Steward requests/Global permissions

< Steward requests(Redirected from SRGS)
Requests and proposals Steward requests (Global permissions) latest archive
This page hosts requests for global permissions. To make a request, read the relevant policy (global rollback, global sysop, global rename, …) and make a request below. Explain why membership is needed for that group, and detail prior experience or qualifications.

This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.

Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).

Quick navigation: Global rollback | Global sysop | Global rename | Global IP block exemption | Other global rights | Removal of access | Local permissions | Unexpired temporary access

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests for global rollback permissionsEdit

  Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global rollback policy.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have sufficient activity to meet the requirements to be allocated the global rollback flag
  2. You have a global account;
  3. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable.
=== Global rollback for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = Username
}}
::''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+5 days}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than 5 days (other than requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, no other exceptions are allowed, no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Global rollback for TelesEdit

Hi, folks! I am a former global rollbacker/sysop and had the flags removed when I became a Steward back in 2012. Day by day, I am returning from a partial wikibreak and wouldn’t ask for this permission, but I recently got to know about the swviewer and just find that amazing. I am using it on my mobile combining with IRC patrolling. It’s my new favorite pastime. It requires rollbacker access to work better, so I feel like I would benefit from that. Thanks in advance! Be safe!—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:53, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Not ending before 19 September 2020 22:53 UTC
  •   Support of course. Happy to see you back :) Rafael (stanglavine) msg 22:59, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Strong support Very trusted and long experienced user. Best wishes. --Superpes15 (talk) 23:00, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support LGTM, trusted user --DannyS712 (talk) 23:01, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Trusted user. Isabelle 🔔 23:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   SupportAjraddatz (talk) 23:16, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support of course! Have fun with SWViewer too, it sure is amazing. Vermont (talk) 23:19, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support obviously :) --IWI (talk) 23:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 00:10, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support with much happiness   --TheSandDoctor Talk 02:28, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support--Kiran Gopi (talk) 02:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support · Sure, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Welcome back -J. Ansari Talk 05:12, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support —-mirinano (talk) 08:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support No problem for me. --Wiki13 (talk) 08:10, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 08:11, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Minorax (talk) 08:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support, sure. Cheers! Nadzik (talk) 08:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support ‐‐1997kB (talk) 09:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Trusted user. Welcome back :) --Uncitoyentalk 11:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • {{Oppose}} There's no reference for your Commitment. Rollback is revert all edits made by last author, which is only use for prevent vandalism. Bill Cipher, Stan, Twins, Dipper - Gravity falls and J.Smile 13:02, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
    • J. Smile, it is an accurate statement that rollback is used to revert vandalism. What do you mean by "There's no reference for your Commitment" and how does it correlate to an argument for opposing Teles? Vermont (talk) 13:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

I can't explain for that, so my opinion is canceled. Bill Cipher, Stan, Twins, Dipper - Gravity falls and J.Smile 13:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

  •   Support. Sgd. —Hasley 14:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support :D --Sotiale (talk) 14:38, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Support, happy to have you back. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 16:06, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support--Infinite0694 (Talk) 12:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -FASTILY 00:46, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Alaa :)..! 09:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support, trusted user. Meiræ 15:43, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support - definitely, they should have the rights back, thanks for the return. QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 16:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support, sure! --Wright Streetdeck 11:33, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

  Done Clear consensus. Welcome back. --Sotiale (talk) 23:05, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Requests for global sysop permissionsEdit

  Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global sysops policy.
Stewards
When you give someone global sysop rights, please list them on Users with global sysop access and ask them to subscribe to the global sysops mailing list.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).
=== Global sysop for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = Username
}}
:''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+2 week}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential. Please note: Since 2019 all global sysops are required to have two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled.

