: if a global-admin account is hacked, or someone can using it for vandalism (example: forgotten to logout, then someone use global-admin account to global-vandal) --Love Krittaya 18:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Love Krittaya checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  551. Support Support Demonwhip 18:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Demonwhip checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support I think it is a very good idea Jan Keromnes 19:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 16:42, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  552. Support Support Great idea. --Connel MacKenzie 19:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Connel MacKenzie checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Half price0 19:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 16:38, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  553. Support Support --Epiq 19:13, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Epiq checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  554. Support SupportThe Magnificent Clean-keeper 19:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - The Magnificent Clean-keeper checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  555. Annabel 19:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Annabel checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  556. Support Support--Germannoiseunion 19:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Germannoiseunion checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support--User:Tag101 19:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 16:33, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  557. Support Support--Bartiebert 19:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Bartiebert checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  558. Support Support--Mike Linksvayer 19:38, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Mike Linksvayer checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support--Charles F Ross
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 16:27, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  559. Support Support Let's try it out --Tschips 19:43, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Tschips checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  560. Support Support —Paul Erik 19:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Paul Erik checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  561. Support Support —Longbow4u 19:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Longbow4u checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Cowtung 19:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 16:22, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  562. Support Support Sins We Can't Absolve 20:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Sins We Can't Absolve checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  563. Support Support --BradPatrick 20:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - BradPatrick checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  564. Support Support --Firilăcroco discuție / talk 20:06, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Firilacroco checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  565. Nothing controversial, really. --Mormegil (cs) 20:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Mormegil checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  566. Support Support -- Pbsouthwood 20:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Pbsouthwood checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --Thekaleb 20:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 16:18, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
    Support Support --Dougcard 20:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. (If you use a different user name on other wiki projects you should have provided a link). --(RT) 16:14, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  567. Nakor 20:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Nakor checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Weak Support Support. On the one hand, there are editors like EVula who are dead impartial, a good trait for an admin on so many wikis. On the other, there are people who feign goodwill just so they can get the tool and proceed to abuse it. Plus, it's extremely powerful, which could either do good or bad, depending on whose hands it's in. I'm putting up a weak support because I'm assuming there are enough honest editors on the project to keep things under control. --Gp75motorsports 20:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project - at the time of voting your highest number of edits was 148 on Simple wiki. --(RT) 16:10, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  568. Support Support So long as the right candidates are selected, I believe this to be a positive initiative that will support the development of smaller projects. Rje 20:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Rje checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  569. --habakuk 20:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Habakuk checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  570. --Jeroen 20:38, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jeroen checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Absolutely a necessity, given the volume and scope that the wikimedia projects have evolved into! Soren42 20:42, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. Also, when you voted you had not been registered for 3 months. --(RT) 01:25, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
  571. Support Support — The Earwig @ 20:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - The Earwig checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  572. --Nro92 20:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Nro92 checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  573. --Matthiasb 20:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Matthiasb checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  574. Support Support Bob bobato 21:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Bob bobato checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  575. Support Support --Item 21:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC) of course :-)
    Eligible Eligible - Item checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  576. → crazytales 21:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Crazytales checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  577. Support Support - so long as it remains the privelege of a few, and not the right of many. GeeJo
    Eligible Eligible - GeeJo checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  578. XenonX3 21:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - XenonX3 checked by (RT) 02:26, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  579. Hercule is a sysop on two wikis which will be affected, and crat' in another affected wiki
    Support Support --Hercule 21:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Hercule checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --Sens8 21:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. (If you use a different user name on other wiki projects you should have provided a link). --(RT) 01:17, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
    Support Support --Todtanis 21:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You have not been registered for at least 3 months and do not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 23:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
  580. Support Support --AnRo0002 21:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - AnRo0002 checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --TK-CP 21:44, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You have not been registered for at least 3 months and do not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 23:49, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
  581. Support Support Per proposal. --Millosh 21:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Millosh checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --Gaumond 16:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)(My account is active on Wikipedia FR)
    <small>IP vote, login to vote pliz --[[User:Dalibor Bosits|'''<font color="Maroon" face="Bookman Old Style" size="2">D<font color=#ffcc66>alibo<font color=#FFD70 face="Bookman Old Style" size="2">r <font color="Maroon" face="Bookman Old Style" size="2">B<font color=#ffcc66>osits<font color="silver">''']] [[User_talk:Dalibor Bosits|'''<font color="black" size="3"><sup> ©</font></sup>''']] 22:06, 8 January 2010 (UTC)</small>
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. Voter was not logged in (see evidence); Gaumond did not log in to vote (see here) - 74.57.163.6, Gaumond checked by (RT) 12:49, 14 February 2010 (UTC).
