Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/Érico

< Stewards‎ | Elections 2016
Warning

These steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Érico edit

ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: pt-N, en-2, es-2
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello everyone. I'm Érico from Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil and I would like to serve as steward.

    I started contributing on Wikimedia projects in April 2010 at the Portuguese Wikipedia, where I become a sysop in January 2012, a bureaucrat in April 2012 and a CheckUser in March 2015. Although isn't a mandatory process in my home wiki, I passed in two confirmations (I & II).

    In early 2012, I joined the Small Wiki Monitoring Team (SWMT) and since then I work in antivandalism-related tasks. In May 2012 I was approved as global rollbacker, and, in December of the same year, as global sysop. I'm also a sysop on Commons and a global renamer. In February 2014, I left to contribute in some projects due to student issues, but I came back to stay active in December 2014.

    I'm easily contactable by my email and talk page, as well in the IRC sometimes. If elected as steward, I intend to handle with SRG, SRP and SRCU requests. Furthermore, I believe that the tools can help me more quickly and easily to deal with LTAs and cross-wiki vandalisms.

    I agree to abide by the steward policy, as well its related policies (Privacy, CheckUser and Oversight). If you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to ask them. Thank you for your time and consideration. Érico (talk) 04:35, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#Érico


  Yes edit

  1. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I found your profile interessant. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Southparkfan 14:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Gereon K. (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. TeriEmbrey (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Support! TeriEmbrey (talk) 14:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Holder (talk) 15:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Experienced SWMT member. Good luck. RadiX∞ 15:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Good crosswiki experience, good experience with CU, easy to work with. Frankly, I think the Commons community missed out on a good potential CU. Rschen7754 15:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Żyrafał (talk) 15:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       GodeNehler (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  GodeNehler (talk) 16:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Gato Preto (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Gato Preto (talk) 17:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Biologo32 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Márcio Muniz What's up? 17:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Flyingfischer (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Alan (talk) 18:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Are you freaking kidding me (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Are you freaking kidding me (talk) 18:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Competent OlEnglish (Talk) 19:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Antero de Quintal (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Antero de Quintal (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Petronas (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Petronas (talk) 19:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Maragm (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Maragm (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. TuCove (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Like that you are in South America. We need diversity. TuCove (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Hypergio (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  НУРшЯGIO(beware of the moose) 20:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Wolmar (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Wolmar (talk) 20:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Mar del Este (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  intrigued. Go ahead. Mar del Este:)안녕하세요 (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  White Master (es) 22:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Per Rschen7754. Has been using all rights he requested so far. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Prof tpms (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Candidate with good potential Prof tpms (talk) 23:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Eman235 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Eman235/talk 23:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  SQLQuery me! 00:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per Rschen7754. User has the right experience — NickK (talk) 01:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  The pros weigh out the cons here eurodyne (talk) 02:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Sure. Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Yash! 04:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Jim Carter (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Jim Carter (talk) 06:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Ruthven (talk) 11:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Babymissfortune (talk) 11:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Assianir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Assianir (talk) 11:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  David1010 (talk) 12:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  I am willing to give Érico a chance Jianhui67 talk★contribs 12:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Ellery (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Has advanced tools and no known mistakes; may have a low presentation, though competence, trust and teamwork is what is needed.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Might be young, yes, but he's competent and trusted. So per Rschen7754 and Billinghurst. Trijnsteltalk 13:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Arnoldus9 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  competent. Arnoldus9 (talk) 13:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 13:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Fernando2812l (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Fernando2812l (talk) 17:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Zeljko (talk) 17:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Enirack (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Enirack (talk) 17:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  CLCStudent (talk) 18:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Belanidia (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Belanidia (talk) 19:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Ghiutun 22:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Fasouzafreitas (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Fasouzafreitas (talk) 22:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone) •  Welcome! Risk Engineer (talk) 00:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Jarould (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jarould (talk) 01:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Edmenb (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Edmenb ( Mensajes ) Wikipedia en Español 01:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Jrt989 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jrt989 (talk) 02:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jon Harald Søby (talk) 02:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Sj (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Yes. –SJ talk  06:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Carshalton (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Carshalton (talk) 09:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  cyrfaw (talk) 12:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Defender (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Defender (talk) 12:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Assuming good faith. — T. 13:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. M.Tarnowski (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  M.Tarnowski (talk) 16:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Capella87 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Capella87 (talk) 16:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Rxy (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  rxy (talk) 17:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Marcelo Victor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Mvictor talk 18:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Drzewianin (talk) 19:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Discussed with others. