Meta:Requests for checkuser/Sotiale

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.


Not ending before 30 October 2020 14:59 (UTC)

Hello, everyone. I would like to request this tool to do my main job better. There are two main reasons for requesting this magnifying glass.

First, I want to help directly with meta-only requests. I promised to help SRCU, and have handled most of SRCUs accordingly(between about 70-80%). Sometimes I met meta-only requests, handing them over to Meta page, I've been thinking that I'd like to help them myself.

Second, because this tool will be of great help to my main job. My main task is tracking and dealing with LTAs or xwiki abuse. Some LTAs/xwiki abusers contribute to meta, pass through meta as well. So this tool will bring me great efficiency and convenience. In particular, I often have to make decisions on my own due to timezone differences. It is obvious that it will be helpful in my work.

I want to help with meta-only requests myself, I need this tool because it gives me efficiency and convenience, but I am well aware that I can only use it when you allow this. Just as you allowed what I do now, I ask for your opinion again. Thank you for your consideration. --Sotiale (talk) 14:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

  1. Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support definitely. Sgd. —Hasley 15:01, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  2. Support Support They already have shown they can be trusted with CU as a steward, and since they're already an admin here this is an entirely reasonable use case. Happy to support. GeneralNotability (talk) 15:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  3. Sure. — regards, Revi 15:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  4. Support Support - Sotiale is one of the most active stewards handling cross-wiki requests, and many of those requests intersect with Meta. He is friendly and helpful, works well with other CheckUsers, and would be a great addition to the team. With the removal of Vituzzu recently for inactivity, it would also be useful to have another Meta CU or two. Thanks for volunteering! – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  5. (Edit conflict.) Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support User shows a high need. Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (CA) 15:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  6. Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support He/she is always helping me/everyone in login-wiki checkuser cases as possible as a steward. I think he/she will also be successful in this permission and will help the other checkusers. Good luck. --Uncitoyentalk 15:22, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  7. Support Support Sure. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 15:51, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  8. Support Support why not. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:11, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  9. Support Support per GeneralNotability and Ajraddatz, no concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 16:15, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  10. Support Support no issues. --IWI (talk) 16:20, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  11. Support Support a need is evident, —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 16:35, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  12. Support Support per Ajraddatz / GeneralNotability / trusted user, valid need --DannyS712 (talk) 17:17, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  13. Yes, please.--MrJaroslavik (talk) 20:05, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  14. Support Support no doubt, per Ajraddatz. Rafael (stanglavine) msg 23:15, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
  15. Support Support --Rschen7754 00:04, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  16. Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support --mirinano (talk) 00:18, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  17. Support Support * Pppery * it has begun 01:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  18. Support SupportTulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 03:09, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  19. Support Support As Sotiale helps zhwiki a lot, I'm sure they will be helpful at Meta too. Meanwhile, I thought stewards automatically have access to Meta CU... --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 03:48, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  20. Support Support no concerns about the candidate, especially if said candidate is a steward and one of the few people who've already gotten the magnifying glass on two other wikis. Also, I agree with Ajraddatz that another one is needed following another loss of CU due to inactivity. ミラP@Miraclepine 04:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  21. Support Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 07:00, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  22. Support Support-𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 07:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  23. Support Support, sure. Trijnsteltalk 09:56, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  24. SupportMarcoAurelio (talk) 10:45, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  25. For sure. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:28, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  26. Support SupportMJLTalk 17:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  27. Support Support Vermont (talk) 20:27, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  28. Support Support. Very active and trusted user. --EVinente (talk) 12:13, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  29. Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support Jianhui67 talkcontribs 13:13, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
  30. Support SupportTeles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 04:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
  31. Symbol strong support vote.svg Strong support -- Несмир Кудилович (разговор) 09:33, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Successful. (31/0/0; 100 %). This RfCU vote passes with unanimous support, and more than the required minimum 25 votes per policy. A request will be posted at Steward requests/Permissions to request that access be granted. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:29, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

The above request page is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Comments about this page should be made in Meta:Babel or Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat.