Steward requests/Global permissions

< Steward requests(Redirected from SRIPBE)
Requests and proposals Steward requests (Global permissions) latest archive
Shortcut:
SRGP
This page hosts requests for global permissions. To make a request, read the relevant policy (global rollback, global sysop, global rename, …) and make a request below. Explain why membership is needed for that group, and detail prior experience or qualifications.

This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.

Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).

Quick navigation: Global rollback | Global sysop | Global rename | Global IP block exemption | Other global rights | Removal of access | Local permissions | Unexpired temporary access

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests for global rollback permissionsEdit

  Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global rollback policy.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have sufficient activity to meet the requirements to be allocated the global rollback flag
  2. You have a global account;
  3. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable.
=== Global rollback for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = Username
}}
::''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+5 days}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than 5 days (other than requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, no other exceptions are allowed, no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Global rollback for -akkoEdit

Not ending before 26 February 2021 01:10 UTC

I have used SWViewer to do SWMT work for a long time (even though I didn't join it), I want to get this tool so that I can better continue to complete the anti-vandalism work. Thank you. (`・ω・´) (talk) 01:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

  •   Support Reverts look good. I don't see why not. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support I see you trying to deal with small wikis/cross-wiki for a long time. I didn't see much of a problem in your edits. I think akko can be a global rollbacker according to these. --Uncitoyentalk 07:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --Saroj Uprety (talk) 08:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Okay enough. Thanks for volunteering. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Just my 2c: Be careful patrolling a wiki where you don't know the language. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support No concerns. --ZabeMath (talk) 11:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support, sure. Sgd. —Hasley 11:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Yes. —-mirinano (talk) 12:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --Irwin talk2me 13:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --Geonuch (talk) 14:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --20041027 tatsu (talk) 16:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support dwf² 07:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support seems good. --IWI (talk) 08:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support no concerns.-BRP ever 08:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 20:15, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   SupportTeles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 02:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support, I don't see any problems. -- CptViraj (talk) 09:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support--May♡♡→♡℃Talk 14:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support No concerns. --Wiki13 (talk) 14:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks good. — csc-1 20:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --Superpes15 (talk) 06:38, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Minoraxtalk 03:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support--Mtarch11 (talk) 04:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Global rollback for Karam06Edit

The following request is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hello, I have removed vandalism from many pages on wiki and this work is still going on, as long as vandalism is done from only one edit it can be easily undo / Revert but when one page But vandalism from more than one property cannot be undone, for that the page has to be edited by itself. Which takes too much time to do. So you are requested to give me the role of Golbal rollbacker so that it can be easier. Please first of all.I' m Rollback on Hindi Wikipedia.[1] Then you myConsider me bare. I am Members of Small Wiki Montering Team and Use swviewers to Revertes Vandalism. Thanks and Best Regards.Karam06 (talk) 13:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

  •   Oppose unfortunately. Bad edit matrix (that is, lack of experience reverting on multiple wikis), plus unexplained block (sockpuppetry?) on Wikidata. Leaderboard (talk) 13:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Strong oppose Absolutely not. This tone-deaf request aside, the user is blocked on Wikidata for socking and lacks any experience. I suspect there's also some xwiki sockpuppetry as well. Praxidicae (talk) 14:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose due to the socking block on WD, which (in my book) is a quick fail for advanced rights. JavaHurricane 14:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose. A block that has been left unexplained here is a big red flag for me. So no. --Wiki13 (talk) 14:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per above comments. --Uncitoyentalk 15:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Strong oppose per unexplained sockpuppetry block. — csc-1 20:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Oppose only edited on 5 wikis, all of which have local non-admins groups that include rollback rights. Little crosswiki experience, plus the block on wikidata. --DannyS712 (talk) 00:55, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

  Not done: unlikely to pass under any circumstances at this point in time. Sorry. --Defender (talk) 01:12, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Requests for global sysop permissionsEdit

  Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global sysops policy.
Stewards
When you give someone global sysop rights, please list them on Users with global sysop access and ask them to subscribe to the global sysops mailing list.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).
=== Global sysop for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = Username
}}
:''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+2 week}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential. Please note: Since 2019 all global sysops are required to have two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled.

Global sysop for SavhEdit

Not ending before 5 March 2021 22:36 UTC

Hi, I'd like to re-apply to the Global Sysop group. I previously was one from July 2011 onwards, nearly ten years ago. I was later elected steward in 2014, and resigned from that position in 2017. The last couple of months I have been quite active again as a part of the SWMT (now using SWViewer), and I think having access to the Global Sysop toolset would be beneficial to intervene in certain situations without the need to call on others for deletions and blocks. As mentioned in my past requests, I'm bilingual Dutch & Spanish, and understand a few other Latin and Germanic languages. Aside from my global activities, I'm a sysop on the Spanish Wikipedia and on the Spanish Wikibooks. Savhñ 22:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