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. L'editeur (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  L'editeur (talk) 22:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Obelix (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Obelix (talk) 22:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Darwinius (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Trustworthy. - Darwin Ahoy! 00:39, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. White whirlwind (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  White whirlwind (talk) 01:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  –Ejs-80 08:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Tucoxn (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  - tucoxn\talk 13:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Barras (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  I really dislike the fact that an apparently competent, active and clueful candidate is being opposed because he's potentially young. I'd consider this ageism. He's clearly a suitable candidate, no matter how old he is. -Barras talk 14:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Rahmanuddin (talk) 15:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. FriedC (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  FriedC (talk) 16:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Syum90 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Syum90 (talk) 18:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Jan Kovář BK (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2016 •  Jan KovářBK (talk) 18:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. INeverCry (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016 •  INeverCry 23:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Ricardo Ferreira de Oliveira (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016 •  Trustworthy and competent Ricardo Ferreira de Oliveira (talk) 00:06, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Erne Mogilevich (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Excellent candidate. Erne Mogilevich (ノート) 00:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Rauletemunoz (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •    Rauletemunoz 03:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  FASTILY 08:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016 •  Rberchie (talk) 11:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Lucas Landin (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Lucas Landin (talk) 16:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Snaevar (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  trustworthy imo.--Snaevar (talk) 19:16, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. ~Expresses life (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ok :) まSan [T•C•ES] 21:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       CourtlyHades296 (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  CourtlyHades296 (talk) 23:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 23:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Chronus (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Chronus (talk) 00:06, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Xoegki (Eligible, checked by 范)2016 •  Xoegki (talk) 04:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Eager Lin (Message) 05:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Wikibenchris (talk) 11:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. AMPERIO (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  AMPERIO (talk) 12:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Jeff alef (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Jeff alef (talk) 14:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. DanielTom (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  DanielTom (talk) 15:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Bya97 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Bya97 (talk) 02:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Infinite0694 (Talk) 03:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Carlotm (talk) 04:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  97. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  B20180 (talk) 05:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Nannadeem (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Nannadeem (talk) 07:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •    Support Ferran Mir (talk) 08:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016 •  Gag0409 (talk) 14:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Seedorfjohnny (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Seedorfjohnny (talk) 16:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Dbastro (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Dbastro (talk) 19:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  103. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  NaBUru38 (talk) 19:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Knowledgebattle (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Knowledgebattle (talk) 01:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Az1568 (talk) 02:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  – Meiræ 12:22, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Fraxinus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Fraxinus (talk) 12:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Antoine.01 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Antoine.01 (talk) 14:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Thogo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  თოგო (D) 23:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  The questions asked were brutal, but they appeared to be answered honestly. Wpollard (talk) 02:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Taichi (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Taichi - (あ！) 06:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Snow Rise (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Snow Rise (talk) 07:05, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Gonzo.Lubitsch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 07:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Sebleouf (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Sebleouf (talk) 08:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Morza (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Morza (sono qui) 11:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Vonoserbizky Spartacus (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 11:41, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       VisaBlack (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  VisaBlack (talk) 13:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Saehrimnir (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Saehrimnir (talk) 13:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  118. AdiMind (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  AdiMind (talk) 18:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Hollingsworth (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Hollingsworth (talk) 21:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Vanthorn (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Vanthorn (talk) 03:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  120. GRS73 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  GRS73 (talk) 04:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Ankry (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ankry (talk) 07:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  122. LEANSER (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  LEANSER (talk) 17:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Tufor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  ok tufor (talk) 18:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Matiia (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Matiia (talk) 18:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  125. عثمان منصور انصاري (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  عثمان منصور انصاري (talk) 20:16, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  126. OnlyJonny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  OnlyJonny (talk) 03:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Kapohogrrl (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Kapohogrrl (talk) 05:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  127. HCa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  HCa (talk) 13:07, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  128. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  GZWDer (talk) 16:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Excellent user, active em many projects, executor of many regular tasks in all. able, therefore, to be Steward Leon saudanha (talk) 16:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Mirer (talk) 19:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  131. MBurch (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  MBurch (talk) 03:23, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Önni (Not eligible, checked by Jianhui67) •  Önni (talk) 03:34, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  Shizhao (talk) 07:44, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Nioger (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Nioger (talk) 10:43, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Octahedron80 (talk) 13:23, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Experienced in cross wiki stuff. Shanmugamp7 (talk) 13:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  136. P.T. Aufrette (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  P.T. Aufrette (talk) 18:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Jusjih (talk) 00:10, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  138. NicatronTg (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  NicatronTg (talk) 03:06, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Cosine02 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Trusted. Stang 05:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Pratyeka (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  +1 for non-English, +1 for active, +1 for comprehensible, +1 for accessible, +1 for policy-aware. Pratyeka (talk) 06:29, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Odisha1 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Srikant Kedia 14:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Mathonius (Eligible, checked by Atcovi)2016 •  Mathonius (talk) 19:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Amaling (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Amaling (talk) 19:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Pedrassani (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Pedrassani (talk) 22:26, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Magog the Ogre (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Fordmadoxfraud (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Ford MF (talk) 06:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Emin • message 07:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Popo le Chien (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  I liked what I read, FWIW. Popo le Chien (talk) 10:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Taketa (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Trusted and experienced. Taketa (talk) 10:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  149. BluesyPete (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  BluesyPete (talk) 17:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Arbnos (talk) 18:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Ashaio (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Ashaio (talk) 19:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  152. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  DangSunM (talk) 20:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Bmhs823 (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  Bmhs823 (talk) 08:09, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  —Ah3kal (talk) 08:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  155. DAVID MAS V. (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Un Gran Candidato sin dudas a Steward. TELETRECE (talk) 17:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       BRPever (Not eligible, checked by Stryn) •  BRP ever 18:14, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Yair rand (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Yair rand (talk) 20:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Tom29739 (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Tom29739 (talk) 21:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Boshomi (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Boshomi (talk) 23:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 23:43, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Osy (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Osy (talk) 00:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Bogger (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Bogger (talk) 08:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Stephen Allcroft (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Stephen Allcroft (talk) 18:16, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  160. LaZ0r (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  LaZ0r (talk) 20:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Manytexts (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  interesting profile, capabilities good; friendly tone Manytexts (talk) 21:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Yakifahmi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Yakifahmi (talk) 01:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Lt2818 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Lt2818 (talk) 07:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Ananth subray (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Ananth subray (talk) 12:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Alexandru M. (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Alexandru M. (talk) 16:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Seems like a good if young candidate. The "no" case is mostly devoid of supporting evidence. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Mick Knapton (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Good luck in the election. You'd be a good steward. Mick Knapton (talk) 19:44, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Zyephyrus (talk) 01:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Bennylin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  I'm going with yes for this candidate ✒ Bennylin 04:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  168. stevenmitchell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Thumbs Up! Stevenmitchell (talk) 04:48, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Somercet (Not eligible, checked by Stryn) •  "These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others." -- Groucho Marx Somercet (talk) 05:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  169. PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 09:21, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Ajpvalente (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Ajpvalente (talk) 14:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Hobbamock (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Hobbamock (talk) 14:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  172. Aydinsalis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Aydinsalis (talk) 22:30, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  173. PauloMSimoes (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  PauloMSimoes (talk) 22:57, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  174. La femme de menage (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  En espérant qu'aux âmes bien nées...--La femme de menage (talk) 09:08, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  175. NoychoH (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  NoychoH (talk) 12:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Kirk39 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Kirk39 (talk) 12:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:06, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  178. EstanislaoVinse (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  EstanislaoVinse (talk) 15:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Neolexx (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  NeoLexx (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Jabberwoch (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  " Largely per Vogone; some concerns but also has relevant experience" Jabberwoch (talk) 01:20, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Dimitra megest (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Dimitra megest (talk) 01:48, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  182. DARIO SEVERI (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  DARIO SEVERI (talk) 03:41, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  183. J7729 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  J7729 (talk) 08:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Mazuritz (talk) 10:59, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       69alex69 (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  69alex69 (talk) 12:25, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Zdzislaw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Zdzislaw (talk) 16:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Proektir (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Proektir (talk) 16:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Antanana (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  アンタナナ 16:54, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Lutzv (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Lutzv (talk) 22:19, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  188. Ліонкінг (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  per NickK Ліонкінг (talk) 23:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  189. Defrenrokorit (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Defrenrokorit (talk) 05:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Ireas (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  Ireas (talk) 13:46, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  No edit

