Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2020/Votes/Lionel Scheepmans

< Stewards | Elections 2020
Warning

The 2020 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Lionel Scheepmans

edit
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: fr-N, pt-3, en-3, es-2, it-1, de-1, nl-1, bm-1, ta-1, vi-1.
  • Personal info: (English)
    Dear wikimedian people,

    My real name is my user name : Lionel Scheepmans. I am a French native speaker Belgian guy borns in 1969. I can easely communicate in English and Portuguese and I also have some basic capacities in Spanish, German, Dutch and also Malinké, Tamil and Vietnamese language. Finally, I'm also a good user of Deepl for European languages and Google translate for other one  .

    All my background is displayed on my Meta-Wiki user page and all my curriculum and academic works on my French Wikiversity user page. My complete CV is also available on this page. In summary, I am very active on Wikimédia Movement on line since 2011 and off line since 2014. I am one of the founding member of Wikimedia Belgium chapter, and I'm actually in the board since two years with cumulative function of administrator in our wiki-site. I've started to be administrator in fr.wikiversity in 2015 and more recently, I've took back the interface administration. All statistical information about my online activities can be check on the Wikiscan tool.

    Actually PhD student in anthropology making my thesis about Wikimedia movement, I feel very confident about what I can bring to the Wikimedia movement as a steward. If I'm selected, my knowledge of minority cultures and my experience of living in the "Global South" (Africa, India, South America) will certainly help me in my interventions on Wiki projects created in minority languages than we all want, I think, see developing.

    A nice end of the day to all! Lionel
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2020/Questions#Lionel_Scheepmans


