Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2016/Votes/Richwales

< Stewards | Elections 2016
Warning

These steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Richwales (Rich Wales — no relation to Jimbo)

edit
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: en, fr-2, ro-2, es-1, de-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    I'm Richwales, and I am volunteering to serve as a steward.

    I've been a Wikipedian since 2005. Most of my work has been in the English Wikipedia, where I have created two Featured Articles and nine Good Articles. On the English Wikipedia, I am currently an administrator (since 9/2011) and an oversighter (since 11/2014). Additionally, I served on the Audit Subcommittee from 5/2013 to 8/2014 — during which time I had checkuser and oversight rights on the English Wikipedia.

    In addition to my native English, I can read and write French and Romanian, and I have basic proficiency in Spanish and German. I helped rewrite an article in the Romanian Wikipedia in 2007. I understand there are not currently any stewards who admit to knowing Romanian, so hopefully I can be of use there.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2016/Questions#Richwales


  Yes

edit
  1. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Gereon K. (talk) 14:37, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. TeriEmbrey (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • Support! TeriEmbrey (talk) 14:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Roland Kutzki (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Roland Kutzki (talk) 15:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. MannMaus (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 • --MannMaus (talk) 15:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  While Richwales does not have that much crosswiki experience, having personally worked with him during his time as a English Wikipedia sockpuppet investigation clerk, I believe that he would be a good steward and pick up the necessary knowledge quickly. Rschen7754 15:41, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Jahaza (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Jahaza (talk) 15:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Sevimleribo (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  Sevimleribo (talk) 17:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Silenzio76 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Silenzio76 (talk) 17:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Mscuthbert (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Mscuthbert (talk) 19:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. OlEnglish (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Competent OlEnglish (Talk) 20:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Again, per Rschen7754; I've seen their good work on en-WP, and they've been around a long time. Miniapolis 20:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Work2win (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Work2win (talk) 20:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Wolmar (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Wolmar (talk) 21:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Farin12 (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  Farin12 (talk) 22:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. NE Ent (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016 •  NE Ent (talk) 23:36, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Prof tpms (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Very positive and potential candidate. Prof tpms (talk) 23:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Zeljko (talk) 00:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Fanchb29 (Eligible, checked by Ajraddatz)2016 •  Fanchb29 (talk) 00:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       CaptainPiggles (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  CaptainPiggles (talk) 02:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Hedwig in Washington (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  per Rschen7754. Hedwig in Washington (talk) 04:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Yash! (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Yash! 04:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Babymissfortune (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Babymissfortune (talk) 11:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Assianir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Assianir (talk) 11:31, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Deb (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Deb (talk) 12:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Vinckie (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Vinckie (talk) 12:41, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Ellery (talk) 13:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Perhaps he lacks a bit cross-wiki experience, but I fully trust him and I think he could be a good steward. Trijnsteltalk 13:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Suitably trusted, and knowledgeable in complex cases at enWP, and the tools. Not understanding why the role is wanted. Happy to see how it goes for a year and review  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Bff (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Bff (talk) 15:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Kormoran (Not eligible, checked by Riley Huntley) •  Kormoran (talk) 20:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Risk Engineer (Not eligible, checked by Vogone) •  Risk Engineer (talk) 00:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Jrt989 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jrt989 (talk) 01:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Gmcbjames (Eligible, checked by shanmugamp7)2016 •  Gmcbjames (talk) 05:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Timothycrice (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Timothycrice (talk) 05:52, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Mathmensch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  His editing of a Star Trek episode and of the Verhoeff algorithm provides evidence that he's a moral and qualified individual Mathmensch (talk) 13:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Bluemel1 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Bluemel1 (talk) 14:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Holmium (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Holmium (talk) 14:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Zotezangu (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Zotezangu (talk) 15:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Jose Barreto Cegarra (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Jose Barreto Cegarra (talk) 20:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  In a field of poor candidates, he's good enough. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 22:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. MelanieN (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  MelanieN (talk) 22:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Hawkeye7 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016 •  Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Zezen (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  I read his answers, sounds sensible. Zezen (talk) 00:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Waka Waka (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Waka Waka (talk) 01:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. White whirlwind (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  White whirlwind (talk) 01:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Thatonewikiguy (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  Thatonewikiguy (talk) 03:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Vfrickey (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  loupgarous (talk) 04:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Павел Петро (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Павел Петро (talk) 06:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Technopat (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Technopat (talk) 09:00, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Chiumbi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Chiumbi (talk) 09:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Tucoxn (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  - tucoxn\talk 13:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Charles01 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Informative user page and good track record as far as I can fathom it... Charles01 (talk) 17:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Scott Illini (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Scott Illini (talk) 01:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. VMS Mosaic (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016 •  VMS Mosaic (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Savh)2016 •  Rberchie (talk) 11:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Xoegki (Eligible, checked by 范)2016 •  Xoegki (talk) 04:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Aphillipsmusique (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Aphillipsmusique (talk) 05:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Wikibenchris (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Wikibenchris (talk) 11:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Esmatly (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Esmatly (talk) 14:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Geoide (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Geoide (talk) 19:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Hampcky (talk) 22:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Carlotm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Carlotm (talk) 04:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Doctorhawkes (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Doctorhawkes (talk) 06:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Invertiert (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Invertiert (talk) 09:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Ciell (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ciell (talk) 10:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Redgwan (Not eligible, checked by Melos) •  Rezwan (talk) 12:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Seedorfjohnny (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Seedorfjohnny (talk) 16:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Bluehotel (Not eligible, checked by RadiX) •  Bluehotel (talk) 17:25, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Fuxx (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2016 •  Fuxx (talk) 17:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Half past (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016 •  Half past (talk) 23:44, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Knowledgebattle (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Knowledgebattle (talk) 01:32, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Magawla61 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Magawla61 (talk) 13:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Antoine.01 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Antoine.01 (talk) 15:04, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Coffee (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  No concerns here. — Coffee // have a cup // 15:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Rax (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  --Rax (talk) 22:30, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Fadesga (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  OK, let's support a steward who knows Romanian. Fadesga (talk) 23:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       LordHello1 (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  LordHello1 (talk) 06:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Gonzo.Lubitsch (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Gonzo.Lubitsch (talk) 07:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. PsychoticSpartan123 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  PsychoticSpartan123 (talk) 10:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Prestonmag (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Prestonmag (talk) 11:05, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Ster3oPro (Not eligible, checked by Stryn) •  Ster3oPro (talk) 17:05, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Quinto Simmaco (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Quinto Simmaco (talk) 17:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. AdiMind (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  As a Romanian myself, I appreciate to have a Romanian speaker among stewards. AdiMind (talk) 18:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Hollingsworth (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Hollingsworth (talk) 21:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  This candidate has a good range of experience. He may not have a great deal of global experience; that is my only concern. Wpollard (talk) 06:49, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Aydinsalis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Aydinsalis (talk) 13:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Hamedvahid (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Hamedvahid (talk) 18:49, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Rocksanddirt (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Rocksanddirt (talk) 21:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Avraham (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Having worked with Rich for many years on EnWiki, I am very comfortable with his knowledge of the stewardry tools, especially as relates to CU and OS. I agree that his cross-wiki experience is rather light; possibly too light. I was going to vote neutral, and request that he expand his cross-wiki work over the coming year, but I decided that since I really think he would be a benefit to the stewards, and the only reason not to support would be to let him demonstrate his commitment to Wikimedia as a whole and not just EnWiki, I am willing to trust him with the tools now and let him demonstrate that commitment over the coming year. I have no concern that he would abuse the tools or the access to private information (which he has had for years) and I expect him, if he is successful, to demonstrate that commitment to cross-wiki protection and support. I think that having him on the team now would be more of a benefit to the Wikimedia projects as a whole than having him wait a year. Avi (talk) 21:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Robertiki (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Robertiki (talk) 04:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. The ed17 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Per Avi Ed [talk] [en] 06:24, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Ale2006 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  make way for keen people Ale2006 (talk) 12:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  84. LP Martin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  LP Martin (talk) 17:04, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Xatian11968 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Xatian11968 (talk) 17:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  86. MBurch (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  MBurch (talk) 03:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Denisarona (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Denisarona (talk) 07:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  Shizhao (talk) 07:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Nioger (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Nioger (talk) 10:43, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Winterysteppe (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  I believe this person can contribute positively. Winterysteppe (talk) 16:51, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Jusjih (talk) 00:15, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Pratyeka (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  +1 multilingual, +1 first in a language, +1 concise writing style Pratyeka (talk) 06:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Pradeepabk (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Good one Pradeepabk (talk) 11:13, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Oefe (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Oefe (talk) 13:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Wikifreund (Eligible, checked by MarcoAurelio)2016 •  Wikifreund (talk) 16:53, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Rich Farmbrough (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Rich Farmbrough 18:02 20 February 2016 (GMT). 18:02, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Ealdwulf (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ealdwulf (talk) 18:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Ruhrfisch (Not eligible, checked by Alexmar983) •  Ruhrfisch (talk) 23:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Goombiis (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Goombiis (talk) 00:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  97. FrankyLeRoutier (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 01:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Popo le Chien (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  I liked what I read, FWIW. Popo le Chien (talk) 10:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Taketa (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Trusted and capable. Taketa (talk) 10:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Aussie Oc (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Aussie Oc (talk) 11:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  101. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 13:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Maleine258 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Maleine258 (talk) 13:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  103. BluesyPete (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  BluesyPete (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Roxyuru (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Roxyuru 22:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Rsocol (Eligible, checked by Syum90)2016 •  Rsocol (talk) 06:29, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  106. 6AND5 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --6AND5 (talk) 11:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Nordic Dragon (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Nordic Dragon (talk) 14:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       DracoEssentialis (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  He's an en-wp admin, but that shouldn't be held against him. :) DracoEssentialis (talk) 16:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Cirflow (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Cirflow (talk) 02:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Bogger (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Bogger (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Stephen Allcroft (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Stephen Allcroft (talk) 18:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Drmies (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Drmies (talk) 20:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Glane23 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Geoff Who, me? 22:21, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Yakifahmi (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Yakifahmi (talk) 02:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Kadavr2000 (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Kadavr2000 (talk) 10:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Mick Knapton (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Good luck in the election. You'd be a good steward. Mick Knapton (talk) 19:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Somercet (Not eligible, checked by Stryn) •  "ELECTION TOMORROW! VOTE GOAT!" Somercet (talk) 05:36, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Hobbamock (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Hobbamock (talk) 14:31, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  115. VTgrinchenko (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  VTgrinchenko (talk) 05:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Eltargrim (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Eltargrim (talk) 15:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Lutzv (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Lutzv (talk) 16:10, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Neolexx (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  NeoLexx (talk) 18:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Kellyprice (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Kellyprice (talk) 18:46, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Antidiskriminator (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  120. MirkoS18 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  MirkoS18 (talk) 20:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Cbyd (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Cbyd (talk) 22:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Vachovec1 (talk) 01:21, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Mailer diablo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Mailer Diablo (talk) 05:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Lawrencedepe (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Lawrencedepe (talk) 09:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Proektir (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Proektir (talk) 16:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Tracouti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  --Tracouti (talk) 16:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Imbericle (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  For the English Wikipedia. Imbericle (talk) 23:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Muso (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Muso (talk) 04:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Defrenrokorit (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Defrenrokorit (talk) 05:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Christoph Franzen (Not eligible, checked by Steinsplitter) •  --CHF (talk) 05:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  128. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  — X-Javier ✉ [m'écrire] 11:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  No cross-wiki experience (97% of edits on enwiki). From the statement, we also do not get to know why he wants to be a steward ("I am ro-2" seems to be the only reason"). The answer to the question from Steinsplitter also shows a severe lack of knowledge (claiming that global blocks and locks do not apply "to the Meta project"). --MF-W 14:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  For my feeling way too enwiki-centric and does not seem to be very experienced outside of that wiki either. --Vogone (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Insufficient global experience --Herby talk thyme 14:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Golden Bosnian Lily (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Sorry, not enough cross-wiki experience and too much “specialized”. --Laurent Jerry (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Holder (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 • --Holder (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Sorry but user doesn't have the right skillset and doesn't have enough cross wiki experience. Also per Vogone. Natuur12 (talk) 15:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Tommy Kronkvist (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Far to little cross-wiki experience, and the answer to Steinsplitter's question makes me even more doubtful. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  10. Ulflarsen (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ulflarsen (talk) 15:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 16:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Reguyla (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Too confrontational on ENWP. Also not enough crosswiki experience. Reguyla (talk) 17:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  I have no idea why you want to be a steward, or what relevant experience you have. Telling me how many good and featured articles you have on enwiki, and what strange sub-units of ArbCom you might have served on there would be useful on an enwiki RfA, but not on a steward request where we are trying to evaluate your potential to work on cross-wiki issues that extend well beyond the two languages that you speak. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Widr (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Widr (talk) 17:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Hypergio (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  НУРшЯGIO(beware of the moose) 17:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Alan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Alan (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Nrautava (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  lacking crosswiki experience Nrautava (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Asav (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Asav (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Laberinto16 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Laberinto16 (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Armbrust (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  ChristophThomas (talk) 21:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Riley Huntley (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Per Ajraddatz Riley Huntley (talk) 22:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Atcovi (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  No cross-wiki experience Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. White Master (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  White Master (es) 22:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Hubertl (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hubertl (talk) 00:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Teles (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 00:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. SQL (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  SQLQuery me! 00:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Checkingfax (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Checkingfax (talk) 02:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. SSTflyer (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  not enough cross-wiki experience. SSTflyer (talk) 02:06, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  30. HalanTul (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  HalanTul (talk) 02:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  31. NickK (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per MF-Warburg, stating that global locks do not apply to Meta shows that the user does not understand the process well enough — NickK (talk) 02:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Legoktm (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Hkjacksonhk (talk) 03:33, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Hamsterlopithecus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 05:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Gimmy dd (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  Gimmy dd (talk) 12:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Vincenzo1492 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Vincenzo1492 (talk) 16:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  No cross-wiki experience. --Uğurkenttalk 16:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  38. DCB (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  per MF-W DCB (talk) 18:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Not enough cross-wiki experience imo. The nomination statement doesn't really mention why they want to be a steward or what they wish to do as a steward. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Ernstol (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  Ernstol (talk) 19:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Gorlingor (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Gorlingor (talk) 01:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  cyrfaw (talk) 11:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Veleius (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Veleius
  44. Wikitanvir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Per MF-W. — T. 13:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Buggia (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  --Buggia 15:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Discussed with others. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Érico (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  No cross-wiki experience sadly. Érico (talk) 00:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Barras (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Might be a good candidate, however, he clearly misses the needed crosswiki experience. -Barras talk 13:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Omerlaziale (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Omerlaziale (talk) 06:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  per above unfortunately. Limited x-wiki experience FASTILY 09:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Snaevar (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  no global rights, has not created an steward request and has contributions on few wikis compared to other candidates as of feb 1.--Snaevar (talk) 19:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Wagino 20100516 (talk) 23:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  53. 