Stewards/Confirm/2018/Vituzzu

Vituzzu

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Languages: it, scn, en-2, fr-2, la-1, es-1, pt-1
Personal info: I'm always in a hurry but, well, I'm still able to handle a bunch of things which may be useful. I still blame the common lack of resources to solve big problems, some of them have been laying unsolved for years. But also I blame lacking of technical support in some vital aspects of our duties. On the other hand, working on the wp0 abuse case I got in touch with many communities amazingly open to cooperate with us. These efforts to cooperate are way to precious to be wasted in addressing problems which may be effectively addressed in a technical way.

italiano:

Lingue: it, scn, en-2, fr-2, la-1, es-1, pt-1
Informazioni personali: Vado sempre di fretta ma riesco comunque a gestire un po' di cose che dovrebbero essere risultare utili. Me la prendo ancora con la mancanza di risorse che impedisce di risolvere alcuni grossi problemi che giacciono irrisolti da anni. Ma me la prendo anche con la mancanza di supporto tecnico in alcuni aspetti cruciali del nostro ruolo. D'altro canto lavorando sugli abusi via wp0 mi è capitato di entrare in contatto con molte comunità estremamente ben disposte nel cooperare con noi. Questi sforzi di cooperazione sono troppo preziosi per essere sprecati per gestire problemi che potrebbero essere risolti per via tecnica.

español:

Idiomas: it, scn, en-2, fr-2, la-1, es-1, pt-1
Información personal: Siempre tengo prisa pero, bueno, todavía puedo manejar un montón de cosas que pueden ser útiles. Todavía culpo a la falta común de recursos para resolver grandes problemas, algunos de ellos han estado sin resolver durante años. Pero también culpo a la falta de soporte técnico en algunos aspectos vitales de nuestros deberes. Por otro lado, trabajando en el caso de abuso de wp0 me puse en contacto con muchas comunidades increíblemente abiertas a cooperar con nosotros. Estos esfuerzos para cooperar son muy valiosos para ser desperdiciados al abordar problemas que pueden abordarse de manera efectiva de una manera técnica.

русский:

Языки:
Личная информация: translation needed

Deutsch:

Sprachen:
Informationen zur Person: translation needed

Nederlands:

Taalvaardigheid:
Persoonlijke informatie: translation needed

বাংলা:

