Código universal de Conducta/Comité de redacción

This page is a translated version of the page Universal Code of Conduct/Drafting committee and the translation is 13% complete.
Outdated translations are marked like this.
Código Universal de Conducta

Phase 2

The Universal Code of Conduct Drafting committee for phase 2 (UCoCDC 2 or “the committee”) is a group of Wikimedians brought together with the purpose of writing the draft for enforcement guidelines for the Universal Code of Conduct for Board ratification as requested in the Board statement on community culture 2020. The committee will consist of volunteer movement members brought in through an open application process, affiliate staff volunteering for it and qualified Foundation staff based on specific skills (including legal experience, diversity & inclusion experience, and translatability expertise). Members will be selected by the Vice President of Community Resilience and Sustainability of the Wikimedia Foundation. Volunteer members for the committee will be respected community members with at least two of the following skills or traits:

  • experience in policy drafting
  • experience with the application of existing rules and policies on Wikimedia projects
  • experience in cooperating online
  • empathy
  • experience in collaborating in an international team
  • participatory decision making

They will be selected as much as possible to also represent the diversity of our movement in respect to languages spoken, geography, gender, age, project size of their home wiki, and their roles within the Wikimedia movement. Building on the detailed recommendations made by the movement strategy working group on community health, the Committee will look at the emerging feedback from Wikimedia communities, affiliate groups and functionaries about their needs and desires for application and enforcement of conduct policy. Work will be conducted through a facilitated structure to avoid impasses and maintain focus. One or more people will be selected for their writing skills to do the actual drafting based on input from the group. A dedicated facilitator will provide this structure, lead the facilitation, and provide additional resources as needed.

Phase 2 call for applications

Phase 2 drafting committee members

We are pleased to announce that the Universal Code of Conduct drafting committee for phase 2 has been assembled. We had 35 volunteers apply, either by publicly signing up on the Meta page, or by sending an email. Volunteers from at least 20 different countries applied, identifying themselves as working on 26 different wikimedia projects. There was a wide range of roles applicants held within the movement as well as a wide range of experiences on wiki and skills in policy making outside the movement. It was once again very hard to narrow down from this diverse and extremely qualified pool of applicants.

We feel lucky that we could choose from such a broad and exciting candidate pool and form a committee we think will collaborate with one another effectively and create the best possible enforcement guidelines for the Universal Code of Conduct for the Wikimedia movement.

The new committee is a group of people that includes Wikimedians from 9 different countries and who edit our projects in more than 11 different languages. Collectively they hold sysop roles on 13 different projects and 11 higher functionary roles, including two global sysops and 2 sitting arbitrators on different projects. Unfortunately no steward or former steward applied as a volunteer, but we were able to use one of the Foundation staff slots to appoint a member who was a steward until recently. Several members of the committee have been editing since 2008, we have a member who helped organize Wikimania 2007, and we also have someone who joined the Wikimedia movement only in 2021. Collectively the committee members have edited our projects more than 395,000 times with their volunteer accounts. The committee also includes founding and board members of affiliates of different sizes, a sitting AffCom member and several members of the OTRS-Team.

We are extremely grateful to everyone who volunteered and certainly to those who have accepted the responsibility of producing this first document. It will be the inspiring starting point from which enforcement processes and strategies will evolve over time. We know there will be many hard conversations within the committee and beyond, and we hope that everyone with an interest will participate as we work together to try to create fair systems for all.

Phase 2 volunteers

Phase 2 staff members

Phase 2 drafting committee timeline

Phase 2 drafting committee timeline
Details Dates Synopsis Time commitment
Onboarding call (optional) 29 April Welcome, overview of reading materials, review guidelines, expectations, timeline, Friendly Space Policy, committee tools and platforms, remote etiquette, Q&A. 1 hour.
Onboarding library + required reading 26 April – 10 May Go through the library for required reading before the first drafting session. 5 to 8 hours.
Drafting sessions 14 May – 9 July Drafting sessions will be held weekly. There will also be asynchronous work. 2-hour weekly drafting sessions. Up to 4-hour weekly asynchronous work.
Translation of the draft 10 July – 20 July Break for the drafting committee. No time required.
Public review period 20 July – 20 September

Committee break with options for 1-2 hours of weekly participation in community discussions.

Final decisions will be made when the committee reconvenes.

No time required.

Optional participation with weekly digest - committee members who do not follow discussions as they are happening will be expected to read the digests before the committee reconvenes.

Drafting Committee Proposal Refining 1 October – 30 November Committee will reconvene to work through and implement community feedback. 2-hour weekly refining sessions. Up to 2-hour weekly asynchronous work.