小躍 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  No enough experiences. Eager Lin (Message) 05:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Ferran Mir (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Ferran Mir (talk) 07:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Gag0409 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2016 •  Gag0409 (talk) 14:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  56. -revi (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Not enough xwiki experience. — regards, Revi 17:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Az1568 (talk) 02:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Pgallert (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Pgallert (talk) 19:16, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Fdssdf (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Per others; not enough cross-wiki experience Fdssdf (talk) 23:39, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Thogo (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  თოგო (D) 23:54, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Hemeier (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Hemeier (talk) 10:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Ringbang (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Ringbang (talk) 21:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  63. CaZeRillo (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  CaZeRillo (talk) 09:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  64. SideshowBob7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  SideshowBob7 (talk) 13:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  ZERO contributions to any Wikiversities for someone whose been around so long! Disappointing! --Marshallsumter (talk) 15:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Qewr4231 (Not eligible, checked by Ankry) •  Candidate statement doesn't say much Qewr4231 (talk) 21:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Octahedron80 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Octahedron80 (talk) 13:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Jasper Deng (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  You need to broaden your experience cross-wiki, especially in terms of anti-abuse activities. Consider helping out with SWMT in the meantime. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Cosine02 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Stang 05:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Jo-Jo Eumerus (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Needs some more balanced crosswiki activity. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  70. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Not enough cross-wiki experience KTo288 (talk) 13:25, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       VisaBlack (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  VisaBlack (talk) 18:36, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Fordmadoxfraud (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Ford MF (talk) 06:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Tonton Bernardo (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Optional comment: I looked at some of his edits: there are some open questions on them, and I prefer to vote No. Tonton Bernardo (talk) 08:43, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  73. DerekvG (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  --DerekvG (talk) 16:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Arbnos (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Arbnos (talk) 18:57, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  75. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  per MF-W and Vogone DangSunM (talk) 20:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Timk70 question? 21:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  77. The Traditionalist (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  The Traditionalist (talk) 13:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Glaisher (talk) 17:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Styko (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Styko (talk) 07:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  80. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2016 •  The Banner (talk) 14:14, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Pratyya Ghosh (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Just one reason. "No cross-wiki experience" Pratyya (Hello!) 12:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Base (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  359 edits out of enwiki. Sorry it's an absolute no for now. I would be happy to vote in the section above in a couple of years when the candidate becomes active x-wiki. Base (talk) 12:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Nnemo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Nnemo (talk) 13:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  Neutral --6AND5 (talk) 14:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Żyrafał (talk) 16:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Flyingfischer (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Flyingfischer (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Zunter (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  Zunter (talk) 18:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  eurodyne (talk) 02:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  Ruthven (talk) 11:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  6. David1010 (Eligible, checked by Stemoc)2016 •  David1010 (talk) 12:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2016 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 12:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Lsanabria (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  Lsanabria (talk) 13:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  9. CLCStudent (Eligible, checked by Riley Huntley)2016 •  CLCStudent (talk) 19:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Ghiutun (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Never seen before. Ghiutun 22:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  11. విశ్వనాధ్.బి.కె. (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2016 •  విశ్వనాధ్.బి.కె. (talk) 11:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  12. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Rahmanuddin (talk) 15:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Drzewianin (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Drzewianin (talk) 09:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  14. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  GZWDer (talk) 19:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  Non-existent cross-wiki activity, however, I am comfortable with the candidate having access to tools, per seeing him work on the now-disbanded AUSC. Normally I'd oppose for this little cross-wiki experience, but I trust him enough to land here instead. Courcelles 22:26, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Berlin-George (talk) 00:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Defender)2016 •  Mirer (talk) 20:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Shanmugamp7 (talk) 13:38, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Chrism (Eligible, checked by RadiX)2016 •  Chrism (talk) 00:50, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Ah3kal (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  —Ah3kal (talk) 08:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Yair rand (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2016 •  Per Courcelles. Yair rand (talk) 20:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2016 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 23:44, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Ananth subray (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Ananth subray (talk) 12:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  23. VictorBrice (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  VictorBrice (talk) 20:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Bennylin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Need to increase crosswiki activity first ✒ Bennylin 04:10, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  25. PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 09:29, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
       Vimaparo147 (Not eligible, checked by 6AND5) •  Vimaparo147 (talk) 11:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  26. NoychoH (Eligible, checked by 6AND5)2016 •  NoychoH (talk) 12:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Bernd Bergmann (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2016 •  Bernd Bergmann (talk) 20:01, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Steinsplitter)2016 •  ysjbserver (talk) 07:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Ireas (Eligible, checked by Mh7kJ)2016 •  Ireas (talk) 13:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2016/Votes/Richwales&oldid=15390515"