Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/Elections 2015/Votes/Natuur12

< Stewards | Elections 2015

Natuur12

edit
ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: NL, en-3, de-1
  • Personal info: (English)
    I am Natuur12 and I would like to apply for steward. I registered in 2012 but I became active early 2013. I started contributing at the Dutch Wikipedia and I became active at Commons and other projects later. I became an OTRS-member somewhere in August 2013 and I became a sysop at the Dutch Wikipedia the same year. January the year thereafter I became an admin at Wikimedia Commons and a couple of months later I joined the Dutch Wikipedia's Arbcom.

    I am active in fighting vandalism and I often counter LTA's which are active on several projects plus I like to deal with spambots from time to time. I am good in recognizing patterns in general plus I know how to catch sockpuppets quite well. I easily remember, discover and notice their patterns. I am familiar with IRC and I am a channel operator in several channels.

    Having the steward tools would allow me to do my work faster and more easily plus I will be able to do better follow-ups. I don't use the steward requests at Meta often since I do most requests via the IRC channel #wikimedia-stewards or I ask certain stewards in private. If in doubt or if I don't know how to act I will ask other Stewards for advice first and I am a quick learner.

    I am a male editor who lives in the Netherlands and I am 22 years old. In daily life I'm a student at a university of applied sciences. I'm interested in biology and environmental sciences. I often write about those topics. My native language is Dutch, I can speak English at a decent level and I understand a little bit of German.

    My time zone is +1 or +2 (depends on the time of year) and I can be reached via various talk pages, wikimail and IRC. I'm available via #wikipedia-nl, #wikimedia-stewards, #wikimedia-commons, #wikipedia-en and a few other channels most of the day.

    Thanks for your consideration. Feel free to ask me some questions and I understand, respect and agree with the steward, oversight, checkuser and privacy policy. I hope that I have your trust.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2015/Questions#Natuur12
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

  Yes

edit
  2. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Not afraid to do the right thing when it is just plain unpopular, and he believes that collaboration crosswiki is important. Both are important skills that I think are desperately needed on Wikimedia now. Rschen7754 18:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  highly trusted, crosswiki experienced, etc. Steinsplitter (talk) 18:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Érico Wouters (msg) 18:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. George.Edward.C (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Trusted, good experience, everything anyone could look for in a candidate. George.Edward.C (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Yann (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Yann (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Zivax (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Zivax (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Żyrafał (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Eurodyne (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. EvilFreD (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  EvilFreD (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Sikjes (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2015 •  Sikjes (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I appreciate your contributions. --Uğurkenttalk 18:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Emin • message 18:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Mbch331 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Mbch331 (talk) 18:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Great candidate :) –Davey2010Talk 18:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Jeremy77186 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jeremy77186 (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. NahidSultan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  ~ Nahid Talk 19:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. JurriaanH (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  JurriaanH (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Iooryz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Iooryz (talk) 19:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Semso98 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Semso98 (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Fenikals (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Fenikals (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Legoktm (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Legoktm (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Fork me (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous) •  Fork me (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Saileshpat (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  Saileshpat (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. MartinThoma (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  MartinThoma (talk) 19:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Green Giant (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Considerable experience, bilingual, OTRS and Arbcom experience which helps when dealing with sensitive information. Green Giant (talk) 19:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Tjako (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Tjako (talk) 19:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. De Geo (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Natuur12 has proven to be one of the better moderators on the dutch Wikipedia. The Geo (talk) 19:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Geagea (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  trusted and experienced. Geagea (talk) 20:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Obelix (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rzuwig► 20:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Mirer (talk) 20:45, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Rome2 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rome2 (talk) 20:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Chicbyaccident (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Chicbyaccident (talk) 20:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Jules78120 (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Jules78120 (talk) 21:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Armbrust (talk) 21:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Scooter (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Scooter (talk) 22:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  35. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  PiRSquared17 (talk) 22:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Barras (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Will certainly do well as a steward. -Barras talk 22:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Mazuritz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Mazuritz (talk) 22:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Kolega2357 (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  39. NickK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  NickK (talk) 22:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  40. -revi (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  — Revi 22:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  41. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  DangSunM (talk) 22:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Courcelles 22:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Rax (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Rax (talk) 22:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Yup Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  This person's behavior strikes me as being close to the Dutch stereotype that the Dutch will work with anyone, and the rules are flexible, but even when the rules are bent they must be respected and agreed upon by the parties involved. Blue Rasberry (talk) 00:22, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  46. INeverCry (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  INeverCry 03:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Jusjih (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jusjih (talk) 03:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 03:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Albertus Aditya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Albertus Aditya (talk) 03:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Keshetsven (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  Keshetsven (talk) 04:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  50. !dea4u (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  !dea4u  05:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Inks.LWC (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Inks.LWC (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  52. QEDK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  QEDK (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Enough experience for me. Ajraddatz (talk) 05:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Lymantria (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Lymantria (talk) 06:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Clumsy and stupid (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Clumsy and stupid (talk) 06:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  56. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  57. ArjanH (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  ArjanH (talk) 08:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Stunteltje (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Stunteltje (talk) 08:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  59. 장영재탐험단 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Jangyeongjae Tamheomdan (張榮在探險團) (talk/profile) 08:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  The applicant is qualified Rberchie (talk) 11:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Alexey88 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Alexey88 (talk) 12:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Looks qualified - perhaps a bit insecure now, but that will surely change. Trijnsteltalk 12:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Maestro Ivanković (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Maestro Ivanković (talk) 12:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Caronna (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Caronna (talk) 13:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  65. We hope (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  We hope (talk) 13:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  66. AmaryllisGardener (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  AmaryllisGardener talk 14:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Tufor (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Tufor (talk) 14:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Stemoc (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  not enough cross-wiki experience yet but will surely get there in no time, trusted. Stemoc 17:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Saschaporsche (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Saschaporsche (talk) 18:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  70. The Theosophist (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  The Theosophist (talk) 18:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Miniapolis (talk) 18:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Hannes_24 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  --Hannes 24 (talk) 18:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Nezdek (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Nezdek (talk) 18:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Brimz (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Brimz (talk) 20:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Litlok (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Litlok (talk) 22:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Серега Спартак (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Серега Спартак (talk) 23:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Lisapollison (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  Lisapollison (talk) 07:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Emptywords (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Emptywords (talk) 08:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  78. MoiraMoira (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Hard working, serious, compassionate and helpful. Will use the tools well to benefit the project MoiraMoira (talk) 11:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  79. DirkVE (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  DirkVE (talk) 11:18, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Zeljko (talk) 12:08, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Edoderoo (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  to neutralize the revenge of TBloemink Edoderoo (talk) 12:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Green Zero (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  — Green Zero обг 12:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  83. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Trusted overall and has the experience needed. CT Cooper · talk 14:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Kantatiskiwa (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Kantatiskiwa (talk) 14:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  85. IJA (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  IJA (talk) 15:46, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Hirolovesswords (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Hirolovesswords (talk) 16:37, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Leon saudanha (talk) 16:45, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Polsaker (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Polsaker (talk) 17:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Hanay (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  With pleasure Hanay (talk) 17:48, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Elcobbola (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Эlcobbola talk 00:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Tiptoety (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Tiptoety talk 00:17, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Marcus Cyron (talk) 04:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Az1568 (talk) 06:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Matanya (talk) 08:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Greenday2 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Greenday2 (talk) 08:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Torne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Torne (talk) 10:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Y 6 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Y 6 (talk) 11:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  98. FakirNL (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  can be trusted and will prove himself useful FakirNL (talk) 11:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Talmid3 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Talmid3 (talk) 12:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Joe Watzmo (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Joe Watzmo (talk) 13:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Adriano Morelli (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  I say yes. Adriano Morelli (talk) 13:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Cadfaell (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Cadfaell (talk) 16:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Abaddon1337 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Ok. However, such an insufficient number of spoken languages may be a problem. Abaddon1337 (talk) 16:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Dispe (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Dispe (talk) 22:17, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Savh (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  I believe Natuur to be a capable and trustable user, and am convinced he will be of great assistance as a steward. Savhñ 23:31, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  106. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  GZWDer (talk) 03:30, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  While this candidate has not been involved with Wikimedia projects long, he seems to have handled some issues with other users well in his time here. Wpollard (talk) 04:58, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Fanx (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Fanx (talk) 06:36, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Bybbisch94 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Bybbisch94 (talk) 07:31, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Lanwi1 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Lanwi1(Talk) 11:10, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Ellery (talk) 12:48, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  112. The Herald (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  The Herald 14:10, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Gilgamesh (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  per Geagea Gilgamesh (talk) 20:00, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  114. ברוקולי (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  per geagea. Broccoli • talk page 20:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Nabak (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  This Dutch dude named Natuur12 is accessible, helpful and fair (this is not a covert brown-nosing since he deleted quite a bit of my uploaded images on Commons), last but not least, always positive ... will make a great steward! :) Nabak (talk) 21:15, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  116. NativeForeigner (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  NativeForeigner (talk) 00:13, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Reneman (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  Reneman (talk) 13:03, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Grind24 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Grind24 (talk) 22:42, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Sander1453 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Sander1453 (talk) 22:45, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Assayas (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  Assayas (talk) 08:47, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  120. S.Didam (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  S.Didam (talk) 10:28, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Kehpp (Not eligible, checked by George.Edward.C) •  Kehpp (talk) 11:37, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Ch.Andrew (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  Ch.Andrew (talk) 15:14, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       عثمان منصور انصاري (Not eligible, checked by Southparkfan) •  عثمان منصور انصاري (talk) 16:19, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Begoon (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Begoon (talk) 17:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Matiia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Matiia (talk) 18:57, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Ankry (talk) 19:40, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  125. MannMaus (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  MannMaus (talk) 20:24, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 00:29, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Royalmate1 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Royalmate1 (talk) 00:55, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Aldnonymous (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  I'm confused, I like you, but I never see you do SWMT job.--AldNonBicara? 19:19, 8 February 2015 (UTC) (Changed from Neutral to YES) I am quite happy and satisfied when he agree with me that we should never see culture clash and language barrier as problem, Wikimedia projects will always be multicultural and multilingual, hence many problem caused by it should be a blessing.--AldNonymousBicara? 09:20, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  129. EKMK (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2015 •  EKMK (talk) 11:26, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  130. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  MZaplotnik (contribs) 14:31, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Spartaz (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Spartaz (talk) 19:39, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Heyrubengarcia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Heyrubengarcia (talk) 01:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Taichi (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Taichi - (あ！) 05:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Ldorfman (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Very helpful Ldorfman (talk) 13:05, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Thogo (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I'm not sure what the problem was between you and the other NL wiki users, but you won't be doing steward stuff on NL wiki anyway, so I don't have to care. თოგო (D) 15:39, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  136. FDMS4 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •     FDMS  4    16:34, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Sturmjäger (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Sturmjäger (talk) 19:27, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Der-wuppertaler (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  Der-wuppertaler (talk) 00:26, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Jaredzimmerman (Not eligible, checked by Jianhui67) •  Jaredzimmerman (talk) 05:20, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  138. The powder toy (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  The powder toy (talk) 06:13, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Bff (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Bff (talk) 10:47, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Bpierreb (talk) 12:03, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Wikiklaas (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Wikiklaas (talk) 13:10, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Vituzzu (talk) 18:28, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Dqfn13 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Good collegue, honest and always explains why he does the things he does. Most contact I have with him as collegue sysop is all about getting consensus and explaining each others actions. (except on IRC, that's just chitchat). Dqfn13 (talk) 18:50, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Eman235 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Eman235/talk 20:19, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Technical 13 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  - {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 22:45, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Bawolff (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Bawolff (talk) 00:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Kurykh (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Kurykh (talk) 01:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Argos'Dad (Not eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7) •  Argos'Dad (talk) 03:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Gparyani (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Gparyani (talk) 05:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  149. Hmich176 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Hmich176 (talk) 09:38, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  150. RonnieV (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I think natuur12 will be able to handle this job. I hope he will not lose his attention to the Dutch wikipedia, and Real Life. RonnieV (talk) 17:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Steel1943 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Yes, per above. The "no"s have not convinced me otherwise. Steel1943 (talk) 20:13, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Rcsprinter123 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Rcsprinter123 (talk) 00:49, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Neptuul (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Viel Glück! Neptuul (talk) 08:32, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Chris Troutman (talk) 21:11, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Lemnaminor (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Lemnaminor (talk) 12:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  156. IrwinSantos (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Irwin Dime 14:01, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Tracouti (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Tracouti (talk) 14:20, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Andre S. (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Andre S. (talk) 14:42, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Tremonist (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Tremonist (talk) 14:44, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Teddyyy (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Teddyyy 14:49, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Ronhjones (talk) 21:54, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Benoitlegrand (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Benoitlegrand (talk) 00:04, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  163. 