Stewards/Elections 2015/Votes/Einsbor

Einsbor edit

ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: pl, en-3, fr-2
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello!

    I'm Einsbor from Warsaw, Poland. I had begun contributing to Wikimedia projects in 2012, became more active in 2013. My contributions are focused in general on recent changes patrolling, fighting vandalism and long-term abuse, mostly on plwiki, but I also help in global countervandalism work. I am an admin, oversighter, member of local ArbCom at plwiki and OTRS member. Because I still feel that with my skills and knowledge I can do more for Wikimedia projects, I decided to apply for stewardship.

    Due to the fact that I have relatively little cross-wiki vandalism and spam fighting experience, if elected, I want to help mostly with oversight, checkuser, permissions requests and LTA fighting. On plwiki we have a problem with an LTA user - Wikinger. Due to his abusive activity (including libelous contribs) a few Polish providers had been banned globally (a few times) by a former Polish steward, a lot of open proxies have been banned. Now I give work for stewards - if elected, I will be able to do it by myself.

    I live, as I wrote before, in Warsaw (CET), but due to the character of my occupation, I'm active at various times - night, early morning, evenings - depends on the shift. While online, I'm reachable at #wikimedia-stewards, #cvn-wp-pl, #cvn-sw, #wikipedia-pl channels. I speak Polish as my native language, English at a decent level and basic French. I have read, understand and fully accept steward, oversight, checkuser and privacy policy.

    In nonwiki reality, I am an automation engineer.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2015/Questions#Einsbor
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

