Community Wishlist Survey 2021/Notifications

Notifications
7 proposals, 163 contributors, 211 support votes
The survey has closed. Thanks for your participation :)



Alert after adding or removal a CSD tag

Edit proposal/discussion

  • Problem: On smaller wikis, pages that are marked with CSD tags can survive for a long period, even if there are active administrators.
  • Who would benefit: Users who choose to activate this feature from Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-echo.
  • Proposed solution: Adding an option (that per default, it should be disabled) at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-echo. If you choose to activate that feature: if a CSD tag is added/removed in/from a page, you will receive an alert about that. In order to work, all CSD tags should contain "<includeonly>__ECHOCSD__</includeonly>" (the adding/removal of this magic world should trigger the alert). If there are added more than one CSD tags in page, you should receive only one alert, to prevent spamming. Also if there are added further additional CSD tags or if there are removed some CSD tags, but not the last (you should be announced only if the last CSD tag is removed from a page). To prevent the adding of __ECHOCSD__ magic word without a CSD tag, it should be created an abuse filter which stop other users to add this magic word in a page, but allows them to place it if they place a CSD tag.
  • More comments: Something similar it could be created for unblock requests.
  • Phabricator tickets:
  • Proposer: --NGC 54 (talk / contribs) 12:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Discussion

  • Would you please clarify what a "CSD tag" is? --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 15:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
    @Matěj Suchánek: A CSD tag is something like en:w:Template:Db. --NGC 54 (talk / contribs) 15:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Why a notification? Is the intent so that you can go in restore the speedy deletion template? Why not use AbuseFilter to prevent this from happening in the first place? Another option is to tag edits that remove speedy deletion templates for later review. MusikAnimal (WMF) (talk) 17:01, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
    @MusikAnimal (WMF): "Why a notification[...]in the first place?" this is a better variant. --NGC 54 (talk / contribs) 17:27, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
    Additional, you could receive an alert if a page created by you was deleted, it was marked with a CSD tag or the CSD tag(s) from a page created by you has/have been removed. --NGC 54 (talk / contribs) 17:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Voting

Automatically Notify a User when ANY of their subpages are edited

Edit proposal/discussion

  • Problem: Any edits made to User subpages, or their associated talk pages, fail to result in an automatic notification (unlike edits to the main User Page and Talk Page. This leaves all subpages not only open to bad faith editing, but also to a failure of the Notification system to alert the User of a genuine attempt to communicate on any of those subpages. After all, each User sub-page still has its own Talk page - it's just that notifications of edits there don't get sent.
  • Who would benefit: All Users who maintain one or more subpages in their userspace.
  • Proposed solution: Ensure an automatic notification is sent to the User whenever another editor changes content on any of their subpages
  • More comments:
  • Phabricator tickets: Send a notification when someone else edits your userpage and Extend edit-user-talk notification to include edits to subpages of a user's talk page
  • Proposer: Nick Moyes (talk) 22:47, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Discussion

I agree notifications are crucial for keeping the community interactive. I also lack notifications for inline comments in all Talk pages (in case no explicit ping is made). Cheater no1 (talk) 10:45, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Seems reasonable. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | enwiki 00:08, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

  • I think this proposal is more specific than it should be. Really, there should be a way to watch for changes to subpages of any given page (or pages in any category, for that matter), and for any set of watched pages to generate notification. It might be worthwhile to have one's own page "watched" in that manner by default (in a way that can be disabled), but there should be more fine control over monitoring for changes in general. --Yair rand (talk) 07:13, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Voting

