Ombudskommisjonen

This page is a translated version of the page Ombuds commission and the translation is 6% complete.

For legal and security reasons, the Wikimedia Foundation has decided to require two-factor authentication for this role.

På vegne av Wikimedia Foundations styre undersøker ombudskommisjonen varsler om brudd på personvernspolicyen, policyen for tilgang til ikke-offentlige personlige data, IP-kontrollør-policyen og sensurpolicyen på alle Wikimedia-prosjekter. På vegne av styret undersøker de også at lokale IP-kontrollør- og sensur-policyer er i samsvar med de globale policyene for IP-kontrollører og sensur.

	About the commission — Make a report — Email the commission — Discuss the commission
	Activity reports: 2024 • 2023 • 2022 • Earlier Published decisions

Oppgaver

In addition to official investigation, they will mediate between the complainant and the respondent (usually a CheckUser , oversighter, bureaucrat , Administrator , or arbitration committee member). When legally necessary, the ombuds will assist the General Counsel, the Executive Director or the board in handling the case.

When the case is litigious, the ombuds will be in charge of educating CheckUsers or others about the Foundation's privacy policy. When the Privacy Policy, Access to Nonpublic Information Policy, CheckUser Policy, or Oversight policy have been breached, the ombuds commission should report to the Executive Director or designated staff and recommend a course of action (such as removal of access to tools). Additionally, the commission might suggest suitable changes to policies or software.

Neutrality

An ombuds' investigation should be conducted in a manner determined by the ombuds to ensure fairness and impartiality. As a general guideline, it is best that ombuds avoid conflicts of interest as much as possible, particularly by avoiding routine use of CheckUser or oversight access and not processing complaints on the projects on which they are very active editors. However, matters that come before the commission are not clear-cut, and the language and culture of various projects may pose barriers to outsiders. As such, how the commission investigates complaints is left to the discretion of its appointed members.

Membership

Members of the ombuds commission are selected from the Wikimedia community by Wikimedia Foundation officials. A call for volunteers is issued each year in early October on the Wikimedia-L mailing list and on the talk page of this policy, as well as other project forums as appropriate. They are appointed (assuming they agree) for a period of approximately two years (one year, prior to the 2023–25 Commission). One or more non-voting alternate member(s) may also be appointed. A Steward-Observer may be appointed to serve alongside the Ombudspeople.

Current members

User	Home wiki(s)	Language spoken	IRC nick	Term expires
だ＊ぜ (CA)	zhwiki	zh, yue, wuu, lzh, en-4, ja-3	`Dasze`	2026
Ameisenigel (CA)	dewiki, wikidatawiki	de, en-4, nds-2, fr-1, tlh-1	`Ameisenigel`	2026
Arcticocean (CA)		en, sco-3, es-2, gd-1		2026
Daniuu (CA) *	nlwiki	nl, en-4, de-2, fr-2, la-2, vls-2, li-1	`Daniuu`	2025
Emufarmers (CA)	enwiki	en, la-2	`Emufarmers`	2026
Faendalimas (CA)	wikispecies	en, pt-3, it-2, fr-1	`faendalimas`	2026
MdsShakil (CA)	bnwiki, bnwikibooks	bn, en-3, as-1	`MdsShakil`	2025
Minorax (CA)	commonswiki, metawiki, simplewiktionary, wikidatawiki	en-5, zh-5, nan-2, fr-1, ko-1, ms-1, yue-1	`Minorax`	2025
Nehaoua (CA)	arwiki, frwiki	ar-n, fr-4, en-2		2026
Renvoy (CA)	ukwiki	uk, ru-4, en-3, pl-3, lt-1		2026
RoySmith (CA)	enwiki	en	`roy649`	2026
Vermont (CA) ‡	enwiki, metawiki, simplewiki	en, ru-2, es-1	`Vermont`	2025

† Advisory member; ‡ Steward-Observer; * Chair, terms expire in February of listed year

For previous members, see here.