12345danNL (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  12345danNL (talk) 13:22, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Husky (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015 •  Husky (talk) 01:02, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Marcelo Victor (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Mvictor talk 04:08, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Do not follow (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2015 •  Do not follow (talk) 09:19, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Archolman (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Dick (talk) 11:11, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  168. BlueBreezeWiki (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015 •  BlueBreezeWiki (talk) 11:58, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  169. StudiesWorld (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  StudiesWorld (talk) 13:19, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Bk1 168 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Bk1 168 (talk) 14:14, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Krassdaniel (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Krassdaniel (talk) 16:31, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  172. EuroCarGT (Eligible, checked by Vik-Thor)2015 •  ///EuroCarGT 02:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Maleiva (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Maleiva (talk) 05:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  174. 1AnuraagPandey (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Anuraag Pandey (Leave a message) 05:58, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  175. IJzeren Jan (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  IJzeren Jan (talk) 12:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  176. Mailer diablo (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Qualified for the role. Mailer Diablo (talk) 18:14, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  177. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  — X-Javier ✉ [m'écrire] 19:13, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  178. Bigturtle (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Bigturtle (talk) 23:08, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Bever (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Prima, redelijke moderator op NL. Bever (talk) 00:26, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  180. MohandesWiki (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  MohandesWiki Talk 09:20, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Whaledad (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Whaledad (talk) 20:18, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Dinosaurioamarillo (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Dinosaurioamarillo (talk) 02:53, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  183. Wikiwal (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Wikiwal (talk) 10:59, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Helvetius (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Helvetius (talk) 15:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Puffin (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Puffin (talk) 22:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Good afternoon (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015 •  Trusted. Good afternoon (talk) 13:16, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Lixxx235 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  --L235 (talk) enwiki 03:44, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  188. Alan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Alan (talk) 07:05, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  189. GyaroMaguus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Willing to make hard decisions and knows precisely how to make them. —Gyaro–Maguus— 14:10, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  190. MAyo (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  MAyo (talk) 14:12, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  191. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I've gone back and forth on this. While it is true that Natuur12's cross-wiki activity is limited, I still think they would make a fine steward if elected. In my interactions I found the user to be both reasonable and experienced. Snowolf How can I help? 16:58, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  192. Kikuyu3 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015 •  Looks like he will be a wise stew. --Kikuyu3 (talk) 17:55, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. Odder (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •    Oppose The ease with which you have essentially banned a good-faith long term contributor over what was a one-day spat is enough of a reason for me to distrust you with steward access; I don't think you are capable of objectivity when it comes to people you do not like, and it does not bode well for the one job in the Wikimedia community that requires unquestioned neutrality, so thank you, but no. odder (talk) 18:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  While I think the answer to the question I asked (concerning SWMT and similar areas) is satisfactory, overall I am not convinced that Natuur12 has the kind of cross-wiki experience I would like to see in a steward candidate (the activity is mostly concentrated on nlwiki and commons, which of course is in itself not bad). MF-W 18:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Sorry, but it's too soon for me. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       .marc. (Not eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt) •  .marc. (talk) 21:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Fred the Oyster (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Seems to have a problem with neutrality and giving in to peer or group pressure. Fred the Oyster (talk) 23:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  I agree with MF-Warburg. I think you're a good candidate, but I think it would be preferable to have stewards who have been around on Wikimedia projects for a longer period of time with a lot of crosswiki experience (especially since we already have many European ones, including three native Dutch speakers; plus two if you and Taketa are successful). SPQRobin (talk) 00:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Woodshed (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Woodshed (talk) 01:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. EurovisionNim (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Mate, unfortunately I would not really think that you are that reliable. I am very proud of you for fighting vandalism but I do not see much activity. However I think you are a wonderful admin. Please keep up the good work :) EurovisionNim (talk) 05:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. ChristophThomas (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  ChristophThomas (talk) 07:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Not yet. Not crosswiki enough: very few Meta-Wiki contributions, 0.8 inequality score for the wikis contributed. Nemo 08:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Per MF-W & Nemo at present I think. Herby talk thyme 10:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Kggucwa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Kggucwa (talk) 11:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Balko Kabo (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  per Odder Balko (talk) 15:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       FritsHG (Not eligible, checked by Savh) • per Odder FritsHG (talk) 15:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. JurgenNL (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  JurgenNL (talk) 16:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  O.Koslowski (talk) 16:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Mh7kJ (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Agreeing with MF-W and Nemo on this one. Mh7kJ (talk) 17:47, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Mion (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  [1] Incrowd geneuzel = incrowd crap, i suppose Natuur12 means us. Mion (talk) 19:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually, that translation is incorrect. Roughly translated: Too many details only relevant for a small audience. Natuur12 (talk) 19:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Ray Van De Walker (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  I'm uncomfortable that this person has not released their real name to the community. Ray Van De Walker (talk) 20:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Be..anyone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Ban answer, 2012, nlwiki issues, this scares me. –Be..anyone (talk) 01:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  odder hits the nail on the head. FASTILY 05:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Hint000 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Hint000 (talk) 06:22, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. TBloemink (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Not while I am still alive. Distorted mind about certain nlwiki stuff and referring to the RFC while events had taken place even 6 months before is plain wrong and should be associated with incapability to become steward. I have also seen this user do VERY strange stuff on both IRC and with their buttons. This user should not be having any tools at all. Sad, but true. — TBloemink talk 10:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    After the RFC about the harrasment of a certain editor this did not stop. It continued, leadin to me implementing community consensus (conensus was that the both of you would get one last change, and please remember that consensus is not all about votes) and afterwards Tbloemink questioned the way I implemented community consensus and he called for a blockvote but the community confirmed the block. Same goes with the alledged strange stuff on IRC. That was also about protecting the victim against certain behaviour. And believe me, I wish that this all ended 6 months ago but it did no and you are partly to blame for that but since you still play the victim in this I have less hope that you will ever get it. Admintools are just admintools, handy for some maintaince but you do not need them to provide content. Natuur12 (talk) 10:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Natuur12, please note that this does not have anything to do with the RFC. The reason I opposed was already initated 6 months before. The RFC is something I accept and rather even not discuss, which I am kindly asking you now to let it rest. — TBloemink talk 13:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    My bad, that would be the incident where I asked you and some others to stop targetting another collegue and cyberbulying underaged editors. Natuur12 (talk) 14:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Wrong. And to stop the discussion which incident I am referring to; it is the incident in which a group of admins including me were having an odd habit of referring to trains and abbreviations, in which you told me to shut up. And oh, you also banned me from an admin channel. That incident. You know, when the admin channel moved. Also, as you can see, the discussion you are now referring to was properly dealt with. — TBloemink talk 14:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Bladyniec (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Tomasz Bladyniec (talk) 20:32, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Don Cuan (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  Don Cuan (talk) 20:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Steschke (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Ich habe Bedenken. ST ○ 23:01, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Has all the personal qualities I'd want in a Steward, only voting no because of relative cross wiki inexperience. KTo288 (talk) 23:16, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Mykola Swarnyk (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  In some discussions conclusions were made not very accurate. Mykola Swarnyk (talk) 05:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Wiki13 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Based on multiple experiences with the contributor in the past, I do not trust him having steward tools. Wiki13 talk 17:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Kolonel Zeiksnor (Not eligible, checked by Savh) •  This user has quite the track record of invading privacy. Kolonel Zeiksnor (talk) 20:09, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Grest2000 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Grest2000 (talk) 14:32, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Sebleouf (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015 •  Sebleouf (talk) 12:13, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  30. JoshuaKGarner (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  JoshuaKGarner (talk) 19:02, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Ymblanter (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Good candidate, good impressions from Commons, but 2013 as the start of activity is for me too soon. I will likely vote for the candidate in a couple of years. Ymblanter (talk) 19:42, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Nnemo (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Nnemo (talk) 21:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Monopoly31121993 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  It seems multiple users have expressed genuine concern about confirming this user so I think it's best to wait for a broader consensus. Monopoly31121993 (talk) 08:42, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  34. LectriceDuSoir (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Maybe next time LectriceDuSoir (talk) 13:06, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Alexmar983 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  I always prefer to see the positive side of every candidate, but as far as I can read there are some issues and considering you are "young", and we have already enough nl-speaker stewards, I suppose that waiting one more year wouldn't be a problem. WSNT. Alexmar983 (talk) 21:58, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Epìdosis (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Epìdosis (talk) 11:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Per MF-Warburg. Maybe another time. Glaisher (talk) 16:28, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  38. QueenCake (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  I'll prefer to see a little more experience from a steward. QueenCake (talk) 20:38, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Markbassett (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Too ready to block, and needs to bring something else to make positive contributions. Markbassett (talk) 03:25, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  40. ZeaForUs (Verification pending) •  Agree with MF-Warburg. Does not understand basic principles like Feel free and AGF very well.  Klaas|Z4␟V:  08:11, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Lt2818 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Lt2818 (talk) 14:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Trzęsacz (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  He has a problem with the neutrality. --Trzęsacz (talk) 18:08, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  No! Wikit 18:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Vachovec1 (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Stolengood (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •    Oppose Decidedly not. Stolengood (talk) 07:19, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  46. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  John Vandenberg (talk) 11:21, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  47. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  The Banner (talk) 00:38, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Beeswaxcandle (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Beeswaxcandle (talk) 22:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       SEWilco (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf) •  SEWilco (talk) 00:47, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Coekon (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Coekon (talk) 01:42, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Multichill (Eligible, checked by Alexmar983)2015 •  Not now. Multichill (talk) 20:31, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Glewe (Not eligible, checked by Caliburn) •  Glewe (talk) 11:29, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Vdkdaan (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Vdkdaan (talk) 22:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Base (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  While user definitely is experienced, he does not have that great cross-wiki activity. Besides that the dramas user involved himself into are quite worrying. On the one hand being able to act despite hot situation is a good quality but on the other it unavoidably creates people who'd not like that act. I might be one of such. As I see he banned some users who are involved in some global scope dramas (Russavia, JurgenNL) locally in nlwiki. It might be justified but it worries me that when he has ultimate rights globally that actions might spread their scope from local-wide to global-wide and I'd rather avoid that. Base (talk) 00:12, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Conlinp (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Conlinp (talk) 03:12, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Pleclown (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Sorry, but no. Pleclown (talk) 11:34, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Macdonald-ross (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Too early, experience not wide enough, and dramas. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:13, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Aiko (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  We have seen quite a few frustrated actions/operations on nl:Wikipedia. Later, in some 3 years maybe. Grow up first. Aiko (talk) 10:15, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Icarus of old (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015 •  Icarus of old (talk) 17:59, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Trofobi (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Trofobi (talk) 16:18, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Tiller54 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015 •  Tiller54 (talk) 16:26, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Otto ter Haar (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Otto ter Haar (talk) 17:52, 28 February 2015 (UTC) Because of obstructing a proper candidacy for administratorship at the Dutch wikipedia.[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. Mö1997 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Mö1997 (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Rich Farmbrough (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Rich Farmbrough 18:56 8 February 2015 (GMT). 18:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Looks fine, but per MF-W I do not feel ready to support yet. Vogone (talk) 19:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Hampcky (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  I think two year activity is a little time to become steward. Appart from fighting vandalism, a good contributor to Wikipedia needs to create new contents. Hampcky (talk) 20:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  File renaming on more than one Wikiversity is appreciated, but more content contributions please. --Marshallsumter (talk) 22:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Laurent Jerry (talk) 08:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  I do appreciate your work. But you might consider this position as too important. We are just one serving group with some extra buttons and no super-users whose opinion is more worth than others and sets you free from making your own decisions. —DerHexer (Talk) 15:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Southparkfan 18:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Xania (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Not convinced at present regarding some answers to questions and experience. Xania (talk) 20:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Kroji (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015 •  Kroji (talk) 21:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Gilc (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  There are several good points about this user, but the not-so-much experience can't let me vote Yes. Gilc (talk) 04:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Ysjbserver (talk) 11:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Congolandia.g (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Congolandia.g (talk) 21:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Yogesh Khandke (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Yogesh Khandke (talk) 06:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Widr (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Too early. Widr (talk) 11:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Wait for answer. GZWDer (talk) 12:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. 23artashes (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  23artashes (talk) 21:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Romaine (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Per MF-Warburg Romaine (talk) 01:39, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ciell (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  Too early. Ciell (talk) 22:38, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bulldoc (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Bulldoc (talk) 01:53, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  --Berlin-George (talk) 21:52, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Torin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  Torin (talk) 20:27, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Param Mudgal (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Param Mudgal (talk) 12:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Poti Berik (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015 •  Poti Berik (talk) 09:11, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Timk70 question? 23:32, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015 •  Brateevsky (talk) 08:25, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015 •  Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 17:10, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Miniwark (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015 •  Miniwark (talk) 19:53, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Seen some good work, just not sure. Requests in IRC can be a double-edged sword. Somethings should always be recorded.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:55, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  29. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015 •  FeralOink (talk) 07:01, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Avraham (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015 •  Avi (talk) 13:21, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Adirlanz (Not eligible, checked by Eurodyne) •  Adirlanz (talk) 04:16, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Bistropha (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015 •  Bistropha (talk) 08:23, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Zyephyrus (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015 •  per Billinghurst Zyephyrus (talk) 22:19, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2015/Votes/Natuur12&oldid=24961075"