Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/Rxy

Warning

These steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Rxy edit

ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: ja, en-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello, everyone. I'm rxy (formerly known as Hosiryuhosi).

    I'm active at Japanese Wikipedia since 2008. Previously, I served as sysop and bureaucrat in that wiki, and served as sysop in meta and wikidata. In addition to this, I'm former global-sysop.

    Also as CVN staff, I manage CVNBots and IRC channels. This bots is used in SWMT.

    Reason for candidacy: We have many x-wiki vandals (e.g. spambot or LTA), but when I only having global-sysop rights, some x-wiki vandals cannot be stopped. Sometimes needed helping by stewards for global blocking and Locking CA account.

    if I elected, I'll be help to current stewards and everyone for fighting vandalism and handling various requests.

    I was inactive In 2015 for busy in real world, but I'll be active in 2016.

    Thank you for reading my statement.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#Rxy


  Yes edit

  1. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --6AND5 (talk) 14:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --Holder (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Even though Rxy does not hold adminship anywhere now, he has served in many local and global roles in the past without issue. He has been fighting crosswiki vandals longer than many of the current stewards. I have never had any concerns about his handling private information as evidenced by his requests for oversight. Rschen7754 15:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       GodeNehler (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   GodeNehler (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   Sevimleribo (talk) 17:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   While taking into account Vogone's statement, I will vote yes because this user's past is a strong indication that he will do good use with the steward tools —Ah3kal (talk) 17:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       パン粉と片栗粉 (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)   --パン粉と片栗粉 (talk) 17:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Net positive. OlEnglish (Talk) 20:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Wolmar (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Wolmar (talk) 21:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Riley Huntley (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Per Rschen7754. Riley Huntley (talk) 22:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Eman235 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Eman235/talk 23:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Zeljko (talk) 00:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   SQLQuery me! 00:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Has done a good job in the past. I believe that, as he says, he will be active this year and recognize it is important to have experienced Japanese speakers on the team. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 00:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. 目黒の隠居 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   He was administrator .and he is trusted 目黒の隠居 (talk) 02:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   HalanTul (talk) 02:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Good experience, and I recall seeing him active fighting vandalism back as Hosiryuhosi. I do hope that he will be more active this year as a steward — NickK (talk) 02:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. すじにくシチュー (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   すじにくシチュー (talk) 02:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Legoktm (talk) 03:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Yash! 04:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Agung.karjono (Not eligible, checked by Eurodyne)   Agung.karjono (talk) 05:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. W.CC (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   He was a sysop and bureaucrat who had been trusted on the local project (jawp). not only as a grobal sysop W.CC (talk) 09:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. 水瀬悠志 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   自治に尽力を尽くして下さいませ。 水瀬悠志 (talk) 11:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Babymissfortune (talk) 11:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Shikai shaw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   shikai shaw (talk) 11:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Of course. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Bellcricket (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Bellcricket (talk) 12:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Kasir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Kasir talk 12:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Vinckie (talk) 12:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Gimmy dd (talk) 12:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Ellery (talk) 13:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   A strong yes from me. He has the necessary experience and is trusted. Plus I very much support more Asian users in the steward team. Trijnsteltalk 13:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Kolega2357 (talk) 13:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   yes yes and yes. True candidate of quality (tools and knowledge and language), and able to help against East Asian vandals in the small wikis.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   A suitable user for the role. He did a great job in the past. And we need a more diverse group of stewards to handle requests and local issues properly as they arise. RadiX 16:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Trusted and experienced; knowing Japanese is also a plus Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       G2g886 (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)   G2g886 (talk) 20:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Érico (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Érico (talk) 21:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Triglav (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Triglav (talk) 21:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Chiba ryo (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Chiba ryo (talk) 22:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Erne Mogilevich (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   I've checked some of his work on jawiki, and I think he could be one of the most appropiate candidates to be Steward. Congratulations for your work. Erne る Mogilevich (ノート投稿記録) 23:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
