Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/Rxy

< Stewards | Elections 2016
Warning

These steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Rxy

edit
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: ja, en-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello, everyone. I'm rxy (formerly known as Hosiryuhosi).

    I'm active at Japanese Wikipedia since 2008. Previously, I served as sysop and bureaucrat in that wiki, and served as sysop in meta and wikidata. In addition to this, I'm former global-sysop.

    Also as CVN staff, I manage CVNBots and IRC channels. This bots is used in SWMT.

    Reason for candidacy: We have many x-wiki vandals (e.g. spambot or LTA), but when I only having global-sysop rights, some x-wiki vandals cannot be stopped. Sometimes needed helping by stewards for global blocking and Locking CA account.

    if I elected, I'll be help to current stewards and everyone for fighting vandalism and handling various requests.

    I was inactive In 2015 for busy in real world, but I'll be active in 2016.

    Thank you for reading my statement.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#Rxy


  Yes

edit
  1. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --6AND5 (talk) 14:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Holder (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Even though Rxy does not hold adminship anywhere now, he has served in many local and global roles in the past without issue. He has been fighting crosswiki vandals longer than many of the current stewards. I have never had any concerns about his handling private information as evidenced by his requests for oversight. Rschen7754 15:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       GodeNehler (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  GodeNehler (talk) 16:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Sevimleribo (talk) 17:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  While taking into account Vogone's statement, I will vote yes because this user's past is a strong indication that he will do good use with the steward tools —Ah3kal (talk) 17:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       パン粉と片栗粉 (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  --パン粉と片栗粉 (talk) 17:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Net positive. OlEnglish (Talk) 20:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Wolmar (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Wolmar (talk) 21:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Riley Huntley (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Per Rschen7754. Riley Huntley (talk) 22:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Eman235 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Eman235/talk 23:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Zeljko (talk) 00:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  SQLQuery me! 00:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Has done a good job in the past. I believe that, as he says, he will be active this year and recognize it is important to have experienced Japanese speakers on the team. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 00:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. 目黒の隠居 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  He was administrator .and he is trusted 目黒の隠居 (talk) 02:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  HalanTul (talk) 02:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Good experience, and I recall seeing him active fighting vandalism back as Hosiryuhosi. I do hope that he will be more active this year as a steward — NickK (talk) 02:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. すじにくシチュー (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  すじにくシチュー (talk) 02:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Legoktm (talk) 03:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Yash! 04:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Agung.karjono (Not eligible, checked by Eurodyne) •  Agung.karjono (talk) 05:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. W.CC (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  He was a sysop and bureaucrat who had been trusted on the local project (jawp). not only as a grobal sysop W.CC (talk) 09:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. 水瀬悠志 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  自治に尽力を尽くして下さいませ。 水瀬悠志 (talk) 11:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Babymissfortune (talk) 11:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Shikai shaw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  shikai shaw (talk) 11:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Of course. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 12:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Bellcricket (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Bellcricket (talk) 12:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Kasir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Kasir talk 12:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Vinckie (talk) 12:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Gimmy dd (talk) 12:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Ellery (talk) 13:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  A strong yes from me. He has the necessary experience and is trusted. Plus I very much support more Asian users in the steward team. Trijnsteltalk 13:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 13:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  yes yes and yes. True candidate of quality (tools and knowledge and language), and able to help against East Asian vandals in the small wikis.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. RadiX (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  A suitable user for the role. He did a great job in the past. And we need a more diverse group of stewards to handle requests and local issues properly as they arise. RadiX∞ 16:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Trusted and experienced; knowing Japanese is also a plus Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       G2g886 (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  G2g886 (talk) 20:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Érico (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Érico (talk) 21:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Triglav (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Triglav (talk) 21:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Chiba ryo (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Chiba ryo (talk) 22:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Erne Mogilevich (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  I've checked some of his work on jawiki, and I think he could be one of the most appropiate candidates to be Steward. Congratulations for your work. Erne る Mogilevich (ノート • 投稿記録) 23:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Ghkdekdns71 (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016 •  Ghkdekdns71 (talk) 00:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone) •  Risk Engineer (talk) 00:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jon Harald Søby (talk) 02:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Wildcursive (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Wildcursive (talk) 02:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Lanwi1 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Lanwi1(Talk) 03:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. 馬面長伊奈 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  馬面長伊奈 (talk) 04:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. メルビル (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  メルビル (talk) 09:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  cyrfaw (talk) 12:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Defender (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Defender (talk) 12:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  He seems unpredictable, but I assume good faith. He is helpful and can certainly become very useful for the team. — T. 13:37, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Drzewianin (talk) 19:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Discussed with others. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  assuming the candidate will remain active Chris Troutman (talk) 00:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Waka Waka (talk) 01:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Syum90 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Yes Syum90 (talk) 10:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Kurihaya (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  I believe Rxy is a trustworthy guardian. Kurihaya (talk) 11:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Tucoxn (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  - tucoxn\talk 13:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Barras (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  I worked with the user in the past, even last year when he was not that active. He's will be a great steward and I'm sure he'd not apply if he wouldn't be sure to have enough time. -Barras talk 13:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Trurle (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Trurle (talk) 07:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  FASTILY 09:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016 •  Rberchie (talk) 11:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Damena (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Damena (talk) 13:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  The votes of Barras, Rschen7754 and Billinghurst indicate that this candidate should be supported. Natuur12 (talk) 18:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Hyolee2 (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  hyolee2/H.L.LEE (talk) 19:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Snaevar (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Has an global right (global rollback) and is experienced.--Snaevar (talk) 19:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Xoegki (Eligible, checked by 范)2016 •  Xoegki (talk) 04:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. B25es (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  B25es (talk) 09:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Wishds (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  Wishds (talk) 09:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Wikibenchris (talk) 11:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Carlotm (talk) 04:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Xx kyousuke xx (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Xx kyousuke xx (talk) 05:50, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. 隼鷹 (Eligible, checked by Melos)2016 •  隼鷹 (talk) 12:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Melos (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016 •  Melos (talk) 13:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Seedorfjohnny (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Seedorfjohnny (talk) 16:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Bluehotel (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Bluehotel (talk) 17:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Fuxx (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016 •  Fuxx (talk) 17:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  GZWDer (talk) 19:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Knowledgebattle (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Knowledgebattle (talk) 01:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Az1568 (talk) 02:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Spasage (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Spasage (talk) 07:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Ejs-80 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  –Ejs-80 08:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Caliburn (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Definately! Even though he was inactive last year, I trust that he will use the tools well this year :D Caliburn (talk) 09:26, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  – Meiræ 12:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Fraxinus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Fraxinus (talk) 12:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Sakoppi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Sakoppi (talk) 14:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Antoine.01 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Antoine.01 (talk) 15:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. LEANSER (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  LEANSER (talk) 18:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Yp8080123 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Yp8080123 (talk) 05:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Gonzo.Lubitsch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 07:10, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Experienced and language skills would be very useful Shanmugamp7 (talk) 08:15, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Hemeier (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Hemeier (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Hollingsworth (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Hollingsworth (talk) 21:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Courcelles 22:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. CaZeRillo (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  CaZeRillo (talk) 09:20, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Tufor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  tufor (talk) 18:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Matiia (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Matiia (talk) 18:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. عثمان منصور انصاري (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  عثمان منصور انصاري (talk) 20:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Robertiki (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Robertiki (talk) 04:55, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Ankry (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ankry (talk) 09:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Ocaso33 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ocaso33 (talk) 10:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Almost the most contributions of any steward candidate this year to the Wikiversities: 146, and some within a year (excellent)! --Marshallsumter (talk) 15:56, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Mirer (talk) 21:05, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Qewr4231 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Qewr4231 (talk) 21:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  99. MBurch (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  MBurch (talk) 03:45, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  Shizhao (talk) 07:47, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Octahedron80 (talk) 13:27, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Kusurija (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 • Kusurija (talk) 19:58, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Jusjih (talk) 00:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  104. NicatronTg (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  NicatronTg (talk) 03:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Cosine02 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Stang 05:37, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Pradeepabk (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  looks good Pradeepabk (talk) 11:13, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  106. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  KTo288 (talk) 14:04, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Odisha1 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Srikant Kedia 14:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       VisaBlack (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  VisaBlack (talk) 17:04, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Vituzzu (talk) 17:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  109. ~Expresses life (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  まSan [T•C•ES] 17:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Миша Карелин (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  M.Karelin (talk) 17:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Mathonius (Eligible, checked by Atcovi)2016 •  Mathonius (talk) 19:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Yotamsvoray (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Yotamsvoray (talk) 06:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Emin • message 07:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Taketa (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Trusted and experienced. Very usefull to have a steward with native Japanese language skills. Taketa (talk) 10:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  115. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 12:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  116. BluesyPete (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  BluesyPete (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Generally I believe in people. Taivo (talk) 18:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Arbnos (talk) 18:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Höyhens (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Höyhens (talk) 23:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Abrikoss (Not eligible, checked by Syum90) •  Abrikoss (talk) 08:16, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  per Rschen7754 Pratyya (Hello!) 14:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Yair rand (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Yair rand (talk) 20:32, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Timk70 question? 21:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Harlock81 (talk) 22:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Boshomi (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Boshomi (talk) 23:09, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 23:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Ccgxk (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Ccgxk (talk) 06:34, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Bogger (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Bogger (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Y-dash (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Y-dash 13:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Glaisher (talk) 17:38, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Luuva (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Luuva (talk) 18:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Stephen Allcroft (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Stephen Allcroft (talk) 18:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Bmhs823 (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  Bmhs823 (talk) 08:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Kadavr2000 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Kadavr2000 (talk) 10:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Виолетова (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  Виолетова (talk) 13:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  134. K6ka (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:32, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Yodaspirine (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Yodaspirine (talk) 20:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Arn (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Arn (talk) 21:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Pcnavod (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Pcnavod (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Zyephyrus (talk) 00:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  139. taweetham (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Taweethaも (talk) 03:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Bennylin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Valuable linguistic background, no doubt, to handle issues pertaining ja.wp. My main concern is will this user be able to communicate with other stewards well with his English. But, support from me nonetheless because I think he's more than 'en-1' that he declared. ✒ Bennylin 04:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  141. PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 09:31, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Bio06940 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Bio06940 (talk) 12:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Vilkapi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Vilkapi (talk) 17:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Aydinsalis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Aydinsalis (talk) 22:43, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Caiaffa (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Caiaffa (talk) 05:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Eltargrim (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Eltargrim (talk) 15:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Lutzv (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Lutzv (talk) 16:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  149. MirkoS18 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  MirkoS18 (talk) 20:59, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Romayan (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Romayan (talk) 21:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Jabberwoch (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jabberwoch (talk) 23:13, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Vachovec1 (talk) 01:25, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Mailer diablo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Dbastro (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Dbastro (talk) 15:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Zdzislaw (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Zdzislaw (talk) 16:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Proektir (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Proektir (talk) 16:49, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Antanana (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  アンタナナ 16:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  156. BORGATO Pierandrea (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  BORGATO Pierandrea (talk) 18:03, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Sujalajus (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Sujalajus (talk) 18:12, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Ahonc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Anatoliy (talk) 19:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Ліонкінг (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  per NickK Ліонкінг (talk) 23:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Gecko (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Gecko (talk) 02:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Quiddity (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Quiddity (talk) 02:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Muso (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Muso (talk) 04:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  rxy has been an active and dedicated member of the SWMT for many years and I think he'd a great steward. Snowolf How can I help? 07:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  163. K-iczn (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  K-iczn (talk) 13:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Same arguments as Vogone, but for me, I oppose. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Gereon K. (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Infinite0694 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Good SWMT member, but he just becomes active less than a month ago.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Background: He had be granted an admin right on JAWP in April 30, 2010, but he then self-resigned in August 25, 2010[1] over differences of opinion regarding policy document, that is, it is only four months during that he served as an admin on JAWP. He looked back on his past, going on to say that when he compares himself of today with his past shadow, he was a bit bureaucracy and that he was a person who felt betrayed by community on his own due to over expectation about our community. It triggered resignation. Again in July 7, 2011 he re-applied for an admin flag, and he then became an admin on JAWP. In November 25, 2012 he asked for a removing of his admin flag on JAWP, but it was canceled by himself. In the end, he resigned an admin on JAWP in October 25, 2014. Stewards always need to keep motivation high and their activity, but these records show that his motivation is too vague. So I oppose for now.--Infinite0694 (Talk) 06:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Roland Kutzki (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Same arguments as Vogone, but for me, I oppose. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 15:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  7. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 16:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Widr (talk) 17:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Hypergio (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  НУРшЯGIO(beware of the moose) 17:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. ArthurPSmith (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Jumping from inactive one year to steward the next doesn't seem appropriate. Maybe in a year. ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Asav (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Asav (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC) As per above; too little activity.[reply]
  12. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Armbrust (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Too soon after the inactivity. Miniapolis 20:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Mar del Este (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Mar del Este:)안녕하세요 (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  ChristophThomas (talk) 21:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  White Master (es) 22:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  no sysop experiences Hubertl (talk) 00:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Please read the aforementioned statement by Rxy, it outlines sysop experience on three wikimedia projects, one of which as a bureaucrat. Let's not forget he was also a global sysop. Riley Huntley (talk) 00:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Checkingfax (talk) 02:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hkjacksonhk (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Removal of rights by own request makes me wonder why. Hedwig in Washington (talk) 04:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  David1010 (talk) 12:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Lsanabria (talk) 13:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Gorlingor (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Holmium (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Holmium (talk) 14:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Hampcky (talk) 22:40, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 07:49, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Reception123 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  I think it is too soon to become a steward after just a month of become active again. Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 09:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016 •  Gag0409 (talk) 14:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Rax (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Rax (talk) 22:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Thogo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  be active in 2016, and run again next year. :) თოგო (D) 23:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  WSNT Alexmar983 (talk) 18:47, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Ringbang (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ringbang (talk) 21:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Berlin-George (talk) 23:59, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. SideshowBob7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  SideshowBob7 (talk) 13:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Xatian11968 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Xatian11968 (talk) 17:20, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Timothycrice (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Timothycrice (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Goombiis (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Goombiis (talk) 00:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Fordmadoxfraud (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Ford MF (talk) 06:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Tonton Bernardo (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Missing Experience. Best regards to everyone. Tonton Bernardo (talk) 08:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC) Doubtful edits Tonton Bernardo (talk) 08:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC) some conflicts with Psychology ? I prefer to say No Tonton Bernardo (talk) 08:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Maleine258 (talk) 13:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. DerekvG (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  --DerekvG (talk) 16:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. The Traditionalist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  The Traditionalist (talk) 13:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Glane23 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Geoff Who, me? 22:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Rpclod (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Rpclod (talk) 00:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Styko (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Styko (talk) 07:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Lt2818 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Lt2818 (talk) 08:07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  The Banner (talk) 14:15, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Hobbamock (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Hobbamock (talk) 14:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Neolexx (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  NeoLexx (talk) 18:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Lawrencedepe (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Lawrencedepe (talk) 09:18, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Base (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Contributions look like of the proper kind for a steward in terms of x-wikiness and CVN type, but I would like more for now. It's subjective, but when I see a user with less edits than I have running for a steward it makes me sceptical. Also per Vogone, returns from inactivity