Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Steward requests/Global permissions

< Steward requests
(Redirected from SRIPBE)
← Requests and proposals Steward requests (Global permissions) latest archive→
Shortcut:
SRGP

This page hosts requests for global permissions. To make a request, read the relevant policy (global rollback , global sysop , global rename , …) and make a request below. Explain why membership is needed for that group, and detail prior experience or qualifications.

This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.

Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter helper and maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).

Quick navigation:
Dynamic pages:

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests for global rollback permissionsEdit

 
Shortcut:
SRGR
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global rollback policy.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that: You have sufficient activity to meet the requirements to be allocated the global rollback flag

To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable.
=== Global rollback for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
::''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+5 days}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than 5 days (other than requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, no other exceptions are allowed , no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Global rollback for USSR-SlavEdit

Status:    In progress
Not ending before 10 June 2023 06:45 UTC

Hello. I need global rollback permissions. Because I use SWviewer to patrol cross-wikis and sometimes the local abuse-filter would not allow me to operation. I confirmed the Global rollback policy. Thank.--USSR-Slav (СССР-Слав) (talk) 06:45, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Global rollback for LR0725Edit

Status:    In progress
Not ending before 10 June 2023 15:29 UTC

Hello, I am here to request permission of global rollback. I am patolling and reverting cross-wiki vandalisms by SWViewers mainly, but sometimes I manually undo vandalisms at mobile device. If I have global rollback right, I think I will deal with cross-wiki vandalism more effectively. I confirmed global rollback policy and local policies related to global rollback, too. Thanks for your consideration! --LR0725 [ Talk | Contribs ] 15:30, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Requests for global sysop permissionsEdit

 
Shortcut:
SRGS
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global sysops policy.
Stewards
When you give someone global sysop rights, please list them on Users with global sysop access and ask them to subscribe to the global sysops mailing list.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account ;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).
=== Global sysop for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
:''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+2 week}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential. Please note: Since 2019 all global sysops are required to have two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled.

Requests for global rename permissionsEdit

 
Shortcut:
SRGREN
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the global rename policy and the global renamers policy page.
Stewards
When you give someone global rename rights, please add them to the list of global renamers and ask them to subscribe to the global renamers' mailing list.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
  3. You have considered the addition of a user language box to your user page
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).
=== Global rename for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = meta.wikimedia <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user -->
}}
:''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+2 week}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). While all input is welcome, there is a hard 80% support requirement for this role as per the global renamer policy.

Global rename for מקףEdit

Status:    In progress
Not ending before 6 June 2023 02:54 UTC

Shalom,

I'm interested in helping rename mostly in the Hebrew language, like requests that come from HeWiki (I'm very familiar with the local rules).

In addition, I often monitor registrations of problematic usernames, and if the permission is granted I can also track and accompany them through the process more effectively.

I'm a sysop on HeWiki and an importer on HeWikinews, and have enabled 2FA (And I even wrote this guide to encourage its use).

Thank you all, —מקף⁻ණ‎‏ (Hyphen) 02:54, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  Support Tirishan (talk) 21:22, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Global rename for GadirEdit