  38. Ghkdekdns71 (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016   Ghkdekdns71 (talk) 00:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone)   Risk Engineer (talk) 00:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Jon Harald Søby (talk) 02:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Wildcursive (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Wildcursive (talk) 02:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Lanwi1 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Lanwi1(Talk) 03:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. 馬面長伊奈 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   馬面長伊奈 (talk) 04:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. メルビル (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   メルビル (talk) 09:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   cyrfaw (talk) 12:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Defender (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Defender (talk) 12:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   He seems unpredictable, but I assume good faith. He is helpful and can certainly become very useful for the team. — T. 13:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Drzewianin (talk) 19:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Discussed with others. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   assuming the candidate will remain active Chris Troutman (talk) 00:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Waka Waka (talk) 01:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Syum90 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Yes Syum90 (talk) 10:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Kurihaya (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   I believe Rxy is a trustworthy guardian. Kurihaya (talk) 11:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Tucoxn (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   - tucoxn\talk 13:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Barras (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   I worked with the user in the past, even last year when he was not that active. He's will be a great steward and I'm sure he'd not apply if he wouldn't be sure to have enough time. -Barras talk 13:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Trurle (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Trurle (talk) 07:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   FASTILY 09:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016   Rberchie (talk) 11:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Damena (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Damena (talk) 13:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   The votes of Barras, Rschen7754 and Billinghurst indicate that this candidate should be supported. Natuur12 (talk) 18:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Hyolee2 (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   hyolee2/H.L.LEE (talk) 19:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Snaevar (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Has an global right (global rollback) and is experienced.--Snaevar (talk) 19:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Xoegki (Eligible, checked by )2016   Xoegki (talk) 04:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. B25es (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   B25es (talk) 09:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Wishds (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   Wishds (talk) 09:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Wikibenchris (talk) 11:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Carlotm (talk) 04:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Xx kyousuke xx (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Xx kyousuke xx (talk) 05:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. 隼鷹 (Eligible, checked by Melos)2016   隼鷹 (talk) 12:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Melos (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016   Melos (talk) 13:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Seedorfjohnny (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Seedorfjohnny (talk) 16:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Bluehotel (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   Bluehotel (talk) 17:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Fuxx (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016   Fuxx (talk) 17:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   GZWDer (talk) 19:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Knowledgebattle (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Knowledgebattle (talk) 01:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Az1568 (talk) 02:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Spasage (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Spasage (talk) 07:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   –Ejs-80 08:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Caliburn (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Definately! Even though he was inactive last year, I trust that he will use the tools well this year :D Caliburn (talk) 09:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   – Meiræ 12:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Fraxinus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Fraxinus (talk) 12:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Sakoppi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Sakoppi (talk) 14:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Antoine.01 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Antoine.01 (talk) 15:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. LEANSER (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   LEANSER (talk) 18:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Yp8080123 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Yp8080123 (talk) 05:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Gonzo.Lubitsch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 07:10, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Experienced and language skills would be very useful Shanmugamp7 (talk) 08:15, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Hemeier (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Hemeier (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Hollingsworth (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Hollingsworth (talk) 21:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Courcelles 22:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. CaZeRillo (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   CaZeRillo (talk) 09:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Tufor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   tufor (talk) 18:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Matiia (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Matiia (talk) 18:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. عثمان منصور انصاري (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   عثمان منصور انصاري (talk) 20:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Robertiki (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Robertiki (talk) 04:55, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Ankry (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Ankry (talk) 09:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Ocaso33 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Ocaso33 (talk) 10:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Almost the most contributions of any steward candidate this year to the Wikiversities: 146, and some within a year (excellent)! --Marshallsumter (talk) 15:56, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   Mirer (talk) 21:05, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Qewr4231 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Qewr4231 (talk) 21:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  99. MBurch (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016   MBurch (talk) 03:45, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   Shizhao (talk) 07:47, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Octahedron80 (talk) 13:27, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Kusurija (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016  Kusurija (talk) 19:58, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Jusjih (talk) 00:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  104. NicatronTg (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   NicatronTg (talk) 03:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Cosine02 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Stang 05:37, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Pradeepabk (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   looks good Pradeepabk (talk) 11:13, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  106. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   KTo288 (talk) 14:04, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Odisha1 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   --Srikant Kedia 14:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       VisaBlack (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   VisaBlack (talk) 17:04, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Vituzzu (talk) 17:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  109. ~Expresses life (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   まSan [TCES] 17:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Миша Карелин (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   M.Karelin (talk) 17:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Mathonius (Eligible, checked by Atcovi)2016   Mathonius (talk) 19:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Yotamsvoray (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   Yotamsvoray (talk) 06:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Emin message 07:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Taketa (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Trusted and experienced. Very usefull to have a steward with native Japanese language skills. Taketa (talk) 10:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  115. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   MZaplotnik (contribs) 12:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  116. BluesyPete (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   BluesyPete (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Generally I believe in people. Taivo (talk) 18:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Arbnos (talk) 18:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Höyhens (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Höyhens (talk) 23:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Abrikoss (Not eligible, checked by Syum90)   Abrikoss (talk) 08:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   per Rschen7754 Pratyya (Hello!) 14:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Yair rand (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Yair rand (talk) 20:32, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Timk70 question? 21:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Harlock81 (talk) 22:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Boshomi (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Boshomi (talk) 23:09, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   ~Cybularny Speak? 23:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Ccgxk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Ccgxk (talk) 06:34, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Bogger (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Bogger (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Y-dash (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Y-dash 13:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Glaisher (talk) 17:38, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Luuva (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Luuva (talk) 18:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Stephen Allcroft (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Stephen Allcroft (talk) 18:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Bmhs823 (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016   Bmhs823 (talk) 08:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Kadavr2000 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Kadavr2000 (talk) 10:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Виолетова (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016   Виолетова (talk) 13:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  134. K6ka (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:32, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Yodaspirine (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Yodaspirine (talk) 20:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Arn (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Arn (talk) 21:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Pcnavod (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Pcnavod (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Zyephyrus (talk) 00:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  139. taweetham (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Taweethaも (talk) 03:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Bennylin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Valuable linguistic background, no doubt, to handle issues pertaining ja.wp. My main concern is will this user be able to communicate with other stewards well with his English. But, support from me nonetheless because I think he's more than 'en-1' that he declared. Bennylin 04:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  141. PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 09:31, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Bio06940 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Bio06940 (talk) 12:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Vilkapi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Vilkapi (talk) 17:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Aydinsalis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Aydinsalis (talk) 22:43, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Caiaffa (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Caiaffa (talk) 05:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Eltargrim (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Eltargrim (talk) 15:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Lutzv (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Lutzv (talk) 16:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  149. MirkoS18 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   MirkoS18 (talk) 20:59, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Romayan (Not eligible, checked by RadiX)   Romayan (talk) 21:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Jabberwoch (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Jabberwoch (talk) 23:13, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Vachovec1 (talk) 01:25, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Mailer diablo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Dbastro (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Dbastro (talk) 15:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Zdzislaw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Zdzislaw (talk) 16:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Proektir (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Proektir (talk) 16:49, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Antanana (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   アンタナナ 16:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  156. BORGATO Pierandrea (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   BORGATO Pierandrea (talk) 18:03, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Sujalajus (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Sujalajus (talk) 18:12, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Ahonc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Anatoliy (talk) 19:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Ліонкінг (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   per NickK Ліонкінг (talk) 23:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Gecko (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)   Gecko (talk) 02:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Quiddity (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Quiddity (talk) 02:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Muso (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Muso (talk) 04:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   rxy has been an active and dedicated member of the SWMT for many years and I think he'd a great steward. Snowolf How can I help? 07:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  163. K-iczn (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   K-iczn (talk) 13:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  No edit

