Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/Cekli829

< Stewards | Elections 2016
Warning

These steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Cekli829 (Tərxan Paşazadə)

edit
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: az-N, tr-N, cek-N, kjj-3, crh-3, gag-3, ru-2, en-2, kk-1, tt-1, tk-1 and etc.
  • Personal info: (English)
    Greetings all. Respecting tradition, I stand as a candidate again this time because the current rules allow me to become a candidate. I can assure you that after the election my action will be just as effective. You know me from previous elections. Once again I would like to inform you briefly about myself:

    I am Tarkhan Pashazade jachly, from Azerbaijan and origin from Jack village in the Quba Rayon. I’m living in Sumgait city. Date of birth: 29 November 1982.

    First time I registered in Wikipedia on 21 December, 2006 as Tərxan Paşazadə. But currently it’s inactive. Afterwards I registered on February 8, 2009 at Azerbaijani Wikipedia in the username of Cekli829. Since March 27, 2009 I have remained an active on wiki projects.

    My account is active in about 835 sites of project - almost in all of the sites. Generally, I have more than 278 000 editing on the project. Currently I'm a member of at least 19 local groups (sysop/rollbacker/test-admin/reviewer/patroller/rollbacker/editor/etc...) in the wiki-project. I made more than 44 000 sysop actions only on Azerbaijani Wikipedia. I participated to the translation project translatewiki.net as well. Especially if you notice, the Turkish Wikipedia Collaborations project, where I was an active participant in this project in 2011, 2012 and I became the winner of the year. In 2015, I became the completed of the 100wikidays (video-slide) and I be honored as Wikipedia Asian Ambassador.

    I'm also a member of the Azerbaijani Wikimedians User Group and Small Wiki Monitoring Team. I have a great practice in global struggling against vandalism. I’m initiator and participant of Azerbaijani Wikinews, Khinalig Wikipedia projects in Incubator. One of my biggest contribution from the projects was the Commons project (11.000+ file); also Wikidata.

    Wikiness is my lifestyle. I am busy on wiki projects from 1 to 5 hours in a day. I think wiki projects are the great common human worth. I want to be more helpful in this sphere. That is why I would like to serve as a Wikimedia steward. This is already the seventh time of my candidacy. Actually to be a candidate for the previous 6 elections was a great experience for me. Thus, further the elections has an important role in the improvement of my activity, forming as a professional wiki...

    Please support with your vote all of candidates who you like! I wish only the useful result. Doubtless if wikisociety will support me, I am ready to assume the responsibility. I hope wikisociety will support and will give me this honorable responsibility. Because I’m truly a hard working user. You can trust me. Thank you for your consideration!

    Additional user pages: Azerbaijani Wikipedia • Turkish Wikipedia • Commons
    Outside the project: Facebook (profile) • Facebook (page) • YouTube (channel)
    Note: You can also see the presentation I am preparing: Wikipedia: The perfect venue!
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#Cekli829


