Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2015/Votes/Einsbor

< Stewards | Elections 2015

Einsbor

edit
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: pl, en-3, fr-2
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello!

    I'm Einsbor from Warsaw, Poland. I had begun contributing to Wikimedia projects in 2012, became more active in 2013. My contributions are focused in general on recent changes patrolling, fighting vandalism and long-term abuse, mostly on plwiki, but I also help in global countervandalism work. I am an admin, oversighter, member of local ArbCom at plwiki and OTRS member. Because I still feel that with my skills and knowledge I can do more for Wikimedia projects, I decided to apply for stewardship.

    Due to the fact that I have relatively little cross-wiki vandalism and spam fighting experience, if elected, I want to help mostly with oversight, checkuser, permissions requests and LTA fighting. On plwiki we have a problem with an LTA user - Wikinger. Due to his abusive activity (including libelous contribs) a few Polish providers had been banned globally (a few times) by a former Polish steward, a lot of open proxies have been banned. Now I give work for stewards - if elected, I will be able to do it by myself.

    I live, as I wrote before, in Warsaw (CET), but due to the character of my occupation, I'm active at various times - night, early morning, evenings - depends on the shift. While online, I'm reachable at #wikimedia-stewards, #cvn-wp-pl, #cvn-sw, #wikipedia-pl channels. I speak Polish as my native language, English at a decent level and basic French. I have read, understand and fully accept steward, oversight, checkuser and privacy policy.

    In nonwiki reality, I am an automation engineer.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2015/Questions#Einsbor
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

  Yes

edit
  1. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Of course. Very helpful and trustworthy user. Żyrafał (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Answers are fine. Vogone (talk) 18:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. George.Edward.C (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Good candidate whom I've conversed with in the past. Seems trustworthy, and experienced in the areas of cross-wiki anti-vandalism and anti-spam. George.Edward.C (talk) 18:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Sebada11 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Good candidate. Sebada11 (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Emptywords (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  No doubts. Emptywords (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. KillFighter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  All fine ;) ~KillFighter Speak? 18:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Ptjackyll (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Ptjackyll (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Michał Sobkowski (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Michał Sobkowski (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Wpedzich (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  An avid Wikinger-hunter, whom we actually do need in the current situation. Apart from this obvious need for a fast-reacting steward, a user with a steep learning curve whom I've personally seen to adminship and beyond. Can be seen online at hours where we, central Europeans sleep soundly, which is yet another advantage. And a cool person to be around with, to boot. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 18:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Trusted Eurodyne (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Boston9 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Great candidate on -> all fronts! Boston9 (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Teukros (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Teukros (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Stanko (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Stanko (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Stefaniak (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Stefaniak (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC) Polish mob in full swing :) utter trust in your capabilities, just hope you won't get jaded before your time.[reply]
  15. Nedops (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Nedops (talk) 18:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Emin • message 18:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Hardenacke (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Hardenacke (talk) 18:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Great candidate :) –Davey2010Talk 18:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Roxyuru (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Good candidate. --Roxyuru 18:48, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Aldnonymous (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Edit conflict 3 times! Would you believe that? Many people supporting you Einsbor!--AldNonBicara? 18:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. NahidSultan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  ~ Nahid Talk 18:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Jeremy77186 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jeremy77186 (talk) 18:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Ejensyd (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Ejensyd (talk) 19:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Asav (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Simply a good steward. Asav (talk) 19:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Levi bernardo (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  --Levi bernardo (talk) 19:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Semso98 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Semso98 (talk) 19:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Green Giant (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Decent answers to questions. Cross-wiki experience is a must but there is no minimum limit before someone is eligible for stewardship. Green Giant (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  28. The boss (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  The boss (talk) 19:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Fenikals (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Fenikals (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Yurek88 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Yurek88 (talk) 19:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Saileshpat (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  Saileshpat (talk) 19:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Jacek555 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Jacek555 (talk) 19:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Elfhelm (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Elfhelm (talk) 19:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Wieralee (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Wieralee (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Fork me (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Fork me (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  33. The Polish (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  The Polish (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Piotr967 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Piotr967 (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rzuwig► 20:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Obelix (talk) 20:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Mirer (talk) 20:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Rome2 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rome2 (talk) 20:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Polimerek (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Polimerek (talk) 20:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Yodaspirine (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Yodaspirine (talk) 20:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Chicbyaccident (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Chicbyaccident (talk) 20:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Pnapora (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Pnapora (talk) 21:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  43. D kuba (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  D kuba (talk) 21:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  44. PawełMM (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  PawełMM (talk) 21:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Devwebtel (Not eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt) •  Devwebtel (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Armbrust (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  46. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  PiRSquared17 (talk) 22:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Pit rock (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Hope you'll be at the helm. Pit rock (talk) 22:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  48. NickK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Although cross-wiki activity is not extraordinary, answers are good, and I think a candidate will be a good steward — NickK (talk) 22:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Mazuritz (talk) 22:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Barras (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Looks like a good candidate to me! -Barras talk 22:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Rax (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  experienced, able to answer substantially, no counter ad - ok Rax (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 22:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  53. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  DangSunM (talk) 22:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Courcelles 23:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Moony22 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Very comprehensive answers. Candidate seems well qualified and understands the requirements for stewardship. Hardly any doubts. Moony22 (talk) 23:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Chess (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Great candidate, but if you are elected, please do more cross-wiki work. You have enough, but you should allay the fears of others by doing some more crosswiki work. Chess (talk) 23:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Daemon2010 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Daemon2010 (talk) 23:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  This person is really only active on Polish Wikipedia. They have a few hundred edits at Simple English and Wikidata, and about 150 on Commons. I have reservations about this person being ready for any problem but they meet my minimal expectations, and I see no evidence that they have a history of doing anything troublesome. Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Arth M (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  No doubts! Arth M (talk) 00:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Woodshed (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Woodshed (talk) 01:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Augurmm (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Augurmm (talk) 02:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jusjih (talk) 03:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Albertus Aditya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Albertus Aditya (talk) 03:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Inks.LWC (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Inks.LWC (talk) 05:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Xoristzatziki (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Xoristzatziki (talk) 05:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Lacks some cross-wiki experience but overall a good candidate. Ajraddatz (talk) 05:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  68. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  70. MatiOmlet (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  responsible candidate, known from Polish Wikipedia, which needs help to get better MatiOmlet (talk) 08:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Doctore (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Doctore (talk) 08:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Quodvultdeus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Right man for right job, his availability is a great advantage Quodvultdeus (talk) 10:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  73. MOs810 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  MOs810 (talk) 10:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Kggucwa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Kggucwa (talk) 10:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  75. PMG (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  PMG (talk) 10:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Rberchie (talk) 11:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Ethically Yours (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Ethically Yours (talk) 11:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Alexey88 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Alexey88 (talk) 12:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Stigfinnare (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Stigfinnare (talk) 12:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Maestro Ivanković (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Maestro Ivanković (talk) 12:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Qualified user who eagerly wants to help. Will surely be a good steward imo. Trijnsteltalk 12:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  82. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  NaBUru38 (talk) 13:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Nastoshka (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Very good candidate imo Nastoshka (talk) 13:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Austral blizzard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Austral blizzard (talk) 14:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Tufor (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  helpful, experienced, trustworthy, very active user. Very good answers to my questions. He will be great steward hands down. Tufor (talk) 14:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  86. AmaryllisGardener (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  AmaryllisGardener talk 14:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Kroji (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Kroji (talk) 15:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  88. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Will hopefully swift his focus on other steward tasks too which we can see once he's elected. —DerHexer (Talk) 15:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Suriyaa Kudo (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Suriyaa Kudo (talk) 16:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  90. TomášPolonec (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  TomášPolonec (talk) 17:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Nawider (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Nawider (talk) 18:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Magalia (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Magalia (talk) 18:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  AGF. Southparkfan 18:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Miniapolis (talk) 18:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Hannes_24 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  --Hannes 24 (talk) 18:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Nezdek (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Nezdek (talk) 18:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Mpn (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  very inteligent person Mpn (talk) 19:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Xania (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I'm satisfied with this user's description and responses to the questions he was asked. Xania (talk) 20:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Kilith (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Kilith (talk) 20:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Ray Van De Walker (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Ray Van De Walker (talk) 20:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Litlok (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Litlok (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Demonstrates good knowledge of the policies for the function and interest in learning what you don't know with the more experienced Stewards. Good luck! Leon saudanha (talk) 22:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Серега Спартак (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Серега Спартак (talk) 23:38, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Kalinowski (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Kalinowski (talk) 00:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Be..anyone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  A spam fighter with some clues, have fun. –Be..anyone (talk) 01:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Shizhao (talk) 02:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  107. PP2014 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  PP2014 (talk) 03:39, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  FASTILY 05:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Kelvin (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Kelvin (talk) 07:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Bookvaedina (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Bookvaedina (talk) 09:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Holder (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Holder (talk) 11:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Green Zero (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  — Green Zero обг 12:37, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  113. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  No major concerns. CT Cooper · talk 14:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Bladyniec (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Tomasz Bladyniec (talk) 14:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Kantatiskiwa (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Du sang neuf, contre partie d'une expérience limitée Kantatiskiwa (talk) 14:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  116. IJA (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  IJA (talk) 15:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Maire (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  A trustworthy and hardworking user :). Maire ♣ 20:39, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Andre S. (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Andre S. (talk) 21:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Masti (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  masti <dyskusja> 22:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Steschke (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Fingerspitzengefühl bei der Arbeit wird er ja wohl haben. ST ○ 22:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Alan ffm (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Alan ffm (talk) 23:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Ffkapa (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Ffkapa (talk) 23:25, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Pawel Niemczuk (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Pawel Niemczuk (talk) 23:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Theredmonkey (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  trm 23:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Elcobbola (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Эlcobbola talk 00:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Tiptoety (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Tiptoety talk 00:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Marcus Cyron (talk) 04:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  128. GeoO (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  geo ») 06:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Az1568 (talk) 06:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  This person has been in good standing and answered the questions politely and thoughtfully. Wpollard (talk) 07:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Matanya (talk) 07:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Torne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Torne (talk) 10:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Padawane (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  P@d@w@ne 10:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Y 6 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Y 6 (talk) 10:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Widr (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Widr (talk) 10:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Ghilt (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Ghilt (talk) 12:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Jon Harald Søby (talk) 12:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Gonzolito (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Experienced and voluntary, good answers. Gonzolito (talk) 13:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  139. K6ka (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  A bit more cross-wiki activity would be desirable, but other than that, you are capable of being a steward. Good luck! --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 13:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Abaddon1337 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Very serious candidate. However, such an insufficient number of spoken languages may be a problem. Abaddon1337 (talk) 16:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Runab (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Runab (talk) 18:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Cynko (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Cynko (talk) 19:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  143. 