  Yes edit

  1. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Of course. Very helpful and trustworthy user. Żyrafał (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Answers are fine. Vogone (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. George.Edward.C (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Good candidate whom I've conversed with in the past. Seems trustworthy, and experienced in the areas of cross-wiki anti-vandalism and anti-spam. George.Edward.C (talk) 18:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Sebada11 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Good candidate. Sebada11 (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Emptywords (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   No doubts. Emptywords (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. KillFighter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   All fine ;) ~KillFighter Speak? 18:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Ptjackyll (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Ptjackyll (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Michał Sobkowski (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Michał Sobkowski (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Wpedzich (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   An avid Wikinger-hunter, whom we actually do need in the current situation. Apart from this obvious need for a fast-reacting steward, a user with a steep learning curve whom I've personally seen to adminship and beyond. Can be seen online at hours where we, central Europeans sleep soundly, which is yet another advantage. And a cool person to be around with, to boot. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 18:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Trusted Eurodyne (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Boston9 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Great candidate on -> all fronts! Boston9 (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Teukros (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Teukros (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Stanko (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Stanko (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Stefaniak (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Stefaniak (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC) Polish mob in full swing :) utter trust in your capabilities, just hope you won't get jaded before your time.[reply]
  15. Nedops (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Nedops (talk) 18:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Emin message 18:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Hardenacke (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Hardenacke (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Great candidate :) –Davey2010Talk 18:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Roxyuru (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Good candidate. --Roxyuru 18:48, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Aldnonymous (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Edit conflict 3 times! Would you believe that? Many people supporting you Einsbor!--AldNonBicara? 18:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. NahidSultan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   ~ Nahid Talk 18:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Jeremy77186 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Jeremy77186 (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Ejensyd (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Ejensyd (talk) 19:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Asav (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Simply a good steward. Asav (talk) 19:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Levi bernardo (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   --Levi bernardo (talk) 19:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Semso98 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Semso98 (talk) 19:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Green Giant (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Decent answers to questions. Cross-wiki experience is a must but there is no minimum limit before someone is eligible for stewardship. Green Giant (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  28. The boss (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   The boss (talk) 19:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Fenikals (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)   Fenikals (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Yurek88 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Yurek88 (talk) 19:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Saileshpat (Not eligible, checked by Savh)   Saileshpat (talk) 19:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Jacek555 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Jacek555 (talk) 19:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Elfhelm (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Elfhelm (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Wieralee (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Wieralee (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Fork me (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)   Fork me (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  33. The Polish (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   The Polish (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Piotr967 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Piotr967 (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Rzuwig 20:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Obelix (talk) 20:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Mirer (talk) 20:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Rome2 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Rome2 (talk) 20:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Polimerek (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Polimerek (talk) 20:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Yodaspirine (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Yodaspirine (talk) 20:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Chicbyaccident (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Chicbyaccident (talk) 20:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Pnapora (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Pnapora (talk) 21:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  43. D kuba (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   D kuba (talk) 21:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  44. PawełMM (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   PawełMM (talk) 21:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Devwebtel (Not eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)   Devwebtel (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Armbrust (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  46. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   PiRSquared17 (talk) 22:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Pit rock (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Hope you'll be at the helm. Pit rock (talk) 22:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  48. NickK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Although cross-wiki activity is not extraordinary, answers are good, and I think a candidate will be a good steward — NickK (talk) 22:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Mazuritz (talk) 22:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Barras (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Looks like a good candidate to me! -Barras talk 22:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Rax (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   experienced, able to answer substantially, no counter ad - ok Rax (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Kolega2357 (talk) 22:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  53. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   DangSunM (talk) 22:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Courcelles 23:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Moony22 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Very comprehensive answers. Candidate seems well qualified and understands the requirements for stewardship. Hardly any doubts. Moony22 (talk) 23:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Chess (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Great candidate, but if you are elected, please do more cross-wiki work. You have enough, but you should allay the fears of others by doing some more crosswiki work. Chess (talk) 23:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Daemon2010 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Daemon2010 (talk) 23:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   This person is really only active on Polish Wikipedia. They have a few hundred edits at Simple English and Wikidata, and about 150 on Commons. I have reservations about this person being ready for any problem but they meet my minimal expectations, and I see no evidence that they have a history of doing anything troublesome. Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Arth M (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   No doubts! Arth M (talk) 00:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Woodshed (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Woodshed (talk) 01:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Augurmm (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Augurmm (talk) 02:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Jusjih (talk) 03:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Albertus Aditya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Albertus Aditya (talk) 03:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Inks.LWC (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Inks.LWC (talk) 05:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Xoristzatziki (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Xoristzatziki (talk) 05:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Lacks some cross-wiki experience but overall a good candidate. Ajraddatz (talk) 05:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  68. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  70. MatiOmlet (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   responsible candidate, known from Polish Wikipedia, which needs help to get better MatiOmlet (talk) 08:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Doctore (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Doctore (talk) 08:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Quodvultdeus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Right man for right job, his availability is a great advantage Quodvultdeus (talk) 10:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  73. MOs810 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   MOs810 (talk) 10:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Kggucwa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Kggucwa (talk) 10:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  75. PMG (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   PMG (talk) 10:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Rberchie (talk) 11:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Ethically Yours (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Ethically Yours (talk) 11:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Alexey88 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Alexey88 (talk) 12:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Stigfinnare (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Stigfinnare (talk) 12:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Maestro Ivanković (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Maestro Ivanković (talk) 12:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Qualified user who eagerly wants to help. Will surely be a good steward imo. Trijnsteltalk 12:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  82. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   NaBUru38 (talk) 13:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Nastoshka (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Very good candidate imo Nastoshka (talk) 13:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Austral blizzard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Austral blizzard (talk) 14:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Tufor (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   helpful, experienced, trustworthy, very active user. Very good answers to my questions. He will be great steward hands down. Tufor (talk) 14:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  86. AmaryllisGardener (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   AmaryllisGardener talk 14:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Kroji (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Kroji (talk) 15:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  88. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Will hopefully swift his focus on other steward tasks too which we can see once he's elected. —DerHexer (Talk) 15:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Suriyaa Kudo (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Suriyaa Kudo (talk) 16:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  90. TomášPolonec (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   TomášPolonec (talk) 17:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Nawider (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Nawider (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Magalia (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Magalia (talk) 18:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   AGF. Southparkfan 18:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Miniapolis (talk) 18:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Hannes_24 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   --Hannes 24 (talk) 18:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Nezdek (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Nezdek (talk) 18:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Mpn (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   very inteligent person Mpn (talk) 19:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Xania (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   I'm satisfied with this user's description and responses to the questions he was asked. Xania (talk) 20:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Kilith (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Kilith (talk) 20:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Ray Van De Walker (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Ray Van De Walker (talk) 20:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Litlok (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Litlok (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Demonstrates good knowledge of the policies for the function and interest in learning what you don't know with the more experienced Stewards. Good luck! Leon saudanha (talk) 22:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Серега Спартак (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Серега Спартак (talk) 23:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Kalinowski (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Kalinowski (talk) 00:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Be..anyone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   A spam fighter with some clues, have fun. –Be..anyone (talk) 01:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Shizhao (talk) 02:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  107. PP2014 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   PP2014 (talk) 03:39, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   FASTILY 05:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Kelvin (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Kelvin (talk) 07:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Bookvaedina (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Bookvaedina (talk) 09:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Holder (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Holder (talk) 11:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Green Zero (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   — Green Zero обг 12:37, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  113. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   No major concerns. CT Cooper · talk 14:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Bladyniec (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Tomasz Bladyniec (talk) 14:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Kantatiskiwa (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Du sang neuf, contre partie d'une expérience limitée Kantatiskiwa (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  116. IJA (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   IJA (talk) 15:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Maire (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   A trustworthy and hardworking user :). Maire 20:39, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Andre S. (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Andre S. (talk) 21:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Masti (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   masti <dyskusja> 22:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Steschke (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Fingerspitzengefühl bei der Arbeit wird er ja wohl haben. ST 22:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Alan ffm (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Alan ffm (talk) 23:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Ffkapa (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Ffkapa (talk) 23:25, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Pawel Niemczuk (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Pawel Niemczuk (talk) 23:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Theredmonkey (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   trm 23:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Elcobbola (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Эlcobbola talk 00:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Tiptoety (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Tiptoety talk 00:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Marcus Cyron (talk) 04:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  128. GeoO (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   geo ») 06:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Az1568 (talk) 06:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   This person has been in good standing and answered the questions politely and thoughtfully. Wpollard (talk) 07:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Matanya (talk) 07:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Torne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Torne (talk) 10:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Padawane (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   P@d@w@ne 10:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Y 6 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Y 6 (talk) 10:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Widr (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Widr (talk) 10:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Ghilt (talk) 12:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Jon Harald Søby (talk) 12:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Gonzolito (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Experienced and voluntary, good answers. Gonzolito (talk) 13:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  139. K6ka (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   A bit more cross-wiki activity would be desirable, but other than that, you are capable of being a steward. Good luck! --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 13:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Abaddon1337 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Very serious candidate. However, such an insufficient number of spoken languages may be a problem. Abaddon1337 (talk) 16:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Runab (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Runab (talk) 18:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Cynko (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Cynko (talk) 19:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  143. 23artashes (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   23artashes (talk) 21:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Openbk (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Openbk (talk) 22:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Lanwi1 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Lanwi1(Talk) 11:15, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Andrzei111 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Andrzei111 (talk) 21:43, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Wulfstan (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Wulfstan (talk) 21:59, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Niesy74 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Niesy74 (talk) 05:47, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Zurbanski (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Zurbanski (talk) 11:23, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Torrosbak (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Good luck, Einsbor. We need you here. ;) Torrosbak (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  151. LoupDragon42 (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015   LoupDragon42 (talk) 10:44, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Sebleouf (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015   Sebleouf (talk) 12:12, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Andrzej19 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Andrzej19 (talk) 17:32, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  154. JoshuaKGarner (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   JoshuaKGarner (talk) 18:51, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   we need a Polish-speaking steward Ankry (talk) 19:41, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Good candidate, limited crosswiki activity is the only disadvantage but en-3 knwoldege should compensate. Alexmar983 (talk) 20:00, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Hadrianus (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Hadrianus (talk) 22:42, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Royalmate1 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Royalmate1 (talk) 00:49, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  159. EKMK (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2015   EKMK (talk) 11:13, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  160. LectriceDuSoir (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015   LectriceDuSoir (talk) 13:01, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Wiktoryn (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Wiktoryn (talk) 19:38, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Heyrubengarcia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Heyrubengarcia (talk) 01:53, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Pablo000 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015   No doubt. Pablo000 (talk) 06:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Cojan (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015   Cojan (talk) 07:16, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Don-kun (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Don-kun (talk) 11:44, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Thogo (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   თოგო (D) 14:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Mario58 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Mario58 (talk) 18:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Sturmjäger (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Sturmjäger (talk) 19:31, 16 February 2015 (UTC) 19:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Yopie (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Yopie (talk) 00:33, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Bpierreb (talk) 12:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Lt2818 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Lt2818 (talk) 14:05, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  172. MPK100 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   MPK100 (talk) 14:59, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Awersowy (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Awersowy (talk) 17:52, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  174. John Belushi (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   John Belushi (talk) 18:09, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Wikit 18:59, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Kossa b (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Kossa b (talk) 20:11, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Eman235 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Eman235/talk 20:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  178. Torin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Torin (talk) 20:21, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Vik-Thor (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   --Vik-Thor (talk) 21:26, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Kurykh (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Kurykh (talk) 01:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Andreas Werle (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Andreas Werle (talk) 08:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Param Mudgal (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Param Mudgal (talk) 12:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  183. Adamt (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Adamt (talk) 22:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Pavan santhosh.s (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Good cross wiki experience and prompt answers. Pavan santhosh.s (talk) 07:36, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  185. విశ్వనాధ్.బి.కె. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   విశ్వనాధ్.బి.కె. (talk) 07:38, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Xinstalker (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Xinstalker (talk) 16:53, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Chrumps (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Chrumps (talk) 17:23, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  188. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015   Chris Troutman (talk) 20:47, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  189. Coekon (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Coekon (talk) 22:18, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       CaZeRillo (Not eligible, checked by Eurodyne)   CaZeRillo (talk) 00:39, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Tracouti (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015   Tracouti (talk) 13:51, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  191. Tremonist (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015   Tremonist (talk) 14:36, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  192. Teddyyy (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Teddyyy 14:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Ronhjones (talk) 21:46, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  194. Alarob (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Alarob (talk) 21:46, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  195. Benoitlegrand (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Benoitlegrand (talk) 00:05, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  196. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015   Brateevsky (talk) 08:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Odannur (Not eligible, checked by Vituzzu)   Odannur (talk) 11:48, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Vaga-am (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)   Vaga-am (talk) 14:11, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  197. Andros64 (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015   Andros64 (talk) 15:09, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  198. Kusurija (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Kusurija (talk) 17:27, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Yves1953 (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2015   Yves1953 (talk) 21:19, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  200. Nobs01 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Nobs01 (talk) 23:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  201. Do not follow (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2015   Do not follow (talk) 09:16, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  202. Enfcer (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015   Enfcer (talk) 11:18, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  203. StudiesWorld (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   StudiesWorld (talk) 13:11, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Bk1 168 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Bk1 168 (talk) 14:07, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  205. Kubura (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Kubura (talk) 15:22, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  206. Wetrace (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Wetrace (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  207. EuroCarGT (Eligible, checked by Vik-Thor)2015   ///EuroCarGT 02:07, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  208. Julien1978 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Julien1978 (talk) 10:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  209. Hektor Absurdus (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Hektor Absurdus (talk) 12:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  210. FocalPoint (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   FocalPoint (talk) 12:09, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  211. Maleiva (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Maleiva (talk) 05:23, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  212. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   answered the questions well, has been knowledgeable in actions  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:37, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  213. Blackfish (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015   Blackfish (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  214. Sir Lothar (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015   Trustworthy and responsible person Sir Lothar (talk) 17:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  215. Mailer diablo (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015   Definitely. Mailer Diablo (talk) 18:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  216. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015   — X-Javier [m'écrire] 19:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  217. Jan Kovář BK (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Jan Kovář BK (talk) 23:55, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  218. MohandesWiki (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   MohandesWiki Talk 09:14, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  219. DrTrumpet (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   go DrTrumpet (talk) 22:39, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  220. Dinosaurioamarillo (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Yes, of course. Dinosaurioamarillo (talk) 02:45, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  221. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Ok -- Shanmugamp7 (talk) 06:38, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  222. Helvetius (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Helvetius (talk) 15:26, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  223. Bistropha (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Bistropha (talk) 08:19, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  224. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Timk70 question? 11:09, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  225. Icarus of old (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015   Icarus of old (talk) 17:54, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  226. GyaroMaguus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Seems to well prepared for the task at hand, especially as he knows what to do. GyaroMaguus 03:01, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  227. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   GZWDer (talk) 09:48, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  228. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Zeljko (talk) 10:39, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  229. MAyo (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   MAyo (talk) 14:02, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  No edit

