Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/Syum90

Syum90 edit

ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: es-N, ca-3, en-2
  • Personal info: (English)
    Dear fellows, after considering it for a time I've decided applying for stewardship because I'm convinced that I could be much more useful and helpful to the community having these tools.

    I started contributing to the Wikimedia projects in August 2012, but I was not very active until January 2014. Since September 2014 I'm an active member of the SWMT and I contribute mainly fighting against vandalism and spam cross-wiki, and doing other maintenance tasks as cleaning test/nonsense/unuseful pages, broken redirects, etc. on wikis with no active admins. I became a global rollbacker in December 2014 and a global sysop in early June 2015 (global sysop statistics). In addition I contribute at all kind of tasks at my home wikis: Catalan Wikinews, where I have sysop rights since November 2014; Spanish Wikibooks, where I have sysop and bureaucrat rights since February 2015; Meta, where I have sysop rights since September 2015.

    When I'm online I'm always avaible at several IRC channels (#cvn-swconnect, #wikimedia-gsconnect, #wikibooks-esconnect), and I'm also available at all my talk pages cross-wiki and by e-mail. I'm always available to help any user on all that I can do.

    If elected as steward I would help at all steward tasks as SRG, SRM, SRCU, SRP, SRUC, SRB or VR, and fighting against vandalism and spam, off course. I cannot promise that I will always be right in my decisions, I'm human and I can do mistakes, but I can ensure that I will act always with honesty, transparency and common sense, as I've done until now.

    I speak Spanish (N) as my native language, and I have an advanced level of Catalan (3) and medium of English (2). I can understand pretty well other local languages of Spain as Galician, Aragonese, Asturian or Extremadurian, and not as well other Romanic languages as Portuguese or Italian. My timezone is UTC+1.

    If you want to know something more about me I will be happy answering your questions. Thank you very much for your consideration.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#Syum90