23artashes (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  23artashes (talk) 21:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Openbk (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Openbk (talk) 22:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Lanwi1 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Lanwi1(Talk) 11:15, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Andrzei111 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Andrzei111 (talk) 21:43, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Wulfstan (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Wulfstan (talk) 21:59, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Niesy74 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Niesy74 (talk) 05:47, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Zurbanski (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Zurbanski (talk) 11:23, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Torrosbak (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Good luck, Einsbor. We need you here. ;) Torrosbak (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  151. LoupDragon42 (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015 •  LoupDragon42 (talk) 10:44, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Sebleouf (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015 •  Sebleouf (talk) 12:12, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Andrzej19 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Andrzej19 (talk) 17:32, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  154. JoshuaKGarner (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  JoshuaKGarner (talk) 18:51, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  we need a Polish-speaking steward Ankry (talk) 19:41, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Good candidate, limited crosswiki activity is the only disadvantage but en-3 knwoldege should compensate. Alexmar983 (talk) 20:00, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Hadrianus (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Hadrianus (talk) 22:42, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Royalmate1 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Royalmate1 (talk) 00:49, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  159. EKMK (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2015 •  EKMK (talk) 11:13, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  160. LectriceDuSoir (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  LectriceDuSoir (talk) 13:01, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Wiktoryn (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Wiktoryn (talk) 19:38, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Heyrubengarcia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Heyrubengarcia (talk) 01:53, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Pablo000 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  No doubt. Pablo000 (talk) 06:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Cojan (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Cojan (talk) 07:16, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Don-kun (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Don-kun (talk) 11:44, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Thogo (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  თოგო (D) 14:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Mario58 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Mario58 (talk) 18:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Sturmjäger (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Sturmjäger (talk) 19:31, 16 February 2015 (UTC) 19:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Yopie (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Yopie (talk) 00:33, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Bpierreb (talk) 12:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Lt2818 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Lt2818 (talk) 14:05, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  172. MPK100 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  MPK100 (talk) 14:59, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Awersowy (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Awersowy (talk) 17:52, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  174. John Belushi (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  John Belushi (talk) 18:09, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Wikit 18:59, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Kossa b (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Kossa b (talk) 20:11, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Eman235 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Eman235/talk 20:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  178. Torin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Torin (talk) 20:21, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Vik-Thor (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  --Vik-Thor (talk) 21:26, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Kurykh (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Kurykh (talk) 01:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Andreas Werle (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Andreas Werle (talk) 08:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Param Mudgal (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Param Mudgal (talk) 12:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  183. Adamt (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Adamt (talk) 22:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Pavan santhosh.s (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Good cross wiki experience and prompt answers. Pavan santhosh.s (talk) 07:36, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  185. విశ్వనాధ్.బి.కె. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  విశ్వనాధ్.బి.కె. (talk) 07:38, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Xinstalker (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Xinstalker (talk) 16:53, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Chrumps (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Chrumps (talk) 17:23, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  188. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Chris Troutman (talk) 20:47, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  189. Coekon (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Coekon (talk) 22:18, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       CaZeRillo (Not eligible, checked by Eurodyne) •  CaZeRillo (talk) 00:39, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Tracouti (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Tracouti (talk) 13:51, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  191. Tremonist (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Tremonist (talk) 14:36, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  192. Teddyyy (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Teddyyy 14:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Ronhjones (talk) 21:46, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  194. Alarob (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Alarob (talk) 21:46, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  195. Benoitlegrand (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Benoitlegrand (talk) 00:05, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  196. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015 •  Brateevsky (talk) 08:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Odannur (Not eligible, checked by Vituzzu) •  Odannur (talk) 11:48, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Vaga-am (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Vaga-am (talk) 14:11, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  197. Andros64 (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Andros64 (talk) 15:09, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  198. Kusurija (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Kusurija (talk) 17:27, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Yves1953 (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2015 •  Yves1953 (talk) 21:19, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  200. Nobs01 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Nobs01 (talk) 23:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  201. Do not follow (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2015 •  Do not follow (talk) 09:16, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  202. Enfcer (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015 •  Enfcer (talk) 11:18, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  203. StudiesWorld (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  StudiesWorld (talk) 13:11, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Bk1 168 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Bk1 168 (talk) 14:07, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  205. Kubura (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Kubura (talk) 15:22, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  206. Wetrace (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Wetrace (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  207. EuroCarGT (Eligible, checked by Vik-Thor)2015 •  ///EuroCarGT 02:07, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  208. Julien1978 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Julien1978 (talk) 10:02, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  209. Hektor Absurdus (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Hektor Absurdus (talk) 12:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  210. FocalPoint (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  FocalPoint (talk) 12:09, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  211. Maleiva (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Maleiva (talk) 05:23, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  212. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  answered the questions well, has been knowledgeable in actions  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:37, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  213. Blackfish (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Blackfish (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  214. Sir Lothar (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Trustworthy and responsible person Sir Lothar (talk) 17:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  215. Mailer diablo (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Definitely. Mailer Diablo (talk) 18:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  216. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  — X-Javier ✉ [m'écrire] 19:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  217. Jan Kovář BK (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Jan Kovář BK (talk) 23:55, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  218. MohandesWiki (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  MohandesWiki Talk 09:14, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  219. DrTrumpet (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  go DrTrumpet (talk) 22:39, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  220. Dinosaurioamarillo (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Yes, of course. Dinosaurioamarillo (talk) 02:45, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  221. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Ok -- Shanmugamp7 (talk) 06:38, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  222. Helvetius (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Helvetius (talk) 15:26, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  223. Bistropha (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Bistropha (talk) 08:19, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  224. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Timk70 question? 11:09, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  225. Icarus of old (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Icarus of old (talk) 17:54, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  226. GyaroMaguus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Seems to well prepared for the task at hand, especially as he knows what to do. —Gyaro–Maguus— 03:01, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  227. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  GZWDer (talk) 09:48, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  228. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Zeljko (talk) 10:39, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  229. MAyo (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  MAyo (talk) 14:02, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  2. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  More crosswiki experience is necessary. Érico Wouters (msg) 18:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  More crosswiki experience is necessary. Steinsplitter (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  There must be more active in cross-wiki. --Uğurkenttalk 18:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I think "I want to block Wikinger" is not a valid reason to become a steward. Additionally, I do not see any considerable cross-wiki experience (mostly plwiki, no other wiki with more than 1000 edits). I asked a question to find out about his understanding of certain problems at small wikis stewards often deal with, but IMHO the answer doesn't really exhibit an understanding of these realities. MF-W 18:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Cross-wiki experience is unfortunately lacking. Mh7kJ (talk) 19:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Per above. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Almost no contributions to any Wikiversity. --Marshallsumter (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Scooter (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Scooter (talk) 22:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Per concerns above (well, except specifically Wikiversity). SPQRobin (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Stemoc (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Lacks cross-wiki experience but a good candidate..would support next year.. Stemoc 02:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Too young on the different projects. Laurent Jerry (talk) 07:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Lack of crosswiki experience. See above and inequality score of 0.88 for contributed wikis. Nemo 08:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Per MF-W and Nemo for this time Herby talk thyme 11:02, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15. JurgenNL (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  I have to agree with MF-Warburg. JurgenNL (talk) 16:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. The Theosophist (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  The Theosophist (talk) 18:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Hinnerk11 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Hinnerk11 (talk) 01:27, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Hint000 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Hint000 (talk) 06:16, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  KTo288 (talk) 22:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Grest2000 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Grest2000 (talk) 14:28, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Bulldoc (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  More crosswiki experience is necessary Bulldoc (talk) 01:44, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Kehpp (Not eligible, checked by George.Edward.C) •  Kehpp (talk) 11:40, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Not sure if we need another 'LTA' fighter. I think that there is a certain danger that even conjecturing things whilst admitting one's uncertainty can be interpreted as abuse. Furthermore, any good candidate ought to have constructive solutions to problems, instead of top-down solutions. Mathmensch (talk) 19:57, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  --Berlin-George (talk) 21:22, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Artregor (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Artregor (talk) 23:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 01:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Nnemo (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Nnemo (talk) 03:59, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Monopoly31121993 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  I'm also concerned about his desire to be judge, jury and executioner for User:Wikinger although I completely understand that such a situation would be frustrating beyond belief and should be address right away. Still I don't think it's a good reason by itself for becoming a steward. I do thank him though for his contributions to Wikis. Monopoly31121993 (talk) 09:21, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  28. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  Per MF-W and Nemo MZaplotnik (contribs) 15:03, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Vachovec1 (talk) 18:44, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Base (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  The user focuses on OS/CU in Polish wiki and the only one of them he is active in is plwiki. I think user should consider getting a CU flag in there in addition to his OS flag (if rules allow it) and it'd suffice his needs quite well. I don't see a need for getting flag which gives almost ultimate rights in ~800 wikis in order to work in half a dozen of them. As to global CVN work GS and GRb would be a good start. Base (talk) 00:11, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Rcsprinter123 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Only ~3 years of experience. Rcsprinter123 (talk) 00:48, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  32. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Broader experience needed. John Vandenberg (talk) 11:02, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Beeswaxcandle (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Beeswaxcandle (talk) 22:42, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       SEWilco (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  SEWilco (talk) 00:46, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Glewe (Not eligible, checked by Caliburn) •  Glewe (talk) 11:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Conlinp (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Conlinp (talk) 03:07, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Puffin (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Puffin (talk) 22:27, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Per MF-W and Nemo Zyephyrus (talk) 11:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Tiller54 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Tiller54 (talk) 16:35, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  2. Mö1997 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Mö1997 (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Alan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Alan (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Rich Farmbrough (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rich Farmbrough 18:53 8 February 2015 (GMT). 18:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  While this user has extensive local experience with advanced rights and dispute resolution, I don't see a lot of cross-wiki activity as mentioned by others above me. Snowolf How can I help? 23:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. !dea4u (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  !dea4u  05:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. QEDK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  QEDK (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Gilc (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Gilc (talk) 04:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Ysjbserver (talk) 10:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Vonoserbizky Spartacus (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 11:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Hirolovesswords (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Hirolovesswords (talk) 16:18, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Congolandia.g (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Congolandia.g (talk) 21:10, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Yogesh Khandke (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Yogesh Khandke (talk) 05:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Talmid3 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Talmid3 (talk) 12:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Adriano Morelli (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Curiously enough, but never seen. Adriano Morelli (talk) 13:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Bybbisch94 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Bybbisch94 (talk) 07:35, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Matiia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Matiia (talk) 19:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. FDMS4 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Limited crosswiki experience, otherwise very positive.    FDMS  4    16:09, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. TCN7JM (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  More crosswiki experience would be nice, but I admire your work to plwiki, so I won't oppose. TCN7JM 23:57, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Steel1943 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  I like the answers to the questions, but as others have stated, lack of contributions on multiple Wikimedia sites is a concern of mine in regards to an editor who holds the "steward" title, but it's not enough for me to say no. Steel1943 (talk) 19:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Poti Berik (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Poti Berik (talk) 09:12, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 17:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Miniwark (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Not sure than fighting one spammer is a sufficient reason to become a stewart. Miniwark (talk) 19:04, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  FeralOink (talk) 07:13, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Avraham (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Avi (talk) 14:40, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Krol111 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Krol111 (talk) 15:59, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Good afternoon (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015 •  Quite positive though. Good afternoon (talk) 13:12, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2015/Votes/Einsbor&oldid=26366920"