  •   Support Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 18:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Dr747 (talk) 18:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Sgd. —Hasley 18:44, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --NGC 54 (talk / contribs) 19:30, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Akela (talk) 20:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Nehaoua (talk) 21:51, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support YFdyh000 (talk) 23:08, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Redactedentity (talk) 23:45, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support 5225C (talkcontributions) 00:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support PianistHere (talk) 02:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Neutral not without mutepage (phab:T107836) - or some other way to not make this all-or-nothing. — xaosflux Talk 02:33, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support NMaia (talk) 03:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Philbutler (talk) 07:27, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Mbkv717 (talk) 07:45, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Samwalton9 (talk) 09:49, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Thomas Kinz (talk) 11:37, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Not just sub-pages, but the user page too! Lugnuts (talk) 12:34, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support ‐‐1997kB (talk) 13:52, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Strong supportRhododendrites talk \\ 14:56, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support ForzaGreen (talk) 16:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support JAn Dudík (talk) 20:13, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support dwf² (talk) 23:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Eddie891 (talk) 23:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Blue Rasberry (talk) 01:52, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support - Darwin Ahoy! 02:09, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Amanda (aka DQ) 03:14, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support // Lollipoplollipoplollipop :: talk 05:27, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support JPxG (talk) 05:58, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support. Meiræ 15:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Shyamal (talk) 16:32, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Libcub (talk) 20:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Paucabot (talk) 12:16, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Dreamy Jazz talk to me | enwiki 16:40, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Noel baran (talk) 16:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support AinScept (talk) 17:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Szalax (talk) 17:14, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support James Martindale (talk) 17:18, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --YaganZ (talk) 18:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support MathieuMD (talk) 19:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 22:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Xnet1234 (talk) 22:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support As an option. I can see someone maintaining a subpage that maybe they don't always want notifications for, but I would like it myself. Chris857 (talk) 00:44, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support — AfroThundr (u · t · c) 05:04, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support User subpages must be notified to the account owner to verify these issues. WikiFer msg 18:03, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Emperork 🐋🐰 23:53, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Darwinek (talk) 00:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Neutral Est ce vraiment dans l'esprit du wiki ? Modifier une page utilisateur d'un autre arrive déjà souvent dans les modifications récentes "suspectes". Et quand on crée une sous page utilisateur, elle est par défaut dans notre liste de suivi comme n'importe quel page qu'on a créé. -- Nemo Discuter 10:48, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support HAL333 (talk) 21:17, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support ~ Amory (utc) 13:22, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Novak Watchmen (talk) 17:25, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support CPMSmith (talk) 18:13, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Those of us with large watchlists miss user subpage edits all the time.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  07:44, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support β16 - (talk) 09:44, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Jthekid15 (talk) 09:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support SeGiba (talk) 18:10, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Bgrus22 (talk) 21:47, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Migrant (talk) 23:17, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Jstalins (talk) 04:30, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Mohanad Kh Talk 06:12, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Extra999 (talk) 12:33, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   SupportSebastianHelm (talk) 14:40, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Luan (discussão) 19:57, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Sikander (talk) 01:54, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Yes! Had an editor blank a subpage used for notes in an investigation with edit summary "Attack page". When asked about it a much later they insisted "I don't remember that - why you bother me?" Casting aspersions and claiming amnesia was not pleasing. A notification would have been helpful, enabling me to point out the ongoing issue/investigation. Shenme (talk) 06:47, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Kku (talk) 07:12, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Ameisenigel (talk) 15:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support GiFontenelle (talk) 17:21, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support assuming this means user page too? DarkGlow (talk) 21:18, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Nux (talk) 00:34, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Navvvrisk (talk) 04:45, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Malvinero10 (talk) 02:51, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support S8321414 (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support NicoScribe (talk) 16:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Thibaut (talk) 16:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Nachtbold (talk) 17:00, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Categorize notifications

Edit proposal/discussion

  • Problem: Every notification is just listed with barely few to no categories, especially those who contribute to one project (or just a few)
  • Who would benefit: Editors
  • Proposed solution: Categorize notifications into: Talk page message / Security / User mentions / You've got email / Others, etc.
  • More comments: This will mean revamp of the notifications system, and would hope to make some other suggestions (e.g. notification on page being edited) being viable and not overwhelm the whole system
  • Phabricator tickets:
  • Proposer: 1233 T / C 13:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Discussion

  • Add one point: It is dumb to select what category to be notified but, when there are notifications, every category just sits there and mix. Categorizing the type before the message received timestamp can smoothen this issue and enable more notification types to be added while not affecting the ease of use of the notification system.--1233 T / C 14:13, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
  • @1233: I'm not sure I follow. What do you mean by "categories"? As in, the icon you see that indicates what type of notification it is? Or do you feel there should be more notification flyouts (right now there is a button for "alerts" and a button for "notices")? Thanks, MusikAnimal (WMF) (talk) 22:29, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Sort the notifications by category before by time, at here. e.g. when you click the notification button, it can categorize. e.g. Sort thank yous before mentions before left a message before failed attempts, etc.--1233 T / C 06:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Voting

  •   Support --NGC 54 (talk / contribs) 20:19, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Trang Oul (talk) 20:27, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support فكرة رائعة Nehaoua (talk) 21:45, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ciao • Bestoernesto 03:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Cherryblossom000 (talk) 07:17, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support While you're at it, add a note to email notifications that explain that its real email outside of Wikipedia, maybe indicated by showing "to youremailaddress@you.com". Dagelf (talk) 08:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support BoldLuis (talk) 18:03, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support The proposal determines how notifications by category will be configured. WikiFer msg 17:54, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Categorizar notificaciones será útil para TODOS los wikipedistas. Despotismo Ilustrado y Barroco (talk) 19:47, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Lalviarez (talk) 22:43, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Nemo Le Poisson (talk) 10:40, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support HAL333 (talk) 21:20, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Kocgs (talk) 20:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Golmore (talk) 11:13, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support VKG1985 (talk) 18:01, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Neon Richards (talk) 23:24, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Why not? Astronommica (talk) 08:43, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Anjen01 (talk) 20:44, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Supporttyseria 01:48, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support S8321414 (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Real-Time notification

Edit proposal/discussion

  • Problem: Notifications are not Real-Time if encase of surprise block after users save the edit, however this need to be refresh the page to seen notification.
  • Who would benefit: Contributors
  • Proposed solution: while Contributors are editing may receive an notification without refreshing an page, this helpful for slow internet connection and while reading.
  • More comments:
  • Phabricator tickets:
  • Proposer: Farpen (talk) 03:55, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Discussion

  • Hi Farpen. I have some questions about your proposal. You mention blocks in your "problem" statement. Is that an example of how you came up with this idea? Would your wish be for "real-time" notifications that don't require a page refresh even if those notifications are not about blocks? What other kinds of notifications would be helpful as "real-time" notifications? --AEzell (WMF) (talk) 23:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
    • If user was blocked from editing, a "you have a new message" will appear without refreshing, but if user tried to save an edit then an blocked text will appear. Other kind of notification like alerts from "your edit was reverted", "your edit has thanked" and "article reviewed". It maybe useful for any kind of notification like "alerts" and "notices". "Real-Time" notification are not required to refresh an page, those user was blocked without warning may not received an notification and may see a block notice. -Farpen (talk) 02:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Voting

  •   Support --NGC 54 (talk / contribs) 20:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I often receive talk page vandalism white reading something. I see it after it's already reverted by someone else. Stryn (talk) 20:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support وهذم مشكلة أعاني منها شخصيًا Nehaoua (talk) 21:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Barcelona (talk) 22:51, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support YFdyh000 (talk) 23:07, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support real time is better to not waste your time while changes you are unaware of have happened Leftowiki (talk) 00:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support NMaia (talk) 03:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Opalzukor (talk) 08:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Samwalton9 (talk) 09:49, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support ‐‐1997kB (talk) 13:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support--6PO (talk) 14:49, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Rafael (stanglavine) msg 18:51, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Supportputnik 19:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support dwf² (talk) 23:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I can already imagine my additional mobile data charges. H78c67c (talk) 01:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support SunDawn (talk) 03:31, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support 14:22, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   I don't think so. Enjoyer of World (talk) 06:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support BoldLuis (talk) 18:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support That would be great Xnet1234 (talk) 22:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Proposal needed for people who have access to low-speed Internet and can receive notifications in real time. WikiFer msg 17:59, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Useless. If someone is blocked, they'll find out soon enough. We have no need to add features for the benefit of problem users.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  07:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I think it should be an option you can change. Positron832 (talk) 17:05, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Dey.sandip (talk) 15:58, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support S8321414 (talk) 14:33, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Nachtbold (talk) 17:02, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Logout confirmation dialog

Edit proposal/discussion

(Machine translation from Japanese to English.)