Requests for global rename permissionsEdit

  Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the global rename policy and the global renamers policy page.
Stewards
When you give someone global rename rights, please add them to the list of global renamers and ask them to subscribe to the global renamers' mailing list.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
  3. You have considered the addition of a user language box to your user page
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).
=== Global rename for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = meta.wikimedia <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = Username
}}
:''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+2 week}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Global rename for AEdit

Not ending before 20 September 2020 20:47 UTC

Hi everyone, I'm A from Vietnamese Wikipedia. I'd like to help out the global and local renaming processing by requesting for the global renamer right. I am an OTRS member as well as an eliminator on the Vietnamese Wikipedia, a user group that does not exist in many Wikipedias but has the right to make certain admin actions. The main reason I am requesting this right is because there's currently a lack of global renamers on vi.wiki, since both global renamers are busy with their personal lives and are currently on Wikibreak. There're currently some requests that have not been approved for weeks. With this right, I would help reduce the local and global rename backlog. Thank you very much for your time and consideration! -- talk 20:47, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

  •   Weak support, there clearly is a need for these permissions. Cheers! Nadzik (talk) 07:16, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support A is an active eliminator in our project (viwiki). Alphama (talk) 21:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Несмир Кудилович (разговор) 23:49, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 03:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Weak support It is eliminator (such as half-admin) on the Vietnamese Wikipedia. I couldn’t see its actions for usernames rules from its contributions and logs (maybe I'm misunderstanding this because I don't speak Vietnamese, I would be glad if you tell the truth with your arguments). But it is obvious that knows the Vietnamese Wikipedia. Maybe it can help username processes. --Uncitoyentalk 14:15, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -FASTILY 01:04, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Sure, Viwiki receives alot of requests and I think there should be local renamers who can effectively deal with them and candidate is trusted on their homewiki. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 02:57, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support--Mtarch11 (talk) 11:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Now viwiki has only one active local renamer (Tran Nguyen Minh Huy), another (Phjtieudoc) maybe inactive. We need more local renamers. Conbo (talk) 19:48, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --mirinano (talk) 05:36, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ap7189ap (talk) 13:29, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Superpes15 (talk) 17:46, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support seems trusted, no objections. Rafael (stanglavine) msg 18:44, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 18:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   SupportAjraddatz (talk) 20:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support I see no reason to oppose and generally believe that the more renamers we have the better. --TheSandDoctor Talk 20:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support No problem for me. --Wiki13 (talk) 20:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Ok Autumn VN (talk) 05:09, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Geonuch (talk) 11:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Strong support Global renamers are necessary. The two global renamers remain in Vietnamese Wikipedia are unactive now. We need more global renamers to help other users change their name. A is an active member so I have no reason to oppose her. This guy opposed her for unrelated reason was so lame. :) DreamSeeeeker (talk) 00:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Strong oppose Following reason will make me oppose this (Lý do để bỏ phiếu chống):
    1. Thỏa hiệp trong với các thành viên dịch máy - Ignore for members abuse machine transltaion (như [1]. Đáng ra cái đó phải bỏ biển xóa nhanh hoặc clk để xóa luôn, chứ cứ để đó thì thành ra là để biên wiki thành cái đống rác??)
    2. Một số bài viết rồi để đó, như [2] hay [3] (Some article write like "write to have")
    3. Uncessary permissions. --Bill Cipher, Stan, Twins, Dipper - Gravity falls and J.Smile 12:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
    Translation: J.Smile seems to use somewhat broken English, so I will rephrase their points:
    1. They claim that A ignores the abusing of content translation tool on viwiki, which leads to the existing of many bad quality translated articles from enwiki (or more correctly, they claims that A doesn't make any action about this, aside from reverting their speedy deletion template. The real quality of such articles is another story). They also claim that A "make compromise" with users creating such articles, which has no basis I think.
    2. They point out that A has created some stub articles without further improving them, he means "viết rồi để đó" or "viết cho có", in Vietnamese this means something likes "write just for show".
    3. May be they should use singular form here, not plural form like this. MeigyokuThmn (talk) 02:00, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
    @J. Smile (Love & V.A.V.I): I've been thinking about what you said for a while but unfortunately it didn't help as I still don't understand what the reasons you mentioned have to do with Global Renamer. But anyway, even if your stated reasons don't make any sense (at least in this context), I'll still do my best to explain the circumstances with you and everyone here:
    1. Okay, this is probably about the use of Content Translation tool in the article "Công nghiệp nhựa". First, you added the "speedy deletion" template to this article with the reason "Machine Translation". I've removed and replaced it with the "rough translation" template. As I mentioned in the edit summary, "machine translation" is not a valid CSD criterion. Vi.wikipedia has a committee in which the quality of the translation can be checked. If the community is of the opinion that the quality of the article is too poor to be rescue at all, it can be deleted immediately. You should have requested a review here instead of requesting a SD. In my opinion, apart from a few minor translation errors, the article wasn't that bad. Please remember: Rude or speedy deletions of articles drive away editors, especially newbies!
    2. May I ask you one question: Have you even checked the corresponding articles on en.wiki from which these two were translated? Probably not, so here: Marcus (son of Basiliscus), Teia, version of 12 September 2017. I translated everything that were in the en.wikipedia's versions of these two articles, not just "viết cho có" as you claimed.
    3. Sorry again, but I don't understand what you mean by "unnecessary"? There are tons of requests that haven't been approved in weeks. I think everyone here should known how urgent the situation is and whether or not it is "necessary" to vote for me? Btw: I also see that you are voting against in almost every major requests here, I wonder what you are trying to achieve with that. -- talk 20:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
    @J. Smile (Love & V.A.V.I): I'll be very glad if you could answer my questions. Many thanks in advance. ;) talk 11:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Viwiki is always in the state of lacking active maintainers. So we need more people. MeigyokuThmn (talk) 04:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Ủng hộ một nửa Chưa thấy bạn hoạt động nhiều trong công tác hỗ trợ đổi tên. Năng lực trong việc nhận dạng các tên sai quy định vẫn còn là một dấu chấm hỏi. Tuy nhiên, với kinh nghiệm thu được từ nhiều dự án lớn nhỏ, tôi tin bạn có thể xử lý tốt công việc. Chúc đề cử thành công. Nguyenhai314 (talk) 04:59, 16 tháng 9 năm 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support--Infinite0694 (Talk) 12:19, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support. Meiræ 15:54, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support. Sgd. —Hasley 16:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Weak support, per above. --Wright Streetdeck 11:33, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Alaa :)..! 15:21, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Global rename for AlphamaEdit

Not ending before 21 September 2020 21:32 UTC

I am a sysop of Vietnamese Wikipedia. In our project (viwiki), we receive the rename requests every week [4] but seem that only 1997kB works on it. Therefore, I request this right for a local admin to solve the rename requests more efficiently. Alphama (talk) 21:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

  •   Support I think you understand the rules as admin from the logs (blocking the some inappropriate username) and contributions. It can facilitate renamer processes with the languages that it understands. --Uncitoyentalk 14:15, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Sure, Viwiki receives alot of requests and I think there should be local renamers who can effectively deal with them and candidate is trusted on their homewiki. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 02:56, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 16:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support--Mtarch11 (talk) 11:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Experienced sysop in vi.wiki Conbo (talk) 19:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --mirinano (talk) 05:36, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support sure. Cheers! Nadzik (talk) 09:08, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support--evrifaessa ❯❯❯ talk 11:02, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   SupportAmmarpad (talk) 11:56, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Несмир Кудилович (разговор) 05:37, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Ap7189ap (talk) 13:30, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Superpes15 (talk) 17:46, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:21, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Trusted, viwiki have a constant demand, no objections. Rafael (stanglavine) msg 18:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 18:53, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   SupportAjraddatz (talk) 20:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support No concerns. --TheSandDoctor Talk 20:57, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support -FASTILY 00:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Geonuch (talk) 11:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Strong support This user is a really active member in Vietnamese Wikipedia. I have no reason to oppose him. DreamSeeeeker (talk) 00:25, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose There's unnecessary for you for that permission right now. Rename there's too many other people can do, you only need sysops is enough (bạn không cần phải có quyền này đâu, bản chỉ cần công việc của BQV là đủ rồi.) Bill Cipher, Stan, Twins, Dipper - Gravity falls and J.Smile 12:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
    @J. Smile (Love & V.A.V.I): What 's wrong with you, sir? Vietnamese Wikipedia is lack of global renamers (because the two global renamers in Vietnamese Wikipedia are unactive) and you still say that we don't need them anymore? How funny it is! DreamSeeeeker (talk) 00:31, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
    I prefer for use oppose rather than support. And this permission should not give for too many people. Bill Cipher, Stan, Twins, Dipper - Gravity falls and J.Smile 05:43, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Ủng hộ Thành viên là bảo quản viên. Có kinh nghiệm tiếp xúc nhiều dạng tên không phù hợp nên rất hữu ích với quyền này. Ngoài ra xem xét tình hình nhân lực hiện nay, bổ sung thêm một vài thành viên địa phương có khả năng đổi tên sẽ giảm tải lượng công việc rất lớn cho các thành viên khác. Nguyenhai314 (talk) 04:53, 16 tháng 9 năm 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support for the same reason as my vote for "A" above. Alphama is also a very active sysop on viwiki. MeigyokuThmn (talk) 10:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support--Infinite0694 (Talk) 12:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support. Meiræ 15:57, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support. Sgd. —Hasley 16:15, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support. --Wright Streetdeck 11:33, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --Alaa :)..! 15:21, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support --BRP ever 08:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Requests for global IP block exemptionEdit

  Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions. Please review Global IP block exemption. You may request Global IP block exemption via stewards wikimedia.org if you can not edit this page.
Please note: Global IP block exemption does NOT make one immune to locally-created blocks of any sort, only global blocks.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting global IP block exemption, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To request global IP block exemption
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why you need the access and why you're suitable. If needed, link to relevant discussions.
=== Global IP block exempt for [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}}
 |discussion=
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if there is demonstrated need for the permission, such as bypassing a global block from someone who is not the intended target.

ADD Global IP block exempt for Marek TorbaEdit

Hi, I would like to ask for an IP block exemption for the abovementioned user. As noted on his pl.wiki userpage, this is a staffer of a Polish museum (Wawel Royal Castle in Cracow), taking a part in the most recent GLAM partnership of Wikimedia Polska. The global IP block removal is vital for e.g. Commons work and upload. On behalf of the WMPL, aegis maelstrom δ 19:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

  Done masti <talk> 20:38, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for FunkierWheatEdit

I'm a Wikipedia editor from mainland China. I have to use a proxy, so I need an IPBE, thanks, --岁月静好 FunkierWheat 13:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

@FunkierWheat: If you want to edit on zhwiki, please request IPBE first on zhwiki. --Sotiale (talk) 12:21, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
@Sotiale: Hmmm I want to edit on not only zhwiki, but enwiki and zh-classical wiki. What should I do? --岁月静好 FunkierWheat 12:49, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for ShiizhangEdit

I'm from mainland of China, where Wikipedia is overall blocked by GFW since 2019. I edited some articles of interest to me on the zh-wiki with a http proxy, same as the wikidata. The IP address of my proxy was blocked. The block ID is #285326. Hence, I would like to apply for global IP block exemption, thanks, --Shiizhang (talk) 12:29, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Done. --Sotiale (talk) 12:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for User:MasaneMiyaPAEdit

I'm from mainland of China and I already have the IPBE in ZH Wikipedia but excluding wikimedia,this made a great difficult while batch uploading photos ,I would like to apply for global IP block exemption. thanks, --MasaneMiyaPA (talk) 04:57, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

  Done Ruslik (talk) 11:16, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissionsEdit

  Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting 2FA tester global permissions, make sure that:

  1. You are logged in on this wiki;
  2. You have read Help page about the two factor authentication;
To request additional global permissions
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and INDICATE you have read the Help page.
=== 2FA Tester for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = Username
 |discussion=
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if there is no reason not to grant one. A steward will review the request.

2FA Tester for vicsarEdit

<Hi, thanks for your help volunteers! I would like to secure my account with 2 factor authentication, I have read the help file and have experience using this sort of technology since 2012 (started with Google.com).>, Thank you. --vicsar (talk) 23:00, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

  Done-BRP ever 08:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

2FA Tester for lucidforestEdit

I would like to opt-in to 2 factor testing. I'm a fan of security.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by lucidforest (talk)

(Non-steward question) @Lucidforest: Did you read Special:MyLanguage/H:2FA? Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (CA) 08:00, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Requests for other global permissionsEdit

  Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting additional global permissions, make sure that:

  1. You are logged in on this wiki;
  2. No specific section on this page exists for the permission you want to request;
To request additional global permissions
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain what kind of access you need and why. If needed, link to relevant discussions. If you hold, or have previously held, the right and are asking for either a renewal or revival of that right, please add a link to the previous discussion.
=== <Add requested permission here> for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = Username
 |discussion=
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a short period of consideration. A steward will review the request.

See alsoEdit