are better to be confirmed by lasting activity so that everybody is sure the user is truly back. Good luck next year, that all aside I like the candidature. Base (talk) 12:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Nnemo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Nnemo (talk) 13:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Ireas (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  Ireas (talk) 13:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Clueful candidate, but unfortunately the absence in 2015 makes me unable to support this year. If Rxy manages to return to decent activity by the next elections, I will definitely support. --Vogone (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Looks useful but not sure enough to support. --Herby talk thyme 14:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Not sure yet. Mayby I change my vote if someone brings up good arguments why he should be supported. Natuur12 (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ulflarsen (talk) 15:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Jahaza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Jahaza (talk) 15:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Żyrafał (talk) 16:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Concerns with activity, but otherwise a good candidate. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  per vogone Alan (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Nrautava (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Flyingfischer (talk) 18:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Mscuthbert (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Mscuthbert (talk) 19:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Reguyla (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  My only concern is the lack of activity for the last year. Other than that they seem to be a well qualified candidate. Reguyla (talk) 19:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Not enough to oppose (activity isn't necessarily much for me in this case), but you are quite suitable for the steward role imo Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  more activity would be nice eurodyne (talk) 02:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hmm, political problems between Great China and Japan still exist, so far I can't support you, but per you very good past experience, neutral instead of oppose Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Does that mean you oppose him because he is from Japan and you from China? --MF-W 11:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, we already have a likely case called Cekli829, I don't want to see same case again. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:53, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Deb (talk) 12:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  I wish to be more active in the future his/her. --Uğurkenttalk 16:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  per Vogone DCB (talk) 18:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  CLCStudent (talk) 19:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Ernstol (talk) 19:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  per above Ghiutun 22:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  I trust Rxy, but he needs to show interest in renewed activity before I can support. Jasper Deng (talk) 23:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. 青子守歌 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Welcome back, Rxy! I'm happy to work with you again and I expect anti-vandalism of you. But I'm worry about that it's too soon after last inactivity, same as some oppose voters. I will vote "support" if you continued your work until next year's election. aokomoriuta (talk) 02:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Sj (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  per Uğurkent. –SJ talk  06:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Veleius
  26. Caballero1967 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Thinking about why so soon after inactivity, and about Infinite0694's information Caballero1967 (talk) 21:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Rahmanuddin (talk) 15:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Kubura (Eligible, checked by 范)2016 •  Long experience, respect. But, I would like more of his editor and sysop activity, more continuity. Sudden stewardship after a period of inactivity is not the best solution. Kubura (talk) 05:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 23:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Eager Lin (Message) 05:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. VR0 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  VR0 (talk) 03:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Nannadeem (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Nannadeem (talk) 06:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. -revi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  He's clearly a good candidate but inactive through 2015 and running SE2016 suddenly is not a good sign, imo. Maybe in 2017. — regards, Revi 07:48, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. AdiMind (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  AdiMind (talk) 18:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Ciberprofe (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Ciberprofe (talk) 01:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Krujoski (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  --Krujoski (talk) 18:22, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  This candidate seems to have a good background, but I wish he would have answered the questions in more detail. Wpollard (talk) 07:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Fessor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Fessor (talk) 13:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. EmreDuran (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  EmreDuran (talk) 09:29, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Pratyeka (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  +1 pragmatist, -1 perhaps too technically focused Pratyeka (talk) 06:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Lukaslt13 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  For this time, I vote as neutral.--Lukaslt13 (talk) 15:04, 20 February 2016 (UTC)Lukaslt13[reply]
  41. Wikifreund (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016 •  Wikifreund (talk) 16:55, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Wetterwolke (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Wetterwolke (talk) 19:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Per above DangSunM (talk) 20:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Gioto (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Gioto (talk) 02:21, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Ananth subray (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Ananth subray (talk) 12:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  VictorBrice (talk) 20:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Vimaparo147 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Vimaparo147 (talk) 11:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. NoychoH (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  NoychoH (talk) 12:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. ContributorQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  --ContributorQ (talk) 18:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Bernd Bergmann (talk) 19:59, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Defrenrokorit (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Defrenrokorit (talk) 06:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  ysjbserver (talk) 07:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2016/Votes/Rxy&oldid=27477029"