Status:    In progress
Not ending before 9 June 2023 07:12 UTC

Hello all. I am active and experienced editor. I am contribute on Azerbaijani Wikipedia. There is a related request page in the local. I can look at user's requests like an experienced user. Thanks. Best regards, Gadir (talk) 07:12, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  •   Oppose. Relatively low edit count; not a sysop on any wiki. Given that renamer rights requires a lot of trust, I'm a bit reluctant to support, especially when the user has not demonstrated an understanding of what global renamer rights are even for. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 07:43, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Hello. As I said, I am contribute on Azerbaijani Wikipedia. I know what it is. Is it necessary to be a sysop? Thank you. Gadir (talk) 07:53, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    It's not a requirement; holding sysop rights, however, is a sign of trust (not that I don't trust you – it just elevates the level of trust, which is high for GR). --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 10:56, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Yes, I understand you, you are right. I respect your opinion, I left a note about it below. You can look. Gadir (talk) 11:01, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Not a problem. In saying that, though, if you think you have the necessary experience required to be a sysop on azwiki, by all means nominate yourself! I know that edit count isn't a factor alone in determining whether a candidate is suitable for adminship or not, but I became an admin on my home wiki when my account only had more than a mere 11,000 (local) edits and a few months old. Given you've been a user on azwiki since Jul 2017 with over 27,000 edits, by all means, give it a shot if you think you're capable of being an admin. SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 11:15, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I'm not thinking about it at the moment, but I'm thinking of doing it and I will. Thank you for your valuable advice. Gadir (talk) 11:20, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • @Gadir:, the az.wiki local page seems to be rarely used. How do you plan to use the right in this case? Also, is there a reason on why you're not a sysop? Leaderboard (talk) 09:54, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Leaderboard, as you can see from the contribution profile, I am active and experienced. Actually requests not little (for example). and current requests still on hold. Just because some users don't know and I'm going to help them with that. For example, if they register with an inappropriate username, I will encourage them to change their name. Like this. I can also take a look at general requests. I want to help generally and I can this. No particular reason for sysop. I think for sysop. I have enough experience for this. Thanks for your attention. Regards, Gadir (talk) 10:44, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Gadir:, do you intend to process requests from non-az.wiki users? Leaderboard (talk) 17:31, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Yes, I can this. I know Global username policy. Gadir (talk) 04:09, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Support experienced user, Thanks for volunteering. DreamRimmer (talk) 12:52, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Question: it seems like you have been involved in some conflict recently [1] and there are a couple of recent blocks at azwiki [2]. Are these issues resolved? Do you think your community would support you in becoming a renamer? --Johannnes89 (talk) 09:12, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Hello. Thank you for your comment. That's another matter, but as you can see, most of them are blocks applied by the same person. Is this normal situation? Yes, the last issue has been resolved and the block has been removed and with @Xeyal (After making a request to the Meta). The blocking was not correct, yet we were blocked for days. Other users have confirmed that it is not true. So there is no problem, you can get the opinion of the community about me. I have no problems or objections. I am a trusted user, I am already in many user groups local for a long time. Everyone knows that I am a bona fide user. Regards, Gadir (talk) 09:40, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Neutral --Ameisenigel (talk) 19:01, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Support. Observed his proactiveness in AzWiki. --Interfase (talk) 10:30, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Support is an active user. — Xeyal talk 10:32, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
— Note: An editor has expressed a concern that Xeyal (talk • contribs) has been canvassed to this discussion.
— Note: An editor has expressed a concern that Bikar Orxan (talk • contribs) has been canvassed to this discussion.

*   Support It is an active user Wealszy (talk) 10:39, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

