Stewards/Confirm/2016/Teles

< Stewards‎ | Confirm‎ | 2016

TelesEdit

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: pt, en-3, es2
  • Personal info: Hello, everyone. This is going to be my fourth confirmation. I was elected in 2012 and I am still happy to help as a steward. 2015 was an important year for me as I finished my studies on College and started working. That forced me to save a little less time for stewardship. In spite of it, I am glad to help the little I can and would like to continue. Please, feel free to talk about ways of improving my activity as steward. Thanks for participating. Regards.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 14:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[]
italiano:
  • Lingue:
  • Informazioni personali: translation needed
español:
  • Idiomas:
  • Información personal: translation needed
русский:
  • Языки:
  • Личная информация: translation needed
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen:
  • Informationen zur Person: translation needed
português:
  • Línguas: pt, en-3, es-2
  • Informações pessoais: Olá a todos. Esta será minha quarta confirmação. Fui eleito em 2012 e ainda gostaria de ajudar como steward. 2015 foi um ano importante para mim, já que encerrei meus estudos na faculdade e comecei a trabalhar. Isso me forçou a separar um tempo um pouco menor para as atividades de steward. Apesar disso, fico contente em poder ajudar no pouco que possível e gostaria de continuar. Por favor, sinta-se à vontade para falar sobre de que forma eu poderia melhorar minha atividade como steward. Obrigado por participar. Cumprimentos.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 14:32, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[]
Nederlands:
  • Taalvaardigheid:
  • Persoonlijke informatie: translation needed

Comments about TelesEdit

  •   Keep, ok. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep, ok -- Cadfaell (talk) 14:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Ficaê CasteloBrancomsg 15:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Natuur12 (talk) 16:02, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Neutral--6AND5 (talk) 16:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Widr (talk) 16:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep--Vituzzu (talk) 16:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep--BRP ever 17:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Armbrust (talk) 19:30, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Highly active through the entire year and actions were reasonable. --Rschen7754 19:31, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Ajraddatz (talk) 20:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Riley Huntley (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Laberinto16 (talk) 22:29, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Miniapolis 23:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep --Az1568 (talk) 03:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:42, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep No doubt. --Hedwig in Washington (talk) 03:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Skilled and helpful. Please continue. — T. 08:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep--Syum90 (talk) 08:17, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep --Laurent Jerry (talk) 10:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep --Herby talk thyme 12:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Strong keep One of the best few stewards, clueful and helpful. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:07, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep rxy (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep. RadiX 19:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Sufficiently active, valued contributor, no reason to consider removal. -- Avi (talk) 22:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep --Kolega2357 (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Mvictor talk 18:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep --Uğurkenttalk 21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Ficaê. Ativo, amigável, experiente. Obrigado por toda a sua dedicação. Érico (talk) 00:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep --- Darwin Ahoy! 01:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Remove There are cases of serious harassments and stewards do nothing about it. In fact, they are OK with it. --Auvajs (talk) 04:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[]
For instance? I can't take any action when I have no idea what you are talking about.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 04:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Ficaê, trusted and useful user. Alex Pereira falaê 10:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep INeverCry 00:03, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep --Ghilt (talk) 08:55, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Taivo (talk) 14:44, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep. Good work. –Ejs-80 16:53, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep --DCB (talk) 17:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Remove not active enough on meta.--Snaevar (talk) 18:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[]
Though I agree that a part of stewards' work depend on editing Meta, I am pretty sure that a large part of their work can be done without editing here. Actually, it is perfectly possible a hypothetical situation on which the most active steward could be the less active on Meta and, for that, this criteria wouldn't be a good one to measure activity in general. Thanks for participating.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 01:58, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[]
By edits I am referring to number of steward requests answered, but I also looked at the number of actions in the logs. More specifically, I only looked at those logs that correspond to steward request pages that had an bigger backlog in January 2016 than the rest. Edits that do not fall in that sort of criteria I consider trivial and I did not look at those, so I agree with that. The expected number of answers to said requests and actions are based on the activity of other stewards. As such I am saying that the activity on these fronts is lower than with other stewards.--Snaevar (talk) 15:00, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[]
@Snaevar: Thank you for your detailed explanation. Regarding the logs, I don't think I am that bad. We should maintain counters like this old one, which counts log actions and permit a better evaluation. Anyway, I am sad that I wasn't good enough in your opinion, but I'm not sure if removing me and raising a little bit the worload for others stewards is really the best approach. Thanks again for your thoughts.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 03:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[]
I disagree that editing on a specific project should be a criteria for approving a Steward and I don't think you read that in any page related with stewardship. Thanks anyway for your comment.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 01:52, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep Sure. Trijnsteltalk 23:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep--Jusjih (talk) 01:45, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Remove--Muzammil (talk) 08:43, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Keep--Nioger (talk) 11:09, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[]
  •   Remove The problens with this user, in this election, are the same in 2016. JSSX (talk) 20:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[]
The retaliation/answer was fast. JSSX (talk) 21:38, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[]
You just revealed the context of a private conversation, which was oversighted, and used that to insult an user. That was serious enough to use oversight tool. Facing a privacy violation, I had no other option than removing it and supressing per global rules. Trying to set up a situation is pointless on that clearcut case.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[]
Lies. The other user is candidate for Checkuser tools. There is a complaint that candidate revealed personal information of other users on Facebook. This is something that the community of pt.Wiki should know. Your action, Teles, was made after my vote here. And everyone, in pt.Wiki, know that you are friends. I have no more to talk. JSSX (talk) 23:06, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[]
I still defend the idea that a private conversation can't be narrated as that is violating an user's privacy.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[]