  Yes

edit
  1. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I keep don't seeing the “problem”. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Serkanland (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Serk@nl@nd 14:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Shahrux (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Shahrux (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Keete 37 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Keete 37 (Farid Aliev) (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. TeriEmbrey (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Support! TeriEmbrey (talk) 14:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Holder (talk) 15:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Farsizabon (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Farsizabon (talk) 15:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Roland Kutzki (talk) 15:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Sefer azeri (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Sefer azeri (talk) 15:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Araz Yaquboglu (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Araz Yaquboglu (talk) 15:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Yusif Sərrac (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Yusif Sərrac (talk) 15:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Sabuhi from Baku (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Sabuhi from Baku (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. axpde (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  a×pdeHello! 16:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Arbnos (talk) 16:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Kopiersperre (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Kopiersperre (talk) 16:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Akil13 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Akil13 (talk) 17:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Okanfan (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  -- Okanfan (talk) 17:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Sevimleribo (talk) 17:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Deryck Chan (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Sure, why not. Go ahead. Deryck C. 17:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Namikilisu (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Namikilisu (talk) 17:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Nrautava (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. LavaBaron (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  LavaBaron (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Ejensyd (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ejensyd (talk) 18:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Crispus (Not eligible, checked by Stryn) •  Crispus (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Mecnun112 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Mecnun112 (talk) 19:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Samral (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Samral (talk) 19:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Aguzer (Not eligible, checked by Stryn) •  Azerbaycan ve Türkiye Vikileri için iyi bir köprü olur. --This unsigned article written by: User:Aguzer 19:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Touzrimounir (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Touzrimounir (talk) 19:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Mar del Este (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Mar del Este:)안녕하세요 (talk) 22:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Sortilegus (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Sortilegus (talk) 22:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Әмир (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Әмир (talk) 23:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Prof tpms (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Good candidate Prof tpms (talk) 23:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Eman235 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Eman235/talk 23:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. HakanIST (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  HakanIST (talk) 00:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Zeljko (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  SQLQuery me! 00:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Omerlaziale (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Omerlaziale (talk) 01:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  HalanTul (talk) 02:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Kindly, block should not be a reason to oppose Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Yash! 04:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Azerifactory (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Azerifactory (talk) 04:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Gokhantig (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Azerbaijan candır.. Gokhantig (talk) 08:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Henky Yoga (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Henky Yoga (talk) 09:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. OSMAN4466 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  --OSMAN4466 (talk) 10:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Babymissfortune (talk) 11:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Jamesmcmahon0 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 11:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Deb (talk) 12:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Fil211 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Fil211 (talk) 12:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Ellery (talk) 13:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Ochilov (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Ochilov (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. KediÇobanı (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  KediÇobanı🐈 17:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Sodeif (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Sodeif (talk) 18:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  CLCStudent (talk) 18:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Erne Mogilevich (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  I think your various knowledge of languages matches perfectly with the Steward flag. Erne る Mogilevich (ノート • 投稿記録) 23:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Katz191 (Not eligible, checked by Alexmar983) •  Katz191 (talk) 23:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone) •  Risk Engineer (talk) 00:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. VanEman (Eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)2016 •  VanEman (talk) 05:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Vago (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Vago tp 06:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Rutulec (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Rutulec (talk) 07:08, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Fikir Mühendisi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Fikir Mühendisi (talk) 10:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Gulnar Rehimli (Not eligible, checked by shanmugamp7) •  Gulnar Rehimli (talk) 10:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Chairmanbka (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  Chairmanbka (talk) 12:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Veleius