  1. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Herby talk thyme 14:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --6AND5 (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  To young and imho not active enough for the rather large number of advanced permissions he sought in the past. Natuur12 (talk) 15:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ulflarsen (talk) 15:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 16:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Ganímedes (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Ganímedes (talk) 16:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Not enough experience yet. Miniapolis 17:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Widr (talk) 17:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Almondega (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  He demonstrated partiality and lack of education in conflict resolution. As could be seen here Almondega (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. ArthurPSmith (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Try again in a few years; it looks like you've done good work, but experience is important for this. ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Armbrust (talk) 18:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Mscuthbert (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Mscuthbert (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  ChristophThomas (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hubertl (talk) 23:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  MF-W 00:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Checkingfax (talk) 02:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Legoktm (talk) 03:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Gimmy dd (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  --Buggia 14:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  I wish to be more active in the future his/her. --Uğurkenttalk 19:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Ernstol (talk) 20:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Gorlingor (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Gulnar Rehimli (Not eligible, checked by shanmugamp7) •  Gulnar Rehimli (talk) 10:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  --Veleius
  26. Technopat (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Technopat (talk) 09:05, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Alexanderps (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  after your actions, when changed politics in pt.wiki, to protect a sysop, I can't vote in your name as Steward. Alex Pereira falaê 10:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Stanglavine (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Stanglavine (talk) 16:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Beria (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Agree with Natuur and Alex Pereira Béria L. de Rodríguez msg 04:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Fuxx (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016 •  Fuxx (talk) 18:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Fdssdf (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Fdssdf (talk) 23:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Hemeier (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Hemeier (talk) 10:25, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Vitor Mazuco (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Vitor Mazuco Msg 12:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Odder (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  odder (talk) 13:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. JMGM (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  JMGM (talk) 15:05, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Ringbang (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ringbang (talk) 21:29, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Berlin-George (talk) 00:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Nice poa (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  with Natuur12 and Alex Pereira Nice poa (talk) 02:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. João Carvalho (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  --João Carvalho (talk) 03:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC) no longer deserve my confidence after having distorted the rules to defend an administrator.[reply]
    Sorry, but to which you are referring? I do not understend your vote. Érico (talk) 03:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. CaZeRillo (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  CaZeRillo (talk) 09:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. André Koehne (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016 •  André Koehne (talk) 14:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC) (Wikimedia needs no inquisitors, but who respects the community.)[reply]
  42. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Has made some 187 edits to Wikiversities, but none since 2012. Sorry for your loss! --Marshallsumter (talk) 15:24, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Xatian11968 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Xatian11968 (talk) 17:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Qewr4231 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Qewr4231 (talk) 21:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Braz Leme (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Braz Leme (talk) 22:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC) Agree with Alex Pereira, Nattur and Almondega. Partial, he protects certain users over others. Very dangerous to be steward![reply]
  45. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  KTo288 (talk) 08:50, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Too many politicians among his early creations Mathmensch (talk) 06:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Maleine258 (talk) 13:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 14:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Höyhens (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Höyhens (talk) 23:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. JSSX (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  JSSX (talk) 02:09, 22 February 2016 (UTC) He don't respect the decisions of the community of pt.wikipedia. He changed a internal politic of pt.Wikipedia to protect a sysop. He don't respect the privacy rights of other users in sites offwiki, like Facebook, for example. To do this things he has the protection of steward Teles and other friends.[reply]
       CrazyD (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  CrazyD (talk) 10:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Tonton_Bernardo (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Tonton_Bernardo (talk) - Falta de respeito. Tonton Bernardo (talk) 16:49, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Kadavr2000 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Kadavr2000 (talk) 18:35, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Pedrohoneto (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Not now. Pedrohoneto (talk) 19:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Caiaffa (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Caiaffa (talk) 22:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. The Traditionalist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  The Traditionalist (talk) 13:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Glane23 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Geoff Who, me? 22:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Styko (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Styko (talk) 06:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  The Banner (talk) 14:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. OTAVIO1981 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  OTAVIO1981 (talk) 14:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Saramag (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Saramag (talk) 11:29, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. ContributorQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  --ContributorQ (talk) 18:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Brejnev (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  When I read this section and the affiliated comments, I say no. Brejnev (talk) 14:51, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Varina (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Varina (talk) 16:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Imbericle (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Imbericle (talk) 23:08, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Next Year maybe! Pratyya (Hello!) 12:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Nnemo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Nnemo (talk) 13:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral edit