  582. Support Support Jarkeld 21:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jarkeld checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  583. Support Support --Jnthn0898 22:04, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jnthn0898 checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  584. Support Support --Malafaya 22:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Malafaya checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  585. Support Support --MichaelMaggs 22:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - MichaelMaggs checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --Ondokuzmart 22:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 23:42, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
  586. Support Support HistoryStudent113 22:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - HistoryStudent113 checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  587. Support Support --Mark Nowiasz 22:28, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Mark Nowiasz checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  588. Support Support --Woodstock1 22:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Woodstock1 checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  589. Support Support --ZX81 talk 22:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - ZX81 checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  590. Support Support - I see a need, and while I see this as an imperfect solution, I have not seen a superior proposal. - Sinneed 22:36, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Sinneed checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  591. Support Support --Tone 22:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Tone checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support -- Yaztromo 22:44, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 23:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
  592. Support Support -- Btphelps 22:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Btphelps checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  593. Support Support -- Rotsee 22:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Rotsee checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  594. Support Support --ST ○ 23:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Steschke (ST) checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  595. Support Support --Church of emacs talk 23:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Church of emacs checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --Kjetil1001 23:06, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 23:34, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
  596. --Tinz 23:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Tinz checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Beccaviola 23:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 23:31, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
    Support Support --Alexanderaltman 23:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC) elegant
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 23:26, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
    {{co-firm}} --  verdanarch!  THE LOGISTICS FOR OVERIDE SEEM REASONED. Harmonic unsubverted education for all is a legacy and our future. As we grow wiser so some of us step fore and ward.
    Sorry, you are ineligible for voting. John Vandenberg 08:49, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see also here) - Verdanarch checked by (RT) 19:32, 16 February 2010 (UTC).
  597. Support Support -- Pistnor 23:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC) seems reasonable
    Eligible Eligible - Pistnor checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  598. Support Support -- CristianCantoro 23:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - CristianCantoro checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  599. Support Support - Seems like a good idea. - NeoAC 23:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Info Note Rechecked. No unified login (see here) - link on user page is needed to verify eligibility to vote - NeoAC checked by (RT) 02:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
    Eligible Eligible Rechecked. Login account now unified - NeoAC checked by (RT) 13:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  600. Support Support Hportfacts5 00:17, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Hportfacts5 checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  601. Support Support Acer 00:20, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Acer checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Weblaunches
    Ineligible Not eligible At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Weblaunches checked by (RT) 17:12, 10 February 2010 (UTC).
  602. Support Support Sure! Why not? If the doomsayers are right and a new breed of uber-wikinazi emerges as a result of this, surely our ever-watchful stewards can give them a thorough stomping. I think that people who are sufficiently interested and experienced to nominate or be naominated are unlikely to have these antisocial tendencies anyway. As in life, the bulk of the work on wiki is done by a minority of people, so more power to those that have the time and motivation. Mattopaedia Have a yarn 00:33, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Mattopaedia checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  603. Support Support Blahma 00:34, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Blahma checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  604. Support Support It sounds usefully. — Jagro (cs.wiki) 00:40, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jagro checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  605. Support Support --Evangelivm 00:42, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Evangelivm checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Publicly Visible 00:50, 9 January 2010 (UTC) Most of the naysayers seem to be either misunderstanding the proposal (e.g. the oft-overlooked "opt out") or misguidedly shouting about tyranny when many small wiki users are voting "yes". As far as I can tell, this proposal has almost everything to do with cross-wiki vandalism, and these cries for assistance from users helpless to stop cross-wiki vandals while the stewards are unavailable fill me with righteous rage! A global sysop group that doesn't have the power of stewards but can deal decisively with these insolent whelps is definitely a great idea.
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Publicly Visible checked by (RT) 12:49, 14 February 2010 (UTC).
    It seems many people represent the opposition as folks who predict pervasive tyrany, this doesn't really seem accurate and it doesn't really seem to be the thrust of their objections. The problem cited is that the potential is created, and that along with the increased complexity, responding to inevitable abuse of power becomes harder. The degree of abuse will probabl be quite minor based on my present understanding of this proposal, but who can say, especially when the means for gaining the privledge and for revoking it are still a bit unclear. The problem I see is that the wikis where this is needed will be by-definition under-policed. I would think it easier to deal with a vandal that anyone can check than a privledged user that is immune to most user's objections. So we create a class of users who will be given extraordinary powers over particularly unmoderated sites- this to me seems to be a possible problem. As for the pros of the proposal, I see no reason why more stewards can't be recruited nor why the requirements for obtaining this privledged status and the manner in which it may be used can't be modified if needed. It seems to me that if the steward program isn't working on certain sites then this program should be discussed directly. In short, the complexity, opportunity for arbitrary excercise of power in an environment with less oversight, and the unclear necessity of creating a new user class rather than simply getting more stewards or changing the nature of this user class's functions and appointment process as needed, makes me oppose the proposal, and it seems many share similar views. It isn't that prevasive abuse is foreseen, its that the need for this change is unclear and that the negatives, however slight, push many to not being able to see this proposal as a beneficial change given the readily available and well-tested alternatives (steward program expansion, modification) not having bee shown inadequate.--Δζ 05:28, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