ভাষা:
ব্যক্তিগত তথ্যাদি: translation needed

Comments about Vituzzu

Keep Active enough and actions were reasonable. --Rs chen 7754 14:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Stïnger （会話） 14:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC).[reply]
Keep --cyrfaw (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 14:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He has done a good job this past year, especially in the combat of cross-wiki spam and the implementation of abuse filters in small wikis. —AlvaroMolina (✉ - ✔) 15:14, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nick (talk) 15:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Artix Kreiger (Message Wall) 15:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — xaosflux ^Talk 16:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 17:01, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep TonyBallioni (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --.av gas 17:47, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Parma1983 (talk) 18:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --*Youngjin (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Linedwell ^[talk] 19:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Wiki13 _talk 20:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very active in responding to long-term and cross-wiki abuse. – Ajraddatz (talk) 20:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Richardkiwi (talk) 21:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep SA 13 Bro (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Obviously.--- Darwin ^Ahoy! 21:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pracchia-78 (talk) 21:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep personally ok. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 22:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Avi (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eurodyne (talk) 01:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- JMGM (talk) 01:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for your efforts on CheckUser! --Marshallsumter (talk) 06:44, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krd 08:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Legoktm (talk) 09:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep MoiraMoira (talk) 10:26, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Robotje (talk) 10:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because of the heavily oversubscribed talk page. --Green Giant (talk) 11:05, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Bukhari (Talk!) 12:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Apoio Thanks for your efforts. Alex Pereira ^falaê 13:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Holder (talk) 15:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Luke 081515 20:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Experienced and sound steward. Does a wonderful work. RadiX ∞ 01:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Yeza (talk) 06:29, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Krinkle (talk) 06:36, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Civvì (talk) 16:53, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep very active, almost always around. ~ Nahid ^Talk 19:03, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep keep on working --Elmie (talk) 19:17, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Reasonable actions, active enough. — regards, Revi 19:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Rzuwig^► 20:23, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. --Euphydryas (msg) 21:32, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A tireless worker. --Ruthven (talk) 10:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --İncelemeelemani (talk) 10:38, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Guidomac (talk) 12:11, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Soul Train (talk) 12:38, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
~~Remove~~ I sent him an important message. He didn't help me, so I don't trust him.--Kingbjelica (talk) 12:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry but I receive lots of messages, though you should had read the notice at the beginning of my talkpage, suggesting to use SRP for similar issues. I think I was about to answer you some days after, but I saw Hakan already did. --Vituzzu (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Most VPN IP's are disabled by you. I think a reason enough to answer the messages. But Hakan confirmed your busyness with this message.--Kingbjelica (talk) 13:40, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I try, but sometimes it's hard to guarantee. I started working on a template to be shown/linked for such blocks. --Vituzzu (talk) 20:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep --Aplasia (talk) 13:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Eumolpo (πῶς λέγεις; = che vuoi dire?) 15:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep —DoRD talk 15:40, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Carlsrator (talk) 20:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Remove look to the other remove signs above. Theses things are a NO GO!--Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 02:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's almost as if any 'remove' rationale whatsoever by another editor counts as a 'no go' in your opinion. Lepricavark (talk) 15:53, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Bestoernesto: Warum lehnst du für jeden Grund gemacht ab? --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 13:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 04:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Burada Vituzzu haqsızlıq edib. Yenidən baxılmasını tələb edirəm. Səsvermədə 19 dəstək, sadəcə 1 əleyhinə səs olub. Vituzzunun Not done etməsinin heç bir əsası yoxdur. Mənim vikikitabda əvvəlki idarəçilik fəaliyyətim dövründə heç bir problem yaşanmamışdır. Həmçinin onun lokal vikilayihələrin - məsələn, AzVikinin işinə müdaxiləsi qaydaları pozan istifadəçilərin onun tərəfindən müdafiəsi isə nəticələnmişdir. Son bir ildəki fəaliyyətini nəzərə alaraq, Vituzzunun stüard kimi qalmasının tam əleyhinəyəm. --►Cekli 829 06:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Salutamu! Se non ci fosse Vituzzi bisognerebbe inventarlo (i.e. "If there were no Vituzzu he should be invented"). - εΔ ω 08:23, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Keep --Joalpe (talk) 12:15, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, we need one more year of high activity of such quality — NickK (talk) 18:50, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Kein Einstein (talk) 21:57, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I just quote AlvaroMolina --Lucas (talk) 16:11, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Taivo (talk) 12:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Grüße vom Sänger ♫^(Reden) 17:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good experience--Ymblanter (talk) 20:54, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep–Ammarpad (talk) 00:12, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 10:04, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --V4venture (talk) 14:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Umberto NURS (msg) 14:17, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Zyephyrus (talk) 15:16, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep StevenJ81 (talk) 21:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Alaa :)..! 06:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ghilt (talk) 17:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Remove As per User:Donald Trung. + On my humble opinion, Vituzzu is sometimes biased. --Kusurija (talk) 21:56, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, definitely. --Vachovec1 (talk) 01:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Vituzzu is biased steward, who is not able to show proffesional NPOV attitude, he is not able to recognize good from bad and thus as a steward he rather demage users and projects than help. Moreover I can see, that he has lots of blocks and lots of people calling him, not understanding, why they are blocked. At the same time, his respones are late. At this time, when Wikipedia is less and less attractive, we need to work with every new contributor generously and be able to forgive. Vituzzu's approach is completly different and thus he may cause we lose potetial contributors.--Juandev (talk) 21:27, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In your dictionary "biased" means "someone who doesn't take my side in my personal wars against Czech users". Obviously the "good" it's you, while the "bad" are your ancient enemies. Kusurija is already here, I'm waiting for Auvajs then. Are you ok if I'll pre-load your "remove" at the beginning of any yearly confirm? An "he's biased" for you and Kusurija and a "he supports harassment" for Auvajs. --Vituzzu (talk) 11:54, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is you have accused a user from breaking wikimedia policies without any prove; based on notice of the user, who is in the community known for notorious lieing. And you continue with this unprofessional behavior as seen above in the comment.--Juandev (talk) 07:08, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 07:34, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Sloppy global ip blockings with tons of collateral damage —MBq (talk) 08:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about this vote follows.

@MBq: actually the two blocks you're referring to are perfectly legit, I suspect the users (who was being already helped by fellow stewards) you meant to help is forgetting to say they're using some VPN or, even worse, they are not aware of some malware on their PC. I don't like spending much time in finding potential or proven open proxies but is something which must be done in order to address stuffs like this. --Vituzzu (talk) 11:36, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I understand you're tediously fighting global vandalism, and I certainly do appreciate your commitment. Alas, I've seen at least three complaints of guileless de.wp users being affected by your range blocks: [1], [2],[3] (german, sorry). I believe there might be an unknown number of other users who don't know where and how to complain, and simply stop contributing. - ~~Also, I consider your standard blocking reason "leaky colon" inappropiate.~~ Greetings, --MBq (talk) 12:13, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@MBq: mediawiki interface makes it easy to reach me even by email (as you can see my email is publicly listed at my userpage). These three cases cannot be compared: one was an user editing from a VPS: users consiously editing from VPS or VPN can perfectly understand the situation they are caught into. Setting up a private VPS is a non-trivial action. What can be really troublesome are two kind of circumstances: users with a weird network configuration (e.g. people editing from some "hyperlan" provider or some offices) and users with some malware on their own PCs. Ringing a bell to the latter is not that bad, honestly they should be more worried of someone stealing their credit cards rather than my blocks. For people with "weird" network configuration we all try to do our best to address their problems, though mediawiki doesn't help us. Finally the block reason is not leaky colon but leaky colo. Colo is a common abbreviation for "colocation service/facility/provider", though a couple of years ago I was pointed out this jargoon can sound obscure so I'm currently using "hosting service/provider with open proxies" and similar things. --Vituzzu (talk) 13:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

colo/n: my apologies, didn‘t know that, thank you for clearing it up. As to the network oddities: true. And Mediawiki doesn’t faciliate things: true as well. Nevertheless I‘d like to maintain my opinion that you’ve induced too much collateral blockings. Perhaps you could use shorter blocks and smaller ranges. —MBq (talk) 16:13, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@MBq: I don't want to change your opinion I just found something truly imprecise worth clarifying. Lengths are chosen to be less than the time the cause of a block is supposed to last: colocation facility network assignments almost never change, while botnets over residential xDSL connections are blocked for some weeks. It must be clear there's almost no possibility for an unaware user to be able to reach Wikipedia only from one of these blocked ranges, still they can edit meta. Finally the ranges are chosen via a similar criterion: blocking a range which has a coherent assignment: for example if an ISP offers transit, housing and residential access only the second network will be blocked, while the first one may be blocked on a case by case basis, but the first two networks will be blocked together. We found OVH mixes the latter two kinds of services so we're currently avoid blocking OVH, though this creates lots of extra spam attacks. Apart from open proxies collections (lists) handling these stuffs is not cheap in terms of "studying" the best solution, notwithstanding this I try to carefully consider any rangeblock I issue. --Vituzzu (talk) 18:30, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

“I try to carefully consider...“ - that’s all I‘m asking for. Thanks again for considering my case and for the given insights in your work. Objection withdrawn —MBq (talk) 19:53, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep odder (talk) 10:17, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Lepricavark (talk) 15:53, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Udo T. (talk) 12:53, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --GZWDer (talk) 19:00, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Remove --Methodios (talk) 13:59, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
keep -Barras talk 16:12, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Armbrust (talk) 16:24, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Ganímedes (talk) 22:20, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active steward. Helpful for blocking an Open Proxies.--rxy (talk) 01:56, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Pyprilescu (talk) 11:07, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Remove--Rufet Turkmen | ^talk 11:16, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, does great essential and underappreciated actions, including those with regard to leaking hosts. Sa vh ^ñ 12:04, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Kartoffeln —DerHexer (Talk) 10:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Active user, appears to be active in stopping spam etc. --Sau226 (talk) 13:32, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --mikeu ^talk 15:31, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Sîmbotin (talk) 06:54, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Iva (talk) 20:49, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Defender (talk) 20:53, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Platonides (talk) 23:10, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Natuur12 (talk) 23:45, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 16:44, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Matanya (talk) 10:19, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --masti <talk> 13:33, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]