The ideal drafting committee paradox - a short essay

Essay by CSteigenberger (WMF)

In an ideal world, the drafting committee would represent the full diversity of our movement and all members would have important insights into how policies are applied successfully on different Wikimedia projects, but also elsewhere in the world. It would have members who have held extended rights for a long time, sat on ArbComs and other committees, as well as newcomers to our projects. Some of its members would be Wikimedians who have been targeted by harassers, others would be people who have resolved incidents around harassment successfully. There would also be Wikimedians who have falsely been accused of harassment. On the committee we would see Wikimedians from different projects from all around the world. Young Wikimedians, old Wikimedians, women, men, non-binary Wikimedians, Wikimedians with different skin tones, different religious backgrounds, working in different topic areas and more.

All those people would interact with each other respectfully and in harmony, making room for the viewpoints of others but also bringing forward their own insights and ideas. They would be flexible in their scheduling and accommodating the needs of other committee members. They would be solution focused and effective in creating a text in English that is easily translatable. They would enjoy creating guidelines for enforcement, taking into account existing community processes and making sure they are in compliance with legal requirements the Wikimedia Foundation has to fulfill.

At the same time this ideal committee would be made up of ordinary, real people, just like you. People who might have work obligations, families, social lives and a wide variety of interests outside the Wikimedia movement and who also need time to sleep, to rest and to do lots of things not connected to the UCoC. People with a limited understanding of the complexity of the task and people with limited energy. People who make mistakes, create misunderstandings, might be moody or even difficult at times and might get sick or experience other unexpected problems.

It will take people with traits on both sides of this paradox to create the best possible drafting committee. We want to encourage you to think about what parts of this ideal committee describe you best and to let us know about them!

Phase 1

Phase 1 Drafting committee recruiting and meeting notes

El Comité de Redacción del Código Universal de Conducta (UCoCDC o "el comité") es un grupo de wikimedistas reunidos con el propósito de finalizar el borrador del Código de Conducta Universal antes del 30 de agosto de 2020, para la ratificación de la Junta según lo solicitado en la Declaración de la Junta Directiva sobre cultura comunitaria 2020. El comité estará compuesto por miembros del movimiento voluntario traídos a través de un proceso de solicitud abierto y personal calificado de la Fundación basado en habilidades específicas (incluyendo experiencia legal, experiencia de diversidad e inclusión, y experiencia en traducibilidad). Los miembros serán seleccionados por el Vice Presidente de Resiliencia Comunitaria y Sostenibilidad de la Fundación Wikimedia. Los miembros voluntarios del comité serán miembros respetados de la comunidad con al menos dos de las siguientes habilidades o rasgos:

Experiencia en redacción de políticas
Experiencia en cooperar on-line
Empatía
Experiencia en colaborar en un equipo internacional
Participación en toma de decisiones colectivas

Serán seleccionados tanto como sea posible para representar también la diversidad de nuestro movimiento con respecto a idiomas hablados, geografía, género, edad, tamaño del proyecto de su wiki de origen y sus roles dentro del movimiento Wikimedia. Partiendo de las recomendaciones detalladas realizadas por el grupo de trabajo de estrategia de movimiento sobre salud comunitaria, el Comité utilizará el Pacto del colaborador como línea base e incorporará los comentarios recopilados según corresponda. El trabajo se llevará a cabo a través de una estructura facilitada para evitar impasses y mantener el enfoque. Una o dos personas serán seleccionadas por sus habilidades de escritura para hacer el borrador real basado en los aportes del grupo. Un equipo dedicado de la Fundación, Desarrollo Comunitario, proporcionará esta estructura, liderará la facilitación y proporcionará recursos adicionales según sea necesario.

Convocatoria para postular

Universal Code of Conduct/Drafting committee/es

¿Te preocupas por la seguridad y amabilidad en el movimiento Wikimedia? ¿Estás interesado en las directrices y políticas que lo guían? ¿Disfrutas de ayudar a realizar mejoras en estas áreas? ¡Esta es tu posibilidad de implicarte!