— Note: An editor has expressed a concern that Wealszy (talk • contribs) has been canvassed to this discussion.
  •   Support Seems enough for this permission. LR0725 (talk) 10:52, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Question: - Is this an acceptable act under your home wiki policy? Syunsyunminmin 🗨️talk 13:04, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Hello. I wanted to get the opinion of important users and I did it openly. "Do you think your community would support you in becoming a renamer?" after this idea. Normally I wouldn't. Is there a problem? Gadir (talk) 13:12, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    I mean important, I mean experienced and trusted users. Because they can give the right opinion. Gadir (talk) 13:19, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Why did you send the message to the individual talk pages instead of the community portal? Community Portal is sufficient. I wonder about informing people who you thought would give the right opinion. Syunsyunminmin 🗨️talk 13:28, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Yes, excuse me, you are true, I forgot this and but there is more than 25 subject in Village Pump, and so there isn't much activity there. I wanted to get the opinions of certain and limited people (per request). Gadir (talk) 13:41, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    There is also such an experience used there. For certain topics. Gadir (talk) 13:53, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    No matter how little village pump activity there is, sending messages to individual talk pages is down from support for me. Unfortunately, this time I will make a   Weak oppose. Syunsyunminmin 🗨️talk 13:56, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    No problem and the rule you specified does not allow sending this to more people, I did not send it to more people. But I agree to you, I should have written this there. Thanks. Gadir (talk) 14:00, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Weak oppose as above. Aramil Feraxa (Write to me!) 14:14, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Support the user is experienced and active. So I think he deserve this status.-Wikipediya M (talk) 18:36, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
— Note: An editor has expressed a concern that Wikipediya M (talk • contribs) has been canvassed to this discussion.
  •   Oppose per above. Not a sysop on any project, azwiki rename page is essentially never used, no obvious need for the right -FASTILY 05:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Hi. It's really needed. I explained how to use it above. You can check the local request page and current requests. It's not necessary to be sysop, but I understand. Thx. Gadir (talk) 09:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Vermont, hello. It is true for the user to draw lines above the messages of people who support me? I invited them per request. And they supported me. Gadir (talk) 10:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    It's not a problem, per se, but they should be signing these comments. Canvassing isn't a thing on Meta-Wiki like it is on many other projects: if there's a global right or request which is needed locally, canvassing is going to happen in asking users to come here and show that the request or right is needed locally. It can still be helpful to see which users found this organically and which were asked to participate, however. Best regards, Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 15:27, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Oppose - Not particularly comfortable with this one. The advertisement of this discussion on the homewiki suggests a lack of knowledge of best practices across Wikimedia, and since this is a global user right that knowledge base is important to have. Also difficult to evaluate the candidate's trustworthiness without holding local admin rights or being very involved in the rename process in a clerk/helper type role. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Support Trusted user. AlPaD (talk) 11:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Support as a borderline applicant. You clearly have the experience, but for whatever reason don't have sysop. That in itself doesn't disqualify an applicant. The canvassing was unnecessary and regrettable, but it's clear to me that was done in good-faith and without malice. Global renamer is that rather odd role where it's tricky to force people to have "knowledge of best practices across Wikimedia" (quoting Ajraddatz) - not only would one not be seeing this statement from an en.wiki or similarly large wiki - Gadir's mistakes are relatively benign and can be easily fixed. Hence you're getting my support. Leaderboard (talk) 08:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Neutral --TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 10:28, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Weak oppose because this user has solid experiences but there is a problem Syunsyunminmin told. I took a same mistook (I mentioned specific users on multiple topics) in the past, and I was warned. Also, his block log is not pure white, so I use this polling template. --Tmv (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Tmv, hello. There is no problem but as I stated I wasn't going to invite anyone but based on the comment above I did it for good intent. And users did not object either. I can share detailed information about the blocks. As you can see, the blocks were applied by the same user. This is not normal. I even reported to the latest Meta and solved. Best regards, Gadir (talk) 15:00, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Gadir hi, and yes, I believe you didn't maliciously do it (and I have a similar experience). Still, you shouldn't have invited particuler local users. While this might sound severe, I think it's important to note this point when strong power is concerned. --Tmv (talk) 11:23, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •   Oppose He is an active user, but he made a wrong name in Azwiki several times and the rights were taken from him some time ago. Wealszy (talk) 12:30, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Wealszy:, what "wrong name" did he make, and which "rights" were taken away from him and when? Leaderboard (talk) 04:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Leaderboard:, He made this and that wrong name mover.Page mover, file mover permissions have been taken from it. Wealszy (talk) 07:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Hello, @Leaderboard. As you can see the changes from 2 years ago. And it's not wrong, I just didn't give a reason. I now have page and file renamer rights. You can check. But do you think this has anything to do with the global rename user right? Best regards, Gadir (talk) 08:26, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Wealszy:, what do you think of Gadir's response? Leaderboard (talk) 19:31, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Requests for global IP block exemptionEdit

 
Shortcut:
SRIPBE
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions. Please review Global IP block exemption. You may request Global IP block exemption via stewards wikimedia.org if you can not edit this page.
Please note: Global IP block exemption does NOT make one immune to locally-created blocks of any sort, only global blocks.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting global IP block exemption, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account ;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To request global IP block exemption
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why you need the access and why you're suitable. If needed, link to relevant discussions.
=== Global IP block exempt for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}}
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if there is demonstrated need for the permission, such as bypassing a global block from someone who is not the intended target.

Global IP block exempt for EndermoongameEdit

Status:    In progress

I am from the People's Republic of China, where, as stewards may know, access to virtually all Wikimedia projects has been blocked. While I have been granted local IP block exempt on Chinese Wikipedia, I would like to contribute to other Wikimedia projects such as Wiktionary and Wikidata as well, so a global IP block exempt would be really helpful. Thanks. --Endermoongame (talk) 23:57, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Global IP Block Exempt for alistair3149Edit

Status:    On hold

Per UTRS #72868 --DeltaQuadBot (talk) 20:00, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  On hold Awaiting reply. -- Amanda (she/her) 13:04, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Global IP block exempt for Huggums537Edit

