Komisija prokuratora

This page is a translated version of the page Ombuds commission and the translation is 8% complete.
Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎Cymraeg • ‎Deutsch • ‎Deutsch (Sie-Form) • ‎English • ‎Esperanto • ‎Lëtzebuergesch • ‎Nederlands • ‎Ripoarisch • ‎Scots • ‎Sunda • ‎Tagalog • ‎Tiếng Việt • ‎Türkçe • ‎Zazaki • ‎asturianu • ‎català • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎euskara • ‎français • ‎hrvatski • ‎italiano • ‎lietuvių • ‎magyar • ‎occitan • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎română • ‎slovenčina • ‎suomi • ‎svenska • ‎čeština • ‎български • ‎русский • ‎українська • ‎հայերեն • ‎עברית • ‎العربية • ‎سنڌي • ‎فارسی • ‎پښتو • ‎नेपाली • ‎বাংলা • ‎ગુજરાતી • ‎தமிழ் • ‎తెలుగు • ‎മലയാളം • ‎ไทย • ‎မြန်မာဘာသာ • ‎中文 • ‎日本語 • ‎粵語 • ‎한국어
Ombuds Commission
Wikimedia Ombuds logo.svg
Activity reports

Komisija prokuratora, u ime Skrbničkoga odbora , istražuje žalbe o kršenju pravila privatnosti, pravila o pristupu nejavnim osobnim podatcima, općih pravila upotrebe oruđa za provjeritelje i nadgledničkih pravila, na svim projektima Wikimedije. Članice i članovi komisije također istražuju, za potrebe Odbora, o sukladnosti lokalnih pravila o upotrebi oruđa za provjeritelje ili lokalnih nadgledničkih pravila odnosno smjernica s globalnim općim pravilima upotrebe oruđa za provjeritelje i globalnim nadgledničkim pravilima.


In addition to official investigation, they will mediate between the complainant and the respondent (usually a CheckUser , oversighter , bureaucrat , administrator , or arbitration committee member). When legally necessary, the ombuds will assist the General Counsel, the Executive Director or the board in handling the case.

When the case is litigious, the ombuds will be in charge of educating CheckUsers or others about the Foundation's privacy policy. When the Privacy Policy, Access to Nonpublic Information Policy, CheckUser Policy, or Oversight policy have been breached, the Ombuds Commission should report to the Executive Director or designated staff and recommend a course of action (such as removal of access to tools). Additionally, the commission might suggest suitable changes to policies or software.


An ombuds' investigation should be conducted in a manner determined by the ombuds to ensure fairness and impartiality. As a general guideline, it is best that ombuds avoid conflicts of interest as much as possible, particularly by avoiding routine use of CheckUser or oversight access and not processing complaints on the projects on which they are very active editors. However, matters that come before the commission are not clear-cut, and the language and culture of various projects may pose barriers to outsiders. As such, how the commission investigates complaints is left to the discretion of its appointed members.


Members of the ombuds commission are selected from the Wikimedia community by Wikimedia Foundation officials. A call for volunteers is issued each year in early December on the Wikimedia-L mailing list and on the talk page of this policy, as well as other project forums as appropriate. They are appointed (assuming they agree) for a period of approximately one year. A non-voting alternate member may be appointed to serve for one year, with an expectation for a seat as a full member the following year.

Assigned rights

Ombuds have the following rights globally, among others:

  • Traženje obrisanih stranica (browsearchive)
  • Provjeravanje IP adrese suradnika i drugih informacija (checkuser)
  • Gledanje evidencije provjere suradnika (checkuser-log)
  • Gledanje povijesti izmjena izbrisane stranice (deletedhistory)
  • Pregled izbrisanog teksta i izmjena između izbrisanih izmjena (deletedtext)
  • Gledanje privatnih evidencija (suppressionlog)
  • Prikaži izmjene skrivene od svih suradnika (viewsuppressed)

Current members

See also automatically generated list (terms expire February 2022):

User Home wiki(s) Language spoken IRC nick
Acagastya (CA) enwikinews hi, gu, en-4, es-2, sa-2, ar-1, fr-1, mr-1, ur-1 acagastya
AGK (CA) enwiki en, sco-3, es-2, gd-1 agk-wiki
Ajraddatz (CA) metawiki, wikidata en, fr-2 Ajraddatz
Ameisenigel (CA) dewiki de, en-4, nds-2, fr-1 Ameisenigel
Emufarmers (CA) enwiki en, la-2 emufarmers
Faendalimas (CA) wikispecies en, pt-3, it-2, fr-1 faendalimas
Galahad (CA) eswikivoyage es, en-1 Galahad
JJMC89 (CA) enwiki en JJMC89
Moheen (CA) bnwiki bn, ctg, en-3 MoheenReeyad
MrJaroslavik (CA) cswiki cs, en-3, sk-3 MrJaroslavik
ProtoplasmaKid (CA) eswiki es, en-3, pt-3 -
Superpes15 (CA) itwiki it, en-2, es-1, fr-1, la-1 Superpes

For the prior membership, see here.


Complaints may be made to the Ombuds Commission through the following ways (preferably in a language spoken by one of the members):

Both ways will send message directly to OC mailing list.

Please follow these guidelines when submitting an inquiry to the commission:

  1. Be concise. Lengthy emails with unnecessary information make it harder for the commission to process the case in a timely manner.
  2. Be objective. Avoid making inquiries based on speculations or subjective judgements.
  3. Provide evidence. Please provide us with diff links and/or permanent links when possible.
  4. Be specific. Specify what part of which policy has been violated.
  5. Please inform us if your wiki has an Arbitration Committee (or a similar committee) and if you have reached them (or used other dispute resolution procedure customary to your community) before reaching the Ombuds Commission. Provide a link to the relevant case page if appropriate.


Cases brought to our attention will be processed the following way:

  1. Confirmation of the request: we will send a notice of confirmation to the requester, and if necessary ask for further information.
  2. Scope: if the request is within the scope of the Ombuds Commission, we will do the investigation, if not we will decline the request and try to direct the complainant to a better place to get help for his/her individual problem.
  3. Investigation: We do whatever is necessary to find out whether or not there was a breach of the policies or a non-compliance or conflict of local policies with the global ones.
  4. Result: We give the result of our investigation to the requester, and if there was indeed a breach of the privacy policy, we will inform the user who was investigated and if necessary inform the Board of Trustees and if necessary recommend removing OS, CU or steward rights from the user breaking the policy.

Activity reports


See also