See also automatically generated list. This list is generated from the global ombudsman user group. This grants commission members the following rights on all Wikimedia wikis:

List of global user rights (click to expand or collapse)

Vise skjulte misbruksloggoppføringer (abusefilter-hidden-log)
Vise misbruksloggen (abusefilter-log)
Vise detaljerte punkter i misbruksloggen (abusefilter-log-detail)
Vise loggoppføringer for redigeringsfiltere som har blitt markert som private (abusefilter-log-private)
Vise privat informasjon i misbruksloggen (abusefilter-privatedetails))
Vise tilgangsloggen for private detaljer i misbruksfilteret (abusefilter-privatedetails-log)
Se logger som gjelder tilgang til beskyttede variabelverdier (abusefilter-protected-vars-log)
Vise redigeringsfiltere (abusefilter-view)
Vis redigeringsfiltre merket privat (abusefilter-view-private)
Søke i slettede sider (browsearchive)
Sjekke brukeres IP-adresser og annen informasjon (checkuser)
Se IP-kontrolloggen (checkuser-log)
Vise loggen over tilganger til midlertidige kontoers IP-adresser (checkuser-temporary-account-log)
Vise IP-adresser som brukes av midlertidige kontoer uten å måtte huke av for det i innstillingene (checkuser-temporary-account-no-preference)
Se slettet sidehistorikk uten tilhørende sidetekst (deletedhistory)
Se slettet tekst og endringer mellom slettede sideversjoner. (deletedtext)
Vise en logg over hvem som har hentet IP-informasjon (ipinfo-view-log)
Slå på tofaktorautentisering (oathauth-enable)
Se private logger (suppressionlog)
Se sideversjoner som er skjult for alle brukere (viewsuppressed)

Submission

Complaints may be made to the ombuds commission through the following ways (preferably in a language spoken by one of the members):

To use the form, access this link: Special:Contact/ombudscommission
To write an email, access this link: Special:EmailUser/Ombuds commission

Both ways will send message directly to OC mailing list.

Please follow these guidelines when submitting an inquiry to the commission:

Be concise: Lengthy emails with unnecessary information make it harder for the commission to process the case in a timely manner.
Be objective: Avoid making inquiries based on speculations or subjective judgements.
Provide evidence: Please provide us with diff links and/or permanent links when possible.
Be specific: Specify what part of which policy has been violated.
Please inform us if your wiki has an Arbitration Committee (or a similar committee) and if you have reached them (or used other dispute resolution procedure customary to your community) before reaching the ombuds commission. Provide a link to the relevant case page if appropriate.

Processing/Reporting

Cases brought to our attention will be processed the following way:

Confirmation of the request: We will send a notice of confirmation to the requester, and if necessary ask for further information.
Scope: If the request is within the scope of the ombuds commission, we will do the investigation, if not we will decline the request and try to direct the complainant to a better place to get help for their individual problem.
Investigation: We do whatever is necessary to find out whether or not there was a breach of the policies or a non-compliance or conflict of local policies with the global ones.
Result: We give the result of our investigation to the requester, and if there was indeed a breach of the privacy policy, we will inform the user who was investigated and if necessary inform the Board of Trustees and if necessary recommend removing OS, CU or steward rights from the user breaking the policy.

Past decisions

Where the Commission has reached a decision which has significance for the wider community, it may publish it publicly. The decisions currently published are:

IP block exemptions (2016/42).
Disclosure of information (2019/125) (2019/122) (2019/121) (2019/138) – this decision outlined the circumstances where a checkuser may disclose information they have obtained through their privileged access.
Functionaries banned on other projects (2024/230) – dealing with a scenario where a volunteer banned from one wiki (or otherwise becoming untrusted) continues to have access rights on another wiki.
French Wikipedia Nominations Committee (2019/129) (2020/160) (2021/173).

Reference numbers (in brackets) are given for the convenience of commissioners – they are the internal reference numbers of the case which led to the decision. Some published decisions will resolve several cases.

Activity reports

Activities:

in 2013: February–June, July–December.
in 2014: January–June, July–December.
in 2015: January–June, July–December.
in 2016: January–June, July–December.
in 2017: January–June, July–December.
in 2018: January–June, July–December.
in 2019: January–June, July–September, October–December.
2020 Commission: January-March, April-January 2021.
2021 Commission: February-April, May-July, August-October, November-January 2022.
2022 Commission: February-April, May-July, August-October, November-January 2023.
2023 Commission: February-April, May-July, August-October, November-January 2024.
2024 Commission: February-April, May-July, August-October.