Status:    On hold

Hi. I edit English Wikipedia and Commons plus a couple others now and again. My concerns are security and privacy. The Wikimedia sites are the only ones that make me turn off my VPNs or use non privacy-masking browsers (such as TOR etc.). I have two lengthy blocks on my record, but both of those blocks required a standard checkuser investigation, and no evidence of sockpuppeting has ever been found because it is just something I don't do. I've been back in good standing for probably at least two years now, and I made good on my promise to create a new article (2 of them now in fact). Also, if it helps, I did gain additional user rights after my unblock so this should promote the idea I can be a trusted user. I promise to use the exemption responsibly as a show of my gratitude for my continuous security to be enabled. I have also requested the exemption via email at the local level on English Wikipedia, but want to cover my bases for other places I might edit as well. Thanks. Huggums537 (talk) 10:00, 9 May 2023 (UTC) Updated on 10:28, 9 May 2023 (UTC) Updated again on 21:36, 9 May 2023 (UTC) Updated one final time on 21:44, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Given the block history mentioned, I would be most comfortable moving forward here after the local IP block exemption flag is granted (and you are likely to encounter local blocks not covered by GIPBE anyway). --Base (talk) 10:05, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sure. Thanks for responding. I'm still waiting for a reply from my local CU's, and I believe many of them are familiar with my unblocking situation as well so I agree they will be best to grant exemption first also. Thanks. Huggums537 (talk) 14:24, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Base, how long should we wait to hear from my local CU's, and how long do these requests usually stay open here? I've seen a couple that have been on here since mid-late April, but I have no idea how long the backlog is on my local CU's list because we send in emails for the request or use this "UTRS" ticketing/server system that normal users aren't able to see. I'd like to keep this open until hearing from them since I have linked to this discussion as part of my request to my local CU's, and I'd like to keep them in the loop without breaking any chains if possible. Huggums537 (talk) 02:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Huggums537, most requests don't take very long, but most requests aren't like yours.
Security/privacy exemptions from the no open proxies policy are generally limited to users who seek security from external actors, such as governments...not for privacy from the website you're accessing, i.e., Wikimedia projects. Our anti-abuse mechanisms are heavily reliant on IP information, and we try to avoid granting IPBE except when it is necessary to allow people to safely edit. This is especially important when there have been concerns about a user's behavior, as you note with your home wiki block log.
Most VPNs allow some sort of split tunneling, which would allow you to continue to use a VPN on other sites/applications while connecting to Wikimedia projects normally. I hope this helps. Best, Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 22:47, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for the reply. VPN is not my only means of privacy/security. TOR and other proxy based privacy browsers I use do not offer split tunneling. Also, split tunneling doesn't help me since I use these privacy/security features to seek security and privacy from outside actors who could also follow me to websites I'm accessing such as Wikimedia projects, thus the reasoning for my request. As for my blocks, I never should have even mentioned those, and only did so to show honestly about my past. I see no rational explanation for you saying anything about it being a "behavioral concern" because if there were any truth to that I should never have been unblocked in the first place considering blocks are supposed to be preventative of any behavioral concerns, not punitive behavior assessments against users to follow them around for the rest of their lives... Huggums537 (talk) 23:18, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I understand general concerns about security, but you haven't articulated a reason for why your usage of Wikipedia needs to be anonymous, i.e., warrants an exemption from the no open proxies policy. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 23:41, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have, but you seem to be wanting [even more] specifics, and that would make for very bad privacy/security use on a public forum. [In other words, I have already mentioned concerns about someone following me...] Huggums537 (talk) 23:46, 21 May 2023 (UTC) Updated on 23:49, 21 May 2023 (UTC) Updated again on 23:53, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If it helps anyone to make a decision on the matter, I can let you know (without giving too many personal details) it has been a situation serious enough to warrant me reporting the matter to law enforcement authorties, the FTC, the IRS, my local state employment agency, and having a credit freeze done on my credit reports. I think if my situation warrants all that, it warrants an exemption from this open proxies policy. Huggums537 (talk) 02:41, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I just want to avoid trading all my personal information for something it will cost you all nothing to trust me with since the worst possible thing I could ever do with it is get myself blocked again. Huggums537 (talk) 03:06, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It doesn't cost anything to restore vandalized pages, or block users who abuse this privilege, but it could end up costing me everything the longer I'm vulnerable on these sites... Huggums537 (talk) 05:05, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
One more thing I forgot to mention is that another reason the split tunneling does not help me is because it is a requirement for my employment that I must travel, and connecting to public Wifi is a security/privacy risk that split tunneling does not protect me from to allow me to safely edit since the features of my current VPN don't allow that. Huggums537 (talk) 22:27, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Employment requiring a VPN on public wifi is usually sufficient in my book. For the future, we usually handle these via email (stewards wikimedia.org). There is never any requirement to discuss privacy matters publicly.
I will note that global IPBE won't allow you to edit with a VPN on your home project, the English Wikipedia...it'd exempt you from global blocks, but you'd also need local IPBE, as enwiki blocks proxies locally. Similar to Base's comment above, I'd be okay granting gIPBE after local IPBE is granted. Best regards, Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 03:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Global IP block exempt for NadzikEdit