  Yes

edit
  1. Eggishorn (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Eggishorn (talk) 19:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
       MarieVirtuElle (Not eligible, checked by NahidSultan) •  MarieVirtuElle (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Krzysiek 123456789 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Krzysiek 123456789 (talk) 20:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Gotanda (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2020 •  Gotanda (talk) 00:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Sg7438 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Sg7438 (talk) 09:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Gereon K. (talk) 16:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Ruthven (msg) 17:07, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 21:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. LH7605 (Eligible, checked by Vermont)2020 •  LH7605 (talk) 01:13, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Gharouni (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Gharouni 03:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. SickManWP (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  I think he can be do this very need job--SickManWP (talk) 05:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Authueil (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Authueil (talk) 06:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Veracious (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Veracious (talk) 14:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. La coince (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  ok La coince (talk) 19:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Bwag (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Bwag (talk) 09:54, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15. SHISHIR DUA (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  SHISHIR DUA (talk) 11:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Ccmarathe (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Ccmarathe (talk) 04:40, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Axel xadolik (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Axel xadolik (talk) 11:36, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Jfblanc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Jfblanc (talk) 14:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Frettie (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Frettie (talk) 18:05, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Omondi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Omondi (talk) 20:21, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Arbnos (talk) 20:45, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Rjelves (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Rjelves (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Thanks for your contributions to the WikiJournals and Wikiversity! --Marshallsumter (talk) 01:05, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Omondi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Omondi (talk) 10:15, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  25. LilyKitty (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  I hope multilingual development of Wikimedia icluding on monority language. LilyKitty (talk) 16:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Onverwacht (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Onverwacht (talk) 07:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Dmehus (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Why not? Smart + collegial and friendly + clue = global mop Dmehus (talk) 21:27, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Matarimi1 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Matarimi1 (talk) 11:20, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Fernando de Gorocica (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Fernando de Gorocica (talk) 12:03, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Cedalyon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Cedalyon (talk) 18:46, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Caligatus (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 • --Caligatus (talk) 22:39, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Jeffrey Kim (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Jeffrey Kim (talk) 05:04, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Hyperdieter (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Hyperdieter (talk) 14:49, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  34. MJL (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Solely voting yes to counteract Mardus's no vote based on bad grammar which I just find absurd. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 17:08, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Cabeza2000 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Cabeza2000 (talk) 17:11, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  36. WikiLester (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  WikiLester (talk) 18:23, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Boobarkee (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Boobarkee (talk) 10:01, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  38. LPS and MLP Fan (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 21:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Zbrnajsem (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  There are good reasons to vote for him, even if there is almost no hope now that he will prevail. Zbrnajsem (talk) 11:13, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Dravinia (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Dravinia (talk) 13:02, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Jusjih (talk) 03:22, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Chipermc (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Chipermc (talk) 04:02, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  --Ferran Mir (talk) 11:03, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Ameisenigel (talk) 19:30, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
       Fatih Demirci (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Fatih Demirci (talk) 16:18, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Stephan Tournay (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Stephan Tournay (talk) 22:57, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
       Dany Crash (Not eligible, checked by xaosflux) •  Dany Crash (talk) 23:31, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Comte0 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Comte0 (talk) 10:01, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Zervim (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Zervim (talk) 20:47, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Epicgenius (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  epicgenius (talk) 21:27, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Novak Watchmen (talk) 22:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (talk) 07:39, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  51. 游魂 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  游魂 07:47, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Oppose. Reading through the questions I just get the sense they think being a steward is being on a global Arbitration Committee or Governing Committee, which it is not. I mean, I get that not all stewards are countervandalism fighters, but then I would expect some more involvement in things like Meta RFCs or on policy discussions on Meta (or even serving as a bureaucrat) - and I don't see that. I just don't think this is a good fit overall - maybe something like the Language committee would be better. Rschen7754 14:04, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. 5LZ (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Excuse my offense, but stewards are no Wikimedia politicians, and we are not electing a congressman. 5LZ 14:09, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi user:Stryn, why did you accept this offensive vote coming from a non registered user ? Stewards are not Wikimedia politicians ? But this election is purely a political affair, and I wonder to see how to deal when an illegitimate offensive vote had probably influence the point of view of all next votes. What are thinking the rest of the electoral comity ? @DerHexer, Linedwell, Mardetanha, and RadiX: Lionel Scheepmans ✉ Contact French native speaker, sorry for my dysorthography 10:21, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Lionel Scheepmans: They underwent a varnishing. When Stryn checked the vote, they are still called 5LZ. As of validity of varnished user votes, some projects like commons still count them as valid votes. No comments with regard to other aspects of your question. Best Regards,--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:38, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks Camouflaged Mirage, is that possible in this case to know the new user accompt of the reformed 5LZ ? Lionel Scheepmans ✉ Contact French native speaker, sorry for my dysorthography 14:27, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    They didn't have a new account, just renamed to Renamed user 9ff13960de57f6ee9b1a65311efbb0be. @Lionel Scheepmans:--Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:30, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok Camouflaged Mirage ! Thanks again, It's look more like a IPV6 adresse than a user name. That's why I didn't understood the rename. I've change the user name of the vote to avoid other misunderstood and keep the transparency on the process. Lionel Scheepmans ✉ Contact French native speaker, sorry for my dysorthography 14:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. -revi (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  User:-revi/SEV; fails 1, 2, 3 — regards, Revi 14:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  CptViraj (📧) 14:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  TonyBallioni (talk) 14:14, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. 1997kB (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  From answers to questions it does looks like they don't know what this role is about. Plus lack of crosswiki experience. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  I think stewards should have a longer tenure in administration functions first, while you have been active in fr wikiversity, I'd prefer to see tenure in larger projects first. — xaosflux Talk 14:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Minorax (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Poor answers to questions, I expect slightly more. Regretful, I know you are in good faith. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Turkmen (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 • --Turkmen talk 14:55, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. KPFC (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  KPFC 💬 14:59, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Not going to pile on with a lengthy oppose but I agree with Rschen. Praxidicae (talk) 15:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Stwalkerster (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  stwalkerster (talk) 16:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020 •  Inadequate experience Herby talk thyme 16:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Misunderstanding of the steward role. Esteban16 (talk) 17:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Not suitable. Trijnsteltalk 17:54, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  The answers to the questions doesn't convince me. Also, cross-wiki experience for me is little. --Stïnger （会話） 18:14, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18. RhinosF1 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Per others RhinosF1 (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Ankry (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC) To be clear: my vote is based on responses to the questions, not suggested by anything else or anybody else. Ankry (talk) 15:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  20. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  *Youngjin (talk) 20:38, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Sintakso (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Unconvincing statement and answers Sintakso (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  per Rschen7754 Klaas `Z4␟` V:  00:48, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Not seeing enough cross-wiki experience to support a candidate like this. Hiàn (talk) 02:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Vermont (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  as per Rschen7754 Vermont (talk) 03:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Hégésippe Cormier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Hégésippe | ±Θ± 09:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Grasyop (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Défaut de confiance. Lack of confidence. Grasyop ✉ 09:15, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Jules78120 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  User of good will, but I'm not convinced at all by answers to questions. — Jules Talk 10:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Thibaut120094 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Like Jules78120 said, user of good will, but not enough cross-wiki and technical experience. Thibaut (talk) 11:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  30. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Pallerti)2020 •  Mostly per Rschen's reasons, but I hope Lionel will try again next year 1ForTheMoney (talk) 12:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Per reasons given above. Daniuu (talk) 14:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  32. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  MZaplotnik(talk) 15:24, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  33. ST47 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Does not appear to be qualified for the role. ST47 (talk) 17:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Linedwell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Linedwell [talk] 19:33, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Hadrianus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Hadrianus (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Streetdeck (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  --Wright Streetdeck 04:49, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:59, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  cyrfaw (talk) 13:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Vmavanti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Vmavanti (talk) 17:13, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  40. AFBorchert (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Thanks for the offer but I miss the necessary experience with currently less than 20,000 overall contributions. In addition, stewards should be familiar with common English technical terms of Wikimedia projects but this is apparently not the case. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:59, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Waddie96 (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Per Rschen7754 Waddie96 (talk) 19:49, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 22:07, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Tymon.r (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Not yet. But have a great day and thank you for this application! Tymon.r (talk) 01:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Mercy (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Mercy (talk) 08:35, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Rzuwig► 11:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Der-Wir-Ing (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Der-Wir-Ing ("DWI") talk 20:21, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Juanmachavez7 (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Juanmachavez7 (talk) 01:31, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Arraque (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Arraque (talk) 14:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Good intentions but the work doesn't meet up with it. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:04, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  50. ManuRoquette (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Not convinced ManuRoquette (talk) 18:06, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  51. John M Wolfson (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Per all. John M Wolfson (talk) 21:15, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  as per Rschen and AFBorchert. –Davey2010Talk 22:57, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  53. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  DannyS712 (talk) 05:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  54. DeltaQuad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Not aware enough to know about the ANPIP/N - how will they know when to hand out the tools?.... -- Amanda (aka DQ) 15:47, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Mardus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Grammar inconsistencies in the user's statement. Mardus (talk) 11:50, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Kostas20142 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Per Amanda and the rest Kostas20142 (talk) 23:57, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Nightenbelle (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Unsatisfactory answers to questions posed. Nightenbelle (talk) 15:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  User doesn't have enough cross-wiki experience. --Uğurkenttalk 18:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  59. WikiAviator (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Insufficient Eng skills. WikiAviator (talk) 04:36, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  60. OhKayeSierra (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  per Rschen and AFBorchert. OhKayeSierra (talk) 04:24, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Tazkeung (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Tazkeung (talk) 09:35, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  62. 悔晚斋 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  悔晚斋 (talk) 12:49, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 14:07, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Pawnkingthree (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Pawnkingthree (talk) 14:12, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Hannes 24 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Hannes 24 (talk) 17:42, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Jni (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  jni (talk) 06:42, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  You are weak in mathematics. You do not understand, what does ln(3t+25) means. Taivo (talk) 16:53, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  68. TJH2018 (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  TJH2018talk 22:29, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Brown Chocolate (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  Brown Chocolate (talk) 09:55, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  70. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 07:23, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  71. NickK (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  That's not really a kind of profile suitable for stewardship. Comments in this nomination, including confusing a vanished user and an IPv6, are seriously concerning — NickK (talk) 13:38, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  2. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  I agree with Rschen7754 and Camouflaged Mirage. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  --Mirer (talk) 19:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:36, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Fanchb29 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  -- Fanchb29 (talk) 13:54, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Daniel J Zhao (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Daniel J Zhao (talk) 14:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Miniapolis 16:26, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  De bonne volonté mais j'ai l'impression étrange qu'il se trompe d'élection. Cbyd (talk) 21:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Fenikals (talk) 18:15, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Borschts (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Borschts (talk) 01:19, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. 人人生來平等 (Eligible, checked by Pallerti)2020 •  人人生來平等 (talk) 05:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Stephan1000000 (talk) 12:56, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Saederup92 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Saederup92 (talk) 12:56, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Rots61 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Rots61 (talk) 21:33, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Too little experience. Meiræ 01:18, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Dede2008 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Dede2008 (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 13:04, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  19. CactusWriter (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  CactusWriter (talk) 15:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  20. OSeveno (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  --oSeveno (talk) 12:48, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  21. NGC 54 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  --FonAfon (talk | contribs) 13:03, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  22. JogiAsad (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  JogiAsad (talk) 13:23, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Geonuch (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Geonuch (talk) 01:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  24. AGK (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  AGK ■ 07:57, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Patsagorn Y. (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Patsagorn Y. (Talk) 08:11, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Darkhan 16:45, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Garam talk 18:48, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Tomec (Eligible, checked by OhKayeSierra)2020 •  Tomec (talk) 22:28, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Cabayi (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Cabayi (talk) 12:28, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  30. RudolfSimon (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  RudolfSimon (talk) 23:55, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Eihel (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2020 •  Les réponses "écrèment" les candidatures: si votre présentation est "alléchante", vos réponses démontrent un manque de connaissances flagrant. Ces connaissances sont cruciales pour ce rôle prenant au demeurant. Eihel (talk) 21:21, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2020/Votes/Lionel_Scheepmans&oldid=24929712"