  606. Support Support --Hormold 00:56, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Hormold checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  607. Support Support--Unionhawk 01:00, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Unionhawk checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  608. Support Support Saemikneu 01:04, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Saemikneu checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  609. Support Support There seem to be plenty of checks and balances and though there's opportunity for mistaken actions there's very little for abuse. As the Wiki projects grow so does the number of vandals and also the motivation for interested parties to play dirty tricks: we need the tool to cope. --Simonxag 01:07, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Simonxag checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  610. Support Support Hi878 01:09, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Hi878 checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Wiseguy007 01:16, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 23:22, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
    Support Support MikeLacey 01:22, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 23:19, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
    Weak Support Support. On the one hand, there are editors like EVula who are dead impartial, a good trait for an admin on so many wikis. On the other, there are people who feign goodwill just so they can get the tool and proceed to abuse it. Plus, it's extremely powerful, which could either do good or bad, depending on whose hands it's in. I'm putting up a weak support because I'm assuming there are enough honest editors on the project to keep things under control. --Gp75motorsports 20:23, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
    Duplicate vote. Davewild 15:38, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
    Support Support Sure! Why not? If the doomsayers are right and a new breed of uber-wikinazi emerges as a result of this, surely our ever-watchful stewards can give them a thorough stomping. I think that people who are sufficiently interested and experienced to nominate or be naominated are unlikely to have these antisocial tendencies anyway. As in life, the bulk of the work on wiki is done by a minority of people, so more power to those that have the time and motivation. Mattopaedia Have a yarn 00:28, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Duplicate vote. Davewild 15:38, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
    Support Support -- VanderGomes I support this project. I believe a big project like Wikipedia is necessary to consider not only the quality but also quantity to fully achieve the results.
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 23:16, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
  611. Support Support -- Tawker 00:58, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Tawker checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support -- Buckeyetigre 01:38, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Buckeyetigre checked by (RT) 17:12, 10 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --Bctrainers 02:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible At time of voting did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see here and also here) - Bctrainers checked by (RT) 17:12, 10 February 2010 (UTC).
  612. Support Support — It can be useful. Here's hoping its used for the described purposes.—DMCer 02:17, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - DMCer checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  613. Support Support, gives better fine tuning of permissions, plus there's always a place to take complaints if necessary. --Sigma 7 02:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Sigma 7 checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  614. Support Support -- Njrwally 03:29, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Njrwally checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  615. Support Support -- Jtico (talk) 02:40, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Jtico checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  616. Support Support -- Lenitha 02:44, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Lenitha checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  617. Support Support: small wikis are vulnerable to attackers, since too few people watch them if ever. Now, this would be a way to increase their defenses. Alexius08 02:42, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Alexius08 checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support -- Based on review of the previous comments and consideration of the effects on current and future users, I support the proposal to establish global sysops in effort to provide efficient and complete protection of wikis that opt-in. JShenk 02:49, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Info Note Rechecked. No unified login (see here) - link on user page is needed to verify eligibility to vote - JShenk checked by (RT) 02:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC).
    Ineligible Not eligible Links between wiki accounts are unproven, so cannot verify eligibility to vote - a unified account or a link from Meta user page was required for identification - JShenk checked by (RT) 17:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC).
  618. Support Support -- William915 02:57, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - William915 checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  619. Support Support Ottava Rima 02:59, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Ottava Rima checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  620. Support Support -- Allen4names 03:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Allen4names checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Supraphonic 03:14, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 23:12, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
  621. Support Support-Not entirely sure about some things, but I'm basically in support —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NativeTexan55 (talk)
    Eligible Eligible - NativeTexan55 checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Xam123456 03:35, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 23:08, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
    Support Support - I think it's a good idea —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Reinaldo Christopher (talk • contribs) 2010-01-09T03:49:34 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible for voting. John Vandenberg 09:01, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
    Ineligible Not eligible Rechecked. At time of voting had not been registered for 3 months and did not have a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project (see also here) - Reinaldo Christopher checked by (RT) 19:32, 16 February 2010 (UTC).
  622. Support Support This is a great idea, since certain administrators (examples: Juliancolton, PeterSymonds) help out all they can on multiple wikis of the Wikimedia Foundation. Since I read/heard about the shortage of Stewards, the global sysop group would benefit those users. DivineAlpha 03:50, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - DivineAlpha checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support Sounds like a normal delegating of responsibilities Firefight 03:50, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 23:05, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
  623. Support Support. →Lwalt ♦ talk 03:52, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - Lwalt checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
  624. Support Support. I am an admin at the English Wikipedia under this same username, but I can't help with adminstrative tasks at, say, Simple English. I would greatly enjoy the opportunity to assist in theadministrative tasks of other Foundation projects. --PMDrive1061 04:04, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Eligible Eligible - PMDrive1061 checked by (RT) 12:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC).
    Support Support --Joejoe92 04:07, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry, you are ineligible (see here and also here). You need a minimum of 150 edits on at least one project. --(RT) 22:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
  625. Support Support. The major benefit appears to be the small wikis hits by cross-wiki spammers/vandals—given that Stewards would be delegating this responsibility, the Stewards will also be in the position to remove it if the extra powers are misused. —Sladen 04:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC)