Stewards/Elections 2015/Votes/Mys 721tx

Mys_721tx (Yishen Miao) edit

ContentsYesNoNeutral
  • Languages: zh-N, en-3
  • Personal info: (English)
    Good day, this is mys_721tx. I joined Wikipedia in 2009 and am an administrator and a checkuser on Chinese Wikipedia. I was in the 2011 election but did not success due to the lack of cross-wiki activity. I subsequently became an Commons admin in the same year, and later an Meta admin the following year. My works on Wikipedia primarily involve center-vandalism on Chinese Wikipedia; I also help with house-keeping on those projects and respond to info-zh and permissions queue in OTRS.

    I fully understand the privacy policy and other policy regarding the steward bit. I would like to aid our current stewards and contribute to global anti-spam and counter-vandalism. This includes revert, blocking/locking spambots, and identifying patterns of spambots via checkuser tools when necessary. I am familiar with many of those measures from pass experience. I would also perform the more "trivial" aspect of steward duty, e.g. respond to various steward request pages on Meta.

    In real life I am a college student, as an result I am constantly away from the keyboard. This makes me inactive on IRC; however, I am reachable by email. If elected, I will make frequent appearance on IRC. I speak Chinese as my native language and am fluent with English.
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2015/Questions#Mys_721tx
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.

  Yes edit

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   right experience with CU and with issues crosswiki. Rschen7754 18:05, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Érico Wouters (msg) 18:09, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. George.Edward.C (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Decent candidate. I felt the answers were slightly unsatisfactory, but still acceptable. George.Edward.C (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Żyrafał (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Żyrafał (talk) 18:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Eurodyne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Eurodyne (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Rich Farmbrough (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Rich Farmbrough 18:55 8 February 2015 (GMT). 18:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Rzuwig 20:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Mirer (talk) 20:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   benefit of the doubt PiRSquared17 (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Kolega2357 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Kolega2357 (talk) 22:30, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Rax (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   "not on IRC" and "Too few contributions to any Wikiversity" are no valid counter ads - IMHO Rax (talk) 22:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Would rather vote on the work than too heavily on the answers (which I agree could have been better), So, support on balance Courcelles 22:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   I also haven't any Wikiversity's edits, why it's also a problem?! Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. GZWDer (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   We must have Chinese-speaking steward if Shizhao can not keep his flag. GZWDer (talk) 01:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15. INeverCry (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   INeverCry 03:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Inks.LWC (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Inks.LWC (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. 老陳 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   老陳 (talk) 05:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Per Rschen7754. Ajraddatz (talk) 05:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. FriedrickMILBarbarossa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   FriedrickMILBarbarossa (talk) 07:36, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Chiefwei (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Chiefwei (talk) 07:49, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Byfserag (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Byfserag (talk) 08:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. E8xE8 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   E8xE8 (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Jacklamf1d14 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   放電の少女 アクセス 09:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Rberchie (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   The applicant is fully qualified Rberchie (talk) 11:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. 333-blue (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015  333-blue 11:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Alexey88 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Alexey88 (talk) 12:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   A bit uncertain, but I think with a little bit of guidance this will end well. Experience with CU and being Asian is a plus for me. Trijnsteltalk 12:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  29. SzMithrandir (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   -- SzMithrandir (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  30. DerHexer (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   —DerHexer (Talk) 16:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Walter Grassroot (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   he is a trustworthy leader. Walter Grassroot (talk) 16:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  32. NahidSultan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   ~ Nahid Talk 18:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Miniapolis (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Nezdek (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Nezdek (talk) 18:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Xania (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   He dealt with the questions he faced well, his language skills are much-needed and I feel he is a trustworthy user Xania (talk) 20:15, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Kilith (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Kilith (talk) 20:32, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Zeljko (talk) 20:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Ray Van De Walker (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Ray Van De Walker (talk) 20:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Серега Спартак (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Серега Спартак (talk) 23:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Be..anyone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   –Be..anyone (talk) 01:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Shizhao (talk) 02:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Fastily (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   FASTILY 05:13, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Aa1388zz (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   符合標準。且根據其以往的經驗能對其有正面幫助。 Aa1388zz (talk) 05:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Hint000 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Hint000 (talk) 06:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Yp8080123 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Yp8080123 (talk) 08:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  46. CT Cooper (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Competent. CT Cooper · talk 14:31, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Kantatiskiwa (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Expérimenté et compétent Kantatiskiwa (talk) 14:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Leon saudanha (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   I have no problem to keep the candidate from exercising the duties of a steward. Good luck and greetings! Leon saudanha (talk) 15:37, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  49. IJA (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   IJA (talk) 15:45, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Steschke (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Man sollte ihm eine Chance geben, sich zu bewähren. ST 22:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  51. JoeenNc (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Yes JoeenNc (talk) 03:47, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Marcus Cyron (talk) 04:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Cwek (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Cwek (talk) 07:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Matanya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Matanya (talk) 08:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Widr (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Already trusted with other hats. No issues with this one. Widr (talk) 08:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Torne (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Torne (talk) 10:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Y 6 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Y 6 (talk) 11:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Aoke1989 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Active and trustworthy. Aoke1989 (talk) 12:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Jon Harald Søby (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Jon Harald Søby (talk) 13:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Yxyang93 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Do better Azunyan(留言) 19:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  61. The powder toy (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   值得信任的用户。 The powder toy (talk) 07:27, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Bybbisch94 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Bybbisch94 (talk) 07:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Wong128hk (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   trustworthy J.Wong 10:26, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Lanwi1 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Lanwi1(Talk) 11:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Ellery (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Ellery (talk) 12:47, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  66. NativeForeigner (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   NativeForeigner (talk) 00:12, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Whaterss (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf)   guy, come on, I trust you. Whaterss (talk) 12:33, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  67. វ័ណថារិទ្ធ (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015   វ័ណថារិទ្ធ (Vantharith) (talk) 09:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Kehpp (Not eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)   Kehpp (talk) 11:42, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Tn4196 (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015   I don't know him, but his situation and answers convinced me. Tn4196 (talk) 11:56, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  69. FeralOink (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015   FeralOink (talk) 15:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Ch.Andrew (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015   Ch.Andrew (talk) 15:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Gakmo (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Gakmo (talk) 17:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Matiia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Matiia (talk) 19:22, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Wagino 20100516 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 00:33, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Royalmate1 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Royalmate1 (talk) 00:54, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Mjesfahani (Not eligible, checked by Savh)   Mjesfahani (talk) 15:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Heyrubengarcia (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Heyrubengarcia (talk) 01:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  76. FDMS4 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015      FDMS  4    16:31, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Lt2818 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Lt2818 (talk) 14:09, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Vachovec1 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Vachovec1 (talk) 18:54, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Kossa b (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Kossa b (talk) 20:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Kurykh (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Kurykh (talk) 01:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Philosopher (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   – Philosopher Let us reason together. 03:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  82. YaganZ (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Good luck! YaganZ (talk) 04:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Aldnonymous (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015  Lately keep seeing this user patrolling Cross Wikis, good work.--AldNonymousBicara? 10:54, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  84. John Vandenberg (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   John Vandenberg (talk) 11:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Gregor Kneussel (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Gregor Kneussel (talk) 12:13, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Xinstalker (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Xinstalker (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Rossi101 (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015   Rossi101 (talk) 20:18, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Chris troutman (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015   Chris Troutman (talk) 21:02, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  89. The Banner (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   The Banner (talk) 00:44, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Tremonist (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015   Tremonist (talk) 14:43, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Benoitlegrand (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Benoitlegrand (talk) 00:03, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       SEWilco (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf)   SEWilco (talk) 00:46, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Hkjacksonhk (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015   Hkjacksonhk (talk) 05:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Caliburn)2015   Brateevsky (talk) 08:24, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Harlock81 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Harlock81 (talk) 13:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Nobs01 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Nobs01 (talk) 23:23, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Bk1 168 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Bk1 168 (talk) 14:12, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  97. EuroCarGT (Eligible, checked by Vik-Thor)2015   ///EuroCarGT 02:10, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  98. FocalPoint (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   FocalPoint (talk) 17:39, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Avraham (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   I believe that Mys 721tx has sufficient cross-wiki activity in multiple languages (Personally, I believe the xwiki index to be misleading for editors with very-high edit counts on their own home wiki and I look for actual number of edits). I also think that the user's answers were satisfactory, and the fact that user is willing to ask more experienced stewards first is important. I do not expect a steward candidate to have given much thought to minimum project size for bureaucrats prior to volunteering for the position, and in a real world case, I expect Mys 721tx to learn quickly and be a positive addition to the current group of stewards. Avi (talk) 23:43, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Maleiva (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Maleiva (talk) 05:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Acalycine (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Sufficient experience with the correct amount of capability, and has handled the questions well. Acalycine (talk) 05:30, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   comfortable with approach and brings LTA and CU experience  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:46, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Mailer diablo (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015   Mailer Diablo (talk) 18:13, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  104. X-Javier (Eligible, checked by Alan)2015   — X-Javier [m'écrire] 19:12, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  105. MohandesWiki (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   MohandesWiki Talk 09:19, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Theodoreianmo2 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Theodoreianmo2 (talk) 11:56, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Dinosaurioamarillo (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Yes, you have my vote. Dinosaurioamarillo (talk) 02:53, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Helvetius (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Helvetius (talk) 15:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  109. GyaroMaguus (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Is experienced with many tools and has good plans. GyaroMaguus 14:04, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  No edit

  1. Vogone (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Unsatisfactory answers. Maybe next time. Vogone (talk) 18:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Steinsplitter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Steinsplitter (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Alan (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Not now Alan (talk) 18:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Davey2010 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Not happy with the answers at all (IMHO they could've and should've been expanded ALOT more!). –Davey2010Talk 18:52, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Fenikals (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)   Fenikals (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sjoerddebruin (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Not on IRC, stewards should be on duty imo. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 19:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Obelix (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Obelix (talk) 20:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Marshallsumter (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Too few contributions to any Wikiversity. --Marshallsumter (talk) 21:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. 분당선M (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   per Vogone. DangSunM (talk) 22:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Woodshed (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Woodshed (talk) 01:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Not yet: no real crosswiki experience, see the other non-supporters and inequality index of 0.88 among contributed wikis. I appreciate the Meta-Wiki activity, which could give a more global perspective, if expanded compared to the rather limited use he made so far of the administrator flag.[1] Nemo 08:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Kggucwa (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Kggucwa (talk) 10:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. AmaryllisGardener (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Your answers to the questions did not satisfy me. AmaryllisGardener talk 14:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. O.Koslowski (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   O.Koslowski (talk) 16:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. The Theosophist (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   The Theosophist (talk) 18:17, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Kroji (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Kroji (talk) 20:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Vonoserbizky Spartacus (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Vonoserbizky Spartacus (talk) 11:18, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Ruthven (talk) 14:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Hirolovesswords (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Hirolovesswords (talk) 16:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Bladyniec (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Tomasz Bladyniec (talk) 20:34, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Congolandia.g (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Congolandia.g (talk) 21:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. SPQRobin (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Per above. SPQRobin (talk) 21:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   KTo288 (talk) 23:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Elcobbola (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Эlcobbola talk 00:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Tiptoety (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Tiptoety talk 00:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Az1568 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Az1568 (talk) 06:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. 23artashes (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   23artashes (talk) 21:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Orzel Bialy (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Don't think I've forgotten what you did to me on 21st March 2014. You wrongly declared that I was User 1abacada and blocked my account. A steward committing such a serious mistake should not be forgiven. Orzel Bialy (talk) 08:39, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Wetrace (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Unsatisfactory answers and performance on controversy. Wetrace (talk) 10:41, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Reneman (Not eligible, checked by Snowolf)   Reneman (talk) 12:57, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Green Zero (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   — Green Zero обг 13:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Grest2000 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Grest2000 (talk) 14:31, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Bulldoc (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Unsatisfactory answers and performance on controversy. Bulldoc (talk) 01:51, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  32. LectriceDuSoir (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015   Maybe next time LectriceDuSoir (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  33. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Southparkfan)2015   Per Nemo's statement above MZaplotnik (contribs) 15:23, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Thogo (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   answers are not satisfying, and working on Commons and Meta is not cross-wiki activity. თოგო (D) 15:29, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Glaisher (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Lack of cross-wiki experience. Glaisher (talk) 16:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  36. QueenCake (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   QueenCake (talk) 20:41, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Yopie (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Yopie (talk) 00:44, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Torin (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Torin (talk) 20:26, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Base (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   User needs to gain some experience. Per above. Base (talk) 01:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Stolengood (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Stolengood (talk) 07:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Param Mudgal (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Param Mudgal (talk) 12:38, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Coekon (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Not satisfed with answers Coekon (talk) 22:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Pavan santhosh.s (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Didn't answered well to the hypothetical question, which is very important in this elections. Pavan santhosh.s (talk) 08:26, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Timk70 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Timk70 question? 23:32, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Baycrest (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Unsatisfactory performance on controversy. One of the most serious vandal in zhwp. Baycrest (talk) 09:25, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Ronhjones (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Ronhjones (talk) 21:52, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Beeswaxcandle (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Beeswaxcandle (talk) 22:46, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       MikeLynch (Not eligible, checked by Openbk)   Thank you for running, but I felt your answers were unsatisfactory, particularly the one involving Checkuser-ing on a relatively new project. Lynch7 00:17, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  48. StudiesWorld (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   StudiesWorld (talk) 13:19, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Smail886 (Not eligible, checked by Openbk)  Smail886 (talk) 13:44, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Conlinp (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Conlinp (talk) 03:10, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Marvin 2009 (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Unsatisfactory performance on controversy in zhwp. Marvin 2009 (talk) 02:51, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Puffin (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Puffin (talk) 22:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Tiller54 (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Tiller54 (talk) 11:27, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  53. MAyo (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   MAyo (talk) 14:11, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral edit

  1. Mö1997 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Mö1997 (talk) 18:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Eminn (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Emin message 18:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Uğurkent (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   --Uğurkenttalk 18:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Jeremy77186 (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Jeremy77186 (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   I am torn. On the one hand, my impression of this candidate has always been good when I encountered him. On the other hand, the crosswiki activity could be higher and I found the answer to my question unsatisfactory (e.g. that his primary concern was about CUing the voters, instead of denying a bureaucrat request on a wiki which obviously is too small for it). MF-W 19:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Fork me (Not eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)   Fork me (talk) 19:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Green Giant (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Per MF-W's question. Any candidate for a trusted group should declare all relevant information even if they think it isn't relevant. Green Giant (talk) 19:33, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Armbrust (talk) 21:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  8. NickK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Mixed opinions, on one hand, it's good to have a steward candidate with a CU flag and some crosswiki experience, on the other hand, answers are not really satisfactory — NickK (talk) 22:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Barras (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Sadly not convinced. -Barras talk 22:47, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Snowolf (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   The answer to the hypothetical question leaves me underwhelmed, for the reasons mentioned by MF-W, however I think their experience across multiple projects and language knowledge would be very helpful to the steward team, so I'm not really convinced either way. Snowolf How can I help? 23:29, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Albertus Aditya (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Albertus Aditya (talk) 03:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  12. !dea4u (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   !dea4u  05:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  13. QEDK (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   QEDK (talk) 05:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Laurent Jerry (talk) 08:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Uncertain I'm afraid Herby talk thyme 11:50, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  16. JurgenNL (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   JurgenNL (talk) 16:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Southparkfan (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Southparkfan 18:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Hannes_24 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   --Hannes 24 (talk) 18:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC) not enough information[reply]
  19. Litlok (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Litlok (talk) 22:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Gilc (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Not sure. Gilc (talk) 04:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Ysjbserver (Eligible, checked by Aldnonymous)2015   Ysjbserver (talk) 11:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Yogesh Khandke (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Yogesh Khandke (talk) 06:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Talmid3 (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Talmid3 (talk) 12:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Adriano Morelli (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Never seen. Never at all... Adriano Morelli (talk) 13:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Abaddon1337 (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Imo, not enough spoken languages. Three should be a minimum. Abaddon1337 (talk) 16:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Once this candidate has more time (he said he was at present a student and has limited time for the computer), I would be happy to vote yes. If you do not get elected, please run again when you have more time. I will vote yes then. Wpollard (talk) 04:50, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. JoshuaKGarner (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   JoshuaKGarner (talk) 18:58, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Berlin-George (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   --Berlin-George (talk) 21:45, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  29. EKMK (Eligible, checked by Vogone)2015   EKMK (talk) 11:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Artregor (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Artregor (talk) 00:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Sturmjäger (Eligible, checked by Openbk)2015   Sturmjäger (talk) 19:27, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Good afternoon (Eligible, checked by George.Edward.C)2015   This user is not very active, but quite trustworthy. Good afternoon (talk) 10:36, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Bpierreb (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Bpierreb (talk) 12:03, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Harsh 2580 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Harsh (talk) 16:57, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Wikit 18:55, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Steel1943 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Read all I could, and I'm on the fence, and probably not moving from it. Steel1943 (talk) 20:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Andre S. (Eligible, checked by Savh)2015   Andre S. (talk) 14:41, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Alarob (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Alarob (talk) 23:55, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Ahmad.aea.99 (Eligible, checked by Vituzzu)2015   Ahmad.aea.99 (talk) 17:10, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
       Glewe (Not eligible, checked by Caliburn)   Glewe (talk) 11:28, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Miniwark (Eligible, checked by Eurodyne)2015   Need a bit more experience. Miniwark (talk) 19:35, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Shanmugamp7 (Eligible, checked by Snowolf)2015   Shanmugamp7 (talk) 06:48, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Bistropha (Eligible, checked by Shanmugamp7)2015   Bistropha (talk) 08:23, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Icarus of old (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2015   Icarus of old (talk) 17:58, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Poti Berik (Eligible, checked by Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt)2015   Poti Berik (talk) 18:14, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]