  58. Zotezangu (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Zotezangu (talk) 15:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Alp Er Tunqa (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Alp Er Tunqa (talk) 16:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Demidenko (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Demidenko 17:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Bdscvr (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Bdscvr (talk) 17:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Drzewianin (talk) 19:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  MelanieN (talk) 22:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Obelix (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Obelix (talk) 22:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Olsi (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Olsi (talk) 23:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Melikov Memmed (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  He is an experienced Wikipedia editor Melikov Memmed (talk) 05:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Omarali1212 (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  Omarali1212 (talk) 06:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Aabdullayev851 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Aabdullayev851 (talk) 06:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  İncelemeelemani (talk) 14:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. 아름불휘 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Not Problem! Areumbulhwi (talk/profile) 15:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Tyytoo (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Tyytoo (talk) 15:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Qolcomaq (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016 •  Qolcomaq (talk) 05:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Clivemacd (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Clivemacd (talk) 10:54, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016 •  I think he should be given a chance since this is his second time Rberchie (talk) 11:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 23:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Xoegki (Eligible, checked by 范)2016 •  Xoegki (talk) 04:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Wikibenchris (talk) 11:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Munci (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  Munci (talk) 14:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Nick2crosby (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  <optional comments>. Nick2crosby (talk) 16:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Walber (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Walber (talk) 21:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Hampcky (talk) 23:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       PokestarFan (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  PokestarFan (talk) (My Contribs) 01:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. SEVEREN (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  SEVEREN (talk) 03:04, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Invertiert (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Invertiert (talk) 09:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Rusty1111 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Rusty1111 (talk) 10:09, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016 •  Gag0409 (talk) 13:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Seedorfjohnny (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Seedorfjohnny (talk) 16:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Азербайджан-е-Джануби (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Азербайджан-е-Джануби (talk) 17:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Knowledgebattle (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Knowledgebattle (talk) 01:20, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Spasage (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Spasage (talk) 06:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Zaur Turan(1994) (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  Zaur Turan(1994) (talk) 08:15, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Nassauer27 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Nassauer27 (talk) 10:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Fraxinus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Fraxinus (talk) 12:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Magawla61 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Magawla61 (talk) 13:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Antoine.01 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Antoine.01 (talk) 14:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Liridon (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Liridon (talk) 21:24, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Fadesga (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Very interesting profile! Fadesga (talk) 23:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       WikiHelper2134 (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  WikiHelper2134 (talk) 02:38, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       LordHello1 (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  LordHello1 (talk) 06:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Sebleouf (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Sebleouf (talk) 08:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Kaftaj (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Kaftaj (talk) 09:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Aydinsalis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Dear colleagues. Wikipedia in the Azerbaijani language, in poor condition. Many complaints had not been dealt with. Meta also does not address our complaints ([1], [2] ). There must be at least 1 steward. Disgrace, how long will it last? --Idin Mammadof 14:38, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Elmeddin82 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Elmeddin82 (talk) 15:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Emin • message 15:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  101. AdiMind (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  AdiMind (talk) 18:05, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Hollingsworth (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Hollingsworth (talk) 21:36, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 22:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  103. WiseWoman (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016 •  --WiseWoman (talk) 10:58, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  104. ITPRO.UZ (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  ITPRO.UZ (talk) 11:48, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Boboseiptu (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Boboseiptu (talk) 12:33, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Taigatrommel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Taigatrommel (talk) 20:15, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  107. عثمان منصور انصاري (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  عثمان منصور انصاري (talk) 20:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Kapohogrrl (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Kapohogrrl (talk) 05:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Hawajez (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Hayır olsun.. Paşazade :) Hawajez (talk) 08:05, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Yoldasso (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  His contributes that in turkic languages will be helpful. Go ahead cekliYoldasso (talk) 09:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  109. SideshowBob7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  SideshowBob7 (talk) 12:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Xatian11968 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Xatian11968 (talk) 17:17, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Георгий Суворов (Not eligible, checked by Defender) •  Георгий Суворов (talk) 18:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Şeyx Şamil (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  --Şeyx Şamil (talk) 18:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Mirer (talk) 19:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Octahedron80 (talk) 13:22, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  114. YALIN BALTA (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Yes. YALIN BALTA (talk) 14:53, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Nebydlogop (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Nebydlogop (talk) 14:59, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Vusal1981 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  --Vusal1981 (talk) 19:16, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Jusjih (talk) 00:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Cosine02 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Stang 05:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Pratyeka (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Good work. Pratyeka (talk) 06:27, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Csisc (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  --Csisc (talk) 10:43, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       FirstDrop87 (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  FirstDrop87 (talk) 13:18, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Billytanghh (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016 •  Billytanghh (talk) 17:00, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Coolland (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Coolland (talk) 18:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Amaling (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Amaling (talk) 