  •   Support No concerns. --ZabeMath (talk) 22:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support No concerns. DARIO SEVERI (talk) 04:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Welcome back! Jianhui67 talkcontribs 05:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Sure! --Superpes15 (talk) 05:56, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --Rschen7754 05:58, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support -- - FitIndia Talk Admin on Commons 05:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support, yes please. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 06:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support, No concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 07:01, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Leaderboard (talk) 09:30, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support definitely, trustworthy and competent. -Mh7kJ (talk) 09:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support No cencerns. Active user on cross-wiki. --Uncitoyentalk 10:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Oppose, Grant steward instead :P. Thanks for volunteering, active xwiki, why not.   Support of course. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:14, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Why not.--MrJaroslavik (talk) 10:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support! --Vituzzu (talk) 10:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support-BRP ever 10:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support dwf² 10:36, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Strong support Yes, please. Trijnsteltalk 10:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   ¡Por supuesto! Sgd. —Hasley 14:33, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Ok. --Irwin talk2me 15:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Of course!Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 15:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support--20041027 tatsu (talk) 16:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Was there any doubt that I would not support you? Savh has proven theirselves more then enough in the past as steward. --Wiki13 (talk) 16:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 16:34, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Strong support --LuchoCR (talk) 16:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Oppose Not falling for the trick this time. --KPFC💬 17:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
    Which trick, @KPFC? Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
    @KPFC: I have no idea what you're referring to. I have no intention to trick anyone. Would you care to explain? Savhñ 18:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --Saroj Uprety (talk) 17:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support * Pppery * it has begun 17:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Supportcsc-1 23:27, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Strong support Welcome back --DannyS712 (talk) 05:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support -FASTILY 08:45, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  • Support Stryn (talk) 10:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support ‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support —-mirinano (talk) 12:10, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --Geonuch (talk) 14:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Why not? --Galahad (sasageyo!)(esvoy) 14:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --Sotiale (talk) 23:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support obviously. --IWI (talk) 08:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:59, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support yes —Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 14:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   SupportAmmarpad (talk) 09:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Strong support --Belwine (talk) 12:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support I thought I'd voted but maybe not --Herby talk thyme 13:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support. Meiræ 19:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Welcome back = No concerns ミラP@Miraclepine 20:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Minoraxtalk 03:58, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Requests for global rename permissionsEdit

  Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the global rename policy and the global renamers policy page.
Stewards
When you give someone global rename rights, please add them to the list of global renamers and ask them to subscribe to the global renamers' mailing list.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
  3. You have considered the addition of a user language box to your user page
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).
=== Global rename for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = meta.wikimedia <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = Username
}}
:''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+2 week}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Global rename for GeonuchEdit

Not ending before 7 March 2021 07:16 UTC

Hello everyone. I would like to help users through renaming process especially users by Thai community. I understand that no global renamers who have Thai language skill at this time (see User talk:Geonuch#Renaming) and my home wiki (Thai Wikipedia) has a frequent problem that needs to request for changing username (such as, [2], [3], [4], [5], etc.). I'm active on many Thai Wikimedia projects and have sysop right on thwiki, thwikibooks, and thwikisource. I have understood global rename policy and hope that I will be of benefit of the community. Best regards, --Geonuch (talk) 07:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

  •   Support Looks fine to me. Leaderboard (talk) 07:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support CU and sysop on thwiki, can be trusted with global renamer tools. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support He/she is an admin on many Thai wikis. There are dozens that you done blocks per username policy on home wiki. New admin on home wiki but it isn't no problem. I guess there is no global renamer who knows Thai very well. He/she can help with renamer requests for Thai wikis firstly. --Uncitoyentalk 10:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Per usual standard that a sysop in a medium / large wiki that is not under a cloud locally can be automatically entitled to the tool. They are a CU in th and th is a large wiki. That's fit my usual criterion. Thanks for volunteering. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support For sure. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support No concerns. --ZabeMath (talk) 11:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support, sure. Sgd. —Hasley 11:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support —-mirinano (talk) 12:11, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --20041027 tatsu (talk) 16:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --Sotiale (talk) 23:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support dwf² 07:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   SupportAmmarpad (talk) 09:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support, Sure. -- CptViraj (talk) 09:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --Tvcccp (talk) 11:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks good. — csc-1 20:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 00:55, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Sure! --Superpes15 (talk) 06:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Requests for global IP block exemptionEdit

  Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions. Please review Global IP block exemption. You may request Global IP block exemption via stewards wikimedia.org if you can not edit this page.
Please note: Global IP block exemption does NOT make one immune to locally-created blocks of any sort, only global blocks.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting global IP block exemption, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To request global IP block exemption
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why you need the access and why you're suitable. If needed, link to relevant discussions.
=== Global IP block exempt for [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}}
 |discussion=
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if there is demonstrated need for the permission, such as bypassing a global block from someone who is not the intended target.