  • Problem : When I click the "Logout" menu displayed at the top right of the Wikipedia page, the logout is executed immediately. I want you to implement a function that displays a dialog asking if you really want to log out in case you click "Logout" due to an operation mistake even though you do not intend to log out. ..
  • Who can help : All users who may click "Logout" due to an operation error
  • Proposed resolution :
  • Other comments :
  • Phabricator Tickets :
  • Proposer: Keruby (talk) 04:04, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Discussion

  • I've discussed a 2-step process for logout somewhere on Phabricator. Not sure where off the cuff. And I feel like this may be a previous proposal? --Izno (talk) 05:14, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
    @Izno I think you mean phab:T217914TheDJ (talkcontribs) 13:19, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Courtesy pinging community participants of en-WP Village pump discussion who haven't voted yet (apologies if I missed/repeated anyone). @Anita5192, Fuzheado, Randy Kryn, Arnabsaha, Forbes72, Johnuniq, Ovinus Real, Enjoyer of World, Herbfur, JGHowes, RoySmith, 2pou, and Aza24: Please feel free to weigh in on this. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 19:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  • For anything that makes logging out harder, it's worth thinking about the impact on people who intentionally attempt to log out in a rush, and simply click the link and leave without realizing that they will still have to click something else (and consequently not actually being logged out); there were suggestions to make this out-in only, which potentially alleviates this concern. Another thought that comes to mind is having a countdown timer that starts after the clicking "Log out" (e.g. for 30 seconds or a minute) so that if the user doesn't either confirm the intent to log out or cancel the action altogether within that time, the user will still be logged out; that's an idea inspired by what I've seen on some operating systems, and may help if the user actually clicked it then left in a rush as I described earlier. Hazard-SJ (talk) 06:31, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
    A countdown seems reasonable. Making this opt-in, however, would greatly diminish its reach, as most people who would want it won't enable it. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 08:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
    Expanding on that thought, I'm imagining that clicking on logout would pop up the box with two options, one of which says something like "yes I really mean to log out" and clicking on it log you out immediately. The second says, "no I didn't really need to log out" and clicking on that undoes the logout request. If neither are clicked, the logout proceeds after some period of time even if you closed your browser and turned off the computer. I think 30 seconds is more than long enough but I'll leave that detail to others. It should be the default not an opt in.--Sphilbrick (talk) 14:28, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Y a t-il des personnes qui peuvent témoigner s'être déjà accidentellement déconnecté ? Il faudrait voir le pourcentage car j'ai l'impression que c'est plus contre-productif qu'autre chose et que ça fera perdre du temps. -- Nemo Discuter 12:11, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Voting