Status:    On hold
@Nadzik: You can't request this right without any reason. -- Amanda (she/her) 13:32, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@AmandaNP, I've sent an VRT ticket, but was directed to apply here. My reason for the request is me often using VPN during my travels and while using a public internet hotspots. I have been affected by global IP bans in the past when trying to edit projects where I don't hold advanced permissions (e.g. en.wiki or commons). Please let me know if additional information is required. Nadzik (talk) 19:42, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Global IP Block Exempt for FireDragonValoEdit

Status:    In progress

Per UTRS #73260 --DeltaQuadBot (talk) 00:11, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Global IP Block Exempt for SkyWarriorEdit

Status:    In progress

Per UTRS #73347 --DeltaQuadBot (talk) 00:11, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Global IP Block Exempt for ProgValEdit

Status:    In progress

Per UTRS #73777 --DeltaQuadBot (talk) 00:11, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Global IP Block Exempt for SBS6577PEdit

Status:    In progress

Per UTRS #73971 --DeltaQuadBot (talk) 14:00, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Global IP Block Exempt for WissenBleibtMachtEdit

Status:    In progress

Per UTRS #74154 --DeltaQuadBot (talk) 13:00, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

probably resolved due to local IP block exemption at dewiki [3], the user rarely edits at other projects. Johannnes89 (talk) 06:31, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
+1 - should be resolved TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 10:25, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Per Ticket:2023053010010166, the user needs a global exemption. —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 21:23, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Global IP Block Exempt for 01010101lzyEdit

Status:    In progress

Per UTRS #74298 --DeltaQuadBot (talk) 15:00, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Global IP block exempt for LondonpixelsEdit

Status:    In progress

(Steward clerk action) Per ticket #2023052610007124. --LuciferianThomas 08:43, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Global IP block exempt for MTRIProdEdit

Status:    In progress

Because I often use VPNs and mobile devices to make edits on Wikipedia, I am often blocked by having the same IP that was blocked before. So, I request to be granted this permission so that I will not face that situation again. Thank so much. --Đỗ Trí ✓ (talk) 14:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissionsEdit

  Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting 2FA tester global permissions, make sure that:

  1. You are logged in on this wiki;
  2. You have read the help page about two-factor authentication;
To request 2FA tester global permissions
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and INDICATE you have read the Help page.
=== 2FA Tester for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global <!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}}
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if there is no reason not to grant one. A steward will review the request.

2FA Tester for INTERCOEdit

Status:    Done

I would like to protect this account with 2FA. This account is for editing from public Wi-Fi, etc., and it is not used frequently, so you may not notice unauthorized login.I have read and understood the help page about 2FA. , thanks, --INTERCO (talk) 13:53, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  Done @INTERCO: --Superpes15 (talk) 23:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Superpes15,thanks INTERCO (talk) 12:33, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

2FA Tester for DrgEdit

Status:    Done

I would like to enable 2FA to protect my account. I have read and understood the 2FA help page. thanks, --Drg (talk) 22:05, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  Done @Drg: --Superpes15 (talk) 23:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

2FA Tester for GDSTheChosenOneEdit

Status:    Done

I would like to enable 2FA on my account. I have read and understood the 2FA help page. Thanks, -- GDSTheChosenOne (talk) 09:45, 29 May 2023 (UTC) GDSTheChosenOne (talk) 09:46, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  Done @GDSTheChosenOne: --Superpes15 (talk) 23:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

2FA Tester for SmordarskiEdit

Status:    Done

Hello, I would like to enable 2FA to protect my account. I have read the help page and already have the following: Password Manager, Google Authenticator, backup phone for codes, strong password for Wikipedia, and a offline note taking app to write down the scratch codes. Note: I wish to secure my account because I am starting to contribute to Wikipedia more and I had my account for along time. Best regards, --Smordarski (talk) 00:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  Done @Smordarski: --Superpes15 (talk) 23:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

2FA Tester for Mark WoollattEdit

Status:    In progress

I would like to add 2FA to my account as I start to edit more items. I have read and am familiar with the use of 2FA. Thanks.

Requests for other global permissionsEdit

  Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting additional global permissions, make sure that:

  1. You are logged in on this wiki;
  2. No specific section on this page exists for the permission you want to request;
To request additional global permissions
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain what kind of access you need and why. If needed, link to relevant discussions. If you hold, or have previously held, the right and are asking for either a renewal or revival of that right, please add a link to the previous discussion.
=== <Add requested permission here> for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = Username
 |discussion=
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a short period of consideration. A steward will review the request.

See alsoEdit

Cooperation requests for:comments (local) (global) · translation

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Global_permissions&oldid=25115050#Requests_for_global_IP_block_exemption"