Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/MIKHEIL

< Stewards | Elections 2016
Warning

These steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

MIKHEIL

edit
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: en-3, fr-3, ru-2, ka-Georgian (native)
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello. My name is Mikheil and I'am from Georgia. I'am administrator and bureaucrat at Georgian Wikipedia. Furthermore, I'am a leader of Wikimedia Community User Group Georgia. Mostly contributing to Georgian Wikipedia since 2010, also contributing some other Wikimedia Projects, including Georgian Wikiquote, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata etc. I can say that Wikimedia projects are as my lifestyle. I will be happy if I'll be able to serve as a steward and help to current stewards and everyone from our different procejcts. I think, diversity within stewards is very important. Thank you for your attention! :)
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#MIKHEIL


  Yes

edit
  1. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  OK for me. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Gereon K. (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Jaba1977 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Jaba1977 (talk) 14:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Holder (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Kosta1986 (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Good job in Georgian Wikipedia. --Kosta1986 (talk) 15:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. ILIA (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --ILIA (talk) 16:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Cekli829 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  OK. --►Cekli829 16:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Arbnos (talk) 16:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Kopiersperre (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Kopiersperre (talk) 16:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Visem (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Visem (talk) 18:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Ejensyd (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ejensyd (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Pkhoveli (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •     Pkhoveli (Talk) 19:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Lika-Kharazishvili (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Lika-Kharazishvili (talk) 19:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Saliner (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Saliner (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. GiorgiXIII (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  GiorgiXIII— The preceding unsigned comment was added by GiorgiXIII (talk) Savhñ 21:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Sortilegus (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Sortilegus (talk) 22:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       沢庵師匠 (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  日本語版をもっと活性化させてください！沢庵師匠 (talk) 22:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hubertl (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Eman235 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Eman235/talk 23:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Zeljko (talk) 00:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Fanchb29 (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2016 •  Fanchb29 (talk) 00:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  HalanTul (talk) 02:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. M Huhn (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  M Huhn (talk) 07:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Babymissfortune (talk) 11:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Deb (talk) 12:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  David1010 (talk) 12:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Vinckie (talk) 12:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Fil211 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Fil211 (talk) 12:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Ellery (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Medgeorgia (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Medgeorgia (talk) 18:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone) •  Risk Engineer (talk) 00:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Veleius
  31. Shelkovoy (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Shelkovoy (talk) 19:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       U-leo (Not eligible, checked by Syum90) •  U-leo (talk) 19:44, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Xoegki (Eligible, checked by 范)2016 •  Xoegki (talk) 04:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Wikibenchris (talk) 11:14, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Remy34 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Remy34 (talk) 11:22, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Саган (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  Саган (talk) 13:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Beqabai (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  ~ბ.ბ.~ (talk) 14:10, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Msannakoval (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Msannakoval (talk) 17:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Walber (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Walber (talk) 21:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Drzewianin (talk) 09:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Seedorfjohnny (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Seedorfjohnny (talk) 16:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Ooo86 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Ooo86 (talk) 11:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Antoine.01 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Antoine.01 (talk) 14:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Fadesga (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  A steward from the Caucasus, very interesting! Fadesga (talk) 23:44, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       LordHello1 (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  LordHello1 (talk) 06:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Kaftaj (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Kaftaj (talk) 09:29, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Hemeier (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Zaza Pachulia! Go for it! Hemeier (talk) 10:29, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Hollingsworth (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Hollingsworth (talk) 21:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. عثمان منصور انصاري (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  عثمان منصور انصاري (talk) 20:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Xatian11968 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Xatian11968 (talk) 17:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. MBurch (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  MBurch (talk) 03:27, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  Shizhao (talk) 07:45, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Geagea (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Geagea (talk) 09:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Nebydlogop (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Nebydlogop (talk) 15:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Noel baran (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Noel baran (talk) 22:00, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Jusjih (talk) 00:13, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Pratyeka (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  +1 multilingual, +1 non-english, +1 addict Pratyeka (talk) 06:31, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Fiqriasidamonize (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Fiqriasidamonize (talk) 08:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Pradeepabk (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  neutral person with good profile.. Pradeepabk (talk) 11:04, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Миша Карелин (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  M.Karelin (talk) 17:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Goombiis (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Goombiis (talk) 00:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. FrankyLeRoutier (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 01:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Yotamsvoray (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Yotamsvoray (talk) 06:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Zangala (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Zangala (talk) 07:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Veto75 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Veto75 (talk) 07:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Atalante88 (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Ok Welcome to diversity with Georgia ! Atalante88 (talk) 09:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Maleine258 (talk) 13:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Armineaghayan (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Mikheil is very active in Georgian Wikipedia. ArmAg 17:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. BluesyPete (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  BluesyPete (talk) 17:51, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Sczipo (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Sczipo (talk) 09:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Garik.Khachatryan (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Garik.Khachatryan --20:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Bogger (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Bogger (talk) 08:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Лукас Фокс (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Лукас Фокс (talk) 10:16, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. The Traditionalist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  The Traditionalist (talk) 13:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Stephen Allcroft (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Stephen Allcroft (talk) 18:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Sodeif (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  you have large experience and you can speaks to many languages Sodeif (talk) 16:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 09:10, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Aydinsalis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Aydinsalis (talk) 22:39, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. NoychoH (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  NoychoH (talk) 12:06, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Romayan (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Romayan (talk) 21:41, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Cbyd (talk) 22:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Xabier Cañas (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Xabier Cañas (talk) 08:03, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Mazuritz (talk) 11:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Proektir (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Proektir (talk) 15:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Tracouti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  --Tracouti (talk) 16:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. ElNuevoEinstein (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  ElNuevoEinstein (talk) 21:08, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Ліонкінг (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Ліонкінг (talk) 23:31, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Banfield (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Banfield - Reclamos aquí 23:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Бемби Крат (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Бемби Крат (talk) 10:07, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  — X-Javier ✉ [m'écrire] 12:28, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  No convincing answer to this question, also no answers to the questions for all users. No explanation in the statement for why he requests stewardship at all. --MF-W 14:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  The answers to the questions asked do not convince me. --Vogone (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Vast experience on home wiki but not globally --Herby talk thyme 14:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --6AND5 (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  As per Herbythyme and Vogone. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 15:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  8. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per MF-Warburg and Vogone. Natuur12 (talk) 15:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ulflarsen (talk) 15:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  85% of their edits are to the Georgian Wikipedia, where all of their sysop+ rights are held. On that wiki, as a bureaucrat he closed this discussion that lasted only a week that removed half of the local administrators under an abnormally high activity requirement of 500 edits and 50 admin actions over 3 months. On a small wiki where something like that could easily go unnoticed, it seems very suspicious to me. With more global activity I might have something more to go off than my suspicions that would provide a more balanced view of this candidate, but I don't, so I have to oppose. Rschen7754 15:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Jahaza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Jahaza (talk) 15:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 16:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Sevimleribo (talk) 17:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  "Diversity within stewards" is indeed important, but without any clear rationale why you want to become a steward I can't support this. Stewards aren't super-admins on their homewiki; there needs to be experience beyond that. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Widr (talk) 17:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Alan (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Laberinto16 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Laberinto16 (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Flyingfischer (talk) 18:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Asav (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Asav (talk) 18:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Unconvincing answers.[reply]
  19. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Armbrust (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Not comfortable, and per Rschen7754. OlEnglish (Talk) 19:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Not enough cross-wiki experience. Miniapolis 19:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Wolmar (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Wolmar (talk) 21:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  ChristophThomas (talk) 21:46, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Per above Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  White Master (es) 22:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  SQLQuery me! 00:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Checkingfax (talk) 02:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  eurodyne (talk) 02:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per Rschen7754, and in addition, lack of answers to questions to all candidates — NickK (talk) 02:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Legoktm (talk) 03:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hkjacksonhk (talk) 03:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  The admin removal on kawiki is very problematic, not done with the necessary caution and patience. Smells a bit like cleaning out unwanted users. The answer concerning this issue is not convincing and doesn't eliminate any doubts of possible foul-play. Don't get me wrong, I am not accusing anyone! Just my 2 cents how neutral folks like me feel about this. Otherwise I don't have any issues with Mikheil. Hedwig in Washington (talk) 04:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Yash! 04:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. MarchHare1977 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  MarchHare1977 (talk) 05:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  nope Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 06:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Gimmy dd (talk) 13:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Not convinced. Per Herbythyme, Rschen7754 and Ajraddatz, among others. Trijnsteltalk 13:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Diversity is important and unfortunately we don't have enough women in the role. Competency and knowledge are important too, and I don't see enough of those.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Lsanabria (talk) 13:56, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  No cross-wiki experience. Per other negative votes. --Uğurkenttalk 16:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  DCB (talk) 18:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Not convinced Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  CLCStudent (talk) 19:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Ernstol (talk) 19:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Gorlingor (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. VanEman (Eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)2016 •  VanEman (talk) 05:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  cyrfaw (talk) 12:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per MF-W. — T. 13:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Holmium (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Holmium (talk) 14:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Discussed with others. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  MelanieN (talk) 22:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Waka Waka (talk) 00:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. 레몬이 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  레몬이 (talk) 06:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Tucoxn (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  - tucoxn\talk 13:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. DrTrumpet (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Missing PRO Arguments DrTrumpet (talk) 13:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Barras (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  I'm not actually convinced. I never noticed you in any relevant and related area to vote in favour for you. -Barras talk 13:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Bikarhêner (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Bikarhêner (talk) 14:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  FASTILY 09:00, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  --Buggia 14:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Snaevar (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  no global rights and not experienced enough.