  •   Support But this feature should be able to be enabled/disabled from preferences. --NGC 54 (talk / contribs) 20:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Trang Oul (talk) 20:25, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support should be able to be enabled/disabled from preferences. Akela (talk) 20:33, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Nehaoua (talk) 21:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 21:55, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support, I'm always clicking the Logout link by accident. Abductive (talk) 23:50, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support As an opt-in feature,sure. — xaosflux Talk 02:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Yes! Should definitely have an opt-out option, though. Ezlev (talk) 03:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support As an opt-in feature, sure. Sashatrk (talk) 04:52, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Mbkv717 (talk) 07:46, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support This should be a trivial change that is clearly wanted. It got overwhelming approval at w:Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_173#Log_out_second_chance. If anyone wants to garner a bunch of votes for this, I'd suggest pinging all the participants of that discussion. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 10:08, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Sohom Datta (talk) 11:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support ‐‐1997kB (talk) 13:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Sgd. —Hasley 14:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --6PO (talk) 14:51, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Rafael (stanglavine) msg 18:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Supportputnik 19:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Unintenional logout is very annoying when I must use 2FA for log-in again in all my devisec... JAn Dudík (talk) 20:13, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support - Darwin Ahoy! 02:09, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support JPxG (talk) 06:01, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support הארי פוטר 73 (talk) 08:53, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Majavah (talk!) 10:01, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support 14:23, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support. Meiræ 15:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I'd support a gadget or opt-in pref. Izno (talk) 22:37, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Some1 (talk) 04:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Stryn (talk) 06:19, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Cgl02 (talk) 15:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Dreamy Jazz talk to me | enwiki 16:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Mathieugp (talk) 18:03, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support. Herbfur (talk) 20:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support. I often click the Logout link by accident. I think this feature should be able to be enabled/disabled from preferences.—Anita5192 (talk) 20:29, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support, and while we're at it, logging out from one session should not invalidate all of your login sessions on other devices. RoySmith (talk) 20:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support have long favored this as an optional feature to solve inadvertent logout, especially on small smartphone displays. JGHowes talk - 20:53, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support. I never logged out accidentally but gonna reaffirm my support. Enjoyer of World (talk) 22:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Good idea :) Robins7 (talk) 22:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Xnet1234 (talk) 22:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Yes! Opt in/out through preferences would probably be the best approach. Aza24 (talk) 00:15, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support The proposal is good because it gives the user another opportunity to decide if he wants to click on "Logout". WikiFer msg 18:24, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support As an opt-in pref Emperork 🐋🐰 23:55, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Darwinek (talk) 00:07, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Strong oppose Also "I never logged out accidentally" Vérifions d'abord si cela arrive à des gens. Nemo Le Poisson (talk) 10:44, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Geert Van Pamel (WMBE) (talk) 21:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support —— Eric Liu留言百科用戶頁 11:59, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Boehm (talk) 17:04, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Tom Rheker (talk) 21:33, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support The Grid (talk) 18:06, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support SeGiba (talk) 18:11, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Mohanad Kh Talk 06:10, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Preferably opt-out, but in any case this would save some headaches. Remagoxer (talk) 23:30, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Lt2818 (talk) 03:04, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Ameisenigel (talk) 15:34, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   SupportOvedc (talk) 19:24, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Two-step log-outs are very irritating Mmitchell10 (talk) 21:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Neon Richards (talk) 23:23, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Per NGC 54 Astronommica (talk) 08:43, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I like the countdown option, although I would go for 5 or 10 seconds. --Sphilbrick (talk) 14:24, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support with an option to disable it. -- CptViraj (talk) 06:26, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Strong oppose - This violates the usability principle of Never Use a Warning When you Mean Undo. If a user logs out accidentally, they can easily undo the action by logging back in. 99.9% of the time, this extra warning will be a hurdle and waste of time. — Omegatron (talk) 15:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support S8321414 (talk) 14:33, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Thibaut (talk) 16:59, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Safari Push Notifications

Edit proposal/discussion

  • Problem:
  • Who would benefit: Every registered user who receives messages
  • Proposed solution: see here
  • More comments:
  • Phabricator tickets:
  • Proposer: -Killarnee (CTU) 23:40, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Discussion

Voting

  •   Support Imetsia (talk) 18:53, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support ThadeusOfNazereth (talk) 19:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support جيدة Nehaoua (talk) 21:44, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support YFdyh000 (talk) 23:07, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ciao • Bestoernesto 02:52, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support RobertBlinov (talk) 10:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment Everybody doesn't use Safari. Not that the idea is a bad one, but to treat it as urgent now after all this time and in this time of grand proposals? Is it really so urgent? Tyrekecorrea (talk) 20:06, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support As painful as it is, Safari should be supported. // Lollipoplollipoplollipop :: talk 05:31, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Actually, using the web-standard Notifications API would be ++. Izno (talk) 22:36, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I don't really know how Safari Push works. However, notifications are further improved, only seeing in practice to know. WikiFer msg 18:27, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Rdyornot (talk) 22:33, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Edit Notifications

Edit proposal/discussion

  • Problem: There are some pages where it is important knowing when are edited (ex. Requests to administrators), and just adding them to the watchlist can slow down the response times.
  • Who would benefit: Patrollers, admins, other contributors.
  • Proposed solution: Making users able to create a list of pages that will send them a notification when edited.
  • More comments:
  • Phabricator tickets:
  • Proposer: ValeJappo【〒】 07:45, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Discussion

  • I think it wouldn't be hard to add an option for watchlists to notify, but that would quickly overwhelm the notification system... --Izno (talk) 05:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
It could be arranged in a two-tier system, with normal addition to watchlist working as currently and some specific pages in that list (to be selected by user) also appear as notification.--FAR (talk) 12:12, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Refined options/multiple watchlists, quota system, daily summary and other mechanisms may reduce the consumption.--YFdyh000 (talk) 23:10, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Voting