  Yes edit

  1. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --6AND5 (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Bookvaedina (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016     Support --Bookvaedina (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Cadfaell (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016     Support -- Cadfaell (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Xabier Cañas (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016     Support --Xabier Cañas (talk) 14:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Very active, experienced and helpful user. RadiX 15:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   I believe this user knows what he/she is doing and the activity level is sufficiant. Perhaps a bit to early but meh, let's give it a shot. Natuur12 (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --Holder (talk) 15:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Yeza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --Yeza (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Vituzzu (talk) 15:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. JackPotte (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016    Support Good job, I think that's not too early. JackPotte (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Syum90 only has two years of experience, but with a lot of crosswiki edits, global sysop, and good participation on content wikis, I think they will do fine as a steward. Rschen7754 15:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Cárdenas (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --Cárdenas (talk) 16:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Żyrafał (talk) 16:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Sfic (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Sfic (talk) 16:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   He may be young in Wikimedia projects but due to his work and cross wiki experience I am very comfortable with him being steward, trust him. —Ah3kal (talk) 16:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. மதனாஹரன் (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Mathanaharan (talk) 17:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   Sevimleribo (talk) 17:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Sure. Good cross-wiki experience, and some clear indication that they know how to use the steward rights. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Widr (talk) 17:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Leništudent (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Leništudent (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Alan (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. LavaBaron (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   LavaBaron (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   White Master (es) 18:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Mscuthbert (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Mscuthbert (talk) 19:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Extremadurian! OlEnglish (Talk) 20:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Lsanabria (talk) 20:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Wolmar (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Wolmar (talk) 21:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Riley Huntley (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Great user, quite helpful, perhaps a little early but oh well. Riley Huntley (talk) 21:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Druddigon (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Druddigon (talk | contributions) 21:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   I think he/she can do this task with cross-wiki experience. --Uğurkenttalk 21:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Laberinto16 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Laberinto16 (talk) 22:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Of course Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Eman235 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Eman235/talk 23:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Zeljko (talk) 00:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Hubertl (talk) 00:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. HakanIST (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   HakanIST (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   SQLQuery me! 00:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. VitaDei (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   VitaDei (talk) 00:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 00:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   eurodyne (talk) 02:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   1.5 years as a SWMT member looks like an appropriate experience for me — NickK (talk) 02:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Legoktm (talk) 03:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Hkjacksonhk (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Per Natuur12. Give it a shot and see what happens. Hedwig in Washington (talk) 04:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Yash! 04:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   A bit too soon, but I trust he would do a good job. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 04:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Velirand (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Velirand (talk) 08:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. InsaneHacker (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Looks very dedicated and determined to help out with the projects. Have a +1 from me. InsaneHacker (talk) 08:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Kippelboy (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Kippelboy (talk) 08:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. ANKAN GHOSH DASTIDER (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   ANKAN GHOSH DASTIDER (talk) 09:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Babymissfortune (talk) 11:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   David1010 (talk) 12:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Kasir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Kasir talk 12:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Gimmy dd (talk) 12:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Ellery (talk) 13:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Has the experience and is trusted. No reason why not. Trijnsteltalk 13:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Kolega2357 (talk) 13:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Absolutely. Diligent, competent, hard-working and a team player. Has runs on the board and an excellent candidate.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   DCB (talk) 18:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Active, competent and has enough experience. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   CLCStudent (talk) 19:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. TomášPolonec (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   TomášPolonec (talk) 19:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Ernstol (talk) 19:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Xavier Dengra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Tots els ànims Syum90! Xavi Dengra (MESSAGES) 21:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   100 % support. :) Ghiutun 22:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Caligatus (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Caligatus (talk) 22:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone)   Risk Engineer (talk) 00:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Jarould (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Jarould (talk) 01:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Wildcursive (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Wildcursive (talk) 02:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Maferlona (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Maferlona (talk) 02:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Timothycrice (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Timothycrice (talk) 05:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Sj (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   SJ talk  06:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Pau Colominas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016     Support Pau Colominas (talk) 08:33, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. MarcoAurelio (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   I can vouch for Syum90's good work. I had the pleasure to work with him on some projects and IMO looks responsible enough for this role. I think that Syum90 has the maturity and mood required for this. Thank you. —MarcoAurelio 11:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ok Infinite0694 (Talk) 11:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Ibrahim khashrowdi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Good job Ibrahim khashrowdi (talk) 11:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   cyrfaw (talk) 12:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Tiputini (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Tiputini (talk) 12:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Active enough. — T. 13:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Maragm (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --Maragm (talk) 15:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Holmium (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Holmium (talk) 15:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Wintereu (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Wintereu 16:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. F3RaN (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   F3RaN (talk) 16:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Rxy (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   rxy (talk) 17:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. IrwinSantos (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Irwin アーウィン 18:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Unapersona (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Unapersona (talk) 18:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Matiia (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Matiia (talk) 19:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Discussed with others. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Caballero1967 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   I appreciate the way this candidate articulated its views for volunteering as a steward and broad involvement in various projects. Its edits have also been well executed. Caballero1967 (talk) 21:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016   MelanieN (talk) 22:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. XanaG (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Xana (talk) 00:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Waka Waka (talk) 01:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  94. 레몬이 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   레몬이 (talk) 06:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Morza (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Morza (sono qui) 08:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   –Ejs-80 08:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Maragm (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Maragm (talk) 08:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Technopat (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Technopat (talk) 08:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Tucoxn (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   - tucoxn\talk 13:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Barras (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Seems to be a good candidate. Experienced and active. Absolutely no issues for me here. -Barras talk 13:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Jmvkrecords (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Jmvkrecords (Intra talk) 14:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  102. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Rahmanuddin (talk) 15:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Marcelo Victor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Mvictor talk 19:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  104. PetrohsW (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   petrohs (gracias) 20:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  105. ~Expresses life (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   ¡Suerte!. まSan [TCES] 22:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  106. Ascánder (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Ascánder (talk) 02:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  107. RicoRico (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   RicoRico (talk) 08:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   FASTILY 09:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Kette~cawiki (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Kette~cawiki (talk) 10:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Clivemacd (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Clivemacd (talk) 10:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016   Rberchie (talk) 11:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Myopic pattern (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Myopic pattern (talk) 17:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Snaevar (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   good cross-wiki record - has contributed to many wikis.--Snaevar (talk) 19:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Érico (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Érico (talk) 20:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 23:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Defender (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Defender (talk) 01:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Xoegki (Eligible, checked by )2016   Xoegki (talk) 04:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  118. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Eager Lin (Message) 05:22, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Medol (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Medol (talk) 08:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Wikibenchris (talk) 11:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  121. AMPERIO (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   AMPERIO (talk) 12:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Lanwi1 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Lanwi1(Talk) 16:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Drcenjary (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   He may prove as an asset in his capacity as Multilingual Speaker. His knowledge on Spanish, Catalan, English, Galician, Aragone, Asturian. So He should be in. Drcenjary (talk) 17:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Dave Braunschweig (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Dave Braunschweig (talk) 17:56, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Geoide (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Geoide (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Papapep (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Papapep (talk) 20:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   --Hampcky (talk) 22:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Carlotm (talk) 04:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  129. B20180 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   B20180 (talk) 05:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016     Support Ferran Mir (talk) 07:51, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Drzewianin (talk) 09:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  132. AryanSogd (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016     Support--AryanSogd 10:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Melos (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016   Melos (talk) 13:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Seedorfjohnny (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Seedorfjohnny (talk) 16:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Beusson (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Beusson (talk) 18:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Fuxx (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016   Fuxx (talk) 18:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  137. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   GZWDer (talk) 19:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Knowledgebattle (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Knowledgebattle (talk) 01:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Az1568 (talk) 02:10, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Sensible counter-vandalism user according to his contribs. Mathmensch (talk) 08:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Obaid Raza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Obaid Raza (talk) 09:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Caliburn (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   No issues, good cross-wiki activity and good experience. Great candidate! Caliburn (talk) 09:20, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  143. QuiteUnusual (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Good work, dedicated, seems responsible and trustworthy. QuiteUnusual (talk) 11:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Antoine.01 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Antoine.01 (talk) 15:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  145. LEANSER (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   LEANSER (talk) 18:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Tufor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Sure thing, very good candidate. Experienced and active. tufor (talk) 22:00, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Fadesga (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Fadesga (talk) 23:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Thogo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   თოგო (D) 23:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       BAB ZAA (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)  --BAB ZAA (talk) 04:43, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Saehrimnir (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Saehrimnir (talk) 13:24, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:52, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Pcnavod (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Pcnavod (talk) 21:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Ankry (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Ankry (talk) 07:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  No edit