  1. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   More crosswiki experience is necessary. Érico Wouters (msg) 18:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   More crosswiki experience is necessary. Steinsplitter (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   There must be more active in cross-wiki. --Uğurkenttalk 18:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   I think "I want to block Wikinger" is not a valid reason to become a steward. Additionally, I do not see any considerable cross-wiki experience (mostly plwiki, no other wiki with more than 1000 edits). I asked a question to find out about his understanding of certain problems at small wikis stewards often deal with, but IMHO the answer doesn't really exhibit an understanding of these realities. MF-W 18:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Cross-wiki experience is unfortunately lacking. Mh7kJ (talk) 19:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Per above. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Almost no contributions to any Wikiversity. --Marshallsumter (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Scooter (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Scooter (talk) 22:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Per concerns above (well, except specifically Wikiversity). SPQRobin (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Stemoc (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Lacks cross-wiki experience but a good candidate..would support next year.. Stemoc 02:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Too young on the different projects. Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Lack of crosswiki experience. See above and inequality score of 0.88 for contributed wikis. Nemo 08:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Per MF-W and Nemo for this time Herby talk thyme 11:02, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. JurgenNL (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   I have to agree with MF-Warburg. JurgenNL (talk) 16:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15. The Theosophist (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   The Theosophist (talk) 18:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Hinnerk11 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Hinnerk11 (talk) 01:27, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Hint000 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Hint000 (talk) 06:16, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   KTo288 (talk) 22:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Grest2000 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Grest2000 (talk) 14:28, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Bulldoc (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   More crosswiki experience is necessary Bulldoc (talk) 01:44, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Kehpp (Not eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)   Kehpp (talk) 11:40, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Not sure if we need another 'LTA' fighter. I think that there is a certain danger that even conjecturing things whilst admitting one's uncertainty can be interpreted as abuse. Furthermore, any good candidate ought to have constructive solutions to problems, instead of top-down solutions. Mathmensch (talk) 19:57, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   --Berlin-George (talk) 21:22, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Artregor (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Artregor (talk) 23:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 01:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Nnemo (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Nnemo (talk) 03:59, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Monopoly31121993 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   I'm also concerned about his desire to be judge, jury and executioner for User:Wikinger although I completely understand that such a situation would be frustrating beyond belief and should be address right away. Still I don't think it's a good reason by itself for becoming a steward. I do thank him though for his contributions to Wikis. Monopoly31121993 (talk) 09:21, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015   Per MF-W and Nemo MZaplotnik (contribs) 15:03, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Vachovec1 (talk) 18:44, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Base (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   The user focuses on OS/CU in Polish wiki and the only one of them he is active in is plwiki. I think user should consider getting a CU flag in there in addition to his OS flag (if rules allow it) and it'd suffice his needs quite well. I don't see a need for getting flag which gives almost ultimate rights in ~800 wikis in order to work in half a dozen of them. As to global CVN work GS and GRb would be a good start. Base (talk) 00:11, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Rcsprinter123 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Only ~3 years of experience. Rcsprinter123 (talk) 00:48, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  31. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Broader experience needed. John Vandenberg (talk) 11:02, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Beeswaxcandle (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Beeswaxcandle (talk) 22:42, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       SEWilco (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf)   SEWilco (talk) 00:46, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Glewe (Not eligible, checked by Caliburn)   Glewe (talk) 11:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Conlinp (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Conlinp (talk) 03:07, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Puffin (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Puffin (talk) 22:27, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Per MF-W and Nemo Zyephyrus (talk) 11:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Tiller54 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Tiller54 (talk) 16:35, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral edit