Global IP block exempt for 永愛所有小貓咪Edit

<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --永愛所有小貓咪 (talk) 13:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

@永愛所有小貓咪:你好,如果只需要编辑中文维基,去w:zh:WP:RFR申请即可,这里的权限是用于编辑维基数据等网站的。(just explaining if they just want to edit zhwiki they can apply for local IPBE.)--Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 09:56, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
@Super Wang Any updates on the local IPBE situation. I didn't see any zhwp IPBE granted. As the requestor is just saying Wikipedia, we cannot assume it is only zh, they might be meaning en (which they also have some edits). Overall I don't see a GIPBE unreasonable per normal GFW situations. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
@Camouflaged Mirage: User has not reqested for local IPBE yet, maybe they don't know how to. I don't think it's unreasonable to grant them GIPBE either. As GIPBE doesn't make one immune of local IP block, I'm suggesting them applying for a local IPBE flag additionally. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 11:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Given that this user edited today, they don't seem to be affected by local IP blocks, I won't suggest local IPBE. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 11:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
@Super Wang I will guess the local IPBE can be applied if there is a local block issue as they seems to suggest it's just a global block they need to exempt from. Will appreciate your help to guide the user on local situation, or I can leave them a message if needed but since you are on it, let me defer to you first. Thanks. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
@Camouflaged Mirage: I noted that this user uses Traditional Chinese, which indicates they are from HK, Macau or Taiwan (but they didn't disclose). I guess they don't need to bypass GFW, just need to evade global IP block, so GIPBE is enough. And yes, I've been enthusiastic about helping people for local IPBE, so I will help them apply for local IPBE flag in case they are in need. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 11:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. @Super Wang So to make it easier for stewards: in conclusion, this user doesn't need zhwp IPBE but GIPBE. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for ZJiekaiEdit

[Application from ZJiekai] I'm in China. And due to GFW I edit wiki via a proxy. I need global IPBE so that I can edit language links. thanks, --SickManWP (talk) 03:19, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for Green BurgerEdit

I have been globally blocked thanks to vandalism in my network. The block prevented me from making my Wikipedia account, so I had to request one, but when I tried using my sandbox, I noticed I couldn’t. Can I get an exemption for my account so I can use it? thanks, --Green Burger (talk) 00:01, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Global IP block exempt for Aung Koung Myat Bhone HtetEdit

<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --Aung Koung Myat Bhone Htet (💬) 03:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

  Done --Martin Urbanec (talk) 10:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

[[User:Template:Subst:REVISIONUSER | Template:Subst:REVISIONUSER]]的全局IP块免除Edit

Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissionsEdit

  Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting 2FA tester global permissions, make sure that:

  1. You are logged in on this wiki;
  2. You have read Help page about the two factor authentication;
To request additional global permissions
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and INDICATE you have read the Help page.
=== 2FA Tester for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = Username
 |discussion=
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if there is no reason not to grant one. A steward will review the request.

2FA Tester for R4356thEdit

Hello, I would like to request the global 2FA Tester group to make my account more secure. I have read H:2FA and have experience using the feature on non-Wikimedia wikis. Thank you. R4356th (talk) 10:11, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

  Done Ruslik (talk) 20:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank you very much. R4356th (talk) 06:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

2FA Tester for Ase1esteEdit

Hi. I would also like to apply for 2FA permission for my doppelganger account so that it is much less likely to be compromised and affect me. I already have 2FA permission for this account. Thanks. ~ Ase1estecharge-paritytime 18:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Requests for other global permissionsEdit

  Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting additional global permissions, make sure that:

  1. You are logged in on this wiki;
  2. No specific section on this page exists for the permission you want to request;
To request additional global permissions
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain what kind of access you need and why. If needed, link to relevant discussions. If you hold, or have previously held, the right and are asking for either a renewal or revival of that right, please add a link to the previous discussion.
=== <Add requested permission here> for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = Username
 |discussion=
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a short period of consideration. A steward will review the request.

Renew global-interface-editor for SophivorusEdit

Hi! I'd like to request a renewal of my global-interface-editor permission. I've had the permission for about three years mainly because I'm the main developer and maintainer of the ProveIt gadget (used in over 40 wikis). I'm also the main developer and maintainer of the Transcluder and Excerpt modules (used in over 20 wikis) that occasionally require me to edit protected pages, as well as some smaller tools on Wikiversity and the Spanish Wikipedia. I haven't been too active lately but I was very active earlier last year and I expect a similar period of activity sometime this year. Thanks for your consideration! Sophivorus (talk) 13:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

  •   Support ProveIt is useful. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support, sure. Sgd. —Hasley 14:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support No concerns. --ZabeMath (talk) 14:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 15:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Looks good. — csc-1 05:08, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support dwf² 07:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support No concerns. --Uncitoyentalk 08:05, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support while there was a slight issue last year on one project, Sophivorus respected the local community practices following the issue, had no further concerning actions reported, and moved forward to make positive contributions. Support in that he is doing good work and respecting policies. — xaosflux Talk 16:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 20:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support Great maintainer of tools super useful to have the tools, Sadads (talk) 22:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   SupportAmmarpad (talk) 09:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support. Meiræ 19:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  •   Support --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:37, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

See alsoEdit