Estamos buscando voluntarios para unirse al Comité de Redacción del Código Universal de Conducta. Si estás interesado, por favor lee la siguiente información importante para los candidatos:

¿Quién estará en el comité? - Cinco o seis voluntarios y cuatro o cinco miembros del personal de la Fundación y (dependiendo de cuántos candidatos apliquen) ¿Cuándo estará activo el comité? - Julio 15 - agosto 30 de 2020 ¿Qué harán? Leer el material de base y redactar un Código Universal de Conducta que proporcionará una guia con lineamientos mínimos para el comportamiento de cada colaborador del movimiento Wikimeida. Puedes consultar más información aquí. ¿Cómo trabajan? Se reunirán en línea y trabajarán sobre los documentos compartidos, partiendo del Pacto del Colaborador como texto inicial. Un equipo de facilitación les ayudará a organizar el trabajo, y habrá expertos en áreas diferentes disponibles para proporcionar apoyo. ¿Cuánto tiempo debo planificar en invertir por semana? Habrá reuniones on-line (2-4 horas por semana), así como lectura de fondo en las fases tempranas que resultan en hasta 8-10 horas cada semana. ¿Qué habilidades tengo que tener para al proceso? Idealmente deberías tener experiencia en la redacción de políticas, experiencia en cooperar on-line y en escribir en inglés. También nos encantarían que nuestros candidatos tuviesen empatía. ¿Cómo serán seleccionados los miembros del comité? El Equipo de Seguridad y Confianza junto con el Equipo Legal de la Fundación Wikimedia revisará todos los candidatos. Entonces, el Vicepresidente de Resiliencia y Sostenibilidad Comunitaria, Maggie Dennis, escogerá los miembros del comité basados en el nivel de habilidades y experiencia de los candidatos en combinación con factores de diversidad. Idealmente seremos capaces de formar un comité competente que refleje la diversidad del movimiento no solo en las áreas demográficas habituales como lengua, ubicación geográfica, género, edad, sino también en áreas wiki concretas como el tamaño de su wiki de origen, funciones en el movimiento Wikimedia, tipo de proyecto y más.

Si estás interesado en postular, por favor háznoslo saber antes del 15 de julio firmando abajo o por correo a Christel Steigenberger. Por favor incluye tu nombre de usuario y el enlace a la página de usuario de tu wiki de origen y proporciona los enlaces que demuestran tu experiencia. Cuéntanos sobre las funciones que desarrollas o desarrollaste en Wikimedia u organizaciones similares. Siéntete libre de añadir cualquier información extra que nos ayude a tomar una decisión informada.

Por favor envía este mensaje a cualquier voluntario que pienses que podría estar interesado, y anímalo a postular y ayudarnos a correr la voz. También es bienvenida la ayuda para traducir este mensaje aquí.

Postulaciones para el comité de redacción

Universal Code of Conduct/Drafting committee/es

Por favor firma aquí arriba. Las postulaciones también pueden ser enviadas por correo aquí. Enviar un correo también es la forma de proporcionar información adicional que no quieres hacer pública en la wiki (p. ej. pruebas de trabajo para otras organizaciones que comprometan tu anonimato en los proyectos Wikimedia).

  • I'm interested to be part of the drafting committee and volunteer in work with the Wikimedia movement.Bello Na'im (talk)
  • I volunteered to serve on this committee--have been engaged in these discussions for quite some time on a global scale. RachelWex (talk) 02:09, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[]
  • I am interested in working for the committee. --Csisc (talk) 18:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[]
  • I would like to apply to work with the drafting committee Nattes à chat (talk) 00:08, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[]
  • I would like to apply to participate in the drafting committee. Chico Venancio (talk) 13:57, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[]
  • I'd like to help out with the committee. -- Llywrch (talk) 21:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[]
  • I'm interested in drafting; I have experience in the enwiki's projectspace and I hope that it will serve me well here. John M Wolfson (talk) 03:53, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[]
  • I'm interested to work for the committee, more details about myself has been forwarded to Christel Steigenberger via email. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 07:16, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[]
  • I am interested in working for the committee, I've explained details about my experience to Mervat. -- Ravan (talk) 11:38, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[]
  • I will be pleased to work in this committee; I will forward the required details through email to the appropriate personnel.--Uzoma 17:44, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[]
  • I will be delighted to participate in the draft committee as:
    1. I am the oldest User at Hindi Wikipedia.
    2. I represent Indic community.
    3. I have been Bureaucrat & Admin for a pretty long period.
    4. I have a good understanding for *Code of Conduct* as I have been actively participating in framing of rules and policies for period Long.
    5. I have been actively participating in the Community discussions for long long period.
    6. Done enormous and quality contributions, featured articles, that still features on the Hindi Wiki main page, and also enormous number of pages.
--Ashish BhatnagarPlume pen w.giftalk 11:09, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[]
  • I would like to apply, I've sent more details about myself to Christel Steigenberger via email. --Civvì (talk) 14:01, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[]
  • Interested, email sent. — Racconish💬 08:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[]
  • I wrote the draft for the Living People policy and the RfC that lead to it's adoption on Wikidata. Since May 2017 I'm an admin on Wikidata I have had experience with a lot of on-Wiki moderation. Outside of Wikimedia I spent four years in the moderation team for the StevePavlina forum which was a self-improvement forum. In that time we had a lot of discussions about our forum rules in our moderation team. I was a member of Citizendium Editorial Council.
Offline I did community organizing as well by being one of the people who started the Quantified Self community in Germany. ChristianKl❫ 13:46, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[]
  • I will be pleased to work on the Commitee. masti <talk> 20:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[]
  • I'd be interested in being part of the drafting committee. Kirill Lokshin (talk) 04:34, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[]
  • I'm interested to be part of in the drafting committee and I sent an email with my user's detail and volunteering work on the Wikimedia movement. --Camelia (talk) 07:38, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[]
  • I'm interested to serve the drafting committee. Sami Mlouhi (talk) 14:02, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[]
  • I'm interested in join this committee. My previous experience in addition to my permanent advocacy on have better online and offline spaces in my communities, includes the deployment of the first regional Code of Conduct in a chapter in Latin America in 2013, feedback and translation to Spanish of first WMF's Friendly Space Policy and their effective deployment in Mexico. In addition I have professional experience in advocacy and research in the intersection of Human Rights and technologies. Thanks, --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 16:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[]
  1. I am interested in joining this committee. I have submitted additional information by email to summarise both some relevant on-wiki experience and some professional activity. Nosebagbear (talk) 20:03, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[]
  • I am interested in working for the committee to set up the draft of Universal Code of Conduct. Li-Yun Lin (talk) 22:16, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[]