  1. Mö1997 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Mö1997 (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Alan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Alan (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Rich Farmbrough (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Rich Farmbrough 18:53 8 February 2015 (GMT). 18:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   While this user has extensive local experience with advanced rights and dispute resolution, I don't see a lot of cross-wiki activity as mentioned by others above me. Snowolf How can I help? 23:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. !dea4u (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   !dea4u  05:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. QEDK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   QEDK (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Gilc (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Gilc (talk) 04:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Ysjbserver (talk) 10:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Vonoserbizky Spartacus (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 11:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Hirolovesswords (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Hirolovesswords (talk) 16:18, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Congolandia.g (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Congolandia.g (talk) 21:10, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Yogesh Khandke (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Yogesh Khandke (talk) 05:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Talmid3 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Talmid3 (talk) 12:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Adriano Morelli (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Curiously enough, but never seen. Adriano Morelli (talk) 13:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Bybbisch94 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Bybbisch94 (talk) 07:35, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Matiia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Matiia (talk) 19:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. FDMS4 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Limited crosswiki experience, otherwise very positive.    FDMS  4    16:09, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. TCN7JM (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   More crosswiki experience would be nice, but I admire your work to plwiki, so I won't oppose. TCN7JM 23:57, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Steel1943 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   I like the answers to the questions, but as others have stated, lack of contributions on multiple Wikimedia sites is a concern of mine in regards to an editor who holds the "steward" title, but it's not enough for me to say no. Steel1943 (talk) 19:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Poti Berik (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Poti Berik (talk) 09:12, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015   Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 17:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Miniwark (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Not sure than fighting one spammer is a sufficient reason to become a stewart. Miniwark (talk) 19:04, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015   FeralOink (talk) 07:13, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Avraham (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Avi (talk) 14:40, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Krol111 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Krol111 (talk) 15:59, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Good afternoon (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015   Quite positive though. Good afternoon (talk) 13:12, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]