Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/Syum90

< Stewards | Elections 2016

Syum90

edit
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: es-N, ca-3, en-2
  • Personal info: (English)
    Dear fellows, after considering it for a time I've decided applying for stewardship because I'm convinced that I could be much more useful and helpful to the community having these tools.

    I started contributing to the Wikimedia projects in August 2012, but I was not very active until January 2014. Since September 2014 I'm an active member of the SWMT and I contribute mainly fighting against vandalism and spam cross-wiki, and doing other maintenance tasks as cleaning test/nonsense/unuseful pages, broken redirects, etc. on wikis with no active admins. I became a global rollbacker in December 2014 and a global sysop in early June 2015 (global sysop statistics). In addition I contribute at all kind of tasks at my home wikis: Catalan Wikinews, where I have sysop rights since November 2014; Spanish Wikibooks, where I have sysop and bureaucrat rights since February 2015; Meta, where I have sysop rights since September 2015.

    When I'm online I'm always avaible at several IRC channels (#cvn-swconnect, #wikimedia-gsconnect, #wikibooks-esconnect), and I'm also available at all my talk pages cross-wiki and by e-mail. I'm always available to help any user on all that I can do.

    If elected as steward I would help at all steward tasks as SRG, SRM, SRCU, SRP, SRUC, SRB or VR, and fighting against vandalism and spam, off course. I cannot promise that I will always be right in my decisions, I'm human and I can do mistakes, but I can ensure that I will act always with honesty, transparency and common sense, as I've done until now.

    I speak Spanish (N) as my native language, and I have an advanced level of Catalan (3) and medium of English (2). I can understand pretty well other local languages of Spain as Galician, Aragonese, Asturian or Extremadurian, and not as well other Romanic languages as Portuguese or Italian. My timezone is UTC+1.

    If you want to know something more about me I will be happy answering your questions. Thank you very much for your consideration.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#Syum90