19:48, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Gilthuanas (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Gilthuanas (talk) 22:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Proger (Not eligible, checked by Alexmar983) •  Proger danış 23:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Goombiis (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Goombiis (talk) 00:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Archi38 (Not eligible, checked by Defender) •  Archi38 (talk) 07:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Aussie Oc (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Aussie Oc (talk) 11:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  124. BluesyPete (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  BluesyPete (talk) 17:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Nhfflkh (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Nhfflkh (talk) 18:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Höyhens (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Höyhens (talk) 23:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       BRPever (Not eligible, checked by Stryn) •  BRP ever 18:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Kadavr2000 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Kadavr2000 (talk) 18:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Öterbülbül (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Öterbülbül (talk) 22:09, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 23:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Bogger (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Bogger (talk) 08:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Stephen Allcroft (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Stephen Allcroft (talk) 18:16, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Mhj973 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Mhj973 (talk) 01:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  131. PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 09:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Lutzv (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Lutzv (talk) 11:20, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  133. La femme de menage (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  --La femme de menage (talk) 09:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  134. NoychoH (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  NoychoH (talk) 12:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Eltargrim (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Eltargrim (talk) 15:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Romayan (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Romayan (talk) 21:41, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Dimitra megest (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Dimitra megest (talk) 01:47, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  137. J7729 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  J7729 (talk) 08:43, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Proektir (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Proektir (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  138. BORGATO Pierandrea (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  BORGATO Pierandrea (talk) 18:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Bigs7 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Bigs7 (talk) 18:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Bernd Bergmann (talk) 19:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Jaumellecha (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Jaumellecha (talk) 23:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Çalıştay (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I know that Cekli829 is a hardworking Wikipedians. Çalıştay (talk) 08:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  142. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  — X-Javier ✉ [m'écrire] 12:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Not this year. --Vogone (talk) 14:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  It is impossible to solve the problem. It's too early. --MF-W 14:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Herby talk thyme 14:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  You are our WikiCaprio. Please continue. — T. 14:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  This is the 7th time, right? Southparkfan 14:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Not at all convinced by the users' answers to the questions. Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Gereon K. (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  No, no and no.--Steinsplitter (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. GeoO (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  No. --geo ») 14:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ulflarsen (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  No. This is becoming more and more of a face. Natuur12 (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Mahdy Saffar (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  No. Mahdy Saffar (talk) 15:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 15:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ran as a candidate in the last six elections unsuccessfully, and still gives evasive and incorrect answers to voter questions. No way I would trust them with private information. Rschen7754 15:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Jahaza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Seems to be getting POINTy --Jahaza (talk) 15:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Vadgt (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Or no or neutral. I choose no. Vadgt (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Clear no. And this is not just about Armenian/Azerbaijani problem, but also about answers to the questions. For instance, being asked about data stored in CUwiki he answered I am in favor of open information. But with respect to security issues, I think it is imperative to remain confidential for a certain period. This means that he either did not understand the question (which is a big problem for a steward) or could not write a meaningful answer in English (which is a big problem either). I don't even know which of these two options is worse — NickK (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 16:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Ganímedes (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Ganímedes (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Per NickK[reply]
  20. மதனாஹரன் (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Mathanaharan (talk) 17:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Widr (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. ArthurPSmith (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Seems like an active user but I don't see a clear case made for this particular position. ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  per Rschen7754 and NickK Armbrust (talk) 18:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Lsanabria (talk) 20:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Wolmar (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Per Rschen7754 Wolmar (talk) 20:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Murma174 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Murma174 (talk) 21:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  ChristophThomas (talk) 21:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Round and round and round and around we go... Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  White Master (es) 22:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  User still has several and serious problems of understanding our processes. Cannot handle his own requests for sysop rights. And that does not change with time. Could never properly address the canvassing accusations raised on previous candidacy. Actually, I could never see a question properly addressed by him, whose answers are close to sarcasm. Terrible reasoning to become a steward on statement. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hubertl (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       WikiMichel (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  WikiMichel (talk) 00:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Checkingfax (talk) 02:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  eurodyne (talk) 02:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Legoktm (talk) 03:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Concerns over the past few elections are unfortunately still present Jianhui67 talk★contribs 05:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. MarchHare1977 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  MarchHare1977 (talk) 05:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  The seventh time in a row. Really?! Jasper Deng (talk) 07:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Albero (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  --Albero (talk) 09:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  David1010 (talk) 12:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Gimmy dd (talk) 12:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. ԱշոտՏՆՂ (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  thank you for your interest to serve as a steward ԱշոտՏՆՂ (talk) 12:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Trijnsteltalk 13:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  DCB (talk) 17:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Banaticus (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  Banaticus (talk) 17:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Ernstol (talk) 20:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Bikarhêner (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Bikarhêner (talk) 20:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Taivo (talk) 20:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       AirCombat (Not eligible, checked by Alexmar983) •  sorry... en-2 not quite good enough. Some parts seem auto-translated. AirCombat (talk) 23:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Gorlingor (talk) 01:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. OrbiliusMagister (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  His skill in English has improved indeed in the last four years, but his answers to the questions are still too worrying. If it is impossible to solve the problem... it's too early. - εΔω 07:33, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  50. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Sorry, after more than 5 years, still no improvement or experiences has been made. You need to solve your own problems first very seriously before you can run again. cyrfaw (talk) 11:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  one of the creations of this user Mathmensch (talk) 12:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Insufficient answers and overly broad statements. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Gomada (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Gomada (talk) 21:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Numbermaniac (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  -- numbermaniac 22:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Waka Waka (talk) 00:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Jonathunder (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Perennial candidate Jonathunder (talk) 03:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. -revi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  — regards, Revi 03:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Vfrickey (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  I don't think the answers in azerbaijani were helpful to me or other English-language editors who needed to know what the answers to the English-language questions were. And I'm worried about the nationalism question, too, and evasive answers to progress since last candidacy. loupgarous (talk) 03:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  –Ejs-80 08:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Technopat (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Technopat (talk) 09:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Barras (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  I personally consider your ongoing and failing candidatures for stewardship a waste of the valued time of our community. I don't think you really understand the steward business at all. It looks to me like you are not actually learning from your past failed requests. -Barras talk 13:00, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  FASTILY 08:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Snaevar (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  no global rights, answers to questions from the steward election last year indicate lack of knowledge when it comes to policies.--Snaevar (talk) 19:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  No enough experiences. Eager Lin (Message) 05:14, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. B25es (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  B25es (talk) 09:44, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Carlotm (talk) 04:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Fuxx (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016 •  Fuxx (talk) 18:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Shanmugamp7 (talk) 19:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  NaBUru38 (talk) 19:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Az1568 (talk) 02:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  – Meiræ 12:49, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. POLNET55 (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  POLNET55 (talk) 15:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Pgallert (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Pgallert (talk) 18:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Rax (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Rax (talk) 20:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC) your answers on the question page don't seem adequate[reply]
  75. Thogo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  თოგო (D) 23:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Gonzo.Lubitsch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  --Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 07:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Hemeier (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Hemeier (talk) 10:25, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Vonoserbizky Spartacus (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 11:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Looking forward to your next year's candidacy. SPQRobin (talk) 11:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       VisaBlack (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  You must have the Rick Perry problem. So many elections, so many loses. Have to go with the past voters on this one. VisaBlack (talk) 13:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  While being the xth candidature is not a problem for me, the issues raised by others (e.g NickK) are bothersome. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Ringbang (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ringbang (talk) 21:32, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Courcelles 22:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Berlin-George (talk) 00:41, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  84. CaZeRillo (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  CaZeRillo (talk) 09:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Mehran (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  ● Mehran Debate 11:34, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Avraham (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  I remain uncomfortable with the statement and the answers to the questions. Avi (talk) 21:24, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  While the candidate has made some 15 edits to Wikiversities in the past, there's none in more than a year. --Marshallsumter (talk) 15:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Qewr4231 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Qewr4231 (talk) 21:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. VIGNERON (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Still not convinced... Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 12:51, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. P.T. Aufrette (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  P.T. Aufrette (talk) 18:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Kumkum (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  "Respecting tradition". Kumʞum quoi ? 20:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. NicatronTg (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  NicatronTg (talk) 03:03, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  KTo288 (talk) 08:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Ex13 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Ex13 (talk) 13:31, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  94. 