Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2020/Votes/Jfblanc

< Stewards‎ | Elections 2020
Warning

The 2020 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Jfblanc edit

ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: en, oc, cs, ca, fr, es, sk, it, la
  • Personal info: (English)
    Dears, I'm a candidate to the position of Steward to increment one step up my contribution to this universe I am so fond of. My name is Joan Francés Banc (officially for now Jean-François Blanc). I am a sysop and bureaucrat of the Occitan language Wikipedia, and also a regular contributor the oc-wp and to other projects (63404 edits on 740 wikis. Most edits on oc.wikipedia.org (35342). Oldest account on oc.wikipedia.org (2005-09-16 13:34)). I want to help more an bring my "lesser used language" perspective to the stewardry. Feel free to ask any question.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2020/Questions#Jfblanc


  Yes edit

  1. Holder (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 • --Holder (talk) 16:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Krzysiek 123456789 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Krzysiek 123456789 (talk) 20:27, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Darwwin (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  Darwwin (talk) 06:15, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Gereon K. (talk) 16:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 21:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Šedrvan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Šedrvan (talk) 09:57, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Veracious (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Veracious (talk) 14:26, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Perrak (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Perrak (talk) 17:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Fenikals (talk) 18:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. MJL (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Purely moral support. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 23:14, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Tuvalkin (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  I met Jfblanc online back in the 1990s and since then I have seen him several times excelling at conflict resolution and team-building. I have a good impression and we all will gain with Jfblanc as a steward. Tuvalkin (talk) 00:02, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. WrS.tm.pl (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  WrS.tm.pl (talk) 03:09, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Peko (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Peko (talk) 12:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Axel xadolik (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Axel xadolik (talk) 11:35, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Globalphilosophy (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  --Globalphilosophy (-̮̮̃•̃) (ღTalk ♥) 16:13, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Arraque (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Arraque (talk) 14:07, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Omondi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Omondi (talk) 20:22, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18. OSeveno (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  --oSeveno (talk) 12:22, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  19. LilyKitty (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  I hope multilingual development of Wikipedia and Wikimedia. LilyKitty (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Onverwacht (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Onverwacht (talk) 07:09, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Dmehus (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  What MJL said. Dmehus (talk) 21:29, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Caligatus (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 • --Caligatus (talk) 22:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Boobarkee (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Boobarkee (talk) 09:59, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Jusjih (talk) 03:19, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Chipermc (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Chipermc (talk) 04:01, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  --Ferran Mir (talk) 11:00, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
       Dany Crash (Not eligible, checked by xaosflux) •  Dany Crash (talk) 23:32, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Luensu1959 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  I like his engagement for regional wikis like Wiki Occitan Luensu1959 (talk) 10:39, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Epicgenius (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  epicgenius (talk) 21:26, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Novak Watchmen (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Novak Watchmen (talk) 22:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka (talk) 07:36, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Kubura (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Kubura (talk) 12:55, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  No edit

  1. WikiBayer (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •   Strong oppose Has no Hunch about crosswiki work and doesn't know the guidelines--𐐎ℹ𝕜ⅈ𝕭𝒂𝕪ⅇ𝕣 👤💬 14:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Oppose. Very little work in the cross-wiki/policy realm so we don't know what we're getting especially in sensitive issues. Also the log of blocks on ocwiki shows a serious misunderstanding of IPv6 and IPs in general, not good for someone who would have to make global blocks or use CheckUser. Rschen7754 14:03, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. -revi (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  User:-revi/SEV; fails 1, non-response to my Q — regards, Revi 14:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  TonyBallioni (talk) 14:14, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. 1997kB (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Lack of experience and not satisfied with their answers. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  CptViraj (📧) 14:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Minorax (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Sorry, good faith nomination but you seemed not to know sufficient xwiki stuff based on questions and SUL. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Turkmen (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 • --Turkmen talk 14:53, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Steinsplitter (talk) 14:58, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Doesn't understand the role of Stewards, has no experience in areas we expect of stewards or candidates for this position. Praxidicae (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  I believe that the candidate means well, but I'm afraid they lack knowledge and experience. I'm not satisfied with some of their answers. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Érico (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  The candidate seems to be experienced in several projects and the language skills looks great. However, s/he did not demonstrate a good level of activities in the areas related to stewards. Also, the statement is not impressive – far from it. Érico (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Stwalkerster (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  stwalkerster (talk) 16:07, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Does not understand the scope of the steward role Esteban16 (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Not suitable. Trijnsteltalk 17:53, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  No experience. --Stïnger （会話） 18:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  --Mirer (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  19. RhinosF1 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Nomination suggest interested in rights not cross wiki work. Lack of experience RhinosF1 (talk) 18:57, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Ankry (talk) 19:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  21. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  *Youngjin (talk) 20:37, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  22. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  ToBeFree (talk) 21:53, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Sintakso (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Unconvincing statement and answers Sintakso (talk) 21:57, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  per WikiBayer et al Klaas `Z4␟` V:  23:09, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Nate 2169 (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Nate 2169 (talk) 23:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  26. 片割れ靴下 (Eligible, checked by Tks4Fish)2020 •  片割れ靴下 (talk) 23:46, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Incorrect answers to my questions; I'm unfortunately not convinced that you'd be a good fit this time. Leaderboard (talk) 01:29, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Inexperienced overall with cross-wiki affairs but would be happy to reconsider after more global experience in a few years. Hiàn (talk) 02:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Vermont (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Terrible answers to questions, and stopped answering them after some people replied. Evidently has very little understanding of what stewards do and the scope of the role. Vermont (talk) 03:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020 •  Armbrust (talk) 03:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Hégésippe Cormier (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Hégésippe | ±Θ± 09:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Jules78120 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Replies to questions did not convince me. — Jules Talk 10:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020 •  Herby talk thyme 10:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  35. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Pallerti)2020 •  1ForTheMoney (talk) 12:43, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Thibaut120094 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Not convinced by the answers to the questions, lack of experience. Thibaut (talk) 13:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Daniel J Zhao (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Daniel J Zhao (talk) 14:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  38. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  MZaplotnik(talk) 15:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Linedwell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Linedwell [talk] 19:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hadrianus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Hadrianus (talk) 19:50, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Streetdeck (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  I can't support after I read the replication. --Wright Streetdeck 04:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  42. SickManWP (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  I no think he can do this very need job--SickManWP (talk) 05:26, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:02, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  cyrfaw (talk) 13:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Vmavanti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Vmavanti (talk) 17:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  46. AFBorchert (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Thanks for the offer. While I think that experience with smaller projects could be a helpful addition to the steward team, I miss the necessary experience in the typical working fields of stewards (see questions by Vermont in the Q/A section). --AFBorchert (talk) 19:05, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  47. La coince (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Not convinced La coince (talk) 19:44, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Waddie96 (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Not suitable Waddie96 (talk) 19:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 22:06, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Tymon.r (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Per your personal statement. Tymon.r (talk) 01:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Mercy (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Does not have enough experience. Mercy (talk) 08:33, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  – Ammarpad (talk) 11:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Rzuwig► 11:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Der-Wir-Ing (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Der-Wir-Ing ("DWI") talk 20:23, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Statement, answers and cross-wiki experience are not matching expectations for the role. Meiræ 00:57, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  56. The Living love (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  The Living love (talk) 01:45, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Grasyop (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Grasyop ✉ 18:20, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  58. CactusWriter (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  CactusWriter (talk) 15:04, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  No cross-wiki experience. —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 15:05, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  60. John M Wolfson (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  No cross-wiki experience and the candidate statement ("increment one step up") reads an awful lot like treating Wikimedia as an MMORPG. John M Wolfson (talk) 21:12, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Inexperienced editor. –Davey2010Talk 22:50, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  62. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  DannyS712 (talk) 05:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  63. DeltaQuad (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Single wiki sysop with not great answers -- Amanda (aka DQ) 15:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Kurtis (Eligible, checked by Streetdeck)2020 •  Kurtis (talk) 04:07, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Mardus (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Per argumnets by User:Rschen7754, though in not so strong terms. Mardus (talk) 12:13, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Nightenbelle (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  User is not ready, perhaps with more experience. Nightenbelle (talk) 15:03, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Cabeza2000 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Cabeza2000 (talk) 16:52, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  It seems that user didn't perform its admin activities in the local wiki very often. --Uğurkenttalk 18:51, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  69. WikiAviator (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Strong oppose as promoting a minor language isn't a reason why one would like to be a sysop. Disclosure of real-life identity (i.e. in this case your name) is totally inappropriate. WikiAviator (talk) 04:32, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Patriccck (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Per others Patriccck (talk) 13:43, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  71. OhKayeSierra (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  OhKayeSierra (talk) 04:22, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Tazkeung (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Tazkeung (talk) 09:33, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  — xaosflux Talk 14:21, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Centaur271188 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Centaur271188 (talk) 14:09, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Pawnkingthree (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Pawnkingthree (talk) 14:17, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Hannes 24 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Hannes 24 (talk) 17:40, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Ameisenigel (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Ameisenigel (talk) 19:25, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Zppix (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Zppix (talk) 18:18, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Brown Chocolate (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  Brown Chocolate (talk) 10:08, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  80. HMSLavender (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 07:21, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
       Bucksburg (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Bucksburg (talk) 11:18, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Eihel (Eligible, checked by Hasley)2020 •  I would like an Occitan and French speaker to be Stew, but your replies, not only to user:Leaderboard, have definitively dashed my hopes. In addition, there are missing replies. Eihel (talk) 20:05, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  82. NickK (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  An intersting profile, might have been a good fit, but finally no. I was interested in the answer on the question on consensus, and promising to have a look this week end a month and half ago and ultimately not answering is bad for a steward — NickK (talk) 13:52, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral edit

  2. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 14:49, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Miniapolis 16:20, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. ST47 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Could move to support based on upcoming answers to questions, but may not have a chance to based on the current vote tallies... ST47 (talk) 17:33, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Stephan1000000 (talk) 12:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Juanmachavez7 (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Juanmachavez7 (talk) 01:21, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 13:02, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Frettie (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Frettie (talk) 18:04, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. NGC 54 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  --FonAfon (talk | contribs) 13:03, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. JogiAsad (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  JogiAsad (talk) 13:22, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Rots61 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Rots61 (talk) 16:09, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Geonuch (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Geonuch (talk) 01:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. AGK (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  AGK ■ 07:57, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Poti Berik (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Poti Berik (talk) 08:55, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Darkhan (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Darkhan 16:43, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Garam (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Garam talk 18:42, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Tomec (Eligible, checked by OhKayeSierra)2020 •  Tomec (talk) 22:28, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18. TJH2018 (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  TJH2018talk 22:28, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Stephan Tournay (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Stephan Tournay (talk) 22:54, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2020/Votes/Jfblanc&oldid=24929708"