  1. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Experienced SWMT member, though recently not as much present as I'd expect a steward candidate to be. Furthermore, I'm not sure if running for stewardship so shortly after failing a request for checkuser rights is such a good idea. --Vogone (talk) 14:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Might be well suited in the future. Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Sevimleribo (talk) 17:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Largely per Vogone; some concerns but also has relevant experience. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Nrautava (talk) 18:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  HalanTul (talk) 02:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Deb (talk) 12:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Vinckie (talk) 12:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Lsanabria (talk) 14:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  per Vogone DCB (talk) 17:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Holmium (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Holmium (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Caballero1967 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Excellent candidate, I am just concerned with the lenght of the experience Caballero1967 (talk) 21:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Waka Waka (talk) 00:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Jmvkrecords (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 14:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  I liked working with Erico, but (s)he needs to show a sustained return to activity in order to get a support from me. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Hampcky (talk) 22:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    GZWDer (talk) 19:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Magawla61 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Magawla61 (talk) 13:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. SideshowBob7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  SideshowBob7 (talk) 12:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. EmreDuran (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  EmreDuran (talk) 09:38, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Goombiis (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Goombiis (talk) 00:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. DerekvG (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 • --DerekvG (talk) 16:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Wetterwolke (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Wetterwolke (talk) 19:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Glaisher (talk) 17:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Avraham (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Avi (talk) 17:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  VictorBrice (talk) 20:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Vimaparo147 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Vimaparo147 (talk) 11:11, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Vachovec1 (talk) 01:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Lawrencedepe (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Lawrencedepe (talk) 08:22, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Bernd Bergmann (talk) 19:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Banfield (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Banfield - Reclamos aquí 23:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ysjbserver (talk) 07:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2016/Votes/Érico&oldid=15393424"