  1. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Same arguments as Vogone, but for me, I oppose. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --Gereon K. (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Good SWMT member, but he just becomes active less than a month ago.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Background: He had be granted an admin right on JAWP in April 30, 2010, but he then self-resigned in August 25, 2010[1] over differences of opinion regarding policy document, that is, it is only four months during that he served as an admin on JAWP. He looked back on his past, going on to say that when he compares himself of today with his past shadow, he was a bit bureaucracy and that he was a person who felt betrayed by community on his own due to over expectation about our community. It triggered resignation. Again in July 7, 2011 he re-applied for an admin flag, and he then became an admin on JAWP. In November 25, 2012 he asked for a removing of his admin flag on JAWP, but it was canceled by himself. In the end, he resigned an admin on JAWP in October 25, 2014. Stewards always need to keep motivation high and their activity, but these records show that his motivation is too vague. So I oppose for now.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 06:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016  --Roland Kutzki (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Same arguments as Vogone, but for me, I oppose. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 15:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  7. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   O.Koslowski (talk) 16:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Widr (talk) 17:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hypergio (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   НУРшЯGIO(beware of the moose) 17:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. ArthurPSmith (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Jumping from inactive one year to steward the next doesn't seem appropriate. Maybe in a year. ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Asav (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Asav (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC) As per above; too little activity.[reply]
  12. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Armbrust (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Too soon after the inactivity. Miniapolis 20:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Mar del Este (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Mar del Este:)안녕하세요 (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   ChristophThomas (talk) 21:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   White Master (es) 22:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   no sysop experiences Hubertl (talk) 00:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Please read the aforementioned statement by Rxy, it outlines sysop experience on three wikimedia projects, one of which as a bureaucrat. Let's not forget he was also a global sysop. Riley Huntley (talk) 00:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Checkingfax (talk) 02:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Hkjacksonhk (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Removal of rights by own request makes me wonder why. Hedwig in Washington (talk) 04:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   David1010 (talk) 12:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   Lsanabria (talk) 13:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Gorlingor (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Holmium (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Holmium (talk) 14:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   --Hampcky (talk) 22:40, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ferran Mir (talk) 07:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Reception123 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   I think it is too soon to become a steward after just a month of become active again. Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 09:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016   Gag0409 (talk) 14:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Rax (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   --Rax (talk) 22:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Thogo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   be active in 2016, and run again next year. :) თოგო (D) 23:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   WSNT Alexmar983 (talk) 18:47, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Ringbang (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Ringbang (talk) 21:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Berlin-George (talk) 23:59, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. SideshowBob7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   SideshowBob7 (talk) 13:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Xatian11968 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Xatian11968 (talk) 17:20, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Timothycrice (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Timothycrice (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Goombiis (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   Goombiis (talk) 00:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Fordmadoxfraud (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   Ford MF (talk) 06:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Tonton Bernardo (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Missing Experience. Best regards to everyone. Tonton Bernardo (talk) 08:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC) Doubtful edits Tonton Bernardo (talk) 08:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC) some conflicts with Psychology ? I prefer to say No Tonton Bernardo (talk) 08:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Maleine258 (talk) 13:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. DerekvG (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   --DerekvG (talk) 16:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. The Traditionalist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   The Traditionalist (talk) 13:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Glane23 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Geoff Who, me? 22:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Rpclod (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Rpclod (talk) 00:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Styko (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Styko (talk) 07:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Lt2818 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Lt2818 (talk) 08:07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016   The Banner (talk) 14:15, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Hobbamock (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Hobbamock (talk) 14:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Neolexx (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   NeoLexx (talk) 18:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Lawrencedepe (Not eligible, checked by Ankry)   Lawrencedepe (talk) 09:18, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Base (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Contributions look like of the proper kind for a steward in terms of x-wikiness and CVN type, but I would like more for now. It's subjective, but when I see a user with less edits than I have running for a steward it makes me sceptical. Also per Vogone, returns from inactivity are better to be confirmed by lasting activity so that everybody is sure the user is truly back. Good luck next year, that all aside I like the candidature. Base (talk) 12:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Nnemo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Nnemo (talk) 13:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Ireas (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016   Ireas (talk) 13:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral edit