  Yes

edit
  1. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --6AND5 (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Bookvaedina (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •    Support --Bookvaedina (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Cadfaell (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •    Support -- Cadfaell (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Xabier Cañas (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •    Support --Xabier Cañas (talk) 14:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Very active, experienced and helpful user. RadiX∞ 15:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I believe this user knows what he/she is doing and the activity level is sufficiant. Perhaps a bit to early but meh, let's give it a shot. Natuur12 (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Holder (talk) 15:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Yeza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Yeza (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Vituzzu (talk) 15:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. JackPotte (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •   Support Good job, I think that's not too early. JackPotte (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Syum90 only has two years of experience, but with a lot of crosswiki edits, global sysop, and good participation on content wikis, I think they will do fine as a steward. Rschen7754 15:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Cárdenas (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Cárdenas (talk) 16:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Żyrafał (talk) 16:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Sfic (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Sfic (talk) 16:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  He may be young in Wikimedia projects but due to his work and cross wiki experience I am very comfortable with him being steward, trust him. —Ah3kal (talk) 16:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. மதனாஹரன் (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Mathanaharan (talk) 17:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Sevimleribo (talk) 17:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Sure. Good cross-wiki experience, and some clear indication that they know how to use the steward rights. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Widr (talk) 17:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Leništudent (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Leništudent (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Alan (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. LavaBaron (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  LavaBaron (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  White Master (es) 18:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Mscuthbert (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Mscuthbert (talk) 19:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Extremadurian! OlEnglish (Talk) 20:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Lsanabria (talk) 20:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Wolmar (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Wolmar (talk) 21:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Riley Huntley (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Great user, quite helpful, perhaps a little early but oh well. Riley Huntley (talk) 21:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Druddigon (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Druddigon (talk | contributions) 21:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  I think he/she can do this task with cross-wiki experience. --Uğurkenttalk 21:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Laberinto16 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Laberinto16 (talk) 22:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Of course Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Eman235 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Eman235/talk 23:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Zeljko (talk) 00:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hubertl (talk) 00:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. HakanIST (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  HakanIST (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  SQLQuery me! 00:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. VitaDei (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  VitaDei (talk) 00:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 00:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  eurodyne (talk) 02:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  1.5 years as a SWMT member looks like an appropriate experience for me — NickK (talk) 02:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Legoktm (talk) 03:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hkjacksonhk (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Per Natuur12. Give it a shot and see what happens. Hedwig in Washington (talk) 04:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Yash! 04:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  A bit too soon, but I trust he would do a good job. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 04:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Velirand (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Velirand (talk) 08:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. InsaneHacker (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Looks very dedicated and determined to help out with the projects. Have a +1 from me. InsaneHacker (talk) 08:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Kippelboy (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Kippelboy (talk) 08:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. ANKAN GHOSH DASTIDER (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  ANKAN GHOSH DASTIDER (talk) 09:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Babymissfortune (talk) 11:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  David1010 (talk) 12:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Kasir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Kasir talk 12:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Gimmy dd (talk) 12:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Ellery (talk) 13:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Has the experience and is trusted. No reason why not. Trijnsteltalk 13:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 13:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Absolutely. Diligent, competent, hard-working and a team player. Has runs on the board and an excellent candidate.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  DCB (talk) 18:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Active, competent and has enough experience. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  CLCStudent (talk) 19:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. TomášPolonec (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  TomášPolonec (talk) 19:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Ernstol (talk) 19:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Xavier Dengra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Tots els ànims Syum90! Xavi Dengra (MESSAGES) 21:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  100 % support. :) Ghiutun 22:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Caligatus (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Caligatus (talk) 22:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone) •  Risk Engineer (talk) 00:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Jarould (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jarould (talk) 01:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Wildcursive (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Wildcursive (talk) 02:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Maferlona (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Maferlona (talk) 02:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Timothycrice (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Timothycrice (talk) 05:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Sj (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  –SJ talk  06:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Pau Colominas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •    Support Pau Colominas (talk) 08:33, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. MarcoAurelio (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  I can vouch for Syum90's good work. I had the pleasure to work with him on some projects and IMO looks responsible enough for this role. I think that Syum90 has the maturity and mood required for this. Thank you. —MarcoAurelio 11:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ok Infinite0694 (Talk) 11:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Ibrahim khashrowdi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Good job Ibrahim khashrowdi (talk) 11:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  cyrfaw (talk) 12:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Tiputini (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Tiputini (talk) 12:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Active enough. — T. 13:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Maragm (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Maragm (talk) 15:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Holmium (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Holmium (talk) 15:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Wintereu (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Wintereu 16:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. F3RaN (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  F3RaN (talk) 16:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Rxy (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  rxy (talk) 17:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. IrwinSantos (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Irwin アーウィン 18:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Unapersona (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Unapersona (talk) 18:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Matiia (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Matiia (talk) 19:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Discussed with others. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Caballero1967 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  I appreciate the way this candidate articulated its views for volunteering as a steward and broad involvement in various projects. Its edits have also been well executed. Caballero1967 (talk) 21:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  MelanieN (talk) 22:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. XanaG (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Xana (talk) 00:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Waka Waka (talk) 01:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  94. 레몬이 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  레몬이 (talk) 06:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Morza (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Morza (sono qui) 08:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  –Ejs-80 08:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Maragm (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Maragm (talk) 08:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Technopat (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Technopat (talk) 08:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Tucoxn (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  - tucoxn\talk 13:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Barras (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Seems to be a good candidate. Experienced and active. Absolutely no issues for me here. -Barras talk 13:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Jmvkrecords (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Jmvkrecords ⚜ (Intra talk) 14:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  102. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Rahmanuddin (talk) 15:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Marcelo Victor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Mvictor talk 19:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  104. PetrohsW (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  petrohs (gracias) 20:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  105. ~Expresses life (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  ¡Suerte!. まSan [T•C•ES] 22:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  106. Ascánder (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Ascánder (talk) 02:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  107. RicoRico (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  RicoRico (talk) 08:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  FASTILY 09:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Kette~cawiki (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Kette~cawiki (talk) 10:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Clivemacd (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Clivemacd (talk) 10:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016 •  Rberchie (talk) 11:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Myopic pattern (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Myopic pattern (talk) 17:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Snaevar (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  good cross-wiki record - has contributed to many wikis.--Snaevar (talk) 19:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Érico (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Érico (talk) 20:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 23:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Defender (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Defender (talk) 01:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Xoegki (Eligible, checked by 范)2016 •  Xoegki (talk) 04:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  118. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Eager Lin (Message) 05:22, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Medol (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Medol (talk) 08:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Wikibenchris (talk) 11:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  121. AMPERIO (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  AMPERIO (talk) 12:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Lanwi1 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Lanwi1(Talk) 16:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Drcenjary (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  He may prove as an asset in his capacity as Multilingual Speaker. His knowledge on Spanish, Catalan, English, Galician, Aragone, Asturian. So He should be in. Drcenjary (talk) 17:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Dave Braunschweig (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Dave Braunschweig (talk) 17:56, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Geoide (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Geoide (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Papapep (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Papapep (talk) 20:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Hampcky (talk) 22:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Carlotm (talk) 04:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  129. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  B20180 (talk) 05:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •    Support Ferran Mir (talk) 07:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Drzewianin (talk) 09:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  132. AryanSogd (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •    Support--AryanSogd 10:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Melos (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016 •  Melos (talk) 13:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Seedorfjohnny (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Seedorfjohnny (talk) 16:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Beusson (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Beusson (talk) 18:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Fuxx (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016 •  Fuxx (talk) 18:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  137. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  GZWDer (talk) 19:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Knowledgebattle (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Knowledgebattle (talk) 01:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Az1568 (talk) 02:10, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Sensible counter-vandalism user according to his contribs. Mathmensch (talk) 08:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Obaid Raza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Obaid Raza (talk) 09:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Caliburn (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  No issues, good cross-wiki activity and good experience. Great candidate! Caliburn (talk) 09:20, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  143. QuiteUnusual (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Good work, dedicated, seems responsible and trustworthy. QuiteUnusual (talk) 11:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Antoine.01 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Antoine.01 (talk) 15:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  145. LEANSER (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  LEANSER (talk) 18:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Tufor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Sure thing, very good candidate. Experienced and active. tufor (talk) 22:00, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Fadesga (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Fadesga (talk) 23:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Thogo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  თოგო (D) 23:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       BAB ZAA (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) • --BAB ZAA (talk) 04:43, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Saehrimnir (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Saehrimnir (talk) 13:24, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:52, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Pcnavod (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Pcnavod (talk) 21:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Ankry (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ankry (talk) 07:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I think this SE comes a bit too early, occasionally his interpretation of policies is a bit strange, which has mostly to do with him still being quite new. Might be a good candidate at a future SE. --Vogone (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  per Vogone. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Gereon K. (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Roland Kutzki (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Like Vogone, I think this request comes too early after you becoming active (on WMF wikis in general, and SWMT/Meta issues in particular). I think next year would be good. --MF-W 15:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Addition: I am much befuddled by the strange goings-on here. --MF-W 21:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Well executed edits and very active, but too soon. – Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 15:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  8. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ulflarsen (talk) 15:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per Vogone and MF-W. Mh7kJ (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Jahaza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Jahaza (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 16:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  SPQRobin (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Asav (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Asav (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Lacks experience.[reply]
  14. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Armbrust (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Reguyla (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I'm sorry but not enough experience. Less than 2 years of active editing just isn't enough for me to support. Reguyla (talk) 19:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per Reguyla. Miniapolis 20:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  ChristophThomas (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Checkingfax (talk) 02:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Chiumbi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  As I suppose, otherwise OK, but the history is far too short. Chiumbi (talk) 11:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Deb (talk) 12:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Gorlingor (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Veleius
  24. Ireas (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  Ireas (talk) 22:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Not sure whether he is already experienced enough. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Kubura (Eligible, checked by 范)2016 •  Stewardship requires a lot of years of editor and sysop experience, at least five. So, this candidacy came too too early. With more experience, this user might be a good choice in future. Kubura (talk) 05:14, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. VMS Mosaic (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016 •  VMS Mosaic (talk) 05:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Omerlaziale (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Omerlaziale (talk) 06:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Smile4ever (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Smile4ever (talk) 10:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. -revi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Not this year, imo too early. — regards, Revi 17:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Helmy oved (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Helmy oved 18:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Tadol (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Tadol (talk) 01:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Informationswiedergutmachung (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 07:52, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Magawla61 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Magawla61 (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  too early Alexmar983 (talk) 13:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Steschke (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  ST ○ 20:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Rax (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Rax (talk) 22:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC) per Vogone[reply]
  38. Gonzo.Lubitsch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 07:15, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Hemeier (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Hemeier (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Odder (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  odder (talk) 13:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Ringbang (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ringbang (talk) 21:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  I'm sorry, but I think another year of experience is needed. Courcelles 22:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Berlin-George (talk) 23:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Maybe too young ? --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Herby talk thyme 16:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  a bit later maybe... Nrautava (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Flyingfischer (talk) 18:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Work2win (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Work2win (talk) 20:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  HalanTul (talk) 02:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Vinckie (talk) 12:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Nannadeem (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per views of Vogone Nannadeem (talk) 07:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016 •  Gag0409 (talk) 14:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  NaBUru38 (talk) 13:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Taichi (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Taichi - (あ！) 06:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. AdiMind (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  AdiMind (talk) 18:18, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2016/Votes/Syum90&oldid=15355925"