Phase 1 drafting committee members

We are happy to announce that the Universal Code of Conduct drafting committee has been assembled. We had 26 volunteers apply, either by publicly signing up on the Meta page, or by sending an email. Volunteers from 18 different countries applied, speaking 11 different languages.

We had Wikimedian applicants with different levels of experience on-wiki, from someone who started editing only last year to people who have been editing for more than 18 years and/or have more than 300,000 edits. Applicants held a variety of different roles within the movement, and also informed us about interesting and relevant experiences in their real-life careers. It was very hard to narrow down from this diverse and extremely qualified pool of applicants.

For the final selection, two aspects guided the decision making - we want a committee that at the one hand will represent important parts of the movement. Prolific editors as well as Wikimedians whose strength is more in organizing events, Wikimedians from different demographics, contributors from small and large wikis, and people holding different roles within the movement. We also wanted a group of people who will collaborate with one another effectively and create the best possible Universal Code of Conduct for the Wikimedia movement. Experience has taught us that committees that are too large find it difficult to work effectively, so we decided to cap the number of seats to 6 volunteer seats and 3 staff seats. Please note that more chances for engagement are coming up during the community draft review period starting from August 24.

Phase 1 volunteers

  • Civvì
  • ProtoplasmaKid - reserve member, joined Aug. 18 (Founder Wikimedia Mexico chapter)
    • masti member stepped down
  • RachelWex (St. Cloud State University, US, associate professor)
  • Sami Mlouhi (President Wikimedia Tunisia User Group, Secretary Wikimedia Affiliates Committee)
  • Uzoma (Wikimedia Incubator)

Phase 1 staff members

Phase 1 advisory roles

The Universal Code of Conduct Drafting committee is being supported by Wikimedia Foundation staff in terms of logistics and coordination, but also from community members offering insights and draft feedback through Advisory roles. They provided insights about specific processes, such as running content drives, starting new editing communities, keeping real-life events safe, and serving on movement committees. Advisory roles were selected from interested parties who offered some of these relevant experiences during the application period for the Drafting Committee.

How do Advisory members take part in the process?

Advisory members will be supported by staff to provide focused insights, data, and experiences to the Drafting Committee through interviews, written briefs, and informational video call sessions. Their input will also inform Phase 2 of the UCoC project.

Phase 1 advisory members

  • ANKAN, advisor providing insights from the perspective of a chapter in South Asia.
  • Bobbyshabangu, advisor providing insights into the situation of African minority language communities and from the perspective of an African chapter.
  • Joy sagar Murmu, advisor providing insights into the situation of a minority language community with a relatively new wiki.
  • Nattes à chat, advisor providing insights into the situation for female organizers and women editing the projects.
  • Protoplasmakid, advisor providing insights into Latin American communities and connections between behavioural issues and Human Rights issues. Protoplasmakid stepped up to the drafting committee on Aug 18.
  • RFarrand (WMF), advisor providing insights about behavioural issues at events and her experience with the application of relevant existing policies.

Phase 1 meeting summaries

Please see this subpage for summaries of the 9 Phase 1 meetings: Universal Code of Conduct/Drafting committee/Phase 1 meeting summaries.