--Snaevar (talk) 19:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 23:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  No enough experiences. Eager Lin (Message) 05:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Hampcky (talk) 22:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Carlotm (talk) 04:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Nannadeem (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Vote in negative is per finding of Hedwig in Washington Nannadeem (talk) 07:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 07:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Reception123 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  After checking global contributions I don't see much global activity. Reception123/Receptie123 (talk) 09:43, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016 •  Gag0409 (talk) 14:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Fuxx (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016 •  Fuxx (talk) 18:29, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  NaBUru38 (talk) 19:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Half past (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016 •  Half past (talk) 23:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Knowledgebattle (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Knowledgebattle (talk) 01:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Az1568 (talk) 02:08, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. -revi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Insufficient global activity. — regards, Revi 07:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Taivo (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  per 500 general and 50 administrative edits during 3 months Taivo (talk) 08:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Rax (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Rax (talk) 22:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC) per Hedwig in Washington regarding the desysop thing - and not answering to open question since 8 February[reply]
  80. Fdssdf (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Fdssdf (talk) 23:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Thogo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  თოგო (D) 23:52, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Gonzo.Lubitsch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 07:06, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  SPQRobin (talk) 11:47, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  84. AdiMind (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  AdiMind (talk) 18:13, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Ringbang (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ringbang (talk) 21:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Courcelles 22:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Berlin-George (talk) 00:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  This candidate did not really answer the questions posed to him. Wpollard (talk) 06:41, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. CaZeRillo (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  CaZeRillo (talk) 09:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  A few too many concerns listed here. Needs some more activity to dispel them, I think. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:31, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. SideshowBob7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  SideshowBob7 (talk) 12:56, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Well, 2 contributions to Wikiversities (good), but none within a year (sad). --Marshallsumter (talk) 15:40, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Mirer (talk) 20:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Qewr4231 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Qewr4231 (talk) 21:28, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Octahedron80 (talk) 13:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Shanmugamp7 (talk) 13:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Cosine02 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Stang 05:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  97. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  KTo288 (talk) 09:16, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Wikifreund (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016 •  Wikifreund (talk) 16:57, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Fordmadoxfraud (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Ford MF (talk) 06:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Tonton Bernardo (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I don't feel well with him. My vote is: no. Tonton Bernardo (talk) 08:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC) Ño - because I don't feel with him. Cannot explain why, just a feeling. Regards to everybody Tonton Bernardo (talk) 08:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC) Tonton Bernardo (talk) 08:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  101. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 14:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  102. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  DangSunM (talk) 20:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Höyhens (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Höyhens (talk) 23:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  per Rschen7754 —Ah3kal (talk) 08:49, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       CrazyD (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  CrazyD (talk) 10:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Timk70 question? 21:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Boshomi (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Boshomi (talk) 23:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 23:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Glaisher (talk) 17:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Glane23 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Geoff Who, me? 22:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Styko (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Styko (talk) 07:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Kadavr2000 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Kadavr2000 (talk) 10:27, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  112. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  The Banner (talk) 14:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Hobbamock (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Hobbamock (talk) 14:29, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Neolexx (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  NeoLexx (talk) 18:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Vachovec1 (talk) 01:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Lawrencedepe (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Lawrencedepe (talk) 08:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  116. J7729 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  J7729 (talk) 08:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Christoph Franzen (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  No answer to important questions, answer to first question basically only refers to the rules; acting according to the rules is not sufficient --CHF (talk) 05:54, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Defrenrokorit (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Defrenrokorit (talk) 06:11, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Base (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Does not look like x-wiki active enough to me, sorry. The considerable contribution to Georgian projects is a very good thing and I am also happy that I had chances to meet the user, but we are talking about a global flag here and I do not see things needed for it's proper handling now. Base (talk) 12:19, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Not convincing answers... Pratyya (Hello!) 12:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Ireas (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  Ireas (talk) 13:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  121. .js (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  .js[democracy needed] 13:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Żyrafał (talk) 16:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Nrautava (talk) 18:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Never seen him outside of kawp. Ghiutun 22:38, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Rahmanuddin (talk) 15:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016 •  Rberchie (talk) 11:14, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  GZWDer (talk) 19:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Magawla61 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Magawla61 (talk) 13:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. DerekvG (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  --DerekvG (talk) 16:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Ananth subray (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Ananth subray (talk) 12:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  VictorBrice (talk) 20:32, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Vimaparo147 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Vimaparo147 (talk) 11:11, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Bernd Bergmann (talk) 20:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Muso (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Muso (talk) 04:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  ysjbserver (talk) 07:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2016/Votes/MIKHEIL&oldid=25313096"