  1. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   I think this SE comes a bit too early, occasionally his interpretation of policies is a bit strange, which has mostly to do with him still being quite new. Might be a good candidate at a future SE. --Vogone (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   per Vogone. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --Gereon K. (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --Roland Kutzki (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Like Vogone, I think this request comes too early after you becoming active (on WMF wikis in general, and SWMT/Meta issues in particular). I think next year would be good. --MF-W 15:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Addition: I am much befuddled by the strange goings-on here. --MF-W 21:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Well executed edits and very active, but too soon. – Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 15:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  8. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ulflarsen (talk) 15:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Per Vogone and MF-W. Mh7kJ (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Jahaza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Jahaza (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   O.Koslowski (talk) 16:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   SPQRobin (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Asav (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Asav (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Lacks experience.[reply]
  14. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Armbrust (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Reguyla (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   I'm sorry but not enough experience. Less than 2 years of active editing just isn't enough for me to support. Reguyla (talk) 19:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Per Reguyla. Miniapolis 20:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   ChristophThomas (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Checkingfax (talk) 02:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Chiumbi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   As I suppose, otherwise OK, but the history is far too short. Chiumbi (talk) 11:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Deb (talk) 12:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Gorlingor (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Veleius
  24. Ireas (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016   Ireas (talk) 22:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Not sure whether he is already experienced enough. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Kubura (Eligible, checked by )2016   Stewardship requires a lot of years of editor and sysop experience, at least five. So, this candidacy came too too early. With more experience, this user might be a good choice in future. Kubura (talk) 05:14, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. VMS Mosaic (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016   VMS Mosaic (talk) 05:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Omerlaziale (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Omerlaziale (talk) 06:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Smile4ever (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Smile4ever (talk) 10:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. -revi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Not this year, imo too early. — regards, Revi 17:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Helmy oved (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Helmy oved 18:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Tadol (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Tadol (talk) 01:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Informationswiedergutmachung (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Informationswiedergutmachung (talk) 07:52, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Magawla61 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Magawla61 (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   too early Alexmar983 (talk) 13:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Steschke (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   ST 20:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Rax (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   --Rax (talk) 22:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC) per Vogone[reply]
  38. Gonzo.Lubitsch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 07:15, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Hemeier (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Hemeier (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Odder (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   odder (talk) 13:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Ringbang (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Ringbang (talk) 21:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   I'm sorry, but I think another year of experience is needed. Courcelles 22:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Berlin-George (talk) 23:55, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral edit

  1. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Maybe too young ? --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Herby talk thyme 16:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   a bit later maybe... Nrautava (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Flyingfischer (talk) 18:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Work2win (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Work2win (talk) 20:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   HalanTul (talk) 02:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Vinckie (talk) 12:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Nannadeem (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Per views of Vogone Nannadeem (talk) 07:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016   Gag0409 (talk) 14:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   NaBUru38 (talk) 13:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Taichi (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Taichi - (あ!) 06:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. AdiMind (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   AdiMind (talk) 18:18, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]