콩가루 (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  콩가루 (talk) 14:42, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Wikifreund (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016 •  --Wikifreund (talk) 16:48, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Mathonius (Eligible, checked by Atcovi)2016 •  Mathonius (talk) 19:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Timothycrice (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Timothycrice (talk) 20:43, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Tonton Bernardo (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Not very active lately. Let's better say No Tonton Bernardo (talk) 08:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Popo le Chien (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Not impressed by the answers given. Sorry. Maybe next time ^^ Popo le Chien (talk) 10:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Maleine258 (talk) 13:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  101. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 14:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  102. DerekvG (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  --DerekvG (talk) 16:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Wetterwolke (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Wetterwolke (talk) 19:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  104. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  DangSunM (talk) 20:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  —Ah3kal (talk) 08:55, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       CrazyD (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  CrazyD (talk) 10:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Timk70 question? 21:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Tom29739 (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  You weren't successful in past years, and I don't think you've improved enough to become a steward yet. Tom29739 (talk) 22:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  again your answers don't result persuasive Harlock81 (talk) 22:28, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Tegel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Tegel (Talk) 08:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  109. The Traditionalist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  The Traditionalist (talk) 13:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Glaisher (talk) 16:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Glane23 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Geoff Who, me? 22:11, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Styko (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Styko (talk) 06:48, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Bmhs823 (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  Bmhs823 (talk) 08:15, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  114. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  The Banner (talk) 14:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Hobbamock (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Hobbamock (talk) 14:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Deinocheirus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Edits in Russian Wikipedia are not particularly convincing. Deinocheirus (talk) 15:49, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  117. ContributorQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Too shallow motivations --ContributorQ (talk) 18:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Vachovec1 (talk) 01:22, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Lawrencedepe (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Lawrencedepe (talk) 08:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Brejnev (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Same opinion as Rschen7754 and NickK. Brejnev (talk) 14:48, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Varina (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Varina (talk) 16:47, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Imbericle (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Imbericle (talk) 23:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Defrenrokorit (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Defrenrokorit (talk) 05:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I am still uncertain about Cekli's interest in Stewardship, as his answers to questions and highlighting of numerical data in his statement leave me with much the wrong impression. Snowolf How can I help? 07:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  I'm afraid that user still needs time. Cause his answers are not "good" to become a steward and with this knowledge of him, I would fear him with the steward tools. Maybe next time..... Pratyya (Hello!) 12:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Ireas (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  Ireas (talk) 13:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  126. .js (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  .js[democracy needed] 13:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Żyrafał (talk) 15:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I appreciate diversity, but the five previous unsuccessful elections put me here. Miniapolis 16:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Reguyla (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Reguyla (talk) 17:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Alan (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Flyingfischer (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  OlEnglish (Talk) 19:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Mscuthbert (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Mscuthbert (talk) 19:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Derekitou (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  Derekitou (talk) 03:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Vinckie (talk) 12:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  I believe that candidate's efforts are best served outside of stewardry, though not enough to vote against.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  He isn't much active globally. --Uğurkenttalk 16:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Ghiutun 22:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  I appreciate your persistency, but I don't think it's the right time yet, I'm afraid. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 02:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Infinite0694 (Talk) 11:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Shangkuanlc (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016 •  Liang(WMTW) (talk) 11:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Rahmanuddin (talk) 15:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Fernando2812l (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Fernando2812l (talk) 19:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Nannadeem (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  This is the best way for his candidature Nannadeem (talk) 06:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 07:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  GZWDer (talk) 19:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  This candidate is active, but I am not sure how qualified he is. Wpollard (talk) 02:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Kusurija (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Not sure. Maybe in next election? --Kusurija (talk) 20:05, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Pradeepabk (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Pradeepabk (talk) 11:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Fordmadoxfraud (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Ford MF (talk) 06:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Titodutta (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Tito Dutta (talk) 00:21, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Euphoria42 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Euphoria42 (talk) 02:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Ananth subray (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Ananth subray (talk) 12:55, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  VictorBrice (talk) 20:32, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Vimaparo147 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Vimaparo147 (talk) 11:10, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Bio06940 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Bio06940 (talk) 12:11, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Neolexx (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  NeoLexx (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Mazuritz (talk) 10:59, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Dbastro (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Dbastro (talk) 15:50, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ysjbserver (talk) 07:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Nnemo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Nnemo (talk) 13:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2016/Votes/Cekli829&oldid=25313095"