  1. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Clueful candidate, but unfortunately the absence in 2015 makes me unable to support this year. If Rxy manages to return to decent activity by the next elections, I will definitely support. --Vogone (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Looks useful but not sure enough to support. --Herby talk thyme 14:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Not sure yet. Mayby I change my vote if someone brings up good arguments why he should be supported. Natuur12 (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Ulflarsen (talk) 15:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Jahaza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Jahaza (talk) 15:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Żyrafał (talk) 16:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Concerns with activity, but otherwise a good candidate. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   per vogone Alan (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Nrautava (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Flyingfischer (talk) 18:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Mscuthbert (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Mscuthbert (talk) 19:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Reguyla (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   My only concern is the lack of activity for the last year. Other than that they seem to be a well qualified candidate. Reguyla (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Not enough to oppose (activity isn't necessarily much for me in this case), but you are quite suitable for the steward role imo Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   more activity would be nice eurodyne (talk) 02:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Hmm, political problems between Great China and Japan still exist, so far I can't support you, but per you very good past experience, neutral instead of oppose Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Does that mean you oppose him because he is from Japan and you from China? --MF-W 11:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, we already have a likely case called Cekli829, I don't want to see same case again. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   Deb (talk) 12:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   I wish to be more active in the future his/her. --Uğurkenttalk 16:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   per Vogone DCB (talk) 18:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   CLCStudent (talk) 19:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   Ernstol (talk) 19:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016   per above Ghiutun 22:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016   I trust Rxy, but he needs to show interest in renewed activity before I can support. Jasper Deng (talk) 23:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. 青子守歌 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Welcome back, Rxy! I'm happy to work with you again and I expect anti-vandalism of you. But I'm worry about that it's too soon after last inactivity, same as some oppose voters. I will vote "support" if you continued your work until next year's election. aokomoriuta (talk) 02:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Sj (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016   per Uğurkent. SJ talk  06:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Veleius
  26. Caballero1967 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Thinking about why so soon after inactivity, and about Infinite0694's information Caballero1967 (talk) 21:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   Rahmanuddin (talk) 15:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Kubura (Eligible, checked by )2016   Long experience, respect. But, I would like more of his editor and sysop activity, more continuity. Sudden stewardship after a period of inactivity is not the best solution. Kubura (talk) 05:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Wagino 20100516 (talk) 23:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   Eager Lin (Message) 05:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. VR0 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   VR0 (talk) 03:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Nannadeem (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Nannadeem (talk) 06:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. -revi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   He's clearly a good candidate but inactive through 2015 and running SE2016 suddenly is not a good sign, imo. Maybe in 2017. — regards, Revi 07:48, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. AdiMind (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016   AdiMind (talk) 18:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Ciberprofe (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Ciberprofe (talk) 01:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Krujoski (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   --Krujoski (talk) 18:22, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016   This candidate seems to have a good background, but I wish he would have answered the questions in more detail. Wpollard (talk) 07:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Fessor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Fessor (talk) 13:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. EmreDuran (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   EmreDuran (talk) 09:29, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Pratyeka (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016   +1 pragmatist, -1 perhaps too technically focused Pratyeka (talk) 06:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Lukaslt13 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   For this time, I vote as neutral.--Lukaslt13 (talk) 15:04, 20 February 2016 (UTC)Lukaslt13[reply]
  41. Wikifreund (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016   Wikifreund (talk) 16:55, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Wetterwolke (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Wetterwolke (talk) 19:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016   Per above DangSunM (talk) 20:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Gioto (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016   Gioto (talk) 02:21, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Ananth subray (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Ananth subray (talk) 12:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   VictorBrice (talk) 20:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Vimaparo147 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5)   Vimaparo147 (talk) 11:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. NoychoH (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016   NoychoH (talk) 12:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. ContributorQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   --ContributorQ (talk) 18:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016   Bernd Bergmann (talk) 19:59, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Defrenrokorit (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   Defrenrokorit (talk) 06:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016   ysjbserver (talk) 07:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]